22 Burst results for "Astrazeneca Moderna"

Anthony Fauci Shares His Final Message From the White House

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:42 min | Last week

Anthony Fauci Shares His Final Message From the White House

"To be thankful for this week. Including Anthony Fauci, no longer being in our government. Now I haven't seen the last of Anthony Fauci. I got to tell you. We got to get him back in front of Congress. We got to get this leadership fight figured out. We got to get committees filled, and then we got to start sending subpoenas out like frisbees. To every single one of these people. Fauci gave his final message today at The White House play cut 69. So my message and my final message may be the final message I give you from this podium is that please, for your own safety for that of your family, get your updated COVID-19 shot as soon as you're eligible to protect yourself, your family and your community. This guy never stops. Paid to you by Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna and Johnson & Johnson. Fauci continues. He says the real danger is those of us that have not been vaccinated. Play cut 72. In vaccinated and unboosted versus vaccinated plus boosted. That doesn't mean you shouldn't get boosted, but the real danger is in the people who have not been vaccinated. So that's where we expect if we're going to see a problem this winter, it's going to, yeah, if you see a problem, it's going to be the unvaccinated people. Doctor Anthony Fauci is the worst of the fourth branch of government. There has to be a mandate for this new Republican House of Representatives. To put on full display the lying the cheating, the stealing the deceit. The self enrichment. Of Anthony Fauci.

Anthony Fauci Fauci Astrazeneca Moderna Congress White House Johnson & Johnson Pfizer Republican House Of Representa
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

04:40 min | Last month

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Hi Charlie. I just want to open up by saying I am a leftist and I understand your perspective on thanks for being here. But I did want to hear you out today and well, you know, ask a question. So you said that you believe that quarantine is the cause of our generations like distraught essentially. And I believe that is actually war. We were born fresh out of 9 11, some of us around the time of 9 11, and I don't know. My father served in Afghanistan. So I don't have a very keen perspective of the United States, let's say, but I didn't want to hear you out on what you had to say. And I do believe we have some common ground in the fact that capitalism has failed my generation more than any other in recent years. Yeah, I didn't quite say that, but I would say lack of free enterprise in some ways, but that's okay. You got most of it. So the lockdowns, not quarantine, right? That was the word I used. But I'll just I'll prove it to you. So the worst thing aside, I mean, how many people in this room know someone that committed suicide or seriously harm themselves in the midst of the pandemic, just by a show of hands? That's a lot. I mean, the numbers show suicide visits were 50% higher among 12 to 17 year olds during the same period in 2018. Psychiatric medication, prescription went up, alcoholism went up, drug use went up, not to mention young people, then reentered an economy where everything was twice as expensive because we created a bunch of money because of the lack of productivity in the lockdowns. And so I think it's just an arguable that the lockdowns played a huge role. A massive role in really depriving a generation of the ability to congregate and to communicate. Can I say my perspective? Yeah, sure. This is kind of personal, but I was considering taking my own life before quarantine. And I think discovering myself during quarantine is what saved myself. I have quite the opposite experience. I know that it's unique in that case. But I would say that it's the opposite. I would say it's the opposite case. But that's just my personal perspective. I think there are far more worse things than my generation has been exposed to, then the lockdown. And the inflation that you have cited during the lockdown, that's arguably not the fault of the current standing president if you do believe that it is current standing president. Well, right. I mean, first of all, Biden created 5 trillion new dollars not created. But he approved 5 trillion new dollars that was hyperinflationary. But I'll even give you the other COVID relief funds never should have been approved. But look, it's not just the suicide issue but first of all, thank you. We're glad you're here. We're glad you didn't make that decision. Life is beautiful and worthy of protection. I mean that. And but it's from childhood speech impediment development. It's from a social cues. It's from if you talk to any psychologist or child psychologist, they do not have the bandwidth to be able to even facilitate the amount of kids. And I know that you have an obviously exception experience, but that is the exception, right? I mean, it is self evident that these lockdowns were unusually cruel. And you know who they were most cruel to poor families. There was the most cruel to people that didn't have extra bedrooms or high speed Internet connection to be able to keep up with this. The kind of zombification of American education was the hardest on the people that the regime said they want to help the most. And I mean, so you're an economic leftist, is that fair to say? Yeah. I mean, would you at least agree that for one of your passionate causes, which is billionaires getting wealthier, billionaires got $600 billion wealthier. Absolutely. And your whole big tech stocks is what it says. I don't know what it says. But that's one of them. Absolutely on your side with that. And I don't think enough conservatives understand that the left are equally against big business as they are. Well, some leftists, right? I mean, it depends who you talk to. The loud minority, I would say, are the ones that are make you get the impression that we're not against big businesses. Yeah, I promise the ones that actually read or excuse me where I'm a little cynical about that just to be honest where I have to hear there against big business while they mandated a Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna vaccine of publicly traded transnational corporations. And see, that's more of like, in my eyes, neoliberal concept. Okay, but I mean, it was find me one left wing senator that opposed that and it just didn't exist. But I think you're coming at this from an honest perspective. And I'll just close with this. This is what drives me nuts about kind of the fixation on race all the time and all these other issues that I would prefer not to talk about is that I think there's actually agreement on kind of how things went wrong last couple of years. You blame capitalism. I blame more cronyism. Big government intervention over a lot of different things. But I'm afraid that a lot of what we spend our time talking about are some of the more superficial issues rated in rooted in race Marxism..

COVID Charlie Afghanistan United States Biden AstraZeneca Moderna Pfizer
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

05:02 min | 5 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Is what they would say. CNN dot com, the worst variant is here. Now, this is important. We now need to get to a screaming pitch to every Republican and say, wake up, it's happening all over again. They're going to try to do fear induced paranoia. They're going to do mail in ballots and drop boxes. They are not stopping. They are accelerating. They're not going to apologize. They're not going to repent. They're only going to ridicule us. Anti science, all these different things. We have to hold the line. You're never locking us down again, period, end of story. You're not putting masks on kids, you're not going to mandate vaccines. And by the way, as a side note. So Anthony Fauci says the vaccine doesn't work that well against infection. Then why the heck are we discharging members of the United States military for not taking a vaccine? Fauci himself is the one that put forward those guidelines. Yeah, it doesn't work that well against infection. Oh, I'm glad that we're now making our military smaller and weaker for discharging people that don't want to take the vaccine for that. I'm glad we can't now have flights that fly on time because pilots are now being discharged because they don't want to take vaccine. This is part of the plan. And I think they got other stuff that they're going to do. They're not going to give up power. All they care about is power. We must expose this early and counter message. As they tried to get us to comply to whatever sort of be a .5, as Susie said, she emailed us freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. She said it should be titled BS .5. I like it. Or just the midterm variant. Call it what it is. Anthony Fauci says we really should be wearing masks in indoor settings, play cut 73. Well, now we're seeing a fair amount of orange, which means you really should, in an indoor setting, a congregate setting, be wearing masks. It's just the appropriate thing to do. And then on television, this is their narrative, get ready for it. We have to counter message it, do not fall for the fear induced paranoia, cut 76 doctor Peter holtz saying quote, these numbers are going up precipitously. It's the highest transmission one we've seen the date, play cut 76. It's the most highly transmissible one we've seen to date. So with each successive wave of sub variants, we're getting more and more transmissible sub variants and now we're up around something that's close to measles, which is the most common transmissible infectious agent we know about. This guy's been wrong about everything for two years. Everything been wrong about Ivermectin azithromycin been wrong by intravenous therapy wrong about the vaccine, wrong about masks, wrong about children in schools, wrong about boosters, and he just keeps on going up on television. And he's. This guy's the image of health. He's this overweight pudgy doctor that looks like a ghost that hasn't left his office in the last two like you're the person I should look to for health advice. It's like man boob Bill Gates. Like you actually, I'm not gonna listen to you. You got arms like toothpicks, you got a big gut and I don't think you could run a mile without capsizing over. I'm actually not gonna take health advice from you. No, but I'm an expert because I have 9 different booster shots. No, actually, you're a client of Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna and Johnson & Johnson. That's all. Your spokesperson, your propagandist, we know that whatever you say, it comes at a price. That's who you are. So we are spending more than any other country per CAPiTA on health expenditures and our life expectancy is flatlining in fact going down. What's going on here? Well, there's a lot of different things going on. But that's a longer conversation. That's a different conversation for a different time. And from diet to pharmaceuticals, destroying our country, these pharmaceutical companies who have done such damage. And I know, and I don't want to just preface this. Yes, some people, of course, need diabetes medication or cancer and lifesaving drugs. I get all of that. But I believe there is a massive over medication problem here. And it ties into what we're talking about when it comes into this midterm variant. The midterm variant that we are seeing right now is trying to set the preconditions to say, hey, hey, there's BA .5, we now need mass mail in ballots, be 8.5, we need to be able to get a Democrat in office a lot quicker because of it. This is, this is one of their major and core plans. We can not fall for it. In fact, we must aggressively and assertively countermessage it. Immediately. Doctor Malone says the people who are dying and ending up hospitalized with the omicron B 8.5 are highly jabbed. Negative efficacy. BA .5 don't fall for it. We're going to now do an aggressive counter messaging. With McCullough with Malone with all of these different people peer Corey to show you the facts of what's really happening here. We can not allow them to establish a narrative early. We must kill it early..

