37 Burst results for "Brett Cavenaugh"
Fresh update on "brett kavanaugh" discussed on Bloomberg Radio New York Show
"This is Bloomberg law with June grosso from Bloomberg radio Our voice and rights have been guaranteed in the United States for nearly 50 years onto the landmark ruling of roe V wade But now in the most consequential reproductive rights case in a generation it appears the Supreme Court is ready to roll back abortion rights or perhaps eliminate the constitutional right to abortion altogether During oral arguments this week all 6 conservative justices indicated they would uphold Mississippi's ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy Although the justices appeared to be divided on just how far they would go here at chief justice John Roberts and justices Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh If it really is an issue about choice why is 15 weeks not enough time The fetus has an interest in having a life And that doesn't change does it from the point before viability to the point after viability Why should this court be the arbiter rather than Congress the state legislatures States Supreme courts the people being able to resolve this and they'll be different answers in Mississippi in New York Justice Sonia Sotomayor and the two other liberal justices said that a decision gutting the court's precedent on abortion would undermine the court's legitimacy Will this institution survive the stench that this creates In the public perception that the constitution and its reading are just political acts I don't see how it is possible Joining me is Mary ziegler a professor at Florida state university college of law who specializes in the legal history of reproductive rights Mary what was your take on the arguments The overall impression I got obviously is that Mississippi is going to win And I think it's much more likely that the court has been overturned row outright this summer You know with the usual caveats of things can change between argument and decision What was the main question Was it the viability standard the presidential value of roe Definitely more of the latter than the former for sure I mean there's a lot of time spent on The presidential value of row and whether the constitution is silent or a strict Kavanaugh put it through neutral and about abortion right There was much less time spent on viability although she's just miss John Roberts certainly focused on my ability and Amy Coney Barrett at some point showed some interest in that line of questioning as well But the majority of the questions focused on whether row was the kind of precedent that deserve respect The chief justice is an incrementalist He likes to change law little by little Was he looking for a middle ground that none of the conservatives took him up on I think that's a fair reading of it although I think the only person who considered taking him up on it is just the spirit I think she's probably going to be at least based on the argument that the person whose vote is the most up for grabs In the case I mean obviously getting rid of viability would be a major change to abortion doctrine So while I think it's right to frame Robert as an incrementalist and framed data search for middle ground solution I think it's also worth qualifying that this is not usually what passes for a compromised But I think that's what he was trying to do And I think that with maybe the exception of justice spare there were no takers Was the only question for conservatives whether to overrule row entirely or whether to stop at 15 weeks in the Mississippi law Was there any inkling of support for maintaining the current rule and precedent No I mean not really I don't think that any of the conservatives came interested in that How did we come this far this fast Because just a few years ago it seemed like roe was on pretty solid ground It's obviously quite sudden I mean I think justice Sotomayor although people who are anti abortion are probably like the tone of her question had a point in saying you know legislators have been seeing essentially we can do whatever we want when it comes to abortion because we have the votes And it does seem to have changed quite rapidly that we've gone from June medical not even two years ago to an oral argument where the court seems ready to throw out the whole kitten caboodle So I think there's no other way to explain it other than the first membership changing Nothing else has been that transformed in the time between June of 2020 and the winter of 2021 Did it seem as if there were three camps justices clarence Thomas Samuel lito and Neil gores at your ready to overturn roe And then on the other side you have the liberal justices Stephen breyers Sonia Sotomayor Elena Kagan who want to preserve roe obviously And then this other group of chief justice John Roberts Britt Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett where I'm not sure where they were Does the decision depend on those three Absolutely I mean based on the argument I'm not sure I would lay out the configuration that way That was the configuration going in If just based on the argument if you knew nothing else at the argument you would say that there were four justices ready to overall role right now And you would include Brett Kavanaugh alongside clarence Thomas Samuel Alito in the abortion and put John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett in the middle with Barrett I think leaning more towards the cabinet at all camps And Robert certainly sort of standing on his own in this kind of viability strategy that he laid out But I think the votes were watching probably most closely will be just as fair as both So even if the court doesn't explicitly overturn roe what a decision upholding Mississippi's law will have a far reaching impact Totally I mean we would expect to see states interpreting this as a green light to move forward with actually banned We would expect to see circuit courts agreeing with that assessment and allowing more abortion bans to stand And we would expect to see the court move toward reversing row entirely not long thereafter And I think you might even see face with trigger laws which go into effect when row is gone arguing that roe had been overturned and that their trigger laws for bands could go into effect To sum up what's the likely decision here in your mind Most likely thing I think based on oral arguments is the court is going to say that there's no constitutional right to abortion in the space you're going to be able to have an abortion So that means an overturning of roe Yes I think that's the most likely thing You think that would be a 6 three vote That's an interesting question If they're going to overall row I think Roberts may go along with it because she would want the court to look united I think he would think it would be worse to have a 5 four decision overturning row but I don't know I mean would either be 6 three or 5 four If the court overturns roe what would be the next step Could we see a time where abortion is declared unconstitutional Yeah it's on the table I mean anti abortion groups are already asking for it So for example there are amicus briefs in this case arguing that an unborn child is a rights holding person and asking the court to hold the divorce is unconstitutional That doesn't seem likely in the short term In part of course because Kavanaugh seemed to try to foreclose that possibility His argument that the constitution was neutral So at the moment it seems that there would not be.
Fresh update on "brett kavanaugh" discussed on Stephanie Miller
"Less than a month after Texas 6 week abortion ban went into effect governor Greg Abbott quietly signed another anti choice Bill that restricts access to medication abortion On Thursday that restriction became law largely cutting off what little access Texans had left to abortion care The new law restricts abortion medication by prohibiting doctors from describing the abortion bill after 7 weeks of pregnancies Three weeks less than the U.S. FDA's limit of ten weeks the law also makes it a felony for physicians to send abortion bills to a patient by courier delivery or mail specifically requiring physicians to do an in person examination I mean this is the thing they get out ahead of us They think of everything in terms of taking away our rights We got to get out ahead of them out of protection We've needed to go on offense for a really long time Let's do it with a second ahead of the hurry up and die caucus yesterday's life Get the guns Let's go Let's whirl that team together Yeah if they're playing that dirty we're gonna play that dirty too So dodie it's about keeping our kids alive in school Well regulated militia Narrow the definition I mean and again over 90% overturn the Supreme Court precedent that said that the second amount talks about all guns because it doesn't It only talks about serving a well regulated militia on abortion to do it And just like roe V wade it's huge hugely popular and some will gun reform Yep Brett Kavanaugh said two days ago that precedent can be overturned and he gave a laundry list of president that has been overturned All this stupid Second Amendment precedent Let's do it Ron and Texas you're on the Stephanie Miller show hey Ron welcome Hi Go ahead Did you get a little tired of all of the negativity these days Yes Well I am from zed happy I.
Sir William Blackstone's Case for Self-Defense Holds True Nearly 300 Years Later
"William Blackstone from 1723 to 1780 said the following. Self defense is justly called the primary law of nature. So it is not neither can it be, in fact, ever taken away by the laws of society. William Blackstone, the architect of the western justice system. Said that self defense is justly called the primary law of nature. Think about the significance of what he's saying there. But if you're not able to defend yourself against an aggressor, then you are violating at the core, the social contract of your existence in the laws of nature and nature's God. Now Blackstone meant this both for people like Kyle rittenhouse and Brett Kavanaugh. You see black stone was not just saying that you should be able to defend yourself against the child rapist who wants to kill you, like Kyle rittenhouse, but also against people like Christine balls a Ford, who decide to come out and say, you know. I think you did something bad to me. And Brett Kavanaugh's should be able to say, that's not true. Blackstone understood that an aggressor going after an innocent that the innocent has a moral and biblical obligation to defend oneself. And that's really what's on trial here, isn't it? It's not just that Kyle rittenhouse, according to the activist media, should not have been able to defend himself in the street. It's not that just Kyle rittenhouse should not be able to defend himself against rosenbaum or whatever that freakazoid is. No, no, no. It's that Kyle rittenhouse should not even be able to defend himself in court.
Supreme Court questions controversial Texas abortion law
"Supreme Court justices are signaling that they may allow a court challenge to a Texas law that is virtually ended abortion in the nation's second largest state the Supreme Court heard three hours of arguments in two cases whole women's health versus Jackson and United States versus Texas over whether abortion providers or the justice department can mount federal court challenges to the new Texas abortion law Solicitor General Elizabeth Taylor gar Texas designed SP eight to thwart the primacy of federal law in open defiance of our constitutional structure Jody stone the second arguing for Texas said the abortion providers can't sue state judges and clerks and that the justice department had no standing conservative justice Brett Kavanaugh raised questions about the laws novel structure deputising private citizens to sue abortion providers there's a loophole that's been exploited here justice Elena Kagan suggested that ruling in favor of the providers would allow the court to avoid difficult issues of federal power its purpose and its effect is
Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh Tests Positive for Covid-19
"Supreme court justice. Brett cavanaugh has tested positive for cove in nineteen his no symptoms. He feels fine. He's been fully vaccinated since january. Supreme court justices had a routine corona virus test ahead of a friday ceremony involving justice. Amy coney barrett the court says kavanagh's wife and daughters are also fully vaccinated. They tested negative. Yesterday this is going to be our world. It's all right. He's going to be fine. And i think we do have to be a little bit careful. We got to be a little bit careful of overreacting to positive test.
