35 Burst results for "Cavanaugh"
Bloomberg Radio New York
"cavanaugh" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"Hager And I'm Karen Moscow in U.S. stock index futures on the rise this morning we're coming up to 6 O one on Wall Street and we check the markets every 15 minutes throughout the trading day on Bloomberg and S&P futures are up about 26 points down futures up a 157. And NASDAQ futures up about 73, the ten year treasury, little change, yields 2.98% and a yield on the two year 3.16% and nymex crude oil is down three tenths of a percent. Nathan. Karen, we begin with a growing number of companies clamping down on hiring. It's a trend showing up in firms from tech to banking. Let's get the latest live from Bloomberg's we need a young good morning granita. Good morning, Nathan. Bloomberg sources say apple is putting a lid on hiring to limit spending. Leaders have not adopted a company-wide policy, but this more cautious approach mimics moves by Amazon and Microsoft. And it's more evidence that even Silicon Valley is worried about an impending recession. Now Goldman Sachs also plans to slow hiring to rein in expenses, CFO Dennis Coleman says Goldman could also reduce the pace of replacing staff it loses because of attrition and will reinstate annual performance reviews. Live in New York, I'm Renee young Bloomberg daybreak. All right, we need to thank you. We're also seeing a tepid outlook from another big name in tech shares of IBM or down about 5% in early trading. The company is lowering forecast for free cash flow this year due to the impact of a strong dollar and the loss of business in Russia. Bloomberg's Shirley pellet has more. The revision overshadowed results the top analyst estimates signaling that demand for mainframe computers consulting and cloud services remain strong amid concerns of a pullback in tech spending. IBM said it estimates free cash flow of $10 billion this year at the low end of a previous range of ten to $10.5 billion. Chief financial officer Jim Cavanaugh said the reduced range is not a result of a broader business slowdown In New York, Charlie pellet Bloomberg daybreak. All right, Charlie, thank you, earnings continue to roll in with ten companies in the S&P 500 reporting today this afternoon we hear from Netflix, Bloomberg's Tom busby has a preview. Well, the keeper investors will be subscriber losses for the second quarter, which the streaming giant predicted could total 2 million in its previous earnings report in April when it announced its first ever subscriber losses. Also of note whether the blowout success of the latest season of Stranger Things may have helped Netflix keep some subscribers, and its new crackdown on password sharing now in effect in 5 Latin American markets. Bloomberg consensus calls for earnings per share of $2 91 cents, revenues of just over $8 billion. Tom busby, Bloomberg, daybreak. Tom, thank you. Now to the latest in Twitter's legal dispute with Elon Musk, Twitter is dismissing Musk's complaints that he does not have enough information about spam and robot accounts. The company calls it an irrelevant sideshow and wants to judge to hold a trial as soon as possible over Musk's cancellation of his $44 billion takeover. Watching Bitcoin rise this morning, Karen, but it's off its highs for the day. In fact, earlier Bitcoin almost hit 23,000. The cryptocurrency has struggled to escape a 19 to 22,000 range as investors lick their wounds from the recent route. Martin Chavez from 6th street partner says the time has come to finally regulate the crypto market. Regrettably, we usually wait until some calamity before there is regulation. And the question is always, was this calamity big enough or does there need to be another leg down before we have the appropriate regulation? Martin Chavez at 6th street partners made the comments in an interview on Bloomberg television will have more on the future of Bitcoin throughout the day as the Bloomberg crypto summit gets underway in New York. Well, turning to the global economy now, Nathan pressure is building on the European Central Bank, sources say the ECB may consider raising interest rates by more than expected this week because the worsening inflation backdrop. Sources say the Central Bank may raise rates by 50 basis points on Thursday that's double that 25 point high get outline just last month. Well, back here in the U.S., Karen prices the pump keep dropping. In fact, they've fallen for 35 straight days hitting a two month low. Triple-A says the nationwide average is just below four 50 a gallon, prices have fallen more than 10% since hitting a record last month. Climate change and focus at The White House, Nathan, President Biden is reportedly considering declaring a climate emergency as soon as this week details now for a Bloomberg's Amy Morris from our 99 one newsroom in Washington. Senator Jeff merkley of Oregon says climate legislation has no chance to get through Congress. Instead, he says the president should use the full powers of the executive branch to declare an emergency, which would give him the authority to redirect funds for clean energy projects or restrict offshore drilling and could even curtail the transport of fossil fuels. And now sources are telling The Washington Post that Biden is expected to announce additional actions aimed at curbing emissions as soon as this week. In Washington, I'm Amy Morris, Bloomberg daybreak. All right, Amy, thank you. Let's turn to Capitol Hill now where a computer chips are in focus. The Senate wants to quickly pass $52 billion in grants and incentives for American semiconductor makers. Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer says Democrats and Republicans are hashing out the final details. The legislation is a scaled down version of a larger bill intended to make the U.S. technology sector more competitive with China. Our supply chain issues are also in focus this morning, Nathan, treasury secretary Janet Yellen is calling on so called a trusted U.S. allies to help fix a supply chain, speaking in South Korea, Yellen called on U.S. partners to strengthen trade relationships with what she calls friend shoring. Princess is about deepening relationships and diversifying our supply chains with a greater number of trusted trading partners to purposes to lower risks for our economy and theirs. Treasury secretary Janet Yellen singled out China as a country on which the U.S. and others should be less reliant. Futures this morning on the Raj S&P futures up about 30 points down features of a 189 NASDAQ futures up 85. Straight ahead, your latest local headlines plus a check of sports, this is Bloomberg. Thanks Karen 6 O 7 on Wall Street 73° in Central Park as we get ready for a heat wave and
The Charlie Kirk Show
Biden vs. Kavanaugh Sex Allegations Show Democrats' Jaw-Dropping Hypocrisy
"Moore back during the brett cavanaugh. Hearings that was three years ago. It's amazing to think three years ago. Brett cavenaugh stood in front of the united states senate to be confirmed to the united states. Supreme court you remember how the media covered brett cavenaugh as an attempted rapist. You see revolutionary movements like rich versus poor poor versus rich women against men and black versus white are helpful as a means to an end to get political power. The brett cavenaugh example was a great example of how they were trying to use a moment of a movement to try to get political power but if actually ever threatened one of their own they might send andrew cuomo out to pasture but they could replace it with the democrat. They might send an al franken out to pasture but they can replace it with a democrat but if ever was sending a joe biden out to pasture which means that a republican become president. No way because power in regards to what the left values what they prioritize is much higher on the hierarchy than actually caring about believing all women play cut sixty eight and attempted rape as though yes my supreme court nominee may be. An attempted rapists is attempted. Rapes potential attempted rape attempted rape. This is charge of attempted. Attempted rape a curry that is so critical to the nomination of judge. Cavanaugh high school drunk at attempted rape and attempted rape. This is a small example of what we had to deal with three years ago. But of course. Joe biden under credible accusations of groping women who worked for him tara reid and otherwise ignore it because we need him to become president so we can control the executive branch of the government
WTOP
"cavanaugh" Discussed on WTOP
"Knowledge local decisions for commercial banking. It's better at Burke and Herbert Bank at your service since 18 52, Jack w T o p. Traffic, Okay. Lauryn Ricketts Looks like the temps are headed up pretty quickly this morning. They are and we're moving through the seventies. Pretty quickly. Temperatures will eventually make it into the Upper eighties and low nineties a degree or two warmer than yesterday. And, of course, We've got the humidity around. We've got a little smokiness out there added as well from the wildfires out to the West will remain dry today and overnight temperatures are falling into the sixties and seventies. A little fog overnight as well. And then tomorrow background 90 degrees. Partly sunny will have a chance for us Some isolated showers and thunderstorms. Tomorrow afternoon wanted two of those could be on the stronger side, but again well, the humidity around tomorrow. I don't think it will quite be as thick and a little bit of a breeze as well. Now we get into your Thursday and Friday were back in the low to mid eighties will have more clouds and sunshine and about 30 or 40 to 50% chance of seeing some showers and thunderstorms on your Thursday and Friday and again. It's going to be incredibly humid on Thursday and Friday and humidity continues into the weekend back in the mid to upper eighties this week, and we'll have some sunshine 74 right now in Washington, Upper Marlboro at 69 Annapolis at 74, Manassas. Lauren. We're at 80 here in friendship Heights. Brought to you by Lynn. The plumber trusted same day service seven days a week, and it's 9 22. We want Martian accent. Dozens of local abortion rights supporters upset about a recent Supreme Court decision took their message straight to a Supreme Court justices home about 50 people gathered in a Chevy Chase Park late yesterday, protesting the recent Supreme Court decision regarding the Texas abortion law. They went to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was home. He was one of the five justices who rejected a challenge to Texas's law that allows private citizens to sue providers that perform abortions. After a fetal heartbeat can be detected. About a dozen police officers surrounded Cavanaugh's house and protected.
H3 Podcast
"cavanaugh" Discussed on H3 Podcast
"Have hired by the way self report. Use seem to know a lot about hiring and the cost of having faked dummy accounts. Mr ryan bitch ass cavanaugh. Indeed indeed which. Maybe we'll reveal something more about that and we. We may have some information about that. Actually but maybe we have enough to talk about today. already sound rejection and confession. I have never hired. Its single dummy count. I am dummy. And i left a review so i am. I guess. There's one dummy account me. But i'm sorry people don't like half. Those aren't fake statements. Grow your app sucks. It's flipped your own guy. Said he goes. You're reading your own fake reviews. Okay sick weirdo. I would never do that so flipped. And then he says clearly. I'm very unhappy and disturbed human. Excuse me i don't have to do is and I not being sued by my nanny. And i've never lied under oath bitch ass. What's this headline here. Deadline relativity fabricated memo claiming sexual harassment against former co president. Adam feels judd's awards eight point four million. What was the name on. That edited That forged memo who was at less edited by cav. Cab driver cab jar rule would call it that we're not making a judgment rule calls. It fraud does. Jar rule knows a lot about the topic. Gyro doesn't speak for us. Of course gyro speaks for himself and his views. Do not represent that of atri.
