35 Burst results for "Carbon Capture"

White House Hosts Virtual Climate Summit on Earth Day

WBZ Morning News

00:34 sec | 2 weeks ago

White House Hosts Virtual Climate Summit on Earth Day

"Change with dozens of world leaders. White House invited 40 world leaders to participate in the virtual climate summit, including China's President XI and Russian President Putin. Remarks will come from President Biden Vice President Harris Secretary of State Tony Blinken, special envoy for Climate John Kerry and national Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy. On the agenda, discussions about how the highest polluting countries can reduce carbon dioxide emissions, financial reform, innovation and making technology like carbon captured cheaper and the economic benefits of investing in climate solutions. Karen Travers, ABC NEWS Washington, Tensions between

President Biden Vice President Gina Mccarthy White House Putin John Kerry China Karen Travers ABC Washington
Coal Miners Union Backs Clean Energy Push

Marketplace Minute

00:19 sec | 2 weeks ago

Coal Miners Union Backs Clean Energy Push

"President biden's infrastructure proposal would invest in renewable energy. Now the head of the united mine workers of america is backing the idea. If there are jobs made available for coal miners who are out of work in a new proposal. Union also wants among other things financial incentives to develop carbon capture technology.

President Biden United Mine Workers Of America
Schlumberger Delfi: Melissa Suman on Oil and Gas Startups

Oil and Gas Startups Podcast

01:56 min | 3 weeks ago

Schlumberger Delfi: Melissa Suman on Oil and Gas Startups

"Are sitting down with melissa suman. Most i didn't even ask you what your role is over at delfi or do you say it's adelphia you say it's at its love slumber j. but adelphia's the product is one of our solutions. Really one of the. Oh so you represent multiple solutions. Do i manage a sort of five business lines for us. Land that covers everything from what we call digital subsurface digital operation solutions. Everything from exploration all the way through drilling and production digital solutions All the way to integrated solutions around carbon capture and storage integrated. well construction. You stay busy was as big of a deal. Okay let me sit up straight talk all right so how how you start there. Eighteen years okay. I was twenty one. When i joined there was a baby. You don't look old enough to be there for eighteen years monday. I was like certainly we're the same age. I mean we could be there for eighteen years. Yeah events you sitting. Jacob put that condition over this first before we get into your story tells duffy. Is that where we have some context knocking about today about your story at summer. Jay so fair so in twenty seventeen we launched delfi so starkly. Slumber j. has been in the business of sort of emp software and It's been an on prem solution very traditional business and and we decided to to transform ourselves before people pushed us to transform so in two thousand seventeen. We launched delfi. It's a open environment where you can pull in applications and data and workflows and and sort of break down. The silos of what was traditionally the different domains the petra physics and the geoscientists and the reservoir engineer and work in one sort of collaborative

Delfi Adelphia Melissa Suman Duffy Jacob JAY
Elon Musk is donating a $100 million prize for carbon capture technology

Lew Later

01:03 min | 3 months ago

Elon Musk is donating a $100 million prize for carbon capture technology

"Along. Musk says he will donate one. Hundred million dollars to whoever invents the best carbon capture technology. I think he put this on twitter in the form of a tweet. Actually yes. here's the tweet donating one hundred m towards a prize for best carbon capture technology. Now what this is will is obviously for the environment. The he's looking for any technology that can capture carbon dioxide trapping it directly from the air or just before it gets emitted from factories or power plants. I suppose there could be a variety of proposals for how to do this but in capturing it you can obviously avoid having it enter the atmosphere and you know damaging the ozone and all the rest of it in fact what they do will after they capture it. They pump it back down to earth where it can stay like get fucking. Yeah he's can stay hidden in there or they can use it for something

Musk Twitter
Elon Musk is donating a $100 million prize for carbon capture technology

Colorado's Morning News with April Zesbaugh and Marty Lenz

00:16 sec | 3 months ago

Elon Musk is donating a $100 million prize for carbon capture technology

"$100 million towards a prize for the best carbon capture technology. The test in space like CEO, making that announcement in a tweet TechCrunch reported month. Musk's donation will be connected to the X Prize Foundation, the nonprofit those competitions that encouraged technological innovation and development and Dolly Parton,

Techcrunch Musk X Prize Foundation Dolly Parton
"carbon capture" Discussed on Software Engineering Daily

Software Engineering Daily

01:39 min | 3 months ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on Software Engineering Daily

"Is a company that can help you scale your team with new engineers. I've worked with ex team. And they can be a long term solution they can help you scale and retain your team for the long haul and provide solutions that. Give your company long-lasting forward moving momentum. They have solutions. Like team is a service pair programming mentorship for your existing team. Onside collaboration ex team is a group of thousands of proven developers in over fifty countries. That are ready to join your team and provided an immediate positive impact. You can go to ex team dot com slash s daily. That's ex- dash team slash. Se daily x dash team dot com slash s daily and get developers to help on your team. Ex- team is able to support a full range of team. In project needs devops mobile engineers backend architecture front end development commerce. They work within the full range of technologies. Aws go lang. Java script sharp affi- java the list goes on if your engineering team is suffering from scaling ex team can help you support your team. Ex- team offers flexible options for their partners to help them grow their team. Efficiently and their models built to allow for seamless integration with companies and of all sizes. They've worked with riot games. Sony coin based fox. Google all kinds of companies your development could use of firepower via some of the top engineering talent in the world. Good x dash team dot com slash s daily. That's ex- dash team dot com slash sl daily and check it out..

"carbon capture" Discussed on Software Engineering Daily

Software Engineering Daily

07:02 min | 3 months ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on Software Engineering Daily

"Forest remove carbon from dan lewis fear as trees grow. And you know thanks to framework if you have a piece of land in which you can plant trees or conserve an existing forests that otherwise would be cut down. You can get paid current credits to continue doing that work. So that is a framework and these frankly has existed for many years but unfortunately until today there wasn't a lot of technology a the software powering the certification and exchange of the concrete industrial. We decided to focus on jemma. What kind of technology could be useful in the workflow of managing carbon offsets. Yes so the first part is violating monitoring. How much carbon is being sequester by forest into that we use remote sensing data in machine learning algorithms that basically aim to predict. How much carbon is there on a forest in particular for example one of the models that we built train on a combination of satellite data coming from nasa lanza data with lied are they coming from companies that collect that data from airplanes. And it's basically at three dimensional cloud of points that gives you the shape of the structure of the forest and then we have ground truth. That is coming from four services from around the world that send people to the field to count trees and sure trace with dates and know exactly how much carbon each of the streets have you know so then we run deep learning algorithms convolution new neural networks to train on the day. Dan then be able to predict how much car when they're in a forest. Just using satellite that is one of the parts of the stock that were building being able to replicate the tests that are needed to validate. How much carbon is being sequestered by a forest. Then the second part is really on the exchange of this credits today. Daddy's gone you know by brokers in very manual way in we build on online marketplace that basically allows the different parties to connect online and then we have a an exchange in an accounting system. You know on the cloud that allows for the transactions to happen online and therefore disgraced retired and its api. We connect to the public registries to make sure that everything gets said. They'll on this public carbon accounting. And then you know a lot of other cool things that can be don with technology to make the system more efficient than more transparent. Are you running a business or a nonprofit. This is a business we when we started the company with thought about whether this should be a nonprofit or business but you know we had a clear business model which is that if we could help increase the flow of capital going from corporations and governments towers projects that are doing reforestation and conservation and we could take a commission out of the transaction that facilitate then we have a business model. That is not that different from airbnb or uber or zillow and free could have a. Would this model. That would allow us to grow faster and invest more in technology and in growing our team. Dad may sense you know so busy smaller salon with a mission daddy's not about prophets. But it's about protecting the planet and also by being a for profit company. We could tap into venture capital. Nba will just grow faster and you know the climate crisis so urgent that dead that we need to go fast. And that's what we decided to go a for profit business before we get into engineering more. Can you speak a little bit more about where the profit margins li- like where do you actually make money long process. Yeah so on. The only marketplace where companies meet project developers and trend socked on the exchange of this current credits. We take a twenty percent commission against similar to other on marketplaces sadler. And all the data validation and monitoring that we do is that something that we have offered for free or as part of the information that is given to buyers when they purchased on credits in the future one we use that they had to held originate and certify projects than there's business model there too but for now we're just focusing on the transactions so walk me through a traditional or typical transaction that a corporation might make on trauma yet. Let me use an example. That is exciting because shelby. Fight for example. Show before it's a company that as you may know power a lot of ecommerce sites right and showpiece fight gain to us and they not only wanted to compensate their own emissions and purchase current credits to compensate on emissions but also wanted to offer their merchants the ability to offer carbon neutral shipping. So would then of course it. First step for them was to navigate through the marketplace into on study on the projects that we represent the marketplace in to ask a lot of questions about them but then after they made initial purchase. They ask us count. We do an integration with you guys and so we started building. Api so that microtransactions could happen and they could make this microtransactions on behalf of the merchants so that was a case of not only damn coming and selecting projects in purchasing products in the marketplace but also decorating a little bit deeper. So let's say. I select carbon neutral shipping on shopper fi. What is actually happening on the back end when i'm checking out. Yeah so in one hand there's going to be a calculation of what east carbon footprint of the shipping and to do that basically. There's a formula that calculates has the package needs to travel and then there's Coefficient that converts that mileage into current footprint so once the estimation of how much carbon is to be compensated than a microtransactions for the purchase of current. Credits gets guard. And then you know that basically retires credits from the public registries. Retiring red means that that credit can not be sold again and that ninety and sub going to a project developer in brazil or peru or a us or canada that is effectively considering forest or restoring.

brazil canada peru twenty percent second part today Dan first part ninety one four services First step uber nasa lanza Api one of the parts each of one hand many years streets
"carbon capture" Discussed on Software Engineering Daily

Software Engineering Daily

03:37 min | 3 months ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on Software Engineering Daily