Anthony Fauci paranoia Charlie Kirk Peter holtz Fauci CNN Susie AstraZeneca Moderna United States Bill Gates Johnson & Johnson Pfizer diabetes cancer Malone McCullough Corey
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:44 min | 5 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"At some point, facts have to matter. Elaborate on that point. You're talking about facts matter. We have to follow the truth no matter where it leads us. Daniel Horowitz elaborate on that. Sure, I'm speaking to Republicans. Democrats obviously they're part of the genocide. The problem with Republicans is this. Facts, they're impervious to facts as much as the Democrats are. Because they set up this image that they want to evince to the public. This is the nice Goldilocks thing. I oppose mandates, but I love anything called a vaccine. And that's where they are right now. And obviously as you all know, when you're doing that, you're not effectively opposing the mandate. It's either hence we still have the military mandates in the worst things. Kidney transplants being denied and they're not doing anything about it. But the problem with that, as I said, I said, you'll be made to care. At some point, you can allow anti vax to become the new racism. At some point, it has to matter. Thomas solely used to say this on a legal immigration. People would be like, I'm pro immigrant, and he's like, I'm pro shoes. He wrote a column like 6, 7 years ago, the abstract immigrant. You know, well, the details matter. I mean, okay, like, I love vaccines. Okay, but this one has over a million adverse events reported to VAERS over 30,000 deaths over 200,000 hospitalizations and over 14,000 categories of maladies, and we know it's woefully under reported because it's so impossible to fill it out. So it's like, Jude, we kind of got a problem here. And then they say, now we're going to introduce it on babies and I thought, okay, they're going to rebel. And there was no one home. It was one governor, the Florida governor opposed it every other one and promotes it. And in the Senate was wrong John and maybe Rand Paul and that was

AstraZeneca Moderna Rand Paul Jude Daniel Thomas Johnson & Johnson Senate Pfizer Florida New York John polio Charlie Wuhan
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

03:03 min | 5 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"But what I really want to focus on is the idea here of the over prescription of antidepressants and these other interventions. And to help us unpack that, someone who I really enjoy having on, the author of the bodies of others, the new authoritarians COVID-19, and the war against the human, the author of which is doctor Naomi wolf, doctor welcome back to the program. Thank you so much, Charlie. It's really great to talk to you. Please call me Naomi. Naomi, thank you for joining us again. So give us your thoughts here, nihilism, mixed with these incredibly, let's say, powerful pharmacological compounds such as SSRIs and benzodiazepines, zoloft and Xanax, and how we are over prescribing them to our nation's youth, the latest study shows that 12 to 13% of our nation's young people are on some form of psychiatric drugs. What is the potential downside of that? What are your thoughts? Yeah, well, just, you know, I have to always start conversations like this by warning that I'm not a medical doctor. That said, I've written three. Non fiction books about health issues about the pharmaceutical industry. And I'm a mom and a step mom. And I really agree with you about your concerns. First, what I would say is we've imposed on children and teenagers in young adults in the last two years. Circumstances that the bodies of others points out are guaranteed to cause mental illness to cause anxiety to cause depression. And to cause other kinds of stress is that young adults have never been subjected to really in the history of human beings. Outside of places like North Korea or the Warsaw ghetto. And what I mean is this, just in the last two years, we isolated young adults. We isolated teenagers. We kept them at home, you know, chained to computers. We didn't let them go to school. We sent them home from university. Even now and the bodies of others starts with, and I've written about this a lot, you know, starting with my book in 2008, the end of America, which looked at the effect of isolation on political prisoners. You're not allowed to keep political prisoners isolated. You're not allowed to keep prisoners isolated or in solitary confinement for long, even one day of isolation causes permanent changes in the brain. And can cause mental illness and psychosis. So we, to my astonishment, at places like Ivy League universities, major state universities, kids who test young adults who test positive for COVID and these PCR tests are full of problems as I point out as well. They're isolated for up to a week alone in their rooms with not allowed to be outside with other young

ADHD autism Andrew huberman lempke depression AstraZeneca Moderna United States Republican Party Johnson & Johnson Pfizer Charlie Kirk Charlie Malcolm Depression
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

09:17 min | 5 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Well, maybe this is one of the reasons why. Psychology today dot com. Before I say this, what percentage of children do you think are on psychiatric drugs? What percentage of children? According to psychology today, one in 12 children are on psychiatric drugs. One in 12 children. 12.9% of 12 to 17 year olds. The use of psychiatric drugs in children has been steadily increasing for many years in several countries. In the United States, 8.5% of children under the age of 18 are on medication for ADD ADHD autism, ASD or difficulties with emotion, concentration or behavior, according to a national survey. Psychiatric drug use and youth is increasing in many countries. But we don't even know what impact this has on the developing brain and to psychology today to their credit they wrote this quote, these trends are of concern because very little is known about the effects of these drugs taken alone or in combination on the developing brain, not to mention with alcohol, high stress, low sleep, bright screens all the time in front of their eyes. Marijuana, what happens when you mix benzodiazepines or prozac or zoloft with marijuana? That's probably not a good combination for developing brain. For example, a review of 26 studies on antidepressants in children concluded that quote finding suggest that most newer antidepressants may reduce depression symptoms in a small and unimportant way compared with placebo. Suicide related thinking and behavior may be increased in those taking these medications. What if actually all these antidepressants that are plaguing our land are having an adverse effect? How much of this could actually be solved through healthy living and understanding a developing brain and having just a just a little bit an elementary and introductory understanding of how dopamine works. Just like a little bit. How does serotonin work? How does dopamine work? How does adrenaline work? And I'm far from an expert. In fact, I wouldn't even call myself fluent or literate in this category. But just reading a little bit of the literature and exposing yourself to some of what the experts have to say about this. People like Andrew huberman and lempke that have done a lot of research on this. All of a sudden, it's not hard to start to piece together all of the empirical evidence where you start to see a generation that is so burned out. So for example, just a very simple thing when you look at dopamine for every increase of dopamine from the baseline, you have to have an inverse decrease. Meaning if you go two and a half times above baseline, you're going to have to go below baseline two and a half times. Now, many of you know this probably when you say, man, after something that I really enjoyed a sports game and event or night with friends, sometimes a couple days later, I'm feeling a little bit down. Why is that? It's because dopamine is the reward or incentive chemical in your brain. It literally keeps you going. It is what feels good when you accomplish something. So chocolate, for example, is an immediate boost of dopamine levels. Cocaine, amphetamines, sex, and there's other things as well, such as connection with people around you. Now there can be good and healthy boosts in dopamine, and then there's unhealthy interventions. But let's just take video games, for example. I'm not here to bash video games a judgment free zone. I played video games growing up. I know a lot of people do as well. But if you look at the reward structure behind video games, they know exactly what they're doing. They make them competitive, they make them intentionally try to keep on escalating your engagement, your screen time, where you are literally having your child burn out their brain and their dopamine reward structure by the time they get in the real world, they said, there's no beauty, there's no truth note goodness. What they need is really a 60 day dopamine fast. Now another thing that destroys young people's brains that no one wants to talk about again, judgment free zone. I'm not here to moralize is pornography. What porn does the teen brains and how to keep it off their devices? Most parents have no understanding. And no comprehension of the damage of what pornography can do to a young person. So when you start to see these outbursts of mass violence, they are all downstream, they're all tributaries of chemical imbalances that could be attributed to, I think the over prescription antidepressants and for once, if the Republican Party, I think, wanted to really represent the interest of their voters. How many Republicans running for office say, hey, we're medicating our children too much. And by the way, this ties into our parents party. Idea. Why are we vaccinating 6 months year old? Why are we having young kids be exposed to drag queen events? Why are these are good questions, by the way? And what the response from the nihilist would be, well, what difference does it make? What difference does it make? And from my experience with talking to other people, far too many psychiatrists are just pushing pills on people. They're not actually doing CBT counseling. They're not actually doing deep and constructive therapy. They could just be pushing pills on people, especially I mean, if you are prescribing psychiatric drugs to preschoolers, there's according to the data, there's hundreds of thousands of preschoolers that are on Ritalin. What is the long-term impact of that? Does that make a child more or less likely to have social or antisocial tendencies? So don't be surprised when all of a sudden you mix all these together, you have this philosophical contagion. You have a massive reservoir of interventions. We don't even know what it does to children. It says here, quote, the psychiatric drugging of our children a development, a developing international crisis. Are you even allowed to say this out loud? No. One of the reasons why is the very same reason why we couldn't question the gene therapy called the vaccine. It's the pharmaceutical companies. Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna and Johnson & Johnson was the last time you saw cable television program do a deep dive on antidepressants. And their role potentially on harming and damaging people. Now, mind you, some people take antidepressants and they talk very favorably about it. They said, Charlie, it's a wonderful thing. Other people take them and it intensifies their problem. But how much of that very well could have been solved with healthy living, understanding how dopamine works, maybe regulating your serotonin levels, finding other natural interventions, turmeric, such as trying to lower your inflammation, by the way, inflammation is now shown to be tied to depression according to some studies. Again, a lot of this stuff is debated. That's fine. Again, I'm far from an expert. I'm not trying to proclaim to be one, but just read the literature of people that do know what they're talking about of other neuroscientists, and the takeaway that is now overwhelming in kind of the dissident neuroscientist community is these drugs might be doing more harm than good. That is the big takeaway. The reflex is medicate, isolate, put them in front of a screen and don't interrupt them despite how much pornography they're watching, video games they're playing or substances they're putting in their body. That removes you from the richness of life. That is the perfect incubator. It is a Petri dish for nihilism. What we've created. You see, don't be shocked when a young person says, I don't know what's real because all they've been looking at is fantasy. They've been looking at fantasy when it comes to sexual interactions. Fantasy when it comes to physical interactions. Fantasy when it comes to intimacy. And then if they have a problem like, well, gotta intervene with SSRIs or benzodiazepines or prozac or zoloft and then they go down on the curve and they do more of it and the cycle continues. It's easy to blame the guns. But I think there's a deeper structural problem with the over medication of children, the isolation of them, the lack of parenting that is correcting these incredibly damaging technological influences that I've mentioned previously. You want to get your voters attention? You want to actually solve people's problems, talk about these things. I love your thoughts, freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. That's freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. And of course, all of this, all of that pales in comparison with the spiritual dimension in our spiritual crisis. The spiritual famine that we're living through right now. A Malcolm emailed us some a good percentage of kids today quite literally use bad mental health as a way to become popular. I graduated high school, so I was around it all the time. Depression has become so hugely popular within this generation that quote depressed people have seemingly created a click granted I can't say all of them are faking it, but it's clear a chunk R it sucks to see a genuine mental problem be used for popularity sake. I can't comment on that,.