America First with Sebastian Gorka Podcast
Sebastian Gorka and Lord Conrad Black Discuss NY Gov. Cuomo's Resignation
"Your reaction to the strange quasar resignation. Because he's not going for fourteen days of the governor of new york well. I don't blame them for for two week. Lists i understand. He has no home except the governance. Meant i understand that he wouldn't want to move to a hotel Particularly one in state that he's just retiring governor but Look i think that the these complaints of these women are they have to be looked into. And but i. I have reservations about trial by the nunciatures. I mean these things. Don't sound looked better than some things like that after nonsense that we raised against justice. Cavanaugh but I i don't like any just been driven out on the say so of another party particularly parties that have been silent for some time. And they're just coming when it's a a not not particularly difficult and rather a faddish thing to do now. I want to be clear. I'm not making light of what happened if if what is alleged happened. It said raging disgraceful. But i i want a little process here with that. Said i think the the whole problem is handling of The elderly koba catalyses was is terribly serious. Business and i agree that the way it was just whitewashed as a by all means in that as an anything else give him and everyone else a fair trial but just saying there's nothing here to pursue investigation struck me as a political Cover up and then as the consolation prize they they put across the less damning questions terribly serious but less damn not matters of life and death but complain it women are but and and so i mean i just don't think it's all that satisfactory with that said the only argument i think out against governor. Cuomo resigning is the mayor de bless demand
The Charlie Kirk Show
Lindsay Graham Is a Handmaiden to the Left
"Systems like ours institutional conservatism produced. People like lindsey graham. You know who are. Basically the leaders are basically fragile. The really good at performing giving some three minute performance in judiciary committee hearing on behalf of a supreme court nominee. Who were all supposed to believe is gonna save us right bret. Kavanagh's gonna save us. I mean i never thought that. They one springboard. I don't wanna system. Which supreme court makes these kinds of decisions. That's not democracy. Second i never thought brett cab not single super impressive. I hope he is never seen it to me. But lindsey graham who is absolutely elastic. I mean just like full-blown fundamental his assumptions with the same as the american left because he got out and start streaming on television for three minutes in defense of bread cavanaugh conservative institutions allowed themselves to ignore his actual behavior which is working as a handmaiden to the
Pod Save America
"cavanaugh" Discussed on Pod Save America
"Twice. Became worse became worse. That's a really good job. Sorry everybody just a good joke. It's just funny to tell a joke from the perspective of the democrats trying to stop them like you to make me better. You made me worse. I think that's great good for him. It's also just such a fuck you to this. Susan collins of the world right who said oh after the first impeachment. He's gonna he's gonna learn his lesson right and it's it's it's a reminder also think of why the only thing that works with trump is taking away his power deterrence doesn't work appeasement doesn't work ignoring him doesn't work right only thing. That works is beating him. That's the only thing he understand. And and i. It's worth noting that the that was a what he was he was comparing himself to. Bill barr his attorney general. Bill barr who was a supplicant. To donald trump. For virtually all the time he was attorney. General believes in basically unlimited presidential. Power did a ton to to to to. What's it called in football and you block for somebody. Run blocking sure. Run blocking pass blocking run blocking for him. What kind of player we like. It's when somebody's in front of somebody with the ball. Kind of like i'm bill. Barr was the fullback in this. Now option your blocks buck you nailed it the first time you put in the comments. There's more specific thing and he the point is what's the lesson here is he is he is again. He is now saying that. Bill barr gaunt. He's few still fears that that atlantic bill barr mcconnell kind of betrayed him on behalf of the democrats not because they thought it was an up because he was doing what he thought. Was you know a hint of the right thing but because it was a part of the deeper betrayal by the same thing with brick kavanagh right. We majoring bright cavanaugh. And he said oh well because brad. Cavanaugh was almost not confirmed because the democrats went after him that's why he didn't vote to believe it. Of course he said that's why he voted with the democrats as if if everything is like an election a competition when he really meant that like the supreme court rejected the absurd fucking claims from donald trump in his right crack legal team about voter fraud. He said bill barr got intimidated by an impeachment threat. Out of doing a whole bunch of things punching a bunch of enemies including I guess arresting. He said the women who slandered and defamed brad kavanagh so like the people came forward to accuse break. Cavanaugh of sexual assault trump suggested in. This speech should have been punished in some way. It was really a dark fucked up and the whole point. He was making his dark. Which is democrats play tough. They don't play nice and maybe now we need to play. Yeah matt we can't. We shouldn't get up. We tried to burn the fucking cabaret. I thought that was tough. But that's why it's so fucking scary. He's telling them like no no they still play dirtier we gotta match them. That was the point of that part of the and also he. He went on that. You know obviously ige thinks cavenaugh was mistreated during hearings and then he makes the point that the reason that the conservative scream court is actually behaving like a democratic court is the threat of court packing because he can't allow even that they have any kind of power. You can't tell this audience like at least we have. The supreme court ruled to protect voting rights. On behalf there are the trailer and everything's grievance and you'll win yes that's right that's exactly right. There's there's one more clip that's that's kind of funny. Where trump admits something about polling. Play that now. If it's bad. I i say.
600 WREC
"cavanaugh" Discussed on 600 WREC
"Arcane. Subject that would not be relevant to our day to day discussions. It was never intended to be such a central focus of the public's attention. But then again Neither was politics. The judiciary and the last step in that journey, the final arbiter. The Supreme Court has become increasingly important to our day to day lives, and that is troubling. Nevertheless, it is reality. One of the individuals who follows that probably closer than anyone. He's a very well respected, uh analysts, Reviewer Observer commenter on the Supreme Court. As our very own professor Josh Blackman. He's written a piece in Newsweek entitled Conservative Justices Warn Cavanaugh and Bear It lack fortitude. Fortitude in quotes, Professor. We were promised that Kavanaugh and bear it Um good conservative justices. We're going to add to the conservatism of the Vin Scalia now Clarence Thomas Court. Why didn't that happen? Is this a deceptive trade practices where we defrauded? Are these people exactly who they thought we were or have they changed? You know, Cavanaugh's exactly who I thought he was Barrett. I wasn't entirely sure she'd only been a judge for a year or two. Um, but I think what we're seeing already is that the conservatives in the quarter splitting in half You have the super Conservative wing with Justice Thomas Justice Alito and Justice Gorsuch is there, I think, for the most part And then you have this sort of middle conservatives. You have the chief justice, who I think is a lost cause. And then you have justice Kavanaugh, who wrote the chief justice quite a bit. And then the newest member, Amy Coney, Barrett, Regrettably, seen speed lining up with the way she thinks about how to handle controversial cases. So you know, deceptive practice. You know, I think the There were red flags being raised at this early juncture. I want to quote directly from your piece in Newsweek. You say? Twice this term. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch warned that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett lack Backbone. That is what happened that The left attacked Cavanaugh and bear it so much during their nomination process that they're afraid to be who, intellectually. They should be. How much of an impact do you think that had? I think this was always a Cavanaugh was. He was always very concerned about public relations. Now the media perceives him. I'm not sure about Barrett. But I I think without question the sort of excoriation that was ridiculed they went through in public. Has to have an impact upon them, and that's it recognized how much it hurts them and their family. When when they were the mainstream media just destroys them in public, and I I have to imagine Michael that works in the back of your mind. I mean, your public figure you're criticizing on a daily basis. You probably never given moment thought about it, but But not everyone has the backbone of Michael Barry. Right. Some people are affected by the some one way or another. Well, let me quote from, uh, I assumed this was dicta in one of these cases. I don't know if it was the majority opinion. But you say, um conservative trio wrote that the two newest justices were quote Unwilling to bear the criticism that denying the prisoners appeal would inevitably Illicit. Unwilling to bear the criticism that denying the prisoners appeal would inevitably illicit. Where are we win a justice? Is afraid to rule as his peers think he would have ruled because he doesn't want criticism. I mean, I go back to the days of the Brethren, I go back to the days of the justice who who lives you know, behind a concrete wall, a Chinese wall of of public opinion and and it's sort of immune from that he's holding forth as he's supposed to. And not out there. What I guess the problem is, you can't get the speaking fees and write the same books. If you write unpopular opinions, maybe Well, look, I think Justice Kavanaugh in life being liked. He liked to be a member of the accepted class in D. C. I think that he wants that sort of recognition, which has had for many years. You know, Justice Barrett comes from the breadbasket. She's from Indiana. She's in the middle. But still, I think she has a, uh, a streak of restraint and her that she doesn't want to upset things. I'm not sure if it's for fear of negative press coverage. I think Chris has a So far a little bit timidity, timid approach that that has been surprising, especially since she was so defiant when they tried to destroy her in the Senate, But she's just been all timid so far. You note that only time will tell whether Justices Cavanaugh and Barrett will sidle up to Chief Justice John Roberts, PR based jurisprudence or whether they will stand on their constitutional Principles. That is As damning a statement as I can imagine, veiled in a velvet glove and and that to me is the real challenge here is, Are they going to do what is right or are they going to do what is popular? I think of the vice, uh, President of the Minneapolis City Council last week. Who's leaving a parade? And she's blocked in by the, uh, antifa and BLM goons and you know she's as left wing as they get, And she says, Whatever you all want, Just let me go. She was, she said. I'm being held hostage. It kind of feels like that's what these folks are. They're being held hostage by a mob of their own making. It's true, they have life tender for reason. Right Judges are given job protections. They're not responsive to popular opinion. Hamilton in the Federalist Papers wrote about this more than 200 years ago, he said judges should not consult popularity. They rely on the law and nothing but the law and that's why I asked them. Who cares if your opinions are unpopular? It doesn't matter. You have life tenure. They can't They can't remove you. They can't fire. They can't cut your salary. If Democrats want to make the Supreme Court has 50 members let them let them destroy that's on them. Not on you..
Mark Levin
Eric Trump Says Manhattan DA and Democrat Party Are Vindictive People
"People. They tried to take down Cavanaugh. They tried to destroy his life with which lies and Mistruth, and they can't help themselves. They can't help themselves. So now you have a situation where my father is out of politics. He's hinting very, very, very strongly, and that might be an understatement that he wants to run again and 2024 you have a president who is absolutely destroying this country, the borders and mess everything about this country right now is a mess under under his failed policies. You have Donald Trump probably stronger than ever with the Republican base because people are Really seeing what they miss. In comparison. They see this as they see the Democratic Party is being a wild radical party. So guess what they do they weaponized New York prosecutors to come after everybody My father knows So starting four years ago, they start sending hundreds of subpoenas. They have 3.5 million documents that our company has had to send over to them. And after four years and literally mark hundreds of people, I mean the entire Da's office in New York, right after 44 years, 3.5 million documents, hundreds and hundreds of subpoenas. 2025 people, you know, witnesses going into speaking to them. You know what they have They have a man who has a corporate car. And he didn't pay taxes on a corporate vehicle. And, you know, the interesting thing is Ivan showed up in the courtroom the other day. And guess what he showed up in, he showed up in a government vehicle. I wonder. I wonder if he's declaring that as income markets a joke. It's a travesty of justice. Believe me, Alan Westerberg wasn't the fish that they wanted to catch here with Donald Trump, and they went through every tax return you've had since 2000 and five They couldn't find a single thing. And so guess what they go after And the score guy who is a phenomenal human beings. They want to destroy his life. But this is the Democratic Party city mark this This is what these people do, They'll do anything they can to keep their power. The sad thing is New York Burns right now. I mean,
H3 Podcast
"cavanaugh" Discussed on H3 Podcast
"I rate him. he's definitely wants stoppers anyway. Ilan spar listen guys. This guy is fucking with my life. This guy is suing me. He's fucking with my life over some bullshit. I can't wait to talk about literally for free. Speech fair using his fight sucked. Which did jake. Paul spent asterix. Oh this guy's a piece of fucking shit and well that's just my. That's just my opinion. His partner thinks is partner. Suing running a ponzi scheme. Ilan sabar filed suit in los angeles superior court on thursday alleging. The cabinet persuaded him to go into business under false pretense. While working at cantor fitzgerald spar had developed an idea for stock exchange which buyers could take equity and film projects in two thousand eighteen cavenaugh. Fresh from the second bankruptcy of relativity media. Sounds like a stellar ceo. I'm sure that trailers in good hands told spar he had a six million dollar commitment to invest in the project. According to the lawsuit cavanaugh also claimed to have hundreds of millions of dollars in commitment to finance a slate of films under his new company. Proxima media spark came to discover that that was not true. The suit alleges. That's literally what the fire festival guy did. Very similar very similar it had virtually no capital. He said it had no viable financial commitment. Certainly nothing approaching the magnitude of what was presented over time as cavenaugh withdrew and replace one funding proposal. After another in each of lies expose. It became apparent to spar that cavanaugh was operating proxima and its related entities as essentially a ponzi scheme using meager new investment capital to satisfy old debts diverting corporate funds for personal use roof instead of paying employ. Oh yeah he's hitting that mario we. Instead of paying his employees and contractors and manipulating the corporate books to and records to conceal his misrepre disco should be in jail by the sound of. It shouldn't be suing me. She'd be in jail. One was this Article like long from two thousand nineteen june seventh. So that's probably still working. Its way through the courts. Oh.
