3 Burst results for "Brian Hagedorn"

"brian hagedorn" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

News Talk 1130 WISN

08:56 min | 1 year ago

"brian hagedorn" Discussed on News Talk 1130 WISN

"At the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Uh, posted this story about the state Democratic convention. Just put it up there for me. This is exactly what I'm talking about. This was catnip. To an obviously partisan journalists like Molly back. I'm assuming I didn't read The Associated Press account, but I'm sure it was somewhat similar. It's all about the conflict. Trump is calling out Republican legislative leaders by name now. President Trump Republicans responded by the way. Capping a said Mr President. I'm a big fan of yours. But you're just wrong on this one. We are investigating. We've got three former police officers overseen by now An attorney has been hired to oversee this election. They're looking into Look, folks. There was an audit of Dominion voting systems, okay, and it did find an error. But it was a benign error. It was one that just okay, These sorts of things happen. These sorts of issues were already investigated in Wisconsin. What was found and what the trump campaign actually very successful and very persuasively argued, Although the Wisconsin Supreme Court led by alleged conservative Brian Hagedorn used the doctrine of latches to essentially put on the issue and latches essentially means that well, they they didn't really they had a case. Okay, fine. They might have had a case, but they needed to bring this before the election, in other words, that the issue was already settled, so there's no real remedy and I don't necessary. Really disagree, because what the what the I do agree with, by the way, disagree with using latches they needed to issue a definitive ruling about all of the rules that were changed all of the laws that were changed shortly before the 2020 election. What obviously was being done at the state and the municipal level. In order to put the thumb on the scales in favor of Democrats. What I disagree with was the idea here that hundreds of thousands of votes I believe the total was like 100 9000 or something like that should be thrown out after these people were voting. In accordance with what their municipal courts. Municipal clerks were telling them what the Wisconsin Election Commission was telling them. So what I would posit would be that the Supreme Court needed to rule But it couldn't possibly disenfranchise. It couldn't possibly just throw out 109,000 votes. I mean, what do you think would happen if that was the precedent if the state Supreme Court Essentially nullified an election or even worse. Handed the election to the guy who got fewer votes. Month and a half later. What do you suppose every single liberal Supreme Court in every single liberal state would do every time? That's not a hypothetical by God. Democrats tried to it, a Republican congresswoman in Iowa won by about 20 votes or five votes or whatever it was Nancy Pelosi literally tried to undo the will of the people by not said sitting that congresswoman. It was only when this little plot was uncovered and there was widespread outrage. That it was abandoned. That Pelosi said. Okay, Okay, okay. We're finally going to see this woman. Instead of this effort to essentially nullify the whim, the will of the voters on what amounts to a partisan whim. Now imagine a state Supreme Court doing the exact same thing, however. The fraud that was uncovered. Wise. Essentially being committed by people who are in charge of the elections. This is far easier to find, but it's far more difficult to undo. Forensic audit, therefore, likely would not find enough votes. That I mean, you can do signature matching and all of this signature matching is rather difficult, though. Because When you sign something your signature does change. For example. Do you know how hard it is to go on eBay or Amazon and find authentic signed merchandise? I would advise very strongly never to do that. You would be shocked as you know, I'm a big fan of Hamilton. So is my family. So I got my brothers signed pictures of Lin Manuel Miranda and is Hamilton costume? I eventually went to a licensed dealer to make sure I was getting an actual autograph. Lin Manuel Miranda apparently has about 50 different signatures. But when you go and look at, as I did last November, December when you go and look at the actual signed Lin, Manuel Miranda merchandise and pictures and all of that, you'll notice that his signature does actually very dramatically. Because he's signing it very quickly. Better example for you and your personal life Do you ever have when you use your credit card? You have to sign the little digital box. I guarantee your signature looks nothing like it actually does. If you're anything like me half the time, I just make a little smiley face. In lieu of my signature. I mean, it's obviously going to be me. But the point is that the signature matching is not the panacea that you might think it is. Now. I'm not saying That this sort of forensic audit might not Result in in a finding, But here's the fundamental problem with all that. Governor Evers would veto and use every executive trick and tool. He has to stop anything. The Legislature orders. Right. It's actually sort of miraculous. The Department of Justice is not working to stop the Legislature's investigation that's going on right now. So President Trump Is indeed wrong to sort of lash out at the idea that Republicans aren't doing enough. In fact, Republicans in the Legislature just unveiled a sweeping series of bills that of course Evers is going to to reject there's been a proposal for a constitutional voter Integrity amendment. Which I think would would do wonders to eliminate the the authority that a governor would have to try to block any effort at election integrity. But there's been multiple investigations. We had a recount the the idea here. That Republicans aren't doing enough. Is, I'm sorry to say rooted in Trump's own ignorance about what's actually going on on the ground in Wisconsin. We will go to the phones. Let's start with Matt in Burlington, You're on the Dan O Donnell show. Hey, two quick points. I can't say that he's wrong because I don't know how many calls Robin Boss's office got now. This is outside the forensic audit. But the overall Robin Voss as a speaker, runs the ship for Wisconsin. They're in charge of the appointment of a few members of the Wisconsin Elections Commission, and I made nine phone calls to his office before democracy in the park even started doesn't have somebody to get down there and get on it. And under his watch asleep at the switch that went down to the to to 20,000 votes. Indian County that should not count who was the candidate that was on the ballot there, though. Who is the Republican candidate. Donald Trump. Okay. Did Donald Trump have a campaign in Wisconsin? Yes. Would it be fair to say that the Trump campaign, which would actually be the party to the suit was also asleep at the switch on that one. I asked about that. I understand. They reached out to Robin lost in the assembly to take care of that year with our Wisconsin legislatures, and they chose not to do that. No, they had attorneys who are at the ready. Nobody wanted to do that, because they didn't want to upset the apple cart. They wanted to look, there was there was a lot of confidence, I think On the part of Republic. I'm not absolving. Believe me, I'm not absolving boss or the Republican Party of Wisconsin of any blame. But let's just be clear. The Trump campaign had an army a veritable army of attorneys in every state, looking at this exact same thing, and You might recall the guy who was screaming..

