35 Burst results for "Assange"
Judge sends Assange extradition decision to UK government
"Emphasis emphasis emphasis emphasis judge judge judge judge has has has has formally formally formally formally approved approved approved approved the the the the extradition extradition extradition extradition of of of of cheating cheating cheating cheating in in in in the the the the songs songs songs songs to to to to the the the the United United United United States States States States on on on on spying spying spying spying charges charges charges charges the the the the extradition extradition extradition extradition order order order order comes comes comes comes a a a a month month month month after after after after the the the the UK UK UK UK Supreme Supreme Supreme Supreme Court Court Court Court refused refused refused refused an an an an appeal appeal appeal appeal by by by by phones phones phones phones against against against against the the the the lower lower lower lower court's court's court's court's rooting rooting rooting rooting for for for for his his his his extradition extradition extradition extradition the the the the case case case case will will will will now now now now go go go go to to to to persons persons persons persons interior interior interior interior minister minister minister minister Priti Priti Priti Priti Patel Patel Patel Patel for for for for a a a a decision decision decision decision however however however however the the the the wikileaks wikileaks wikileaks wikileaks founder founder founder founder still still still still has has has has legal legal legal legal avenues avenues avenues avenues of of of of appeal appeal appeal appeal his his his his lawyers lawyers lawyers lawyers have have have have four four four four weeks weeks weeks weeks to to to to make make make make submissions submissions submissions submissions to to to to Patel Patel Patel Patel hand hand hand hand can can can can also also also also seek seek seek seek to to to to appeal appeal appeal appeal to to to to the the the the High High High High Court Court Court Court Karen Karen Karen Karen Chen Chen Chen Chen maths maths maths maths London London London London
"assange" Discussed on Epicenter
"So Gabriel had also joined the telegram group around that time and he mentioned that there was there was indeed an NFT in the works from the Julian Assange side, but the details weren't fully revealed yet as far as when that would be launched or what that would look like. Okay, so can you describe the NFT that was actually put? So the NFT is a collaboration between Assange and Pak called clock and it displays and words the number of days that Assange has been in belmarsh prison. So it basically every day the clock updates counting up the number of days. And whenever he gets released, the clock will go to zero. This mechanism is also tied to an open edition of Vanguard NFTs that park allowed people to mint for free when the auction was underway where people can type in a message and it looks censored on the NFT. Like there's a line going across it going across the message, but also all of these NFTs that people are minted, they're locked in their wallets, and as soon as Julian Assange becomes free, they'll unlock and they'll become uncensored. And by becomes free, you mean leaves very much because those are not the same thing, right? It's dynamic, but in multiple ways. So as Julian's situation changes, I believe that the clock will change. But if Julian, I think one of those ones that we know about is that if Julian walks three free is released and is free, actually free that the clock will turn to zero. So I think what's interesting about it is you've got, I think, 29, I think there was almost 30,000 people who minted one of the open edition. So they've all linked all these open editions that people have. They're all stuck in their wallets. They're all sort of being censored. They're all not free, right? So this concept that all these people have this Julian puck NFT, but they are linked to Julian's freedom. So it's this interesting sort of interplay, I guess, with people and I guess one of the ideas would be that it motivates them to advocate for Julian's freedom or do something for Julian's freedom because NFT is tied to that. If they want to trade it, I guess. So the entire sum that the Dow raised 16 and a half thousand eth was bid on this NFT, right? So basically the second highest bidder is was Jesse power from kraken. You can he did it with his ether dress so basically it was very obvious. Why did the Dow decide or why do we think that tau decided to outbid him by like 11,000 eth? Because I mean in principle that I could have also just kept those two at that disposal, right? Yes, yeah, so this is a lot of debate within the Dow, but within the sort of core group about this strategy that we used and there was so yeah, it was a hotly debated strategy, but this is the sort of the path that was chosen in the end. We had some in some in the group who supported some who didn't and this is the sort of way we went. Within the Dow's structure, there is some representatives from representatives from Julian's family and we sort of we were sort of deciding vote basically between the two groups, two groups in the core, who were going either way. And so we went with the tried and tested where Holland foundation who have been supporting Julian and his legal fees for a long time who have been resisted these regulatory attacks before. So it was a pathway that was tested pathway to get this money to where it needs to be as soon as possible. So what were the arguments against that cause of action? Well, I think so the arguments against. The Dow could use this treasury and potentially. Put it through its governance structure and create a sort of a down model that would have been more sustainable. The Dow still has some treasury. There will be, I think, 5% left in the day of the operations. That would be the JB X yeah, yeah, there will be the JV X tokens that we are going to the Dale will apply to get back, but yeah, I think that was the arguments were against well, we have this data structure here. Let's use it and use the treasury and put it through the data structure. So that was the arguments for maybe let's go to the future of the Tao in a second, but basically just to kind of close this line of increase. So basically the 50 million they kind of went to park with the understanding that he would they would that they would give them to the well Holland and foundation. Yes, yeah, yeah. So that's the pathway there. And it's also, it's a Julian. So it's a collaboration, so it's a Julian's Julian's first NFT as well. So that's a good thing to spend the money on if Jillian feels like he's going to do other NFTs as.
