35 Burst results for "Bob Muller"

'This Is the Stuff That Mobs Do': Blowing Hillary's Russia Collusion Conspiracy Wide Open

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:29 min | 3 weeks ago

'This Is the Stuff That Mobs Do': Blowing Hillary's Russia Collusion Conspiracy Wide Open

"Bob muller comes onto the scene in the spring of seventeen after president trump fires komi right and paul ryan and too many republicans agreed to put muller on all under this cloud of the multi. What you're trying to tell me is the millions of dollars that hillary clinton pumped through was also maybe used to sweeten some journalists to write stories about this russia. Thing potentially right. I mean this story was so totally artificial. We got bob muller of yeah. I would go one step further. It's not even potentially it happened. Look we took sixty depositions under chairman newness under oath. They're all public now. Adam schiff didn't want him out. Rick grenell allied declassified them two years later and we put him out there online you can read the sussman deposition that i took that cited. In the durham indictment. That says he was talking to members of the media at the behest of client the client being the dnc fusion gps. Doing the same thing taking the same false sturt going to media and saying you guys got to put this story out and then. Here's the kicker hillary clinton and jake sullivan come in and tweet out information. As if they've never heard of it before and say look. President trump has a secret back channel to russia. If you remember this stuff in the fall of sixteen and they were the ones paying for it they pretending to know nothing about it and then they had a willing media. This is the stuff that mobs do literally. I mean this this monkey. It really

Bob Muller President Trump Rick Grenell Paul Ryan Hillary Clinton Muller Adam Schiff Russia Sussman Jake Sullivan Durham DNC
James Comey and Truth in Government

The Book Review

05:41 min | 9 months ago

James Comey and Truth in Government

"Joe klein joins us now to talk about a new book. From james comey. It's called saving justice truth. Transparency and trust. Joe thanks for being here screwed to be with you. All right joe. You don't need any introduction but for those who are not familiar with. Joey is a former writer for the new yorker former columnist for time magazine author of many many books including perhaps most famously when that did not appear with his byline primary colors And a follow up novel running meat and this week he reviews for us at james. Comey's second book so the obvious question. I have to ask i is. How does this book differ from his previous book. Well it doesn't differ very much at all actually except for one thing. He rehearses all of the confrontations he had with donald trump in both books but in the second book he places that in the context of the need for truth and transparency in government. Which i think is a valuable thing. The book is the repetition of the first book but it's not an insignificant repetition because of the the context that he now placed it so the first book higher loyalty was kind of hybrid memoir both from his earlier days as a prosecutor in the department of justice and then for his brief period at the doj under trump but it was also kind of manifesto about justice. It feels like on the surface this new book saving justice is kind of exactly the same thing. Well yeah it is. It is the same thing and it's obviously something that cody feels very strongly about. But i think you know the important thing here is his view of justice and his view of the fbi remember he was the fbi director. Whom trump fired because he allowed the russian investigation continue which resulted after he was fired in the hiring. A bob muller as special investigator but komi has a very distinctive view of justice. And i and its ecclesiastical he sees the members of the justice department all the way down to assisted. Da's out in the country as being part of a sacred priesthood sworn to absolute honesty to complete probity to conducting the business in entirely facts based and nonpartisan manner and you can see how that might conflict with donald trump right. Does he talk about what's happened at the department of justice since his departure. He doesn't talk about that all that much except to say that it has been corrupted by trump trump spent the last four years trying to make it into a partisan weapon to go after his enemies in. Kobe is appalled by that. One of the things that you do in your review is draw the distinctions between trump's view of justice and company's point of view. Is that something that komi himself dozen. The boker was that you. He doesn't to a certain extent. But i teased it out a little bit from me. The most important thing that is kind of gone overlooked about trump if anything can be said to have been overlooked is his view of the world which came out in the second debate with joe biden where he said only low. Iq refugees showed up for their refugee hearings in other words. The smart ones absconded. Only stupid people abide by the laws. Smart people get around it. Only stupid people pay off their creditors. Smart people stiffen and that is donald trump's operating philosophy and unfortunately it seems to be the operating philosophy a lot of his followers and that stands in direct contravention of commes operating philosophy. Which is you gotta tell the truth. I don't think you could find two more temperamentally opposite. People trump and komi. But what's interesting at least in the little bit of this book that i read it seems is a slight shift in tone from the last book i mean in part it seems like he's he is trying to draw contrast he opens up the book with donald trump sort of leaning back in his chair and telling him that putin showed off to him apparently about russia having the best prostitutes in the world. And he's telling that james comey. Yeah that would not go over very well. Comas is a religious catholic and And as i said he's religious about the notion of justice and truth. I mean he tells a story about his early days as a us district attorney where he was working a drug case and he had a government informant named vinny and it turned out that they put vinnie in the witness protection program and vinnie took the opportunity to get married. The problem is that he was also married in his former life which meant he was now a bigamist which is a crime and komi says that it was his absolute responsibility. Even though the bigamy had nothing to do with the drug case in question to tell the other side the defendant's lawyers that vinnie was a bigamist. And that shows you the degree to which komi will go in the defense of the truth almost to the point of myopia. I

Justice Department James Comey Donald Trump Comey Joe Klein Bob Muller FBI Komi Trump Trump The New Yorker Time Magazine Joey JOE Cody James DA Kobe
Revisiting Criminal Obstruction of Justice in the Impeachment Inquiry

Sean Hannity

02:20 min | 2 years ago

Revisiting Criminal Obstruction of Justice in the Impeachment Inquiry

"Twenty sixteen mana for was the chairman of the trump campaign anti corruption prosecutors in Ukraine disclosed that a pro Russia Russian political party and you're more payments from manta for it from an illegal slush fund manifold resigned from the campaign two weeks later do you crazy members of parliament and press for investigations into whether the prosecutor's revelation of payment records which were first published in The New York Times it violated Ukrainian laws that in some cases prohibit prosecutors from revealing evidence before trial both lawmakers asserted that if the release of the slush fund information broke the law that it would should be reviewed as an illegal effort to influence the United States presidential election in favor of Hillary now then I would then guide the not only that court decision I would then guide the director of the FBI to January eleventh twenty seventeen and politico that's where they discuss the NC operative contractor Alexander Chilumpha meeting with the Ukrainians in the Ukrainian embassy in Washington for the purpose they say in politico hardly a right wing outlet that for the purpose of getting dirt on trump and trump associates to help Hillary Clinton and that it all backfired because they backed the wrong horse and well Donald Trump one now they're in trouble so I'm not so I'm not sure why director ray is having a problem with this but him not knowing this to me is like the equivalent of Bob Muller not knowing what fusion GPS is or not knowing that genie ray was once Clinton's attorney at the Clinton foundation and by the way and now we're gonna get lectured by the wing man for Barack Obama Eric holder he's lecturing bill Barr about who's fit and not fit to be an Attorney General I guys so when the tank for Barack Obama that he called himself all bombers wing man is now complaining that the president's Attorney General bill Barr is not independent enough you got to be kidding me former Attorney General Eric holder Billy's bar is unfit to serve as the nation's top law enforcement officer writing in The Washington Post not bad a recent controversial comments you mean the

Clinton Foundation Attorney General Eric Holder B Attorney Alexander Chilumpha NC Russia The Washington Post Officer President Trump Barack Obama Bill Barr Chairman Bob Muller RAY Donald Trump Hillary Clinton Washington
Former FBI lawyer and frequent Trump target Lisa Page speaks out

Pat Thurston

01:35 min | 2 years ago

Former FBI lawyer and frequent Trump target Lisa Page speaks out

"Lisa page does the name sounds familiar to you Lisa page Donald Trump brings up her name a lot and that is the reason that she is now speaking out she did an interview for the daily beast recently is the first time she has gone public actually spoken publicly about herself the way the president is treating her and what what happened between those text messages between Lisa page and Peter Strock Lisa pager Peter struck were having an affair Peter straw was an FBI agent he was somebody who was working and she was too she was an FBI it lawyer they were both working on two important investigations will miss the investigations and Hillary Clinton's emails the other was the investigation into Russian meddling in the election and specifically into the potential that members of Donald trump's campaign had been meeting with had been somehow unwillingly or willingly cooperating with Russia in Russian interference into the elections so they were the two two of the people who were involved in this Peter struck ended up on Bob Muller steam later and when Bob Muller got wind of these text messages between these two people he's all right away that this it would raise suspicions of potential bias in the investigation he didn't want that to happen he immediately pushed us struck off of the team so struck was no longer a part of Mahler's

Donald Trump President Trump Peter Peter Straw FBI Hillary Clinton Russia Bob Muller Mahler Lisa Peter Strock
Democrats Stuck After Mueller Testimony

The Ben Shapiro Show

03:27 min | 2 years ago

Democrats Stuck After Mueller Testimony

"Democrats are sort of stuck between Iraq and a heart place. You spend two years telling your voters. The president trump will be ridden outta town on a rail because muller you're more shows up and it turns out that he is not solid it turns out that he is wavering it turns out that he doesn't know his own report. A Demo Republicans were basically able to establish that he was not familiar with his own stuff which means that it kind of felt like this was politically motivated and we're about have to find out in the next month whether this investigation was properly initiated and conducted Inspector General of the D._O._J.. Michael Horowitz is about to bring out a report about the beginnings of the trump Russia investigation. I'm sure that will be fascinating. Stuff is reported certainly on the Hillary investigation and was fascinating reading and pretty damning for a lot of the folks involved in all of this well Democrats are not going to let go of this and that includes the people who are most closely tied to it so Andrew McCabe who was fired from the F._B._i.. For lying to the F._B._I.. He lost his pension over it and that was because he lied to the F._B._i.. About whether he had spoken to the press with the permission of James Komi About Hillary Clinton's investigation well now Andrew McCabe is back on television suggesting it's time for Congress to pursue impeachment based on what he really can't explain not based on anything Muller said that we didn't already know for sure from my own experience at the very beginnings of this investigation we confronted some very hard choices choices that we knew would have negative repercussions on our organization on US personally and we made those choices anyway because it was our job and our duty to do so <hes> I feel strongly that that's the same position Congress's in now and they should step up to the plate and do their job. It doesn't mean that the president will be removed from office or should be removed for off from office or we'll be impeached but it is absolutely clear to me that the time has come for Congress to pursue a dedicated impeachment inquiry. This is becoming a talking point. People who are very invested in this thing are not going to let it go. It's good for trump because he can point to them. You can say listen you petty jerks. There's a full investigation. There is no recommendation of Prosecution Muller himself would not even answer whether he would prosecute me. Why in the world are we still still doing this routine? If you don't like me so much you can beat me at the ballot box by the way trump is beatable if we're all the talk about the Democrats being cast which is true right now. Trump is underwater in Ohio by four percentage points according to variables including morning consoles. He's he's underwater in Iowa now. He could still win those states. He's expected to win those states in fact against Democrat those just as popularity ratings still trump is vulnerable and yet democrats don't seem to want to run against trump. They seem to want to impeach him or at least talk about impeaching him for the purposes of smearing him as a Russian catspaw. Even though that all fell apart the other folks who were invested in this members of the media deeply invested C._N._n.. Everyday Breaking News Wolf Blitzer. We have a brand new piece of news. I work out every day and unfortunately the gym that I attend very often as C._N._N.. On and so I'm well aware of the chirons that C._N._N.. Runs every single day and the chirons for two years were about breaking news bombshell report trump's presidency over the Russia scandal explodes and then it turns out that the thing is a complete waste of time pretty much and C._N._N.. Ain't GonNa let that go because it makes them. Look bad so here on C._N._N.. Or folks yesterday trying to say listen listen listen just because Bob Muller appeared to be old and dithering doesn't mean that the underlying content isn't important guys. You're building this up because you thought that Bob Muller I was GONNA walk in like Tom Cruise in the top gun trailer and just own it and that is not the way this worked here is C._N._N..

Donald Trump Bob Muller Andrew Mccabe Hillary Clinton President Trump Russia Congress Michael Horowitz Iraq Wolf Blitzer Tom Cruise James Komi Ohio United States Iowa Two Years
Former Federal Prosecutor on Mueller Testimony

