35 Burst results for "Barrett Supreme Court"

Feinstein will not seek Senate Judiciary Committee leadership

War Room

00:33 sec | 3 months ago

Feinstein will not seek Senate Judiciary Committee leadership

"Senate committee is losing its chair. Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, announced Monday that she's stepping down as the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee after groups on the left criticized her handing of Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court confirmation hearing. Feinstein came under scathing criticism after she hugged Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham at the end of Barrett's confirmation hearing and praise his handling of it. She sparked outrage on the left after she thank grand For quote. One of the best sets of hearings I've ever participated in and praise or GOP colleagues were fairness and the opportunity of going back and forth Bernie Bennett in Washington, Joe

Senator Dianne Feinstein Senate Judiciary Committee Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court Senate Committee Feinstein Lindsey Graham Judiciary Committee California Barrett GOP Bernie Bennett Washington JOE
Tlingit Artefacts Decision, ACA Concerns, and Arizona Voters Mobilized

Native America Calling

03:50 min | 4 months ago

Tlingit Artefacts Decision, ACA Concerns, and Arizona Voters Mobilized

"This is national native. News Antonio Gonzalez a collection of artifacts from the Clink Frog House clan can continue to be displayed in a Museum that's despite a legal challenge that reached Alaska's highest court as Clare Struggle with K. H. NS reports the State Supreme Court has apparently ended. A decades-old will dispute over control of the cultural treasures. When Frog House clan members disputed the sale of artifacts to a Canadian collector in the nineteen seventies an Alaska. Superior. Court judge ruled that they actually belonged to all members of clones frog. House. The court ordered them placed in the care of clan elders living in the clan's traditional lands on the Upper Lynn Canal. It added a condition, they could only be sold with the unanimous consent of all frog clan members until the safe place was found near cluck won the artifacts would sit in the state museum in Juneau. There they remained for decades. Until last year when the carvings considered masterpieces were returned to quad. But that didn't sit well with some descendants who filed a lawsuit last summer. They argued that by housing the artifacts in the tribes heritage. Center the court had given them to the whole tribe rather than the frog house. Petersburg attorney Fred Trim made case in September that the Jocic one heritage center and Clock One kept the artifacts out of the clans reach. The protests clan members of whom their one hundred and four cannot use the artifacts. Artifacts are locked up in a museum that's not under the control or even. Recently, accessible to the Prague House numbers that the State's Supreme Court justices were unmoved in decision released on October twenty. First, they wrote the lower court had been correct and only exceptional circumstances could overturn the ruling from nineteen seventy eight. The for house posts and a copy of a carped screen are displayed at the joke one heritage sun her and cluck one the center is closed for the season but group to are available by appointment. I'm Clare Trample new. Mexico US Senator Tom Udall spoke on the Senate floor. Monday calling for the protection of Healthcare for native Americans before the Senate confirmation of Judge Amy Conybeare it to the Supreme Court. You'll raise concerns about the future of the affordable care act due to upcoming challenges. Udal says a repeal would devastate Indian country. opened the doors for so many native Americans to access the care they need. Whether it's an unplanned medical emergency or routine wellness checkups and screenings. Access to quality healthcare critical for native communities face disproportionate impacts from the COVID nineteen pandemic. The federal government has a trust and treaty obligation to consult with tribes and to provide native Americans healthcare. The affordable care act permanently reauthorized the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to Ke legal authority for the Indian service and expansion of access to healthcare for native Americans. You'll was among a group of senators and opposition of Barrett's Supreme Court nomination. Racial Equity Groups are hosting a virtual event Tuesday night to mobilize voters in Arizona. A key battleground state the National Congress of American Indians is joining Hispanic Asian. American. Native Hawaiian, and other groups to host the event to discuss voting and a number of issues from Kobe nineteen to racial justice. The event will be streamed on facebook at together we vote a Z.

Supreme Court State Supreme Court Frog House Clink Frog House Alaska Antonio Gonzalez Prague House Senate National Congress Of American Cluck Clare Struggle Upper Lynn Canal Senator Tom Udall Facebook Mexico Juneau Judge Amy Conybeare Arizona Petersburg
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on 5 Things

5 Things

02:54 min | 4 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on 5 Things

"His decision to <Speech_Male> do so calling <Speech_Male> it a responsible <Speech_Male> while many <Speech_Male> Republicans <SpeakerChange> have <Speech_Music_Male> shrugged off concerns. <Music> <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Music_Male> California <Speech_Male> is bracing <Speech_Male> for extreme fire <Speech_Male> weather conditions, <Speech_Male> Monday strong <Speech_Male> winds, and low <Speech_Male> humidity could <Speech_Male> create some of the most <Speech_Male> dangerous conditions <Speech_Male> of the year in <Speech_Male> state that's already <Speech_Male> been devastated <Speech_Male> by wildfires <Speech_Male> and the National <Speech_Male> Weather Service says <Speech_Male> conditions are <Speech_Male> uncomfortably similar <Speech_Male> to what <Speech_Male> led to last year's <Speech_Male> Cannes Kate Fire <Speech_Male> and twenty eight teams <Speech_Male> Campfire <Speech_Male> Pacific Gas, <Speech_Male> and electric has cut <Speech_Male> power to. Thousands <Speech_Male> of customers <Speech_Male> to help prevent against <Speech_Male> sparking fires <Speech_Male> the shut offs <Speech_Male> could affect more than a <Speech_Male> quarter of a million people <Speech_Male> in thirty <Speech_Male> six counties and <Speech_Male> seventeen tribal <Speech_Male> communities. <Speech_Male> Main fire concerns <Speech_Male> are in the northern <Speech_Male> part of the state <Speech_Male> particularly <Speech_Male> the San Francisco <Speech_Male> Bay area <Speech_Male> in California. <Speech_Male> This year wildfires <Speech_Male> have burned more <Speech_Male> than sixty four, hundred <Speech_Male> square miles <Speech_Male> and <SpeakerChange> killed <Speech_Music_Male> thirty one people. <Speech_Music_Female> <Speech_Music_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Male> Drop Storm <Speech_Male> Zeta is <Speech_Male> on the move <Speech_Male> it formed over the <Speech_Male> weekend and is expected <Speech_Male> to become <Speech_Male> a weak category <Speech_Male> one hurricane <Speech_Male> in the Gulf of Mexico <Speech_Male> by Tuesday. <Speech_Male> That <Speech_Male> makes twenty seven <Speech_Male> named storms <Speech_Male> in the two thousand twenty <Speech_Male> Atlantic Hurricane <Speech_Male> Season Zeta <Speech_Male> is expected to <Speech_Male> make landfall somewhere <Speech_Male> between Florida's <Speech_Male> Western panhandle <Silence> and Louisiana <Speech_Male> Cooler <Speech_Male> waters near the Gulf <Speech_Male> coast could allow <Speech_Male> the storm to weaken <Speech_Male> some before <Speech_Male> hitting land but <Speech_Male> the National Hurricane <Speech_Male> Center is warning <Speech_Male> that strong tropical <Speech_Male> storms can <Speech_Male> produce significant <Speech_Male> storm surge rainfall <Speech_Male> and wind <Speech_Music_Male> impacts. <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Music_Male> President <Speech_Male> Donald Trump's chief <Speech_Male> of staff Mark <Speech_Male> Meadows acknowledged <Speech_Male> on Sunday <Speech_Male> that the trump administration <Speech_Male> won't <Speech_Male> be able to do much <Speech_Male> about the spread <Speech_Male> of covid nineteen. <Speech_Male> He told <Speech_Male> CNN's state <Speech_Male> of the union Mark <Speech_Male> Meadows acknowledged <Speech_Male> on Sunday <Speech_Male> that the trump administration <Speech_Male> won't <Speech_Male> be able to do much <Speech_Male> about the spread <Speech_Male> of covid nineteen. <Speech_Male> He told <Speech_Male> CNN's state <Speech_Male> of the union quote <Speech_Male> was going <Speech_Male> to control the pandemic <Speech_Male> on quote <Speech_Male> instead <Speech_Male> he said the administration <Speech_Male> is working <Speech_Male> on getting vaccines <Speech_Male> therapeutics <Speech_Male> and other mitigations <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> Democratic presidential <Speech_Male> nominee. Joe Biden <Speech_Male> railed against <Speech_Male> those comments sang <Speech_Male> the administration <Speech_Male> admitted that <Speech_Male> it has given up on <Speech_Male> trying to control <Speech_Male> the pandemic <Speech_Male> there were more than <Speech_Male> eighty three, thousand <Speech_Male> new cases of. covid <Speech_Male> nineteen in the <Speech_Male> US on Friday, <Speech_Male> down to about <Speech_Male> sixty thousand on <Speech_Male> Sunday in <Speech_Male> all more than two <Speech_Male> hundred, twenty, five, <Speech_Male> thousand people <Speech_Male> in the US have died <Speech_Male> port of more <Speech_Male> than one, million, <Speech_Male> one, hundred, fifty, <Speech_Male> four, thousand deaths <Silence> around the world. <Speech_Male> Thanks for <Speech_Male> listening to five <Speech_Male> things you can <Speech_Male> subscribe for free <Speech_Male> and also rate <Speech_Male> and review on Apple <Speech_Male> podcasts and <Speech_Male> listen wherever <Speech_Male> you find your audio. <Speech_Male> Thanks as always <Speech_Male> the Clare Thornton <Speech_Male> for her work on the show <Speech_Male> and be sure to go <Speech_Male> back and check out. <Speech_Male> Sunday edition <Speech_Music_Male> right here on <Speech_Music_Male> this feed <Speech_Music_Male> five things is <Speech_Music_Male> part of the USA. <Speech_Music_Male> Today. <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Music_Male> PODCAST network. <Music>