H3 Podcast
"cavanaugh" Discussed on H3 Podcast
"There's no video geez. They must have tied his grandma or something. But like your grandma. Salted says you can prank kidnapping isis. She's about to be beheaded russian. Clean their dude. I don't know man. People are watching us. Mcbroom watching that. I got problem with the internet. I know makes it even better guess who sponsored that video who pretell fucking trailer trailer. By the way david the only company that would touch him with a ten foot pole right now is trailer trailer ryan kavanagh the people that are suing me for my expression of free speech. David dobra who literally just who like filmed someone being assayed and put it online trailers like this is a good time to get a deal so much like is trying to make a statement rank. Cavanaugh tell me what's up you. You're sponsoring jake paul new york times. You know pretty clear allegations on that one our word brittany times credible vapor and then david novak. It's like ryan kavanagh. Are you trying to make a statement that you support. Sas what did ryan kavanagh allegedly do again. I can't recall. Oh so rank cavanaugh. He's the owner of trailer. He was the ceo of like a big Forget the name of it but he liked. They went bank like super banned relativity. The media maybe super bankrupt and then he like got trailer involved and like he was accused of running a ponzi scheme. Oh he's got a really dark history. I read this all mine. This not me saying this right. this is all allegedly. Who was it. That accused of burning upon gaming. It was his ex partner. Oh he probably knew him pretty well. Oh yeah this. Rank has a piece of shit and so of course he would Support david dobric and jake ball. It's like he's trying to make a statement trailers such shit apted. He linked it do thrillers. Such a ghost down. This app is dog shit even if you go to their homepage like the videos on the homepage have like no views. Six hundred likes this is what's on the homepage. And they're paying all these people.
Mark Levin
The Obamacare Decision by SCOTUS Shows They Are Cowards
"The obamacare decision by the Supreme Court today is expected. And I'll tell you why not, for reasons so called legal analysts have to say. Because once these unconstitutional laws take hold They're almost impossible to undo. So the Supreme Court by 5 to 4 with Justice Roberts, the chief justice, flipping Wasn't 12 years ago. Turning into a tax case. He wrote The, uh, really the the law into, uh And for two forever Ville. And so no challenge will ever upset it. And Justice. Alito's dissent was brilliant. Gorsuch joined with him. We got all this head counting going on on T V. You know what? But they don't get at any of the substance, of course. This was a tax case. That's what the Supreme Court turned it into. And then when the tax issue Was repealed on the individual mandate by Congress. Suddenly, it's not a tax case anymore. Suddenly it's a standing case. So the Supreme Court turned itself three times. Now on this law, Obamacare into a pretzel. And those lawyers who really are not constitutional lawyers, but maybe their former federal prosecutors or former defense lawyers. Maybe I don't know. Former bankruptcy laws or whatever this is how they use their green eyeshades. And so that's that's not what's going on here. These justices are demonstrating over and over and over again. What a bunch of cowards there. Comey Cavanaugh really, so far disasters. Hopefully, that will change over
WIBC 93.1FM
"cavanaugh" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM
"On that. So you replace Cavanaugh or Cavanaugh replaced Kennedy again. You're just holding part. You're just breaking even the game changer. Woz. Maybe Tony Barrett, replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg, because as much as all of us respected Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and we're sorry to see her pass. She was no friend of Second Amendment. So suddenly you have someone very strong onto a replacing someone who is very very. And if they're my I don't want state this too strongly. I don't wanna be disrespectful. But let's just say with no fan of the Second Amendment, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that's a game changer, meaning you can rule lose John Roberts. Still win 5 to 4. He can vote with the Liberals against the Second Amendment and you still win. That's a game changer. And that's why I think you're seeing that. Case being taken up now. But I'll tell Kelly, my buddy Kelly and Avon has called. We got the other people a couple other people on hold. We're gonna take a break here at the bottom of the air will come back. We'll go back to the phones. I want to go into what's going on with constitutional carrion taxes. Even if I have time, I'm going to go into some description. Of this ghost gun issue that the 80 F is Proposing new regulations on there's a lot of confusion about that. A lot of misinformation we have time we'll get into that as well. But we'll go back to the phone lines when we come back from this break. Give us a call. Join the discussion. 317239 93 93 317239 93 93. We're taking a break. This is guy Relford on the gun guys show on 93 WNBC. Tony Katz. Taxation of.
WBZ Afternoon News
Senator claims FBI's Kavanaugh investigation may have been "fake"
"House of Rhode Island has a new request for Attorney General Merrick Garland and new letter Tonight he wants the attorney general to look into the FBI investigation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh back in 2018 before Cavanaugh was confirmed to serve on the high court. This is a circus. I will not be intimidated into withdrawing from this process during the confirmation process cabin all fought back against sexual assault allegations dating back decades. The FBI investigated those claims, but wrote Island, Senator Sheldon White House wants newly confirmed Attorney General Merrick Garland to take a second look into the FBI's probe. In a letter White House writes, it appeared to have been a politically constrained and perhaps fake FBI investigation into alleged misconduct by Kavanaugh. The senator says the bureau wasn't willing to accept testimony from some witnesses calling that unique behavior in a statement to WBC news radio, the FBI would not common. Laurie, curvy
Bloomberg Radio New York
"cavanaugh" Discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York
"You know he's doing what doing way love being outdoors. Was riding a snow mobile with a friend when they were hit by the Avalanche. I'm Brian should You're listening to Bloomberg Law With Jeweled Russell from Bloomberg Radio. I've been talking to Professor Rick Karr. Net of Notre Dame all school about a divided Supreme Court ordering California to let indoor worship services resume and a group of suing churches in a 6 to 3 decision, the court rule for religious rites and ordered California to allow indoor church services to resume at a group of churches who were suing. Easing restrictions that state officials said were necessary to stem the spread of the Corona virus. Under restrictions imposed in July by Governor Gavin Newsom, California barred indoor worship services as well as indoor dining, movie screenings and other gatherings in counties designated as Tier one because of Hiko Vin numbers. The order stopped short of abolishing the covert restrictions altogether, saying the state could impose a 25% capacity cap it church services, and the justices also allowed California to continue to ban singing and chanting at indoor services. The justices split four ways in the case on one end, Justices Clarence Thomas and Neal Gorsuch said they would have blocked all of the restrictions. On the other end. Justice Elena Kagan, Steven Brier in Sonia Sotomayor said they would have left all the restrictions in place. The court's order reinforces an earlier Supreme Court decision that blocks trick capacity limits in New York as violating constitutionally protected religious rites. This is Justice. Amy Cockney barrettes first separate opinions and she's been on the bench and it was joined by Justice Brett Kavanaugh. So why did she write a separate opinion? Yeah, it's very technical point. Her view and just Cavanaugh agreed, was that they didn't have enough evidence. The record is wasn't developed enough to be able to conclude That the limits on singing that were being applied to religious gatherings were neutral that this is a basic requirement. Federal constitutional laws that religious exercise can't be singled out for worse treatment than comparable secular activities. And one of the arguments in this case was that well, you know, people are allowed to sing inside another context, you can thing in your house. And there was some question about whether in the entertainment industry and the recording industry that people were still being allowed to Being indoors. But Justus parents point We just We don't have enough evidence yet to be able to say that California's treating secular singing better than religious scenes. So she in Kavanaugh and then by extension, the three more liberal justices to Willing to leave in place the limits on indoor singing as part of these gatherings. Ah, lot of people are pointing to this opinion. And saying, Oh, Justice Bharat. Maybe she's not as conservative as we thought. She's not as conservative as Clarence Thomas, for example. Yeah, I've heard some of that. I guess I would just urge people to think critically about these labels and how they apply the cases involving fundamental rights. It's not obvious to me that it's conservative rather than the rule to want to protect religious exercise rights. And in the other point, we just be that the disagreement that justice spirit and just Cavanaugh had with just a score, such as opinion is not a particularly big one of all nine justices, including justice, Kegan. They all agree that religious exercise is important, and they all agree that government hand target religious activities for burdensome regulations. Disagreement really has to do with the amount of difference the court should give to government officials when government officials claim that regulations are necessary and the disagreement is just about which activities are really comparable to others in the church service, more like a concert, or is it more like going to home Depot? That kind of thing? These disagreements are their significant, but I don't believe they're dramatic ideological differences. They reflect, Maura. I think Just a difference of opinion about how to interpret the factual record. You know, I think when I see injustice Paris opinion is not an attack on what, Just of course, which is saying, But it's just coming to a different conclusion. A different inference about some disputed facts. And now what about Justice Roberts opinion? We'll take him to be pretty much on the same page as Justices Barrett and Cavanaugh that is Some of the California he goes out of his way to say yes, of course, it's true that deference to public Officials, especially when you're dealing with an emergency is important. And of course, it's true that you know, in in good judicial conservative style that judges shouldn't be in the business of thinking that they can second guess all policy decisions so he wants to do you want to make that very clear? But then he just he points to the kind of extreme out liar nature of California's reflection that That, you know, even in the the huge Los Angeles Catholic Cathedral, which could seat you know, thousands of people. You still can't have any in person worship? He just does. He doesn't think that the record reflects California's actually exercising. Epidemiology, Epidemiological, uh, judgment, but instead, it just kind of again doing a rubber stamp and taking the easy way out and imposing a blanket restriction. So that's why, um Hi. He does when he does. He wants to make a very clearly doesn't think judges can or should micromanage local governments, responses to diseases. Um But again, he's being down a marker that at some point, judicial scrutiny is crucial when you have regulations that appeared to be disregarding fundamental rights. Justice Elena Kagan wrote an opinion for the Liberals, and it was really impassioned and seemed to be critical of her colleagues or conservative colleagues. In a way she doesn't usually do. Justice. Kagan is a great writer has always and I do think it was a certain amount of passion and kind of urgency that comes through in her dissent. I don't think it crossed any lines in terms of not being respectful. I mean, I think she tends to always observe that line but basically hurt. Disagreement is not on the importance of religious exercise. You know, she opens her opinion by saying, Yeah, of course, you can't treat religious exercise worse than you treat comparable secular activities. But her two main themes are first we should beam or deferential to California state officials. And again. This is a disagreement with Gorsuch, who's saying looking yes, Some difference is important, but we're talking about fundamental rights. We don't just defer to the cops. When it comes to you know whether or not they have toe respect, 4th, 5th and 6th Amendment rights. And so he wants to spend sister. We can't just defer to the government when it says that these regulations are necessary for the first disagreement is on the theme of difference. She thinks the course not being deferential enough, and she has several lines and paragraphs where she kind of challenges. You kind of poke the justices, but they're being activist and the second history would have to do with the comparison points. She thinks church services. Indoor religious gatherings are not comparable to things like going to the Home depot going shopping going to a grocery store, and so on. So she thinks the religious gatherings are not being treated worse than comparable secular gatherings. Whereas the justices who were in the majority did think that religious gatherings are being treated worse, in my own view, I don't think justice Kagan took enough account of justice Gorsuch is Point that California doesn't seem to have been very flexible that again. If you're worried about singing indoors, and it seems to be the bed is something to worry about. You can simply say no singing during religious gathering, or if you're worried about people like close proximity you can require distancing again. Just discourses concern was California kind of taken the easy way out. Just the blanket, No gatherings proposal and he doesn't want to defer to that. But Justice Kagan death. The case seems to be following the New York case last November, after Justice Bharat joined the court in which the court barred capacity limits on houses of worship. Ah, change of direction from prior cases on that issue and more expansive of religious rights. So do you see this case as being a step further? I don't think it's so much a step further from the Brooklyn case, But I do think that these covert restriction cases as a general matter have been fascinating because they do suggest I think that the court's free exercise doctrine is moving from where itwas, you know, 30 years ago in the famous Smith case. It does suggest, And this is relevant to the upcoming Gardocki adoption case. The Fulton case then that you've been following. It appears that you know, there's a majority of justices who are willing.