"Welcome to the show thank you. Jeffrey excited to hear your pajama. Pyjama is a company that helps with carbon offsetting. Can you explain. Carbon-offsetting is sure. This is an idea that was invented at the united nations in the kyoto agreement which was a predecessor to the famous paris agreement. And the idea. Is that as we move away from fossil fuels or as a way to incentivize the move away from fossil fuels we need to make looters companies in countries to compensate for the carbon emissions. They're putting in the atmosphere that are causing climate change right so there is a system by which then projects that either reduce emissions or removed governor from the fear can receive carbon credits equivalent to the amount of car on this project. Effectively reducing or removing. And then these companies can purchase those car on create certificates and use them to compensate their emissions and in doing so the benefit. You want side now. They have an economic incentive to do away from posted fields so that they don't have to be spending money on compensating for those emissions and secondly that money goes to fund very important projects such us renewable energy and lowercase forest restoration conservation as you know forest remove carbon from dan lewis fear as trees grow. And you know thanks to framework if you have a piece of land in which you can plant trees or conserve an existing forests that otherwise would be cut down. You can get paid current credits to continue doing that work. So that is a framework and these frankly has existed for many years but unfortunately until today there wasn't a lot of technology a the software powering the certification and exchange of the concrete industrial. We decided to focus. On what kind of technology could be useful in the workflow of managing carbon offsets. Yes so the first part is violating monitoring. How much carbon is being sequester by forest into that we use remote sensing data in machine learning algorithms that basically aim to predict. How much carbon is there on a forest in particular for example one of the models that we built train on a combination of satellite data coming from nasa lanza data with lied are they coming from companies that collect that data from airplanes. And it's basically at three dimensional cloud of points that gives you the shape of the structure of the forest and then we have ground truth. That is coming from four services from around the world that send people to the field to count trees and sure trace with dates and know exactly how much carbon each of the streets have you know so then we run deep learning algorithms convolution new neural networks to train on the day dan the nba to predict how much car when they're in a forest just using satellite. That is one of the parts of the stock that were building being able to replicate the tests that are needed to validate how much carbon is being sequestered by a forest.

brazil canada peru twenty percent today Craig first part second part one four services ninety First step nasa lanza crisis one of the parts uber many years each of the streets Nba airbnb
Machine Learning Carbon Capture with Diego Saez-Gil

Software Engineering Daily

03:37 min | 3 months ago

Machine Learning Carbon Capture with Diego Saez-Gil

"Welcome to the show thank you. Jeffrey excited to hear your pajama. Pyjama is a company that helps with carbon offsetting. Can you explain. Carbon-offsetting is sure. This is an idea that was invented at the united nations in the kyoto agreement which was a predecessor to the famous paris agreement. And the idea. Is that as we move away from fossil fuels or as a way to incentivize the move away from fossil fuels we need to make looters companies in countries to compensate for the carbon emissions. They're putting in the atmosphere that are causing climate change right so there is a system by which then projects that either reduce emissions or removed governor from the fear can receive carbon credits equivalent to the amount of car on this project. Effectively reducing or removing. And then these companies can purchase those car on create certificates and use them to compensate their emissions and in doing so the benefit. You want side now. They have an economic incentive to do away from posted fields so that they don't have to be spending money on compensating for those emissions and secondly that money goes to fund very important projects such us renewable energy and lowercase forest restoration conservation as you know forest remove carbon from dan lewis fear as trees grow. And you know thanks to framework if you have a piece of land in which you can plant trees or conserve an existing forests that otherwise would be cut down. You can get paid current credits to continue doing that work. So that is a framework and these frankly has existed for many years but unfortunately until today there wasn't a lot of technology a the software powering the certification and exchange of the concrete industrial. We decided to focus. On what kind of technology could be useful in the workflow of managing carbon offsets. Yes so the first part is violating monitoring. How much carbon is being sequester by forest into that we use remote sensing data in machine learning algorithms that basically aim to predict. How much carbon is there on a forest in particular for example one of the models that we built train on a combination of satellite data coming from nasa lanza data with lied are they coming from companies that collect that data from airplanes. And it's basically at three dimensional cloud of points that gives you the shape of the structure of the forest and then we have ground truth. That is coming from four services from around the world that send people to the field to count trees and sure trace with dates and know exactly how much carbon each of the streets have you know so then we run deep learning algorithms convolution new neural networks to train on the day dan the nba to predict how much car when they're in a forest just using satellite. That is one of the parts of the stock that were building being able to replicate the tests that are needed to validate how much carbon is being sequestered by a forest.

Dan Lewis Kyoto Jeffrey United Nations Paris United States Nasa NBA
Agriculture Industry Bets on Carbon as a New Cash Crop

WSJ What's News

05:52 min | 4 months ago

Agriculture Industry Bets on Carbon as a New Cash Crop

"The newest cash crop for farmers may be greenhouse gas some farmers who normally make their living raising crops in the soil are now getting paid to use those plans to capture carbon dioxide from the air and put it back in their fields. Big agricultural companies including bayer and cargill are jockeying startups. On these initiatives their goal is to incentivize farmers to adopt climate-friendly practices and developed markets for carbon for more on the story. We have jacob bungee who covers the agriculture industry for the wall street journal. He spoke with our charlie turner jacob. How exactly does this. Carbon capture system work. This is a system. That's based around voluntary offsets or credits. Being purchased by companies and these could be food companies. that could be an energy company. It could be tech company that says they want to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by some amount or achieve net zero emissions in one way that they're now going to be able to do. This is by effectively. Paying farmers who raise crops like corn and soybeans to manage their farms in such a way that the fields the soil captures carbon and stores it in the dirt and the reason for that is because plans grow. They withdraw carbon dioxide from the air. They use this in the process of photosynthesis to produce energy to grow In that process the plants then release carbon into the soil. there's no federal requirement for companies to offset their greenhouse gas emissions by buying credits from farmers. So why are companies interested in this over the last ten twenty years even longer you can see examples of consumer facing companies. Want be more sustainable and any number of reasons for this. I mean some of the have this. As part of their corporate mission as important to the founders in other cases it helps draw consumers to companies and and try to have more of a warm and fuzzy feeling by using their products or services. And so while there's no federal requirements for these companies to go and purchase carbon credits or or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. There's a commercial incentive to do. So could you points with consumers it can be for all the the companies view. It could be the right thing to do. Farmers have long struggled with low crop. Prices how does this benefit them. Well the benefit for a farmer could be getting a check for doing this. This stuff that we talk about which for a lot of them is the type of thing that they're doing anyway to enrich their soil to get better crop yields for their typical crops and the end result is as we say is that farmers can potentially get paid for this. The company is a are pursuing. This we mentioned some of them. Bear the owner of the monsanto seed business a big agricultural company cargill one of the biggest traders of grain in the world. There's some startups pursuing. This and the idea here is that they can quantify how much carbon these farmers are are questioning in their fields with these practices a certain number of tons per acre they can be paid by the ton or paid by the acre for these practices. All these programs now are in their infancy. In some cases they're pilots and other cases they're meant to be long lasting things with just that the the first innings however the companies that are pursuing this as well as some of the farmers are hopeful that a demand from big companies that want to reduce their carbon footprint or be able to offset parts of their businesses. Might come into this market. Push up the prices for these credits. At the farmers are generating and then in turn produce more income for the farmers jacob. What do environmental activists say about offering credits for carbon capture. Well broadly speaking to the environmental community supports the basic idea. Here that if you manage farm in a more environmentally or climate-friendly way they can have an impact on carbon in the atmosphere and the way that these things are structured. They've got some questions. Some reservations One just in some sense being a philosophical one that if you are offering are making available to a polluting company a carbon offsets that reduces the the environmental groups fear that reduces the incentive for that polluting company to clean up its own operations can continue to function as it has been And pay farmers on the other side. And how does the incoming biden administration intend to approach these sorts of programs. Well tom vilsek. Who was an advisor to the biden campaign and now has been picked to potentially head the usda again. He led the the us department of agriculture during president obama's terms he's talked about putting federal. Usda conservation program funding behind this idea effectively using some conservation programs to incentivize farmers in the same way so the biden administration plans to to put the the federal emphasis behind this same exact idea

Charlie Turner Jacob Cargill Bayer Monsanto Seed The Wall Street Journal Jacob Biden Administration Tom Vilsek Us Department Of Agriculture Biden Barack Obama
Boris Johnson says Britain needs its own Green New Deal

