17 Burst results for "Baker Mccabe"

"baker mccabe" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

News 96.5 WDBO

07:00 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

"Bill Hemmer talking about the Russia probe investigating the best to Gators how it started the beginning. And now we're seeing Komi Clapper James Baker McCabe. And of course, Brennan, seemingly subtly directly turning on each other on the germination of the Russia probe, how it grew about it, and what did they do? And I'm going to go back to this AT's go back to Bill Hemmer, but I wanna start here, and that is investigating the investigators first off on the news that the president soccer to be happy about details. Thanks to judge Michael Flynn and his cooperation talked about a lawyer Colin Michael Flynn and saying, a Trump lawyer. Listen, we'll to essentially, I hope you'll continue to say the right things. The president has been very nice to you. What he's saying that similarly was from John Dowd, so more stuff on Michael Flynn, and what he knew. And no one says it was collusion, but in terms of -struction, I don't have any interest in obstruction because it was no collusion. There's no underlying crime, just want to tell you, I wanna give you a sense of balance, but I also want to give you an idea of what Clapper Komi Rosenstein. Those guys were tight. They'll watch each other's back, man. They knew what was happening, and it was all Donald Trump. He's the guilty one. But now we find out that Komi is telling people Komi is telling people that it was Brennan, who pushed to use the dossier as part of their investigation, and then Brennan, saying you kidding me. It's not me. It wasn't me. It was Komi really. And then it was Komi that was briefed by James Baker and said, hey, you know as a cow. Counsel to the FBI. I recommend James Komi. You don't briefed president elect Trump because he's going to think it's the days of J Edgar Hoover that you're trying to bully him into saying something by saying that. I got this news on you, as if you're going to extort him. And we remember the controversy there now we turned out the guys are turning on each other. So Bill bar is a real attorney general, unlike Jeff Sessions, who recused himself stayed out of this in focus on other things. Here's a little Bill bars interview with Bill Hemmer colon in the period of time between election day and the inauguration did anyone in government or an intelligence, did they take action to justify their decisions. I think there was some very strange developments during that period. That's one of the things we wanna look into such as such as the handling of the meeting on January six between the intelligence chiefs, and the president and the leaking of information subsequent to that meeting. Yeah. A lot of it. He's using legalese but he's saying what went into that Ari Fleischer wait in which on last night. And he talked about the transition, regardless of the election prisoner Bama crush at the man, he mocked that he predicted would never be president was release replacement cut nine people criticize President Trump for breaking the norms of Washington DC on the smooth words of Barack Obama, what you really had was the rois transition in American history. One administration. The outgoing one was so shocked about who won that they did everything in their power during the transition to undermine him, including us in the secret state powers of the government to undermine him leak information, unmask officials and leak that information not to mention release classified phone calls to foreign leaders. All of this took place. It did. And that's the tradition. All of a sudden, the president's applause out with the Australian leader about refugees they're sticking with sticking on us that they wouldn't put in their country. The prisoner bum allowed to. Go in his so they have a blow up, and guess what become front page news, because there's somebody inside leaking stuff to the outside. More from Bill bore cut to two very unusual situation to have opposition research like that, especially one that on its face had a number of clear mistakes. Do you smell a rat, and this at this point, I don't know if I described rat, I would just say that the, the answers, I'm getting are not sufficient. Wow. That's pretty direct, isn't it? How about the fact is they're both to blame the other one that it even got out. More from Bill bore here bar has been talking about trying to get answers about the mother investigation, and he just cannot get all the pieces to line up and fit together. That's a nice way saying somebody better be start talking quick. Cut three. I've been trying to get answers the questions and I found that a lot of the answers have been attic inadequate. And I. Also found that some of the explanations, I've gotten don't hang together. So in a sense, I have more questions today than I did. When I first started some of what things don't hang together. Some of the explanations of what occurred, why does that matter? Because I think people have to find out what the government was doing during that period. If we're if we're worried about foreign influence for the very same reason we should be worried about whether government officials abused their power and put their thumb on the scale. And, and so I'm not saying that happened. But I'm saying that we have to look at that. Yeah. I think he's saying it probably happened. This would I think he's talked to Michael Horowitz got briefed on the inspector general's report already and weeks ago he dispatched the US attorney if he thought Horowitz answered all the questions and Muller answered all the questions, he wouldn't have used John Dunham in Connecticut as a as a US attorney, this something about that he wants to get to the bottom of this. We've been saying along the. The only explanation and the FBI she come clean on this. They lay out what they thought and how they were wrong and would have said, if you knew what we knew you would have done the same thing. I don't agree with it, but they have to come clean on. They use. Stefan helper on Papadopoulos as a undercover agent. I believe they're going to find out that down as an ambassador, who was a foreign minister, had so many hoax internationally located in London. They used him to. I'm going to. Yeah. I was actually going to play, George Papadopoulos. Hold off on that. Because what I wanted to is, I don't to short change, Admiral James, Debbie this because we're in a situation right now. I find fascinating. We have spotted according to the New York Times, verify, by the White House video surveillance video, it's going to be released on Tuesday that shows Arana arming their ships with missiles, and heading right where our ships or now, they're saying they didn't response to what they saw was our provocative actions, regardless, how close are we to shooting war? I'll talk to Admiral James Jovita about that. And play more on investigating the investigators. A busy Friday..

president Bill Hemmer President Trump James Komi Komi Clapper James Baker McCab Michael Flynn Clapper Komi Rosenstein Bill Brennan FBI Russia Colin Michael Flynn Bill bar Trump AT Admiral James Jovita John Dowd soccer Ari Fleischer George Papadopoulos
"baker mccabe" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