Justice Kavanaugh tests positive for COVID, has no symptoms
"Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh has tested positive for coal bit nineteen the High Court says in a release state capital has no symptoms and has been fully vaccinated since January all the justices had routine corona virus tests ahead of today's ceremonial investiture for judge Amy Coney Barrett cabin on his wife will not attend the ceremony Kavanagh's wife and daughters also our fully vaccinated and tested negative the justices are returning to the court room to hear arguments after an eighteen month absence because of the corona virus pandemic the court's new term begins Monday my camp in Washington
Biden Court Pick Says Brett Kavanaugh Is ‘Morally Bankrupt’
"Welcome back america. I'm hugh hewitt. Thank you for joining me. On this thursday morning senator. Tom cotton from arkansas. Is my guest. Good morning senator. Thank you for joining me. Good morning to you. It's good to be on with you as always. I've got a lot of things to covering begin. Perhaps counter intuitively with your on the senate judiciary committee. I played part of your questioning of the nominee jennifer sung the night circuit. I would not vote to confirm anyone who signs such a letter. Will you know of course not huge. Jennifer song is a far left lawyer who signed a letter the day after brett cabinet. I was nominated. I think she called him intellectually and morally bankrupt and predicted that people will die if he's confirmed Look i'm saying disagreeing with kavanagh's rulings. When he was a judge now justice. I disagreed with the here and there as well Disagreed much. every justice's rulings here and there. So i'm a lot more than others. Obviously but i'm not aware why you probably morally bankrupt and it is sung obviously couldn't predict the person or the person who has died in the last three years we vertibrak break capping off to the court. I gotta say no. That's just the tip of the iceberg. The by the ministration has nominated dozens. Maybe hundreds of people whose twitter feed. Show them to be totally unhinged. I i mean they really went off the deep end in the trump or some people that i genuinely respected from the obama era. Maybe i didn't agree with them all the time. But i thought especially in the world of national security. They were responsible sensible sober-minded professionals even if we had our disagreements here and there about say how to confront isis or What our policy iraq was. And then you look at me. Twitter speeds. When i come back in front of us to be confirmed this time around. And they sound like crazy people ranting in the
Federal Judge Leaves CDC Evictions Moratorium in Place
"A federal judge's leaving the by the administration's new eviction moratorium in place district judge Dabney Friedrich says the ban imposed last week is substantially similar to one she's already ruled is illegal but Friedrich says her hands are tied by a ruling from the appeals court above her she's refusing a request by Alabama landlords to put the ban on hold in a case that could end up before the Supreme Court the High Court refused in June to let the vixens resume but justice Brett Kavanaugh had said he would reject any more extensions unless Congress acts which it has not president Biden's acknowledge questions about the ban's legality but says a court fight would buy time for states to distribute billions in a rental eight Sager mag ani Washington
High court sides with ex-athletes in NCAA compensation case
"The Supreme Court decided unanimously the NC double a cannot enforce rules limiting education related benefits that colleges offer to student athletes the case doesn't decide whether students can be paid salaries but justice Brett Kavanaugh argued the issue of compensating athletes could fall under anti trust laws that management the schools may be exploiting labor the student athlete Gabe Feldman is a law professor at Tulane University it's only a matter of time before another lawsuit was filed that asked for the whole system to be blown up NC double a president mark Emmert is not ready to move to pay college athletes the ruling goes to great lengths to point out that that authority still resides within the association's purview the NC double a argued that a ruling for the athletes could lead to a blurring of the line between college and professional sports at Donahue Washington
Supreme Court Strikes Down Part of ‘Amateurism’ Rules by NCAA
"Unanimously today that the went too far in blocking some education related aid for student athletes. Decision that comes as college athletic struggles with the issue of how to preserve its amateur status. The court said that the violated antitrust laws when it limited the amount students could receive for musical instruments, scientific equipment, postgraduate scholarships, tutoring Academic awards and paid internships. Writing for the court Justice Neil Gorsuch said U. S District Judge Claudia Wilken was correct in dismissing the organization's argument that antitrust law doesn't apply. Her decision, he said, was based on quote an exhausted factual record, a thoughtful legal analysis consistent with established antitrust principles and a healthy dose of judicial humility, Close quote. In a concurring opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said that the Ah and its member colleagues are quote suppressing the pay of student athletes who collectively generate billions of dollars in revenues for colleges every year. Those enormous sums of money flow to seemingly everyone except the student athlete, close quote.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on WTMJ 620
"You have Brett Kavanaugh? You have any Coney Barrett? That were in the majority. We know which way they lead. Well, not maybe not Robert Scott, considering what he did in the past, Okay, you know the point. You win some, You lose some 85561616 20 on the accident, Mortgage talk and text Ling. Is it time? For Challenges to Obamacare, as it is established right now is a time for those challengers to realize. The fight is over. 85561616 20, or are you going? Hell? No. Scott, Are you kidding me? This is a fight that we must continue to wage. These are challenges that we must continue to bring up in the lower courts. And if it means we got to go all the way right back up to the U. S Supreme Court again. We will Or is this the death now? Is this it? 85561616 20 accurate mortgage talking text line. I imagine for some people, that's a really difficult Realization take to to to come to this morning. Because of how striking so many have been in the Repeal and replace In the strike the whole thing down argument for a decade. This is a battle. That citizens. Organizations, obviously elected officials, politicians have been fighting for 10 years. And yet, as we sit here in June of 2021 Obamacare was signed into law. In what March of 2010 I believe It's still here. And it has again survived a challenge in the Supreme Court that Would say leans conservative, right? And yet you have these conservative justices that said in this case, and that's all they're doing. They rule on this case. In this instance for this reason They chose to uphold it. 85561616 20. You don't have to be. Let me just say this because the obamacare can be kind of a medicine topic and Is it Time to give up? Is it over? Is it over the legislation as we know it has been Established for a decade. Is it time to move on? I say it is. It's over. What's done is done. That doesn't mean you can't challenge potential changes to the law. That means you can't go about doing it legislatively. But in terms of Court challenges. Is it over? Should it be over? Is it time for? Let's be honest Republicans challenging Obamacare to move on Lost that one. What's the next fight that we're going to try and win? Because this one it's been 11 years and it's not going our way. Tell me, I'm wrong. Tell me, I'm crazy. That's fine. 85561616 20, the ACC unit Mortgage talking text line 855. 61616 20 as we continue more of the Steve.