860AM The Answer
"cavanaugh" Discussed on 860AM The Answer
"You for such I want to tell you, Cavanaugh. You have released the world Wind on you right? You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions, and as Senator Paul said that they were rebuked. Uh, serious humor that majority leader was rebuked, which is not occur much by chief Justice Roberts because those remarks Sure doesn't look Senator Paul's absolutely correct on this. If if this standard is going to apply to one side in politics, it has to apply to the other and look Jordan. I actually think there's a reason that both of those types of speeches are probably protected is because we're supposed to have an atmosphere where you can engage in vigorous debate. It's vigorous debate that actually rubs the rough edges off of an idea. I mean, that's sort of the whole idea and, of course, We've advocated many times on this program for the outcome to actually be merit based on for the best ideas to rise and some time there should be a bipartisan consensus, But the way you get there, Jordan is not suppression speech. The way you get there is engaging in rigorous debate. But look, if you're going to attack it on one side, then the other side is gonna have to abide by that standard as well. And Senator Schumer. Jordan. He fell short of that standard folks were only 1800 ft people away from signing our petition to get to two or 50,000 or two or 48,200 to sign that petition. A C l j dot org's right now, this is an unconstitutional trial. We're going to get it to all those centers. We're gonna break it down by state as well. So they know the people in their state that agree. This is unconscious. Tuchel trial of a private U. S citizen is not within the jurisdiction.
NewsRadio KFBK
"cavanaugh" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK
"Such I want to tell you, Cavanaugh. You have released the world wind on you. Okay, Right. I gotta been talked about the president's candidate, and I said, if you see him anywhere at a restaurant in a department store, even at a gasoline station, just tell him you're not well. Come here. Please don't just come here today and then go home. Go to the hill today. Get up in threes Get up in the face of some Congress people. Yeah. So get up in the face of some Congress feel people have his Cory Booker Maxine Waters in your face get in their face. Schumer having a cow about the two justices Gorsuch and Cavanaugh, saying you're going to pay for it. So come on. Eyes, political rhetoric. It's I think it's juvenile, but it is what they do. So this is all going to start tomorrow and Andy McCarthy. Former DOJ Says. As far as the process goes. You said this kind of uncertain what this impeachment process will look like. It's possible. It doesn't sound like they're heading in this direction. But there's a rule of the Senate that would allow the Senate to basically handed off to a committee to conduct What would look like a trial. For.
WIBC 93.1FM
"cavanaugh" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM
"I'm on my flagship in Indianapolis and wi bc. We started with Biden Inauguration We actually played it in full played the flight the full hour. And some people like I'm not listening to that propaganda. It's the inauguration of president of the United States. If that's propaganda, I can't help you. But the idea that I wouldn't share it when I share everything I shared the Cavanaugh hearings in full I shared the impeachment conversations in full. When Trump does one of those chopper pressers. I share them to the extent you could hear them in full. It's what I do. And I know amongst other radio host. Some people think I'm just back wrapped nuts for doing so. I believe you have to hear people in their own words so we can all decide. What did we actually here? You might hear one thing and I hear another thing, and that's interesting. You share it with me, and I share it with you. And that's the way it should work. Give you my opinion on it, Not based on some opinion that others think you might want to hear. But what my opinion is, I am on record more than once and interviews and other places. I don't believe that anybody listens to this show. At all. I don't believe I have a single listener or fan or friend or part of this group that we are. Who listens to the show because they want to be told what to think. Rather, I think people listen to the show because they want something to think about. I absolutely not only believe that to be fact. But it is how I operate. It is how I operate, knowing that we have a much different audience of much more engaged group of people, people who are absolutely thinking for themselves. But don't always get to get all the news and thank God someone will actually do that for them, because if they had to listen, the news themselves they go out of their minds. And then give a thought to what it is that everyone's talking about that maybe they haven't thought about before. Write something share the kitchen table. You know, I heard this from Tony Cats. I thought this was interesting. What do you think? And I'm doing that. I'm doing my job. And none of that was to say, Hey, let's mollify satisfy spoon feed an audience can't be spoon fed. I'm not anything about to try because that'd be insane. I would also find it remarkably boring. The difference. Between me and Fox News on that night. That there was no problem with challenges. I wait till they go through. You know what we got? President Biden. Rational people like you and me do things What Fox did that night was a mistake. It wasn't about speaking freely. It wasn't about standing up. No. It was a poor presentation. And a real Not thinking about the audience. Not even thinking about maybe that their own corps now maybe they see it differently. What I know is changes upon changes. Bon changes are happening. I don't know what any of the mean or what they're going to bring. The only thing I can ascertain thus far is that I don't think they're done yet. I don't know where the audience is finally going to settle. Let's give you one of the really interesting conversations of 2021. Meanwhile, I still think they've got great people over Fox. People who I appreciate, and I'm happy to have the opportunity to work with what I do. And when I get the opportunity again, I will. I feel the same way about the people have been so supportive as at Newsmax. Been really, really something else to spend some time over there. I'm Tony Katz. You don't have to miss any part of Tony Cats today. Solve that problem by subscribing to the podcast at rumble dot com. Rumble is a video sharing service like the tube guys, but they aren't playing around with the monetizing of the platform in content..
News Talk 1130 WISN
"cavanaugh" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN
"An I Heart radio Podcast preview when John Coastal Sharon's mom called him with some bad news, she said, Oh, you know, I burned today I burned my hand and it's really bad. He was worried. It looked like wrinkled skin to the skin. Got blisters to the skin came off. Then John had an idea. He flew his mother to California, and they went to a clinic where she got Stem cells and just like that, her hands started to get better. It even cured her arthritis. What it was like changing for me. Really love changing aside from yelling at him for John's mom, the treatment worked across the country in Texas, Elaine Dilly tried to help her mother with stem cells, just like John had done. My husband and I would do anything to help her, but she would not be so lucky. No one we're here. Emergency. What's going on seeing and then sails in her back in next class Wednesday, huh? She can't lose. Were you afraid? That you were gonna lose her. I knew I scandal loser to patients to mothers who place their hopes and the promise of a miracle cure and these two are connected. But not in the way you might expect. What you find out the truth of the whole story. You just really can't believe anybody anymore from wondering the network behind Dr Death and over my dead body comes a new story. Bad batch. Even sorry. Listen and follow this podcast for free on the I heart radio app number one for music, radio and podcasts, all in one. The Dean's list with Janice Dean, a seven year old from Maryland who wants to help others makes today's Dean's list. Cavanaugh Bell says he's been bullied in school. But rather than let the mean kids get him down. He wants to help others instead on his go fund me page, he writes after I was bullied, I felt a darkness inside of me. I knew I didn't want other Kids to feel the same way. So I asked my mom if she could help me spread love and positivity. The more I give back to my community, the more I want to keep doing it. He started with his own savings and began putting together and giving out care packages filled with food and toiletries for elderly neighbors. It was so popular that he and his mom started a food pantry in a space donated by a local warehouse. Not only does he help in humanitarian work, but Cavanaugh has also launched a nonprofit to combat bullying and spread positivity through acts of Kindness. Thank you for inspiring so many and helping others. Cavanaugh you made today's Dean's list. Janice Dean Fox News. Broadcasting live from Planet Madison, where everything is beyond parody. This is the Vicki McKenna show to be a part of the program in Madison called 321. 13. 10 Statewide Call Toll free at 877235 13 10 Now here's Vicki McKenna. Good afternoon. Welcome to the program. I am thinking McKenna. This is Vicki McKenna show. We're gonna talk about the awful Covert Bill Tony ever says he wants to sign that's coming up on the program. We're also going to talk about the Democrats trying to force a private radio station to cancel Conservative show. No, not this one. But we'll tell you about that coming up on the program as well. In Wisconsin. This is happening in Wisconsin in the western part of the state. S O. That's ahead on the program before we get into anything. No. As I was listening to the news. You know the impeachment the Senate is going to take up impeachment. Happily, someone a federal judge has finally weighed in on this. So what is gonna happen? You have the house. It's decided to impeach President Trump on the bogus charge of inciting a riot. We can now actually we have a timeline now. That proves that charges, in fact, bogus Um, the president's speech was 20 minutes away from being concluded. The crowd was a mile and a quarter away. When there was Mayhem breaking out and it was organized mayhem a little bit more on that. As the show goes on. But so so the timeline disproves the allegation of inciting or instigating a riot by the president. So this is this is political theater. It's bogus. We you know it is That I have to pretend that it's serious. But again, this will be all consuming. I guess nobody actually cares about the fact that the president elect of the United States is putting into positions of power. People who have already shown a history of destabilizing of being destabilizing influences for national security. But who the hell cares about that, right? Who cares about covert? Who cares about any of this other stuff? We have to impeach a president That isn't even going to be in office when the impeachment proceedings go on, and you can't do it. All right? That's the punch line on this. You can't actually do it. I am going to quote former U. S. Court of Appeals Judge J. Michael Luttig. Someone who served a long time in the Reagan and George W. Bush administrations, He says this it appears that even if the House of Representatives impeaches president Trump the Senate trial on that impeachment will not begin until after Trump has left office. And President elect Biden has become president on January 20th that Senate trial would be unconstitutional. Mitch McConnell has just confirmed that the trial would not be until after Joe Biden is inaugurated. Judge Let it continues the sequencing of the House impeachment proceedings before Trump's departure from office and the inauguration of the new president, followed by a Senate impeachment trial. What raises the question of whether a former president can be impeached after he leaves office? The Constitution itself answers this question. Clearly, no, he cannot be once Trump's term ends on January, 20th. Congress loses its constitutional authority to continue impeachment proceedings against him, even if the House is already improved articles of impeachment. Therefore, if the House of representatives were impeached, were to impeach the president before he leaves office. The Senate could not thereafter convict the former president and disqualify him under the Constitution from future public office. If the trial takes place after inauguration, the case cannot come.