ADHD autism Andrew huberman lempke depression AstraZeneca Moderna United States Republican Party Johnson & Johnson Pfizer Charlie Kirk Charlie Malcolm Depression
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

08:18 min | 6 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"The amount of people you have to hire just to be able to sustain the volume. Of work, open secrets dot org reports unprecedented $1 billion first quarter lobbying haul puts 2022 on track for a record year. This year is on track for record lobbying spending. After lobbyists collectively clocked the first biggest, the biggest first quarter haul in history, with more than $1 billion disclosed during the first quarter of 2022 alone. The federal budget was the most lobbied issue from January through March. With 3000 394 clients paying for lobbying on the issue. Health issues are also heavily lobbied with 2068 clients. You see, the bigger the government, the more the opportunity for corporations not to worry about how to make better products or to persuade you to buy their products or to be able to develop better services, but instead they want to be able to sneak their way in to the federal treasury, your taxpayer money and get their part. This is all while Business Insider, which is a rag of a website, says a wave of layoffs is sweeping the United States. Here are the firms that have announced cut so far from compass to coinbase. Layoffs are coming. For months, employees thought they could just show up late to work, expect a 15 to 20% raise, get their stimulus check, no more, layoffs are here. Peloton has already laid off thousands of employees. Online car dealer carvana has slashed 12% of its workforce. Companies like Netflix are making cuts. Business growth is slowing while labor costs are increasing. This is the crass crash that we've been talking about for some time. But what we're seeing now is the economy is in such fragile footing unless you work for a lobbying firm. Lobbying related to health continues to dominate spending as recovery from the coronavirus pandemic continues. So while they were always talking about public health and stopping the spread. While they were pushing forward to pushing aggressively to try to have more spending against COVID, Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna and Johnson & Johnson amongst many others, BioNTech saw a once in a generation opportunity to be able to skim off the federal treasury of your money to make them rich so what do they do? They hire lobbyists. The larger the government, the more opportunity for corruption. This is one of the things I laugh, you know what Bernie Sanders and all of his supporters. They say, well, we want to stop corruption in government. Oh, how by making government bigger? We want corporations to be weaker, or by how by making the government bigger that would actually make the corporations stronger. You ask them, do you trust the government? And they say, oh, no, we hate the government. We don't trust the government, then why would you want to make that government bigger? And more powerful. Why would you make the government stronger? Pharmaceutical research and manufacturers of America ranked third overall in the first quarter of 2022 with nearly 8.3 million in spending during that period. The pharmaceutical industry trade group was the third largest spending of 2021 and over $30 million for that year. So you have a $1 billion being spent on corporate America and an unprecedented sum, according to open secrets. Think about what they're not spending money on. They're not spending money on new products, they're not spending money on research and develop, but they still are, but that money isn't being allocated as much for those things. Instead, they see the greatest bang for their buck, hiring a lobbyist for a $150,000 a month. By hiring a lobbyist for a $150,000 a month, they're able to navigate the halls of Congress. So here's how it works. Let's say you are Pfizer. And number one, Pfizer doesn't want to be aggressively investigated by the federal government. They want to continue to be able to approve vaccines for children. They want to continue to be doing all sorts of sneaky and deceitful and treacherous things. But Pfizer also wants to continue to receive billions of dollars from the federal government in mandatory vaccine expenditures in all sorts of different things. So what Pfizer will do is they will go higher a lobbying firm on what is metaphorically called K street in Washington, D.C.. It's literally called K street. And so on K street, it's kind of known as the lobbying capital of Washington D.C.. They will hire, let's just say Sal and mo's lobbying shop. So they will pay Sal and Moe an extraordinary amount of money. Now this is one of the ways that corporations are able to give money directly to politicians without giving money directly to politicians. So what they will do is they will give these lobbyists let's say a 150,000 to $200,000 a month and these lobbyists will, of course, take some of it for themselves, they'll pay some overhead, you know, they'll pay for some office space, but they'll use a lot of it to then go give direct contributions to senator Chuck Schumer or to senator John cornyn. So what they'll do is Sal and Moe's lobbying shop will take that amount of money from Pfizer. They'll take that amount of money from AstraZeneca, they'll take that money from Raytheon, they'll take that money from Northrop Grumman, and they'll host a fundraiser at the Capitol Hill club, saying join us in support of the candidacy for Chuck Schumer for Senate majority leader or join us for this fundraiser for Nancy Pelosi. And by the Republicans and Democrats are equal offenders of this. So they'll do this fundraiser. Now, by law corporations can not give money directly to these politicians. There's ways they get around it. We'll talk about that in a second. This is one of them. This is the easiest way to get around it. So they hire the lobbyists, but the lobbyists is then able to give money directly to these candidates. But they don't just write the check, they have to do a whole event. And then they have a briefing with the politician before the event. So then before the event at the Capitol Hill club, they'll rent a small room next door and since they're registered lobbyists, they're allowed to do this legally. I'm not accusing anything of illegal. Is it unethical and sloppy and is it just gross? Yes, but it's not illegal. These lobbyists know what they're doing. So they sit down with the politician. I say, yes, we have all these people waiting for you in the next room. All of whom, by the way, are lobbyists that work for them who all give the 1000 or $2000, and there's kind of a wink and a nod that you were supposed to give these candidates. Now, you're not allowed to reimburse campaign contributions. That is illegal, but there's an expectation that if you work at the highest levels of these lobbying firms that you better put aside money every single year to give money to politicians, kind of baked into the deal. Now that's borderline legal and illegal, and that's something that lobbyists are always kind of on the edge with. But they'll sit down the politicians will say, okay, senator Schumer, you know, I think it's a really important that we send $40 billion to Ukraine. And they'll be saying this to the politician and Schumer will be listening to all of this or whomever Pelosi or cornyn or whatever, and they'll be listening to this. And the politician knows why the lobbyist is saying that. The lobbyist is being paid to say this, the politician knows that when they walk into the next room and the fundraiser, they're going to receive money under kind of the wink and not promise that they're going to advance the interests of the corporation. Whatever that corporation might be. Now, this system has been getting more and more broken, but these corporations have just become so cavalier and brazen. And we live now in a situation where the wealthiest counties in America are surrounding Washington, D.C.. Instead of trying to extract oil or trying to develop new products or build cars, the wealthiest counties are where you don't make anything of value, you extract from everywhere else, and you redistribute it and launder for your own part. As you struggle to pay your bills lobbyists are richer than ever, and it's boom town in Washington, D.C...