Senator claims FBI's Kavanaugh investigation may have been "fake"
"House of Rhode Island has a new request for Attorney General Merrick Garland and new letter Tonight he wants the attorney general to look into the FBI investigation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh back in 2018 before Cavanaugh was confirmed to serve on the high court. This is a circus. I will not be intimidated into withdrawing from this process during the confirmation process cabin all fought back against sexual assault allegations dating back decades. The FBI investigated those claims, but wrote Island, Senator Sheldon White House wants newly confirmed Attorney General Merrick Garland to take a second look into the FBI's probe. In a letter White House writes, it appeared to have been a politically constrained and perhaps fake FBI investigation into alleged misconduct by Kavanaugh. The senator says the bureau wasn't willing to accept testimony from some witnesses calling that unique behavior in a statement to WBC news radio, the FBI would not common. Laurie, curvy
Senator claims FBI's Kavanaugh investigation may have been "fake"
"Our island Standard or Sheldon White House is asking Attorney General Merrick Garland to look into the 2018 FBI investigation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. He was accused of sexually assaulting Dr Christine Blasi, Ford In a letter Senator White House says it appeared to have any politically constrained and perhaps fake FBI investigation into alleged misconduct by Kavanaugh. The senator says the girl wasn't willing to accept testimony from some witnesses. Writes. This was unique behavior as the bureau usually is a minimally says to information and evidence, But in this case, he said, the shutters were closed. The FBI did not provide comment on the allegations. We have also reached out to the Department of Justice, but so far have not heard
High court seems likely to leave to health care law in place
"Another Republican bid to strike down the entire affordable Care Act appears likely to fail again in the supreme court's third big case on the law known as obamacare Republicans argued the court should find the laws mandate for obtaining health insurance unconstitutional and wipe out the whole thing to conservative justices were among those appearing unwilling with Chief Justice John Roberts noting Congress zeroed out the penalty for failing to obtain health care Congress left the rest of the law intact trump appointee Brett Kavanaugh says recent court decisions suggest the proper remedy is to cut out the mandate and leave the rest of the act in place a move the courts three liberal justices would presumably join Sager mag ani Washington
Collins Wins in Maine, Denying Democrats a Crucial Senate Pickup
"Watched Senate race only sobriety Fox News Republican Susan Collins of Maine claiming victory moments ago as her Democratic challenger Sara Gideon concedes and the Fox News decision Desk, just officially calling that Senate race for Collins. Noting that it significantly improves Republican chances of keeping control of the Senate that race not as close In the end of some expected Collins ahead by more than eight points. I am the first person Since main directly elected it's senators TTO win of fifth term She has been known for opposing President Trump at times. But standing alongside Republicans were some crucial votes, including the confirmation of Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh. She opposed last month's vote on Justice Amy Cockney Barrett. Though coming so close to the election, President Trump is
'Dude, I'm Done': When Politics Tears Families And Friendships Apart
"Now you have likely seen it or felt it yourself. Now A recent survey shows how the nation's bitter political divide is taking a toll on friendships as NPR's Tuvia Smith reports with political polarization hitting a fever pitch. Even decades long relationships are caving under the pressure. It's been happening everywhere on social media, and in really life did straight up there. Dude, I'm done Lose my number that Shimada Davis from L. A. I just hung up on my end, and I proceeded to just block them in every possible way. Joanie Jensen from New York. I hate families, everything but I just don't know and Ricardo de Forest from Florida, there among the many Americans dumping friends over politics. It's one thing to disagree about tax policy, says Davis. But this is deeper. It's about morality and justice. As a black man. He says he simply could not abide his friend of 25 years down playing police brutality. It's like if this is your attitude. I don't respect you. Now I don't because people are really dying. It's also that kind of moral absolute to Jensen, retired professor and sexual assault survivor who cut off a friend of 40 years who was being cavalier about the allegations against Trump's then Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. He was going off flight. Oh, you drank the Kool Aid Cabin on boy. He didn't do anything. I said if this is his core ethics, I don't want that kind of person in my life Conservatives, Of course. Khun B. Justus, quick to spurn the liberals in their lives who clashed with their core values like life or the biggie for Ricardo de Forest Liberty. They sold our country out. This election is about the soul of what America is. He can be a free country. Andy, a socialist state to forest, a 61 year old steelworker cut off several cousins who he calls hard core Trump haters all they can do it. From the races on man bed on man raises, you know, blowing spittle in and veins popping out of their heads Yolk soy Latino, But I guess I'm some sort of horrible races because I like Trump. Ridiculous. We are seeing more political polarization today than at any point in modern history. Jocelyn Kiley, with the Pew Research Center says about 80% of Americans now have few or no friends across the aisle, and the animosity goes both ways. Democrats are a little bit more likely to say they'd end a friendship. But Republicans, maybe a little bit less likely to say they have friends on the other side, so it may not be all that differential. Everybody is doing this Tania Israel The University of California psychology professor runs workshops on cross the aisle conversations, she says. Both sides have big blind spots when it comes to the morality of their own side, and they all view themselves as eminently fair. And right. When I say all these things, I think I found fairly reasonable and see the other side as irrational. Just something wrong with these people. Whether conservatives like the forest or lefties like Joni Jensen, I said, Oh, my God, he really is brain. Wass. Everyone Tanya, Israel says could use a little more intellectual humility were flattening people out, you know, in terms of our view of them and not really seeing the full complexity of people on the other side. It's exactly what Georgia truck driver Jon Langford says his brother who's gay did to him. He went off on the sand. Essentially, I'm a racist and a homophobe. Just because I'm a trump supporter, knowif stands or butts. Ain't completely cut me out of his life, Langford says he's trying to not do the same and toe hang onto his friends. On the other side. I could assume that anybody that supports Biden is a firm believer that it's okay to murder a baby, but I don't From the other end of the political spectrum. Connecticut business consultant Jeff Maren Steen is also straining to stay friends with some trump supporters. Despite all the invective and insults, you know you live They're all the same or these ad hominem attacks. Maren Steen no longer talks to some of them with others. He just doesn't talk politics. It just feels like the healthiest thing for me to do at the moment. But, you know, I suppose the risk is that I'm just retreating into my own information bubble with people who think just like me. Indeed, experts say more conversation, not less is what's needed to heal the
Murkowski to vote to confirm Barrett to the Supreme Court
"Alaska Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski says she's going to vote for Judge Amy Cockney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court vacancy during a rare weekend session. Markowski said she had no doubt Barrett could do the job and that is the sort of person we want on the Supreme Court Majority leader Mitch McConnell agrees. We've watched her and committee he's demonstrated she has the deep legal expertise, dispassionate judicial temperament and sheer intellectual horsepower. That the American people deserve to have on their Supreme Court. With Murkowski onboard. Senators haven't even stronger majority and getting Barrett confirmed on Monday. Murkowski was the only Republican senator to not vote for Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation and
Judiciary Committee sets date for vote on Barrett confirmation
"This morning, Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee tried and failed to slow down the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Amy Cockney Barrett, who appears to be on track for the high court before the November 3rd election. NPR congressional reporter Claudia Gonzalez joins us with the latest and Claudia Today is Day four of Cockney barrettes confirmation How far apart of Republicans and Democrats on this committee over the sheer pace of this confirmation hearing? It's really going pretty fast. They're moving as quickly as they can. Republicans. Are they? Both sides remain very far apart. Just this morning is you had mentioned Democrats were able to delay today's proceedings. They did that by about two hours. And they're hearing now from a series of experts and Barrett is not appearing s. Oh, it's just a reminder of how these two sides are so opposed right now. Democrats don't want to see this nomination move forward, but they also have very limited tools and their disposal to stop this process. Republicans have been steadfast in their mission to approve Barrett to the court before Election Day, and even this much of the country is already in the midst of early voting. So this is moving on schedule for Republicans, even with the Democrats attempts to stall with a vote set for next Thursday to move her nomination from the committee to the full Senate floor. What's been some of the analysis of how Cockney Barrett has has come across this week, while surprisingly, even with this bitter partisanship on display right now, this hasn't been this combative and contentious as we saw during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings from 2018. Democratic senators told reporters last night that Barrett isn't his combative as Kavanaugh. So that's taken Ah lot of the heat out of this wave of hearings this time that say they've complained repeatedly that Barrett has been evasive. She's declined to talk about how she might rule in the future on certain cases. And she's also dodged questions on climate change and other matters that air of importance right now, But in light of that, Republicans say Barrett and her background is still resonating with the American public. She did have some things to say, though, about the case coming before the high court this week after the election, challenging the affordable care act, what stood out there? So she hasn't said she'll recuse herself. From that case, she was grilled extensively on this. Democrats say Trump is putting her on the court to overturn it. And Democrats say Barrett auditioned for the court threw a Siri's of critical pieces against the we should note. Again that this case will be before the court just a week after the election, and she hasn't said this week, however, that she's on a mission to destroy it, but still, it remains unclear how she could rule here. And says she hasn't looked at the issues yet and doesn't know how she will either. There was also this moment yesterday in an exchange with Senator and Democratic vice presidential candidate Kamala Harris, who pressed Cockney Barrett on her beliefs about whether Koven 19 was infectious. Whether smoking causes cancer. And whether climate change is real. I will not expressive you on a matter of public policy, especially when that is politically controversial because that's inconsistent with the judicial role as I have, explained Barrett and you've made your point clear that you believe that's a debatable plan. And in Harris was responding there on noting that Cockney Barrett is saying climate change is a debatable point. What are other Democrats saying about moments like this? And what are Republicans, also saying in response, Democrats are using this as ammunition that Baird has been evasive and using. This is an example of claims that the American public still doesn't know. Bear it well enough to know she's a right fit for the Supreme Court in this ties into another concern, just raised by Democrats in today's hearing. Claiming Barrett has yet to submit comprehensive information of the committee about her background because again, this is such a rushed process on. Even Democrats have conceded they haven't had enough time to dig in to bat. Barrett's background to bring some And even more comprehensive look at this nominee and how she could shift the court. So in terms of her asking thes questions that Paris and others if they feel like they're haven't been enough answers, But Republicans say that she's presented a complete picture enough to be approved to the to the highest court. Okay, So what's the timeline for the committee to vote on her nomination and then the full Senate? So we know to Republican Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. R potential. No votes, but But even still, is this a done deal? This appears to be a done deal from here. Of course, a week is eons away these days, so we can't say for sure what's going to happen. However, the committee has set that vote for next week to vote her nomination out to the full Senate floor so the full Senate could take this up sometime in the remaining days of the month. And in terms of who might vote against that, Yes, those two Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska are two potential no votes. Democrats are still hoping that they'll have more Republicans flip and vote against this and perhaps derail the effort. But right now it looks like this could be a done deal.