WIBC 93.1FM
"cavanaugh" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM
"Rubber bullets. It has been interesting listening and hearing you making attempts to justify it. 45 did encourage this and no amount of your Bs. Can change that. What a complete idiot. But this actually goes back to what we were talking about with Camilla and Biden and the statements that they put out yesterday, right? I mean, this is all people actually believe. This. This is super super different. You know what I mean? It's insane to me. So I was actually in my car when I got this message, and I was I did the toll talk to text you know, like thing with my phone because I was so I couldn't wait to get to the office to respond. I was so completely irritated by this idiot. So I did respond to me. Oh, and I said People forget this. I said good, like common, Joe. We're like, Oh, yeah, I mean, peaceful protesters in the summer were handled totally different than the insane. You know, writers of the capital and again, there's still staying with the peaceful protest line. So I said. Woman literally got shot to death by police at the capital on Wednesday. You absolute idiot. Violence is not okay. No matter the cause Cavanaugh protesters busting and we're fine to you. I suppose the deaths and mayhem caused by BLM riots far exceeded Wednesday's damage, but was totally fine with you, you absolute hypocrite. Wow. And he responded. Nice try deflect again. What you are famous for? Whoever mentioned that violence is okay at any time adults. I was just one giant sadness. And I was like, that was the comparison there was unacceptable violence from BLM and unacceptable violence on Wednesday. That is how they compare. There's no deflection. There's just willful ignorance on your part to accept reality. Hope you listened to the show today since you will have a starring role in it, e Don't know. We talked about this before about how you are ferocious to everyone who comes at you. And my favorite thing was totally yesterday was perfect. Some Rando who by the way Look, It's one thing to be mad at a government official right because that person can impact your life, so it's one thing to tweet it them. You know, Tom, how much you don't like. You know, the these people can impact your life, so that's one thing but to do this to a radio show. Or a radio station at which any time you can avoid it by just not turning that channel And then you admit you listen to the radio station all day. And how much you hate. It may be the issues. You know, I just can't this getting over that Some guy did that yesterday. And you within? I don't know how long it was. It was a very short period of time. We're so Intense and ferocious with this poor guy that he cried uncle. He's tapping out. He's in a Brock Lesner chokehold saying, That's it I give. It was like woman Next time. Don't frigging tag US. If you don't want If you don't want me to respond, then don't tag me. Alright. Listen with some good ma'am, Please start. Hi, Maiken, Rob. I tuned into your show today as I do every day. And in the third hour Rob said something which really resonated with me. It's every day, but just glad she clarified. What we gotta wait. Gotta get up in your ego President closer. It doesn't say that anywhere. I rob. You said something like They want people to believe. That any person Left who dares to support trump Anything. Trump is an outcast in his alone. You're not alone. I really appreciate the sentiment. It's comforting. It's validating. It's reassuring. I do believe that part of the leftist agenda is to as you also touched on. Oh, Rob, you just hit every department touch myself. I'm sorry Group could certainly people in the categories. Racist, white nationalist, homophobic, etcetera. Call them the enemy and then cut them out of the conversation. It's a dangerous game. And it's fracturing friends and family relationships. And effectively isolated individuals who do not keep actively working to preserve their connections to others. Today Your words gave me hope, hope that there are still enough conservatives left to come together and make meaningful change. You guys are awesome. Thank you for the informative and humorous way You discuss politics and current events. I look forward to your banter every day. So, so, so many people appreciate what you do. Keep fighting the good fight Nicole. I.
WDRC
"cavanaugh" Discussed on WDRC
"The peaceful part of it. I thoroughly endorsed breaking into the Capitol building, wrecking offices and, of course, the situation that set up the murder the killing of a young lady. She was shot by a D. C cop, and that's now being investigated. And I was thinking about over the last 12 months. We've seen two messages come from the political elites. Elites in America. One is When mobs take to the streets of American cities like Antifa and BLM, and they riot and they commit arson, and they loot stores. And in some cases, they end up killing people on doing terrible crimes against people that all of the political left. Says What we have to listen to that mob. We have to take them seriously yesterday. Part of the larger group of peaceful protesters broke into the Capitol building. As I said that was wrong. It was it actually created a lot of chaos, and it did a lot of damage inside a building that belongs to all of us. Having said it's wrong. All of a sudden, the same people who are telling us we have to take the mob in the street seriously on de funding the police all cops are bastards that kind of thing. Now says No, No, no, no, You can't listen to these people at all. And I'm not suggesting that either of those groups who commit illegal acts is right. They're not both of them are wrong. But the answer from the political elites and especially on the left is entirely different On that note. Tom Fitton joins me the president of judicial watching Tom. It's good to have you back on the program. What conclusions did you draw after what happened yesterday in the capital? It was extremely upsetting. I live in the district and, um You know the capital was a special place and to see Lawlessness on danger and violence interfere with the proceedings of Congress. Is just awful, and there's no excuse for it. With violent there were people purporting to be Trump's supporters there. Doing it. That's completely inappropriate on day should be prosecuted if they committed crimes, But he wanted committed crimes should be prosecuted. Of course, I've been calling and I know you have been Constitution of riders. For ages now. Yeah, I was at the cabin are hearing that sort of violence and intimidation and lawlessness around the cabin or hearing The White House has been under siege. Repeatedly. And, you know, they laughed and laughed about the president going into the bunker as opposed to saying what is going on here? I mean, guests of the president. Concerned about their safety. The night of his presidential acceptance acceptance speeches for the RNC at the White House there. I mean, anyone who goes to the White House has to be looking over their shoulder the last few months. Because of the violence around that compound. And so now it is expanded to the other side of the political spectrum. With these conservatives riding up there. Of course, it's not conservative the right or to engage in lawless behavior and attacked police and put lives in danger. But the spreading of political violence Among all ideologies in the country is just terrible and dangerous. And you know our city here in Washington, D C. It's incompetently protected. D C. Mayor can't do it? Obviously, the federal agencies have been able to do on unable to do it. I'm glad there's now security there around the capital now. What a Donald Late What is it a day late. A dollar short. And they came after everyone went home. Not only that time, But don't you expect that within a few weeks that extra security will fade in the result? So you think that extra security is going to fade away in the next few weeks? And then they'll be I mean, remember, we're almost 20 years after 9 11 and we were promised there was a threat. There was a threat to fly an airplane right into the into the into the Capitol building, Perhaps And into to kill a great many people, And they said, we have to protect the capital better. And as you say, 20 years later doesn't seem like much has been learned when a mob of people is able to invade the building from all sides on hundreds of people get inside the building. I am concerned that our nation's capital was not secure against politically destabilizing violence. I'm concerned the White House isn't secure enough. And it's obvious the capital isn't secure enough. So you know, this has got to be a bipartisan approach here. I mean, you know, I know the president's leaving. We have a new president coming in. I am concerned about the safety of this of the capital. I don't want to overstate very good way We've seen it time and time again in the city, where political violence has been able to get out of control because of ineffective. Policing and law enforcement. And the president, you know was you know, he talked about invoking the Insurrection act and everyone went crazy. He should have invoked the insurrection act. More knows if it had been invoked. We would have had better security in the capital yesterday. And yet, as you point out, remember the Cavanaugh hearings where there were people who went into the capital and literally went toe to toe with members of Congress in a threatening manner, demanding that they vote differently on the confirmation of justice Cavanaugh and you didn't hear the major media or major politicians say, Well, those people ought to be prosecuted thrown in jail, even though their actions were arguably Very similar to what happened yesterday. No. They were assaulting people and lawlessly occupying the building, too. And I was out. I was there. I saw it. I mean, they were interfering with the hearing there were screaming. They were being dragged out by the police risking people participating in the hearings. The safety of people participating the hearings, risking their own safety and the safety of the police. And you know, I complained about it. I remember talking. Senators about it. Say what's going on? We're going to do to make sure this doesn't happen again. And they don't really you know, they just People understand the politicians and the tail kind of just float its engine to these to these, uh, these basic issues of public safety until you know Maybe now something will be done. And of course, you know the focus is going to be on suppressing conservatives. Attacking anyone who raises questions about the election and the Great Depression continues. But you know, I don't like violence of any type. And, uh, politicians on the other side of winter knotted violence for their side. And, um, I just don't think any side should be winking and nodding of violence, That's for sure..
WCBM 680 AM
"cavanaugh" Discussed on WCBM 680 AM
"Henry, and for anybody who I know a lot of you agree with me, by the way, and a lot of you feel like I'm but there there's there's a contingent out there of people who are gonna be listening right now, and their approach will be. Oh block has gone soft. Or oh, I thought you supported this and and I look, I'll take all that heat and that's fine. And you know you're all of you are more than an entitled to your opinions, but I'm going to I'm speaking to those people now who disagree with me on this, but at least open to hearing my My reasoning on it, or at least open to hearing. Why it is that I'm taking the position that I do. What was it going to accomplish? So so I could take a step back. What does BLM and want to Antifa think they accomplished by doing what they do? So we'll put a hold on even answering the question. What does be eliminated? But what do they think they get out of burning down stores? Looting, rioting? And, yes, I know that over the Cavanaugh hearing that, you know, flooded into the Hart Senate building protesters. You know what went in there and in huge numbers, and this this happens, they took over the Capitol building and In Wisconsin years ago. Left wing protesters I know about all that. Why did they do that? They do it to intimidate people. They do it so that Everyday Americans are scared to oppose them. It is about fear. That is why they loot and burn down and destroy, and it's about exercising their own feelings of rage, and it's about self. It's self gratification and intimidation. That's why they do it. He's going to say it. That's not who we are. That's not who we are. And everyone can get you get mad at me and everything else. I would ask you this. What any of you ever think if I was with you at a march? I would say or that I would even in my all my own. Go run up in and smash a window and Bunch of police officer in the face because I'm upset about politics. That's what was happening yesterday. Okay, so we know why BLM We know why these these groups do what they do. And why it's wrong. What was the purpose? Yesterday of go and I It wasn't an insurrection. It wasn't a terrorist attack. I understand all of that. Of course, I will talk with the media double standards. What was it going to accomplish? The sad part of it is you know what I did? You know, because you know it didn't say it's not going to change the election's not gonna change anything except It emboldens. Our worst, most dishonorable. Opposition. It emboldens the left. And we're going to be paying a price for this now on the battlefield of ideas for some time. You know, I'm telling you the truth. And you know that there is a lot of Double standard out.
News Talk 1130 WISN
"cavanaugh" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN
"Cavanaugh Bell says he's been bullied in school. But rather than let the mean kids get him down. He wants to help others instead on his go fund me page, he writes. After I was bullied, I felt a darkness inside of me. I knew I didn't want other kids to feel the same way. So I asked my mom if she could help me spread love and positivity. The more I give back to my community, the more I want to keep doing it. He started with his own savings and began putting together and giving out care packages filled with food and toiletries for elderly neighbors. It was so popular that he and his mom started a food pantry in a space donated by a local warehouse. Not only does he help in humanitarian work, but Cavanaugh has also launched a nonprofit to combat bullying and spread positivity through acts of kindness. Thank you for inspiring so many and helping others. Cavanaugh you made today's Dean's list. Janice Dean Fox News. Now conservative thought not just talk. Welcome to the Dan O'Donnell show. Fired just one message today. Always have hope. Always believe that America is about its people. America is never about its government or who controls it. America is always about you in the only way That the forces within this country who want to destroy what it is that America stands for, and the founding principles that built it. Is if you give up. Is, if you believe that the fight is no longer worth.