Newsradio 1200 WOAI

11:03 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

"You were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one and Uganda with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you want to get from James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believed rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We our previous deposition was cut off early. We go we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus. And those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know James baker's under criminal investigation chief counsel to Jim commes FBI is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does their job does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more. Jim Jordan of Ohio, congressman, Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. Thank you. Thanks so much. All right. So Baker is the chief counsel commes top attorney, the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is his deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. But Jim Baker is the subject of an investigation in the eight by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Mark. And I did earlier this week to to Mr. Durham US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins. We lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are two being when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker. And discover that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media and you're asking for request. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this FIS application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it then any way never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed an a conscious act of fraud against the court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what what we're seeing. Now is is more more information comes out. And Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know, that bias is creeping in and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was. Based on a dossier. That was not only unproven parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be that if now now I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday, I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth that conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and bladder MIR Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything, and that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump. All of them. And what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high positions to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as a president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's the way. I look at it who and win. So the New York Times had their big story. There blockbuster story that they said on on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who is under investigation. Jim Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who. Animus they had against the president. Those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen with Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Mueller special counsel? Kobe gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and pay their best pal. Jim Kobe gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're gonna talk and rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein do? This is what we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record the president and talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days scrub people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who the people had as extreme. And two other people who were under investigation. Jim Baker, by the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of 'em that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So. What did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to imple- trait every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the molar investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back, then and different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth the open the investigation crossfire, hurricane the open investigation into President Trump at the July, July thirty first we think people remember the fires. It doesn't happen. -application doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce door is our Justice department. High officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back. At the same time. They all. And it goes it goes back, even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce or and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Muller without. We've got that. Prove that you're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows..

FBI James Baker president Jim Baker President Trump general Bruce chief counsel rod Rosenstein Sean Baker McCabe Jim Jordan Mark meadows Christopher Steele Jim general counsel Fox News DOJ fraud Jim Kobe Uganda
"baker mccabe" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

Newsradio 970 WFLA

10:41 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

"Statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We our previous deposition was cut off early. We we we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meaning that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed doors. Meeting and interview with James Baker. We now know James Baker is under criminal investigation. Use the chief counsel to Jim commes FBI is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program, John, thanks so much. All right. So baker. Is the chief counsel commes top attorney the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is his deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're going to find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had Marin closed doors. Then Baker go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of the investigation is the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Mark. And I did earlier this week to the to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on. Here. We want to know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins. We lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are to being when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who was the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins Cooley and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI and also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigate. Active and prosecutorial, practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act. The committees learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce sore took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker and discovered that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media and you're asking for request. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this FIS application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it. Then anyway. Never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed an a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what what we're seeing now is more and more information comes out and Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is. The predicates to the investigation to the application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be that? If if now now, I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday, I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch on from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired out of whole cloth. The conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place in insurance policy. Media leaks strategy this is after we now know that the FBI. What we really have here. If we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them, and what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as a president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's a look at it who and win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbuster store that they said on on Friday. You got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who is under investigation. Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what animus they had against the president. Those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen when Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name a special counsel. Kobe gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and take their best. How Jim Komi gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're going to tie rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein, do just what we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record the president and talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice. Highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight stroke people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had extreme bias and two other people who were under investigation AB McCabe, and Jim Baker, by the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I am getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of 'em that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to infiltrate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the molar investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about. Bruce or met with Christopher Steele, July thirtieth open the investigation caused by hurricane the open investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the defies. It. Doesn't happen. Deprecating doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce Justice department, high officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back this same time. They owned by. And it goes it goes back, even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information. So Robert Muller through Bruce order, and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Muller without we've got tangled brings that proved that you're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows..

FBI James Baker president President Trump Jim Baker general Bruce sore Baker McCabe Jim Jordan chief counsel Mark meadows Christopher Steele Sean fraud Pfizer court Jim general counsel Robert Muller Jim Komi Fox News DOJ
"baker mccabe" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

News Radio 810 WGY

11:33 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on News Radio 810 WGY

"Jane FBI. Based on that without sharing. We didn't. Is based on testimony today. Some of the FIS afoot knows democrat. Inconsistently testimony. The FBI knowing more about. So you you were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one in Uganda with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you want to get from James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believes rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president you gotta take that with the weight that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We are previous deposition was cut off early. We we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know James Baker is under criminal investigation. He was the chief counsel to Jim commes FBI. Is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. Thanks so much. All right. So baker. Is the chief counsel commes top attorney the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is his deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of the investigation in the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Mark. And I did earlier this week to the to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins coup. We lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are to be when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who was the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI and also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ FBI departed from traditional investigate. And prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker and discovered that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media, and you're asking for requests. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it. Then anyway. Never verifying corroborating knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what what we're seeing. Now is is more and more information comes out. And Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI James Baker. Getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we found that James Baker. Bruce, or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know, that bias is creeping in and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the FIS application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven. Problematic. So wouldn't that be that? If if now now, I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday, I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch on from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth. The conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them, and what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high positions to do so. And help lary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then hurt him as a president, which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's a look at it who in win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbuster story that they said on on Friday. You gotta remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who is under investigation. Jim Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what the animus they had against the president. Those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen. Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name a special counsel Komi gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and page their best how Jim Komi gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're gonna tie rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein, do just what we also learned from Jim baker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice. Highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days from people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme bias and two other people who were under investigation Apia Jim Bakker Baker, by the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of 'em that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to imple- trait every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the molar investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about. Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth you open the investigation. My hurricane the open investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the FIS it defies. It. Doesn't happen. Deprecating doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce doors Justice department, high officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back the same time. They all and it goes it goes back, even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, Bruce, or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce or and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Muller without got. We've got numbers that proved that exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows..