UK court to rule on Assange bid to prevent US extradition
"Wikileaks wikileaks wikileaks wikileaks founder founder founder founder Julian Julian Julian Julian a a a a song song song song she's she's she's she's battle battle battle battle to to to to avoid avoid avoid avoid extradition extradition extradition extradition to to to to the the the the U. U. U. U. S. S. S. S. we'll we'll we'll we'll go go go go to to to to Britain's Britain's Britain's Britain's Supreme Supreme Supreme Supreme Court Court Court Court after after after after he he he he was was was was granted granted granted granted the the the the right right right right to to to to appeal appeal appeal appeal a a a a lower lower lower lower court court court court ruling ruling ruling ruling the the the High High High Court Court Court last last last month month month overturned overturned overturned a a a lower lower lower court's court's court's decision decision decision saying saying saying the the the US US US promises promises promises well well well enough enough enough to to to guarantee guarantee guarantee a a a song song song she she she will will will be be be treated treated treated humanely humanely humanely in in in a a a US US US prison prison prison now now now the the the court court court has has has given given given the the the wikileaks wikileaks wikileaks founder founder founder permission permission permission to to to appeal appeal appeal that that that ruling ruling ruling to to to the the the Supreme Supreme Supreme Court Court Court decisions decisions decisions the the the latest latest latest step step step in in in a a a song song song his his his long long long battle battle battle to to to avoid avoid avoid a a a trial trial trial on on on a a a series series series of of of charges charges charges related related related to to to wikileaks wikileaks wikileaks publication publication publication of of of classified classified classified documents documents documents more more more than than than a a a decade decade decade ago ago ago Charles Charles Charles Taylor Taylor Taylor this this this month month month London London London wikileaks wikileaks wikileaks founder founder founder Julian Julian Julian a a a song song song she's she's she's battle battle battle to to to avoid avoid avoid extradition extradition extradition to to to the the the U. U. U. S. S. S. we'll we'll we'll go go go to to to Britain's Britain's Britain's Supreme Supreme Supreme Court Court Court after after after
UK court to rule on request to send Assange to US for trial
"A a British British Appalachian Appalachian court court was was open open the the door door for for wikileaks wikileaks Julian Julian assigns assigns to to be be extradited extradited to to the the US US the the court court decision decision overturns overturns a a lower lower court court ruling ruling that that found found a a son son his his mental mental health health was was too too fragile fragile to to withstand withstand the the American American criminal criminal justice justice system system the the U. U. S. S. had had appealed appealed the the ruling ruling challenging challenging the the argument argument lawyer lawyer James James Lewis Lewis saying saying the the wikileaks wikileaks co co founder founder had had no no history history of of serious serious and and enduring enduring mental mental illness illness US US prosecutors prosecutors have have indicted indicted a a song song on on seventeen seventeen espionage espionage charges charges and and one one charge charge of of computer computer misuse misuse the the new new routing routing is is likely likely to to be be appealed appealed Charles Charles Taylor Taylor this this month month London London
"assange" Discussed on TIME's Top Stories
"Representing Assange, Edward Fitzgerald, QC pointed to several revelatory investigations by the press concerning Assange's time in the Ecuadorian embassy. In 2019, Spanish newspaper el pais published evidence that a Spanish security firm tasked with protecting the embassy building had been secretly surveilling Assange, his lawyers and visitors and reporting information to the CIA. Security staff allegedly took samples from a baby's diaper to check whether Assange and Morris were the child's parents. Given the threat of constant surveillance, Assange's psychiatrist, withheld Stella Morris's relationship with Assange for safety reasons, Fitzgerald argued in court. Morris went public as Assange's partner in April 2020. Last month, Yahoo. News published a report that the CIA had plotted to poison abduct or assassinate Assange in 