Ethan Bearman

13:27 min | 2 years ago

Former Federal Prosecutor on Mueller Testimony

"Is the day after now we have the benefit of following up on the testimony of Robert Muller yesterday in the two house committees the judiciary in the intelligence committees immediately afterwards but now people have had a little bit of time to ruminate about what they heard what went on what it all meant and we have a couple of people who will be joining us this afternoon the first one I am delighted to say is Laurie Levenson Laurie Levenson is a professor of law at Loyola law school and she's also a former federal prosecutor and she joins us right now Hey Lori welcome to KGO thank you so much I'm so pleased to be with you I am pleased to have you as well I I don't know why but I didn't realize that you were a former federal prosecutor and I just think that gives you a different kind of look at what went on yesterday than those of us who are lay people especially those of us who aren't even lawyers so from the get go let's start it it out easy what did you think what was your overall impression of his testimony you know you're right I see things a little differently I think lot of people when they tuned in wanted to see the show and I was more interested in the information that we got so I so what mother many other peoples you know Bob Miller is not a great witness most lawyers are not that's not a comfortable role for him but that's not what mattered I think what was important was in the first session they were identifying four to five instances of obstruction and laying out what they believe the president and all these men did in that regard and the Republicans were using it for a totally different type of hearing they wanted this hearing to be held at the mall or investigation get started so was much more of a political show than it was but as we would say a legal proceeding I saw the hearing though before Adam ships committee a little differently for small Adam is a former federal prosecutor I had the pleasure working with him and his family just like that you know he sat out the theme that this is about this loyalty to the country and line and greed and I thought the questioning was much crisper at that point and I think Miller was giving up a little bit more than he had in the morning yeah in the morning it seemed as if a specially at the outset his questions were so limited and there were only certain areas that tended to animate him so a lot of the criticism that we heard immediately following and even into today and if you're reading newspaper articles today and especially if you tune into fox which I really try not to do that a lot of the criticism really does have to do with the performance of Robert Muller and not with the content the context of the information that was being presented what a lot of people say is that it didn't make any difference to the viewing public that most people had already taken a side on this and that based on Muller's testimony nobody is going to change their opinions you agree well I think that there is sort of this entrenchment in politics and along the parties we certainly saw that among the you know congressman who were there and they seem to just follow the pod poly it party flying but you know I am a little more optimistic I mean some of the messaging I do think that across there was and has been and continues to be tremendous Russian interference so to the extent that it gives the president stopped to acting cavalierly about his relationship with pollutants and stop saying things like well yeah I take that information again maybe that's a little bit of a step I don't think that people are going to believe that there's an exoneration but on the other hand I don't think a lot of people here so in the big steps now I don't think it moves the needle in open court and closer to impeachment in fact we may back off from it but the facts are a lot clearer having heard them from Bob Muller yeah I would have I will I want to believe this and so maybe that's the reason I say I would have work I am a member of the Judiciary Committee I would want to move forward with impeachment increase with it with the hearings not a voting right now on articles but moving forward and getting some of the other important figures from the Mahler report and others you know this doesn't have to be limited to what was disclosed in the mall report other witnesses to come in and to testify as to the corruption and the potential criminality in the high crimes and misdemeanors of the of Donald Trump wouldn't you well I think that's where they're headed I mean and I heard that during the hearing name suspect they really want don McGann to come in and testify I don't know if he's any better than Bob Muller is as a witness but I suspect he might be and he certainly had the direct contact with the president I'm here is that nobody got the president to actually provide a statement in person I think that's the biggest lacking in this entire investigation I don't disagree with you that continuing the requests for subpoenas makes sense but there's a trade off and that's what Nancy Pelosi saying she saying are we gonna lose our own people will never get the trump people but will we get lose our own people by being so busy focusing on that and not moving the needle on some real issues that need to be addressed problems out of the house out of the house they can do whatever they want to Mitch McConnell's going to kill it right and I'm you know and that's what the the patch for those who don't want to do impeachment is to say why are we going to do this when we know what's going to happen in the Senate but the outlook tournament of argument is we still don't have all the facts yet you know in my mind do you bring in more witnesses didn't have hope picks come in and don McGann but he just go for like the tax returns because if you have to pay that there are other directions all right lord let me ask you this and I'm I'm very serious about this were speaking by the way with Laurie Levenson she's a professor of law at Loyola and she's a former professor of federal prosecutor now I forget residents saying it was a so utterly important I don't remember anyway altera plunging okay you didn't mention well you're coming back here thought which is you know there was some discussion yesterday and whether he could be charged when he got out of office right and one does wonder what's happening up in New York that would be a normal jurisdiction for that to happen so you know all of this might just sort of be a way to say he's got to be held accountable when the hardest way but the way that's most important is that the coming election and it's frustrating I think that we didn't hear any of the major candidates yesterday remark on the ceiling two yeah none of whom said we second this is the guy who killed said scire Muller this is a guy who told people to lie and he's still somebody you're considering this is a guy who cozied up to the Russians welcome their information I just thought there was a huge irony when the Republicans were saying exoneration doesn't mean anything what was the president himself will interject at that so I nobody called him on the double speak they came after the hearing yeah and I I was very disappointed the democratic candidates because if they want to become president they will also be the head of the Democratic Party and so it's time for them to show that sort of leadership capability but in your comments you did remind me of what I had forgotten to say and it is important and it is bill bar bill bars the Attorney General of the United States and I suspect that he is somebody who can more readily more easily should he choose to obstruct investigations obstruct justice when it comes to president trump including those investigations are happening in federal courts outside of Washington DC how much should we be concerned about what bill bar is doing behind the scenes I am I'm actually very concerned you know when he first came into office I thought well you know he's career he is going to be loyal to doing what's right I don't have that same confidence anymore the what I'm most worried about is the investigation into the steel dossier in the beginning of the investigation I wanted to if you want to play politics he could twist that right against the Democrats and that would be much more damaging than anything that's happened up to now I think that's what they're attempting and there's another thing too and that also relates to some of what you were talking about when the president leaves office and and it Robert Muller made this clear yesterday certainly you can pursue criminal charges against him when he's no longer president except for the statute of limitations and he did not have an answer to that question the LC memo really didn't adequately address that so what does happen doesn't doesn't that by abiding by the LC terms you're assuming the president's only going to serve one term in office and otherwise if he's reelected is above the law well I think that's right I mean this all comes down to the election because I don't agree that that somehow and you told the time while he's in office if he gets a second term he's never going to be prosecuted and that's just a clear message that maybe has to go out to the public yeah I think I think that's absolutely true and I really appreciate you bringing that up listen let's get a one quick call here from one of our listeners before we go this is Lee calling from San Jose Lee welcome to KGO your own with Laurie Levenson go ahead that's wonderful I called the other day and I was very upset I read Gibbons decline and fall of the Roman Empire I could just about Roman history yeah are it and Bob and Cicero on duty right okay yes I'm scared but was just sort of had a scared chopped off are you are you we're gonna take Donald Trump to the guillotine no no well what's your question professor Levinson there's money and power yeah and and the thing is it is but err I will I used to be in touch with senator Robert Bork yes and we were we were to change letters in mail right yeah and he wrote losing America and that was when bush was president right so do you have a question for professor Levinson because I have limited time with her right now only no I understand I'm sorry it's okay I mean I I would like to respond to him yes please thank you Sir thank you Sir for realizing that what we face now is something that we've been warned about for centuries and then it comes down some of those basic values I think when Adam yes didn't get into the details but he got into what is at stake here as you mentioned before that really is what's at stake it's not about an individual prosecution it's not about an individual count it's not about about an element of the crime it's about the really big pictures and a threat to democracy so I don't mean to be overly dramatic but I think you're right on the spot I think we're being unduly dramatic at this point I mean it is turned into what some people view is a political game and the stakes as you said are so much higher than that we all need to pay attention and I do believe that Congress has to do its duty under the constitution and so do we as citizens we have to clamor for the kind of for the Congress to do its job and for the president to not be above the law and unless we do that man we set a precedent that I think it's scary you know I heard somebody that I respect tremendously yesterday he was actually in studio with me he's one of my colleagues and he said I'm opposed to impeachment Pat I'm opposed to impeach with because it overthrows the will of the people and I boggles my mind as well is it ever appropriate then because anytime you impeach an elected representative you're gonna overthrow the will of the people but there's a reason for it well you know I think that what we've learned is impeachment and politics can I like law a lot because it's a lot more certain were in really uncertain times thank you for having me on and thank you so much so it's been a pleasure talking with you eighty eighty a tennis or telephone number will come back with your telephone calls as we talk about the aftermath of the molar testimony and where do you think we go from here will the Democrats do you think by pursuing impeachment inquiry will they begin the hearings the hearings which really will allow them to get more witnesses and more information because the courts are going to be tilted toward what the Congress is asking for when what they are asking for is part and parcel of an impeachment investigation which is which is entirely within the purview of the Congress eighty eighty eight ten is the

Robert Muller Laurie Levenson Laurie Levenso Loyola Law School Professor Of Law
"bob muller" Discussed on KTRH

KTRH

05:02 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on KTRH

"Stops neither do we be glad to know this is news radio seven Katie our age yeah so the leaked memo from manta from my Nancy Pelosi to a congressional Democrats who are gonna be questioning Bob Muller today in the Judiciary Committee and the Intel committee she sent a six page report to them so that they would all be on the same page and they were all repeat the same talking points reporter Samantha Jo Roth tweeted this out late last night the talking points from pelo C. six pages of them blame Russia saying quote the Russian government attack to the U. S. elections and trump in his campaign welcome to and sought Russia's help to win that's going to be the talking point from the Democrats they're going to launch their questions into Robert Muller with the predicate that the trump campaign did indeed collude and seek Russia's help to win that election which is exactly the opposite of what the written Muller reports said so they're going to try to literally sit there before Bob Mahler and tell him his report what is wrong and get him to acknowledge and admit his report is wrong that's why that memo that I told you about moments ago is so important the memo that Attorney General William Barr sent to Bob Muller saying you will come find your answers to the four corners of your written report which William are excuse me up Bob Muller requested because he does not want to have to go outside the boundaries of that report and that's exactly what the Democrats are a planned it to get him to do Adam Schiff has made a statement saying we will absolutely not limit our questions and demand answers that are within the boundaries of that report Adam Schiff is said we don't recognize the D. O. J.'s authority on this telling MSNBC yesterday quotes we don't recognize that limit limitation at all and what's more they don't recognize that limitation they say it's well established DOJ policy that the prosecutor can't talk about this or the department doesn't comment on people not indicted tell that to build bar if the Attorney General ignores the OJ policy then how does he have any right to ask Bob Muller or anyone else about anyone else to follow this policy when it's not a policy at all so the Democrats plan to ask Bob Muller to say things that he has not already said in his report and to this is where it becomes very very dangerous ground today to speculate they're gonna ask Bob Muller not to speak in the facts they be uncovered and put in his report but to speculate as to whether or not Donald Trump may have tried to obstruct so this is not testimony this is just gossip that what that's well said that's very well said yes that's that's that's precisely what it sounds like Mahler only wants that's why did want to be there today he knew what this was going to be he knew full well the Democrats are going to try to get him to change his report to say something publicly in this testimony that is a little bit different than what is reported in essentially that would invalidate the report if you share the goal here is clear if they have the report that says one thing that was submitted to the DOJ by the special counsel the final in full report but then he contradicts that report in any way when he gets trapped in questioning by the Democrats then that will be thrown into flocks now we have public statements to say one thing a public report that says another thing that means we can't trust any of and guess what that means they get to start all over they could start all over and say now we have new questions about pollution it isn't a Donald Trump wasn't clear after all because the man who wrote the report isn't sure we got him to say he wasn't sure in some question or another during this thing so yes it's gossip it's a show trial and it's going to be an attempt to trap Bob Muller into saying something a little bit different than what the written report says that's why Muller demi end date or not demanded the requested from Bob bill bar that letter that says you can't say anything you didn't say in the report because he doesn't want to have that conflict there the to be a public statement may Hey Bob from from the wrist written statement yes another take on this though this also opens the door to let Republicans ask anything they want yes it does now a if if Dick only to the report then what kind of questions to the Republicans acid didn't pertain to what's already there in the report so why not do it for them to yeah it does but I think the Republicans are perfectly happy to stick to the report because the report cleared the president the report cleared the president on collusion and did not have anything that was enough to charge or indict the president with a common instruction so the president the Republicans would be perfectly happy to just repeat the report president's clear president's team is clear let's move on and get on with the business of running the country so it's going to be explosive I really believe that it's five twenty eight my apologies Cordy.

Nancy Pelosi Bob Muller Judiciary Committee Katie
Attorney General William Barr says Robert Mueller asked DOJ for guidance on testimony limits

Red Eye Radio

05:48 min | 2 years ago

Attorney General William Barr says Robert Mueller asked DOJ for guidance on testimony limits

"Over in the states Mahler's five our testimony today here is the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee Jerrold Nadler no he does not have to comply with that lady doesn't work for them and that letter asks things that are there to be on the beach the power of the of the agency to ask even if he still work for them seems that nobody neither side knows what really is going on here on that particular point from Jerrold Nadler one of the new developments in the molar testimony is the fact that the story had come out where borrow the William Barr the Attorney General had sent Robert Muller a letter showing what the boundaries were of his testimony and it was assumed that bar send the letter which he did but what we found out yesterday was according to Robert Muller that it should be according to William Barr Robert Muller requested to the guidance from the department of justice Attorney General bill Barr told fox news on Tuesday but it was former special counsel Robert Muller Steen who asked the justice department to send Muller letter telling him to keep his upcoming testimony the house lawmakers within the boundaries of the public version of his Russia probe report the letter provoked criticism from Democrats you just heard some right there from Jerrold Nadler who also called it incredibly error again asked by fox news why the Monday letter was sent Barr said Muller staff as the department for guidance at his press conference Bob referring to Bob Muller Robert Muller had said this is a quote here at his press conference Bob and said that he intended to stick with the public reported not go beyond that are said in an interview and in conversations with the department his staff was reiterating that that was their position and they asked us for guidance in writing to explain or tell them what our position was so we're responded in writing the department sent the guidance that they had requested end of quote asked directly if it was mother who asked for the latter bar would plied yes the letter said by the way she should you testify the department understands the testimony regarding the work of the special counsel's office will be governed by the terms you outlined on may twenty ninth specifically that the information you discuss during your testimony appears in and does not go beyond the public version of your March twenty second two thousand nineteen report to the Attorney General or your may twenty ninth public statement end of quote speaking of fox news bar also hit back at Nadler who during a CNN interview called the letter incredibly error again for trying to instruct Mahler what to say Barr said quote he was misinformed as to the facts now that does show something it shows that Robert Muller apparently if that's the way the whole thing went down Robert Muller apparently wants that out that he can refer to over and over and over and over again wells with your request letter except the whole of the letter and say this is the official written guidance that we have gotten or you submit it if you have an opening statement you submit that with your opening statement and say requested the guidance here's a guide so we got back and then you raise it if you need it is that were Miller's going I don't know is that a possibility as to why you ask for of course it is I'm the other thing is that the reason I said that the Republicans know what's going on is because president trump on Tuesday blasted the house judiciary committee's decision to let former special counsel Robert Muller stop aid on the Russia investigation accompany him during his testimony before house lawmakers on Wednesday the skin from fox news he requested that Erin's doubly his former chief of staff and top aid be at the witness table during testimony fox news has told the intelligence committee will swear Sibley N. before sharing now will they ask him direct questions or will Mahler just referred to him if there's something that he's not clear on and therefore he will answer at that particular point I don't know from derided decision as unfair and a disgrace to our system hi a source close to Mahler told foxnews Erin simply was the deputy special counsel and had day to day oversight of the investigation conducted by the office he will accompany special counsel Mahler to Wednesday's hearing as was discussed with the committee more than a week ago Republicans have spoken out against a last minute change well they're claiming it wasn't a last minute change well they would know because of the committee was there and that agreement was made was a Republican the room word no Republicans in that room when it was done was it a week ago was that last minute so like I said can it seems to be confusion on on both