CNN Meadows California US Donald Trump Cannes Clare Thornton Joe Biden Pacific Gas San Francisco Mexico Louisiana President Florida USA. Apple
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on 5 Things

5 Things

03:12 min | 4 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on 5 Things

"Some <Speech_Music_Male> of the top headlines, <Speech_Music_Male> they contentious <Speech_Music_Male> sixty minutes <Speech_Music_Male> interview with President <Speech_Music_Male> Donald Trump <Speech_Music_Male> aired Sunday night <Speech_Music_Male> the president <Speech_Music_Male> walked out of the interview <Speech_Music_Male> after increasingly <Speech_Male> growing more <Speech_Music_Male> agitated with <Speech_Music_Male> each question. <Speech_Music_Male> He had leaked footage <Speech_Male> earlier in the week <Speech_Male> and called the interview <Speech_Music_Male> by Leslie. STAHL <Speech_Music_Male> biased <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Music_Male> Australian <Speech_Male> leaders are condemning <Speech_Male> Qatar <Speech_Male> for what are being called <Speech_Male> disturbing exams <Speech_Male> of women <Speech_Male> passengers <Speech_Male> on a flight to Sydney. <Speech_Male> After <Speech_Male> a newborn baby was <Speech_Male> found abandoned <Speech_Male> at Doha airport <Speech_Male> women <Speech_Male> were reportedly taken <Speech_Male> off the plane <Speech_Male> and inspected <Speech_Male> for whether <Speech_Male> they had given birth <Speech_Male> in Qatar <Speech_Male> sex. Outside <Speech_Male> marriage is a criminal <Speech_Male> act. <Speech_Male> Female migrant workers <Speech_Male> have in the past <Speech_Male> abandoned babies <Speech_Male> anonymously <Speech_Male> to avoid <Speech_Male> prison. <Speech_Male> And The Los Angeles <Speech_Male> dodgers are one <Speech_Male> win away from <Speech_Male> their first World Series <Speech_Male> Championship <Speech_Male> since one, thousand, nine, <Speech_Male> hundred, Eighty, eight, <Speech_Male> they're up three games to <Speech_Male> two on the Tampa <Speech_Male> Bay rays game <Speech_Male> six is <Speech_Male> set for Tuesday <Speech_Male> night air <Speech_Male> reminder we're always <Speech_Male> on on twitter <Speech_Male> at USA Today <Speech_Male> podcast where you <Speech_Male> can stay up on <Speech_Male> all things, five things <Speech_Male> and also <Speech_Male> joined the conversation <Speech_Male> with fellow listeners. <Speech_Male> That's <Speech_Male> at USA, <Speech_Male> today podcast <Speech_Male> on twitter <Speech_Male> now <SpeakerChange> under <Speech_Music_Male> <Advertisement> the show. <Music> <Music> <Music> <Music> <Advertisement> <Music> <Advertisement> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Music_Male> Judge <Speech_Male> Amy. Coney Barrett <Speech_Male> on Monday <Speech_Male> is expected to become <Speech_Male> the ninth <Speech_Male> justice on the Supreme <Speech_Male> Court on <Speech_Male> Sunday. Senate <Speech_Male> Republicans voted <Speech_Male> to advance Barrett <Speech_Male> to a final <Speech_Male> confirmation <Speech_Male> despite <SpeakerChange> objections <Speech_Female> from Democrats. <Speech_Female> The as <Speech_Female> fifty one <Speech_Female> nays are forty <Speech_Female> eight. The <Speech_Female> motion <SpeakerChange> is agreed <Speech_Male> to the move <Speech_Male> would give the high court <Speech_Male> a six to three <Speech_Male> conservative majority <Speech_Male> after liberal-leaning <Speech_Male> Justice <Speech_Male> Ruth Bader Ginsburg <Speech_Male> died last <Speech_Male> month Senate <Speech_Male> majority leader Mitch, <Speech_Male> McConnell continued <Speech_Male> to strongly <Speech_Male> endorse Barrett <SpeakerChange> on <Speech_Male> Sunday. The separation <Speech_Male> of powers <Silence> was to endure. <Speech_Male> And <Speech_Male> People's rights <Speech_Male> were, to, be safe. <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> We would need individuals <Speech_Male> of the highest quality. <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> On the courts. <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> So how fortunate <Speech_Male> for our country <Speech_Male> that the Senate just <Speech_Male> advanced? <Speech_Male> One of the <Speech_Male> most qualified nominees <Speech_Male> for judicial <Speech_Male> service that we've seen. <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> In our lifetimes. <Silence> <Speech_Male> Jamie <Speech_Male> Coney, Barrett of <Speech_Male> the US Court of Appeals <Speech_Male> for the seventh circuit. <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> Stellar nominee <Speech_Male> in every <Speech_Male> single <SpeakerChange> respect <Speech_Male> Democrats <Speech_Male> have called out <Speech_Male> Republicans for <Speech_Male> pushing to fill the <Speech_Male> court seat weeks <Speech_Male> before a presidential <Speech_Male> election <Speech_Male> and have expressed <Speech_Male> worries on a <Speech_Male> number of issues <Speech_Male> from abortion <Speech_Music_Male> to healthcare. <Music> <Speech_Music_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Music_Male> Vice <Speech_Male> President Mike Pence <Speech_Male> continues to <Speech_Male> make public appearances <Speech_Male> even <Speech_Male> though members of his staff <Speech_Male> tested positive <Speech_Male> for Covid nineteen <Speech_Male> over the weekend <Speech_Male> at least <Speech_Male> five people in <Speech_Male> Pence's circle tested <Speech_Male> positive including. <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> More short <Speech_Male> pence has since <Speech_Male> tested negative <Speech_Male> and plans to preside <Speech_Male> over the Senate floor <Speech_Male> on Monday <Speech_Male> for the Supreme Court <Speech_Male> confirmation of <Speech_Male> Amy Coney Barrett. <Speech_Male> Some Democrats <Speech_Male> are railing against <Speech_Male> his decision to <Speech_Male> do so calling <Speech_Male> it a responsible <Speech_Male> while many <Speech_Male> Republicans <SpeakerChange> have <Speech_Music_Male> shrugged off concerns. <Music> <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Music_Male> California <Speech_Male>