FT Politics

08:07 min | 5 months ago

Boris Johnson says Britain needs its own Green New Deal

"Boris johnson has always been keen to burn it his green credentials and put tackling climate. Change at the front of his government's. Agenda is done so again this week setting out a long-awaited plan to make the uk a world leader in green technology as with most government announcements. However that will plenty of spending commitments already made being re announced but the most auden criticism came from the tories who said it goes against. The party's new electoral base and could cost them votes but business secretary. Alex chama rejected this notion. This is about leveling up across our country. We're talking about twelve billion pounds and he has around. Four billion pounds of this is new money. Other money is money that's been pledged previously on deed lost budget in in in march Book very importantly This billion pounds will help to bring in three times as much in terms of private sector money and supporting create two hundred and fifty thousand jobs but the have been some critics of this plan arguing that it really doesn't go far enough. The shuttle business sexually. Ed milliband made this point. There is an urgency. That isn't enough ambition. That isn't a real plan. He's got to do better in all of our interests that he does better. We will keep pushing the government on ambition on jobs on appropriate plan to rise to the scale of the climate emergency. We face chimp. Let's begin with this. Ten point plan of boys. Johnson set out in article in the financial times. In fact what did you make of it and how much of it was new money and new policy okay so this was a very long awaited announcement. They were meant to originally Back in the summer and it slipped because of pressures on number ten prime minister announced twelve billion pounds states investment program when you went through the numbers at ten about three billion pounds this new at included five hundred million hydrogen one billion pounds insulation three hundred million pounds for nuclear industry. I think what was interesting even if the money was pretty small. Change when you compare it said of the countries like franz chemmy refute these comparisons jeremy kuban late manifesto prince lansing which lici tuten sums of hundreds of billions of pounds of buried money. Guns was agreement. Deo i think it's still a political moment because as always this tension between people saying let's go green other Saying it will damage economy People in cost known areas concerned type. Slutty jim republic who worry about paying extra tax also green initiatives ambrose johnson especially saying worry we can. Tiny's these things together. We make sure. Green economic growth happens in some of the left behind redwood areas and talking about place humble months for over northeast. police o'clock. It's wonderful to have you on the podcast. What were your thoughts. When you saw this announcement here because johnson has talked a lot about green policy arisons locked summer but it fuses if that rhetoric has increase as jim said that is new money on some new policies to go with it to there is a but by i know about this was a. It's brilliant. Hear a british conservative prime minister coming up with a plan like this. Because although we've had david cameron promising the government ever and then we had theresa may actually legislating for a net zero twenty fifty which was very pioneering for a country the size of britain at the time. The thing is. We really haven't seen a prime minister set out in a speech or in a plan like this thing as visionary really and it is a great vision. Unfortunately it's really not matched by detailed plans and considering that a large chunk of it is dependent on trying to mobilize private investor capital. I'm just concerned that it's really not going to make. Investors are not going to invest unless they see the detailed policy until they know what the shape of any sort of regulatory framework has got to look like really not going to get people plowing in at the rate needed to fulfill this and when it comes to actually meeting that net zero goal twenty fifty. It's really not on track to do that. Unfortunately the classic example about chocolate changing which is provided uncertainty from best is if you look at one of the atoms. Boris johnson announcement which was carbon capture storage. Which is basically succour Boats on you bury it. The browns the tools boom cameron government promised been impounds towards that twenty fifteen a group of plug on that money or johnston's done this year's he promised eight hundred pounds in the spring budget yet. Another challenge main pounds this week. Hey presto Where we were five years ago with basically almost leg progress on cca. Yeah that's exactly. It had this sort of crisis. Feel about it really. Is you know god. We've got to do something on climate. Okay what do we do on electric cars. Oh i know will bring the target ford. That's actually relatively easy to do. It's important but unless it's matched by holocene setting out how people are going to be able to buy more electric cars and how the rollout of the charging infrastructure is going to work. You know it's really difficult to see how it works. I expected a guest to say something a little more meditative parts of this plan on you when it comes to the targets for making sure that new homes not built with natural gas boilers in them. For example you know that's really quite important. And of course at target itself has been brought forward slightly from twenty five to twenty twenty three at same these support for hydrogen also important but again. You look at what germany's doing in its recovery plan. It's got around. Forty forty billion set aside for electric cars renewable energy and so forth and france around thirty billion euros set aside nine billion of that is for hydrogen renewables alone so compared to that. The u k plan does look a little small were jim. This is one thing critics of picked up on the plan. Even who is labour's shadow. Business secretary has said it doesn't remotely meet the scale of what is needed. I think greenpeace charity have said similar things to all those criticisms fad. You because when it comes to government spending you can always make the case you should be spending more doing more radical things and as please note. This is a conservative government. This is not natural territory. Full them yet. But i think the first point to make our show on the business sexually set on the radio. This is a down payment but that will be more. Fiscal events is quite possible than the spending review. The we see next week that could be more money for example nuclear. They could say they're gonna stop negotiation sizewell c Pass station which would of course involve more money. And i think as well now. He's talking about how these provides whole sums compared to labor government beginning right now the thing to remember Tackle climate change isn't just about state. Money is also about regulation so of course the bundle twenty fifty borrowing in new pets from these laws as an example of wet government does not have to spend the money it can regulate and things happen and so many of these decisions of stems from theresa. May's decision donning moments of her administration commit twenty-fifty net zero target. Only kind of off the thought. She the mohanchris coop suasion joyfulness. She bandied about it even now known. Would think theresa may is great green ahead and yet she took this decision from which all sorts of future decisions have the stem. But i think to remember names of bishops is very seats. Promotional world where Christie is coming from fossil fuels. Were kind of on talking for. I think you have to remember that. The british energy system like any other system But also transport system unfairly household energy or freeways needs to be decarbonised. And i remember whether we're on track to do that. Speed that needs to

Alex Chama Ed Milliband Boris Johnson Franz Chemmy Jeremy Kuban Prince Lansing Lici Tuten Slutty Jim Ambrose Johnson Cameron Government Financial Times Theresa David Cameron
Boris Johnson says Britain needs its own Green New Deal

FT Politics

08:07 min | 5 months ago

Boris Johnson says Britain needs its own Green New Deal

"Boris johnson has always been keen to burn it his green credentials and put tackling climate. Change at the front of his government's. Agenda is done so again this week setting out a long-awaited plan to make the uk a world leader in green technology as with most government announcements. However that will plenty of spending commitments already made being re announced but the most auden criticism came from the tories who said it goes against. The party's new electoral base and could cost them votes but business secretary. Alex chama rejected this notion. This is about leveling up across our country. We're talking about twelve billion pounds and he has around. Four billion pounds of this is new money. Other money is money that's been pledged previously on deed lost budget in in in march Book very importantly This billion pounds will help to bring in three times as much in terms of private sector money and supporting create two hundred and fifty thousand jobs but the have been some critics of this plan arguing that it really doesn't go far enough. The shuttle business sexually. Ed milliband made this point. There is an urgency. That isn't enough ambition. That isn't a real plan. He's got to do better in all of our interests that he does better. We will keep pushing the government on ambition on jobs on appropriate plan to rise to the scale of the climate emergency. We face chimp. Let's begin with this. Ten point plan of boys. Johnson set out in article in the financial times. In fact what did you make of it and how much of it was new money and new policy okay so this was a very long awaited announcement. They were meant to originally Back in the summer and it slipped because of pressures on number ten prime minister announced twelve billion pounds states investment program when you went through the numbers at ten about three billion pounds this new at included five hundred million hydrogen one billion pounds insulation three hundred million pounds for nuclear industry. I think what was interesting even if the money was pretty small. Change when you compare it said of the countries like franz chemmy refute these comparisons jeremy kuban late manifesto prince lansing which lici tuten sums of hundreds of billions of pounds of buried money. Guns was agreement. Deo i think it's still a political moment because as always this tension between people saying let's go green other Saying it will damage economy People in cost known areas concerned type. Slutty jim republic who worry about paying extra tax also green initiatives ambrose johnson especially saying worry we can. Tiny's these things together. We make sure. Green economic growth happens in some of the left behind redwood areas and talking about place humble months for over northeast. police o'clock. It's wonderful to have you on the podcast. What were your thoughts. When you saw this announcement here because johnson has talked a lot about green policy arisons locked summer but it fuses if that rhetoric has increase as jim said that is new money on some new policies to go with it to there is a but by i know about this was a. It's brilliant. Hear a british conservative prime minister coming up with a plan like this. Because although we've had david cameron promising the government ever and then we had theresa may actually legislating for a net zero twenty fifty which was very pioneering for a country the size of britain at the time. The thing is. We really haven't seen a prime minister set out in a speech or in a plan like this thing as visionary really and it is a great vision. Unfortunately it's really not matched by detailed plans and considering that a large chunk of it is dependent on trying to mobilize private investor capital. I'm just concerned that it's really not going to make. Investors are not going to invest unless they see the detailed policy until they know what the shape of any sort of regulatory framework has got to look like really not going to get people plowing in at the rate needed to fulfill this and when it comes to actually meeting that net zero goal twenty fifty. It's really not on track to do that. Unfortunately the classic example about chocolate changing which is provided uncertainty from best is if you look at one of the atoms. Boris johnson announcement which was carbon capture storage. Which is basically succour Boats on you bury it. The browns the tools boom cameron government promised been impounds towards that twenty fifteen a group of plug on that money or johnston's done this year's he promised eight hundred pounds in the spring budget yet. Another challenge main pounds this week. Hey presto Where we were five years ago with basically almost leg progress on cca. Yeah that's exactly. It had this sort of crisis. Feel about it really. Is you know god. We've got to do something on climate. Okay what do we do on electric cars. Oh i know will bring the target ford. That's actually relatively easy to do. It's important but unless it's matched by holocene setting out how people are going to be able to buy more electric cars and how the rollout of the charging infrastructure is going to work. You know it's really difficult to see how it works. I expected a guest to say something a little more meditative parts of this plan on you when it comes to the targets for making sure that new homes not built with natural gas boilers in them. For example you know that's really quite important. And of course at target itself has been brought forward slightly from twenty five to twenty twenty three at same these support for hydrogen also important but again. You look at what germany's doing in its recovery plan. It's got around. Forty forty billion set aside for electric cars renewable energy and so forth and france around thirty billion euros set aside nine billion of that is for hydrogen renewables alone so compared to that. The u k plan does look a little small were jim. This is one thing critics of picked up on the plan. Even who is labour's shadow. Business secretary has said it doesn't remotely meet the scale of what is needed. I think greenpeace charity have said similar things to all those criticisms fad. You because when it comes to government spending you can always make the case you should be spending more doing more radical things and as please note. This is a conservative government. This is not natural territory. Full them yet. But i think the first point to make our show on the business sexually set on the radio. This is a down payment but that will be more. Fiscal events is quite possible than the spending review. The we see next week that could be more money for example nuclear. They could say they're gonna stop negotiation sizewell c Pass station which would of course involve more money. And i think as well now. He's talking about how these provides whole sums compared to labor government beginning right now the thing to remember Tackle climate change isn't just about state. Money is also about regulation so of course the bundle twenty fifty borrowing in new pets from these laws as an example of wet government does not have to spend the money it can regulate and things happen and so many of these decisions of stems from theresa. May's decision donning moments of her administration commit twenty-fifty net zero target. Only kind of off the thought. She the mohanchris coop suasion joyfulness. She bandied about it even now known. Would think theresa may is great green ahead and yet she took this decision from which all sorts of future decisions have the stem. But i think to remember names of bishops is very seats. Promotional world where Christie is coming from fossil fuels. Were kind of on talking for. I think you have to remember that. The british energy system like any other system But also transport system unfairly household energy or freeways needs to be decarbonised. And i remember whether we're on track to do that. Speed that needs to

Alex Chama Ed Milliband Boris Johnson Franz Chemmy Jeremy Kuban Prince Lansing Lici Tuten Slutty Jim Ambrose Johnson Cameron Government Financial Times Theresa David Cameron
Boris Johnson Lays Out U.K. Plan To Go Carbon Neutral