Mahler Senate Judiciary Twenty Second
"bob muller" Discussed on KFI AM 640

KFI AM 640

05:04 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on KFI AM 640

"And Bob Muller said listen that's my report and I'm sticking to it I'm not gonna go outside the scope of that report well we'll see how things go tomorrow when he testifies before the Judiciary Committee and the intelligence committee Serena Marshall is joining us from Washington reporting for ABC news and for KFI and Serena how does this change if he can bring his one of his deputies along with him Mister Saunders Jason Kerry that are going on up here on Capitol Hill at the new developments Miller has asked members of both committees not to bring his deputy Erin doubly with him to appear but to have Aaron doubly appear as a witness that means he would be sworn in to both of those committees and they would be allowed to ask him questions now there are the the committees themselves aren't sure if they're going to allow that at this time because they warranted it's kind of a curve ball if you well because they were planning on being able to ask him questions the only direct questions to Robert Muller so that is in a good situation that is still on going on here on Capitol Hill it's just about love where are we like twenty hours away no fifteen hours map isn't my strong suit and this I I would think that Democrats would like this because Bob Miller has said as we've talked about yesterday to it has said that he won't deviate from that from that report that is already in the hands of Americans in Congress at but this guy seems like he's a bit of a wild card that maybe he could opine further about things that are in the report and that's the question that's why they haven't agreed yet if they'll let him come up and be sworn in it seems at this moment are leaning toward allowing him to come up and be at the witness stand at the council but council aren't often sworn in so in that case our mother to confer with him before answering a question but you're right he didn't make that declaration but we do know the department of justice I did write a letter to Mahler telling him yesterday to stick only to his report as he said he was now is it along those lines sticking to his report Republicans have said they're going to ask about the origins of the investigation the origins of for example the FISA warrant on Carter page was there enough reference to that in that report we're we're that would actually come out where they're gonna talk about that at all or with the above Bob Miller say listen I'm only here to talk about the report itself there definitely was the background information of how it came to be as part of the report I mean we already know some of these this information it was in twenty thirteen that Carter page was first approached by Russian national in the FBI had later I used to be a common spy and he was secretly recorded in April of twenty thirteen talking with another accused by about efforts to recruit pages an intelligence source so we know how some of this background came to be and how it how it perpetuated but that is a good question of whether or not Republicans will trying get Miller to deviate remember Mahler is used to being on Capitol Hill he's his band before committees more than eighty times in his tenure at as being in the government that's as many as as most if not more than most people have ever testified before Congress he's one of the most experienced when the disease experienced prosecutor so this is going to be hard for him as a fairly especially someone who is prepared as much as he has in fact his spokesperson told us he's been preparing for weeks even with members of the former special counsels team yeah he's been preparing for weeks we found out the Democrats are going to go through their clothes locked door yeah come on that's can't be very fun to sit through but it also I you know the Republican war room preparing for this tooth so both sides are getting gearing up for Muller day tomorrow all right well happy Muller eve Teo Serena I don't think of it as exciting as Christmas I think that we've done with all our cake tomorrow and a delivery now you guys the last thing I want is a cake with Bob Miller's by god it wouldn't be the only one I guarantee ari Serena thank you when we come back we're gonna talk a little bit more about the budget deal that was reached because it looks like there will be no shut down at least not anytime soon and what we can expect in this debate coming up a week from today edge of your seat but Kamel Harris and Cory Booker are gonna tag team on Joe Biden when it comes to his nineteen ninety four crime bill thank you for that visual Gary Indiana and Joe Biden wrestling tights yeah trying to fend off both the Cory Booker Anna Kamel Harris Joe Kwan has the latest three people have been charged for a fight a Disney land that was caught on video and went viral a man from Las Vegas and a sister who's from Compton are accused along with the woman's husband health officials in Costa Rica say nineteen people have died from counterfeit alcohol poisoned with math at all government officials confiscated about thirty thousand bottles of bootleg liquor over the weekend north Korean state media reports.

Bob Muller Judiciary Committee fifteen hours twenty hours
"bob muller" Discussed on KQED Radio

KQED Radio

04:19 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on KQED Radio

"Now Bob Muller is too much of a gentleman and an institution list of talk that way. So I will say it for him. But I think what he wanted to get across is that he felt he could not. Opine on whether the president should be indicted that he could not indict a sitting president. And he sure as hell didn't expect someone to airdrop in and do so for him and exonerate, the president when he found that he could not be exonerated. And I think he wanted to underscore that for the country, less there, be any confusion on that point that if he thought the evidence supported exoneration, he would have said, so and he did not. And he did not expect someone who wrote a nineteen page legal diatribe, even before he was familiar with the facts to come in an aggregate to himself, that decision, he intended to leave the consequences to congress. Now, I want to say there are few things that I don't agree with Bob Muller on one of the more significant is his statement that to indict a sitting president is unconstitutional. Now he said that. He said that as, if you could read in a certain article in the constitution where it says thou shalt, not indicted Singh. President, of course, the constitution doesn't say anything of the kind all that. Bob Muller is going by is an opinion of certain lawyers who occupied a certain office of legal counsel at certain times in the past, that's it a few lawyers who are not judges who are not supreme court interpreters of the constitution who derived their analysis of what is implied in the constitution and reach that conclusion. So when he says, quite matter of factly. It's unconstitutional. I think that grossly, not only oversimplifies the matter. But I think it's the matter, Ron. Indeed during Watergate, when there was an opinion to that effect Leon warshafsky the prosecutor, then in an argument over whether Spiro Agnew could be indicted, when the defense when Agnew's defense made the point, you can't indict the vice prices any more than you can date the president. He said you can indict the president. So Joe Warsi disagreed with the office of legal counsel. So I think that oh, L C logic is flawed. Now. I will say this. If you accept the logic of the opinion. It does follow as Bob Muller argued that if you can't indict a sitting president, because the president would not be able to clear, their name, even if you abstain from the prosecution until they left office, the president would not be able to clear their name until they did leave office. It does follow that you shouldn't say, but for that policy, you would have indicted, because then you're doing the same thing you're casting, the same stigma now from my point of view. One of the flaws in the opinion is that wear by operation of the statute of limitations president can escape Justice that factor ways much more heavily than what stigma might be applied by indicting a sitting president into laying prosecution. But nonetheless, if you follow the logic of the oil, c- opinion, it does lead you to that conclusion, and therefore I find it completely disingenuous. Of Bill bar to say, no Muller could have decided and could have said the president should be indicted. I guarantee you had Bob Muller come to Bill bar and said, I'm going to nonce that he should be indicted. He would have had a real fight on his hands. If Bill bar believes that Bob Muller was completely free to pine on whether the president should be dated, even though he couldn't actually indict him, then I guess the southern district of New York should be free to say the president should be indicted..

president Bob Muller Bill bar legal counsel Spiro Agnew Joe Warsi Ron Singh Leon New York prosecutor
House Democrat says support lacking for Trump impeachment inquiry

The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer

03:43 min | 2 years ago

House Democrat says support lacking for Trump impeachment inquiry

"Jerry Nadler, here in the situation room, just moments ago, telling me and I'm quoting him, now, it may very well, come to a formal impeachment inquiry. Let's get some reaction from our political and legal experts, and Gloria borger. What do you think he's, he's holding out that possibility? Very clearly, but he doesn't seem in any rush. You know, he he says it might come to that. But not so fast. I think he's in the Nancy Pelosi school here. How it'll end that is I'm gonna try and get people before my committee. He said to you. It's important that Bob Muller testifies. He thinks he's a public servant he thinks he's going to be able to get them to testify publicly because that is what they want important for the for the American public to hear what he has to say because not everyone has read the Muller report is imported out. So I think what he's saying to you is one foot in front of the other, and we're not going to be pushed into this. But first, we have to tell the story to the American public new also make clear. He wants to make sure that. There's a consensus among the democratic leadership that he and Nancy Pelosi the speaker on the same page. That's right in one of the things that he said, was at this point. There's just not the support in his caucus. Their course or this very vocal minority of folks who do one and peach man inquiry do one. I'm peach mate charges file, but they're not enough of them yet. We'll see how this goes day by day they're doing. They do seem to be louder and they do seem to be more of them. But I was just sort of struck by Jerry Nadler's basic tone. I mean, there was no sense of urgency really. If you've certainly compare him to what we hear from progressives in the folks, you really want to March and worth impeachment. He was very measured almost diffident in terms of where they stand right now in terms of this impeachment incudes interested. Bionic is nearly half of the Democrats on the judiciary committee want to begin some sort of formal impeachment proceeding, fifty nine Democrats in the house out of two hundred and thirty five want to do so, so it's not it's not happening yet. Well, and he made. They have been addressing some of their concerns by seemingly stating that what they're doing. Now is not so different from an inquiry. He said, they're just maybe a few levels of the process that would be different. If in fact, they did launch an official inquiry, but he made it seem I agree with the panel as if they are making inroads, and they are continuing to do the work that they are focusing on right now. Now what did stand out, and maybe it was just an oversight. But you specifically asked him if he was on the same page with Nancy Pelosi. He didn't say, yes, he also didn't say, no, but, but he did say, you know, if if that's what it'll take, we will get there. We're not there yet, but it didn't give you a yes or no definitive answer. Also from the legal standpoint, allure coats, would it make much of a difference in obtaining documents from the administration in getting witnesses to appear before the committee if there was a formal formal proceeding underweight as opposed to the informal employee that's going on. Well, yes, I mean the participator prosperity saying they've done their nose at it. Can. Continuously because they have to rely on the court to kind of enforce it and hope that the courts will say, there's no good legislative reason to have this and kind of dismiss it. But in reality, the impeachment inquiry, gives a great deal more power. They don't have to have legislative purpose as their basis. That is the constitutional purpose. That's there also opens the floodgates you don't have to the rule, sixty there have to think about the notions of whether or not they have to have is an oversight function alone. Is it tied enough? They need all these details for legislation. They could simply say, look the constitution guarantees the right to have oversight and accountability in the executive branch of government. We're doing just that. So it does open more avenues. But remember again, as we're all saying, this is the political process and political processes, don't have the same level of common sense, perhaps, as the judicial process going

Jerry Nadler Judiciary Committee Nancy Pelosi Bob Muller Gloria Borger Nancy Pelosi School Executive Underweight Official One Foot
"bob muller" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

06:39 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"We've heard from Democrats in the media ever since the one person we haven't heard her should say, a person, we haven't heard from is somebody to take the president side, other than me. Offer that to you now on Fox News yesterday. Former congressman, Trey Goudy did his very best to point out the obvious that I've been doing this morning, and that is there is not a prosecutable case against Donald Trump. Cut seventeen. Yeah, couple of evidentiary thresholds may takes probable cause to indict someone or arrest them, but it takes beyond a reasonable doubt to get a conviction and most prosecutors. If you don't have a realistic, likelihood of a successful outcome. You're not gonna try to case so you can have probable cause you could get an indictment. You could get interest war. But you got no chance of winning. I don't know where this falls in the evidently, I think it's above no evidence, but whether or not it's enough to of indicted. Look, I'll listen everywhere of his press conference. I still don't know whether or not he would have died, but for that. Oh, L C opinion, that discrepancy, people are pointing to between what Bill Barr had said, Miller told him Muller said today that, that was the stumbling block walked for him on destruction. I'm still not clear, whether that I don't know this is one of the president's options, and I'm not his lawyer not ever going to be as lawyer. But you know, you can wave any right? You have Dana, you have the right to remain silent, but you can talk to the police, if you want to you have a right to a jury trial, but you can plead guilty if you want to I'll bet the president has the right to say, go ahead and me if you have enough of the supreme court's never said that I can't be indicted, this DOJ. I'm the head of the O J. I run the executive branch. If you have enough to indict me, go ahead and do it. At least you have some clarity, what you're going to have now for the next fourteen months is an impeachment investigation by folks who've already made up their mind. Sixty of them wanted to impeach him before Muller wrote a single syllable of his report, the jury's never gonna convicting, so we're going to be in this state of chaos for the next fourteen months. Because the problem is we don't need to be in that state of chaos. Because as conflicting as Muller was in his statement yesterday, which a lot of that contradicted, what he wrote in the actual report, the one thing that cannot be misunderstood or misconstrued is that he said, we have insufficient evidence. Insufficient evidence to support a conspiracy charge not enough evidence to even charge him. I e indict him and then insufficient evidence to prove that he obstructed Justice. The only thing that makes it confusing is that he reversed it instead insufficient evidence to prove didn't obstruct Justice, no court of law in the history of this country to my knowledge has ever brought a case for her to case, rather, when somebody was just accused of not being able to prove they didn't do something as I said before his plane as it is to say I used myself I use Muller now. Bob Muller might be a murderer. Bob Muller might be a murderer. Now, I don't have any evidence to say that he is. But he hasn't shown any evidence to say that he's not. And since Bob Muller hasn't display giving me any evidence to prove he's not a murderer. If you wanna consider him one, you can do that. Justifiably now. That's insane. Right. That would be highly irresponsible of me if I meant that, and if I wasn't using it as an example, but that's what he's doing to the president. Donald trump. We don't have any evidence of struck to Justice, but we don't have any evidence that he did didn't obstruct Justice, so you can go out and assume that he did. That's not how the system works. Let's go to Winston Salem North Carolina. And that's where we find gray on the Hugh Hewitt Show gray spots, sitting in for Hugh go right ahead. Hey, bob. Thank you, a quick thing. Bob Muller might be a conspiracy guilty of conspiracy after the fact for murder when you consider tenure in Boston as head of that office there and their whole entanglement with Whitey Bulger, but that's a whole different story. That's not why I called to say that. I think Bob Muller is a petulant child what he really wanted was to get an interview with the president, so he could charge him with false statements with except for metaphor. Gates and Cohen. All the people who are in Trump orbit, who were charged with we're all charts, making false statements, and I heard a long form interview with him at flood in Byron York. And Emmett flood said that, that Bob or kept asking for an interview. Review with the president, and, and Emmett flood said, why we give everything he said, Bill free this being, but that will not that will not last you will not get that to prevail in court. And if you recall when Bill Clinton was under investigation by a different law, but especially council nonetheless, they did subpoena the president sitting president, what the peanut in all the subpoena was withdrawn it led to an interview in front of a federal judge, where Bill Clinton lied and was was was held accountable for perjury and lost all like five years and paid us -nificant fine. So they really just wanted to trap him but but, but Trump lawyers did a masterful job, Trump one. This is a complete exoneration. And he looked like a sad. But that it man don't call him Robert anymore either. He's bob. Well, I'll be calling him Bob Muller from the very beginning. You, you, you, you said a mouthful there, and, and the most important word that you said there was trap. That's what was trying to do. It's why he wanted Trump to sit down with them into why thank goodness, the president has attorneys were wise enough to counsel them to not sit down with him because it was going to be a perjury trap. We all know how this works. It's been covered ad nauseam. You get a prosecutor sitting down with a witness who especially defendant, or, you know, somebody who is suspected of committing a crime in this investigation. The defendant does not know what the prosecutor knows. So the prosecutor can very easily ask questions or of the witness that he already knows the answer to the witness does not know if the is even just remembers it incorrectly. It can be construed as perjury. You said something that's not true. Well, not intentional. You ask me about something from, you know, years ago that I do not recall, as well as you do you already have the that's why they call it a perjury trap. And that's why. And that's why jaysekulow and Rudy Giuliani. And his attorneys told him not to sit down on told the president of the United States is speaking live now to reporters on the tarmac. Let's go live to the president..