Amy Coney Barrett: Talented judge, popular professor brings solid conservative credentials
"President Trump named Judge Amy Cockney Barrett as Ginsberg's replacement, CBS News Legal analyst Jonathan Turley on her background Judge Barrett is in some ways a conservative version of Ruth Bader Ginsberg both graduated at the top of their respective law. School classes. Both went into teaching. Both started to write in the areas of procreation, a ll rights and Constitutional interpretation. Both were deeply religious. But most importantly like a Ginsburg judge, Barrett would come to the cord with a clearly articulated judicial philosophy. CBS has been Tracy with more. He's very highly respected, I could bear it is a favorite of religious conservatives for her strong anti abortion rights views, and, if confirmed, would move the court to the right for a generation. In 2016, she said. She doesn't think Roe v. Wade will be entirely overturned, but access to abortion would be restricted. I don't think that core case that rose core holding that women have a right to an abortion. I don't think that would change, but I think the question off Whether people can get very late term abortions. You know how many restrictions could be put on clinics? I think that would change. President. Trump first considered Barrett when filling Justice Anthony Kennedy seat After he retired in 2018, he nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh instead. That meant Barrett was already vetted by the White House that CBS has been Tracy. The
NPR News Interviews Professor Anita Hill
"Considered from NPR News. I'm Ari Shapiro and Mary Louise Kelly has enough changed in the three years since the Harvey Weinstein story broke and the me to movement took off. A new report finds that for Hollywood and the entertainment business, the answer is no. The Hollywood Commission, a nonprofit that works to eradicate harassment and discrimination in the industry. Surveyed entertainment workers nationwide and found many are staying silent because they fear retaliation. Or they don't believe people in positions of power will be held to account. The chair of the commission is Anita Hill, who, of course, has fought her own battles over getting allegations of sexual harassment taken seriously. She accused now Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas of harassment and testified. Under oath back in 1991. Professor Hill joins us now welcome back to all things considered. I'm glad to speak with you again. I'm happy to be here. Tell me what surprised you in the survey results Well, the standout data was the data on accountability. We ask people Do you think that a person of higher rank Who was found to have our asked a person of lower rank would be held accountable and what we found is that 64% of the people we surveyed said that in fact, that person would not be held accountable. I suppose that's the thing that surprised me. I mean, on the one hand, it's not surprising that we're dealing with such deeply entrenched culture and history here. On the other hand, it's been three years of me, too, in the spotlight, and many powerful men have been held to account. You're you're absolutely right. We've seen some very high profile cases. And what we want to make sure is that it doesn't stop with just a few high profile cases. We know that they are problems throughout. Workplaces, and we want to make sure that everybody, whatever their position is Can count on being heard. So that's one piece of this. The other is persuading people who believe they're being harassed, have been harassed that they have a safe path to come forward and report it. I remember interviewing you, Professor Hill. Always. Almost exactly. Two years ago, September 2018 on we were talking because it was in the middle of the confirmation battle over Brett Kavanaugh. And we talked about the the personal cost of choosing to come forward. What do you say to someone who's weighing whether to do so or not? Well, you're absolutely right. There are personal cost. But even when people are willing to take the risk, there are other things that they're considering. People don't come forward because they think they won't be taken seriously. Unfortunately, the Cavanagh hearing really gave the impression that the Senate Judiciary Committee Did not take Christine Bozzi. Ford's claim seriously, and people see that example and becomes, you know what they think will happen to them.
Trump Expected To Nominate Amy Coney Barrett To The Supreme Court
"Sources tell Fox News that Judge Amy Cockney Barrett is President Trump's pick to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who passed away last week and announcement is expected at 5 P.m. Eastern. After that, senators on both sides will prepare for a contentious confirmation process. This is going to be like the Brett Kavanaugh process on steroids. Republicans were willing to forge ahead once it was clear that they had at least 51 votes to do this. And the Senate Majority leader, Mitch McConnell is already criticizing Democrats for having made up their minds every single time, Madam president, no matter how upstanding no matter how qualified no matter their views, no matter their record, every nominee gets the same insane treatment. So long as the president who nominated them is not a Democrat, the Senate confirmed. Amy Cockney Barrett in 2017 for the seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Fox's Chad program. Democrats call the confirmation effort a Republican power grab since the election is just 38 days away this as the Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden keeps his list of potential Supreme Court contenders under wraps. Biden's justification for refusing to name his Supreme Court list ahead of the election. He says it could subject a candidate to personal attacks. Judges on his leads to Mayfield influence in writing their opinions boxes, which Edson
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO
"Independent thoughts independent life this is Chad Benson there is going to be an election issue it will be trump versus most likely Biden but you never know you never never right right a little bit longer she guy named Brett Kavanaugh and Christine glossy Ford member her so there's an allegation against him happens some forty years earlier by a woman who really couldn't recall exactly what took place at the house that it took place at it was at best throw against the wall I felt bad for her because I felt like the Democrats used during the minute they were done whether they threw away and I don't discount anything that that happened but it was at but there's no court in the land that would convict him on any of this but at the time it was you gotta believe all women and I said now you have to hear all women you don't believe everything you have to hear it you don't say I believe you before you've even heard Joe Biden for the last several weeks this has been a public coronavirus has stolen everything standard let's be real every things thunder has been stolen by said coronavirus that's twenty four seven nonstop but politics still going on it's not going anywhere there will be an election in November and Joe Biden whose let's be real bit handsy we already know that Virat has never we already know that has heard the rumblings of this and the media is largely ignored it when they have talked to him it's been you know basically get the best of the greatest can you defeat this evil monster in the White House I don't know if the allegations are true right I don't know everybody you know trump's chiming in about what's going on your campaign surrogates going after him pretty hard with regard these allegations from terror Reid what do you say to I don't know anything about it I I don't know exactly I think you should respond you know so it could be false accusations like know about false accusations had been falsely charged numerous times and that there is such a thing they could make I don't know if what she's saying is true because we haven't heard the story the media is largely ignored the story which is very hypocritical of them based on what took place Kevin Cavanaugh there's an outstanding man he was falsely charged what happened with him was an absolute disgrace to our country and I guess three of the four women have now admitted that and of the force give me a break but I don't know I can't speak for but I can only say that I think you should respond I think you should answer them the other day he was at a women's foreign nobody asked the question so you have a woman sorry who in nineteen ninety three accused him of doing something she told her brother she told her next door neighbor there has been more than a few people the so yeah yeah yeah she told me exactly what happened and and and who it was so today finally because I think enough people said you've got to address this because the Huffington post is starting to ask questions pretty left leaning Hayes the other night started asking questions don lemon has asked some questions as well because that's what you're supposed to do in this kind of situation I'm not saying you did anything because I don't know I wasn't there she could be the lighting she could be telling the truth please tell our viewers please excuse the graphic nature of this but I want to make sure that there is no question as to what we're talking about she says in nineteen ninety three Mr vice president at U. Pendergast the wall and reached under her closing and penetrated her with your fingers would you please go on the record with the American people did you sexually assault Tara Reid no it is not true I'm saying unequivocally it never never happened it never happened okay never happened never never never ever ever ever ever happened that's what he sent in a quickly we live in a world where innocent until proven guilty I don't know if it happened or not I don't they're gonna be other women that pop up it's a possibility he wasn't finished when we are to be believed given the benefit of the doubt if they come forward and say something that isn't that they said happened to them the start of the presumption of telling the truth then you have to look at the circumstances and the facts and the facts in this case do not exist they never happened and.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM
"Benson there is going to be an election issue it will be trump versus most likely Biden but you never know you never never now thank you back two summers ago right right a little bit longer a guy named Brett Kavanaugh and Christine glossy Ford member her home show there's an allegation against him happens some forty years earlier by a woman who really couldn't recall exactly what took place at the house that it took place at it was at best a throw against the wall I felt bad for her because I felt like the Democrats used during the minute they were done whether they threw away and I do want to discount anything that that happened but it was at that there's no court in the land would convict him on any of this but at the time it was you gotta believe all women and I said now you have to hear all women you don't believe everything you have to hear it you don't say I believe you before you've even heard Joe Biden for the last several weeks this has been bubbling.