Nancy Pelosi Brian Hagedorn Donald Trump Wisconsin Elections Commission Lin Manuel Miranda Wisconsin Election Commission Pelosi five votes 20,000 votes Burlington Trump Wisconsin 100 Robin 109,000 votes Iowa Amazon Dan O Donnell Matt Democrats
"brian hagedorn" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

07:06 min | 2 years ago

"brian hagedorn" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"Is Bill O'Reilly and you will hear the O'Reilly update tomorrow morning A 10 11 and 12 Noon on 8 60 am the answer. Welcome back to the Larry Elder Show. Hello, Larry. I want to address the defensive tone of the Conservative Party, said the selective hearing and complicity GOP. Those see the lived our behavior, uh, just lay on their backs and whine about it. And, uh, I think both teams don't have just defense. People need tol get off their backs and start playing our game. Copulate 971 s a G Triple 89717243 Larry Elder Relief Act calm studio. In that connection. Let me say something about this. Business off the Democrats, the media, referring to people who believe that the election had serious problems, if not was quote, stolen, close quote as quote a big lie close quote. Watching anchors like Jake Tapper. Anderson Cooper. Wolf Blitzer. Probably the three most respected ones. Think even people on the Left. Think of Cuomo and don lemon is clowns. They respect those guys. They respect tapper. They respect Wolf Blitzer. They're flat out, referring to people who believe that the election was stolen as bleeding and a conspiracy theory. A big lie. Driving into work today. I referred. I heard one of them refer to the Buying victory as an overwhelming victory or a massive victory. Something to that effect. Again. I always try and use left wing sources whenever I can to make my point. This is Steve Kornacki. Who's the elections? Numbers cruncher over on Mr Behe Hot that I watched you don't have to. If about 40,000 votes in free states thrashing of appointing each had flipped, Donald Trump could have won the presidency. Okay? So that's what we're talking about. So when everybody tells you about how there's a lopsided margin in the Electoral College, which Donald Trump used to say they used to dismiss it then But now, they say it's a lopsided victory now because Joe Biden has about the same Amount of margin. Whenever you hear anybody say that this was an overwhelming victory, 40,000 precisely have heard 43,001 of the Republican strategists say, but 40,000 votes changes this election. Again used the shoe on the other foot test. Whenever any of these double standard Democrats start going BMW about this out in the other, because there's so much hypocrisy over going back over decades, I've got a file case full of it. If they had lost by 40,000 votes, and there had been affidavit signed by people alleging voter fraud and some official like that Republican official that woman who claimed that their routine voter fraud in places like Detroit and Pontiac and Flint, and they had people like that, and they had mathematician, saying But the likelihood of this occurring it is probability unlikely. Are you kidding me? Let me remind you something else, too. People keep saying Well, every single case has had been has been boarded. That is true. Generally speaking because of procedure issues, like something called latches latched. It means that the Donald Trump team waited too long. That became an issue in the Wisconsin case that would live in litigated all the way up to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, and they ruled 4 to 3. With the unanimous with 43. And following the descent was the chief justice of the Wisconsin spring for it. They said No, he didn't file too late. We should get to the merits of this. Three of them said this The Associated Press referred to it this way. Quote In the 43 ruling, the court's