FBI James Baker president Jim Baker President Trump chief counsel general Bruce Jim Jordan rod Rosenstein Sean Baker McCabe Mark meadows Christopher Steele Jim Jim Komi DOJ general counsel Jim Bakker Baker Robert Muller Fox News
"baker mccabe" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

11:09 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"More about. So you were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you want to get from James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believed rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. Our previous deposition was cut off early. We we we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're gonna ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's gonna be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus. And those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know James is under criminal investigation. The chief counsel to Jim commes FBI is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does their job does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. Thanks so much. All right. So baker. Is the chief counsel commes top attorney the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is his deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of an investigation at the by the US attorney in Connecticut. That was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Barkan idea earlier this week to to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on. Here. We want to know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was. That Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins. Lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are two when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation of President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker and discovered that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media, and you're asking for requests. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this FIS application was fraudulent and that they knew it was bought and paid for and they used it. Then anyway. Never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed an a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what we're seeing now is more and more information comes out and Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in and what we're finding is. Predicate to the investigation to the application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be if now now I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday style had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch on from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired out a whole cloth a conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Ladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything, and that there was retribution. Of pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them, and what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's I like looking at who and win. So the New York Times had their big story. There blockbuster story that they said on on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who's under investigation give bakers under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what they had against the president. Those are the who why aren't they under investigation? Yeah. Well, maybe they will be. We don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth two thousand seventeen with Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's a special counsel? Kobe gets fired their best pow Baker McCabe struck and their best pal. Jim Kolbe gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're gonna talk rottweilers if he comes in that same week rod Rosenstein, do what we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous. And it all happened in that critical eight days from people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme by the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme bias and two other people who were under investigation AB McCabe. Jim baker. By the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of them that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it and they committed a clear fraud conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that biased continued to try to infiltrate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the mower investigation. That's going on. Now. A you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more destination are tainted by that same bias is just problematic. Let's talk about Rx. Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth the open the investigation crossfire hurricane the opening investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we fake people. Remember the fires? It doesn't happen application doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce or our Justice department. High officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back same time. They. And it goes it goes back, even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce Moore, and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Mueller without got tangled prove that. Exactly, right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows..

FBI James Baker president President Trump Jim Baker chief counsel Sean general Bruce Baker McCabe rod Rosenstein Jim Jordan Christopher Steele Mark meadows Jim general counsel attorney DOJ Robert Muller Jim Kolbe
"baker mccabe" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

10:45 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on WTVN

"Rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We are previous deposition was cut off early. We we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's gonna be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting and interview with James Baker. We now know James Baker is under criminal investigation chief counsel to Jim Komeito FBI. Is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does their does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. Thanks so much. All right. So baker. Is the chief counsel commes top attorney the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is is deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of the investigation is the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter barking idea earlier this week to to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins. Cu we lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party. And so those are to be when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation and President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker. The DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker. And discover that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media and you're asking for request. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this five application was fraudulent and that they knew it was bought and paid for and they used it. Then anyway. Never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed an a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what what we're seeing. Now is is more and more information comes out. And Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we've found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was. Based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be that? If if now now, I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday, I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth a conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump. All of them. And what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election fixed the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's way, I like look at it who in win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbuster store that they said on on Friday you got to remember who in the win. Who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who is under investigation. Jim Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what they're biased animus they had against the president. Those are the who why aren't they under investigation? Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen. Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's a special counsel combing gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and page their best pal. Jim Jimmy gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're gonna talk and rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein do? Just what we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment and removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days scrub people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme bias. And two other people who were under investigation McCabe. Jim baker. By the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of 'em that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So. What did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that biased continued to try to imple- trait every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the more investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back, then and different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias is just problematic. Let's talk about Rx, Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth the open the investigation crossfire hurricane the opening investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the. Defies. It doesn't happen application doesn't happen until October October twenty first so, Bruce or is our Justice department. High officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back this same time. They all go. It goes back even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce or and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Muller. We've got numbers that proved that you're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows..

FBI president President Trump James Baker Jim Baker general Bruce Baker McCabe Jim Jordan chief counsel Rod Rosenstein Christopher Steele Mark meadows Sean Jim general counsel Fox News Robert Muller DOJ Jim Komeito fraud
"baker mccabe" Discussed on News Radio 920 AM

News Radio 920 AM

10:18 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on News Radio 920 AM

"And there's gonna be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know. Oh, James baker's under criminal investigation. Use the chief counsel to Jim commes FBI is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does their does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. All right. So Baker is the chief counsel commes top attorney. He's under criminal investigation. As is his deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're going to find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of an investigation. The by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he the subject of an investigation, we send a letter barking idea earlier this week to to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on. Here. We want to know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins. We lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party. And so those are two. When you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation. And also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins Cooley and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act. The committees learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce sore took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker and discovered that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media and you're asking for request. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it then anyway, never verifying corroborating knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what we're seeing now is is more and more information comes out. Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we've found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven parts of it were disproven. Problematic. So wouldn't that be if now now I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth a conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them, and what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So. And help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as a president, which is now gone for two years. Sean. Here's the way. I look at it who in win. So the New York Times had their big story. There blockbuster story that they said on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who under investigation. Jim Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what the name if they had to get the president those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen when Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name a special counsel Komi gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and page their best how Jim Komi gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're going to tie rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein do? This is what we also learned from Jim baker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice. Highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme bias and two other people were under investigation. Jim Baker, by the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? Getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally Yates, rod Rosenstein, the rest of them that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even in there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that biogas continued to try to implicate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the molar investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth open the investigation caused by hurricane the open investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember. Fis? It doesn't happen application doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce is our Justice department. High officials talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back the same time, they all boys, and it goes it goes back even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce or and Bruce sore seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Mueller without we've got. We've got the numbers that proved that you're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows..