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"Knew as soon as we heard about this we've talked about this for a bit they were trying drag the present United States into this which they have and I want to get into that in a minute but the peril is not with the president the United States the parallels the media have done to people like Brett Kavanaugh not the present United States the present United States has never been accused of rape and what you heard there is disgusting as it is they called sexual assault no that's rape in most states it's rape you don't have to have actual intercourse for somebody who's been raped now let's continue with this what number my own Mister producer let's go a cut nine go the criticism by some particularly on the right now this is no this is intended for us go ahead the same standard to this allegation against fighting as it did against judge Brett Kavanaugh when he was undergoing his confirmation process we think that's a good thing the media should not apply would seem to be a cap on all standard to Joe Biden the media should not apply the same standard most applied to judge Kavanaugh to Donald Trump the media should not apply it's having a standard to any public figure from Blanchard and absolute standard of simply believing all women is the notion we dismiss here on the show early on the standard for the media in covering sexual assault allegations needs to be to report the facts listen to the accuser and give the accused full due process and and women's very clear about that on the show during the cabinet installations where her deceit is a marquee on this program and this is an old trick the people playing TV and radio they will show you cherry picked examples of where they made rational statements they will not show you the examples when they went over the cliff MSNBC in this program the morning schmo went over the cliff thirdly every show did virtually everybody on TV on MSNBC and CNN did it was a mob it was a mob mentality they were going after this man and nobody but nobody remembers Joe Scarborough Mika Brzezinski standing up for due process and justice nobody does so they say just enough and then they put together the little montage C. nobody should be treated the way Brett Kavanaugh did really so what she's doing here she showing yourself to be a choir is a tough question but then she's saying just follow the facts and don't treat him like everybody was treating Brett Kavanaugh now the defending or or outraged at the way he was treated I'll be right back then.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"Sorry I'm sorry I was I was going to go my god on the dance to polo C. at one point had attacked Brett Kavanaugh for send his nomination to the United States Senate and he referred to people like Christine Lahti for his courageous women quote risking her safety well and and her well being to speak the truth about this nomination and she said that by nominating and and eventually confirming Cavanaugh this quote center Republicans chose to send a clear message to all women do not speak out if you do do not expect to be heard believe or respected she said at the time now yesterday morning she was on CNN she was being questioned by the host there Allison Cammarata and about Joe Biden the allegations against him here is how she answered questions in the morning remember Joe Biden up until this point even up until this very hour has not yet answered questions at all about Tara Reid's allegation against him listen to this conversation like Asian that is being made by one of his former Senate staffers do you think that it is time for vice president Biden to address this head on himself well I if I have great sympathy for any women who bring forth an allegation on the big strong supporter of the me too movement I I think it's been a great a great contribution to our country and it's in and I do support Joe Biden I'm satisfied with how he has responded I know him I was proud to endorse him the other day on Monday very proud to endorse and and so on I'm satisfied with that I mean he hasn't to be clear he hasn't addressed has rested but he has not directly he directly publicly addressed it you know it's a matter that he has to deal with but I can't pressed with the people who work for him at the time saying that ever absolutely never heard one iota of it information about this nobody ever brought forth a couple of claim or had anybody else tell them about such a claim about again the an important election at hand one that is I think one of the most important ones that would have extended every election but I think this one is the most crucial and I I supported him because he's a person of great values integrity authenticity imagination and a connection to the American people eight hundred stands a kitchen table issues of America's working families his father lost his job when he was a boy okay block a lot look here's the thing she is telling us and that did she better hope that that in the end it's true that there is no complaint about Joe Biden from the nineties because Tara Reid says there definitely was one yeah and if it exists it could very well exist in the records in the university of Delaware from that time in the Senate that Joe Biden is refusing to release as of this moment right so so we're never gonna know so it's very easy for Nancy Pelosi to say you know caught no there was no there was no complaint because we'll never know and they know that we'll never know you know I can find out whether she knows whether she's lying and after Joe Biden leaves public life again they can be released two years after that and they don't care the long be gone they'll all be out of politics long gone don't care if they live so our friend Keri Pickett had an opportunity to teach to question a Nancy Pelosi yesterday as well she's reporter for the Washington examiner nothing offensive in any way or even suggestively partisan inet in Kerry's question it was a perfectly good question Nancy Pelosi flies off the handle anyway.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on KTTH 770AM
"You believed Brett Kavanaugh's accusers you have no evidence against him this woman at least has a decent amount of contemporaneously evidence against you should she not be believed and if not why not tell these very difficult questions were put to Joe Biden have a listen to his response I don't wanna make too much light of this because it actually makes me angry but the crickets choke it's just a way of illustrating not only has Joe Biden said nothing about this allegation for which new evidence has continued to emerge he hasn't been asked directly about it still still he's running for president to put out there for a month it is inconceivable that someone on the other side of the spectrum would be treated this way by the press completely inconceivable The New York Times finally wrote like three weeks after the original complaint came out in the allegation came out publicly they finally wrote a piece they softened it up in the air brushed it in terms of their verbiage because the Biden campaign pressure them to do it and they did they changed it and they presented that pieces sort of their comprehensive look at the allegation against Biden G. you know it's really not that much there what wasn't that comprehensive because we've had multiple people come out since fortifying the claim that the new York times didn't find didn't on earth think about all the journalists that were deployed to on cannot for even deployed up to was still Alaska to dig through the library that Serra Pailin you may have attended when he was mayor some stories are just of more interest to the mainstream media I can understand the absolute partisan hack free of Democrats that's to be expected but right now the media is acting not as loose allies in the Democratic Party but as the praetorian guard as the defenders shielding the lead Democrat from a very uncomfortable story and that is the opposite of the mission statement of journalism at some point I think this whole disgraceful episode is going to be unsustainable and untenable and the question is when the questions finally start to get asked of Joe Biden what on earth is he gonna say given his own standard his own words that we just played you stay tuned well see it's gonna happen eventually it's insane that it's already taken this long and the clock is still ticking we'll break and come back if the guy doesn't show three three four five six thirteen hundred you're listening to in so for ninety five years saya LTL freight to deliver the goods key businesses and communities moving now in this uncertain time we will stop going that extra mile because at the end of the day all this together the long delivery driving stability safety support string visits dot com S. A. I. A. dot com I've got a snack that will add a little cookbook into your keto diet or would that be keto Bulma either way southern recipe small batch for cried that the bold flavor that.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on News Radio 920 AM
"It zero right a and that means Mister bill o'reilly is joining us hello bill how are you I'm a little agitated this week will over work overworked mereka is was weeping I mean I got a lot going on here and I'm way ahead of all the stories and so let's say you're not paying attention so I when lighting so let's start with the whistle blower let's start with his attorney okay yeah who apparently has been plotting a coup against the president since two thousand seventeen shop online you know ya know so this is exactly the same playbook exactly the same that was used with Brett Kavanaugh there is no difference so take it take it through me they give her cabin for us a woman named Christine for yes surface with terrible allegations against Brett Kavanaugh she brought them to senator Feinstein in California who took in the information did not say anything to anyone for months and directed it ms forty two the most radical left attorney in the country a woman named Melinda Katz in Washington DC whereupon they dropped the bomb on capital okay everybody remember that yeah whistleblower his complaint Adam Schiff which does not include quid pro quo at the time okay whatever the complaint was instead of filing or holding a press conference going your superiors or wherever he goes that Adam ship who sits on the complaint back as senator Feinstein did and then directs the whistle blower do the most radical attorney political guy mark is a day in Washington DC a close friend of Melinda Katz do you see it is just starting to unfold in front of your eyes it's like it's like it's like you're Doug Henning the Canadian yes yeah so magical and I'm going to break out of a suitcase in a moment okay now this is directed at I can't say the group on the air but I know with the group is because the group did it to me both Blasi Ford and the whistle blower all of this was contrived and it was well executed in the in the way I just laid out to you there is no denying any of it so the whistle blower it really isn't a whistle blower he and I have named him and unmask him on bill o'reilly dot com I have taken my audience through we is he is a political activist working for the CIA I do yes all right any Knowles all of the activist groups in Washington DC knows them all because they all coordinate all right and that's how he got into the picture and I'm going to show you next week just a side note I'm gonna show you next week why the CI a coordinates with all of the political action active groups and why they know all of these things especially why the state department knows this mmhm wait until you see the deeper connections there but go ahead bill all right well is a cadre of people within the C. I. A. within the state department within national intelligence that are sympathetic to the liberal democratic agenda and that's what the justice department is going to on mask with the John dorm investigation we've already seen it in the F. B. I. we already know what exists but the whistle blowers part of that now if you are a federal whistle blower now are masquerading as one which you really a political activist working to destroy a presidency you are not entitled to any protections back no protections which is why I my new service on a name the man now why fox news and the other networks and everybody else doesn't do it is beyond my comprehension they all know because I told them exactly what this is this is activism blushing Ford is an activist her own attorney admitted it about a month ago always at all is that the abortion that's why we want to get capital on there you're not sympathetic to abortion she swept and said it so enter don junior going on the view a huge mistake even though I know why he did it because I did it I don't have you ever been on the view back I have once okay it was memorable bill you would have loved this one yeah you were going was like dying of sickness that this day and then you get yelled at by what was it what was it will be over in yeah it was will be remember I needed the whole thing about Barbara Walters being like a bat in swoop in in in and she was very offended so I I had to go up against Barbara Walters Whoopi Goldberg and joy Behar and they all lied about something I had the goods on in fact I had a river it was that they were holding a train in New York with their seats and they said how dare you say that nice it girl I was there I saw you I tried to sit in those seats because I got there before you and Amtrak would let me I even got Amtrak to go on record saying yeah that's that's what we did.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on Newsradio 700 WLW