federal treasury Pfizer Business Insider carvana COVID AstraZeneca Moderna Capitol Hill club Sal pharmaceutical industry trade America Washington, D.C. Washington D.C. Bernie Sanders Moe
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:02 min | 6 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Who's doing well right now? What business is a booming? Well, oil's doing okay. Tech is down, new home sales are down, restaurants are down consumer spending is down. We are on the cusp of a recession. But there is one industry that if you are fortunate enough to be in, that you are seeing record halls. Business is better than ever before. You can't believe the amount of new interest in clients that you're able to recruit. The amount of people you have to hire just to be able to sustain the volume. Of work, open secrets dot org reports unprecedented $1 billion first quarter lobbying haul puts 2022 on track for a record year. This year is on track for record lobbying spending. After lobbyists collectively clocked the first biggest, the biggest first quarter haul in history, with more than $1 billion disclosed during the first quarter of 2022 alone. The federal budget was the most lobbied issue from January through March. With 3000 394 clients paying for lobbying on the issue. Health issues are also heavily lobbied with 2068 clients. You see, the bigger the government, the more the opportunity for corporations not to worry about how to make better products or to persuade you to buy their products or to be able to develop better services, but instead they want to be able to sneak their way in to the federal treasury, your taxpayer money and get their part. This is all while Business Insider, which is a rag of a website, says a wave of layoffs is sweeping the United States.

federal treasury Pfizer Business Insider carvana COVID AstraZeneca Moderna Capitol Hill club Sal pharmaceutical industry trade America Washington, D.C. Washington D.C. Bernie Sanders Moe
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

03:51 min | 8 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"True. So I'll add on that. I say be distrustful, also of the corporate bureaucracy too, not just the government one. This was something that was, I never really trusted corporations to bully, but boy, do I have a disgust for them after these last couple of years, the funding of BLM, the Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, the major media companies. I just don't like big anymore. I don't like big companies. I don't like big pharma. I don't like big government. I don't like big media. I don't like some actually most big churches, separate conversation for a different time. I think there needs to be like a reemergence of the small, but the strong. It could be a big family, but it's relatively not big compared to what's happening in the country. You know what I mean by big. I mean, Disney, $250 billion. Bureaucratic and monolithic and politically correct. And I think that there is a driven by activism rather than precisely. And so that's kind of been one of the learning lessons for me is that it's more than just big government we're fighting, right? It's more than just the union of big government and big corporations. It's just bigness. And they've been captured by these ideologues. And they're going to have a lot of power for years to come. And so I would encourage as many young people as possible. Start new stuff, start new businesses, start new ventures, and start families, you're exactly right, Al. I mean, we got a lot of emails on our program. And I probably get 250 of these a week. Probably a month, not a week. That's probably mine. But it's at least of men in their 30s and women in their 30s. Charlie, I can't find anyone. And I always respond the same way where you open to marrying in your early 20s. And 99% say no, I was focused on my career. Say, okay, well, best of luck. I wish you well. But if you're not prioritizing marriage when the good ones are available, then by definition. You know what you should do? You should reply to the guy and CC, the girl. Just emailed you and was like, there you go. Way too much liability involved. Yeah. Okay. That's very true. Yeah, exactly. I should not stand far away from that. But yeah, but I can give some advice to men you can give us advice to women. Most men in America are grown infants. They got to get their life together. There's a massive over drinking problem with young men in America. I don't know where this comes from. It is a massive pornography problem. Huge pornography problem, just debated someone who was part of that and you guys could check out that whole debate was a trans porn person, whatever that is. It was really the whole thing was bizarre. No, I think it should be just outright banned by the government, by the way. Pornography should be banned and almost impossible to ask. And I've said that for a while. And you know what's so funny? You know what's so funny is someone says Charlie, people will still get to it. I say, okay, then why does the pornography industry lobby against the ban? Yeah. Because it would hurt their business model. It's not a matter of a 100%. Okay, it's a matter of, can you get 10% less people consuming? 20%, 30%. That would be a massive achievement. So by the way, by that logic you would have no laws. Well, and you kind of think about it. Maybe they do want no laws. Except if you misgender somebody, which is like anarcho Turing. NRT for the anarchy for the degeneracy tyranny for the political correctness stuff. Separate lecture for a different time. Term that I love anarcho tyranny. But yeah, so for men out there, I just want to challenge you. There's a beautiful life ahead of you if you want to apply yourself for it and it requires being a man again. So what does that mean? That means being very intentional about boosting your testosterone levels. I'm not kidding, by the way. Like eating red meat and actually lifting weights and acting like a man. I'm not dressing like some androgynous male that's walking the streets of Manhattan. I'm not joking when I say this. At all..

Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna union of big government Johnson & Johnson BLM Charlie Disney America Al Manhattan
If Only We Investigated Russia's Funding of US Anti-Fossil Fuel Groups

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:37 min | 9 months ago

If Only We Investigated Russia's Funding of US Anti-Fossil Fuel Groups

"Cool controls Joe Biden. He's a prisoner of many different groups. He's a prisoner of the teacher unions. He's a prisoner of Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson. Every decision that this administration makes is because of an order given by a group that either helped get him into office that helped implement him into office or that is currently giving him cover fire or is a backbone of the Democrat regime. Well, let's read what one of his, let's say, wardens, believe in because he's a prisoner of somebody. You go to Greenpeace dot org. It says real zero. What is hashtag real zero? Great question Greenpeace writes, first let's start out with net zero a term you've probably heard before. Burn now pay later. Nations of the world pledged in 2015 Paris climate agreement to collectively achieve net zero carbon emissions, globally by 2050. Climate scientists say we must hit net zero to avoid climate catastrophe. It's a goal we should all support. The term net zero is also being exploited by governments and corporations who are using it as smoke screen to keep burning phosphor fuel fossil fuels via a loophole called carbon offset credits. So instead, they want real zero, not net zero. The only way out of the climate crisis is to get to net zero. Real zero equals net zero minus offsets. It means reducing and stopping all carbon emissions before they are put into the atmosphere. It means full speed ahead to a transformation of our energy and transport systems to 100% renewable sources. This is Greenpeace dot org. No more fossil fuel burning, no offsetting scams. This is the website you can see it for yourself. It's Greenpeace dot org. Sierra club is very similar. Now again, we've gone through in great detail, the evidence that shows that Russia has been funding green energy groups. We should be having criminal investigations into how Russia has been covertly funding of these anti fossil fuel groups, the hill dot com calls for this. Investigate Russia's covert funding of U.S. anti fossil fuel groups makes you wonder how successful the green energy groups would have been, the last couple years, if our government actually spent time investigating legitimate Russian collusion instead of whether or not Donald Trump had any sort of ties to the Russian Kremlin, which of course he didn't.