Mark and Melynda
Amy Coney Barret Tilts The Balance in Divisive Ruling
"A lot for being with us on this day after Thanksgiving. It was right before Thanksgiving late Wednesday. When the U. S Supreme Court The majority said, even in a pandemic You can't put away the Constitution. Now. In New York governor Cuomo says that he issued these restrictions on places of worship. Based on science. And safety. And so this is a fascinating ruling. In many regards number one. It's a big plus for religious freedom. Number two. It was just this past summer. That the Supreme Court ruled basically the opposite. In a case and there's some other cases that are being considered. I believe some cases California, New Jersey, Louisiana, So this is all about the Supreme Court blocking New York's governor from enforcing 10 and 25 person occupancy limits On religious institutions. Courts, the restrictions would violate religious freedom. And are not neutral because they single out houses of worship or especially harsh treatment. Or said there's no evidence that the organizations that brought the lawsuit have contributed to the spread of cove in 19. And this was one of those 54 decisions. With Chief Justice John Roberts. Going along with Justices Stephen Bryer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. And in their descent. Chief justice. Roberts said he saw no need to take this action because New York had revised the designations of the affected areas. Governor Cuomo essentially Said the same thing. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court did rule on it and also in the sending opinion. Justice Sonia Sotomayor said this unlike religious services, Bike repair shops and liquor stores generally don't feature customers gathering inside to sing and speak together for an hour or more. She went on to say justices of this court play a deadly game in second guessing the expert judgment of health officials. About the environments in which a contagious virus now infecting a million Americans each week. Spreads most easily. Those are the words and the dissenting opinion from Justice. Sonia Sotomayor, your Down the majority, and this may be the new power five and this is one of the key developments out of this ruling. A new power five on the Supreme Court. Barrett Gorsuch. Thomas Alito. And Cavanaugh. Three of whom, of course, were Appointed By President Donald Trump in the Majority opinion. Justice, Gorsuch said this, he noted that Governor Cuomo had designated among others, the hardware stores acupuncturists. Liquor stores and bicycle repair shops as essential businesses. That were not subject to the most strict limits. Like these places of worship work. Gorsuch said. We may not shelter in place when the Constitution is under attack. Things never go well. When we do So it Zbig deal for the Supreme Court. It's a big deal for I mean, let's face it all those evangelicals that voted for President Trump. They've got to be doing a victory lap today, right? Maybe you are a swell 51283605 90. If you'd like to be a part of the program here, you give us a call or send us a text on K. O. B. J. It is because Amy Barrett just got on the court. Right, So it's really The first significant indication Of a rightward tilt to the court. And I mentioned this and may and July Supreme Court rejected challenges. Virus related restrictions on churches in California and Nevada. At that time, the Chief Justice John Roberts, Joined the courts Democratic appointees, which of course, then included Ruth Bader Ginsburg. And those rulings they stress that state and local governments required flexibility to deal with a dangerous and evolving pandemic. So The New York Times, Right said. This is just One example of how profoundly President Trump Has transformed the Supreme Court. This New York Times P, says Justice Bharat Help the chief justice of body blow. Casting the decisive vote in a 5 to 4 ruling. On religious services in New York. And New York Times says this is most certainly a taste. Of things to come. About this 51283605 90 here on Caleb E. J. It is an interesting question, right? In the summer time. Even the Supreme Court said, Look You may not like it when these local officials are trying to close the church. But You're dealing with health and safety issue. And there are rights. Given to local officials in the event. Of health and safety issues. Well, not in this case, the governor there in New York, Andrew Cuomo. He criticized the Supreme Court. Or overturning their restrictions. He said It was Morrell Astrit Ivo of the Supreme Court than anything else. He called the ruling irrelevant. Said it would have any practical impact because restrictions Are not in place and had been dialed back well. You know, it's interesting that even in the Opinion. That was written by Sonia Sotomayor, right? When she was talking about The court plays a deadly game and second guessing the expert judgment of health official. Let's stop right there.
Here & Now
Supreme Court Rules New York Cannot Limit Attendance At Houses Of Worship Due To COVID-19
"Some religious groups in new york are celebrating last night's rare late night. Supreme court decision blocking an executive order from new york governor andrew cuomo that restricted attendance at religious services in their neighborhoods because the pandemic ultra orthodox jewish organizations in brooklyn and queens and the roman catholic diocese of brooklyn claim. That cuomo single them out. The state pointed to the recent spike in covid nineteen cases. And then there was that alarming ultra orthodox wedding last week. The two hundreds not wearing masks. The court's decision was five. Four with its newest justice emmy coney barrett considered the fifth vote. Emily brazilan staff writer at new york times magazine and fellow at the yale law. School is here emily. Thank you for taking a break from your thanksgiving thanks. You are welcome. Glad to be here. And we should say the to litigants the ultra orthodox jewish groups and the catholic diocese were already not subject to these restrictions. Because they've been lifted there's a color system for restrictions in new york and Cova cases had obey abated in their area. But what was the argument from the court in blocking even targeted restrictions. Well the corpus arguing that new york hadn't shown that less strict measures would be enough to protect public health. Which is a pretty cursory kind of way of thinking about this. You can see the concur. Ince's by justice gorsuch as justice cavanaugh. That some of the conservative judges didn't like the idea that essential businesses which were permitted to open a new york included stores but did not include houses of worship. And i think the odd thing about the majority's analysis here is what it's comparing so the majority behaves as if people going to stores are the same as people congregating in a house of worship even though it's very unusual in store for lots of people to be sitting together or certainly singing or chanting together for a long time. That's all in a church or synagogue or a mosque and we know that that is a riskier activity. So there was no discussion of the science or scientific public health considerations in the majority's opinion. And what about chief. Justice john robertson. The three liberal justices dissenting. What did they say. Well chief justice. John roberts says there's no reason for us to decide this right now for the reason that you gave earlier new york had a lift these restrictions for now because the krona virus spread is not as bad in the city so these restrictions said that in the red zone the highest risk new york. You could have ten people in a house of worship in the orange zone. You could have twenty-five people but the catholic archdiocese in the docks synagogues that have sued. They no longer are subject to those restrictions and so she's jeff roberts was making a kind of traditional conservative judicial modesty Moved here in which he said. Look if they're subject to these restrictions again maybe they will be proved to be unduly harsh but at the moment. They're not so we don't need to step in here. And this is a classic example of a judge saying you know what. Let's leave this in the hands of public. Health officials not have judges step in to make these decisions. Unless it's absolutely necessary will be clear. What does it mean. I mean be clear. Only because i'm not able to figure this out. Temporary decision made on an emergency basis by the way when ruth bader ginsburg was on the court roberts sided with the liberals and the decision was in favor of restrictions that was when california had restrictions in place. So obviously there's been a tilt here but what does this mean for other states for new york when it comes to restrictions on houses of worship in the pandemic y- i'm kind of scratching my head about that too. I mean it looks like what the court is saying. Is that if you have businesses open you have to treat churches and other houses of worship just like those businesses but without paying attention to the greater risk that the church that you know religious service can entail and that's very strange to me because it seems so at odds with the science and what we know about the spread of coronavirus. And so you're right. This is a decision. That's a temporary restraining. Order against new york. The merits the kind of larger case is still to be thrashed out the lower courts and so one hopes going forward that there will be more attention to these apples to apples. Comparisons and figuring out what the state really needs to do to protect public health and mall many have seen the video from the acidic wedding in brooklyn this month. Hundreds packing a synagogue. No-one wearing masks mayor. Bill de blasio said or organizers will find fifteen thousand for violating restrictions. And so we're keeping an eye on that to see what happens. There might be any kind of consideration of
TIME's Top Stories
The Supreme Court Allows More Time For Pennsylvania's Mail In Voting
"The Supreme Court allows extra time for Pennsylvania's mail in ballots by Marc Sherman and Mark Levy. Washington. The Supreme Court will allow Pennsylvania to count mailed in ballots received up to three days after the November third election rejecting a Republican plea in the presidential battleground state. The justices divided four four on Monday an outcome that upholds a state Supreme Court ruling that required county election officials to receive and count mailed in ballots that arrive up until November sixth. Even if they don't have a clear postmark as long as there is not proof it was mailed after the polls closed Republicans including President Donald Trump's campaign have opposed such an extension arguing that it violates federal law that sets Election Day as the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November and that such a decision constitutionally belongs to lawmakers not the courts. The State Republican Party Chairman Lawrence Tavis said the party disagrees with the decision and noting the four four decision. It only underscores the importance of having a full supreme court as soon as possible to be clear. The Supreme Court decided not to grant stay which does not mean the actions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court would withstand a legal challenge to their judicial overreach. Should the court hear the case tape said? Nancy Patty. Mills Chairwoman of the Pennsylvania Democratic Party accused Republicans of trying to sow confusion and disenfranchise eligible voters. This is a significant victory for Pennsylvania voters. Mills said in a statement, the Democratic majority on the state's High Court had cited warnings that postal service delays could invalidate numbers of ballots and surging demand for mail-in ballots during the coronavirus pandemic to invoke the power used previously by the state's courts to extend election deadlines during a disaster. Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the three liberal justices to reject Pennsylvania Republicans call for the court to block the State Court ruling. Justices Samuel Alito Neal Gorsuch Brett. Cavanaugh and Clarence Thomas would have required the state to stop accepting absentee ballots when the polls close on November third. There were no opinions accompanying the order. So it is impossible to say what motivated either group of justices the conservative justices have been reluctant to allow court quarter changes to voting rules close to an election. The court also is weighing a similar issue from Wisconsin but in that case, the ruling being challenged comes from a federal appeals court and the Democrats who are asking the justices to step in. Most states make election day the deadline, but eighteen states half of which backed trump the twenty sixteen election have a post election day deadline with nearly a million votes already cast in Pennsylvania, we support the court's decision not to meddle in our already working system Pennsylvania's Attorney General Democrat Josh Shapiro said in a statement. On, a separate track Republicans in the State House have pressed Governor Tom Wolfe a Democrat to agree to eleventh-hour legislation to eliminate or limit the three days under the court's order. The case is one of many partisan battles being fought in the state legislature and the courts primarily over a male in voting. In Pennsylvania amid concerns that a presidential election result will hang in limbo for days on a drawn out vote count in the battleground state. And Pennsylvania the State Democratic Party and a liberal group the Pennsylvania Alliance for retired Americans had salt an extension of the election day deadline to count mailed ballots. About two point eight, million mail in ballots requested and approximately nine hundred thousand returned democratic registered voters are requesting mail ballots at a nearly three to one ratio over Republicans, and it's September seventeenth ruling the divided state Supreme Court said ballots must be postmarked by the time polls close and be received by county election boards at five pm on November six, three days after the November third election it also said that ballots lacking clear postmark could be counted unless there was evidence that they were mailed after the polls closed.
Hysteria
"Judging Amy"
"Amy Coney Barrett is is talking to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. She's not saying much One thing that's clear from her hearing is that Amy Perez, shifty Amy Kuney Barrett is smart amy. Barrett is smarter than Brett, Kavanagh like of the. Smarter. Than Bread Kavanagh her confirmation hearing significantly less irritating on its face is it's got less screaming in it but do you think that her being? More, pleasant. Than other. Nominee his I'm specifically talking about Brad. Kavanagh, has lulled into a false sense of complacency. No, I don't think. So I really don't I think that we all probably learn a little bit more because we listen because we're not being shouted out about shouted out about making beer and squeeze in some calendars. You know I, think that we in some ways. I can't tell you a ton. From my memory of like policy questions that Brett Cavanaugh answered right like we were really put off by his temperament and everything sort of fell from there. But with her I think that senators have asked very good questions of her I think she hasn't answered most of them I, that that tells us a lot you know. I. Think especially because she is you know for someone who says that? It's my job to not forecast or say how I would vote if I were on the Supreme Court but you know she tells us that she has told us a lot. She's a very Christian she's pro-life and she brings her kids everywhere and I say this because she's a woman but I don't understand why people bring their small children to confirmation hearings it no sense. Have you seen? Pictures from Antonin Scalia is confirmation hearing He brought his entire big family. There's something to me read like sort of hat tip to her mentor Antonin Scalia who she clerked for Oh interests during okay I. did not know that during his hearing. He had like I. Think he has nine kids or something like that, and they all were sitting there in the chambers and he was. Confirmed during a time where things were a lot less contentious I mean bork already happened but he was things were a lot less contentious when he was confirmed and so there was a lot of like it. It's super weird to revisit that now because there was a lot of like people on the committee complimenting his big family and it was it was very, very strange but I think one thing that you know her family life is pretty irrelevant to. Her capacity as as a judge and her being a nice lady doesn't really have anything to do with her capacity as a judge what I was disturbed by that like. These hearings always to me seem just like an exercise and gas lighting. We know what she thinks about Roe v Wade we know what she thinks about it it is. We know and so she spends. Days pretending that we don't know and that her views are somehow something that she's going to rule on without input from her like she signed onto a letter that was written on behalf of a group that believes in vitro fertilization is manslaughter. Anyone asked her about that I didn't not yet. Did they somebody did on Tuesday they asked her if she felt like that and she said that she just signed the letter her way out of church or something I. Did hear that part that's fucking nuts i. just I hate how were being gasoline here I I it here's my question for you. Do you think because you know there are a lot of people who think that Democrats should have boycotted the hearing to show what a sham it was. I don't know how I feel about that. What do you think? I don't know I feel like the the right thing to do is. I think the platonic ideal of a member of the Senate Judiciary for this has been amy, Klobuchar Amy Klobuchar who the good aiming the good amy as you know as as she was running for president, she wasn't somebody that I whose candidacy I was enthusiastic about She's somebody who falls to the right of me on many issues. But as a member of this committee, she's done a really good job of asking pointed questions that seemed to have simple answers but that Amy Coney Barrett the bad, amy. Has Been Dodging.
the NewsWorthy
Washington, DC - A Maryland 7-year-old was bullied. He responded by opening a food pantry.