FBI James Baker Jim Baker president President Trump general Bruce sore Jim Jordan chief counsel Sean Baker McCabe Christopher Steele Mark meadows Jim Jim Komi fraud Pfizer court attorney rod Rosenstein general counsel Justice department
"baker mccabe" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

News 96.5 WDBO

10:53 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

"You were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one and you're going to be with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you want to get from James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believes rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We our previous deposition was cut off early. We got we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know James is under criminal investigation chief counsel to Jim commes FBI is deputy FBI director. We now know. Similarly, Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does there does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program, John, thanks so much. All right. So baker. Is the chief counsel commes top attorney the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is his deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're going to find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead, Jim. But Jim Baker is the subject of the investigation is the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Mark. And I did earlier this week to the two Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins. We lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are two being when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins Kelly and took that information gave it to the investigators at the FBI. Also, the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker and discovered that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media and you're asking for request. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it. Then anyway. Never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed an a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what we're seeing now is is more and more information comes out. And Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is the. Pedic it to the investigation to the Pfizer application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be that? If if now now, I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday, I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they they literally conspired at a whole cloth a conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything, and that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI. What we really have here. If we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them, and what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our twenty sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high positions to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as a president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's the way. I look at it who in win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbuster story that they said on on Friday. You gotta remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about eighty McCabe who's under investigation. Jim Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what biased if they had to get those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. They well. Maybe they will be we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen. When Jim komo's fired it may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name a special counsel. Kobe gets fired their best pow Baker McCabe struck and page their best how Jim Komi gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're gonna talk rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein? Do. This is what we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice. Highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days from people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme bias and two other people were under investigation. Jim Baker, by the way, two of those people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of them that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to imple- trait every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the mower investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth you open the investigation crossfire, hurricane the open investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the fires at the FIS. It doesn't happen. Deprecating doesn't have to Tobruk Tober twenty first. So Bruce is Justice department. High officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back the same time. They go. It goes back even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce or and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Muller without got tangled numbers that proved that you're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows..

FBI James Baker Jim Baker president President Trump rod Rosenstein chief counsel general Bruce Sean Baker McCabe Jim Jordan Christopher Steele Mark meadows Jim general counsel Robert Muller Jim Komi DOJ Andrew McCabe fraud
"baker mccabe" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

KDWN 720AM

10:56 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on KDWN 720AM

"James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believed rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We have our previous deposition was cut off early. We we we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows. Of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting and interview with James Baker. We now know James Baker is under criminal investigation chief counsel to Jim commes FBI is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. Sean. Thanks so much. All right. So baker. Is the chief counsel commes top attorney the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is his deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is an investigation is the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Barkan idea earlier this week to to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins. Could we lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are two when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation and President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce sore took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker. And discover that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media, and you're asking for requests. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this five application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for. And they used it than any way never verifying corroborating knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what we're seeing now is is more and more information comes out. And Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI James Baker. Getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we've found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven parts of it were disproven. Problematic. So wouldn't that be that if now now I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday? I I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch on from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired out of whole cloth a conspiracy that the firing of James Komi was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place an insurance policy media league strategy. This is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them, and what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high positions to do so. And help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's why I like looking at who and win. So the New York Times had their big story. There blockbuster story that they said on on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who's under investigation. Jim Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what they had against the president. Those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this all happen? It happened in those critical eight days between may ninth 2017, which is fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name special counsel. Kobe gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and pay their best pal. Jim Komi gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're gonna to talk. Comes in that same week, rod Rosenstein, do this. What we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days from people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had extreme bias and two other people who were under investigation AB Jim Baker, by the way, two of those four people were fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of 'em that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof is that that bias continued to try to infiltrate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the mower destination that's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about Rx. Bruce met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth the open the investigation crossfire hurricane the opening investigation into President Trump at the July, July thirty first we fake people. Remember the? It doesn't happen doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce doors our Justice department. High officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back in time. They by. And it it goes back even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce Moore, and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Muller without. Proved that exactly right. Right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows..

FBI James Baker president Jim Baker President Trump Sean chief counsel Baker McCabe Bruce Moore rod Rosenstein Jim Jordan Mark meadows Christopher Steele Jim fraud Pfizer court Jim Komi general counsel Robert Muller Fox News
"baker mccabe" Discussed on KSFO-AM

KSFO-AM

11:22 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on KSFO-AM

"The FBI knowing. So you were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one in Uganda with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you want to get James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believed rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We our previous deposition was cut off early. We we we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's gonna be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting and interview with James Baker. We now know James Baker is under criminal investigation. He was the chief counsel to Jim commes FBI. Is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does there does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. Thank you. Thanks so much. All right. So Baker is the chief counsel commes top attorney, the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is his deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of an investigation in the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Barkan idea earlier this week to the to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information Perkins. We lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party. And so those are two being when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI and also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act. The committees learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker and discovered that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media, and you're asking for requests. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this FIS application was fraudulent and that they knew it was bought and paid for and they used it. Then anyway. Never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what we're seeing now is is more and more information comes out. And Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it mean even in those those interviews we've found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the FIS application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was. Based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be that? If if now now, I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday. So I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth a conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump. All of them. And what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election fixed the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high positions to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as a president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's the way. I look at it who in win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbuster story that they said on on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who is under investigation. Give Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what they're biased animus they had against the president. Those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth two thousand seventeen with Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's special counsel? Kobe gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and pay their best pal. Jim Kolbe gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're gonna talk and rod Rosenstein comes in that same week rod Rosenstein, do this is what we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight-day stroke people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme buys against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme bias. And two other people who were under investigation. Jim Baker, by the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of 'em that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to infiltrate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the more investigation. That's going on now. Yeah. You can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about Rx. Br Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth the open investigation cost my hurricane the opened investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we fake people. Remember the fight. It doesn't happen doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce is our Justice department. High officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back this same time. They only buy, and it goes it goes back even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce or and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Muller. We got numbers to prove that you're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows. Also, their take on the immigration government shutdown Hannity watch continues. If you are a believer in the second amendment like I am, and you're responsible gun owner. Like, I.