FT Politics

03:05 min | 5 months ago

Boris Johnson Lays Out U.K. Plan To Go Carbon Neutral

"Johnson has talked a lot about green policy arisons locked summer but it fuses if that rhetoric has increase as jim said that is new money on some new policies to go with it to there is a but by i know about this was a. It's brilliant. Hear a british conservative prime minister coming up with a plan like this. Because although we've had david cameron promising the government ever and then we had theresa may actually legislating for a net zero twenty fifty which was very pioneering for a country the size of britain at the time. The thing is. We really haven't seen a prime minister set out in a speech or in a plan like this thing as visionary really and it is a great vision. Unfortunately it's really not matched by detailed plans and considering that a large chunk of it is dependent on trying to mobilize private investor capital. I'm just concerned that it's really not going to make. Investors are not going to invest unless they see the detailed policy until they know what the shape of any sort of regulatory framework has got to look like really not going to get people plowing in at the rate needed to fulfill this and when it comes to actually meeting that net zero goal twenty fifty. It's really not on track to do that. Unfortunately the classic example about chocolate changing which is provided uncertainty from best is if you look at one of the atoms. Boris johnson announcement which was carbon capture storage. Which is basically succour Boats on you bury it. The browns the tools boom cameron government promised been impounds towards that twenty fifteen a group of plug on that money or johnston's done this year's he promised eight hundred pounds in the spring budget yet. Another challenge main pounds this week. Hey presto Where we were five years ago with basically almost leg progress on cca. Yeah that's exactly. It had this sort of crisis. Feel about it really. Is you know god. We've got to do something on climate. Okay what do we do on electric cars. Oh i know will bring the target ford. That's actually relatively easy to do. It's important but unless it's matched by holocene setting out how people are going to be able to buy more electric cars and how the rollout of the charging infrastructure is going to work. You know it's really difficult to see how it works. I expected a guest to say something a little more meditative parts of this plan on you when it comes to the targets for making sure that new homes not built with natural gas boilers in them. For example you know that's really quite important. And of course at target itself has been brought forward slightly from twenty five to twenty twenty three at same these support for hydrogen also important but again. You look at what germany's doing in its recovery plan. It's got around. Forty forty billion set aside for electric cars renewable energy and so forth and france around thirty billion euros set aside nine billion of that is for hydrogen renewables alone so compared to that. The u k plan does look a little

Cameron Government David Cameron Theresa Johnson JIM Boris Johnson Britain Browns Government Johnston CCA Ford Germany France
Trump and Biden debate their climate and environmental policies

Weekend Edition Sunday

03:42 min | 6 months ago

Trump and Biden debate their climate and environmental policies

"A lot at Thursday's debate. There was this telling exchange about climate change. Would you close the have a transition from their own industry? Yes. It is a big statement, President Trump again boosted the fossil fuel industries contributing to global warming. Joe Biden is campaigning on a plan for Net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. NPR's Jeff Brady has more on his $2 trillion proposal. Joe Biden's climate plan is ambitious for an economy is big and complex as the United States, but even those connected to fossil fuel industry say it may be doable. Scott Siegal with the energy focused law firm. Bracewell says the plan is pragmatic and includes both regulations and incentives for the growing list of companies focused on using cleaner energy in the future. One thing that makes Biden's approach somewhat comfortable is that you can sketch out that linear commitment to additional resource is to achieve these objectives, which I think most people in business, believe me. Are going to be the future anyway. The country has one example of meeting an ambitious climate goal. The Obama administration's clean power plan aimed to cut emissions from power plants, about a third by 2030. Even though court challenges stopped the plan from going into effect, the country is ahead of schedule. David Doniger is with NRDC Action Fund, The political arm of the natural resource is defense counsel. The power sector is already undergoing changes that have reduced their emissions by more than 30% 10 years ahead of the target that the Obama administration thought was aggressive. In 2015, a big part of that was the collapse of the coal industry. Coal fired power plants continue to go out of business, replaced with cheaper natural gas and renewable energy. Still, the bite and climate plan faces significant hurdles. It relies on technologies that haven't been developed or may not be commercially viable. That's why the plan includes $400 billion over a decade for research. With the economic hit from the Corona virus pandemic. Biden's campaign updated the plan this summer. It includes billions of dollars to hire people for things like plugging abandoned mines and building electric vehicle charging stations. Steph Feldman, with the bite and campaign says the plan also focuses on environmental justice. 40% of the benefit of those investments go to community, the color and low income communities that have been disproportionately harmed by pollution and the effects of climate change. This is especially important to the most vocal climate change activists. While Biden has distanced himself from the green new deal, it is popular, especially with the left wing of his party. Jenny Marino, Zimmer with 3 50 actions as this's thie strongest plan yet from a Democratic presidential nominee, the Biden campaign has committed to doing some really great things like ending leasing of fossil fuels on public lands. We'd like to see them go further and create a true phase out for the entire fossil fuel mystery over Of course of the next decade. Biden's plan has a longer timeline for a transition and includes a role for fossil fuels with offsets and carbon capture. Amy Myers Jaffe manages the climate policy Labatt Tufts University and says overall, this is a credible plan for addressing climate change. The Biden campaign has listed the right things. But the difference between listing things and implementing those things is a big difference. If Biden is elected, he'll likely need a Democratic Congress willing to pass laws and allocate money

Joe Biden Obama Administration Fossil Fuel Industries Amy Myers Jaffe Jeff Brady NPR Scott Siegal United States Bracewell Steph Feldman President Trump Nrdc Action Fund Labatt Tufts University David Doniger Congress
Breaking Down Joe Biden's Plan To Make The U.S. Carbon Neutral

Environment: NPR

03:44 min | 6 months ago

Breaking Down Joe Biden's Plan To Make The U.S. Carbon Neutral

"At Thursday's debate, there was this telling exchange about climate change. Would you close the? Transition from oil minister yes. I was trying to. It is a big statement president trump again boosted the fossil fuel industries contributing to global warming. Joe. Biden is campaigning on a plan for net zero greenhouse gas emissions by twenty fifty and peers. Jeff Brady has more on his two trillion dollar proposal Joe Biden's climate plan is ambitious for an economy as big and complex as the United States but even those connected to fossil fuel industry. Say it. May Be Doable Scott Siegel with the energy focused law firm Bracewell says plan is pragmatic and includes both regulations and incentives for the growing list of companies focused on using cleaner energy in the future one thing that makes Biden's approach somewhat comfortable is that you can sketch out that linear commitment to additional resources to achieve these objectives which I think most people in business believe are going to be. The future anyway, the country has one example of meeting an ambitious climate goal. The Obama Administration's clean power plan aimed to cut emissions from power plants about a third by twenty thirty even though court challenges stopped the plan from going into effect, the country is ahead of schedule David. Doniger. IS WITH NRDC Action Fund the political arm of the Natural Resources Defense Council, the power sector is already undergoing. Changes have reduced their emissions by more than thirty percent ten years ahead of the target that the Obama Administration thought was aggressive in two thousand fifteen. A big part of that was the collapse of the coal industry coal fired power plants continue to go out of business replaced with cheaper natural gas and renewable energy. Still, the Biden, climate plan faces significant hurdles it relies on technologies that haven't been. Developed or may not be commercially viable. That's why the plan includes four hundred billion dollars over a decade for research with the economic hit from the coronavirus pandemic Biden's campaign updated the plan this summer it includes billions of dollars to hire people for things like plugging abandoned mines and building electric vehicle charging stations. Steph Feldman with the Biden campaign says, the plan also focuses on environmental justice forty percent. Of the benefits of those investments, go to communities of color and low income communities that have been disproportionately harmed by pollution and the exit climate change. This is especially important to the most vocal climate change activists while Biden has distanced himself from the green new deal. It is popular especially with the left wing of his party Jenny Marino Zimmer with three fifty actions as this is the strongest plan. Yet from a Democratic presidential nominee, the Biden campaign has committed to doing some really great things like ending leasing of also feels on public lands. We'd like to see them go further and create a true phase out for the entire fossil fuel mystery over the course of the next decade. Biden's plan has a longer time line for a transition and includes a role for fossil fuels with offsets and. Carbon Capture Amy Myers Jaffe manages the climate policy lab at Tufts University and says, all this is a credible plan for addressing climate change. The Biden campaign has listed the right things but the difference between listing things and getting those things is a big difference. If Biden is elected, he'll likely need democratic congress willing to pass laws and allocate money to make his plan a reality. Jeff Brady NPR

Joe Biden Obama Administration Fossil Fuel Industries Jeff Brady Jeff Brady Npr Amy Myers Jaffe Natural Resources Defense Coun Nrdc Action Fund Jenny Marino Zimmer United States President Trump Scott Siegel Congress Steph Feldman Bracewell
What Are The Presidential Candidates' Views On Climate Change?

All Things Considered

04:25 min | 7 months ago

What Are The Presidential Candidates' Views On Climate Change?

"News. This is all things considered. I'm Elsa Chang and I'm Ari Shapiro. We're spending a few days this week digging into where the presidential candidates stand on some of the key issues in this election. Today, it's climate change. President Trump and Joe Biden have dramatically different views. Biden has an aggressive plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. President Trump is focused on boosting fossil fuels. We learn more. We're joined by Jeff Brady of NPR's climate team. Hi Jeff Diary start by summing up force. What President Trump has done on climate in his first term climate change is not a priority for him in the past. He's even called it a hoax. But Trump has softened his language a bit on this. At the first presidential debate Last month, the president was asked what he believes about climate change. I want crystal clean water and air. I want beautiful, clean air. We have now the lowest carbon. If you look at our numbers right now, we are doing phenomenally, but I haven't destroyed our businesses. Trump's still doesn't display much understanding about how humans are changing the climate. But as you heard there, he does brag about carbon dioxide emissions from the energy sector going down. That's not because of anything Trump has done. It's because cleaner and cheaper renewable energy and natural gas air replacing coal for generating electricity. Trump has this energy dominance agenda. It's a combination of promoting domestic energy, mostly fossil fuels. And getting rid of regulations that might hinder the drilling and mining that produces those fuels. So he pulled out of the Paris climate agreement. He's rolled back dozens of environmental regulations, including President Obama's clean power plan, and also strict fuel efficiency standards for cars. On the campaign trail. President Trump often ties Joe Biden two proposals like the Green new Deal and banning fracking. Those issues might hurt biting and ki energy producing swing states like Pennsylvania but clear this up for us What our Biden's position On those topics and what are his actual climate proposals? Well, Biden says the green new deal is a good framework. But he has his own climate plan, and the only supports burnt banning new fracking on public land. And there's very little of that. In Pennsylvania on climate change bite an echo scientists that humans are changing the climate and emissions must be reduced quickly. His detailed climate plan has a big job creation focus. He calls for spending $2 trillion over four years for a wide range of environmental projects, Things like plugging abandoned mines and building electric vehicle charging stations across the country. There's so many things that we can do now to create thousands of thousands of jobs. We can get to net zero in terms of energy production by 2035, not only not costing people jobs, creating jobs. On top of that 2035 goal for the electricity sector that he mentioned at the first debate. Biden's plan aims for net zero carbon emissions across the entire US economy, including transportation by 2050. That seems like an enormous pivot. When you think of all the power plant's vehicles, airplanes in the U. S it zbig reach. Is it possible it would cost trillions of dollars and require big changes really fast. Under this plan, fossil fuels, though, would still be used, but there would be offsets and carbon capture projects to reach that. Net zero goal. Biden has a long list of what he calls day. One executive actions Some are about reversing trumps rollback. Something's like methane emissions and those car fuel efficiency standards. There's also directives for the federal government by zero emission vehicles and make buildings more efficient. He has an ambitious legislative agenda that includes an enforcement mechanism mechanism to meet that net zero by 2050 goal. And to do all this. Given the political polarization around climate change, his party probably will have to control both houses of Congress. Looks like Democrats will hold on to the house, but the Senate is still in question there. And if President Trump is re elected, what is his second term climate agenda look like AA lot of the environmental rollbacks from his first four years are being challenged in court now, so resolving those battles and cementing trumps deregulation agenda would be a big focus. He'd continue pushing for more exploration and drilling on public land and offshore. But very little focus on addressing climate change, which you know, scientists say the world needs to do that to minimize its worst effects in coming decades. That's NPR's Jeff Brady. Thanks, Jeff. Thank you. The film