"L. W. Mike Allen Saturday midday we're talking about the continued. demonization of Brett Kavanaugh a year after he was confirmed. to the United States Supreme Court here's a couple other things that again you're not gonna find this in the mainstream media. at this at the end of the book that these two New York times reporters wrote. they do acknowledge that. they're in a bit that Christine blouse it Christine blase forge a lifelong friend you might remember the name label and Kaiser. did not believe Christine blase forge tale of a sexual assault at a party they both supposedly attended now that was in contradiction to what was said at the hearing and for the first time. Kaiser spoke out for the record and you might recall again because it was named by Ford as a witness and of course she was one of four witnesses who denied any knowledge of the event in question and here's what ms Kaiser said on the record quote I was told behind the scenes that certain things we could be spread about me if I didn't comply. certain things could be spread about me if I didn't comply so I mean you couple that with everything else and again at the end of the day it all comes down to the beloved roe versus Wade. and there was another book written about this that I read it's fantastic book it's called justice on trial Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino wrote that it they report not the book but in a previous article forge father Christine blase porch father actually backed Kavanaugh's nomination and what they write is within days of Kavanaugh's confirmation of the Supreme Court a fascinating encounter took place Brett Kavanaugh is father was approached by Ford's father at the golf club where they are both members. Ralph blase Christine blase Ford's father went out of his way to offer ed Cavanaugh Brett Kavanaugh is dead support for his nomination to the Supreme Court and that's according to multiple sources and multiple people who actually heard this conversation take place at the burning tree club in Bethesda Maryland and. his father Brett kennels fathers quoted as saying I'm glad Brett was good now I'm sorry Christine blase ports father said I'm glad Brett was confirmed Ralph blase told ed cabin all shaking his hand and blase ended that the ordeal of been tough for both families you know I have you read about that anywhere in the mainstream media so much of this stuff if it doesn't fit in their narrative. they won't reported or if you like the New York times you just make it up I'm going to the phones here let me go to Emma good morning Emma. morning thanks for taking my call. I listen intently to your description of the knife delegation and I can tell you why in the fall okay. because I don't know any guy drunk enough that with another guy. in a woman's hand. you cut right to the chase their Emma but well you certainly have a point I mean you really do and that's kind of what I thought when I read it too but it's similar to the the basis allegation that was made by Deborah Ramirez that of course nobody can back up it's just one thing after another with this when are they gonna let the guy go. well this is just me a lot it doesn't make sense none of it makes sense and I I think we're just being held captive by the liberal media and you have people have to start thinking for themselves and reading both sides and. you know. I I read a lot and. I think I'm an independent but I do look at both sides and I think I don't know how these people live with themselves you know all of the thing I don't either I really don't Emma but would you agree at the end of the day at least ninety five percent of it all comes down to. their beloved roe versus Wade and they're going to discredit Brett Kavanaugh even when he is on the United States Supreme Court any way that they can in an attempt to intimidate him and some of the other right leaning justices do you think there's anything to that Emma. well I I feel like he did a great job defending himself I don't think that I mean he's he's on the court I don't think that he. in the case yeah intimidated at all. no I don't think so either night they tried to do that the Clarence Thomas back when he was confirmed he still getting all kinds of grief for that but I don't think you you're not going to intimidate Clarence Thomas and I don't think you can intimidate Brett Kavanaugh I sure appreciate that call was a good call and she does make a good point. if you listen to the lurid allegations on this later one yeah it is kind of hard to imagine I've got high witness hand on you know what in doing that and frankly I didn't even think about that but she makes a very very good point and again it's all about roe versus Wade the left is so worried that there could be a fifth vote to finally overturn it that they'll do anything anything to assassinate the character of a judge that they think may vote to repeal it. at any rate we're gonna go back to the callers after we get back from the news a lot of people interested in this topic Mike Allen newsradio seven hundred W. L. W.. traffic.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM
"Ninety three W. I. B. C. good morning it is important. that you take a breath it is important that you walk away from some of the madness of times. I mean if you spend your days your natural weekends on social media I'm willing to bet you all the money in my pocket gets all the money in your pocket is that you. have an unhappy life. how could be anything but. that doesn't mean that you can't pay attention you should be paying attention to things that are going on. like for example when the New York times lied. as they did. The New York Times lying. in their story about Brett Kavanaugh. it comes from a book from two New York times writers they took an excerpt and published in The New York Times. but the New York times left out key information the book is about Brett Kavanaugh the Supreme Court justice and makes the claim that another woman. may have been sexually harassed the part they left out the New York times but is in the book the woman is absolutely no recollection of anything like they describe happening with Brett Kavanaugh. they left that out of the New York times piece. purposefully. I would say. because it's not purposeful what else could it possibly be. it's germane to say yes we're hearing this story but the woman who is supposedly the victim a story can't confirm. further the person making the claim what is a lawyer who represented the plans. all of these things should matter to journalists. didn't matter to the New York times and this caps off a month a thirty day period. of just disaster. The New York Times and the purposeful way and not purposeful if not we'll fall then the only other thing they can do is plead ignorance and how does that work. the anatomy of a fail was what I discussed in this because it is. you can go through the tick tock I'm actually laying it out right now for another purpose. I mean I mean in out when I'm not on the I'm I'm literally going through all of that the documentation not anything that I have from from behind the scenes but all the public record. because you don't eat anything behind the scenes of what are the odds that you would actually get an answer. The New York Times hired Sarid young a woman who tweeted out that white people are trolls. what what what Sir if I ask them a question or wanted to do some investigating do you think I would get none of it's necessary it's all right there in the public view. including the latest. the story got called out is bunk the story is bond the book itself that's coming out is probably bond. I read it so I don't I don't know there are no reviews out or anything else. they got caught did The New York Times. in a lying. that's what they did. one of the authors of the article in the book her name is robin progression P. O. G. R. E. B. I. N.. and she has re tweeted an article. the article. how fox news twisted the Cavanaugh scandal into a way to attack the New York times..
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on KLBJ 590AM
"She did not go to Princeton. she went to Yale. yes your classmate was. Brett Kavanaugh. this is beyond farcical. the CZ in same into higher. higher tower falling down on the New York times head. and they don't apologize sure they delete some tweets but they don't apologize. I have listened to Brian Stelter and Chris Cillizza and the rest of these so called journalist keep telling me that they are not the problem the problem is trump. I didn't do this guy's unless you are credit trouble driving everybody so completely out of their minds crazy that they lose touch with reality in which case Donald Trump totally did this. your times they're the only people they have to blame or themselves. I need you if you continue to look at them as a news source everybody The New York Times is trash. because I want to be this way but because they want to be this way how about the squad. they're pushing if your if your member of Congress or your center is pushing for the impeachment of Brett Kavanaugh they need to go. what are the what are the abilities of recall how quickly are you going to work on mounting a challenge to them in an election they have no right to be there by the way if they're there I assume they're going to Democrats if you're a Democrat run against them. you're allowed to be a Democrat I may disagree with your policy we are calling for man's impeachment based on total lies. doing that it is criminally insane. there's something wrong with you I do I want you to get therapy. is it like to be so I was so loosely remarkably hateful. that your life engage the life believe the lie even when the lie is proving to be a law you still puts the lie. calling for impeachment. sit down represented Presley. you know you're wrong just say so and then stop being wrong. it's just. this story. is. I don't know what the anatomy of what. the anatomy of the fail I guess you could say. you will get what they did and look at all of the places they could have very easily stop this from happening and they didn't. they didn't stop this from happening because they clearly wanted it to happen they wanted. desperately. to have this story. they did offer abortion. but Deborah Katz said they did also. they can keep a portion. really who they are. why cheat defame demoralize attack. ruin reputations. cost legal fees. for a portion. The New York Times is unworthy. one worthy. anybody's respect. president trump and put out a tweet that the entirety of the New York times to resign. we're not gonna get that lucky. part of their fail as their lack of shame. the one thing that could save them I'm Tony cats. if you own your car for a while or.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on WBZ NewsRadio 1030