FBI James Baker president Jim Baker President Trump chief counsel general Bruce rod Rosenstein Baker McCabe Jim Jordan Christopher Steele Sean Mark meadows Jim general counsel Robert Muller attorney DOJ Hannity Jim Kolbe
"baker mccabe" Discussed on WTVN

WTVN

10:57 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on WTVN

"So when he says that he believed rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We are previous deposition was cut off early. We we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know James baker's under criminal investigation. He the chief counsel to Jim commes FBI. Is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more. Jim Jordan of Ohio when congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. All right. So Baker is the chief counsel commes top attorney, the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is is deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of the investigation is the the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of this idea earlier this week to to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins coup. Lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party marks. And so those are two giving when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act. The committees learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general bruiser took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker. And discover that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media and you're asking for request. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it. Then anyway. Never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed an a conscious act of fraud against the FIS court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what what we're seeing. Now is is more and more information comes out. And and Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we've found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is. Predicates to the investigation to the Pfizer application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be that if now now I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday, I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth a conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything, and that there was retribution of pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI. What we really have here. If we're going to get to the bottom line here, what we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them. And what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as president which is now gone on for two years. So here's why I like to look at it who in win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbusters toward that they said on on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who's under investigation. Jim Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what they're biased animus they had against the president. Those are the who why aren't they under investigation? Yeah. They well. Maybe they will be we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen when Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name special counsel Komi gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and pay their best pow Jim Komi gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're going to rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein do? This is what we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening. At the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days scrub people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme buys against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had extreme bias and two other people who were under investigation Apia, McCabe and Baker. By the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of them that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to infiltrate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the molar investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth. He opened the investigation. Crossfire hurricane the opening investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the fires at the FIS. It doesn't happen application doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce is our Justice department. High officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back this same time. They only and it goes it goes back even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce or and Bruce seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying. Leaking to Robert Muller. We've got numbers that prove that. You're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows. Also, their take on the immigration government shutdown Hannity watch continues. If you are a believer in the second amendment like I am, and you're responsible gun owner. Like, I.

FBI President Trump president James Baker Jim Baker Baker McCabe Jim Jordan chief counsel rod Rosenstein Christopher Steele Bruce congressman Mark meadows Jim Jim Komi Sean DOJ Robert Muller Fox News Hannity Jim commes
"baker mccabe" Discussed on KNST AM 790

KNST AM 790

11:13 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on KNST AM 790

"You were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one in Uganda with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you want to get from James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believes rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We are previous deposition was cut off early. We got we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know James Baker is under criminal investigation was the chief counsel to Jim commes FBI. Is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does their does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. All right. So baker. Is the chief counsel commes top attorney FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is is deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. But Jim Baker is the subject of the investigation is the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter bark, and I did earlier this week to to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins coup. Lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are two being when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who was the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI and also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigate. Active in prosecutorial, practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce sore took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker. And discover that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media, and you're asking for requests. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this FIS application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it then anyway, never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what what we're seeing. Now is is more and more information comes out. And Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. I James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know, that bias is creeping in and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the FIS application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be that if now now I don't know how you felt about the? The hearings yesterday I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth that conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place an insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here what we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them. And what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our twenty sixteen election fixed the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage. And then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's the way I like to look at it who in win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbuster story that they said on on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy MacKay who was under investigation give bakers under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what the animus they had against the president. Those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. Well, maybe they will be and we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen when Jim companies fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name a special counsel. Kobe gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and page their best pal. Jim Kolbe gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're going to tie rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein do? This is what we also learned from Jim baker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice. Highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days from people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme bias and two other people who were under investigation AB McCabe, and Jim Baker, by the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of 'em that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to infiltrate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the investigation that's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back, then and different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias is just problematic. Let's talk about Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth the open the investigation crossfire, hurricane the open investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the FIS it defies. It doesn't happen. Deprecation doesn't have to lots over October twenty first so Bruce stories on Justice department. High officials already talked with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear. Back the same time. They only. And it goes it goes back, even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce or and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele. Who was fired for lying? A leaking to Robert Muller without we've got that proved that you're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows. Also, their take on the immigration government shutdown Hannity watch continues. If you are a believer in the second amendment like I am, and you're responsible gun owner. Like, I.