three liberal justices were joined by conservative swing justice Brian Hagedorn, who said Three of Trump's four claims were filed too late, and the other was without merit. What he says. He still should have been allowed to have his case is heard on the merits. Here's what the Wisconsin State Bar said. About the descent. Justice Patrick's Patricia Rogan sack 19 page dissent. Would have reached the merits of the case without regard to the doctrine of latches again. Latches means Donald Trump waited too long before he filed the claim. He should have filed claims earlier about mail in voting concerns, but he waited too long. The chief justice in this dissent, said that With respect to witness requirements, Quote errors in the certification of ballots required this district, discarding those ballots. She said. The Wisconsin law authorizes election officials to return ballots to electorate to fix in any defects. And that the law was ignored. She also talked about how some of the absentee ballots were collected by poll workers at 200 locations in Madison in the A V registration drive dubbed democracy in the park, she said. These may have been invalid because they were not mail delivered in person to the municipal clerk. Quote gatherings in 200 City parks did not meet the statutory requirements for lawful absentee ballot after devoting They also lack the safety and solemnity that are attached to personally delivering absentee ballots to aim initial clerk into quote And another justice wrote a separate descent also joined by others saying that we should have heard this case. So you're talking about 4 to 3 that close and you're also talking about legal minds like Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley, both saying that they felt that the U. S. Supreme Court Should have heard the Pennsylvania case. So 43,000 votes of Fourty three case in Wisconsin, including a dissent signed by the Supreme Court justice that Wisconsin saying We should have heard this case, you have two major legal mind lifting lefties. Both of them are Obama supporting Democrats Jonathan Turley and and Alan Dershowitz, both saying that in their opinion, the The Supreme Court should have held. The Pennsylvania should have heard the Pennsylvania case. So they want to tell you that you're a nut case. They want to tell you that you believe in conspiracy theories when? In fact this was a very, very close election. 40,000 votes one way or the other. We learned that we didn't get what we had in 2016, which was that disconnect between the Electoral College and the popular vote in 16 Trump lost the popular vote won the Electoral college. That was the second time this century that that's happened. There was a lot of talking could happen for the third time it didn't Biden wins. The popular vote wins the electoral college, but it came closer to happening than a lot of people. Realized in on a scale that again would have been off the charts. Look at this. Joe Biden wins the popular vote Phi north of seven million votes. But look at this Wisconsin difference..

Donald Trump Wisconsin Joe Biden Wolf Blitzer Jake Tapper Wisconsin Supreme Court Bill O'Reilly Larry GOP The Supreme Court Conservative Party Anderson Cooper O'Reilly Pennsylvania BMW Alan Dershowitz
Wisconsin Supreme Court rejects Trump's election lawsuit

Mark Belling

00:18 sec | 2 years ago

Wisconsin Supreme Court rejects Trump's election lawsuit

"The Wisconsin Supreme Court today, declining to immediately take up the trump lawsuit over the election irregularities because again not surprisingly, the John Roberts of Wisconsin Brian Hagedorn moved in, joined with the Liberals and voted for three to kick the thing down into Circuit Court meeting. It'll take forever to works of the court so forth and so

Wisconsin Supreme Court Brian Hagedorn John Roberts Wisconsin Liberals Circuit Court