Bob Muller president Donald Trump perjury prosecutor Fox News Trump Bill Clinton Trey Goudy congressman Bill Barr DOJ Emmett flood Rudy Giuliani United States Whitey Bulger executive Winston Salem North Carolina Hugh
"bob muller" Discussed on WDRC

WDRC

02:54 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on WDRC

"Off. And of course, Bob Muller was not in charge of indicting, the attorney general makes that judgment call. So Bob Muller was taking the easy way out by saying, well, you know, I. Couldn't even tell my boss whether or not I thought the president was guilty or not. So therefore, I'm not going to say that he was guilty. It would be unfair of me to cast a shadow on somebody who doesn't have the opportunity to go to court and clear his name, so all cast shadow on President Trump anyway. And then claim I couldn't reach a conclusion, apparently he and his boss did not agree on that matter, by the way, be careful what you share on social media, because you never know when somebody does something could come back and ruin your life, but should showing off your firearm be one of those scenarios will tell you the story running a political campaign can be long and expensive, but imagine having to do it not once but twice coming up later on this hour, I'll talk about why Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is going to have to run us nother set of elections coming up in September, so that they can form government in Israel people act differently when they know they're being filmed or videoed. So should the cops be allowed to turn their body cameras both on and off will? Discuss that as well and take a moment to cast vote. My Twitter poll you'll find a brand new question each and every night we've put it on the website at LARs Larson dot com. Also on Twitter out, LARs Larson show should men, get an equal amount of parental leave as women. My personal opinion is that I think if you're having a child, that is a wonderful thing to do. I also think you should take time off with your child. And I also think that you and your husband, your spouse, or your wife and husband should pay the cost of taking time off, I do not think it should be paid by your fellow co workers at the place where you work, I don't think it should be paid for by your company. It is the kind of benefit that only extends to a certain number of people, and I fully endorse those conservative couples out there who've made financial plan, so that they can take the time off to be with their child and pay the cost themselves after all you're the ones who decided to become parents were glad that you did. But now the time off should be your decision. And your expense, not that of your co workers, the company you work for I'm gonna take some calls from you, and we'll get some of those other stories in just a moment. Let's go first. Nathan in Virginia a Nathan, thanks listing. WCHS v. What's on your mind on this conspiracy theory Thursday night? I wanna talk about unions actually okay, we've had that come up a couple of times what your take? The union conservative party conservative, and I'm actually it's conservative that I feel like Republicans. Not uncommon. The most people wanna call me an extreme conservative, but it's not extreme to believe in the United States of America, noting else..

Bob Muller Twitter president Trump LARs Larson Nathan WCHS Prime Minister Benjamin Netany attorney United States Israel Virginia America
"bob muller" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK

NewsRadio KFBK

02:45 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on NewsRadio KFBK

"Bob Muller has told us, and I, I would suggest that what he is also telling us is okay now congress is going to have to do its job, Senator Harris, spoke to a crowd in Greenville, where she hosted a woman's meet-and-greet. It's her sixth trip to South Carolina, since announcing her bid for the democratic nomination, she has been endorsed by three prominent women leaders in that state. You don't know the top business leader in America is one against the longterm implications of the escalate. Trade war between the US and China. This is former sun. Microsystems CEO, Scott mcnealy, he is our featured audio clip in this hour. He says he believes that the trade war between China and the United States is long from over. He says this has been brewing for a long time and we are just at the beginning. Here's what he told CNBC at this point now, the administration has said enough is enough. We're not going to just keep our hands tied behind our back. This isn't going to be an open market to China if they're not going to open their market. And no one, I would argue that the Chinese market is one of the most open markets in the world. It just isn't. So there's gonna be a big battle and China's big. Now they are now past apple in terms of, of phones are shipping, and they predict that this year or next. They will be though pass Samsung as the largest supplier of cellphones, Z T, and wow. We have about forty percent of the mobile acquit marketplace out there and they're growing faster. There's going to be a real challenge here for the US and. Pre-market companies to compete for the rest of the world. Marketplace versus China who's competing for the rest of the world marketplace. And all these key technology, Christina Scott mcnealy joins a chorus of business leaders across the country who are warning about longterm implications of an escalating trade war between the US and China. We heard from Ken Langone earlier. He's the co founder of Home Depot. He essentially said the same thing echoed, exactly what we just heard from mcnealy. Well, I think the big question is, and it's a question I don't I, I don't think has been answered is is it too late to do this? I mean, should should we have done this with China should we have demanded more equality in trade agreements to twenty years ago before they were big power, because maybe China's like we don't need you anymore. I've listened to a lot of these audio clips that the rest of Europe, I would I would have to say, I do think there's buyer's remorse. I mean, I'm getting the sense from the business leaders in this country that they all believe this should have been done a lot sooner. We waited too long just like you. At least two indicated there. Right. So that and that is the question because. Obviously you'd like to think China needs us as much as we need them. But the question is, do they really an the answer is I don't know that we know. Yeah. I don't think we're hearing from all kinds of business leaders that are on all sides of the issue. I don't think they know either. All right. Let's get you caught up on this hour's top national stories on news ninety three point one. K F B can..

China apple Scott mcnealy United States Ken Langone South Carolina Bob Muller Greenville congress Senator Harris America CNBC CEO Samsung Europe Home Depot forty percent twenty years
"bob muller" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

860AM The Answer

06:41 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on 860AM The Answer

"Everything that we heard yesterday from Bob Muller and everything we've heard from Democrats in the media ever since. The one person we haven't heard her should say a person, we haven't heard from is somebody to take the president side, other than me. Offer that to you now on Fox News yesterday. Former congressman, Trey Goudy did his very best to point out the obvious that I've been doing this morning, and that is there is not a prosecutable case against Donald Trump. Cut seventeen. Couple of evidence, thresholds may takes probable cause to indict someone or arrest them, but it takes beyond a reasonable doubt to get a conviction and most prosecutors. If you don't have a realistic, likelihood of a successful outcome. You're not gonna try to case so you can have probable cause you could get an indictment. You could get interest war. But you got no chance of winning. I don't know where this falls in the evidence Sherie. I think it's above no evidence, but whether or not it's enough to of indicted, look, I'll listen every war press conference us still don't know whether or not he would've indicted but for that. Oh, L C opinion, that discrepancy, and people are pointing to between what Bill Barr had said, Miller told him what Muller said today that, that was the some blame Bach walk for him on structure. I'm still not clear, whether that I don't know. This is one of the president's options, and I'm not his lawyer not ever going to be as lawyer. But you know, you can wave any right? You have Dana, you have the right to remain silent, but you can talk to the police, if you want to you have a right to a jury trial, but you can plead guilty if you want to I'll bet the president has the right to say, go ahead and me if you have enough of the supreme court's never said that. I can't diet, this DOJ. I'm the head of the O J. I run the executive branch if you have enough to indict me go ahead and do it. At least you have some clarity, what you're going to have now for the next fourteen months is an impeachment investigation by folks, who have already made up their mind. Sixty of them wanted to impeach him before Muller wrote a single syllable of his report, the jury's never gonna convict convicting, so we're going to be in this state of chaos for the next fourteen months once, because the problem is we don't need to be in that state of chaos. Because as conflicting as Muller was in his. Statement yesterday which a lot of that contradicted what he wrote in the actual report, the one thing that cannot be misunderstood or misconstrued is that he said, we have insufficient evidence. Insufficient evidence to support a conspiracy charge not enough evidence to even charge him. I e indict him and then insufficient evidence to prove that he obstructed Justice. The only thing that makes it confusing is that he reversed it instead insufficient evidence to prove didn't obstruct Justice, no court of law in the history of this country to my knowledge has ever brought a case for her a case, rather, when somebody was just accused of not being able to prove they didn't do something as I said before his plane as it is to say I used myself I use Muller now. Bob Muller might be a murderer. Bob Muller might be a murderer. Now, I don't have any evidence to say that he is. But he hasn't shown any evidence to say that he's not. And since Bob Muller hasn't display giving me any evidence to prove he's not a murderer. If you wanna consider him one, you can do that. Justifiably now. That's insane. Right. That would be highly irresponsible of me if I meant that, and if I wasn't using it as an example, but that's what he's doing to the president. Donald trump. We don't have any evidence of struck to Justice, but we don't have any evidence that he did didn't obstruct Justice, so you can go out and assume that he did. That's not how the system works. Let's go to Winston Salem North Carolina. And that's where we find gray on the Hugh Hewitt Show, graves Bob sitting in for Hugh go right ahead. Hey, bob. Thank you. A quick thing. Bob, Bob Muller might be a conspiracy guilty of conspiracy after the fact for murder when you consider tenure in Boston, head of that Beav office there and their whole entanglement with Whitey Bulger. But that's a whole different story. That's not why I called to say that. I think Bob Muller is a child, what he really wanted was to get an interview with the president, so he could charge him with false statements with except for metaphor. Gates and Cohen. All the people who are in Trump orbit, who were charged with things were all charge, and making false statements. And I heard a long form interview with flood in Byron York, and would that, that, that Bob or kept asking for an interview. Review with the president, and Emmett flood said, why we give everything he said, Bill, free opinion. But that will not that will not last you will not get that to prevail in court. And if you recall when Bill Clinton was under investigation by a different law, but especially council nonetheless, they did subpoena. The president sitting president was peanut, and all those Pena was withdrawn it led to an interview in front of a federal judge. We're Bill Clinton lied and was was was held accountable for perjury and lost all like five years, and pay -nificant fine. So they really just wanted to trap him but, but Trump lawyers did a masterful job, Trump won complete exoneration. And he looked like a sad. But that it man don't call them Robert anymore either. Bob. Well, I'll be calling him Bob Muller from the very beginning. You said a mouthful there, and, and the most important word that you said there was trap. That's what we're trying to do. It's why he wanted Trump to sit down with them into why thank goodness, the president has attorneys were wise enough to counsel them to not sit down with him because it was going to be a perjury trap. We all know how this works. It's been covered ad nauseam. You get a prosecutor sitting down with a witness who especially defendant, or, you know, somebody who is suspected of committing a crime in this investigation. The defendant does not know what the prosecutor knows. So the prosecutor can very easily ask questions or of the witness that he already knows the answer to the witness does not know if the win this even just remembers it incorrectly. It can be construed as perjury. You said something that's not true. Well, not intentional. You ask me about something from years ago that I do not recall, as well as you do you already have the that's why they call it a perjury trap. And that's why. And that's why jaysekulow Giuliani and his attorneys told him not to sit down. I'm told the president of the United States is speaking live now to reporters on the tarmac. Let's go live to the president..