President Trump Joe Biden Jeff Brady Pennsylvania NPR President Obama Jeff Diary Elsa Chang Ari Shapiro Jeff
What Are The Presidential Candidates' Views On Climate Change?

All Things Considered

04:25 min | 7 months ago

What Are The Presidential Candidates' Views On Climate Change?

"All things considered. I'm Elsa Chang and I'm Ari Shapiro. We're spending a few days this week digging into where the presidential candidates stand on some of the key issues in this election. Today, it's climate change. President Trump and Joe Biden have dramatically different views. Biden has an aggressive plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. President Trump is focused on boosting fossil fuels. We learn more. We're joined by Jeff Brady of NPR's climate team. Hi Jeff Diary start by summing up for us. What President Trump has done on climate in his first term climate change is not a priority for him in the past. He's even called it a hoax. But Trump has softened his language a bit on this. At the first presidential debate Last month, the president was asked what he believes about climate change. I want crystal clean water and air. I want beautiful, clean air. We have now the lowest carbon. If you look at our numbers right now, we are doing phenomenally, but I haven't destroyed our businesses. Trump's still doesn't display much understanding about how humans are changing the climate. But as you heard there, he does brag about carbon dioxide emissions from the energy sector going down. That's not because of anything Trump has done. It's because cleaner and cheaper renewable energy and natural gas air replacing coal for generating electricity. Trump has this energy dominance agenda. It's a combination of promoting domestic energy, mostly fossil fuels. And getting rid of regulations that might hinder the drilling and mining that produces those fuels. So he pulled out of the Paris climate agreement. He's rolled back dozens of environmental regulations, including President Obama's clean power plan, and also strict fuel efficiency standards for cars. On the campaign trail. President Trump often ties Joe Biden two proposals like the Green new Deal and banning fracking. Those issues might hurt biting and ki energy producing swing states like Pennsylvania but clear this up for us What our Biden's position On those topics and what are his actual climate proposals? Well, Biden says the green new deal is a good framework. But he has his own climate plan, and the only supports parent banning new fracking on public land. And there's very little of that. In Pennsylvania on climate change bite an echo scientists that humans are changing the climate and emissions must be reduced quickly. His detailed climate plan has a big job creation focus. He calls for spending $2 trillion over four years for a wide range of environmental projects, Things like plugging abandoned mines and building electric vehicle charging stations across the country. There's so many things that we can do now to create thousands of thousands of jobs. We can get to net zero in terms of energy production by 2035, not only not costing people jobs, creating jobs. On top of that 2035 goal for the electricity sector that he mentioned at the first debate. Biden's plan aims for net zero carbon emissions across the entire US economy, including transportation by 2050. That seems like an enormous pivot. When you think of all the power plant's vehicles, airplanes in the U. S it zbig reach. Is it possible it would cost trillions of dollars and require big changes really fast. Under this plan, fossil fuels, though, would still be used, but there would be offsets and carbon capture projects to reach that. Net zero goal. Biden has a long list of what he calls day. One executive actions Some are about reversing trumps rollback. Something's like methane emissions and those car fuel efficiency standards. There's also directives for the federal government by zero emission vehicles and make buildings more efficient. He has an ambitious legislative agenda that includes an enforcement mechanism mechanism to meet that net zero by 2050 goal. And to do all this. Given the political polarization around climate change, his party probably will have to control both houses of Congress. Looks like Democrats will hold on to the house, but the Senate is still in question there. And if President Trump is re elected, what is his second term climate agenda look like AA lot of the environmental rollbacks from his first four years are being challenged in court now, so resolving those battles and cementing trumps deregulation agenda would be a big focus. He'd continue pushing for more exploration and drilling on public land and offshore. But very little focus on addressing climate change, which you know, scientists say the world needs to do that to minimize its worst effects in coming decades. That's NPR's Jeff Brady. Thanks, Jeff. Thank you. The film that

President Trump Joe Biden Jeff Brady Pennsylvania NPR President Obama Jeff Diary Elsa Chang Ari Shapiro Jeff
Wyoming Doubles Down On Its Long Support For Carbon Capture

Morning Edition

03:36 min | 8 months ago

Wyoming Doubles Down On Its Long Support For Carbon Capture

"For NPR news. I'm Cooper McKim in Laramie.

Cooper Mckim NPR Laramie
Wyoming Doubles Down On Its Long Support For Carbon Capture

Environment: NPR

03:35 min | 8 months ago

Wyoming Doubles Down On Its Long Support For Carbon Capture

"US coal production is down to its lowest level in half a century, but the country's largest coal-producing state is desperate to keep the industry going with support from the trump administration. Wyoming is investing big to try and clean up Kohl's carbon emissions. Wyoming public radio's Cooper has more the largest utility in Wyoming Rocky Mountain power has found. It makes economic sense to start retiring. It's coal plants early, an invest heavily and renewables across the West. That isn't going over well in a state whose economy is tied to call. At a recent public hearing county commissioner can't Connolly said when a plant is shutdown, it's not just jobs that are lost by lose. Fifty percent of the taxes is just as simple. Connolly says it doesn't have to be like this coal plants in Wyoming could stick around if utilities just considered retrofitting them to capture the carbon they emit we will change how goal America. There's no doubt about it we'll get. The idea a coal plant would be retrofitted with new tack. Its emissions would be removed and then sold, but rocky mountain power says right now that technology is too expensive and not proven utilities rick, link says its decision is an economic one. Is Driven by. Changes in the heart condition even so Wyoming is doubling down on its long support for carbon capture. This year lawmakers mandated that by twenty thirty utilities produce a certain amount of electricity from coal plants using carbon capture technology ratepayers bear the expensive that the trump administration is also trying to boost carbon capture. It's passed a federal tax credit in his funding research projects. Holly crude cut oversees several through the University of Wyoming. She envisions capturing co two emissions for a variety of profitable uses including turning them into new products. Building Materials asshole replacement. The problem is many others think the moment for Carbon Capture to help Cole has come and Gone Arizona State University's Klaus Lochner remembers giving presentations promoting carbon capture to the coal industry twenty years ago without that, he warned that climate change would be the industry's demise. Is it look if the comes around, you are not going to be allowed to build a new new coal plant because every bank in the country will know that they will not get their money back. So you bid or buy twenty trinite have the ability to build power plants that. Completely carbon neutral but that hasn't happened Energy Economists Rob. God. Says part of the reason could be politics the Republican Party which strongly supports coal actually may have hurt the industry by downplaying climate change climate change doesn't exist. There's no justification to develop low-carbon technologies like carbon capture. So in an ironic way, the Republicans, kill carbon capture as much as anybody else only one coal plant in the US created a successful business model for carbon capture. It's called Petra Nova in Texas, but that fell apart after the pandemic led to an oil price. Crash analysts, Dennis Wanstead with Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis says he can no longer imagine utility saying, Hey, we really WanNa do this. We really want to build a carbon capture facility and we really WANNA put it on our thirty five year old forty-year-old coal plant improve. It's GonNa. Make Money Wyoming Governor. Mark Gordon isn't put off though he points to wind energy, which also needed help early on, but is now a fast growing industry. He says that means you don't give up for NPR news I'm Cooper mckim

Wyoming Wyoming Rocky Mountain Cooper Mckim United States University Of Wyoming Mark Gordon Connolly Commissioner NPR Holly Crude Dennis Wanstead
Makeover: Oil Giant BP Promises to Cut Oil Production, Invest in Renewables