Moderna Astrazeneca Joe Biden Johnson & Johnson Pfizer Greenpeace Paris Russia Sierra Club U.S. Donald Trump
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

04:00 min | 11 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"CNN was totally taken off guard by this. If you look at the medical industrial complex, they're pushing boosters, they're pushing vaccines on children, will the World Health Organization chief scientist comes out and says there's no evidence right now that healthy children are healthy adolescents need boosters. No evidence at all. Play cut 93. There's no evidence right now that healthy children or healthy adolescents need boosters, no evidence at all. So this is why the sage, which is our technical expert body that makes policy recommendations has been meeting and will continue to meet will meet later this week to consider the specific question of how should countries think about giving boosters to their populations with a view to protecting people. Now, according to doctor Pierre Corey, here's where we think he thinks we are. And that's the World Health Organization saying that we should not vaccinate healthy children. Doctor Edward Ryan, director of international infectious disease service at Massachusetts general said, we're close to a 100% of the positive cases in Massachusetts are a deltas almost completely gone from New England. This surge will peak sometime between now and the 21st, which is actually today. Today is supposed to be the end of the surge of a Macron. And then begin a quick downhill journey of two to four weeks. We'll then end up with a 20 to 50% positivity rate. February will be clean up mode and march will begin to return to normal. A Macron lives in your nose and upper upper respiratory system, which is what makes it so contagious, but it isn't able to bond with your lungs, like the other variants. The increased hospitalization should be taken with a grain of salt, as most of them are secondary admissions for people like surgery, broken bones, or people who are tested for COVID. We won't need a booster for Alma cron he writes because there wouldn't be able to develop one and it's completely gone and we're all going to get it, which gives us immunity, and we need to get through it. And according to doctor Chris martinson, who we had on our podcast, Alma cron contains all the other variants within this. Doctor Chris martinson and others have hypothesized they've speculated, they've conjectured that all Macron very well might have been a naturally developed virus out of a laboratory as an open air vaccine to try to get to the endemic phase. COVID-19, COVID will join four other coronavirus as we deal with that cause common cold, upper respiratory infections, RSV, et cetera, it will become a pediatric disease. Mainly because affecting young children with no immunity. About 40% of those infected will be asymptomatic, rapid tests are about 50 to 80% sensitive with those as symptoms, and we are finding the last war with COVID. He writes. And there's no need to stay home from work or to be a hermit unless your immunocompromised 85 or older and Springer summer he says will be really nice. Now I just want to add a little bit of a word of caution. If you think Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna Johnson & Johnson, the lockdown artist, the World Health Organization, Klaus Schwab, Anthony Fauci Bezos, and all these other people are just going to give up their newfound power because we enter endemic phase, you're mistaken. These people are going to find a new way to try and lock down countries, hold onto power, regardless of where things are trending. And this is where the citizen not the subject or the surf matters more than ever before. To where the citizen needs to take their stand with their rights granted them by God and not by government. And demand that whatever construct they're living under backs off. And by the way, what I just read from is the director of global infectious diseases at mass general. We're already seeing the cratering stock price of Moderna, we're seeing the cratering stock.

Alma cron World Health Organization Chris martinson Pierre Corey Edward Ryan international infectious disea Massachusetts CNN upper respiratory infections pediatric disease COVID New England AstraZeneca Moderna Johnson & Klaus Schwab Anthony Fauci Bezos Pfizer
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

03:05 min | 11 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"That's why we are here. Brought to you by the lone experts I trust, Andrew and Todd at Sierra Pacific mortgage at Andrew and Todd dot com. There's a lot of stories I want to get to here. One story that I never thought would be controversial, but it's something that needs to kind of be built out, which is the intentional suppression of natural immunity. If you have fought through getting the Chinese Fauci coronavirus, you are infected. You got the natural antibodies. One would think that there would be an admission and acceptance amongst the people in charge that you should be treated as if you are quote unquote naturally inoculated or naturally vaccinated. There's always been this push against natural immunity. There's never been an allowance for natural immunity. For reasons that are quite obvious such as trying to pander to Pfizer and AstraZeneca Moderna and Johnson & Johnson in the pharmaceutical vaccine lobby, but also it's because they know that if they actually counted antibody tests and natural immunity, all of a sudden the power that the state has assumed would vanish and disappear. For the past 2500 years, natural immunity has been the accepted response to viral infections. There used to be chickenpox parties when children grew up. I knew that when I grew up I got chickenpox, wasn't fun. Scratch yourself a lot. You take an oatmeal bath, and then you get it, you never get it again. And now they're pushing a chickenpox vaccine. That some people say work. Some people say it doesn't work. However, natural immunity when it comes to COVID for whatever reason has never been allowed to enter the conversation. CDC study, though has come out, this is natural immunity provides significantly more protection against COVID than just a vaccine. A study by the CDC released on Wednesday shows that those who have recovered from COVID-19 have more protection against infection than those who have only been vaccinated. Researchers reviewed data from California, New York from made in November when the delta variant was dominant in the United States. By the first week of October COVID-19 rates among the vaccinated with no previous infection were 6.2 times lower in California and 4.5 times lower New York than among the unvaccinated with no previous infection. The individuals most protected against the infection were those that had previously had COVID-19. Now they're adding this wrinkle where they say that, well, you're super protected if you're vaccinated and you get COVID-19. Really, is that a vaccine or an injectable therapeutic then? So CNN reports this and they're trying the best to try to spin it because people like Aaron Rodgers and Joe Rogan have been saying, well, what about natural meaning? What about people that have got over the virus and they don't need to go take a vaccine?.

Sierra Pacific mortgage Todd AstraZeneca Moderna Andrew chickenpox Johnson & Johnson CDC COVID Pfizer California New York United States CNN Joe Rogan Aaron Rodgers
The Intentional Suppression of Natural Immunity

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:07 min | 11 months ago

The Intentional Suppression of Natural Immunity

"One story that I never thought would be controversial, but it's something that needs to kind of be built out, which is the intentional suppression of natural immunity. If you have fought through getting the Chinese Fauci coronavirus, you are infected. You got the natural antibodies. One would think that there would be an admission and acceptance amongst the people in charge that you should be treated as if you are quote unquote naturally inoculated or naturally vaccinated. There's always been this push against natural immunity. There's never been an allowance for natural immunity. For reasons that are quite obvious such as trying to pander to Pfizer and AstraZeneca Moderna and Johnson & Johnson in the pharmaceutical vaccine lobby, but also it's because they know that if they actually counted antibody tests and natural immunity, all of a sudden the power that the state has assumed would vanish and disappear.

Astrazeneca Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:20 min | 11 months ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Not wise. Play cut 17. Rogan's been talking about it that I went crazy talking about it. You can't get those things to save your life now, literally. It's disgusting. It's disgusting. Yeah, it's one of the craziest things that I've ever witnessed in my life. You want to know what's scary? But I could get some pain pills quicker than I could get monoclonal antibodies. No, not maybe. That's a fact. Dana continues in cut 19. Dana White with more wisdom than Anthony Fauci play cut 19. Medicine that absolutely works. They're keeping from it. I don't want to get too political and start getting into all this. Ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies have been around for a long time. Now all of a sudden you can't dig them up to save your life, the doctors won't give them to you. Rogan's been talking about it that I went crazy talking about it. You can't get those things to save your life now. And despite all the pressure to try to cancel and to try to restrict Joe Rogan and Dana White, they're stronger than ever. The truth is getting out. It's one of the reasons why the Democrats are collapsing in such record numbers because those of us that have been talking about the necessary regimen of early treatments of vitamin D levels of azithromycin aspirin melatonin, Ivermectin hydroxychloroquine, getting your life together, as far as having a healthy diet and healthy balance, getting enough sleep, all the sorts of necessary prerequisites to be able to fight off infectious disease, the Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna Johnson & Johnson, vaccine lobby, they continue with full fledged propaganda disinformation campaigns to try and delegitimize people like Rogan and Dana White by this letter, this 270 scientists, you know what? I would love and this will never happen because there's more important things and probably shouldn't, but I'd love an investigation into what organization is behind the 270 scientist letter. I guarantee you their affiliated with the pharmaceutical industry. They did this exact same thing with the war industry. They do the same thing. They used to do the same thing with big tobacco. Get a bunch of scientists assign a letter and everyone will back off. Thanks so much for listening to everybody email us your thoughts always freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. God bless you guys, talk to you soon. For more, on many of these stories and news you can trust. Go to Charlie Kirk dot com..

Rogan Dana White Anthony Fauci Joe Rogan AstraZeneca Moderna Johnson & Dana infectious disease Pfizer Charlie Kirk
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