Bob Muller president Donald Trump perjury Fox News Trump Bill Clinton DOJ Trey Goudy congressman prosecutor Bill Barr jaysekulow Giuliani United States Dana executive Winston Salem North Carolina Whitey Bulger Bill
'I Don't Do Cover-Ups': Trump Storms Out of Meeting with Democrats

America Trends

03:25 min | 2 years ago

'I Don't Do Cover-Ups': Trump Storms Out of Meeting with Democrats

"Trending in the news that big face off between President Trump and the democratic leaders, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, again, just minutes after democratic leaders arrive at the White House for a scheduled meeting today on infrastructure, all the attending press were told. Hey, we're inviting you to the rose garden. Now no explanation as to why. Well, the mystery was soon solve turns out, President Trump was upset that the Democrats had had a meeting earlier that day to talk about impeaching him. So earlier this morning before his meeting with them off, they go, you know, he feels like stabbing him in the back or whatever. So he found out last night and had this sort of thing plan where he. He walked in and said, I'm out of here. So some sound now here's what happened. And why Trump says the investigations on him should end country. Companies are moving back in things are going well, and I said, let's have the meeting on infrastructure. We'll get that done easily. That's one of these e ones. And said of walk it in happily into a meeting. I walk into look at people that are just said that I was doing a cover up, I don't do cover up, you people know that probably better than anybody. And I was just looking at a list of some of the things that we just did more than two thousand five hundred subpoenas qualified for, and I let everybody talk, I let the White House counsel, speak for thirty hours thirty hours. I have nineteen special counsel lawyers forty FBI agents. I said, open it all up. Let them have whatever they want nearly five hundred search warrants think of that as search want to give you a search warrant before neither did I this was over five hundred search warrants and of the nineteen people that were heading up this investigation, or whatever you wanna call it with Bob Muller. They were contributors to the democrat party, most of them into Hillary Clinton. They hated President Trump. They hated him with a passion. They went to her big party after the election that turned out to be awake. Not a party was awake and they were very angry. These are the people that after two years, and forty million or thirty five million dollars. Linda being a lot more than that. By the time all the bills paid this is what happened. No collusion. No obstruction. No, nothing. They issued fifty orders authorizing use of pen registers. Think of that, though five hundred witnesses, and then I have dancy Pelosi go out and say that the president of the United States engaged in cover up down, we've had a house investigation. We have sensitive. Instigation. We have investigations like nobody's ever had before. And there's nothing we did nothing wrong. They would have loved to have said, we colluded. They would've loved it. These people were out to get

President Trump White House Nancy Pelosi Chuck Schumer Rose Garden Democrat Party Hillary Clinton Special Counsel FBI Bob Muller United States Linda Dancy Thirty Hours Thirty Five Million Dollars Two Years
'I Don't Do Cover-Ups': Trump Storms Out of Meeting with Democrats

America Trends

03:25 min | 2 years ago

'I Don't Do Cover-Ups': Trump Storms Out of Meeting with Democrats

"Trending in the news that big face off between President Trump and the democratic leaders, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, again, just minutes after democratic leaders arrive at the White House for a scheduled meeting today on infrastructure, all the attending press were told. Hey, we're inviting you to the rose garden. Now no explanation as to why. Well, the mystery was soon solve turns out, President Trump was upset that the Democrats had had a meeting earlier that day to talk about impeaching him. So earlier this morning before his meeting with them off, they go, you know, he feels like stabbing him in the back or whatever. So he found out last night and had this sort of thing plan where he. He walked in and said, I'm out of here. So some sound now here's what happened. And why Trump says the investigations on him should end country. Companies are moving back in things are going well, and I said, let's have the meeting on infrastructure. We'll get that done easily. That's one of these e ones. And said of walk it in happily into a meeting. I walk into look at people that are just said that I was doing a cover up, I don't do cover up, you people know that probably better than anybody. And I was just looking at a list of some of the things that we just did more than two thousand five hundred subpoenas qualified for, and I let everybody talk, I let the White House counsel, speak for thirty hours thirty hours. I have nineteen special counsel lawyers forty FBI agents. I said, open it all up. Let them have whatever they want nearly five hundred search warrants think of that as search want to give you a search warrant before neither did I this was over five hundred search warrants and of the nineteen people that were heading up this investigation, or whatever you wanna call it with Bob Muller. They were contributors to the democrat party, most of them into Hillary Clinton. They hated President Trump. They hated him with a passion. They went to her big party after the election that turned out to be awake. Not a party was awake and they were very angry. These are the people that after two years, and forty million or thirty five million dollars. Linda being a lot more than that. By the time all the bills paid this is what happened. No collusion. No obstruction. No, nothing. They issued fifty orders authorizing use of pen registers. Think of that, though five hundred witnesses, and then I have dancy Pelosi go out and say that the president of the United States engaged in cover up down, we've had a house investigation. We have sensitive. Instigation. We have investigations like nobody's ever had before. And there's nothing we did nothing wrong. They would have loved to have said, we colluded. They would've loved it. These people were out to get

President Trump White House Nancy Pelosi Chuck Schumer Rose Garden Democrat Party Hillary Clinton Special Counsel FBI Bob Muller United States Linda Dancy Thirty Hours Thirty Five Million Dollars Two Years
Nancy Pelosi, Robert Muller And President discussed on Markley and Van Camp

Markley and Van Camp

04:35 min | 2 years ago

Nancy Pelosi, Robert Muller And President discussed on Markley and Van Camp

"Trump, little speech today. Yeah. Not happy. Maybe some political theater going on as President Trump called off a meeting on infrastructure with Democrats barely. He told Chuck and Nancy to go pound sand until these investigations end. Well, they were supposed to have this meeting today. And then he says, I'm I supposed to feel they're talking about I'm, you know, covering stuff up there saying, I'm engaged in a cover up there, saying that potentially I need to be impeached. I mean, here's the president in this last minute rose garden announcement caught everybody off guard. It seems so I came here to do a meeting on infrastructure with Democrats. Not really thinking they wanted to do infrastructure or anything else other than investigate, and I just saw that Nancy Pelosi just before meeting made the statement that we believe that the president of the United States is engaged in a cover-up. Well, it turns out on the most, I think most of you would agree to this. I'm the most transparent president probably in the history of this country and instead of. Walk it in happily into a meeting. I walk into look at people that are just said that I was doing a cover up, I don't do cover ups, you people know that probably better than anybody. I wanna do infrastructure. I want to do it more than you wanna do. I'd be really good at that. That's what I do. But you know what? You can't do it under these circumstances. So get these phony investigations of with get the phony investigations over with quit doing this, 'cause can I work with these people when this keeps going I can understand where he's coming from because if you have if you're really trying to, to meet in the middle how can you have a conversation with somebody like that when they're saying that I mean wh-what Nancy Pelosi say this morning? Not only that he's engaged in a cover up. But I pray for the president of the United States in this whole country. Oh, gosh. When you have the melodrama going on. How are you supposed to actually try to get anything done? When you have people who are acting unreasonably at times, how are we supposed to actually come to the table and negotiate. What is this really about this is about Democrats going to Nancy saying, we got a beach, even though she said, for while this is a bad move. We should not do this, and now you have so many. Crafts, knocking down her door saying, we've got to do this. Nancy, right. And so then she comes out with her statement to fees people, and, yeah, it gets in the way of working together on pretty much anything ask you this. If you are the GOP. And if you are the Republican party is this something you welcome almost? I mean I'm not saying you open the door, but I'm saying is this the worst thing, because isn't this already one of those things that we've decided this one time. And now you want to reboot on the whole investigate. And now aren't the American people are gonna go okay enough already? Yeah. I mean can't this bite you in the tail? Absolutely. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I welcome it impeachment proceeding one. Because if there is, if there is something still somehow that wasn't uncovered by Robert Muller, we should know that. But then also because politically assuming there isn't anything else. It helps Trump, and it helps the Republican party, because they can point and look at the Democrats say even after you had one guy, who's entire existence was centered around investigating this president in Bob Muller. Right. That's all he did for two years. Didn't come up with enough to consider charging the president's apparently and Democrats want the do over it was ridiculous duty rat. Yes, exactly. I mean, here you, are you are charged with a crime. The crime is investigated your vindicated and the prosecution doesn't like the outcome and they want to retry you for the same crime, but it's because there were some very concerning things. And in fact, Robert Muller wasn't going to be the final word on everything. He just left us a roadmap. That's what Democrats are saying. But what did we know Rafter it happened? Okay. There was no collusion obstruction. Well, you may have tried but it didn't succeed. There are people to stop him. And so then you're getting into well, it was not enough for Muller to say yet, we're going to charge him with obstruction. That's up to you bar, and he knew exactly where that was going to go. So how much do you want to say? No. But he dried. Yeah. The cartoon balloon above his head. But I think as far as, you know, Democrats that may play to the base, but you got to have more than the base when you're looking at him the twenty twenty election. We'll see where the whole

Nancy Pelosi Robert Muller President Trump Republican Party United States Chuck Donald Trump GOP Rafter Crafts Two Years
"bob muller" Discussed on WCBM 680 AM

WCBM 680 AM

01:59 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on WCBM 680 AM

"You have the right to remain silent. And you might want to use it. This is the Sean Hannity show. There's no public evidence that the vice-president reverse president took any appropriate action to help his son, but wasn't right for hundred take a job like that in Ukraine while his father was engaged in diplomacy there. I don't know the circumstances in which he took the job. But I can't say this vis-a-vis Joe Biden, there's no evidence has ever been any evidence that he was doing anything, but trying to get the Ukraine government to crack down on corruption. We're providing generous support Ukraine were providing defensive weapons crane. We want Ukraine to be successful in his conflict with Russia. But part of that is having a government that the people of Ukraine are willing to fight for and protect and they've had an endemic corruption problem. That's what Joe Biden was trying to address so going after his son this just a method of going after some of the president believes is his most formidable opponent. So yes. The president go after him, but don't seek the help of a foreign government in your election. And if this isn't criminal and Bob Muller, setting could not prove all the elements of crime. Then maybe we need to change the elements of that crime because we cannot make this the new norm that if you can't win an election on your own it's fine to seek help from a foreign power the president right there. He says you all are gonna let them in twenty twenty. That's not going to happen. And I don't think this country could survive another four years of a president like this who gets up every day trying to find new and inventive ways to divide us. He doesn't seem to understand that a fundamental aspect of job is to try to make us a more perfect union. But that's not at all where he's coming from. And he's going to be defeated. He has to be defeated because I don't know how much more democratic institutions can take this kind of attack on the rule of law. Democrats don't take the bait on impeachment. You said.

president Ukraine Joe Biden Sean Hannity Bob Muller vice-president Russia four years
Showdown looms between Congress and attorney general over Mueller report

ABC World News This Week

03:22 min | 2 years ago

Showdown looms between Congress and attorney general over Mueller report

"It was a week of mounting tension in Washington between the Trump administration and Democrats in congress attorney general William Barr refused to testify Thursday before the House Judiciary committee in his place. An empty chair chairman Jerrold Nadler says if bar does not hand over the unredacted Muller report and its underlying evidence. The attorney general will be held in contempt of congress history will judge us for how we face this challenge. We will all be held accountable. In one way or the other. And if he does not provide this committee with the information at demands and the respect it deserves is the bars moment of accountability will come soon enough. The Justice department objected to Democrats demand that bar take questions from staff attorneys who worked for members of congress. House minority leader Kevin McCarthy defended bars absence, one time has staff question the cabinet level of oil. And that was during the impeachment hearing that same day speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi accused of committing a crime or from ABC's Mona Kosar Abdi on Capitol Hill. House speaker Nancy Pelosi says the attorney general line to congress about his handling of the Malla report. The attorney general of the United States of America was not telling the truth to the congress of the United States. That's a crime below sea. Then accused bar of now being loyal to his oath of office. But rather to the president nobody is above the law. Not the president of the United States and not the attorney General Motors are Aldi ABC news, Capitol Hill. The Justice department called Pelosi's words, reckless irresponsible and false many Democrats want the attorney general to resign are did testify about the mother report Wednesday before the Senate Judiciary committee where he faced tough questions about the Muller letter. ABC's Mary, Bruce, covered it all from the capital just hours before news. Broken Muller had complained to the attorney general about bars decision to release his own summary of the reports conclusions Muller voiced his frustration in a letter to bar on March twenty seventh writing the attorney general summary did not fully capture the context nature and substance of this offices work and conclusions. Adding there is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation, the letters its navy, and I think it was probably written by one of his staff. People Muller wrote his own summaries of the report and twice as Barda released them, but Barr refused. The two men later talked on the phone and bar insists Muller did not accuse him of misrepresenting. The report there were not taken of. Of the call. May we have those notes? No, why not. Why should you have bar new of Muller's concerns when he testified last month, but he didn't reveal them when asked about concerns from the special counsels team members of the special counsel team are frustrated at some level with limited information included in March twenty four th letter that it does not adequately accurately necessarily portray the reports findings do you know what they're referencing with that. No, I don't Democrats demanded to know why he didn't tell them about Muller's letter. You say you were not aware of concerns by answer to question. And the question was relating to unidentified members. I talked directly to Bob Muller. Not members of his team for your

Bob Muller Attorney Muller Congress House Judiciary Committee Nancy Pelosi People Muller United States ABC Justice Department William Barr Jerrold Nadler General Motors Kevin Mccarthy Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Trump Administration Washington
"bob muller" Discussed on WBSM 1420

WBSM 1420

01:54 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on WBSM 1420

"Stun? Cars show. Bob Muller the opportunity to review that letter before it went out and he declined Thursday morning. I received a letter from Bob, and I call Bob, and what's the issue here? I asked him if he was suggesting that the March twenty four th letter was inaccurate. And he said, no, but that the press reporting had been inaccurate. And that the press was reading too much into it. And I asked him specifically what is concerned was? And he said that his concern focused on his explanation of why he did not reach a conclusion on obstruction love from the Matthews brothers studios. Mother stated three times to us in that meeting in response to our questioning that he was not saying that. But for the opinion, he would have found obstruction. We did not understand exactly why the special counsel was not reaching a decision and when we pressed him on. And he said that his team was still formulating the explanation who's your captain Howey. I'm not going to abjure a use of the word spying. I think spying is a good English word, frankly, we went back and looked at press usage and up until all the full outrage a couple of weeks ago. It's commonly used in the press refer to authorize that tippety such as referred. But it is not commonly used by the department. My time commonly used by me unchain stoppable. I think under these circumstances. One of the things that I can't fathom. Why it did not happen? If you're concerned about interference in the election, and you have substantial people involved in the campaign who were former US attorneys who had three former US attorneys there. I don't understand why the bureau would not have gone and given a defensive briefing room swaths axon moon bay where it's Howie Carr. Welcome.