2017. Given the revelations of surveillance in the embassy and plots to kill him Fitzgerald told the court, there are great grounds for fearing what will be done to him if extradited to the U.S.. He urged the court not to trust the assurances of the same government alleged to have plotted Assange's killing. The defense went even further to discredit the assurances made by the U.S. government, calling them conditional and aspirational. Fitzgerald said Australia had not yet agreed to take Assange in if he was convicted, and he predicted Assange would be put in solitary confinement as soon as he arrives in America. What do Assange's supporters say. In a press briefing earlier this week, Morris told reporters that Assange was suffering physically and mentally as a result of the proceedings. I saw Julian in belmarsh prison. He was looking very unwell. I was quite taken aback by how thin he was. Assange's supporters are keen to emphasize the significance of the case on global press freedoms. Addressing the Yahoo news investigation, Kristen hirosan, current editor in chief of WikiLeaks compared the alleged CIA plot to the Saudi assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. The intentions are the same, and the victims are the same. Journalists..
"assange" Discussed on TIME's Top Stories
"Assange's supporters claimed the move was motivated by probes by WikiLeaks into corruption by the Ecuadorian president Lenin Moreno. Moreno has denied the corruption accusations. He also said Assange's asylum was revoked because Assange's behavior was too disruptive. He claimed Assange smeared feces on embassy walls. An allegation the activists lawyers called outrageous. Within hours, police in London arrested Assange in the embassy on a U.S. extradition warrant for an indictment of conspiracy to hack a government computer. He was charged by British courts for breach of bail and in May 2019 was sentenced to 50 weeks in a high security London prison. That same month, the U.S. indicted Assange on 17 further charges under the espionage act, which carry a total maximum sentence of 170 years in prison. Assange has always denied that his actions constitute espionage. After visiting Assange in the British prison in May 2019, the UN special repertoire on torture nils melzer concluded that in addition to physical ailments, mister Assange showed all symptoms typical for prolonged exposure to psychological torture, including extreme stress, chronic anxiety and intense psychological trauma. The British government disagreed with some of those conclusions. The extradition process began in May 2019, but was delayed several times partly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Persuaded by the defense team's arguments that the extradition of Assange would be oppressive due to his risk of suicide, a British judge ruled against the extradition on January 4th this year. The U.S. announced it would appeal the decision, but Assange was denied bail due to the risk he might abscond. What did the U.S. argue in the appeal hearing? On October 27th, the appeal hearing began in the British high court, Assange did not attend due to poor health. His legal team said. He later appeared via a video link from prison. Lawyers representing the U.S. argued that Assange's health issues were not as severe as Assange's legal team had claimed during the initial extradition hearing. James Lewis QC told the court that in the previous proceedings, Assange's psychiatrist had failed to disclose Assange's relationship with Stella Morris, a lawyer originally on his legal team, and the couple's two children who were conceived during Assange's stay in the embassy. Having the responsibility of children lowered Assange's likelihood of suicide. Lewis argued, the U.S. lawyers also pointed to the lower rate of suicides in prisons in the United States compared to the UK and argued that Assange's depression was moderate rather than severe. Lewis emphasized that the U.S. government had worked to mitigate the risks to Assange if extradited having issued four binding assurances concerning his proposed treatment in U.S. custody. These included an agreement to send Assange to his home country of Australia to serve the prison sentence and not incarcerate him in super maximum security prison ADX Florida. They also included an agreement not to subject him to a highly restrictive form of solitary confinement, provided he did not commit another offense. What was Assange's defense Assange's lawyers argued that his risk of suicide remained substantial and defended the psychiatrist's decision not to disclose a song shot a partner and two children..