FBI James Baker president Jim Baker President Trump general Bruce sore Baker McCabe chief counsel rod Rosenstein Jim Jim Jordan Sean Christopher Steele Mark meadows general counsel Robert Muller DOJ Hannity Jim Kolbe fraud
"baker mccabe" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

News 96.5 WDBO

10:46 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on News 96.5 WDBO

"You were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one and you're going with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you want to get from James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believed rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the weight that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI council. So we're going to ask you more about that. Our previous deposition was cut off early. We got we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're gonna ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus, and those were the comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know James Baker is under criminal investigation. Use the chief counsel to Jim commes FBI is deputy FBI director. We now know. Similarly, Andrew McCabe is under criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's gonna be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order, swimming that the new attorney general does their job does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more. Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program, John, thanks so much. All right. So Baker is the chief counsel commes top attorney. He's under criminal investigation. As is is deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're going to find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead, Jim. But Jim Baker is the subject of the investigation in the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Mark. And I did this week to to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from Perkins coup. Lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents a democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are two when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who was the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer Perkins Kelly and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation. President Trump I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker and discovered that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media and you're asking for request. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this FIS application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it then anyway, never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed a conscious act of fraud against the court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what we're seeing now is more and more information comes out in. Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI James Baker getting it from. From a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it. I mean, even in those those interviews we found that James Baker. Bruce, or they did things only India investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to defies the application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven. Problematic. So wouldn't that be if if now now I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth conspiracy that the firing of James Komi was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything, and that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them, and what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our twenty sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive. Five legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as a president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's why I look at it who and win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbuster story that they said on on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about eighty McCabe who is under investigation give bickers under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what they had to get the private those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. They well. Maybe they will be we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth 2017 Jim companies fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's named special counsel. Kobe gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and pay their best. How Jim Kobe gets fired? And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're to tie rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein do? This is what we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels of. The FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous. And it all happened in that critical eight days people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme buys against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme bias and two other people who were under investigation. Jim Baker, by the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of 'em that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false and the Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to infiltrate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the molar investigation. That's going on now. Yeah. You can you can look at some of the things that were happening back, then and different. Individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same by it's just problematic. Let's talk about Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth open the investigation crossfire, hurricane the open investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the fires the FIS. It doesn't happen doesn't happen until October October twenty first so, Bruce or Justice department high officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back the same time. They only buy, and it goes it goes back, even if it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce hor and Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to rob. Muller without we've got numbers that proved that you're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows. Also, their take on the immigration government shutdown Hannity watch continues. If you are a believer in the second amendment like I am, and you're responsible gun owner. Like, I am don't.

FBI James Baker president Jim Baker Donald Trump general Bruce rod Rosenstein chief counsel Baker McCabe Jim Jordan Mark meadows Christopher Steele Sean Jim Fox News general counsel Robert Muller Hannity fraud Andrew McCabe
"baker mccabe" Discussed on KTOK

KTOK

11:44 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on KTOK

"Oh, Jane FBI were. Based on that without sharing. We issues. Based on testimony. Some of the FIS afoot. Democrat. Consistently testimony. Which? Perhaps the FBI knowing about. Potential bias. So you you were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one in Uganda with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you want to get from James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believed rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. Our previous deposition was cut off early. We go we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're going to ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's gonna be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know James Baker is under criminal investigation chief counsel to Jim commes FBI. Is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's going to be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does there does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. Thanks so much. All right. So baker. Is the chief counsel commes top attorney the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is is deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of the investigation is the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Mark. And I did earlier this week to to Mr. Durham US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins. Cu we lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are to be when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ and FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Bruce took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker. And discover that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media, and you're asking for requests. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this FIS application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it. Then anyway. Never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed an a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what we're seeing now is is more and more information comes out. And Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was. A based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be if if now now I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth a conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here what we have people that hated Donald Trump. All of them. And what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high positions to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then hurt him as a president, which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's the way. I look at it who in win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbuster story that they said on on Friday, you gotta remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who is under investigation did is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what the animus they had against the president. Those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen when Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name a special counsel Komi gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and pay their best. How Jim Komi gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're gonna talk Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein, do what we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels of the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days Trump people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had extreme bias. And two other people who were under investigation envy, McCabe and Jim Baker. By the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of them that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So. What did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end their, Sean. It went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to infiltrate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the more investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back, then and different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth the open the investigation crossfire hurricane the opening investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the fires. It doesn't happen application doesn't happen until October October twenty so Bruce doors is our Justice department. High officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back. At the same time. They only go. It goes back even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele was desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce or Bruce or seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Muller. We've got the numbers that prove that. You're exactly right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows. Also, their take on the immigration government shutdown Hannity watch continues. If you are a believer in the second amendment like I am, and you're responsible gun owner. Like, I.

FBI James Baker president President Trump chief counsel Jim Baker Baker McCabe general Bruce Jim Jordan rod Rosenstein Jane FBI Sean Mark meadows Christopher Steele Jim Jim Komi general counsel Robert Muller Fox News DOJ
"baker mccabe" Discussed on 710 WOR

710 WOR

11:13 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on 710 WOR

"You were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one in Uganda with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you wanna get from James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believed rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We are previous deposition was cut off early. We go we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're gonna ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who are in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were their comments after they had a behind closed door meeting and interview with James Baker. We now know James Baker is under criminal investigation. He was the chief counsel to Jim commes FBI. Is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under a criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's gonna be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does there does his job and joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. John. Thanks so much. All right. So baker. Is the chief counsel commes top attorney the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is his deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're gonna find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what did we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of an investigation in the by the US attorney in Connecticut that was news to us. There have been rumors of that. But he is the subject of an investigation. We sent a letter Mark. And I did earlier this week to the to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on here. We wanna know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from Perkins. Cu we lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party marks. And so those are two being when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer at Perkins Cooley and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act. The committees learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DOJ associate deputy attorney general Brewster took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker. And discover that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media and you're asking for request. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this FIS application was fraudulent and that they knew it was bought and paid for and they used it then anyway, never verifying corroborating and knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what we're seeing now is is more and more information comes out. And Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. Jay. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we've found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know, that bias is creeping in and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the FIS application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven problematic. So wouldn't that be that? If if now now, I don't know how you felt about the here. Earnings yesterday. I had some mixed emotions I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth a conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here what we have people that hated Donald Trump. All of them. And what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So and help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as a president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's a look at it who in win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbuster story that they said on on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who is under investigation. Jim Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what by the animus they had against the president. Those are the who why aren't they under investigation? Yeah. They well. Maybe they will be we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen when Jim Comey's fired. It may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name special counsel gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and pay their best pal. Jim Komi gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're going to tie rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein do? This is what we also learned from Jim baker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice. Highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days from people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme buys against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme bias and two other people were under investigation API Jim Bakker Baker, by the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? Getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of them that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof of is that that bias continued to try to imple- trait every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the mower investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias. It's just problematic. Let's talk about Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth you open the investigation crossfire hurricane the opening investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the FIS. It doesn't happen. Deprecating doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce stories on Justice department. High officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back the same time, they all boys, and it goes it goes back even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through Bruce bruiser and Bruce sore seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying. Leaking to Robert Mueller without we've got numbers that proved that here. Exactly, right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows. Also, their take on the immigration government shutdown Hannity watch continues. If you are a believer in the second amendment like I am, and you're responsible gun owner. Like, I.