"Court justice Brett Kavanaugh seem to be losing a little bit of steam this morning new allegations from a witness who claims to have watched misconduct by the justice at a Yale college party decades ago puts president trump now on the attack at a rally in New Mexico the president calls instead for the resignation of the New York times editors who broke the story ABC senior national correspondent Terry Moran has more about the new claim the shocking story strikingly similar to an allegation made by another Yale classmate Deborah merece at the height of Kavanaugh's confirmation battle Ramirez alleged Cavanaugh exposed himself to her at a different party when they were both drunk and when she shoved him away she says she was touched with. her consent Kevin off flatly denying that at all allegations of sexual misconduct still Senate Democrats say they're asking the F. B. I. and the Senate Judiciary Committee to investigate the new claims about Kavanaugh's past the NFL ramps up its investigation into patriots wide receiver Antonio brown after the woman accusing him of sexual assault and rape concludes her meeting with league officials are now more misconduct allegations against the NFL superstar W. B. C. T. V.'s Michael cross with detail a second accuser has now come forward on Ortiz told Sports Illustrated brown exposed himself to her while she was in his home to paint a mural his lawyer denied the accusations in a tweet saying Antonio brown has reviewed the sexual misconduct allegations made by an unnamed artist included any recent publishes sports illustrated oracle and denies that he ever engaged in such activities there will be no further comment at this time the NFL has yet to comment on either of these accusations the artist in question is not seeking damages or pursuing charges but told Sports Illustrated that she was bothered by his behavior a glimmer of hope for the nationwide measles epidemic health officials of the United States say there were no new cases of measles reported last week first time that's happened in months that's a sign of the nation's worst epidemic of the disease in nearly thirty years may be in its final stages it reportedly started with travelers who became infected overseas but spread quickly among unvaccinated people here in the United States so far this year more than twelve hundred measles cases have been confirmed after being inducted into the baseball hall of fame this past summer a former Yankee closer receives another high honor at the White House in from today presenting the presidential medal of freedom hall of Famer and legendary New York Yankees pitcher Mariano Rivera his dominance in the mount mesmerized. fans teammates and unfortunately for them it mesmerized the competitors it's the highest honor given to a civilian the president has awarded it to golfer Tiger Woods Rivera has recently defended his relationship with the president saying on fox news this summer that Mr trump was a friend of his before he took office and he respects him and what he's doing for this country Karen Travers ABC news the White House and six oh eight let's check in on business news this morning Bloomberg business Andrew day joins us good morning Andrew. what is your first feature heading slightly lower as European markets lacked direction with the consequences of the weekend drone attack on Saudi Aramco oil facilities still hitting the market even as oil futures here pull back about a dollar a barrel to about sixty two S. B. futures down four nasdaq futures down sixteen is.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on KFI AM 640
"The Manhattan DA's office late last month a right after it opened a criminal investigation into the role that the president and his family played at the family business I should say played in the payments that were made to stormy Daniels remember that whole story. because we know that the president and. the trump organization reimbursed Michael calling the. a fixer of former fixer. for money that Michael Cullen actually paid to stormy Daniels in the form of a hundred and thirty thousand dollars a year member Michael calling the Weasley guy wanted up in front of Congress it's going to called Donald Trump a cheat in your open testimony. what would you call yourself. full number he got sentenced to three years in the in jail for his. friend or campaign finance law violations. now federal prosecutors those same federal prosecutors who went after Michael Cullen put in a court filing in July that they had basically no there term was they had effectively concluded their inquiry into the possible crimes that were committed by either the trump company or any of its executives but the DA in Manhattan Cyrus Vance now is exploring whether those reimbursements may have violated any New York state law now here's what they're gonna do is they're looking for like I said eight years worth of tax returns from Donald Trump and the trump organization. it's a state crime. if the company falsely accounts for these reimbursements as a legal expense. because it's it's falsifying a business record that can be a crime it would be a felony though if prosecutors could prove that this false filing was then made to commit or conceal another crime like attacks violation or bank fraud who knows what they find who knows if there's anything in there even but remember Donald Trump was the guy who said during the campaign over and over again he would return read leases tax returns and then never dead okay so that was broken by The New York Times I don't know if the New York times has learned from this but they stepped on their own Cavanaugh over the weekend. they published a an excerpt of a book that's coming out about Brett Kavanaugh and the whole history with him going to privilege schools and weapon out of Johnson in front of people. and when they put this in. the paper over the weekend. they used a story in there. from a former classmate of Brett Kavanaugh and this former classmate a dude named Max Stiers says he saw Brett Kavanaugh with his pants down at a drunken dorm party when they were both freshman. and friends pushed Brett Kavanaugh his **** into the hand of a female student listen I've been wrestling with this in my head for the last say thirty six hours how does a friend push part of you into that person's hand. it doesn't make any sense to me but whatever let's assume at this point that this is a new sexual assault allegation. what the New York times didn't tell you when they first published the story was. the female student whose hand was said to have been receiver of the ****. that female student declined to be interviewed by these two women in the friends say she doesn't even recall the episode now that's not. that's not saying it didn't happen but that is a massive fact that you cannot leave out of that story. New York times got blown up for this all over the internet. and now when you go and read that story they did include that extra sentence the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the episode they did not include that when they first published published that story. but in the meantime. several of the democratic presidential candidates are now lining up to call for the impeachment of a Supreme Court justice. Kamel Harris said after the times report that bright cabin allied to the U. S. Senate most importantly to the American people he must be impeached remember she's also the one who jumped to the defense of the crime victim just the small let. Elizabeth Warren said confirmation is not exoneration these newest revelations are disturbing like the man who appointed him Cavanaugh should be impeached better Rourke tweeted we know he lied under oath he should be impeached. and he accused the Senate of forcing the FBI to rush the investigation to save the nomination Julian Castro it's more clear than ever that Brett Kavanaugh lied under oath Bernie Sanders didn't refer to impeachment by name but he did say he would support any appropriate constitutional mechanism to hold Cavanaugh accountable the only constitutional mechanism is impeachment a whole Cory Booker wrote this new allegation an additional corroborating evidence as to a long list of reasons why Brett Kavanaugh should apply be a Supreme Court justice. people think. people think he should be impeached for that I'm not saying he's a good guy I'm saying that those are still the actions of a guy who's a total a hole. but it. dot dot dot. all right we come back story time with uncle Joe we got to get back into this not a joke not joke. Hey buddy get out that board you off the board rock come up and drag you off. hi Joe Biden will say about his knife and chain fight story with. corn pop everybody knows corn pops back up was a bad news but I do sounds like something out of West Side Story it was later not a movie about gangs or something. I don't know I never saw it what are what. you never seen West Side Story no I didn't see westside story Amy. Amy Amy Amy. some time ago. at once. met a.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on WIBC 93.1FM
"Latest tweet. this latest we all on this subject how did the New York times phrase it. having a **** thrust in your face in a drunken dorm party may seem like harmless fun. but when Brett Kavanaugh did to her jabber mera says it confirmed that she didn't belong at Yale in the first place. what heartburn well the New York times just told you that having a **** dressed in your face it's just harmless fun. well. hi I'm. do you know the **** in question. may maybe maybe familiar **** yes. maybe straight no. don't tell me what the hell pretty sorry this is the New York times all I'm doing is quoted in trying to understand them they deleted the street. three times in the past thirty days The New York Times had to delete their tweets The New York Times archives The New York Times The New York Times opinion. because they just can't figure out how to engage story and how to be honest about a story and how to not in any way shape or form look like morons with the story. but I but the in the printing of the story proves they're not even interested in journalism. don't trust them. don't listen to them. but we'll keep pointing out when they fail. they're no longer all the news that's fit to print they have no right being the paper of record that has to end. so does their inability to.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on KTRH
"It's that time time time. lock and load. remember Christine lazy for. she was the woman who came forward to destroy the character and the intention was to torpedo the nomination. of Brett Kavanaugh. to the Supreme Court. historically America standard when the Senate. was asked to ratify a nomination made by the president to the Supreme Court. historically the only question the Senate took up. was the judicial fitness. of a potential nominee. that's not to say that every nominee was rubber stamped by the Senate. but judicial fitness does not get in to how you would. cool in a particular case. it wouldn't be asked it shouldn't be known is this a pro life or pro choice justice pro death penalty or anti death penalty. gun control or second amendment. these weren't questions that were historically ****. of our nominees. because there was consideration given. to the provocative of a president. to nominate individuals to the Supreme Court that was part of being the president. that's why the votes mattered that's why who was president mattered. because the presumption that that individual was going to nominate people that probably agreed with the president's. core principles no that didn't always happen. there were a series of justices nominated by Republican presidents Eisenhower the worst among them but Nixon had a couple of self. who were presumed. to be rock ribbed conservatives. and ended up being leftist judges hello Warren probably the worst among them. but that's not the point. the point is. the president serves the role of nominating an individual to the United States Supreme Court. the Senate does not have the role did not historically was not foreseen was not intended. to have the ability. to decide whether they approved. of that person's. positions. on political issues the Supreme Court should have been bigger than that. but that's exactly what it's become. M. Brett Kavanaugh was Brett Kavanaugh was perceived to be a guy who would govern as a conservative by the way who would rule as a concert by the way he hasn't. and interestingly if you wanted a real conservative Brett Kavanaugh what in your choice. but the left didn't care about those sorts of things. they were better off with capital then the woman who was waiting in the wings. and if you want to see a real civil war. hopefully shots won't be far but if you want to see it get nasty. if Ruth Bader Ginsburg. steps down or is unable to serve. between now and the end of next summer. and president trump has the opportunity. to nominate the woman that most myself included believe he will nominate. we're going to go from a judicial activist Screamin little liberal. in the person of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. to a real conservative. on social issues as well. and when the left looks at her body of work they're going to lose their minds. but we'll get to that model. video footage of Christine Blazey Ford's lawyer. shows her saying. that Ford wanted to put quote an asterisk next to end quote justice Brett Kavanaugh's name. before he takes a scalpel. the roe V. Wade aftermath of these hearings I believe the Christine's testimony brought about more good than harm misogynist Republicans caused by allowing cabin out on the court we were going to have a conservative actions have consequences. but he will always have an asterisk next to his name when he takes a scalpel to Robi wait we will know who he is we know his character and we know what motivates him and that is important it is important that we know and that was part of what motivated Christine. they continue to malign this ma'am. they continue to smear him. and what may be forgotten in all of this. they never proved any of it. in fact not only did they not prove it. if they had any shame that would have been embarrassed. when they were exposed for exactly what they