Bob Muller axon moon bay US Howie Carr captain Howey special counsel Matthews
"bob muller" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

04:02 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"It's the title of it by by me. It's almost done with it. But I have a big chapter. I don't know if this is going to be the title yet. But the title of the chapter were working with the working title is what Muller missed basically Muller. Did this whole thing and missed magically Joe Bob Mueller special counsel assigned to investigate Russian collusion. Managed to miss all the big Russian collusion questions. So Kim strassel sums this up in a beautiful piece. Very well done in the Washington, excuse me, Wall Street Journal today title. Her columnist called Potomac watch the Russians and the dossier Muller should have investigated whether Moscow use the'll and its interference. So just to be clear on this Muller's initial charter was to investigate how Russians tried to interfere in our election yet he missed I have a whole chapter on the big questions. He missed. It's going to blow your mind, you're going to be like how could he possibly have missed all the big questions and hit on all the nonsensical stuff. So she writes in the piece, I the first big takeaway will Muller missed that. The former spy note to the public in Russia also be she's talking about steel became known for sending reports to the US govern last year. Former Obama State Department official Jonathan winer explain it two nine he became friendly with steel and this relationship starting as early as twenty thirteen insured that more than one hundred steals reports on Russian topics were shared with the State Department. Hold that for a second. Keep in mind what she's saying here? Bob Muller supposed to investigate Russian collusion in the in the election. Christopher. Deal. We now know according to speed had a working relationship with the State Department going back to two thousand nine providing reports on Russia. She goes on. Given that the dossier is largely based on Russian sources if you watch yesterday's show or listen to it. You know that some supposedly connected to the Kremlin did the Kremlin know about this arrangement and see an opportunity to spoon feed in the US government disinformation, dang designating. Thank you, Kim strassel for so eloquently. Putting into words what you Chuck Ross Jeff Carlson. Others have been asking forever. You watch yesterday's show again where I show you the FIS it and the footnotes. The FBI is already acknowledged that steel sub sources were Russian did the Russians know this that Steele was feeding information to the State Department as early as two thousand nine in the FBI and feed him bogus information. This is the pen head-scratching while the FBI, Bob Muller. You didn't think to ask that question? I thought we were investigating Russian collusion. The Russians know steel is a Basescu to the State Department, and the FBI do you Joe do you think it's just possible that the Russians knew that they'd say, hey, man, this is a golden opportunity to feed this guy. Some BS information that makes its way into the US government impossible. Yeah. You're torn rice, I spent a lot of time in Russia when I was a secret service guy die. They're not stupid. They may not be the wealthiest country on earth. But they're not idiots. Joe? Just full disclosure Joe. Yeah. Because you know, we'll be investigated by Bob Muller next where you in Russia to one point. Yeah. Okay. I just want that out there, folks. Because Bob MO Jo I know why he was he was a personal thing at I'm not gonna but I was in Russia for work. Bob muller. I did not collude with the Russias. I've just putting out there, folks. Okay. Bob Muller be knocking on my door net. Joe to he was in Russia to leave Joe alone free. Joe? Wanted me to put that on a t shirt, but our store. What is it save Joe or free jobs? Pretty funny like Free Willy movie free arm, a guy robs bags Russian Koluder. Everything's unbelievable. Takeaway number two from the strassel piece..

Bob Muller Russia Joe Bob Mueller State Department Kim strassel US FBI Russian Koluder Obama State Department Bob MO Jo Wall Street Journal special counsel Washington Jonathan winer Christopher Kremlin Moscow Chuck Ross Russias Steele
"bob muller" Discussed on 850 WFTL

850 WFTL

11:52 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on 850 WFTL

"On Twitter this morning of Robert Marlow wearing a t shirt that said I spent two and a half years compiling this report. And all I got was this lousy t shirt, you know, and and that's pretty much how I feel about it. But from the beginning of this, very small group of people people in politics, people who are members of the media the larger portion of the media, including a lot of people who you know, I used to have respect for thought that the special prosecutor was going to get to the bottom, and that we were going to get rid of this president. And that's how it was presented to the American public. That Robert Mueller is the best guy for the. Job. And there's no way Donald Trump survives this investigation. Then there were people like me, a very small minority people in politics. Handful people in conservative talk radio, and and conservative media a small handful couple of riders on various websites. The federalist writers like, Ben Weingarten, Mollie Hemingway. You know, there were there were some out there who actually said Bob Muller is not such a great guy doesn't have such a great reputation. And I'm gonna have a hard time believing anything that he says, whether he, you know, exonerates the president which he did or whether he find some sort of credible criminal charges, and then it all began, and we saw the most heavy handed use of power ever. I mean we had indictment. Wants that to say I question them is the understatement of the year they were as far away from collusion. Which was what I was told was the the reason for this investigation to begin with. They were process crimes they were crimes that preceded relationship that for instance, Paul Manafort who started his federal term today. I mean, the charges against him had absolutely nothing to do with the Trump campaign and extensively not that much to do with Russia. Either mo- more to do with the crane than with Russia. More to do with his his mouth Eason's in terms of whether he was registered to lobby, blah, blah, blah, the same things, by the way that that pedestrian from the Clinton campaign John Podesta has been accused of. But hey, we wouldn't want investigate anybody having to do with the Clinton campaign. Now, would we so no, no collusion process? Crimes certainly general Flynn, one of the most agree GIS examples of heavy-handedness I've ever seen and that there. Yeah. The more I looked at this report of the last couple of days, the more. I realized there's some stuff that's missing in this report. There's some really important stuff. This just not in it. Yeah. Especially from the first section, which is really the only section that. I was interested in the second session. The second volume is basically this, you know, this heavy handed approach to impeachment that was handed to the congress. You know, the that to me is an illegitimate part of the report anyway, so I'm not going to deal with it that much, but let me tell you that in the first part of the report that's supposed to be dealing with collusion, not obstruction. But collusion. I didn't see I didn't see one word about the the so-called fruit of poisonous tree right here. We have a Russian conspiracy, which you know, they mentioned the Logan act and treason and all of these theories that ended up not being at all true. And they never once talked about the unmasking of people like general Flynn Jeff Sessions and never talked about the spying on a presidential campaign by a political adversary based in part on a an unverified dossier that was gotten from a very sketchy. You know, foreign agent slash spoke with Russian sources slash paid for by an opposition campaign. Right. None of that was mentioned in this report. None of the the circularity in the warrants that were backing the spying. None of you know, the fact that they would I use the dossier. And then use a report is version of the dossier. That's called the chicanery that's called circular firing squads. And you're not supposed to do that. How about the use of informants to entrap people that were part of the Trump campaign. Trump transition team how about all the league. Wchs. Some of which were actually illegal leaks. What where was all that? I I didn't see any of that. In the in the Muller report. I didn't see anything about the bias that you saw the Peter Struck and Lisa page emails. I didn't see anything about the ethical infractions. The the absolute positively outright, criminality, and double standards that law enforcement in particular, the FBI. How they dealt so differently with Trump Russia and the Hillary Clinton Email investigations, not a word. The collusion section of the Muller report barely addresses any of those things. How could you have an investigation and expect me to believe a word of it? If you don't deal with any of those issues, you gotta deal with all of them. I just want her to all of them are not not gloss over them the way some of them got glossed over. Not one word in this. I volume in this report. Where they actually addressed whether or not a special council should have been appointed a special counsel is only to be appointed. When there's a criminal investigation. So the Muller special counsel appointment didn't come from a criminal investigation. Did it it came from a counter intelligence investigation? A special counsel's supposed to to to look at a specific factual statement of the matter to be investigated. That didn't seem at all prevalent or relevant in the Muller special counsel, right? Its scope was virtually unlimited. It doesn't even attempt to address whether or not some people founded illegitimate, it doesn't deal with the conflicts of interest. It doesn't deal with improper actions that would take in by those who were associated with it who created it. We don't even know who created it. We know that Robert Muller didn't sit there and write four hundred something pages. Other people helped him and created this report and some of them, by the way. Disgraced Andrew McCabe, James Komi. These rod Rosenstein, Sean Davis points out that some of these people should have been targeted the investigations themselves, particularly Komi, and Rosenstein and McCabe, you know, but, but there's no mention of that was this a legitimate use of the special counsel and were the people involved in the special counsel legitimate. Not a word. Yeah. The only thing dealing with those subjects that I found in the report. There's nothing the appearance of conflict. No discussion not a word in. This report about what everybody now agrees even the people who who hate Donald Trump understand that. There was a a bias that there were people on the team on Robert Muller's team like Andrew Weisman who were at Hillary Clinton's election night party. They were the same people who cheered on Sally Yates when she defied an order direct directive from President Trump, you had genie re I mean she's assigned and she was actually Hillary Clinton's attorney. She was the one who represented Hillary Clinton in the Email. Case. And now she's on the team investigating Donald Trump. She also was working for the Clinton foundation. She was also a deputy assistant attorney general in the Obama administration. You had errands, Ed Lee. Another guy who defended Justin Cooper who was a Hillary Clinton staffer. This was the guy who installed her infamous private Email server. You had Democrats with deep ties to the administration under which all of this began the Obama administration as well as the presidential opponent. Hillary clinton. And meanwhile, Muller was a former FBI director was a better in the political establishment. He's deep state if ever there was deep state. And he came from all the institutions from which this investigation, actually sprung. His report does not address any of the misconduct of the high ranking individuals that were behind this investigation. And and that in and of itself makes me wonder why we're treating it with any respect at all. You would think Mullah would have at least sought to create the appearance of neutrality, right? Given all the anti-trump by that were exposed in those emails between struck and page McCabe. You know, the the the nonsense that went on with operation crossfire, all of this stuff that came out and Muller apparently didn't think it was necessary to even address that issue in his report. In fact, he doesn't even discuss the circumstances surrounding the removal from his team of the most obvious Trump trumpeter that the public ever heard of FBI agent. Peter Struck not a word. And I'm not done. So you do want to hear this because when you have this debate, and you will have this debate with your friends, and those who somehow believe that, you know, they they they know more than you do about this report. And this report is a clear indication of what congress needs to do, blah, blah, blah, you need to tell them. But wait a second. How come these things never came up in? That report. Kind of undermines the credibility of the entire report doesn't it? Yeah. You bet. It does stay right where you are. Listen to the south Florida morning show with Jennifer Rawson, Bill Adams offers the latest news information and trimming stories because you deserve it yourself. Seriously. Tomorrow morning from five thirty am on news talk. Eight.

Robert Muller Hillary Clinton President Trump special counsel FBI president Peter Struck Trump Russia congress Robert Mueller Robert Marlow Clinton foundation Obama administration Twitter Russia Paul Manafort prosecutor Ben Weingarten Flynn
"bob muller" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

02:43 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"But shift is gonna parrot the company line now shift has been insisting for months for months, Adam Schiff, sleazy democrat, congressman from California that he has direct evidence of a conspiratorial arrangement to collude to impact the election between the Trump team and the Russians he has been suggesting that for months Joe he has evidence. Of what the Bob Muller report recall an agreement and agreement between the Trump team and the Russians to impact the election in a negative fashion in an effort to subvert the will of the people. No evidence of that has ever ever emerged ever. Yet shift will not let it go. Here's a shift on Fox News Sunday request. Chris Wallace being held to the fire on this. Where's your evidence, dude? And watch the spin by this limi-, dirtbag shift chairman you've been leading the charge for more than a year that President Trump and his campaign colluded with the Russians to interfere in the twentieth. Sixteen election here are just a few examples. This is about as clear evidence, you could find intent by the campaign to collude with the Russians to get useful information from the Russians by think, there's plenty of evidence of collusion or conspiracy in plain sight at did say that there is ample evidence, and indeed there is of collusion of people in the Trump campaign with the Russians, but let's look at what the Muller report found, and I want to put it up on the screen volume one pages. One two and five we understood coordination to require an agreement task. Acid or its brass between the Trump campaign and the Russian government on election interference the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities. Mr Chairman, the special counsel did not find the kind of coordination that you said was there. Chris as you know. And I wish you had played the rest of some of those clips I went on to say that whether that collusion that Evan seclusion rises to prove beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of conspiracy was a different question. And indeed that distinction is made in the opening pages of the mullahs report. So when the president and his allies repeat this mantra of no collusion. They clearly haven't read or ignoring the plain language of the report where Bob Muller says two things he says, we're not gonna look into the question of whether it's collusion, that's a common lay term that can be criminal or non criminal conduct. We're going to look at the crime of conspiracy..

President Trump Bob Muller Mr Chairman Chris Wallace Russian government Adam Schiff Joe congressman president California mullahs Evan special counsel
Rep. Adam Schiff: Mueller report condemns, it doesn't vindicate

Forensic Talk with Jim Campbell

00:57 sec | 2 years ago

Rep. Adam Schiff: Mueller report condemns, it doesn't vindicate

"More. Now on our top story reaction to the release of the Miller report, California, congressman democrat, Adam Schiff chair of the house Intel. L committee still floating the concept of impeachment even though the report finds no evidence of Trump Russia collusion. Here's congressman Schiff. We need to look at the full report, certainly what Bob Muller has revealed on the obstruction of Justice issue is the most concerning because that of course involves the president's own conduct his own falsehoods. The American people is efforts to get other people to tell lies is effort to deter people in cooperating with the investigation is effort to reward those who stuck to the party line and congressman Schiff continues those acts of obstruction of Justice, whether they are criminal or not are deeply alarming in the president of the United States. And it's clear the special counsel Muller wanted the congress to consider the repercussions and the consequences. It is clear the special counsel believed that no one was above the law, and that includes the president of the United States.