FBI James Baker president Jim Baker President Trump chief counsel rod Rosenstein Baker McCabe Bruce bruiser Jim Jordan Christopher Steele Mark meadows Sean Jim general counsel Jim Komi Jim Bakker Baker Fox News Justice department Hannity
"baker mccabe" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

Newsradio 1200 WOAI

11:14 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

"You were in the deposition with with James Baker the first one in Uganda with him this upcoming Thursday. What do you want to get from James Baker this week? Well, first of all remember who this is this is this is the FBI chief counsel all kinds of things flow through him. So when he says that he believes rod Rosenstein was serious about this this this alleged statement about recording the president, you gotta take that with the way that it comes with because it's the it's the FBI chief counsel. So we're going to ask you more about that. We our previous deposition was cut off early. We we ran out of time. So we need him back in there where we're gonna ask more about that specific meeting that took place, and then his conversations with people who were in that meeting. How those went and who all he talked to. So all those things need to be asked. And there's going to be more big breaking news tonight. We'll be breaking at nine eastern on Hannity on the Fox News channel. Now that was Jim Jordan and Mark meadows of the freedom caucus and those were there. Comments after they had a behind closed door meeting an interview with James Baker. We now know James baker's under criminal investigation is the chief counsel to Jim commes FBI is deputy FBI director. We now know similarly Andrew McCabe is under criminal investigation. And I think with the news that is going to break tonight on the Fox News channel, I think there's gonna be a lot of other people that are going to be under a criminal investigation in pretty short order Suming that the new attorney general does their jaw does his job. And joining us now to discuss this and much more Jim Jordan of Ohio and congressman Mark meadows of North Carolina. Welcome both of you to the program. Sean. Thank you. Thanks so much. All right. So Baker is the chief counsel commes top attorney, the FBI he's under criminal investigation. As is is deputy FBI director. And I think after tonight we're going to find that a lot of these people are really in a lot of trouble. But let's go specifically to what are we learn in the Baker interview that you had behind closed doors? Baker. Go ahead. No, go ahead. Jim. Jim Baker is the subject of an investigation at the eight by the US attorney in Connecticut. That was news to us. There have been rumors that, but he is the subject of an investigation, we send a letter Mark. And I did earlier this week to the to Mr. Durham, the US attorney in Connecticut to find out what's going on. Here. We want to know we think this is important information. So that's that's one of the big takeaways, and of course, the other one was that Jim Baker was getting information from a Perkins. We lawyer big democrat lawyer who represents the democrat party Mark Sussman and so those are two be when you got the chief counsel to the FBI who is the subject of an investigation and also who got information from the Democrats lawyer Perkins coup and took that information and gave it to the investigators at the FBI. And also the guy who's now pushing for this investigation to President Trump. I think that says a lot you said in your joint letter together that we know the DOJ FBI departed from traditional investigative and prosecutorial practices and insufficiently adhered to the foreign intelligence service act Faiza the committee's learned that in some instances high ranking DOJ FBI officials, including the FBI general counsel James Baker, the DO J, associate deputy attorney general Bruce took the self-described unusual step of inserting themselves into the. Evidentiary chain of custody. And during the course of our investigation, we interviewed the former FBI general counsel Baker. And discover that your office is investigating him for unauthorized disclosures to the media and you're asking for request. Now, I'm beginning to get wind of the possibility that there is full on evidence that everybody knew what became the bulk of this five application was fraudulent and that they knew what was bought and paid for and they used it then anyway, never verifying corroborating knowing its origins that would mean anybody who signed off on a committed an a conscious act of fraud against the Pfizer court. Wouldn't that be the case, Mark meadows? Well, it is a case, Sean, I think what we're seeing now is is more more information comes out. And and Jim was exactly right. It's it's not only that you had the general counsel for the FBI. James Baker getting information from a law firm that was representing the Democrat National Committee. But it was the way that they did it even in those those interviews we found that James Baker, Bruce or they did things only in the investigation of this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know that bias is creeping in. And and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the FIS the application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven. Problematic. So wouldn't that be if now now I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch hunt from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they they literally conspired at a whole cloth. The conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media leaks strategy, this is after we now know that the FBI what we really have here if we're going to get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them, and what we had is they worked together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So. And help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's a look at it who would win. So the New York Times had their big story there blockbusters story that they said on on Friday, you got to remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who is under investigation. Jim Baker is under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what they had against the president. Those are the who why aren't they under investigation? Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then when did this happen it happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen. Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's name a special counsel. Kobe gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and pay their best pal. Jim Kobe gets fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're going to talk rod Rosenstein comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein do this? What we also learned from Jim Bakker's deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office. This is happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days Trump people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text messages, that's who these people had as extreme by. And two other people were under investigation API became Jim Baker, by the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier? And what did they know about the dossier? Because I'm getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was false from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of them that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the court. What would that mean for them? Well, I I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one case. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherit there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further what we believe. And what we have proof is that that bias continued to try to infiltrate every aspect of this investigation, including and not limited to the molar investigation. That's going on. Now, you can you can look at some of the things that were happening back then. And different individuals certainly associated with the more investigation are tainted by that same bias is just problematic. Let's talk about. Bruce or met with Christopher Steele in July thirtieth opened the investigation. Crossfire hurricane the opening investigation into President Trump at the end of July, July, thirty first we think people remember the defies. It doesn't happen application doesn't happen until October October twenty first so Bruce Justice department, high officials already talking with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier clear back this same time. They only buy, and it goes it goes back even it goes later than that too. Because remember the communications between Christopher Steele, and Bruce or where Christopher Steele is desperately trying to funnel information to Robert Muller through bruiser and Bruce sore seemingly based on the the exchanges. We've seen wants to give Muller the information that Christopher Steele who was fired for lying and leaking to Robert Mueller without. We've got numbers that prove that. Exactly. Right. All right. Stay right there. Well, more with Jim Jordan, Mark meadows. Also, their take on the immigration government shutdown Hannity watch continues. If you are a believer in the second amendment like I am, and you're responsible gun owner. Like, I am don't.