"That even young kids can make a big difference a seven-year-old from Maryland managed to organize a massive fundraiser to help people in need during the pandemic. His name is Cavanaugh Bell Back in March. He began using his own birthday and Christmas money to put together care packages for seniors pretty soon, other people started chipping in. So cavenaugh has since opened up a full. Food Pantry that's been able to help five thousand people in Maryland he also pulled together fifty thousand dollars, worth of food hygiene products and cleaning supplies for the Pine Ridge Indian reservation in South Dakota and his goodwill is far from over Cavanaugh is still delivering care packages to people in his own community and he started a nonprofit organization called cool and dope that's meant to fight bullying and spread positively.
Bloomberg Markets
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Thousands expected to pay respects as judge lies in repose in Washington DC
"To pay their respects to the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg over the next two days as she lies in honor atop the Supreme Court Steps. Chief Justice John Roberts let a private ceremony with family and more than 100 of Ginsberg's former law clerks this morning before 183 majority concurring and descending opinions will steer the court for decades. They are written with the unaffected grace of precision. Ginsberg's absence on the high court could shift its ideological center from Chief Justice Roberts to President Trump's Last nominee, Brett Kavanaugh. More from Bloomberg's Kathleen Hunter could be particularly important when it comes to issues like abortion. That could go before the court and Cavanaugh in particular his propensity to sort of narrowly craft agreement that we've seen our opinions that we've seen so far from him. That could be something that you know becomes very, very decisive. Sources tell Bloomberg Senate Republicans there formulating plans to hold the hearings for President Trump's nominee around October 12th and that could set up a full vote in the Senate. A week of October. 26th President Trump plans to announce his choice to succeed Ginsberg on Saturday. The White House says he will pay his respects to her tomorrow. The government
The Economist: The Intelligence
Judge dreadthe fight for Ruth Bader Ginsburgs seat
"On Friday US Supreme Court. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died of cancer at the age of eighty seven. A candlelit vigil was held the following day outside the Supreme Court. Justice. GINSBURG was only the second woman appointed to the Supreme Court after being nominated by Bill Clinton in one thousand, nine hundred. I. In. Solemnly swear he was a champion of women's rights, and later in life she achieved restore status especially among young women. Now her death has set the stage for a divisive battle to replace her on the court. She was born in Brooklyn to an immigrant Father Dad was from Odessa in in Russia and to a first generation mother she was Jewish John. Fascination is the economist Washington correspondent and she was a trailblazer throughout her life. She was one of only nine women among five hundred men at Harvard law school, and when she arrived. Erwin griswold, who was then the Dean asked women in the class to stand up and justify taking a spot that could have gone to a man. She said the reason she took the spot is it was important that she understood her husband's work that would've made her husband Marty last Mardi was tax attorney well known in his own right he predeceased her but they had a famously loving and productive and equal partnership. She had a relentless work ethic in. Twenty five years in the Supreme Court she never missed today she's arrived four bouts of cancer before this fifth one killed her it was only after she got sick that she called by phone to oral arguments. I. Think People often have this idea that Supreme Court justices are sort of Stentorian wizards ready to shout down lawyer who they disagree with justice. GINSBURG was not like that she spoke very slowly very deliberately, which mirrors I think how she wrote and how she argued and how she thought she was meticulous. She was precise she she was not a showy justice. She came onto the court actually considered a moderate. There are a lot of people on the left who were upset when she was appointed because she was considered sort of two centrist. But as the court steadily moved rightward during her tenure, she has found herself the de facto leader of the courts liberal wing. Junk she spent a long time on the court. What did she achieve? Well, she was on the Supreme Court for Twenty seven years, and before that was on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, which is widely considered the second most important court in America for for thirteen. So she was a judge for forty years I was age sixty when I was nominated in some people thought I was. Too Old for the job. Now I'm into my twenty-seventh starting my twenty-seventh year on the courts on one of the longest tenured. Justices. So if you worried about my age. It was unnecessary. Before that, she argued six cases before the Supreme Court and she was involved with thirty more as the first director of the US women's rights project. The first of those report court cases was in Reid versus Reid for which she wrote a brief arguing against the law in Ohio that preferred men to women in naming executive estates. She won that case in her first oral argument before the Supreme Court. She argued against the military policy that denied many husbands, officers, the same housing and medical benefits that automatically provided officers. Wise. The thinking was that women are somehow inherently more dependent on their husbands and husbands on their wise. Now, in that case, remember she effectively represented the husband she represented family but she represented the shoes argue in favor of the husband's benefits and she austin said that she was not arguing for women's rights she was arguing for the constitutional equality of men and women. Her death is come at a critical time in American politics. It's just six weeks away from the election. So what impact does that have? Well I think it's a little too early to say that definitively. It looks as though both sides are gearing up for battle, but they seem to be quietly circling each other in two thousand sixteen. The Supreme Court is central to Donald Trump's success I think because. There is an open seat in two thousand, Sixteen Justice Antonin Scalia died, and Mitch McConnell who is then the Senate minority leader rather than hold a hearing on Barack Obama's chosen replacement for Justice Scalia whose Merrick Garland he came up with a rationale disguises the principle which was that the causing election was coming up the speech beheld open. So the voters could decide now that had never been done before it was clearly a power play. It was a live sort of issue for Republicans impelled I think a lot of them who otherwise would have held donald trump at arm's length to decide that just had to vote for him this time I. Think Donald Trump is hoping for a similar effect this time, but he also wants to get the filled as quickly as possible. For Democrats donations had started pouring in, they have been pouring all weekend. Democrats seem riled up by this. I think in their view if Donald Trump managed to get a successor onto the court, this'll be the seconds effectively stolen seat right? The I was Neil Gorsuch. who was given the seat that was held open by Mitch McConnell, and the second would be whoever donald trump nominees to replace justice GINSBURG who gets the seat because Mitch McConnell did not follow the principle he set up in two thousand sixteen. John Do you think Senate. Republicans have the numbers to they have the votes to get in trump's nominee through before the election. Well this is the question on everyone's mind. Right so far Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski Republican senators from from Maine Alaska, had said that they will not vote for replacement before November third they have said that the president who wins on November third you choose the replacement now that only gets Democrats to forty nine and they need fifty one because in the case of a tie Mike. Pence cast the tiebreaking vote Lindsey Graham had previously said he would abide by Mitch McConnell's rule from twenty sixteen. He has now gone back on that apparently because he's angry Democrats didn't roll over for Brad Cavanaugh Chuck. Grassley, who's a senator from Iowa has also previously spoken in favor of McConnell's precedent. I, have a very hard time imagining that when push comes to shove, he'll stand by his. Word and so there really is nothing Democrats can do unless they can persuade two other Republicans to come join them, and if they can't persuade those Republicans and tip the balance what happens. Then what are the consequences for the years ahead on American politics? It's clear that what McConnell did in two thousand sixteen was a tremendous violation of norms I think it's not a good principal to. Uphold I think arguing that this is now how Supreme Court seats should be awarded that in an election year, you effectively have to hold the seat open until the end of the election is a bad precedent but I think there's a difference between saying Republicans should be consistent for the sake of consistency and Republicans should follow this principle because that's how court seat should be given out now. From the Democratic Base, there's been a tremendous push to threaten Republicans with repercussions if. Retake. The Senate and the president in that includes making Puerto Rico in Washington DC states, which would effectively at least in the near in medium-term Give Democrats four senators people have also been talking about expanding the court. So the reason they are Nice Ring Court justices is not constitutional legal. It's just a statute. So if they were minded and had a majority had a president who would sign it into law, they put eleven or thirteen justices on the supreme court. The problem with that for Democrats I think is that it sort of shifts the terms. Of the debate that they are now winning I think the way Joe, Biden has pitched. This campaign is on the one hand. You have the sort of chaotic destructive Donald Trump on the other. You have Joe Biden Palm known figure who will get us back to normal. If, he comes out and endorses expanding the court or State of DC in Puerto Rico, which to be clear he has not done. He is actually a opposed expanded from court but if he comes out if Democrats threaten this, then the debate becomes a lot murkier. Then it becomes the radical change that Joe Biden wants to do right take fifty, two states and putting thirteen on Supreme Court against Donald Trump will keep things as are I think that debate does not play out very well for Democrats. John Thank you very much time.