Congressman Schiff Adam Schiff President Trump Bob Muller Congressman Special Counsel United States Intel Russia Miller Congress California
"bob muller" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

106.1 FM WTKK

07:50 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

"Talking about? Why is this not on Fox News wise, this not on Newsmax was this now, by the way, we're not Newsmax today because they're doing some kind of an Israeli election special. So that we're not we'll be back on Newsmax tomorrow for those that are that curious. So I've got some breaking news here folks, the modern vest Gatien is not over. It's not on CNN not on FOX. I I'm going to be the first to bring this to you. Well, actually a source, but however, the Muller investigation when everyone thought it was over it was not the Muller investigation continues. Oh, stop Bob baller, though. It's It's Brooke Muller who was a a former wife of Charlie Sheen. Have you lost your mind? Interesting. Hey, the Muller. She was apparently really investigated by the TSA. Everyone loves a good TSA story here. Listen to this page six which is the gossip section of the New York Post last night. They they posted this online for for print today. Charlie Sheen's ex wife Bruckmuller. Mr. flight from LA Tamiami on Friday because TSA agents examined her for an hour. According to sources Muller who has a ten year old or who Muller who has ten year old twin boys with Charlie Sheen who he'll he's been very quiet. Charlie Sheen is not made a lot of it just in very subdued and quiet. Remember when he was collapsing. And all the crazy interviews and statement who is Meg he's just been remarkably quiet, of course, as you know, health issues, but Hsun was married to her. They had twin boys, and I guess Muller this Bruckmuller. So how do you pronounce her Muller or she newletter? Can you check that out from a oh, you call it idiot? Do just checks if you can find some video where they were she's introduced or whatever because of course, a Bob Muller. Of the Muller investigation the Russia probe. Bob Muller is Bob Muller. But it's amazing to me the number of people that call him Bob Mueller or the Mueller investigation. No. It's thought Mueller. It is Bob Muller. I wanna make sure that I'm that mispronouncing, Brooke Muller or Mueller's Nick even educated, folks. I mean folks that are respectable. We'll call it. The Bob Mueller, Alex. No, it's it's it's Muller. Anyway, everyone loves a good TSA fondling story. So I thought I just up rip this off quickly. She says they strip searched her more than once as she's got a well documented history of cocaine abuse and has been in and out of rehab. She says she's been so prefer year, they combed her hair looking for who knows what and kept sending her bags back and forth. It was harassment. Okay. So sue says that it's it's Mueller spelled the same. But she ET she found some entertainment tonight that at that video. And apparently, it is me you'll her on her pronunciation, but it is Bob Muller not Mueller. Anyway, she was strip searched by the TSA. She says that she was harassed base wiped her hands so many times with those clo- with the cloths and the bottom of her feet. The swamps are for explosives residue. I don't think they show up, but he kind of cocaine residue. They're looking for gun powder. LS if I just come back from the range, and I was cleaning my guns. Let's say, and then I got swab with those little pads that looked like those those strikes strikes pimple pads that were in those jars sitting in alcohol when I was a teenager back in nineteen eighty two. You know, those I've had done like to my hands like one thank did it come daughter maybe year ago khloe, my daughter gets her hands swamped. Yeah. That was a that's a good pick their PSA fan testing. That's I'm just great great investigative work right there. Anyway, I've had my bag suite. Yo, you know, what freaks out TSA scuba gear it in certain airports. If I have my my regulator. I never check. I check my my my BC, my buoyancy compensation device, that's the vest. I checked that on my fins. I check, but my ragbag with my dive computers, and my, you know, regulators I carry that on because Senate gets a little costly. And I can't take all my God. It's it's guys. Have you never seen scuba gear? A first stage of a second stage in some dive, computer? So I've had by scoop. Abegg swab on numerous occasions. Anyway, I just thought it was funny Fethi the Muller investigation in this case the Mueller investigation is not quite over. It's Brooke Mueller, not Bob Muller. All right, folks. Eight hundred eight zero one eighty nine ninety nine the nationwide number here on Schnitt. Eight hundred eight zero one eighty nine ninety nine also at this time or near the first part of the show tomorrow. So in this segment tomorrow, I still got to get some more ducks in a row here, folks, I might be screwed on something. So I will address this on tomorrow show in the first part of our number one. I could be screwed. In fact, I think I am screwed. Explain exactly what's going on on tomorrow's show. So make sure you plan for that HALE grab your phone calls today as I said, eight hundred eight zero one eighty nine that a mucking tell you Susan might your what is it is the taxes now, I don't know I dread that as well. I'm waiting to hear from Steve my CPA because I I need obviously know something by what Mondays the fifteenth right now, we we're not gonna file my actual returns on Monday. We usually get extensions because I've got, you know, lingering K ones that need to roll in. But we have a snapshot on. Whether I owe the IRS money some waiting for that news. I've got a right. The IRS what I've in estimated as well as what I have to write in whatever's do with the twenty eighteen tax return to the best of our calculations. Right. So when we get back in just a moment here, I want to get into Bill bar because even though he's very dry and boring. I got a little bit of audio. But I don't wanna snooze you out. But we still have to get into some of the details which are important regarding the release of the more report to the public, and we'll get into that folks momentarily here on snip. So please standby. Hey with Easter Easter is coming up quickly here. How 'bout stepping up your game with your Easter hand? Now, those listen to the show regularly. You know, that Omaha Steaks they advertise on the program, I rave about the quality and the value of Omaha Steaks. Well, guess what? Almost stakes has incr-. Credible Easter hams. How about stepping up your game? How about you know, upgrading your Easter ham with ova steaks, and there's an amazing offer.

Bob Muller Brooke Muller Muller Bob Mueller TSA Charlie Sheen Mueller Brooke Mueller Bob baller Newsmax Omaha Steaks cocaine abuse CNN New York Post IRS Gatien Fox News FOX cocaine
Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan says Mueller report shows no collusion

News, Traffic and Weather

07:53 min | 2 years ago

Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan says Mueller report shows no collusion

"President Trump down in Florida yesterday about to head to the golf course. Couple thumbs up mostly quiet though this weekend. But we're joined now by one of his top defenders in the house, the top Republican on the house oversight committee. Jim Jordan, congressman. Thank you for joining us your best morning, you're you're championships. Right there. He says the fact that there are no new indictments is not necessarily vindication for the president. You agree. Well, we got to read the report, but what I do know is to date not one bit of evidence to show any type of coordination collusion conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia to influence the election, and that was the charge George when this thing started almost two years ago. The Democrats were all saying that the president of the United States work with a hostile foreign country to steal the election. And again, there's not been one bit of evidence to suggest that any of that happened. Well, there's been a fair amount of evidence that fourteen fourteen associates of Trump had over one hundred contacts with the Russians even though you're quite right. There was no charge of conspiracy. Does any of the information that's been revealed? About those contexts are about the fact that so many in the Trump world lied about those contexts concern, you well, I mean, look the central charge of of the special counsel was to see if there was conspiracy coordination or collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia to impact the election as I've said that was the focus of the of the entire special counsel investigation. We've not seen any of that. And again, remember, this is Bob Muller. This was the guy the Democrats and the Repub everyone in town said this is the guy we need for the job. He is the best person we can pick. He is. He is right next to Jesus he can almost walk on water. This is the guy and he will have the definitive statement on that fundamental question. We'll see the report, but all indications are that there's not gonna be any finding of any collusion whatsoever. How about the other concern that one of the other concerns the chairmanship raise right there? The fact that President Trump might be compromised because he was pursuing that Trump Tower in Moscow during the campaign, not telling the truth about it may still be pursuing it today. Come on. I mean, look, here's what's happened. They they don't think this Muller reports going to be the bombshell, they all anticipated. It was going to be. So now, they're launching all kinds of other charges all kinds of other investigation. They bring in Michael Cohen a few weeks ago. This was their first big hearing their first star witness there. First witness of the one hundred sixteenth congress a guy who's going to prison in six weeks for lying to congress. They bring him in. And what does he do he lies again, we think at least seven times under oath in front of the congress again? So that didn't that didn't work for him. Now, what's chairman, neither do Eighty-one different letters to sixty some different individuals starting a whole new fishing expedition, this is how they operate. So if it's not the bombshell, they wanted they bring in Cullen that doesn't work that hearing is a flop then they go with chairman Nadler Eighty-one different letters sent out there. This is how the Democrats are going to operate. We just got to be used to it and understand that that's where they're gonna go. Do you stand by your vote that the country should see congress? The entire Muller report the turning Jenner was clear in his letter. A short letter Friday. There was a lot of important things. He said in there. He said he's going to consult with rod Rosenstein, he's going to consult with the special counsel, Bob Muller, and he's going to release as much as he possibly can consistent with the law. I think the Democrats should be that should be what we all want an attorney general who operates according to the law. So I'm I'm for airing on the side of transparency the whole thing released. You didn't have those qualifications in the vote. Yes, we did consistent with the law. That's what we want. And and I think the Democrats would want the same thing. But I'll tell you this, George if he's got a release all the information that I want all of it released. I want those three, oh, I want the conversations between Bruce or and Christopher Steele the guy who wrote the dossier. Glenn simpson. The guy that Clinton campaign hired to put the dossier together. I want all those conversations that Bruce or had with Glenn Simpson. Christopher Steele, those recorded those notes from the FBI I want all that. Application to be made public when they use. They use that dossier took it to a secret court didn't tell the court the Clinton campaign paid for that document didn't tell the court a foreigner. Who was who was desperate to stop Trump from being elected, president wrote, the document I wanted that information released to the breeze thing. Let's let's release it all let's be clear on that. Then. So you agree with the Democrats all the underlying documents should be released top to bottom. The Muller report should be released. We've just gone through the special counsel regulations. There's nothing in the law that precludes the attorney general from release that I'm saying that the attorney general said follow the statute. And that's what he's indicated. He's going to do in consultation with rod Rosenstein and Bob Muller. I think the Democrats should be happy with that. They said Bob Mueller was the guy that they wanted to do this investigation. Billboards Bill bars going to consult with him and decide what he can release. But if they do release everything then by golly release, it all show is application show us two three. Oh to show us the information. They gave the gang of eight the gang of eight with Adam. Mm ship was a part of that the gang of eight when they talk to them way back with about this dossier about what took place at the a court and about the start of this counterintelligence investigation show us all that information to the American people deserve we've asked for that information to be made public a long time ago because that goes to what these top people this cabal top of the FBI what they did when they launched this thing. Clear back in the summer and fall of twenty sixteen before the election, the president could order all this released on his own all of the declassified on his own. We urge him to do that. I've urged him to do to release this stuff. I just described. I sure have the stuff that Jim call me Andy McCabe. Jim Baker Lisa page. Peter Struck all this stuff that they had started with the dossier and all this stuff that they'd started initially with this investigation prior to the election. We urge him to order the release of the mullahs report is well again, that's the attorney general's call. And he's gonna do that consistent with the law saying is if the Democrats if the Democrats are gonna call for all that to be released, then they should call for everything to be asking you a different question. Now, the president has this authority. Are you asking the president to order the release of the Miller report, that's the that's the president's call? He said he wanted to be made public. He said that the other day when he was walking. I think out in front of the press. I think last Wednesday he said that. So that's that's the White House has called you mentioned the here. Michael Cohen a couple of weeks back as we know from the southern district of New York. They concluded that President Trump was individual one who directed. Michael Cohen to make those hush money payments to influence the election, essentially, directed a felony. Does that concern you, look, I I like I said Michael Cohen came in front of our committee, and he lied, we think at least seven times, that's why congressman meadows an ice in a criminal referral letter to the Justice department. We know he lied about his when he said he didn't want a job in the White House. We know that was a lie. Every every media outlet in the country had reported that is the conclusion of the southern district. Prosecutors they're the ones who said that individual one President Trump directed Michael Cohen to do this. Well, I mean, there's they have their investigation that they're doing in the southern district of New York. What I choose to focus on is the fundamental the charge of the of the special counsel was to look at collusion. We have not seen any of that. What I also know is Michael Cohen cannot be trusted any prove that when he was when he came back in front of the committee and several times lied under oath. I think the real question years will chairman Cummings. Join us in demanding that Michael Cohen be charged for perjury by the Justice department. I think he should do that. He was very clear at the start of the hearing. He said, Mr. Cohen, if you don't tell the truth, I'm going to hold you accountable, and we've seen nothing from chairman Cummings to do any of that any kind of holding him accountable at all so just to be clear the president's involvement of those payments doesn't concern you the president has had an amazing two years. He was in. He was in Ohio last Wednesday. And what I saw was people lining the street is he wrote. From the airport to the tank plant where we build the best tanks in the world. I saw people cheering him because they understand that this presence committed to fighting for the American people and getting accomplish the things he told the American people he was gonna do it was an amazing reception. He received from all kinds of folks here in the fourth district of Ohio just last

President Trump Bob Muller Michael Cohen Special Counsel Attorney Chairman Trump Tower Donald Trump Glenn Simpson FBI Russia George Jim Jordan Rod Rosenstein Congressman Christopher Steele Golf Bruce United States
The Mueller Report: Ball now in Attorney General's court

WBZ Afternoon News

02:03 min | 2 years ago

The Mueller Report: Ball now in Attorney General's court

"In Washington all eyes today on the Justice department once again as attorney general bar and deputy attorney general Rosenstein continue to review the special counsel Robert Muller's report on Russian interference in collusion with the Trump administration in the twentieth. Sixteen presidential election, Democrats and Republicans ally calling for the AG to make the report public to the fullest extent possible. We get the latest now from CBS is Wendy Gillette sometime today will likely learn more about what's in special counsel, Robert Muller's report. The attorney general is expected to release a summary. Democrats want the full report, the chairman of the House Judiciary committee, Representative Jerrold Nadler. I hope the department of Justice will not leave things hanging by seeking to keep things secret. He spoke on NBC, California Democratic Representative Adam Schiff says he respects the reports findings the issue of indictment of prosecution of that is Bob Mola's decision. And I have great confidence in him. He was interviewed on CBS face the nation. Republican Representative Jim Jordan on ABC. He said he's going to consult with rod Rosenstein, he's going to consult with the special counsel, Bob Muller, and he's going to release as much as he possibly can consistent with the law. I think the Democrats should be that should be what we all want an attorney general who operates according to the law. CBS news update. I'm Wendy July, Massachusetts, congressman Stephen Lynch saying he'd like to hear firsthand from the special counsel about his conclusions. And the contents of his report I would be shocked if we did not have Bob Muller, sit down the conditions of that whether whether it's public or whether it's private. And which committee she might sit before I think that's all open to debate. I know there are four or five committees in congress that would like to have shit for an interview. And then I think in fairness if there are still some underlying questions, I think probably a public hearing within at attendance as as the primary witness would be

Special Counsel Bob Mola Representative Jerrold Nadler Robert Muller Attorney Bob Muller CBS House Judiciary Committee General Rosenstein Representative Jim Jordan Wendy July Justice Department Rod Rosenstein Department Of Justice Adam Schiff Wendy Gillette Stephen Lynch
Impeachment Begins, Sort Of