Coney Barrett Senate President twitter Qatar Doha airport Mike Pence Donald Trump Leslie Ruth Bader Ginsburg US Court of Appeals Amy Coney Barrett. Supreme Court STAHL USA Los Angeles Coney dodgers California Covid
Barrett nomination clears Senate hurdle, putting her on course to confirmation to Supreme Court

Mo'Kelly

00:19 sec | 4 months ago

Barrett nomination clears Senate hurdle, putting her on course to confirmation to Supreme Court

"Says it will move forward with the vote on Supreme Court nominee Amy Cockney Barrett. Senators voted 51 to 48 along party lines to hold bear its final confirmation tomorrow. Barrett Supreme Court nomination has been strongly criticized by Democrat leaders who say Republicans are rushing the process before the November election.

Supreme Court Amy Cockney Barrett
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on WGN Radio

WGN Radio

01:55 min | 4 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on WGN Radio

"Barrett Supreme Court nomination in a key procedural vote earlier today, a final confirmation vote is expected to take place tomorrow. New station reporter Ana War, Niki is in Washington with more It's rare to see senators in session over the weekend, but it just shows how much of a priority it is for Senate Republicans to advance Amy Cockney barrettes Supreme Court nomination as quickly as possible. Senate will come to order. In an unusual Sunday session, the Senate voted 51 to 48 to end debate and schedule A final vote on Judge Amy Cockney barrettes nomination to the U. S. Supreme Court is not something to really Be proud of in the field Good about. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell called the procedural vote a victory. Republicans are on track to confirm buried before election date. I oppose her nomination, Senator Dianne Feinstein says Barrett will allow the court to erase many of the rites. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought to protect its a travesty. A travesty. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer says the Senate should wait until after the election to fill the Supreme Court vacancy, confirming a lifetime appointment. This late into a presidential election season is outrageous. Schumer has repeatedly tried to slow Barrett's confirmation process, including forcing a rare closed session on Friday. Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin says the Senate should be focusing on other issues. The Republican leader Mitch McConnell says we have no time to discuss Koven 19 no. But we have all the time we need to make sure we have our Supreme Court justice on the bench. But McConnell says a full nine member high court must be a priority because of its lasting impact long beyond election date. Senator is doing the right time. We're moving this nomination forward. Senate now has 30 hours to debate barrettes nomination before the final Senate confirmation vote, which McConnell says will take place late Monday..

Senate U. S. Supreme Court Mitch McConnell Judge Amy Cockney Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Senator Senator Dianne Feinstein Barrett Chuck Schumer Dick Durbin reporter Ana War Washington Illinois Niki Koven
Senate advances Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination in key procedural vote

The New Yorker Radio Hour

00:51 sec | 4 months ago

Senate advances Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination in key procedural vote

"And, like Trump, who himself was among multiple people in the White House infected weeks ago. Pence has called for opening up the economy. The U. S. Is undergoing a record surgeon cases.

Donald Trump Pence White House
Senate clears key hurdle to Barrett's Supreme Court nomination

Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network

00:48 sec | 4 months ago

Senate clears key hurdle to Barrett's Supreme Court nomination

"Fire Tomorrow Night Judge Amy Coney Barrett could be an associate justice on the US Supreme Court. Her nomination needs to get over a procedural hurdle today then on Monday final confirmation vote Democrats tried but failed to derail the process Senate Republican Marsha. Blackburn weighing in on Fox and friends is they do not want a female from the Political Center Center right on the Supreme Court they have invested the last forty five years into creating a narratives that you are not fully female in this country unless you've been to the agenda of the left in a surprise announcement yesterday a Republican Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, announced that she would vote guess for Barrett's confirmation. Susan. Collins of Maine. is now the only gop holdout

Judge Amy Coney Barrett Us Supreme Court Lisa Murkowski Senate Political Center Center Marsha Collins Susan Blackburn Alaska FOX Maine.
Senate takes up Barrett nomination, setting up final vote

KQED Newsroom

00:07 sec | 4 months ago

Senate takes up Barrett nomination, setting up final vote

"Cockney Barrett Supreme Court nomination on Thursday, which will lead to a confirmation vote on Monday In state news. A new poll

Barrett Supreme Court
Senate Judiciary Committee sends Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination to full Senate as Democrats boycott vote

News and Perspective with Tom Hutyler

00:14 sec | 4 months ago

Senate Judiciary Committee sends Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination to full Senate as Democrats boycott vote

"Aren't thrilled with Democrats refusing to show up to vote on Judge Amy Cockney barrettes Supreme Court nomination, the Senate Judiciary Committee advancing her nomination to the full Senate, but no Democrats showed up leading Texas Senator Ted Cruz to label the action as a stunt. Couple whose

Senate Judiciary Committee Judge Amy Cockney Senator Ted Cruz Senate Supreme Court Texas
Senate Judiciary Committee approves Amy Coney Barrett's nomination

The Inside Story With Marty Griffin

00:19 sec | 4 months ago

Senate Judiciary Committee approves Amy Coney Barrett's nomination

"Judiciary Committee has advanced Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court nomination to the full Senate. Mr Chairman, the votes or 12 years. 10 no votes. Republicans powered past a democratic boycott of this morning session. To keep confirmation of President Trump's election on track before Election Day. The final confirmation vote is expected Monday.