had done to the man. remember the party the first party we were told about and all the terrible things he did. did they bring another a single witness. to corroborate the story. a single witness. could miss Lacey forty even recall the house. where this seminal moment in her life occurred. why no she couldn't. could she tell us who dropped her off at the party were the most horrible thing in her life occurred why no she couldn't. she tell us who took her away from the party well the most horrible thing in her life occurred why no she couldn't. did she have a single friend willing to stand up and say Christine is an honorable woman she was well respected at the time why no she couldn't. we were told Brett Kavanaugh was the worst man ever but it wasn't working wasn't working what can we do what can we do well first we used to hurry up and wait approach and that was. we didn't reveal these things until just before the vote. when there was an artificial crisis created. had to vote we had to vote we're gonna vote quickly. and surely somebody would make all this up. right. well that one work okay all right okay soul then we had the senators having meetings with her alone senators who oppose trump who said they were gonna post that one more then we had Maisie her Rano crazy Maisie from Hawaii and she said the men need to sit down and shut up they don't get to have opinions on this well that didn't work but it but it was creating quite a bit of tension. that's what this was all about right putting an asterisk beside his name that's what this was all designed to do. then we needed more we needed a pattern. rather than just look at this case we needed a pattern and so the pattern was with we brought someone else for. we had the esteemed Michael AVR nadie bring someone for remember the woman he brought forward do you even remember her name. why no you don't because she was disgraced as a liar and a fabricator and. something likened not job. and we had another one come forward and remember. the guy who was at NBC and he said NBC wouldn't carry the story so The New Yorker magazine did and then he was practically run out of town and ruin his good name he's a guy that exposed Harvey Weinstein his good name was run because it turned out there was no corroborating evidence for that and it looked very much to have been made up. eventually.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on 550 KFYI
"Of course you can have more for you to hear from the debate what the candidates had to say last night and a preview of what's going to be happening tonight as we have the next round of the debates happening this evening and what the Democrats will say from the podiums tonight will it be any different it's going to be around through two of come out Harris verses Joe Biden will he be a little bit more prepared for I don't know why he was unprepared for the attack I mean you have to expect anything Cory Booker is saying the Joe Biden is the author of mass incarcerations and it's so funny to watch them cannibalize like this and it's just this desire to win at all costs it doesn't matter we watch them destroy Brett Kavanaugh they knew the Brett Kavanaugh was a good man it was the it was again he was collateral damage to an agenda that they thought needed to happen so anxious to see how that goes just after eight o'clock we'll talk expand a little bit more on this border issue we just talked with Hogan Gidley who was that the principal deputy press secretary in the White House it will grow always good to hear from the White House but have somebody that's got the president's ear and is a part of the press team as high up as he is was informational talking about the border but just after eight o'clock the Rio Grande Valley breaks a record and not a good record border apprehensions were gonna get to that coming up just after eight these issues are not going away but it's the idea of how does how do the Republicans the conservatives that are running for office or running for reelection get the message out in a way that resonates with people there are times you got to fight there are times when you have to just pound the issues you know the old saying is that when you have when you have the truth you pound the truth when you don't have the truth you pound the desk the Democrats are pounding the desk there's no doubt about that the Democratic Party right now is pounding the desk they have lost on the economy trickle down economics a rising tide lifts all boats all these things that they said were a false narrative are proving to be absolutely true when they have been done the right way and on the economy the president's done it the right way the tax cuts are working the the businesses small and large in America are adding more jobs added we'll talk about the jobs that have been added in the next hour so if the Republicans across the board if candidates for office can stick to the issues they are going to be very successful because the policies have been very successful.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on 850 WFTL
"Made about Brett Kavanaugh and matching them with his record in his first full term on the court those predictions seem patently absurd but I would say for people who are doubting and you know whether he was a good pick or what not that he he had some good decisions this term he showed the ability to work with other people and and be persuasive with other people and he continued what have a lot of people excited about him which is a concern about the growth of the administrative state which is the biggest civil liberties threat in America right now and just the general continued when some nationalist and about how to operate on the court shall I would give him at least a couple more years to see what you think about it absolutely listen you know they're well I just talk to my audience earlier about how many conservatives really have to hold their nose when they voted in the presidential election and how today when you look at the democratic field that so you know going to be of picking their nominee to run against president trump if I could vote for Donald Trump three thirteen times today I would you know so so you do have to watch and see how a person is once they're in office you know I doubted the conservative credentials even though I was an early supporter I was nervous and today I'm not nervous because I have a record and the record is excellent so are the same hope hopefully I'll have the same feeling about bread cabin on a big fan of Neil Gorsuch but not yet of ready to say yea Cavanaugh would really will be interesting is what are they going to do when the perhaps Donald Trump as president gets to nominate a replacement for a liberal justice I can't even imagine yeah it's frightening to think it is one of the things which we try to give people the contact of what was happening in the confirmation process one of the things we thought why not just the general pattern of of hearing a particular here you can't get out of the public and the Democrats appeared more easily I did got much more ten seventy years but it really spike every time there is a major change in the court coming help only some pork I because one of the first big explosions that people remember that was one of eight a twenty eight up for grabs and then you thought that with him replacing Thurgood Marshall who was one of the most liberal jackets with the core of course being now can a workplace at the moment now now it's on the most conservative justices so that confirmation process we thought last year with Cavanaugh replacing Kennedy a swing vote exactly thought that their faith in a strange okay what can we expect if it were a little chapter six from the place where the swing is even more dramatic I I agree I think it can be really frightening to watch I think that's why we have to be prepared absolutely ladies of the book is excellent justice on trial the cabin a confirmation in the future of the Supreme Court by Mollie Hemingway and Carrie Severino I appreciate you both coming on with me today and this book it actually it was fascinating I admit it read like a novel and I was there so was you know is the so I knew the story I knew the outcome and yet I was riveted so great great job thank you so much thank you so much all right all right let's take a quick break be right back.
"brett kavanaugh" Discussed on KTRH
"I'm not a fan of having on not a fan of John Roberts said simple in when Brett Kavanaugh is being discussed as a possible nominee I rejected it this is nothing to do with the the horrible way was treated during the confirmation process but I rejected specifically because of what he wrote in the obamacare case which was effectively plagiarized by John Roberts and I think that's being born out now and will be borne out again and again and again well beyond my lifetime because he's younger than I am I please you know there's there's a huge difference between Clarence Thomas from Brett Kavanaugh they both went through hellish confirmation process he's no question about it no question about it but Clarence Thomas lucky let me say this right now is one of the greatest justices in American history his writings are brilliant absolutely brilliant his fidelity to the constitution to the facts presented to the court to the statutes presented to the court is absolute his fidelity is absolute he is a truly remarkable and special justice and a man of enormous fortitude and courage because I know you know and I'm sure he knows that if he were of the mindset and activists like will spend against back he will be celebrated throughout the American culture throughout the American media as it is they dismissed him and they have contempt for him but Clarence Thomas in my view is among the top ten greatest justices in American history I'm telling you that right now might even be higher a truly remarkable brilliant individual Brett Kavanaugh is a garden variety the nella justice because he's white too political and so is Robert and so is Roberts Roberts came up with this rule Goldberg like logic in order to save this statute obamacare and he's gonna have to do it again in cabin I'll be right there by aside it won't matter what the constitution says it won't matter what the legislative history is it won't matter what the facts are they already know what they're gonna do that's a complete breakdown of the judicial system complete breakdown did you know a majority of Hispanic voters approve of citizenship question on the US census we heard this Jennifer Harper another great reported The Washington Times two thirds of voters approve of a citizenship question the twenty twenty census and that includes a majority of Hispanic voters despite claims by democratic lawmakers that the inquiry would discourage participation in Latino communities a Harvard University center for American political studies and Harris poll they'll be harbor that took money from peta file I Jeffrey Epstein found that sixty seven percent sixty seven percent support the question ninety two percent a trump voters ninety percent of conservatives but a majority of Hispanics Latinos you won't hear that from girl what is his name I'm serious Carol Errol Louis of New York one a newsman you won't hear that he probably thinks majority of Hispanics must therefore be racist or we could turn to Carl Bernstein he thinks majority Hispanic suggest hypnotized or something's wrong with them because they don't agree with him when we need additional report Taj to figure out what's taking place you know but I thought you'd want to know the and the yeah one of the great issues that the Democrats on the left and the media been pushing for years fifteen dollar minimum wage well a fifteen dollar minimum wage according to the left of center Congressional Budget Office would result in the loss of one point three million American jobs particularly among the poorest and least skilled Americans one point three million jobs but don't worry ladies and gentleman the left stands for the little guy yeah they stand for the little people it's not a problem fifteen dollar minimum wage doesn't matter what work actually do it doesn't matter whether the the business you work for a small let's start up medium huge fifteen dollar minimum wage doesn't matter how well or poorly the company's capitalized to the small business cap that matter fifteen dollar minimum wage thank you get everything for free and I said to myself today if you get everything for free why would you.