Business Wars Daily

04:09 min | 9 months ago

Makeover: Oil Giant BP Promises to Cut Oil Production, Invest in Renewables

"Somebody had to go I. It's no surprise that Covid Nineteen Delta Draconian blow to the oil and gas industry stay at home orders and line shutdowns of dramatically reduced the need for oil and gas prices and earnings plunged well. Now at least one giant oil company says demand for fossil fuels will never be the same again and it's taking steps not just to pivot, but to make itself over entirely. That business is BP the london-based behemoth last week, the one, hundred, ten year, old company announced a seventeen billion dollar quarterly loss and multibillion dollar writedown of its assets. But what generated headlines was its announcement that over the next decade, it intends to discard its identity as a fossil fuel business. Instead, it'll invest heavily in a wide variety of renewable energy technologies on its way to achieving net zero emissions by twenty fifty. Specifically bb says it will cut oil and gas production by forty percent over the next decade. At the same time, it plans to put ten times as much money into renewable energy investments as it currently does with a goal of investing five billion dollars a year by twenty thirty bio-energy hydrogen, carbon, capture and storage investments in electric vehicle charging stations are all said to be on the menu as our wind and solar. From. A business perspective the move does make some sense BP expects demand for oil to fall between fifty and seventy five percent over the next thirty years as the world attempts to slow global warming. In June BP officials acknowledged that the pain caused to the oil business by the pandemic isn't temporary. It's permanent. They say in a statement, they said covid nineteen would accelerate an existing transition to a lower carbon economy as country seek to quote, build back better meaning in ways less harmful to the environment. The shift is taking a toll on BP's employees. The company announced in June that it plans to lay off ten thousand people. BP's dismal second quarter didn't seem to faze investors instead they embrace the company's new renewable energy shift its share price leapt seven percent on the news stuart joyner an analyst at the market research firm redburn remarked that the move was major positive, thoughtful, and largely unexpected the New York Times reported. Unexpected too many perhaps, but close observers of the company may not have been that surprised. BP has spent the last decade clawing back from its disastrous deepwater horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. For obvious reasons, the company hasn't exactly been a darling of environmentalists, but quickly after becoming CEO in February Bernard Looney made a pledge for BP to achieve net zero emissions by twenty fifty it was the first of giant global oil companies to do so. At the time both socially conscious and traditional investors applauded BP's pledge Andrew Logan and oil and gas director at series a climate change advocacy organization said EP was setting a new standard for leadership in the oil industry CNN reported and Barclays analysts called the plan both fundamental and radical. Last week. Looney. said in a statement quote. This coming decade is critical for the world in the fight against climate change and to drive the necessary change in global energy systems will require action from everyone but so far oil giants. Exxon and Chevron have not followed suit indeed mobile continues to expand oil exploration and production around the world despite its own sharp drop in earnings. The Washington Post reported BP has attempted and failed at other eco, friendly initiatives over the years and BP will continue to invest in and make most of its money from fossil fuels for at least another five years. Still observers agree that this is the company's most transformative move yet, and the realities of business may give BP's ecoconscious strategy more momentum than has existed in the past. As reporter Steven muffs wrote in. The Washington Post for. BP. Is trying to get ahead of what climate change might forced the industry to do. Anyway.

BP Washington Post BB Mexico EP New York Times Exxon Andrew Logan Bernard Looney
Why is this Peruvian farmer suing Germany's largest power company RWE?

Science Friction

05:49 min | 10 months ago

Why is this Peruvian farmer suing Germany's largest power company RWE?

"So. You're bad to make a Peruvian Pharma. WHO's suing Germany's largest power company W? A this is a heist could radically disrupt debate over climate action and week you'll also hear from our wwl representatives in a rare interview about the controversial case. Germany's shutting down all power stations over the next twenty years, so it does that mean for the transition of business. And he gone to meet the man who has become a thorn in the side of fossil fuel companies because he's dredging up their own data to challenge them. This is climate in the courtroom pot one. Murder. Looking. I am suing so that the big companies need to take into account that they should not pollute. Way of saying enough is not. He's not paid by anybody to do this. He knew that it would take years. He knew that could be lost. It could be one. He knew that he would probably be facing some animosity on the ground in his village. But. He decided to do this to just show himself and his children that if there is an injustice you can act upon. or It is like a coal. Companies surely won't even feel since they are so wealthy. We need to start from somewhere. The fend ourselves. Another goal. Record. No nobody's asking to shut up shop. We know that this transformation will take decades on the corporations can lead that effort transforming companies from simply providing liquid fuels for example. To invest in carbon capture sequestration to invest in offshore wind, for example particularly in the rich, western, world, concluding Australia where the preponderance of historic emissions have enabled our economies to grow wealthy. We need to decarbonised faster than the developing world so that they can have a chance. Proper development as well. What is the concern of people who live on islands where the water level rises? What is the concern of people who suffer from hurricanes that haven't been there before? Their concern is that greenhouse gases must be reduced greatly of course, our responsibility as a power generator through reduce your to emissions, and that's what we're doing. Closing down power stations, investing into renewable supporting co two targets, also the embiid ones porting energy transition. Third episode where taking you to the Philippines for human rights showdown over climate change that's commanding attention, even in the face of president deterred has discords for drug uses and jailing of journalists, but first. Why is a Peruvian Pharma and Mountain God in the central Andes, attracting such international attention? My Name is Dr Road of. I'm a lawyer in private practice on my practices located in Hamburg. Germany and I represent so Luciano you in his quest and case against. With just German Energy Utility look the road of a high and is regular attorney in private practice, but before that she co founded the pioneering Ngo, the Climate Justice Program in two thousand and three ended her PhD on international climate, protection law, after years working in climate policy. What I find is that people have been coming to me increasingly in the last ten years. Asking for advice on what you know what you could do with respect to the increasing inadequacy of action with regard to what the science tells us. And then in two thousand, fourteen I decided to take on the first case with just this RWE case since they've multiplied and the man at the heart of bet, landmark case was half a world away at the end of a correctly online. My name is sold. Luciano you year I am and guide. From family of a small apartments, daughter I am a forty years of age or the. So who lives in the bustling town of us and in the mountains, above what else is a gateway for tourists heading off on hogging adventures in the stunning coordinator Blanca Mountain range of the central, Andes. But for locals, those mountains are life. Komo From clouds he goes to the moments and these hills with our culture in the area. There is a great dependency on the fence in agriculture in what us. The Mon I are everything for a farmer in a month and guide. It is like an office that gives you subsistence cool more fifteen. About two. Hundred. And my client is assistance the with his family in the Small Village Code Yuba. I'm he plans potatoes and vegetables, and I'm raises Guinea pigs to then have food. He has children and his own old parents. So in the season he will take tourists up to the glaciers and Laguna. And so did his father when he was little bit younger,

Germany Peruvian Pharma Luciano Private Practice Small Village Code Yuba Climate Justice Program Murder RWE Laguna Andes Hamburg Blanca Mountain German Energy Utility Philippines Australia Coordinator
"carbon capture" Discussed on The Current

The Current

07:32 min | 1 year ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on The Current

"So electric planes making jet fuel from carbon dioxide sucked out of the air. It sounds like the future is now all right. Cool your debts bit. There are still some pretty serious challenges ahead. David thing is distinguished professor in computational aerodynamics and sustainable aviation at the University of Toronto and he joins me in Toronto Studio Hello Hello Laura Harbor. Air Isn't the only company in the race to build electric planes. What kind of work are we seeing in the area? Electrification is really a big deal right now But as was mentioned by the previous Interviewee the applications to long range aircraft are very limited because of the weight of the batteries required so electric aircraft are wonderful for the application. That harbor air hasn't mind a short range lights like that and urban air mobility but but for flying five hours and up. It's a long way away and so are there. Many other electric planes and development right now yes especially in the urban air mobility a sector air taxi around the world. Yes Okay Greg. McDougal is optimistic. Though that has batteries improve he'll be able to power a fourteen seat otter aircraft craft. How big a plane could reasonably be powered by electricity? I think it's a combination of size and range so I I think it'll be a long time before you can fly say over. I mean if you look at the range of electric cars. It's quite limited. Cars aren't as limited in in terms of weight. They can carry a heavy heavy battery around but an aircraft heavy battery is is very punitive. So I think it'll be a long time before you'll be flying more than fifty to one hundred miles on electric aircraft an aircraft the size of an auditor. Would that be possible as well or do you think that that's just simply too big a weight to carry. No I think a Aircraft sizes less of a concern than the range. Okay so. What are the limits on? The potential then of electric planes is. Is it just that that they just can't can't be able to carry a big enough battery to go well. I don't think we can say can't because it depends on the evolution of battery technology. But but I don't think we'll see for example an aircraft the size of a seven thirty seven for over twenty years with an electric engine. Okay so we also heard about the alternative fuel that carbon engineering is developing. What do you see as the potential of that technology so that's huge And and really carbon engineering deserves a lot of credit for what they're doing Just a few things to keep in mind Is that one. Is that the impact of aviation on. Climate change is not solely to carbon dioxide so if we eliminate or effectively eliminate the carbon dioxide emissions. Since then we're still left with the other contributions which include nitrogen oxides and connotation and trails which form aviation what we call aviation induced cirrus so carbon dioxide is about forty percent of the impact of aviation on climate change range so eliminating that would be wonderful but we still need to work on the other sixty percent. Steve Oldham suggested airline start building their carbon capture plants now to decarbonised carbonized the industry. What impact would that have so that would be enormous Do you see that that happening that the industry would adopted that much. Yes I think that the the twenty five percent premium he mentioned is significant but not a show stopper and and I think what we need to do in combination is designed more fuel-efficient airplanes and come up with more fuel-efficient engines. That would make up for that twenty five percent. How's the industry doing in that area? Very well I'm in progresses. Slow and steady I would say so We probably progress with the efficiency of aircraft about one percent percent a year which sounds small but it adds up But one of the problems is that governments are very big on supporting biofuels and things. He's like that but they do a lot less to help. develop more fuel-efficient airplanes and things like that which is just as important. Can you give me an idea of what. What low emitting aircraft? Might be like I mean I know. Weren't they building the Max to be more fuel-efficient yeah I I mean one of the problems with the PR of the aviation industry. Is that the planes all look the same and of look the same for a long time but yeah the the modern aircraft is far for more fuel efficient than aircraft of thirty years ago but the next generation of aircraft may be appearing in maybe twenty forty timeframe could radically different for example. A flying wing type of airplane or something which might Offer to your savings of up to twenty percent so what what a what about the worry. Then that these kinds of technologies and changes mask relief issue that people just need to fly less yes. People should fly less and and be very conscientious in deciding how important flight is but I think that if we can counteract the need to fly less by doing things more efficiently and doing this Carbon capture and working activation into the process. Otaly we can still fly Maybe maybe not have to reduce our flying as much as we would otherwise but we still would have to. I think everyone should be conscious of reducing our carbon footprint. And I I I think there are things I would give up before flying like I was reading just recently that streaming and the farms the server farms associated with streaming contributed a lot to To CEO OUT OF CO two. So I I would give up streaming before I'd give up fly. A number of major airlines Qantas British Airways Air France have pledged to get to net zero emissions by two two thousand and fifty. I'm wondering how realistic you think that is I think they're talking against strictly about carbon dioxide and So that they still would have that. That doesn't mean net zero climate change impact. So I think it's important for people to realize that but as far as Some claim like that. I think it's based on offsets so so it doesn't really mean that were carbon-neutral it means that we're doing something else to offset the flight so The only real hope of being a truly carbon-neutral is to combine to do as much as we can tannen every way but to combine biofuels in the kind of carbon capture that that was discussed earlier. And how much is biofuels playing a part in aviation right now very a little right now. But I think that it's huge part of the future for for reducing the impact but it it shouldn't be perceived as a silver bullet. There's there are lots of costs and in even energy requirements even the carbon capture requires a clean energy clean source of energy. So it does all come down to having clean energy sources right. We will leave it there David thing thank you greg. Thank you for having me. David Zing is University of Toronto. Distinguished professor in Computational Oh Arrow Dynamics and sustainable aviation. He was in our Toronto Studio for more C._B._C.. PODCASTS Goto Dot C._A. Slash podcasts..