Judge Amy Cockney Judiciary Committee Mr Chairman President Trump Supreme Court Republicans Senate
Senate Judiciary Committee sends Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination to full Senate as Democrats boycott vote

Morning Edition

05:38 min | 4 months ago

Senate Judiciary Committee sends Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination to full Senate as Democrats boycott vote

"And I'm Noelle King. Good morning, the Senate Judiciary Committee has advanced the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Amy Cockney Barrett. Mr Chairman, the votes for 12 years and 10 not present motion is passed. Thank you. All 12 Republican senators voted for her nomination. The committee's 10 Democrats did not show up. They were boycotting the proceedings. NPR congressional reporter Claudia Gonzales has been following this story and the proceedings. Good morning, Claudia. Good morning. No. Well so fairly short today. This morning. What happened? Yes, it all went by very quickly, all said, and done and under 12 minutes. This is a very traumatic Shift from what we saw last week with hours and hours of testimony at least 20 hours of questioning Barrett by the members on the panel, both Republicans and Democrats, But today Democrats boycotted they did not show up. Republican senators on the Judiciary Committee sidestepped that no show to move barrettes nomination forward to the full Senate. Democrats said they were boycotting because they wanted to highlight the damage that bear it would do to healthcare, reproductive and voting rights and the fact that the vote took place amid a presidential election. And this is one battle. Democrats say perhaps the lose, but they're looking to win a bigger war. Graham alluded to that when he talked about the next vote on the Senate floor. Let's take a listen They started this On May For up to May that be a 60 vote requirement in the Senate today, and he's referring to the Senate filibuster there. This is a requirement of 60 votes that was once needed to approve a nomination like barrettes. But the filibuster was eliminated in 2013 as Democrats struggled to move their judges forward when they control the chamber with the tight margin, So that's what Graham is referencing, and he added later that perhaps this will be addressed again in the future. However, now that the Senate is controlled by Republicans with tight margins, they're able to push through barrettes nomination with just 51 votes. It's a preview of the battles to calm that this will go on after barrettes nomination this conversation even as far as she goes to the floor to be considered by the full Senate, and we see if Democrats ultimately changed the dynamics of power in the Senate or the presidency through the upcoming election day. How did Democrat to respond today? They didn't just say nothing right? Yes, there had been rumors for days that Democrats could boycott these hearings. They were facing a lot of pressure from outside groups to even skip out on the hearings last week questioning their it. But they decided not to do that last week. Instead, they did it to Dae. So later yesterday, they confirmed that they would all not show today they're empty seats were filled instead with images of Americans who have used the affordable care act. This is a case that could become it could be considered before the court next month. And so this is one critical issue They've been highlighting all along. They also held a news conference after the vote. This was led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on the steps of the Capitol is take a listen. The nomination of Amy Cockney Barrel. Is the most illegitimate process I have ever witnessed in the Senate, and her potential confirmation will have dire, dire consequences. For the Senate. With his Supreme Court and our entire country for generations to come. So this was the theme they've been driving through this entire process. Barrett will shift the court to a 63 conservative majority, and they say she's a foe to the affordable care act. The landmark abortion rights case, Roe v. Wade, and she could play a role. If there's a dispute in the election. This is activated activated opposition as well. There were protesters outside the capital. Speaking against this nomination, this resulted in about a half a dozen arrests so far today I spoke to Judiciary Committee Democrat Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut yesterday, said the watchword for them is no more business. As usual. He and the other members have been driving home this point that this is a sham process. It's not normal. It's not writing Americans should see it for what it is and probably see more of this in the coming days, because there is so much acrimony over this nomination. Yes, exactly So many reasons. We're in the midst of a pandemic. We're rushing this through in 30 days, one of the fastest, we've seen the fight over health care. And, of course, you know the division between Republicans and Democrats. Really. Exemplified by President Trump pushing this forward and so there's a long history as well of these fights over the Supreme Court in the controversy surrounding these nominations if we go back to 2016, Democrats try to move forward. President Obama's nominee at the time. This is Judge Merrick. Garland and Republicans refused because they said they were so close to an election months away. But here we are now people are early voting and they're pushing this through. So this is set into motion a series of debates to calm and we're even hearing about it from the Democratic nominee Joe Biden this morning. We understand he told 60 minutes that he's going to create A study a commission to bipartisan commission to study whether they should add more seats to the courts a lot more to come here, including next week, right what happens then? So tomorrow, the nomination for Barrett actually will reach the full Senate floor. It's going to be followed by some procedural votes on Friday, as well as on Sunday. In between, we're going to see a lot of debate an argument back and forth. But the rial final moment for this will come Monday when the full Senate will submit their votes for bear to confirm or vote against her nomination to the Supreme Court. NPR congressional reporter Claudio Gonzalez. Thanks, Claudia. Thanks for having me

Senate Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Senate Judiciary Committee Supreme Court Claudia Gonzales Judiciary Committee NPR Reporter Graham Noelle King Mr Chairman Joe Biden Chuck Schumer Judge Merrick Richard Blumenthal
GOP-led Senate panel advances Barrett despite Dems' boycott

AP News Radio

00:39 sec | 4 months ago

GOP-led Senate panel advances Barrett despite Dems' boycott

"A G. O. P. LED panel has pushed Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination to the full Senate despite a boycott by Democrats we did it Judiciary Committee cheap Lindsey Graham says bear it's going to the Senate floor and then the High Court all the panel's Republicans voted for her this is Feinstein Mr Lee none of its Democrats showed up protesting what they call a rush to get buried ceded the Senate's never confirmed a new Supreme Court justice so close to a presidential election but it's on track for a final vote on it next week after a rare weekend session Sager made ani Washington

Senate Judiciary Committee Sager Ani Washington Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court Lindsey Graham High Court Mr Lee Supreme Court
Senate Judiciary Committee approves Amy Coney Barrett's nomination

Wisconsin's Morning News with Gene Mueller

00:45 sec | 4 months ago

Senate Judiciary Committee approves Amy Coney Barrett's nomination

"Voting on Amy Cockney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination. It has now been sent to the full Senate for confirmation this after the Senate Judiciary Committee did so now it was. There were some issues technically, if you listen to Democrats did not show off. Mr Lady Who's a boycott there, Mr Durbin, so they did not vote. But even still, she has now been passed through the Senate Judiciary Committee donation will be reported favorably to the floor. With the unanimous so senators now plan to convene a rare weekend session for procedural stuff. And then a final confirmation vote is expected

Senate Judiciary Committee Mr Durbin Senate Amy Cockney Barrett Mr Lady Who Supreme Court
Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination moves to full Senate, Dems boycott vote

WBZ Morning News

00:25 sec | 4 months ago

Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination moves to full Senate, Dems boycott vote

"Judiciary Committee Has voted to move forward The nomination of Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court on to the full Senate for a vote next week. Now this morning was notable for its absence of Democrats. They boycotted. The vote today in the Senate Judiciary Committee now officially moving on to the full panel of the Senate. That vote will happen sometime next week. You have the

Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Judiciary Committee Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court
Senate Judiciary Committee to vote on Barrett's nomination

Houston's Morning News

00:15 sec | 4 months ago

Senate Judiciary Committee to vote on Barrett's nomination

"Senate Judiciary Committee said to vote on Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court nomination today High Noon without Democrats, so that maybe they say they're gonna boycott the nomination will go to the Senate tomorrow and a C B should be voted on confirmed on Monday.

Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court
Democrats to boycott Barrett vote, Senate GOP pushes ahead

Joel Riley

00:28 sec | 4 months ago

Democrats to boycott Barrett vote, Senate GOP pushes ahead

"Afternoon. Republicans running the Senate Judiciary Committee have pushed up the vote on any Cockney Barrett Supreme Court nomination will now vote on whether to advance Amy Cockney barrettes nomination shortly after 9 A.m. when the committee convenes on Thursday. Change comes in response to Senate Judiciary Democrats who said they plan on boycotting the vote and in their chairs will be poster sized pictures of Americans that they say will be crushed by Barrett, potentially casting the deciding vote on the affordable Care act. ABC is Mark

Senate Judiciary Committee Cockney Barrett Supreme Court Senate Judiciary Amy Cockney Barrett ABC
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Happy Warrior Podcast

The Happy Warrior Podcast

03:07 min | 4 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Happy Warrior Podcast