06:49 min | 1 year ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"A typical Thanksgiving meal. Thanksgiving holiday with your family. The thing we are concerned about is the people who are not vaccinated. So what's going on in England? Not the United Kingdom just England. Of course, Fauci does not care about data, Fauci is an ideologue. He's a pathological individual. Never has to be cross examined about what's really happening. According to Alex berenson, vaccinated English adults under 60. Are dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age. And has been that case for 6 months. This chart may seem unbelievable, or impossible, but it's correct based on weekly data from the British government. Could we get that do we have the chart that we could put up on screen? I'll experience in rights I have checked the underlying dataset myself and the graph is correct. Vaccinated people under 60 are twice as likely to die as unvaccinated people. The overall deaths in Britain are running well above normal. Do you see that? That people who are unvaccinated are actually doing better against the foushee virus than people who are vaccinated. And we saw this entire saga also unfold in Israel, months ago. Why aren't we allowed to talk about this? Why is this not the number one news story in the country? Is the vaccine helping? Or in the United Kingdom? I'm sorry in England. Let's just say England. Why is it that people that are vaccinated under 60 have twice the rate of dying than people who are unvaccinated? What's the explanation for that? New Zealand has come out and they've been very clear. They say, look, if you get a vaccine pass, you could do everything, but that's it. Meaning you get the vaccine pass or your life is over. Play cut 6. It's actually really straightforward. If you've got a vaccine card, you can do everything. Basically, that's it. That's it. You hear that everybody? You get the vaccine passport in New Zealand or your life is over. In Australia, the army is now transferring positive COVID cases and contacts to quarantine camps, play cut 5. It's highly likely that more residents be transferred to house brings today, either as positive cases or close contacts. We've already identified 38 close contacts in the jury, and that number will go up. Those 38 are being transferred now. I contacted the prime minister last night. We are grateful for the support of about 20 ADF personnel as well as army trucks to assist with transfer of positive cases in close contacts and to support the communities. Transporting people who have COVID to camps in Australia. You know most Americans don't know anything about this. Most Americans don't know anything about azithromycin, aspirin, hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin. Monoclonal antibodies, more vaccinated people are dying of COVID-19, according to NBC Montana. Data from several states and the federal government suggests deaths among Americans fully vaccinated against COVID-19 rose sharply amid the nation's most recent surge of infections, but experts say that it's not expected. Oh, it's not unexpected then what is it? Is it a vaccine or is it a treatment? And why did you change the definition of the vaccine from the CDC? I have been so disappointed at how there is a lack of any sort of dialog or discussion about this. I have I have an open invitation to anyone who wants to come on the show. And I'm just going to ask questions. I'm just going to ask some very simple questions of why is it that the most vaccinated state in the country, Vermont, last week, I don't know if it's still the case, had the highest COVID rate of any state in the country? Why is that? Why is it the most vaccinated countries on the planet? Israel Singapore and Gibraltar have some of the highest COVID transmission rates in the country. Why is that? Why is our government putting of pushing a vaccine to children, so they don't have a risk of dying from a virus? They don't have a big risk of dying from? Why can't we have a robust discussion about the adverse events? That are connected to a vaccine, the vaccine adverse event reporting system. Why can't we talk about that? But Fauci says listen in order to be fully vaccinated, you have to get your booster shot. When will a majority of Americans realize this is nothing more than a profit enriching scheme for companies that hate you? Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna, Johnson & Johnson you think they really want your health? Do you think they really have your health in mind when they put this forward? Why are we never allowed to talk about early treatments? Early intervention. Vitamin D deficiencies, vitamin C, hydration, aspirin, reduces hospitalizations dramatically resend me the aspirin article please. In the meantime, play cut 8. If you are 18 or older and you've been vaccinated, fully vaccinated with the Moderna or the Pfizer mRNA 6 months or more ago, get a booster. If it's J&J and it's two months ago or more get a boost. I don't think we should get hung up on should may. Just go out and get boosted. Just go out and get it. California's COVID rate is now twice that of Florida's, despite mass mandates and higher vaccination rates. Daniel Horowitz came on our program, and one of the most amazing interviews I think we've ever done. He argued that this is a leaky vaccine. This could actually be contributing to the spread. Now we're not going to go deep. We're not going to go that deep into it on this show. That's not our time or place to do that. But I'm asking you the question. Why is it that the states that heavily vaccinate? With the higher vaccination rates, why is it that they have higher rates of COVID? And shouldn't the whole conversation be that someone has COVID? What can we do early to try to intervene? I've heard horror stories from friends and family. Of people that have got COVID they go to the hospital, they basically just set you up on a ventilator and wish you luck. No Ivermectin hydroxychloroquine azithromycin monoclonal antibodies are aspirin. Simple blood thinner, Jerusalem post, the and by the way, the fact that this story was not heavily covered, everyone has aspirin in their home 30 million people take aspirin every single day. Jerusalem post dot com aspirin lowers risk of COVID, new findings support preliminary Israeli trial..

Fauci England Alex berenson United Kingdom New Zealand British government army Israel Australia ADF AstraZeneca Moderna Britain Pfizer NBC CDC Montana federal government Gibraltar Daniel Horowitz Vermont
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

05:48 min | 1 year ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Vehicle accidents. So if a school is going to be consistent, if the school is going to start mandating vaccines, if the state of California is going to be consistent and start mandating vaccines, they need to say young children ages 5 to 14 are not allowed to ride in cars anymore. If it's all about safety, it's the fair thing to do. Children for ages 5 to 14, no more riding in cars. No more being a passenger in a car. A child is 9 times more likely. Let me say it again. 9 times more likely to die in a car accident than from the Fauci virus. Suicide. A child is 7 times more likely to die from suicide than from the Fauci virus. A child is three and a half times more likely to die from being a homicide victim ages 5 to 14 than from the Fauci virus. A child is three times more likely to die from cardiovascular disease than from the Fauci virus. A child age 5 through 14 is about twice as likely to die from drowning than from COVID. A child is more likely ages 5 to 14 to die from flu and pneumonia than from COVID. And an a child age 5 through 14 is equally as likely to die from suffocation and then from COVID. So if we're going to be consistent, we now need a well funded top down national campaign that says that children ages 5 to 14 are no longer allowed to drive in cars. The science tells us that everybody. The new prerogative from the top is that we no longer are going to tolerate anyone dying from anything any form of risk, any allowance of liberty must be clamped down and we must say no movement of people. And yet we have a 7 times more likely chance for young children to die from suicide than from the Chinese coronavirus Fauci virus. Yet, what are we doing to stop that we're doing the opposite? We're masking our children. We're canceling their sporting events. We lock down their schools. We are dehumanizing and depersonalizing young children. We're getting them addicted to their devices that have that have a now proven link to mental health issues. So what is behind this massive push to vaccinate children ages 5 to 14 that certainly isn't the annual deaths among children in the United States, the CDC's own data shows that cancer vehicle accident suicide homicide cardiovascular disease drowning flu pneumonia are considerably larger risks. For ages, children ages 5 to 14, than from the Chinese coronavirus. And yet the food and drug administrations panel, which is largely bought by Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna Johnson Johnson and BioTech because everyone who sits on that panel is going to want to work for them someday is going to want to benefit from these multi $1 trillion companies collective value together, they vote 17 nothing in favor of this. 17 nothing. And now the state of California says that they're going to mandate it for young children ages 5 to 14. And this is specifically behind the Pfizer vaccine and medical exemptions and religious exemptions are being denied. All across the country. So before we try to prescribe a solution of the vaccine for children, and we already have all the questions around the leaky vaccine, we did an entire podcast with Daniel Horowitz about this about how the most vaccinated countries in the world have the highest virus transmission rates that a vast majority of deaths in the United Kingdom are actually vaccinated people. We've gone into great detail about that. But before we go any further and we take the bait of the medical industrial complex and the pharmaceutical elite, we need to ask the question, what is the problem we're trying to solve? Is there a massive reason to now forcibly inoculate children? 70% of deaths in the United Kingdom recently were vaccinated. 70% of deaths in the United Kingdom. And wait till you hear this quote. You guys are going to have to stay right there. The quote from one of the doctors on the panel, will take your breath away. It's doctor Rubin. I was so stunned I read this. I made Connor find the original context and it is exactly true. What was said? By this doctor on the panel of the Food and Drug Administration, when it comes to the safety of the vaccine, every mom and dad needs to hear what this doctor has said. This needs to be plastered in national news about when he was asked about, is this vaccine actually safe? And we're going to go into the myocarditis rates. We're going to go into the rates of advent adverse events when it comes to the vaccine. What's the problem we're trying to solve? Or are we just trying to make the pharmaceutical companies richer? Give the billionaires more power. It sure seems that way. I'm Antonio guys about relief factor for quite some time, and truth is I know millions of people are in fact 100 million people in some kind of pain like producer Andrew who could walk. He was a hobbled individual. He was bad ridden in his chair, complaining all the time. And then all of a sudden we got this call from a leaf factor that said, hey, we want to partner with your show. We're going to send you some relief factor. Producer Andrew got it. He took it, got a little bit better. Took some more, got a little bit better next thing you know, he's doing the false berry flop like you wouldn't believe. In fact, he might be training for an Iron Man. It's pretty incredible. Now he says it's thanks to early factor, I.