San Diego Business with Sully
Polls Have Shown Voters Prefer Biden to Pick Next Justice
"Have this obligation without delay. I'm ham who so Fox News President Trump directing that tweet to Republicans following the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the president, indicating he plans to nominate someone quickly to fill the vacancy, But he hasn't yet unveiled a pick. This is a president who is guided by the founding of this country and the Constitution and you look at the justices he's put in place. Neil Gorsuch, you look at Justice Cavanaugh thes air great justices. White House Press secretary Kayleigh Mcenany. With the presidential election just weeks away, Democrats are opposed to seating a new justice. I don't want to get involved in this debate. Until at least, uh, justice against burning her family had time to mourn and celebrate and reflect Senator Joe Mansion of West Virginia. Fox News has confirmed Senate Democrats will hold a conference call next hour to talk about howto handle the vacancy. Senator Kamala Harris, who's also the Democratic nominee for vice president said this in a tweet. The stakes of this election couldn't be higher. Millions of Americans are counting on us to win and protect the Supreme Court. The latest Fox News poll takes a look at who Americans believe is best suited to pick the next justice. Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden edging out President Trump by seven points 52 to 45%. Outside the
WBZ Afternoon News
Death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg sets up contentious U.S. fight over replacement
"In the Supreme Court, Second Woman Justice and the lawyer who helped and federal sex discrimination. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died at her home in Washington. She was 87. Now the fight to replace her. The president has been ready to go should he have the chance to make another nomination to the Supreme Court? He had to already Cavanaugh and near Neil Gorsuch. And even just last week he didn't event where he said he's adding 20 names to this list. He has his list ready to go. He has a majority in the Senate. But with seven weeks now, less than that, until election day, the big question will be. Can they get this through once he does make a nomination? ABC is Karen Trevor's Senate Democratic Minority leader, Chuck Schumer, reminding Republicans that they blocked President Obama from confirming a justice, saying nearly 300 days before an election was too Soon and that the next president should make the pick. Justice Ginsburg has died less than two months before this election and the field ABC News President
Tamarindo
A conversation on why you should vote
"Welcome back to another episode of that money though friends we have just a few weeks left before the general election it's happening November third. The day is finally here and we WANNA. Talk about the election this episode because many states are going to be having their deadlines for which which you can register usually happening in October depending on your states look that up and we thought it'd be important to visit with all of you why it's so important to vote. We actually asked them of our listeners what are the three reasons that you're voting and? They said in. His off. Yes. So from the Angelo from the Geek Life, we all knew America had major issues but these four issues have shown us how bad things could really be. He's four years. Yeah. A number to worry about a month away from being still being society e and number three I'm O'Brien in. America. And I grew up in fear and don't want my kids to do. So those reasons we love him. Thank you. and. Then we had the folks from lat. Next point of view podcast. They said that healthcare is the number one issue because less people in the US have access to healthcare, which is a big deal when you're experiencing global pandemic number two, the economy, and then number three `immigration is that these are the three reasons for black next point of view. All right. So we got Joe, Sparkman, who said number one to dump trump Helje number to fight racism and number three fight sexism Mcginn. grazes. And then we had one more and lease said healthcare and immigration for sure. So I mean, there's so many reasons to vote for this election. We have a huge opportunity coming up to course correct the past four years but rather than focusing on us whoever is trump and who by the way we've decided on a shelley and mutually decided actually decided but I agree we're gonNA retire putting trump in the trash can there's just too many trump's there. So we don't have to do that here. There's Lore we're not doing it. WOULDA yeah. He's already there. So if you're. Even, you're no longer allowed to put trump in there because he's there's too many of them in there any who so we're going to focus not on that but instead like what are we voting for? It's not just against trump, but there's plenty of things to vote for. So entertain that why are you gonNa vote this November So. Many reasons and I mean ultimately what I want most is for everyone to live there moth antic fulfilling and healthy lives and I think in order for us to be able to do that, we need to have living wages we need to be able to live where we want without fear. We need to have equal access to education and opportunities, and we need to have access to safe in green communities and environments. Amen, I mean all that can go deeper into a few things and I know Brenda you'll share some with us, but I think I vote because environmental justice and Climate Change I. Think are one of the most urgent issues of our generation and trump has shown us that they do not care about the trump administration says that it did not care about that they recently rolled. Back Environmental Procedural protections under the Environmental Policy Act. So basically, you can build your highways, your pipelines and power plants without consideration of a lot of the harmful effects that they can cause on our communities and environmentally, and also our communities, and you know it's not a surprise that most of the communities that are affected by these types of this construction are Brown and black communities. That's so true. So and then along with that I'm also voting because I care about black lives and I care about criminal justice reform, and again, the trump administration has shown this time and time again that they're willing to put the economy before human lives are willing to protect professor percents. Supremacy and that's Discussed the Americans and we've seen that in how we handled pandemic that he literally cared more about you know the economy than human lives especially. Brown. Black lives we've seen how eases uses platform twitter and other social media insight, right wing violence, and that's been really scary for for me to release it lane actual literal. You know the young man is a shit that shot people and what we've known for a long time is that we really need to re imagine how our criminal justice system works and we know that the trump administration has does not is not putting that as a priority and I know that a lot of people will say. For Sure Joe Biden did help author the crime bill and Nineteen ninety-four. But I believe I believe in the power of change and I believe from what I've seen with from Biden including Kamala that they're willing to course correct and they definitely care more about reimagining and change criminal justice system than than trump does that's one hundred percent true. Those are excellent reasons. One hundred percent concur with that. How about you? Brenda, what are the? What are a few reasons I know there are so many reasons but what if you want to call out for listeners? So many definitely underscore everything that you said, but I think it's good for everyone to remember that the president can do so much including appointing, supreme, court justices, and other federal federal federal judges. So a good reason to vote is the courts you maybe don't like Biden. Harris don't even think about them just think about what's at stake. So the president of the United States gets to appoint judges, and if we remember there's been lots of Supreme Court battles from Dhaka from ACA to reproductive and lgbtq rights in this court the Supreme Court is all over the place that he they're mostly conservative. got to a point to super right wing horrible people including Justice Cavanaugh a rapist, and also eight RPG is eighty seven years old and she's battled cancer multiple times. So it's very likely that whoever wins in November they're to be able to appoint another Supreme Court justice and what's at stake we Really can't afford that.
Skullduggery
Justice Ginsburg reveals she's battling cancer recurrence
"Ruth Bader GINSBURG has recurrence of her cancer and is. Taking chemotherapy so I. JUST WANNA play out a scenario here and get your thinking about it. Let's assume that. There is a vacancy on the Supreme Court between now and next January twenty and mitch, McConnell and Donald Trump. Decide to do the opposite of what they did with Merrick garland refusing what McConnell did with American, refused to have him about. Trump nominates a conservative justice to replace Ruth Bader GINSBURG. He could even do that after he loses the election in November. There's a lame Duck Senate and Mitch McConnell decides to push that through while he still has the votes. What would be the appropriate response from people on your side of the political divide to such a scenario? I. Mean I think you know maybe mass protests on a scale that we have not yet seen Ryan, I mean we've seen I. Think again and again protests, I we? The women's March where the which were the biggest protests ever up until that time I? Think those have now been exceeded by these black lives matter protest and I think that if you. I would like to think that you know in such a situation. You would have people in the streets and mass once again and I think one of the things that we've seen with these most recent black lives matter protests is how protests can work. Rate is how they can I don't I'm not sure I. I am sure I don't think they would stop. Mitch McConnell from I'm trying to think of a non obscene way to describe what Mitch McConnell with due to the future of democracy. Rape and I don't think that they would stop him, but you know you never know i. mean even the protests around Justice Cavanaugh. At least bought people a week right when those investigations were going on and and Jeff Flake voted to. Continue the investigation for one week and so. You know it would certainly deserve a. A mass uprising were they to sort of. Book the problem that we've had. It's a big problem in this country, and that it has been highlighted by the nightmare of the trump administration is minority rule. You know that you had minority president for the second time in. Two decades that you have a Senate controlled by a small minority of the country. That is able to put. People onto a supreme court that will. Again sort of rule against the interests of the majority I mean I think there's for obvious reasons the constitution is like has been written such as to head off a tyranny of the majority. What we have now a tyranny of the minority, and if Donald Trump were able to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg were able to deal the death. Blow to Roe versus Wade. You know sort of a preemptive deathblow to any kind of big sweeping economic legislation that a binded administration would need to pass in order to shore up a quickly failing economy and A. catastrophically failing health care system. Rate I think if the democratic process fails in giving people a way to address that than the way to address, that is through mass non-violent action.
WSJ What's News
Supreme Court Issues Key Rulings on Trump's Finances
"On the final day of its term, the Supreme Court issued two highly anticipated rulings involving president trump's financial records. One decision clears the way for Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance to potentially view the president's taxes. The other was a mixed decision involving congressional efforts to obtain the president's personal financial documents both were sent back to lower courts for further consideration. Joining me now with more details is our legal affairs reporter Brent Kendall. So rent. The court rejected the president's efforts to block New York subpoena seeking his tax records, but issued a mixed ruling in a related case involving subpoenas from House Democrats. Can you tell us more about these rulings? And why in the congressional case? It was a mixed ruling. On the congressional case we'll start there that the court made pretty clear that it was not at all satisfied with either president trump's position. which the court said would really neuter Congress and make it harder for the legislative branch to do investigation while also being equally dissatisfied with Congress's position here and said look. Lawmakers you're under the belief that you can just get almost anything you want under the Sun, and the the you know, the president here is different. This is about his personal papers, and we really do need to give more scrutiny here to make sure that these requests are targeted and limited and these. Don't harass the president or become a really burdensome on him in some ways that case ended up as kind of a draw, and we will have significant further lower proceedings, and it's. It's hard to know at this point at the end of the day whether Congress is going to get. Any some all of these records that it is seeking the one thing we do know. It's extremely unlikely that they're going to get any of them before the election in November The vans case with a lot clearer and a lot. More of a straight forward and fairly sweeping loss for the president who argued that he was absolutely immune from having his financial information, disclosed or turned over to state prosecutors Wyle. He was in office, and the court flatly rejected that claim and basically sided with newer prosecutors and all their basic. That case isn't completely resolved. either. The president still potentially has more arguments. He can make against the subpoenas which he will certainly try to do in the lower courts, but it did remove a big roadblock for prosecutors in Manhattan who are examining whether President, trump or people close to him violated any state record keeping laws. So these separate cases, both came down and seven to two votes, and the president's appointees neal gorsuch and bright cavanaugh were in the majority. What do you make of that breakdown? While I mean it's a pretty remarkable thing and most of the big cases here right at the end of the term, the chief justice avoided five four rulings, and so for example we had some big religious freedom cases that were issued on Wednesday and have been the kinds of cases in the past. We're liberal justices, all descended and they're. The just got to the Liberals to join with the Conservatives, and what is was a pair of fairly conservative rulings in favor of religious institutions, and then flipping things around today we had the chief justice in the four liberal justices, and the chief was also bring along justices, neal gorsuch and Brett Cavanaugh, who are both trump appointees and to the majority in both of these rulings, those two didn't agree on all the same reasoning, but joined the outcomes. We ended up out of the nine justices with only two dissenters justices clarence. Thomas Samuel Alito. Tell us more about what happens next. For these two cases, what questions are now left for the lower courts? especially as we're looking ahead to the November election, even if these issues won't be resolved by then. There are a lot more issues for the lower courts in the congressional cases, basically because the Supreme Court crafted a whole new set of standards, the judges should now look out for these kinds of disputes. I mean the disputes. Themselves are pretty rare, normally congress and the White House work out their differences when Congress wants to have people testify when they want information. But now the court is basically said you lower chords take these new standards. We've articulated that we think will provide some protections to the president as well as some protections to Congress and sort out who's got the better argument here. That's going to take time. The New York case may take a little less time. The president still has some arguments available to him to contest the criminal subpoena here to his accountant's but they're more straightforward at. That courts can deal with more quickly, but even there it's going to take time, and even if he loses and the accountants turnover this information to Manhattan prosecutors. This comes in the context of a secret grand jury proceeding, and it will be many months, if ever, before details of of what prosecutors learn would become public. And the president quickly responded to these rulings on twitter. We are hearing responses. Continue to roll in. Tell me a little bit about your impressions of what he's been saying well, the president has been frustrated with a Supreme Court on several of its rulings, including one day invalidated his cancellation of the Dhaka and program and right after the ruling came out today, and he expressed clear frustration on twitter that this case would continue and express his views that this is sort of a political partisan prosecution that's designed to harass him, and he said that it was not fair to him or his administration. While the president was frustrated with the rulings today. Sivan's in New York. The prosecutor who is leading this investigation was thrilled and said this was a day really where the Supreme Court affirmed the rule of law that is applied to the president, just like everybody else. And he said now his team would get back to doing the business that had been doing of investigating this case and proceeding as it had planned to proceed, while also knowing they're still future battles ahead against president trump and his lawyers as this probe continues. France it's been a busy few weeks as supreme. Court now heads into its recess. Any final thoughts that you're leaving with well. It was a really big momentous term, even though the court ended up hearing less cases than it had planned because of corona virus, but we had these major rulings today on presidential power. We've had blockbuster rulings on religious freedom on gay rights in the workplace on the DACA immigration case. A lot at the court has tackled, and so it will take at at least a little bit of a breather now while we all sort out what's on the horizon. Wall Street Journal. Legal, affairs reporter Brent Kendall Brent thank you so much for joining me sure. Thank thank you.