"So it is possible for trump wit is realistic that it could happen. I just don't think it's more realistic than the Biden win, but it is a possible thing to do is non impossible. So. That is how the race I think is breakdown right now and who knows what is GonNa come I mean it's been so exciting so far who knows what else twenty twenty has left to dishes out in this campaign season? Hello friends. We are back for my final bit today I. Want to talk a little bit about the Supreme Court Amy Barrett. But more importantly I'm gonNA take that as part of it. I. WanNa talk about big picture what is happening to us right now I'm GonNa talk about big picture what is the future for the West and for America not just our government not just who gets elected but our culture, our beliefs, our values who are the people were going to become. I want to talk about big picture. Values the real purpose. For Life. And so we will we will frame it I this way. The Ama Coney Barrett Supreme Court hearing. That has been going on hearings over the last two weeks. have been excellent. Amy Barrett. Is Wonderful. And some up. Her and what is happening listen to her statement she gives here about the role. Of the Supreme Court courts have a vital responsibility to the rule of law which is critical to a free society. But courts are not designed to solve every problem or right wrong in our public life. The policy decisions and value judgments of government must be made by the political branches elected by and accountable to the people. The public should not expect courts to do so and courts should not try. Ami. Coney. It says there. That is not the courts job to decide the questions in public life. Court should not be dictating how we live our lives public society should function. They're only there to to. Judah Kate in specific cases of the constitution requires they're there to make sure the contracts that we sign the social contracts the laws are followed. That's it. That is their job. Now many people who are not originalist maybe they don't understand the constitution the. Understanding of the Constitution in the history of our republic and the Scottish enlightenment they don't. They don't have a good understanding of..

Amy Barrett Ama Coney Barrett Supreme Cour Supreme Court Biden Coney twenty twenty Judah Kate America
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Happy Warrior Podcast

The Happy Warrior Podcast

05:45 min | 4 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Happy Warrior Podcast

"So that's the tunnel what about the state of the race. So where what are your chances you think of a trump biden victor I think right now at the beginning of last week before big tech before the town halls I would have put trump at a sixteen percent of winning. I'm now at thirty five my reason being is that trump has a lead in Ohio right now he's doing okay in Florida overall, he's doing Oh, can era zona reason why give? A little over a third chance of winning this thing. Is there some interesting data? It doesn't it doesn't overcut the poll. So it's not in the Physi- The polls are completely wrong. But as I told you guys last week, there is some thinking to sink that the polls are ahead for by. Not Far ahead, and there's some interesting data in these states and surveys about American opinions that might persuade me to think that the police wrong in ways that we don't understand you can't understand till after the electric for example, New York posters reporting this majority American? Say in Nepal that they are better under they're better off under trump than they were four years ago. According to this poll fifty, six percent registered voters said they were better off now for thirty two percent who said they were worse off and this is according to Gallup. This is. A good sign. That's a good sign even back in two thousand twelve when Obama was was running remember Obama pull that one off. He only had forty five percent of voters who said they were better than tweet thousand eight. So that might lead you to believe that this is for trump fee Other reason I think trump is a better chance than what the media is giving. Him is due to something called the social desireability bias. The guy that really talks about this topic lot is a pulsar with a pretty successful track record. When he comes predicting presidential elections, the pollster is Robert Haley and he is with organization called Trafalgar Group and he uses some interesting. Methods to figure out who is going to win the race and his biggest part is something called the social desirability bias and the social desirability bias is essentially. The desire of someone to give you the answer that you want to hear a pollster Causey. What they ask your question you have the feel social pressure cultural pressure to tell them. Yes I support Barack Obama, this this social desireability fact it's also sometimes referred to as the Bradley effect going back to the nine hundred ninety s when African American mayor of Los Angeles Tom Bradley underperformed in his polling in that governor race. Other examples of the Bradley effect an IT looked to the twenty eighteen race between Rhonda. Santa's Andrew Gill Rhonda Santa's White Republican Andrew Gillum, Black Democrat and guess who won was wrong. In basically, it's K. Haley puts it. You've gotTa get past what you want to see in public and get to what you really feel because what's in your heart is going to be what's on the ballot. There's also some issue with the polls. With, a bit of a skew because the way the pools work, they often work based on a turnout rate with more Democrats than Republicans and kind of middling of independence and that doesn't always work because that's on the theory that more Democrats are going to turn out for an election because there are more Democrats in the country then Republicans. By population these persuade me we're including what we saw with the town halls and a big tech..

trump Barack Obama Robert Haley Andrew Gill Rhonda Santa biden Florida Tom Bradley Ohio New York Nepal Causey Trafalgar Group Los Angeles Andrew Gillum
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Happy Warrior Podcast

The Happy Warrior Podcast

03:26 min | 4 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Happy Warrior Podcast

"There's a character on that the GRANDPA character Abe Simpson and he likes to speak in long diatribes that meander and kind of go everywhere and yet nowhere it was a lot like that. One trick is to tell them stories that don't go anywhere like the time I caught the ferry over the SHELBYVILLE. Needed a new he'll firm a shoe. So I, decided to go to Morgan Ville, which is what they call. Shelbyville in those days. Tied into my belt, which was style. It's time now to take the ferry Costa Nickel and in those days Nichols head pictures or bumblebees. Give me five piece record or you'd say. Where we? That is fantastic. But really that was the Joe Biden townhall in a nutshell Joe Biden there these key moments where he made some big policy prescriptions and we'll talk about that here in just a second. But overall the majority of the ninety minutes was Abe Simpson Land One of my favorite moments that Abe Simpson land is where someone asks him about gay marriage and he brings up corn. As it Brings Back Corp up I love the corn pop stores from Joe Biden I I need my Joe Biden corn pop stories. It'd be he becomes president. Be a corn pop story every single day. Getting out to get a an application, be a lifeguard in the African American community because there was a swimming pool complex and. And these two men well-dressed leaned up in one kissed one another I'm getting out of the car too late turned to my dad my dad looked joey simple. They love each other. It is nine, thousand, nine, hundred, sixty to the return of corn, pup? I love it. I love it. Oh, man. The only good thing that comes out of this reality we live in is corn pop. I just love corn pop moments in politics American politics these days with the weirdoes that we keep putting forward for leaders. This is the best thing you get from this America you need more of this because I mean, this is what you can look forward to if you need a positive, even want the silver. Oh. My God. That's Okay. All right. All right. All right back to the brass tacks. So Korn, Papa side the serious moments that did happen that night. Should be a little bit disconcerting. They were great for the job and campaign I can't say the town hall did anything wealth for him but I'm not sure it necessarily hurt him too much. But there were some aspects particularly if you are heterodox thinker if you're concerned about the issue of trans, kids or the second amendment. Joe Biden townhall did major damage on those specific issues. And these segments sure going to go viral on social it well, they would. You know for social me overlords allowed such things go. Their people will try to make ads them and the like. So we'll do two more clips Joe Biden. One that should be disconcerting is that JOE BY AND Says it he just says the subtext out loud..

Joe Biden Abe Simpson SHELBYVILLE Morgan Ville Korn Costa Nickel Back Corp Nichols America joey
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Happy Warrior Podcast

The Happy Warrior Podcast

04:15 min | 4 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Happy Warrior Podcast

"Podcast in today's episode. Yes, we told you. So start out discuss the biggest story of the week. How big tech has become big brother indefens- at the Joe Biden campaign and how that puts all of our Internet freedoms perhaps even democracy itself at risk. This whole story is frigging ridiculous and we will be getting into the INS and outs and what you need to learn from this case, then we will be jumping into the state of. The presidential race between Joe Biden and Donald Trump we'll be discussing those interesting town halls took place this week including one in which it was the president in a debate with the moderator, and finally we will discuss what happened this week of the Supreme Court hearings for a seat be and try.