The Erick Erickson Show

07:28 min | 2 years ago

Impeachment Begins, Sort Of

"So I think that might be Cohen will only be ineffective witness to the extent he's independently corroborated either by other testimony, meaning verbal testimony or by documents or both because he's got an awful history. Now that doesn't mean that everything he says is ally. But what it does mean is that you have to corroborate him. And I think any any prosecutor at certainly someone as careful as skilled and as objective. As Bob Muller would never use someone as Michael like Michael Cohen unless he could crop rate them. And I think in general the same thing about the folks at the southern district, and she this this is the problem here. Remember, what all the spin was on bubbler going back only two weeks ago? We don't have to go that far back Democrats were saying that in the Manafort situation and the Coen situation in the Roger stone's situation that all of Bob molars allegations have multiple corroborating witnesses. All of Bob Mueller's charges or not based on one person. But on three four or five people that Cohen himself by himself as unreliable Cohen by himself could easily be dismissed as liar saying with Roger stone, Roger stolen could be dismissed buzz Aligarh Jerome Corsi, whoever. But there are multiple people who can paint the picture multiple people filling in the billings, multiple people back in each other up through separate independent investigations. So to have built that entire case into trotted out. Michael Cohen last week for Democrats to now be saying, hey, we gotta do this ourselves. Pretty big indicator. They're not going to get what they thought from the the Bob Mueller investigation that all of their hype about the Mueller investigation really doesn't live up to it. Now. One more clip Sarah Fagin is she's a Republican right of center strategist, not a Trump fan on with George Stephanopoulos over the weekend. Only the rest of the extent to Matt's point. If there is some real they're they're in and right now, we don't have evidence of collusion. Most Americans manafort's evidence of collusion. Will you have manafort's crimes, but that doesn't necessarily extend to the president. And we'll see what the mullahs report says, but one would think after a year, plus eighteen months, we would see something if it was directly connected to the president

Michael Cohen Bob Mueller Roger Stone Bob Muller Manafort BOB Jerome Corsi President Trump Prosecutor Sarah Fagin George Stephanopoulos Matt Donald Trump Coen Eighteen Months Two Weeks
Markey says Congress will fight to make Mueller report public if "sanitized" by DOJ

The Mom Show

00:39 sec | 2 years ago

Markey says Congress will fight to make Mueller report public if "sanitized" by DOJ

"I'm Mona Rivera. The Justice department is being put on notice about the special counsel report house intelligence committee chief Adam Schiff, we will obviously subpoena. The report we will bring Bob Muller into testified before congress, we will take to court if necessary and in the end, I think the department understands they're going to have to make this public shift on ABC's this week where attorney Alan Dershowitz, a Trump supporter. Agreed. It would be a mistake to keep Muller's finding secret. If his information is not released to the public, and then goes to congress to conduct the investigation. I think there'll be a question of credibility to report on Russian interference into the two thousand sixteen election is

Bob Muller Justice Department Congress Mona Rivera Adam Schiff Alan Dershowitz Special Counsel Donald Trump ABC Attorney
Roger Stone in court as Mueller probe nears conclusion

The Beat with Ari Melber

02:50 min | 2 years ago

Roger Stone in court as Mueller probe nears conclusion

"Tonight with breaking news in an open case in the Mueller probe Trump adviser, Roger stone. Just took the stand for the first time. He was just grilled by Muller prosecutor for the first time and he was rebuked silenced by federal judge. We are reporting on a truly wild day in federal court where judge Amy Berman Jackson took Trump aide Roger stone to task. There's really no other way to put it pressing him in public court proceedings on whether he was today lying to the court. And then she shut him down supersizing partial gag order into a full gag order against Donald Trump's longest-serving advisor. What does that mean? It means tonight. I can report for you. Roger stone can't say anything else in public about his case. The judge also suggesting this is the final warning and clear suggestion the next time that stone would be punished it will be with immediate jail. Todd now, Roger stone is a defendant in this Mueller probe. So these developments happening late today are obviously progress for Bob Muller, and they come in an extraordinary afternoon that revealed the legal limits on Roger stone's very well known effort to turn serious proceeding. Into a baroque theatre of the absurd. This normally voluble dirty trickster turned mournful and morose says he pled for mercy from the court while taking the stand again as I mentioned for the first time today and Winstone did leave as you see here with his freedom hanging by a thread. It was noticeable. He did not say a word in the departure. You see on your screen from the courthouse? Mark today as the official end to Roger stone's attempts to publicly attack, the Miller probe and the judge or the FBI as he did in releasing this video and going on and on about his arrest. There has been weeks of those attempts to use that footage. Well, we are now a long ways from Roger stone's antics that you may have seen on television when he was first indicted from the Nixon victory salute to holding impromptu press conferences at the courthouse. Now, let me tell you all of this obviously right now, which is big news. No matter how you slice. It is happening has Washington and the legal. And political worlds around the country buzz over whether this long-awaited Bob Muller report is coming soon. But these issues that all came to light today are a reminder that even if large parts of that probe are heading towards some sort of resolution this Roger stone case which touches on WikiLeaks and alleged potential attempts to collude it's open it is alive, and it is putting heat on the Trump world, which makes understanding today's developments, very important. So let me take you through some of them in detail. Roger stone came in today and began by telling the court, quote, I'm hurtful e sorry for my own stupidity.

Roger Stone Bob Muller Donald Trump Mueller Winstone Amy Berman Jackson Prosecutor FBI Advisor Washington Wikileaks Todd Nixon Mark Miller Official
"bob muller" Discussed on WBZ NewsRadio 1030

WBZ NewsRadio 1030

02:41 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on WBZ NewsRadio 1030

"Bob Muller is believed to be nearing the end of his investigation into Russian interference in the two thousand sixteen election and any possible connections between Russia and the Trump campaign CBS news White House correspondent Stephen Portnoy with the very latest as speculation mounts that the special counsel on the cusp of finishing up his work. The president was asked if Robert Muller's report should be released while he's in Vietnam meeting with Kim Jong Hoon next week. That'll be totally up to the new attorney general. He's a tremendous manager Mendez. Person who really respects this country and respects the Justice department. So that'll be totally up to attorney general Bill bar has vowed transparency, but he hasn't explicitly promised to publicly released Muller's report in full Steven Portnoy, CBS news, Washington. Former acting FBI director Andrew McCabe appeared on Anderson Cooper three sixty last night and revealed that he opened the investigation into President Trump because he thought Trump could be a Russian asset today, the president had this response McCabe made a fool out of himself over the last couple of days, and he really looks to me like sort of a poor man's J. Edgar Hoover is a I think is a disaster cave said the president is undermining the role of US intelligence, President Trump is also lashing out at the New York Times out the first time probably not the last times reporting, the president asked then acting attorney general Matt Whitaker to put a lawyer. Loyalist in charge. Michael Cohen's criminal case in the southern district of New York ABC's. Karen Travers at the White House with this Trump slammed the New York Times Wednesday morning on Twitter calling the newspaper, quote, a true enemy of the people after it published a report that says the president pushed his former acting attorney general to interfere in the investigation into hush money payments made by his former lawyer Michael Cohen, but it was just last month when the president sat down for an interview in the Oval Office with two reporters from the New York Times when an aide to the president came into remind him he had important calls to make the president. According to a transcript from the time said, quote, what's more important than the New York Times. Okay. Nothing nothing. Karen Travers, ABC news. The White House time four oh eight Wall Street is closed. Let's find out what happened with Tracy jonky over a Bloomberg. And I can't believe how close the Dow is so very close to twenty six thousand Laurie. I knew you would notice that is less than fifty points away up sixty three points. And we haven't seen. Twenty six thousand in three months. Nasdaq was up two points, the SMP up five this was CBS health's worst day.

President Trump president New York Times Robert Muller acting attorney general CBS Karen Travers attorney White House correspondent New York ABC Stephen Portnoy Kim Jong Hoon Steven Portnoy White House Michael Cohen Andrew McCabe Justice department Mendez
"bob muller" Discussed on The Beat with Ari Melber

The Beat with Ari Melber

02:07 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on The Beat with Ari Melber

"Podcast. This is our a Melber. We have something very special for you here. Just this week, Bob Muller, indicted, Roger stone. And he names two key witnesses that he relied on in part for this indictment. One of them. You may have heard of he's referred to as person one and his name's Jerome Corsi. And he is just one of four key Muller. Witnesses that I gathered together for an interview that we checked is really unprecedented. These are all people who've worked with Roger stone or the Trump campaign. They're very relevant to all the news breaking and we get into it. Sam number in the interview about to hear discusses what he was asked about by Muller prosecutors including Michael Cohen and Trump Tower Moscow three of the witnesses said in this interview this week they were repeatedly asked about Roger stone by motor. Prosecutors. That's even more interesting given the indictment and Carter page, and I go back and forth and get into it about whether it was really a good idea for him to meet with Russian spies. All of that is in this interview. I'll tell you. It's one that we are team here at the beat worked hard on. I hope you'll give it a listen. And as always if you like what we're doing here and the podcast extras feel free to rate us, whatever you think we're worth we love five stars. And thank you as always for supporting the beat with Ari Melber on MSNBC. We are now going to do something. We've never done before all the discussion about the Miller probe. It's rare to hear firsthand. What's happening inside the molar pro because his office doesn't leak accounts from the lawyers and witnesses involved. A rare or offered on background in anonymous bits and pieces to reporters tonight. Four key witnesses in the Russia probe are here in one place for one live interview for the first time together each person at this table that you see is linked to President Trump and his directly involved Bob motives Russia probe each have given some sort of testimony the feds one of these four men was explicitly warned that Muller could indict him Drome Corsey is the only person in this probe to publicly release Muller's written warning that he could be indicted on the felony of lying to investigators one of these four men face the risk of imprisonment for another reason..

Bob Muller Roger stone Jerome Corsi Trump Tower Moscow President Trump Melber Ari Melber Russia MSNBC Drome Corsey Carter Miller Michael Cohen
"bob muller" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

106.1 FM WTKK

03:15 min | 2 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

"That's the way. It's exactly like what you see on the media, everyday, Sean. It's just this is politics, but it's really one of the same. They're just doing it. To give evidence for the quarter public opinion and molars doing it and using the same evidence for their for a a real court. It's gonna go nowhere. Where does this all do? You think come to an end because I actually think now with the revelation this week that Bruce or told everybody that this was a political document. I still believe that if we had equal Justice under the law. Dan, Bongino, Hillary would be in trouble. You know, all of a sudden they didn't care about the bleach bit the subpoenaed emails deleted and all the devices, busted, they didn't care about that case of obstruction the twenty trying to twist one together here that doesn't exist. And but more importantly now that we know that there was a massive and widespread lying and fraud committed to the courts when they knew from day one. And that Muller totally ignored the Russian connection with Hillary. I don't know how that has credibility except that the media hates Trump, and they ignore anything that would be culpa, Tori that they say they care about. Sean, I think the three letter agency people are in a world of trouble here. FBI the CIA folks Brennan believe there's been a massive paper trail, and I just let me show that you think about this one day. This is a pivotal dates ally. Twenty seven twenty seventeen a bunch of things happen on that day. Right. Bob Muller finds out and July twenty seven twenty seventeen from g Michael Horowitz, Peter stroke checks that they have them. In other words, the whole schemes been exposed. Bob Muller knows it g tells Bob Muller, they have the tax. You know, what happens on that same day that James Baker story being under criminal investigation was broken a long time ago by John Solomon in an article it circa, you know, what happens on that day? Sean popadopoulos is picked up at the airport and the day before manafort's houses hit what does that tell you? That tells you Muller knows this whole thing is the scheme, the tech skip the whole scheme up from Peter stroke, and he's trying to shut everybody up by locking up popadopoulos Manafort, and they got afraid about that Baker story under criminal investigation. All on the same day. You guys can look it up July twenty seven. 2017? That's when the fused with went on this. That's a great point. All right. Dan Bongino, and Jonathan Gilliam eight hundred nine four one Sean toll-free telephone number. We'll take a quick break. We'll come back. But I gotta tell you about the black rifle coffee company now both, Dan and Jonathan know about American heroes. They're heroes in their own way in their own, right. But our friends at black rifle coffee. They developed the single best rose to order coffee that you've ever had in your entire life. Every bit of coffee you've ever tasted before it's almost going to be like you didn't drink real coffee. I mean, that's the beautiful thing about this. So you have American heroes fighting overseas. Literally developing these specific coffee blends with rose and coffee beans from around the world. So a company built by American heroes and service people and people that are first responders. Now, they also hire veterans and first responders, and they donate to veterans causes. And I respect. Founders. And it's the best Cup of coffee you've ever had and your life, and they deliver it right to your door every day..

Bob Muller Dan Bongino Sean popadopoulos Sean Peter stroke Hillary James Baker Jonathan Gilliam manafort fraud Brennan Bruce Trump FBI Michael Horowitz Tori John Solomon CIA one day
"bob muller" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

106.1 FM WTKK

01:43 min | 3 years ago

"bob muller" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

"Think Bob Muller has at least another years worth of work to do whether whether he releases this in in sections are all at once. I don't know. A what the house of representatives does the judiciary committee under congressman Nadler, the committee under congressman Schiff? I don't know you assume many Trump investigation these are fierce fierce opponents of the president who been personally assaulted verbally assaulted by him. And now the shoe's on the other foot. So you expect a rocky year for this investigation for the White House the new White House legal counsel who was not in the job yet. Patch up alone is going to hire a two or three times as many lawyers as his predecessor Don Mcgann had because they expect subpoenas to becoming daily judge. Andrew Napolitano, great to talk to you. Thanks for joining us coming up. It said now that our economy is the strongest it's ever been in the history of our country, and you just have to take a look at the numbers. And we will when our Fox News special continues a year and Donald Trump. America. Get ready to binge. It's new to view streaming edition. Kick off the new year with some blockbusters coming to net. Flicks. This January solo a Star Wars story drops on January ninth hotel Transylvania three on the twenty fourth Marvel's ant man, and the wasp is available on the twenty ninth as well as Pixar the incredible to on January thirtieth..

Bob Muller White House congressman Nadler congressman Schiff Donald Trump Andrew Napolitano Don Mcgann Transylvania Marvel legal counsel president Pixar Fox News America