COVID pneumonia cancer vehicle accident suicid food and drug administrations AstraZeneca Moderna Johnson Jo flu Pfizer California Daniel Horowitz cardiovascular disease United Kingdom CDC panel of the Food and Drug Adm United States Rubin Connor Andrew Antonio
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:21 min | 1 year ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Why do we need to be vaccinating children? Our children at a considerable risk of dying from the Fauci virus. Our children at a considerable risk, absent other daily activities, from dying from the virus. The CDC's own data, which has been published, shows that children one to four year olds per 100,000 deaths the most common death is drowning. At 2.8 per 100,000. Then vehicle accidents at 2.3 per 100,000. Homicide, 2.2 per 100,000. Cancer, two per 100,000. Cardiovascular disease, one death per 100,000. Flu and pneumonia, .8 deaths per 100,000. And that's annual deaths among children per 100,000. I'm not exactly sure how they tabulate this, but the numbers themselves of what actually that the most at risk for is very, very helpful. A child is four times more likely ages one to four to die from the Fauci virus to die from flu pneumonia than from the Fauci virus. Four times more likely. And that's the CDC's own data. .2 for COVID. How about children 5 to 14 years old? Is there a massive risk of children 5 to 14 years old? Such a massive risk that we now need to forcibly inoculate children using either Pfizer Johnson & Johnson Moderna vaccine. With side effects that are growing and questions that are increasing. What's the number one cause of death for children ages 5 to 14? Answer cancer. The next cause of death? Vehicle accidents. So if a school is going to be consistent, if the school is going to start mandating vaccines, if the state of California is going to be consistent and start mandating vaccines, they need to say young children ages 5 to 14 are not allowed to ride in cars anymore. If it's all about safety, it's the fair thing

COVID pneumonia cancer vehicle accident suicid food and drug administrations AstraZeneca Moderna Johnson Jo flu Pfizer California Daniel Horowitz cardiovascular disease United Kingdom CDC panel of the Food and Drug Adm United States Rubin Connor Andrew Antonio
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

02:10 min | 1 year ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Being here tonight. I appreciate it. Pleasure to meet you. I just have one quick question. What is your opinion on mandatory vaccinations in the military, personally, it was almost mandatory at my college unless you wanted to use a religious exemption? What is your view on that? Yeah, so we at turning point USA. We've taken an organizational view that no person should be forced to get the vaccine against their will. And it is immoral and it is wrong and it is evil to force people to get vaccines, experimental medicine. You might be pro vaccine here tonight, whatever. I'm not here to convince you otherwise. The fact is don't force me otherwise. Don't use force of losing a job, government force, or all of these sorts of different ways. To try and mock and ridicule and push people in a direction to do that. So are you in the military right now? Or I'm not no. Okay. Well, for people that are in the military, this is a very serious thing. And it's time for elected officials that are conservatives to start to stand up and to defend the medical rights of servicemen and women across the country. And no one should be forced to get it against their will. I've been very public on this issue. And the final thing I'll say with this, it was kind of with this is that I was always told to believe my body my choice, you know, everyone's individual sovereignty instead. Now it's let's do whatever Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna and Johnson & Johnson want and the latest study shows the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is 3% effective. 3% effective. You know what's affected? They never want to talk about natural immunity. They never want to talk about azithromycin. They never want to talk about hydroxychloroquine. They never want to talk about Ivermectin. They never want to talk about aspirin, which is now proven to be a very effective treatment to reduce hospitalizations. And you can look at the clinical data itself. Instead, they are trying to keep people in a perpetual state of fear and control by locking us down, masking us up and firing people based on vaccines. We must.

AstraZeneca Moderna Johnson & Johnson USA Pfizer
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:35 min | 1 year ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Yet our country is controlled by Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and BioTech, and therefore we're not even allowed to have a conversation about Ivermectin, but the few people that are free speech warriors like Joe Rogan he does not let up cut 55 and then we'll go through all three cuts here and this is by the way, if you have not listened to this podcast discussed with Sanjay Gupta, it's incredible. Because maybe Sanjay Gupta thought that they were gonna have a nice little conversation about why people need to wear masks. I don't know what he was thinking. Going on Joe Rogan's show. Joe is mad. And good for Joe, Joe Rogan as Sanjay Gupta, does it bother you that CNN lied about me? Cut 55. Does it bother you that the news network you work for? Out and out lied. Without right lied about me taking horse dewormer. They shouldn't have said that. Why did they do that? I don't know. You didn't ask? I didn't think there was a guy over there. I didn't ask. I should have asked glee. No. I watched. Gorgeous. I want to frame that because Joe's Joe's because we see this little shriveling of a weak human Sanjay Gupta. I should have asked. I don't know. You understand that these media reporters have never been called out before? I think Sanjay Gupta was there to promote a book. I don't think it's doing very well after that. I know, I think he has a new book like COVID COVID war zero or something. I really think it's called World War COVID. I think that's the name of the book. And so CNN he's the medical guy there, and so Joe says, you're the medical guy there. What do you mean?

Joe Rogan Sanjay Gupta Uttar Pradesh Thunberg CNN India AstraZeneca Moderna Kirk Charlie Joe Jimmy Carter Nobel Prize Los Angeles Conor Johnson & Johnson Nigeria Pfizer Africa Tucker Carlson Bret Weinstein
Joe Rogan Forces Dr. Sanjay Gupta to Admit CNN Shouldn't Have Called His COVID Treatment 'Horse Dewormer'

The Charlie Kirk Show

01:35 min | 1 year ago

Joe Rogan Forces Dr. Sanjay Gupta to Admit CNN Shouldn't Have Called His COVID Treatment 'Horse Dewormer'

"Yet our country is controlled by Pfizer AstraZeneca Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and BioTech, and therefore we're not even allowed to have a conversation about Ivermectin, but the few people that are free speech warriors like Joe Rogan he does not let up cut 55 and then we'll go through all three cuts here and this is by the way, if you have not listened to this podcast discussed with Sanjay Gupta, it's incredible. Because maybe Sanjay Gupta thought that they were gonna have a nice little conversation about why people need to wear masks. I don't know what he was thinking. Going on Joe Rogan's show. Joe is mad. And good for Joe, Joe Rogan as Sanjay Gupta, does it bother you that CNN lied about me? Cut 55. Does it bother you that the news network you work for? Out and out lied. Without right lied about me taking horse dewormer. They shouldn't have said that. Why did they do that? I don't know. You didn't ask? I didn't think there was a guy over there. I didn't ask. I should have asked glee. No. I watched. Gorgeous. I want to frame that because Joe's Joe's because we see this little shriveling of a weak human Sanjay Gupta. I should have asked. I don't know. You understand that these media reporters have never been called out before? I think Sanjay Gupta was there to promote a book. I don't think it's doing very well after that. I know, I think he has a new book like COVID COVID war zero or something. I really think it's called World War COVID. I think that's the name of the book. And so CNN he's the medical guy there, and so Joe says, you're the medical guy there. What do you mean?

Sanjay Gupta Joe Rogan Astrazeneca Moderna JOE Johnson & Johnson Pfizer CNN
"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

The Charlie Kirk Show

03:08 min | 1 year ago

"astrazeneca moderna" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show

"Name. If you send your kid to college if your kid is in college right now, they are being exposed to the garbage ideas from a vengeful, hateful 77 year old activist communist activist by the name of Angela Davis. Now Melissa Harris Perry is not a name that you might know, but Melissa Harris Perry was someone that I knew of, quite well. Because she used to be on MSNBC all the time, she was considered to be the more radical voice on cable television for years. Another Marxist. I even seen her very much recently she was fired from MSNBC. She was joy read before joy Reid. And honestly, a little bit more articulate than joy Reid. Let me tell you. Just kind of the ability to make arguments really quickly. I don't really know what happened to Melissa Harris Perry. Perhaps she was too radical for her own good. She said things out loud that she shouldn't have said I think she has her own political consulting firm. She was fired in 2016, three years after this particular clip, surface. I remember when this clip came out, people used to get fired for saying this. People used to have to retreat for saying this very clip. This used to be considered controversial this used to be considered something that not worth commenting, where she said, remember your kids don't belong to you. Now she's a professor and a political commentator. And now this viewpoint is held by the progressive collectivist status Democrat left it's just that she happened to say it out loud. Play cut 45. We have never invested as much in public education as we should have because we've always had kind of a private notion of children. Your kid is yours and totally your responsibility. We haven't had a very collective notion of these are our children. So part of it is we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families and recognize the kids belong to whole communities. Once it's everybody's responsibility and not just the households, then we start making better investments. We have to realize the kids are a community object, not that it's part of your nuclear family, of course not. Now, interestingly enough, she's now an employee of national public radio so your tax dollars are paying for Melissa Harris Perry. I'd prefer for her to be at MSNBC because at least wouldn't be taxpayer funded, even though I'm sure taxpayer dollars actually taxpayer dollars go to MSNBC all the time they're running these vaccine advertisements every 30 seconds, which by the way is one of the great handouts to these big media companies. You can judge a media company. If they dare even ask questions about the vaccine from a media company, then they're in a they're in a category that deserves some deserve some praise. You know how easy it is to get a flow of money from AstraZeneca Moderna, Pfizer Johnson & Johnson, the CDC HHS they are throwing money up this thing right now..