Joe Biden Donald Trump Supreme Court president indefens
Demonstrators gather for Women's March in Washington, D.C.

All Things Considered

00:57 sec | 4 months ago

Demonstrators gather for Women's March in Washington, D.C.

"Women's rights advocates marched in Washington and around the country today in opposition to Trump Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Cockney Barrett As NPR's Sarah McCammon reports, The marches were as much a get out the vote rally as a protest. Barring some surprise, Senate Republicans have the votes to push through Judge Barrett Supreme Court confirmation before Election Day. Aggressive activists are using the moment to remind Democratic voters to turn out for the November election, hears Jenny Lawson of Planned Parenthood Votes speaking in Washington, D C. It is not hyperbole to say that everything is on the line this November. We cannot afford four more years of this administration, attacking our access to reproductive healthcare and writes wearing masks. Thousands of demonstrators marched to the National Mall outside the Supreme Court, anti abortion rights activists and other groups demonstrated in support of Judge Barrett. Sarah McCammon. NPR NEWS Washington

Supreme Court Barrett Supreme Court Judge Amy Cockney Barrett Sarah Mccammon Washington Judge Barrett NPR Jenny Lawson Senate Donald Trump National Mall
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Diane Rehm Show

The Diane Rehm Show

04:52 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Diane Rehm Show

"Sometimes, historically mean you're probably familiar with the The famous switch in time that saves nine, which was during the FDR administration There was a similar situation, right you had a supreme court that was out of step with popular opinion. You had a threat of cart court packing from Franklin, Delano Roosevelt, and the court at at the eleventh hour began upholding new deal programs. Now, you can say, maybe that wasn't just about the threat of court. Packing. But it's reasonable to assume that that was certainly irrelevant factor and so the kind of best case scenario for making the court partisan is that some of these conversations we're having make their way back to the justices and they see that there's something very wrong with how people are understanding their role in our democracy and they try to act accordingly. Right they tried to kind of dial back the temptation to decide things more partisan or aggressive way. But I think. I'm the lawyer. So I still I might be naive about this to a point but I think that there are times when judges are really trying to do the right thing and interpret the law and we see examples of that I doubt very much that Neil. Gorsuch is a profound believer in lgbt rights and yet he. wrote an opinion this summer holding the title seven recognized those rights. So I think there's some value in keeping the court and asking the court not to be partisan but I think sometimes, you have to almost have kind of political hardball threats to make that happen. She has said she will be justice in the pattern set by Justice Scalia. Is So hard in twenty twenty to think. Justice going on the court saying I, am an originalist. What in God's name does that mean in twenty twenty? Well I think originalism. It's actually interesting. Diane Kiss. I. Think for a longtime originalism was sort of winning the public opinion worse for the court. Living Constitutionalism was not popular among voters if you pulled people. Liberals were doing originalism. Right. There would be fights about you know do the framers thank you win I win and I think one of the side effects of people becoming aware that the court is partisan is skepticism that originalism is somehow not a political project right that it's I. think that's growing. I think the problem of course is that originalism is not neutral, right? It can't be I'm a professional historian right? There's no way that you can get objective answers to what people thought or the original public meaning of text was and of course, there's a obvious reason why conservatives are attracted to originalism, which is that most of the time originalism will give you a conservative answer right I mean, and that's not an accident. So there are people who are attracted to originalism legitimately because they think it's better than the other jurisprudential alternatives but the more partisan we think the court is the more difficult. It is to to listen to hearings with the State Street face where someone tells you that originalism is somehow related to the reasons politically that amy conybeare was chosen, which of course is not true. So I think part of what's also on the line here. Is Not just the legitimacy of the court but the legitimacy of projects like originalism which make claims to be. You know legal constitutional projects, not just.

originalism FDR Delano Roosevelt Justice Scalia Gorsuch Franklin amy conybeare Diane Kiss
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

Diane Rehm: On My Mind

05:51 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

"I'm not a fan of cord packing because. As Mark Titian. At Harvard puts it leads to a downward spiral like. If the Democrats packed the court obviously Mitch McConnell. No qualms about packing the court and so I don't see where that logically ends. The court you know being the size of the Senate or something. I just don't know it makes the court into a partisan institution in a way that might be unimaginable to us. During this conversation I think term limits are a better idea in part because part of what incongruous is, how long justices can stay on the bench after their views don't line up with popular opinion. So if Amy Conybeare, it sits on. The bench until she's eighty seven, which was when we lost Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg it will be twenty, fifty nine now maybe in twenty sixteen people wanted Supreme Court justice picked by Donald Trump but it seems unreasonable to expect that they would want that in two thousand and one, thousand nine. So term limits seem to me to be a better way of. Giving the court, some protection of course, we don't want them to be elected then there would be even more partisan to giving them some insulation from popular pressure while at the same time recognizing that. Their lifetime appointment. so any sense that people were voting for a specific person to put people on the Supreme Court Stops Making Sense Fifteen, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty years after the fact, and so I think the gap we see now between popular will and the Supreme Court would potentially close a little bit. If we had some kind of term, limit wealth need to happen for the court to become a less political institution. That's hard to say I. Mean I, think. The threat of backlash and the threat of cord packing have. made the court less partisan institution. Because I think. The justices who are cynics don't WANNA lose their power and the justices who are not synnex don't want to be viewed as cynics so..

Supreme Court Amy Conybeare Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Mark Titian Mitch McConnell Donald Trump Senate Harvard
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

Diane Rehm: On My Mind

04:45 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

"They committed was a dangerous felony and I think this was striking to some commentators because this is not a universally held even by conservatives or by originalists who are, conservatives. They would, for example, Antonin Scalia her mentor in the Heller case which gave to the idea of an individual right to bear arms around said that as examples of limits you could place on that individual righty said limiting gun ownership for the mentally ill and for felons would be something that would be permissible as a matter of law in a matter of original intent and Amy Kuney Barrett didn't seem to share that view at least for certain. Classes of Felon and so what that tells you all likelihood is that she is not just going to be a voice for gun rights on the court, but probably to the extreme right end of the spectrum on that issue. To. The extreme right in what is that mean ultimately meaning that we we know very little about where the Supreme Court is going to go on guns. Right? We have an all we know is that you can't stop people from having a gun in the home that's it. The Supreme Court has never weighed in on other gun regulations at all, and so that leaves lots of ranges of options for the Supreme Court's Conservative members about which gun regulations are. Okay in about how closely. Courts should scrutinize any gun regulation and they're going to be some conservatives who are kind of Second Amendment absolutist who are concerned about any gun regulation, and there might be others who are certainly protective of gun rights but will allow for certain reasonable regulations in if amy cody Barrett is breaking from her mentor on some of the examples he said were the most obvious regulations that were okay under the Second Amendment that would make you think she was the second amendment absolutist and would be. disinclined to uphold most if any gun regulations. So. What do you think her rise to the court could mean for the court in the.