David Zing Toronto University of Toronto distinguished professor Greg urban air Laura Harbor British Airways Air France Steve Oldham McDougal Computational Oh Arrow Dynamic auditor CEO
"carbon capture" Discussed on The Energy Podcast

The Energy Podcast

03:17 min | 2 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on The Energy Podcast

"The world up to with this technology carbon capture storage all the idea of carbon capture and storage has been around for many decades. It was first invented in nineteen seventy seven by Caesar machete in Italy. But it didn't really get any traction with industry and business until the nineteen nineties. When people started working on the practicalities of storage of CO, two deep underground and discovered that the could actually be really quite a lot of carbon dioxide storage in geological formations which would safely and securely keep that underground for tens of thousands of years into the future. They technology that was sort of really born in the nine hundred ninety s is it. Fit for purpose. I think the technology certainly functions. It's it's a collection of technologies that have been in existence in the oil and gas industry for for many decades. I think if you look at the current global energy system, there are number of places where they just aren't alternative technologies to replace the use of fossil fuels. And so even the most optimistic scenario in terms of decarbonisation, you're still going to have considerable emissions and carbon capture and storage can be applied on an industrial scale to those lodge. Sources it works. It's been proven that it works. I think. Yeah. It's very fit for purpose. I'm sure the technology will evolve further as more installations built. But where it stands today? It's ready to roll. Let's now gets a crash course in from one of the wills largest projects. Quest. The Edmonton Canada is a shell CCS facility. It prevents over million tons of co two from reaching the atmosphere. Each year on holiday is an adviser on the project and best place to explain exactly what happens. Here at quest. We've taken some high-quality sources of carbon dioxide and figure way to capture that carbon dioxide transported and stored safely. It's actually very simple. It's very standard method of gas processing. So we use a lot of different different applications all over the world here at quest. The evening is designed to preferentially grab that carbon dioxide as opposed to all the other gases that are in that streamed that aiming then goes to another tower, which we call the stripping tower, and they're the immunise separated from the carbon dioxide, they use steam, and what the steam does is it raises the temperature so win that aiming solution is heated up it releases the carbon dioxide the carbon dioxide that's been released its then taken off the top of that stripping tower, and then brought into dehydration and compression, the storage part is basically putting the carbon dioxide. Somewhere where it is going to be permanently and safely stored here. At quest. We found one of the safest places in the world to permanently store the carbon dioxide in a ceiling reservoir, two kilometers in the ground. Stuart Hazell deemed from the university of Edinburgh. Do you think the price of this technology is like to full with innovation?.

Italy Caesar Stuart Hazell Edmonton Canada university of Edinburgh two kilometers million tons
"carbon capture" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

WNYC 93.9 FM

01:33 min | 3 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on WNYC 93.9 FM

"A lump of coal and say they scrub the call the kennedy clean it's clear that our leadership doesn't understand clean coal means the industry as i understand it and and bill can correct me if i'm wrong is looking at technologies like carbon capture sequestration scrubbing co two from from smoke stacks i think the reality though is that we have not seen ccs technologies in the united states work at scale uh the global ccs institute has noted we have we in the united states have nine operating largescale ccs a carbon capture and storage facilities right now two of those are from power generation the rask from industrial sources said this is not about coal power again that's acknowledging particular takes a lot of energy so you have to burn more energy to put that technology in place and it takes a lot of water in order to save it well let me just tons of benjamin's and then the the ccs that the john and redness talking about carbon capture and storage a a we anywhere near or renewing their course on all fronts absolutely correct as as notice bruising not at all but are you know i think that that's an unfortunate fact but when we ask ourselves why are one of the things i look out his over the past ten years old sorry we've put about eight hundred ninety billion dollars worth of subsidies into renewable technologies for example and about twenty billion oh sorry into carbon capture and storage and that's not to attack renewable societies is where the policy priorities of being port by governments is to to drive that development of renewables now the intergovernmental panel on climate i'm a change says that action on climate change without carbon capture and storage is going to be a hundred and thirty eight percent more expensive so carbon capture and.

clean coal united states global ccs institute carbon capture benjamin climate change kennedy eight hundred ninety billion d thirty eight percent ten years
"carbon capture" Discussed on KKOB 770 AM

KKOB 770 AM

02:13 min | 3 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on KKOB 770 AM

"Your call my friend don't hang up doug indianapolis indiana one of my favorite cities and i mean it they great w f d m go highmore our carbon capture of toward 14year ours girl uh chauvet are mischief but uh understand are the guy stole marked under a previous call but don't understand why they can't go with a third straight tax willing plus but of take all of our money home and will we go out and buy something we pay a certain seven percent how close water they come up with but will get so much on all the time it's not even funny they'll tell you why they won't do it it takes their power away they can redistribute wealth they'd the lobbyists aren't going to be knocking on their doors anymore you've got people now who are invested heavily uh from a power perspective and and a financial perspective in the internal revenue coat that like being able to go up the mitch mcconnell and cutting a deal and then giving him a major campaign contribution if you had a nice tax say a nice clean tax system at the national sales tax and of course you would have to um you'd have to repeal the 16th amendment you don't want to have a national sales tax like a vat tax and all of a sudden you have an income tax on top of it so but i agree with you and you know i'm i'm supporting the convention of states article five to eliminate the progressive income tax nothing progressive abandoned its regressive it uh it destroys jobs it destroys um uh opportunities it destroys people are trying to climb up the ladder of success but we don't have people who support this in in the federal government we just don't i think so and also the up at our tara wars travel for our country i my friend i appreciate your call let's continue um salaam i think it is right mr callscreener is that right sologne you say salaam i alone you say tomato i say tomato coral springs florida on.

indianapolis carbon capture mitch mcconnell sales tax income tax mr callscreener florida indiana seven percent 14year
"carbon capture" Discussed on KOIL

KOIL

01:55 min | 3 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on KOIL

"Crtv thank you for your call my friend don't hang up doug indianapolis indiana one of my favorite cities and i mean it they great w f d m go higher our carbon capture of horrid 438 ours girls uh with our mischief but uh i don't understand our regard stole more tonder a previous call the uh i don't understand why they can't go with a plus straight tax plus but of take call hormone home and we'll we go out and buy something we pay a certain tax seven percent templestowe close at whatever they come up with but we'll get so much on my return it's not even funny tell you why they won't do it it takes their power away they can't redistribute wealth they had the lobbyists aren't going to be knocking on their doors anymore you've got people now who are invested heavily uh from a power perspective and and financial perspective in the internal revenue code that like being able to go up the mitch mcconnell cutting a deal and then giving them a major campaign contribution if you had a nice tax say a nice clean tax system of the national sales tax and of course you would have to uh uh you'd have to repeal the 16th amendment you don't want to have a national sales tax like a vat tax and all of a sudden you have an income tax on top of it so but i agree with you and you know i'm i'm supporting the convention of states article five to eliminate the progressive income tax nothing progressive abandoned its regressive it destroyed jobs that destroys the opportunities it destroys people are trying to climb up the ladder of success but that we don't want people who support this in in the federal government we just don't i think so i know so via at us this terrible terrible far cranberry all right my friend.

indianapolis carbon capture mitch mcconnell sales tax income tax indiana seven percent
"carbon capture" Discussed on Quirks and Quarks

Quirks and Quarks

01:35 min | 3 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on Quirks and Quarks

"If everything it doubles it's growth rate then maybe it could be a good thing but that's not what we saw not all the species are able to increase that rate and we really saw one species takeover that space kind of indications that were heading towards a monoculture which wouldn't be great and future waiver less resilient to change if we just have the one species that would survive and tolerate that increase it also another important feature if these organisms that feeding on the plankton and out of the water column at draws carbon down into the sea floor ansa kinda key creates negative carbon gradient kollek harden carbon capture and which could be a positive thing if we were able to stainless this growth and some of the biodiversity as well well g if if they're drawing down carbon from the atmosphere if they're the bottom of the food chain there's more of them that means more food tells like a winwin situation what are the downside i think the downside is that monoculture or just the indication that some animals may not be out to survive what does the loss of those organisms mean who who would suffer the rare species and anything that feeds on them so you can imagine if something was selectively feeding on the the one animal or the to animals that grew well they may defray well if he were selectively feeding on one of the other animals over missing something from your diet as such you may not be able to five as well what's your biggest concern based on what you've seen.

carbon capture food chain
"carbon capture" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

Newsradio 700 WLW

02:30 min | 3 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW

"Blamed president trump port it anyway so here's the thing about colin kaepernick i've i've talked to a couple of people who are actually our lawyers and they know the law and they don't think he'll get very far he's gonna have to produce a lot of evidence in other words emails phone calls communications between nfl teams saying they conspired to keep him out of work in the the nfl simply because of his protests his very public protests that colin kaepernick not working right now he says the nfl has colluded against him now i firmly believe the carbon capture nick knows why he started this nonsense i'm sure but i was wondering i've question how many other nfl players who participated in the kneeling before the anthem before the flag protest actually know what they're protesting i know the eight nine yearolds and pewee who saw this on tv who were kneeling have no idea what they're protesting but supposedly there was a pole and i'm not saying that all of the answers are given in this response from deary jeff walker at 700 wlw dot com i'm sure i'll be called racist for recounting some of the answers of the nfl players who were allegedly pulled when asked exactly what they were approach testing but here are some of the answers that were given you decide a sampling responses the question what are you protesting by kneeling during the national anthem one players response was pretty sure it's against nazis especially them's white ones we're protesting america becoming capitalistic instead of equal and actually true capitalism as the ultimate equality but never mind i'm not going to argue with a page somebody i don't know who doesn't know what they're talking about another one of the responses of what these nfl players were protesting i'm protesting against trump saying black lives don't matter i don't recall the president ever saying black lives don't matter interesting here's what here's a good one we're against global warming.