FBI James Baker President Trump president Jim Baker Sean chief counsel general Bruce rod Rosenstein Baker McCabe Jim Jordan Mark meadows Christopher Steele Jim general counsel Fox News Hannity DOJ Robert Muller fraud
"baker mccabe" Discussed on WINT 1330 AM

WINT 1330 AM

04:47 min | 2 years ago

"baker mccabe" Discussed on WINT 1330 AM

"That James Baker. Bruce, or they did things only India vestige this president that have never been done before. And so when you start to treat this president differently than all other other Americans, you know, that bias is creeping in and what we're finding is the predicate to the investigation to the FIS a application was not only fraudulently done, but it was fraudulently renewed over and over and over again when they knew that it was a based on a dossier. That was not only unproven but parts of it were disproven. Problematic. So wouldn't that be if now now I don't know how you felt about the hearings yesterday I had some mixed emotions. I do believe this was a witch on from the beginning. I think there's a lot of evidence to show that now we now know that they literally conspired at a whole cloth. The conspiracy that the firing of James Comey was collusion with the president and Vladimir Putin without a shred of evidence of any anything. And that there was retribution pieces put in place and insurance policy media league strategy. This is after we now know that the F B I what we really have here if we're gonna get to the bottom line here, we have people that hated Donald Trump all of them, and what we had is they work together to rig the outcome of our two thousand sixteen election, fix the outcome of the two thousand sixteen election using their high position to do. So. And help Hillary Clinton get elected helper survive legally when she clearly obstructed Justice violated the espionage act and then used her bought and paid for Russian lies to hurt. Donald Trump is a candidate. And then heard him as a president which is now gone on for two years. Sean. Here's a look at it who would win for the New York Times had their big story. There blockbuster story that they said on on Friday. You gotta remember the who in the win who is the people we've been talking about Andy McCabe who is under investigation give bakers under investigation and Lisa page and Peter Struck who we know what they had to get the president. Those are the who why are they under investigation. Yeah. Well, maybe they will be we don't we don't know. But those are the who. And then win did this happen. It happened in those critical eight days between may ninth twenty seventeen when Jim Comey's fired in may seventeen twenty seventeen when Robert Muller's named special counsel. Kobe gets fired their best pal Baker McCabe struck and page their best pow Jim Komi, get fired. And now they're saying, oh, wait a minute. We're gonna launch an investigation into the president. We're we're gonna talk if he comes in that same week. What is rod Rosenstein, do what we also learned from Jim biggers deposition rod Rosenstein threatens to wear a wire to record. The president is talking about invoking the twenty fifth amendment removing the president from office happening at the highest levels of art department of Justice highest levels at the FBI. And this is what is so scary. And so dangerous, and it all happened in that critical eight days scrub people who way back the year before when they started this investigation had this extreme bias against the president. And we know that because we've seen the page and struck text message. That's who these people had extreme bias and two other people who were under investigation. Jim baker. By the way, two of those four people were also fired by the FBI that is how bad it was. When did they know about the dossier, and what did they know about the dossier because? Getting some information that may prove that everybody knew the dossier was falls from the get-go. But that means that they consciously presented a fraud before the Pfizer court. What would that mean for everybody, including Komi, Sally, Yates, rod Rosenstein, and the rest of them that signed off on it. If they knew that it was false, and that Clinton paid for it, and they committed a clear fraud a conscious fraud on the Pfizer court. What would that mean for them? Well, I think that certainly you have the potential for criminal offenses at at one Kate. But here's what you also have, Sean. And I think that this is what is so troubling is the bias that went from opening up the investigation to treating Donald Trump differently. The bias that was inherent there that even went further that once they said, well, we need to cut down this this communication the way that we do that. Because Christopher Steele is no longer a legitimate source. So what did they do? They went around it to the DOJ got Bruce or to actually perpetuate it. But then it didn't even end there. Sean, it went further.

president Donald Trump Sean Jim Komi rod Rosenstein Hillary Clinton James Baker FBI James Comey Bruce Jim baker fraud Pfizer court Jim Comey Vladimir Putin New York Times Baker McCabe India Peter Struck