Supreme Court Amy Kuney Barrett Antonin Scalia Heller
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Diane Rehm Show

The Diane Rehm Show

03:17 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Diane Rehm Show

"Limiting gun ownership for the mentally ill and for felons would be something that would be permissible as a matter of law and as a matter of original intent and Amy Kuney Barrett didn't seem to share that view at least for certain. Classes of Felon, and so what that tells you in all likelihood is that she is not just going to be a voice for gun rights on the court, but probably to the extreme right end of the spectrum on that issue. To the extreme right and what is that mean ultimately meaning that we know very little about where the Supreme Court is going to go on guns right? We haven't. All we know is that you can't stop people from having a gun in the home that's it. The Supreme Court has never waiting on other gun regulations at all, and so that leaves lots of ranges of options for the Supreme Court's Conservative members about which gun regulations are okay and about how closely courts should. Scrutinize any gun regulation and there are going to be some conservatives who were kind of second amendment absolute us who are concerned about any gun regulation and there might be others who are certainly protective of gun rights but will allow for certain reasonable regulations in if Amy Barrett is breaking from her mentor on some of the examples he said we're the most obvious regulations that were okay under the Second Amendment that would make you think she was the second amendment absolutist and would be. disinclined uphold most if any gun regulations. So. What do you think her rise to the court could mean for the court in the long run? Well I. Think if she is what the president and her supporters expect her to be it will mean the possibility of a court that is much more aggressively and vocally conservative than the one we have now. Bought could that in I think it would mean potentially. Rulings that are more obviously an easily to understand to be conservative right? We were speaking earlier about John Roberts who is very much a conservative but he's also a crafty conservative who will write opinions that are conservative in a way that the public doesn't understand to be either that far right or really to have done that much I think bear it is more likely to be someone like Clarence Thomas. Who makes no apologies for what she's doing. It as a matter of principle, which means, for example, outcomes that are more likely including things like the overturning, of Roe, or the overturning of the ACA or the overturning over. In a way that the public could understand and appreciate without needing to talk to somebody like me I like John Roberts is the one defining what you're doing. You will often need an expert to come on and say what just happened here I think Barrett will create a or help to create a kind of faction on the court to press for more. Direct. More rapid more conservative change whether that happens. Immediately I think remains to be seen because we still have folks like bread Kevin..

Supreme Court Amy Kuney Barrett John Roberts president Clarence Thomas Roe ACA
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

Diane Rehm: On My Mind

04:52 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

"He's interested in kind of restoring his reputation as someone who's not a partisan that doesn't mean I think both of them would probably happily cast a vote to overturn roe but how and when that happens and the extent to which they would trigger a backlash I think would concern both of them. The other variable is not just popular opinion of Joe. Biden wins, of course, is the prospect of the composition of the Supreme Court would change more than in my entire career. We're seeing a progressive propose everything from term limits for sitting justices To court packing or adding new members of the court, and so I think that could have an effect too because of course, if to the extent conservative justices have a way, they wanna see the law change or an agenda. They won't be able to carry that out very easily if they're four or five or however many new liberal justices added to the court. So both of those things might make the court or at least some members of the court inclined to proceed more cautiously whether it comes to row or any other kind of major case. Wouldn't turn limits. Grandfather knows already seated justices thorough variety of proposals floating around but the term limits bill that's been proposed would grandfather in the sitting justices so that's more of a long term structural reform project versus adding new justices to the court, which would, of course, be effective immediately and changed the kinds of decisions. The court would render immediately on the issue of for Roe v Wade and Brown v Board of Education Amy Klobuchar certainly had a very strong exchange with judge Eric what did you make that up well I think two things Maybe conybeare did said Brown v Board wasn't settled than we would probably dedicate the entire conversation to that right I mean that's probably the one point of common ground between Legal Conservatives and Progressives and folks in the middle I think what it suggested to me was that bear its view of when president. deserves. Respect doesn't have much to do with whether the Supreme Court Has Ernie reaffirmed it which means of course that has consequences for cases like Roe which have been reaffirmed and other divisive cases to it also means that she seems to pay attention to political controversy in doing a precedent to be settled right so she she saying now Legal. School segregation is sort of point of political consensus across the ideological spectrum abortion is not and that means that Roe is unsettled..

Supreme Court roe Joe Grandfather Biden Amy Klobuchar Ernie Brown conybeare Board of Education Eric president. Wade
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Diane Rehm Show

The Diane Rehm Show

04:02 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Diane Rehm Show

"The legal conservative movement is dead saying that social conservatives would stay home and abandon Donald Trump if not given better supreme court nominees. So Amy Conybeare it is in some ways fulfilment of trump's promised to quote unquote do better when it comes to Supreme Court nominees and you might ask, well, what what makes her different and I think in part it's her biography right? The assumption that. She's pro-life. She's devoutly Catholic. She seems to live those values and that she will vote those values will shape how she votes. So even though all judges I think to some degree sincerely try not to have their personal beliefs shape their jurisprudence. Of course, they do, which is why you know Ruth Bader Ginsburg didn't retire during Donald Trump's administration and you won't see if Joe Biden is elected Clarence Thomas won't be. Retiring than either so her personal views had everything to do with her selection and we have reason to believe as is the case with all judges that they'll make some difference when she's on the bench, it fiend she is contract and it certainly looks as though she will be how quickly do you expect a challenge to Roe v way to come before the court there's one the court could take as soon as. She shows up. So Mississippi has a law banning abortion at fifteen weeks. The court has been basically deciding not to decide whether to hear it. So we know now that they will not make a decision one way or another whether to take that case until both after the election, and after in all likelihood Amy Kuney Barrett joins the court it's worth being clear that the core doesn't need to be hearing a challenge For example, to a heartbeat ban to overturn Roe v Wade any abortion case, the court hears gives them an opportunity to overturn Roe v Wade. Now, I don't think it's worth saying I don't think it's going to happen that quickly and we can talk about how it's likely to happen but that's the on a timeline. The soonest we could see something people have talked to great deals especially in the last few years. How public opinion and to what extent public opinion really does affect the outcome of court decisions if Donald Trump were to lose, would you expect that that in fact could affect sitting justices because as we know seventy percent of the American public believe Roe v Wade should stand. So might his defeat affect how sitting jealousies is feel or at on Roe v Wade I think so I mean it's certainly possible. I would save for someone like chief, Justice Roberts who's concerned when you say he is concerned with the legacy or institutional legitimacy of the court you can't understand what that means. Without thinking about popular opinion right and I would probably put bread Kavanagh in that category to in part because his confirmation hearings were so disastrous I think he's interested in kind of restoring his reputation as someone who's not a partisan that doesn't mean I think both of them would probably happily cast a vote to overturn roe but how and when that happens and the extent to which they would trigger a backlash I think would concern both of them. The other variable is not just popular opinion of Joe Biden Wins, of course, the prospect that the composition of the Supreme Court would. Change more than in my entire career. We're seeing progressives propose everything from term limits for sitting justices to court packing, adding new members of the court, and so I think that could have an effect too because of course, if to the extent conservative justices have away, they want to see the law change or an agenda they won't be able to carry out very easily if they're four or five or however many new liberal justices added to the court. So both of those things might make the court or at least some members of the court inclined to proceed..