Melissa Harris Perry joy Reid MSNBC Angela Davis AstraZeneca Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson CDC
Covid-19 vaccine: First person receives Pfizer jab in UK

Monocle 24: The Briefing

10:12 min | 2 years ago

Covid-19 vaccine: First person receives Pfizer jab in UK

"Well. Biontech and pfizer's landmark coronavirus vaccine has been given to the first person in the uk as part of a mass immunization program. The uk's vaccine roll it is being watched keenly across the rest of the world has other countries begin. Prepare to vaccinate their own populations for the latest on this. Let's talk to our health and science correspondent. Dr chris smith. Chris is also consultant for all the gist at cambridge university. I good afternoon. Chris tyler so i guess So far so good at least we have. We have a soundbite already. We had at the top of the program from this ninety year old woman. Who's been there the first to be to vaccinated chris last week. We saw a little bit of Chest thumping on the part of some politicians the uk saying look. This is great The uk is steaming ahead. How eagerly he would you say not. Just the immediate neighbors across this side of the channel but around the world are going to be watching. What are they going to watching. Forty you think over the coming days and weeks as this rolls out well think it will be a confidence boost to those other countries because no one likes to be i they unless it's a shorty. A dead cert. There's always some risk with any kind of intervention. And this is no different. So having a regulator a regulator that's world renowned the jewelry the medicines and healthcare products regulatory agency. Which is the. Uk's regulator which prior to just having jurisdiction over the uk walls prior to the brexit transition kicking providing that service for the whole of europe. Now europe does that through the ama it. It gives a precedent that other countries can look to and say right. Okay one fairly ferry. Big actor has gone ahead with this nathan. It's good therefore we're happy to Gives us some confidence too. So i think that there's always that aspect to it and it's coming good for the uk in the sense that it saying here we are. We've had a pretty rough time with this. But now some some fantastic triumph of sciences kicked in and we're about to start deploying this across the country and we're gonna we're gonna protect our outpatients. We have this type of approval from a respected Player how much do agencies elsewhere of course within the eu and obviously similar bodies all over the world. how much does it short circuit For them as you said. It establishes a precedent And does that mean that you have you know days or weeks then knocked off the process. Of course he. I'm sitting here in switzerland. Obviously a lot of talk as well about of course is also on the uk as well so does it actually then really prevent And and and and you do you have a moment where you have a real series of time locked off. They'd process well. The europeans are considering this through the jurisdiction of the ems the european medicines agency but the uk is still subject to a you know and in the uk is used one particular rule which is a regulation one seven four which is a specification for in public health crisis. Or emergency you can. Emergency approved something for use in your particular jurisdiction so the nhra has used that to approve this for the uk. Any other country in europe could've done the same thing so it's quite interesting that they've actually decided to white on a broad overarching decision from the a. But it doesn't matter. Who your regulator is they have to meet the same checks and balances. Because at the end of the day they all the gateway between a manufactured product and the public who going to receive it and it's on their neck that the decision rests so then going to say a will. They did it so we'll kind of ignore with this stuff would just sign it off. They are going to apply wherever they are in the world the same rigorous checks that they would apply whether or not someone else regulated something but it does help to give them confidence and he gives them a bit more political impetus when they see that. Another major regulator has taken a product which is also going to be wheeled out in that particular country and said well you know what's good enough is enough the ganda over the past few weeks. Of course astrazeneca moderna in this case. Biontech visor they. They've all been popping up in the headlines. Chris and of course various speeds that of course these approval processes have been working at now. We have three vaccines. We're we're now told her that there might also now be a fourth which is very much in play might be getting closer to approval. How different are all of these in terms of effectiveness and and do they all function largely the same way or do you. Also because obviously many countries that are hedging their purchasing all of them. Am i going to be particularly concerned. In a couple of weeks. If if i choose to get the moderna vaccine versus the astrazeneca versus the by pfizer one. In fact i think the uk has go options in on seven different vaccines and yes. You're right three of them are nearing the finishing nine in the uk but there are many others waiting in the wings around the world. There are ten different types of vaccine the work in ten different types of ways or being generated a more than forty and now in advanced stages of clinical trials. So pretty soon. We're going to have more vaccines than we can shake a stick at up to a point. That's a good thing and it's a good thing because not vaccines are going to be suitable for all people not vaccines are going to be available to all people not vaccines are going to work in all territories and what i mean by. That is if we take the fiso vaccine as an example. This needs to be kept at minus seventy degrees until five days or so before you're going to use all nine hundred and seventy five doses that are in batch and i've just seen a letter go from medical director saying can we make sure that we we use all nine hundred seventy five days in a within the five days so that we don't waste any of this very precious vaccine. Now that's going to be no use whatsoever in some countries where they don't even have a stable. Electricity supply let alone a stable minus eighty degrees freezer. So therefore having lots of options is a powerful thing also We don't know what the long term outcomes with these vaccines against be. We know that they provide pretty high level of protection but short after the vaccination program is finished in other words in in the weeks to a month or so. The person's completed the vaccine course. They're protected with the fis vaccine to the level of about nine hundred ninety five percent. But what happens in five months. What happens in a year. we don't know. And it may well be that other products that come along are able to confer a longer term protection. They might confer a big boost if you give one of those on top of one of the other products. This is a learning process. We're going to be sort of going through this process as time goes on an. It's always good to have more options. Where this sort of things concerned. If if your project yourselves twelve months twenty four months out do you think we also end up in a place because of because of cost because of stability many other things that they're only going to be potentially to vaccines. Is that the way things often go. The other ones might be effective but they might be too expensive as you said they might be too volatile and they fall by the wayside. I so i guess what i'm getting at. Will there sort of a clear winner in all of this in terms of one of the players and obviously the concoction that that ends up within the syringe. Well it's hard to say. I mean you know it's like niels bohr. Who is the forefather of quantum mechanics. Said prediction is very difficult especially when it concerns the future. But it's it's going to be very hard to know because we don't know what the long term outcome with these agencies. They are expensive. These genetic vaccines that pfizer. Madonna offering all pricey the astra zeneca vaccine. Which is still sitting with the regulator here in the uk. At the moment that one will be much cheaper and is also much easier to deploy and store so that there are pros and cons of all these things and it may not come down to simply a case if this one does this and this one does this therefore two horse race. I think we will definitely be a market for a few of these products whether or not. That market's going to be sufficient to sustain all forty plus of the clinical trials that are going on now but but certainly while the world is rushing to get this stuff in sufficient volume. Because that's the issue at the moment the companies just can't push it out the door fast enough the moment it's any partner storm so people are desperate to access whatever vaccine they can as fast as they can and just before we go chris any sense. When you're maybe discussing with your medica- medical call leaks. What the uptake is is going to be. I was talking to a doctor at the university hospital here in zurich the other day his defense was that you know probably just within the hospital owned probably fifty percent of the staff. You know would not be interested in taking the vaccine. Is that sort of a a pretty good gauge. In terms of how the public will look at this. Or if you're not in the medical trenches all day maybe you're going to be keener to take it any any house view from your side. I'm sensing quite a degree of what we dub vaccine hesitancy based on the questions that are coming into various radio programs on participating in basic enquiries from members of the general public and if you look at the day to this come out of the pew research center in america have been running a number of population surveys in the states and originally that was very alarming showed that fifty percent of people would reject a vaccine offered one at that point in time. They recently repeated that survey found that in fact the uptake had risen to fifty from fifty to sixty percents so in other words forty percent. Turn it down. But that's still forty percent. Turn down right now in the uk. We think it's probably going to be Less than that but at the same time still a significant proportion of people are uncertain citing rapid production very rapid approval. As a reason for concern. I do think this is largely going to take care of itself though because what will happen is that because of the way in which these vaccines are being rolled out to high priority high risk groups. I with a trickle down into the younger echo lonzo society over time by the time many of the people who live in countering who is saying. I'm nervous about this. Come to be offered a vaccine. It will have actually been through a very significant proportion of other people and that may well have in still quite a bit confidence into people are safe track record by then so i think it may be one of those short term problems. The actually takes care of itself. That's what i'm hoping anyway. Chris thanks very much for that. That was monocled health and science. Dr chris smith.

UK Biontech Dr Chris Smith Chris Tyler Pfizer Europe Astrazeneca Moderna Chris Astrazeneca Cambridge University European Medicines Agency AMA Nhra