colin kaepernick nfl nick jeff walker trump president global warming carbon capture america
"carbon capture" Discussed on Probably Science

Probably Science

01:50 min | 3 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on Probably Science

"I ask i guess that's how it all started back in the nineties prince fahmi a homeopath adulterer what month so this this new movement argues the grazing cattle on pastas is actually good for the climate the idea is the plant some postures capture carbon from the air specially when fertilized by manure and they should also reduce our need for food crops grown on land that releases carbon when ploughed confused by conflicting claims gone it and her colleagues calculate the flow free in house gases into and out to postures she found that in some circumstances you can get carbon capture but not always and the effect isma'il you cannot extrapolate from a nicely run dorsett farm to a global food strategy at best carbon capture only offsets twenty sixty percent of greenhouse gas emissions from grazing mostly the methane from cattle and the carbon capture stop softer few decades when the carbon in rich soils reach equillibrium with the ad meanwhile the cattle continued to belt meephan belching is pudding and politely via the analysis is more comprehensive than pasta as says tim benton at the university of leeds it also if we are to eat meat is there a better way to grow it and the answer is not really supporters of cattlegrazing on giving up just yet though they say some say cattle has simply replaced wild ruminants which also release methane but ghana points out many cattle especially in the tropics graze on form of forest land in places such as the brazilian amazon clearing trees for cattle causes massive greenhouse gas emissions at low densities of around one animal per hectare carbon capture and soils could still exceed methane emissions says regis young of the sustainable food trust in bristol which supports cattlegrazing however he can seize this is not true a high densities.

food crops carbon capture dorsett farm greenhouse gas emissions tim benton ghana bristol prince fahmi university of leeds twenty sixty percent
"carbon capture" Discussed on The Stephen A. Smith Show

The Stephen A. Smith Show

01:57 min | 4 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on The Stephen A. Smith Show

"And that's what we've done with the kneeling has created has another barrier i got you appreciate your call minute thank you for your service i could you see you in the military thank you so much let's go to tom in san francisco you live stephen they real quick tomboy ably yeah stephen a uh you know i think a lot of people they don't know how to having a homegrown san francisco forty nine your giants warriors fan and kick a seasonticket holder this deal with carbon capture neck you don't want this coast he for so much deeper the forty nine your organization we'll go back to the 80s when they s that greatest owner in national football league history fed cheever tolo added he bad classiest organization in the his in football and they know funny in those days would have thought of doing this had no reason why they had a great bunch you guys said what of all stuck together and possibly at a different way that embarrassed the city of san francisco forty nine years they season ticket holders on how did he embarrass you embarrassed the organization and ten fans spike doing that this is not the way to do a protest t mobile how does this do you agree with me in protest at the national anthem but how does he embarrass you how will you as a fan personalising it what did he do to do that embarrassed you i can understand him tick you off i can understand you not liking it but how worst you affected to the point where you were embarrassed personally.

tom san francisco cheever tolo football stephen giants carbon capture forty nine years
"carbon capture" Discussed on Afternoons with Marcellus & Kelvin

Afternoons with Marcellus & Kelvin

01:44 min | 4 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on Afternoons with Marcellus & Kelvin

"If they have a job than what you there if it was about he'll in cohen is better than them empirically objectively why doesn't the of a job my friend i must disagree with you which is to my pero and she i'm quaking in my book a great deal it but i gotta tell you that he's all about the black ball in their fence that that carbon capture nick has the skills look i was there in the stadium when he almost one that super bowl heavy decline of course he is is he not the same player not he ain't but why is that they're black people got to be joe louis or or kareem abduljabbar they're convinced settlers in our community to why we gotta be the super why we gotta be look bronner cobi why can't we just be uh jj reading or you know so the point is this that that you're absolutely right in the sense that his players that they were here cam newton it would be a more difficult cell but because he's a rather more marginal way not markieff he'll get skilley still above average footprints he's not a superstar he gets treated like the dregs of the earth respect you must observe objects this question i retort you say this dna phil experienced stand for not so long which means we can discriminate against you do too short should utah you too fat you too slow you too old you turn thirty we can say by by this bring it to the copremier occurred american experience this talk about a guy who has to come as a package will we balance the equation between which give us on the field and which bringing us in terms of attention what do you say to them when you see that equation out of sort were colin kaepernick.

cohen pero phil colin kaepernick carbon capture super bowl joe louis kareem abduljabbar bronner newton utah
"carbon capture" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

WIBC 93.1FM

02:01 min | 4 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM

"Either walking home from school warplane and something happened where she was hit by the train but she's alive today because the quick actions of our first responders officer morgan so that's a hammers heroes segment right there for sure that is how to ace saving someone's life like that that's fantastic you mentioned carbon capture nick a second ago nigel and it seems like every body on social media wants carbon capture nic to have a job they want to force the hand of nfl owners and saying lesson interceptions be dam you're going to take this guy here lost her because he deserves it that's what the guy i don't understand is like so if you get your wit like who would you make take colin kaepernick who are you looking at what danger gin and say you need to take him because i know better than you right and you've used this term before i think it's the vocal minority that are wanting carbon capture dick to be forced on an nfl roster i think it is going to have the ignore this guy for him to disappear i don't think here's the thing and as messed up is the sounds i think he's probably gonna wind up our last year before the start of the regular season i don't know who went unaware somebody's going to get desperate in they're going to need a quarterback and quarterbacks with his experience especially in the super bowl are hard to come by they are hard to find out so i leagues somebody somewhere is going to pick them up and here's the other day i disagree with what he did i don't like him i don't like the boycott i didn't like the piggy sox i don't really care about him i say i don't care about him but if he winds up starting for an nfl team i i'm going to be honest and say i'd probably check it out at least just to see how he does make sense sure on honey i've just i've probably would check it out because no like a good circus janet of tim tibo got signed by somebody of johnny manziel got signed by somebody i got to see the circus now i know i'm going to get tweet i would never watch him at a million years i'm gonna shut my tv of their alleged nfl game if he's ever the nfl again i don't i don't.

morgan carbon capture nigel social media colin kaepernick super bowl janet tim tibo johnny manziel officer nfl million years
"carbon capture" Discussed on Mornings with Keyshawn, Jorge & LZ

Mornings with Keyshawn, Jorge & LZ

01:31 min | 4 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on Mornings with Keyshawn, Jorge & LZ

"Good morning i think play listening to us yesterday we're talking with the oh g museum get to that just a second george put up a poem by okay all right that's right now yes go okay the poll is are you going to boycott the nfl of carbon capture nic does make an opportunity am i going to boycott the the nfl why was in in the nfl when colin kaepernick was doing what he was doing so they're not going to boycott the nfl when the other way not asking a question sapone farm jews answering the polka sean give you my it's all right i'm not concerned about you 'cause i have three hours with you to discuss yes has a so a question again which you boycott the nfl if colin capital doesn't do not paternity not a job but an opportunity because i just read that the baltimore ravens and starting qb is gonna be out for a little bit because of a boat disc in his back they signed a qb from the arena football league ya the arena football league how 'bout if we have a we do it this way would you ever boycott the nfl who just period just period yes is there anything either the players or the owners can do there were cause you to boycott the inner france agreater question repace replacement players replacement players were canneries i will watch it you remarked canneries again i do like kanema seaquarium of the cover band.

oh g museum george nfl carbon capture colin kaepernick baltimore ravens france canneries football three hours
"carbon capture" Discussed on Nature Podcast

Nature Podcast

02:32 min | 4 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on Nature Podcast

"Yes does while maybe maybe too many given or her cable her earl give you a billion who you um well i think i would also invest a person heavily in in many greats a across the regions where uh liquification has been an has not been post many grids being power grids on much smallest scales that connect people in a small area rather than across an entire country regentkenothis is one area where we've made quite lord of interesting breakthroughs on on large scale we can go as far as you know doings of intercontinental connections on the offgrid cite the same thing standalone systems are you know operation on in in their millions but i think the real uh you know the real breakthrough that needs to happen in order to be able to scale up electrification is going to be in the mini greets area so that'll be where i would invest my money nigel we've had storage we've had many grids t have anything further to invest your money janowski added another note on the villa senator ii completely agree with the previous two suggestions which are familiar both around this issue around flexibility and time shifting supplydemand which is so helpful in lowering the cost of transitioning to a low carbon energy system unser as those have been taken i will put carbon capture and storage and the mix i'm perhaps unglamorous because it it implies a continuing access to fossil fuels but i think in terms of i'm there are so many countries which rely on fossil fuels indiaandchina are two of them but in over 80 of the primary energy supply in the uk is still fossil and we must get it is not just all about powerful said transport fuels and insulza heat which is a big deal absorb carbon capture and storage can we really demonstrates aba technological means to sequester stole reuse cco two in a in a way that is costeffective and at the same time we can be consistent with the two degreec aims with one an off greece aims at a paris the may i think it's a risk to not developed that technology sat so that those countries that want to or choose to politically must use the fossil reserves i'm in have no option other than to mitzi or two in very large.

senator carbon capture energy supply uk greece paris energy system mitzi
"carbon capture" Discussed on PBS NewsHour

PBS NewsHour

01:47 min | 4 years ago

"carbon capture" Discussed on PBS NewsHour

"Displayed behind me the same rick perry who wrote a book called and climate scientists members of a secular carbon cult who manipulate data and climate science a contrived phony mess but not here it shows we don't have to pin the environment on one side wayne and the economy on the other side we can and we will be good stewards of both the steward of this project for nrg is david greeson the vice president of development were interested in doing more carbon capture as a part of our overall uh sustainable energy future plan and so we're going to see how this works they call the billion dollar carbon capture and storage system petra nova nrg built it in partnership with the japanese oil company j acts nippon using a one hundred ninety million dollar grant from the department of energy doled out during the obama administration nor capturing about two hundred tons of co two per hour on an annual basis that's about one point six million tonnes per year the equivalent of three hundred fifty thousand cars being taken off the road while it may be the world's largest carbon capture facility it is still only removing about ten percent of the c o two created by the four coalfired generators here the only obstacle to capturing more is money where just now reaching the point where this technology is mature enough to be considered role to roll out to the the fraud coalfired fleet in the united states and around the world.

rick perry wayne david greeson carbon capture obama administration fraud united states vice president of development sustainable energy oil company one hundred ninety million dol six million tonnes two hundred tons billion dollar ten percent