Supreme Court roe Amy Conybeare Donald Trump Wade Joe Biden Ruth Bader Ginsburg Amy Kuney Barrett Mississippi Justice Roberts Clarence Thomas Kavanagh
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

Diane Rehm: On My Mind

02:43 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

"She didn't want to answer that either because then that would open the door to potentially other questions she didn't answer. So the idea I think if you were being sympathetic to her would be that she just didn't want to answer anything even softball questions but I think that had. The effect of making it seem that she thought certain things that should not be contested and should not be hard questions were things that were were thinking about and might end up before the courts including the president unilaterally delaying an election and so that sort of thing I think was concerning. Of course, we might be reading too much into it, but it certainly gives one pause you wrote earlier that we. Should pay attention special attention to the phrases settled law and starring decides his explain why. So of course, one of the things everybody wants to know would be whether a justice spirit would reverse some of the court's landmark decisions on everything from abortion to the affordable care act to same sex marriage, and often you'll see senators fishing for information about that and justice dispirit used words like precedent and super precedent. And while these things are not particularly clear, you can sort of read between the lines. So one of the things I noticed was that Barrett wouldn't treat Roe v Wade as super precedent or settled law even though the Supreme Court has reconsidered and reaffirmed Roe far more I think than almost any other president and so Barrett's definition of a super precedent or settled law was one that had sort of stopped being contentious essentially when no one was fighting about it anymore, and if that's your definition of settled law, there's almost no settled law right? I mean. There's certainly is no settled law in the context of Culture Wars The Supreme Court has failed to settle and will continue to fail to settle our most deeply felt fights. That's almost inevitable but it does mean that Barrett at least sees as possible a possibility, the reconsideration of Roe v Wade, the reconsideration of obergefell versus hodges the Supreme Court, same sex marriage ruling, and potentially a lot more she. She wouldn't even really commit to the idea that the court's rulings on contraception were settled law. What I find hard to understand is what about her writings in the past, for example, on abortion on same sex marriage? What does that tell us and why cannot those writings be regarded as her positions?.

Supreme Court Barrett Roe president softball Wade hodges
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Diane Rehm Show

The Diane Rehm Show

05:40 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on The Diane Rehm Show

"Diane, what my mind eight Makoni Barrett appears headed for confirmation. In. Recent Years Supreme Court nominees given away very little during their and hearings in Makoni. Barrett was no exception but her pats, the bench was nearly insured even before the hearings began. And now it appears you'll be on the court head at the presidential election something Senate leader Mitch McConnell and president trump promised to make happen. So. What are we to take away from the hearings? And did Amy Coney Barrett say anything that would be okay. What kind did just fueled be. I ask Mary Ziegler Professor. At lert State University College of Law and the author of abortion and America. A legal history wrote the wait to the prednisone. We.

Amy Coney Barrett pats Supreme Court Mitch McConnell lert State University College prednisone Mary Ziegler Diane Senate Makoni trump America president Professor
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

Diane Rehm: On My Mind

04:40 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Diane Rehm: On My Mind

"Hi Diane on my mind eight Makoni Barrett appears headed for confirmation. In recent years, Supreme Court is given away their little during their as an adherent in Makoni? AROD. Was No exception. But her pats, the bench was nearly insured even before the hearings began. And now it appears you'll be on the court. At the presidential election something Senate leader Mitch McConnell and President Trump has promised to make happen. So, what a week to take away from the hearings and did Amy Coney Barrett say anything never be what kind of justice fueled be I ask Mary Ziegler Professor Lert, State University College of Law and the author of abortion and America a legal. Row the wait to the. In. We.

Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court pats Mary Ziegler Professor Lert Mitch McConnell Diane President Trump Makoni Senate State University College of La America
Final day of Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation hearings

Joel Riley

00:15 sec | 5 months ago

Final day of Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation hearings

"Today's the last day of the Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court confirmation hearings. The meeting of the Senate Judiciary Committee will begin at the top of the hour. The 48 year old conservative judge was nominated by President Trump to fill the seat of the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg and is expected to be confirmed by the GOP controlled Senate.

Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Co Senate Judiciary Committee Ruth Bader Ginsburg Senate President Trump GOP
Senate Begins Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

Curtis Sliwa

00:43 sec | 5 months ago

Senate Begins Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

"For Supreme Court nominee Amy Cockney, Barrett continues. Fox's Gurnal Scott has this life Lise As Judge Barrett listens. Senators are seeming to fire comments about her nomination, not at her, but at each other New Jersey Democrat Cory Booker says Republicans are rushing this nomination as America votes for one goal, subvert the will of the American people and overturned the A and overturn Roe v. Wade. Republican Joni Ernst of Iowa, says Democrats are getting personal trying to discredit the nominee. Attacking you as a mom and a woman of faith because they cannot attack your qualifications today is reserved for opening remarks. Questioning starts tomorrow. Lisa thanks, Colonel

Judge Barrett Joni Ernst Amy Cockney Cory Booker Supreme Court Lise Gurnal Scott ROE New Jersey FOX Lisa Iowa America
Senate Begins Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

Lewis and Logan

00:29 sec | 5 months ago

Senate Begins Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

"And Republicans are painting different pictures of Supreme Court nominee Amy Cockney Barrett on the first day of her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing today. In a stark assessment, Republican Mike Leigh said it's not Barrett's job to assure lawmakers one way or another. I will object anyone any time anyone tries to attribute to you a policy position and hold you to that. Democrats worry Barrett would cast the deciding vote to strike down the affordable care act and showed pictures and told stories of those with pre existing conditions. Aaron Carter Ski ABC NEWS New York

Amy Cockney Barrett Senate Judiciary Committee Mike Leigh Supreme Court Aaron Carter New York
"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Newsradio 950 WWJ

Newsradio 950 WWJ

02:25 min | 5 months ago

"barrett supreme court" Discussed on Newsradio 950 WWJ

"Washington. Both President Trump and his doctors say he is improving. But the White House physician also makes clear the president is not out of the woods as he battles covert 19 at Walter Reed Military Medical Center. This was how Mr Trump personally summarize things. I just want to tell you that I'm starting to feel Good. The president tweeted out a four minute video. He insists that he is feeling better. But he acknowledged that the wheel test lies in the days ahead of The Associated Press reports that Chief of staff Mark Meadows says that the next 48 hours will really be critical in terms of the president's care No. During the press conference, the president's physician would not acknowledge whether the president had received oxygen. But CBS News has learned that the president received oxygen here in the White House. Before heading to Walter Reed, White House correspondent Paul Reid and give him the conflicting information given out earlier about the president's condition. CBS News Medical correspondent Dr Jon Lapook says transparency is so important at this uncertain time and at the top of my list is what it is chest imaging show. I mean, we know that covert attacks the lungs, what was his CT scan? What was his chest X ray? You would think if they were normal. And they would be shouting that result from the top of the roof tops, But we haven't heard anything about those results. Turning to some of the political fallout from the president's hospitalization. Democratic nominee Joe Biden has pulled some anti trump commercials. But there is now a new focus on a White House about a week ago announcing Amy Cockney Barrett Supreme Court nomination. Several prominent Republicans who were there, in addition to Mr Trump have now tested positive for covert 19 and soul. Democrats called it reckless to hold bear it's confirmation hearing as scheduled in nine days, arguing if it's too dangerous to have the Senate in session. It is also too dangerous for committee hearings to continue. But Republicans who see a chance to move the court to the right insists the committee can take precautions, with some senators appearing remotely if needed. Correspondent Nancy Court It's a high profile quarterback has been infected. All was supposed to provide an escape from the pandemic, but there's no escaping this. Jim becomes the first starting quarterback to test positive for Cove in 19 and tomorrow's marquee matchup between New England and kids, a city postponed the NFL says both teams are now performing additional tests on players and coaches. Correspondent Daniel Bacchus in horse racing..

president Mr Trump White House correspondent White House Walter Reed Military Medical C Nancy Court Walter Reed CBS News CBS Joe Biden Supreme Court Daniel Bacchus Washington. Senate Dr Jon Lapook The Associated Press Mark Meadows Amy Cockney