"assange" Discussed on TIME's Top Stories
"Brought to you by audible. What to know about Julian Assange's extradition appeal by eloise Barry, in London. This week, lawyers for the U.S. government began a legal challenge to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange from the UK to face charges of violating the espionage act. Assange is wanted in the U.S. on 18 criminal charges after WikiLeaks published thousands of secret U.S. Military and diplomatic documents concerning the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in 2010. In a two day hearing in the British high court, the U.S. government appealed a January 4th ruling by a London district judge declining to extradite Assange to the U.S. largely due to the risk he would take his own life in a maximum security prison. Key recent developments, including new assurances about how Assange would be treated by the U.S., were brought before a British judge tasked with reviewing the lower court's ruling and considering whether the risk to Assange's safety had changed. Here's what you need to know about the appeal and the story so far. Who is Julian Assange on what is his website WikiLeaks. Australian cyber activist Assange launched WikiLeaks in 2006. The nonprofit was set up with the aim of exposing state secrets. Its founder argued should be in the public domain. In 2010, U.S. Army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning provided WikiLeaks with hundreds of thousands of highly classified internal documents. The publications included the revelation of what appeared to be war crimes. Footage released in April 2010 showed U.S. soldiers shooting and killing civilians from a helicopter in Iraq. It also included sensitive information about human intelligence sources and surveillance techniques, disclosure of which the U.S. argues put lives at risk. Later that year in November 2010, Swedish authorities issued an arrest warrant for Assange over allegations of rape and other sexual offenses. Assange was working in London at the time and claimed the allegations were fabricated in order to facilitate his extradition from Sweden to the U.S. for publishing the sensitive documents. Facing extradition to Sweden, Assange skipped bail in June 2012 and sought refuge in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Two months later, Ecuador granted him asylum on the grounds of political persecution. He resided in the embassy building for 7 years during which time the Swedish investigation was dropped in 2019. Why does the U.S. want to extradite Assange? In April 2019, after a series of behavioral transgressions, alleged by the Ecuadorian embassy in London, Ecuador revoked his diplomatic asylum..
Assange partner: extradition to US is 'unthinkable'
"The poem the wikileaks founder Julian Assange says the decision to extradite him to the US would be totally unacceptable as U. S. authorities launch a new battle to make a song face American justice Stella Morris spoke outside the court to assign to supporters you can't courts are now faced with this decision about whether they can extradite a journalist in the country that was plotting to kill it would be unthinkable that they would go along with it I hope the justice will be served appealing against an earlier legal decision on attorney for the U. S. government on Wednesday denied the song his mental health was too fragile to withstand the U. S. judicial system Charles the last month London
US set to appeal UK refusal to extradite WikiLeaks' Assange
"The US is asking the Britain's High Court to overturn a judge's decision that Julian a song she should not be sent to America to face espionage charges in January a local judge refused an American request to extradite assault on spying charges a decade ago denying extradition on health grounds and saying the sound was likely to kill himself if held under harsh US prison conditions now an attorney for the U. S. government James Lewis argues that judge was incorrect when she wrote the songs would be a risk of suicide because of any oppressive conditions the authorities also argue a song does not meet the threshold of being so ill that he cannot resist harm himself the hearing is expected to last from four to six weeks Charles Taylor this month
"assange" Discussed on Ron Paul Liberty Report
"Host. And you're good to see you. Good morning dr paul. I'm doing fine. Thank you so we have a few little items here today to go over I'm just wondering always like to look which one is going to be. Really super positive. The war has ended living in peace and prosperity. You can't find one of those but We all report things as we see it Wanna start off with talking about one of my least favorite Former head of the cia. I think that name is palm peyot or something like that. We spent a little bit of time. Congress together as i recall but i didn't get to know them. I had no. But i'm not surprised that i wasn't very Strong supporter of him when he was in the cia and he is furious. He's furious yahu. I think it was the can't came out with with a report that during the trump administration and with with pompeu at cia. They made attempts to eat her kidnapper even assassinate Assange and I Refresh my memory on this and you know he was. He was indicted during the trump administration. You know and that would have had to do with with pompeii. Oh and others. so anyway. the The story got out and made they people unhappy and i thought you know at first i thought was dude. This thing is horrible. Because i had remember him saying something about assange being mistreated so So i don't know what trump opinion was but we do know.
Ecuadorian court revokes citizenship for Julian Assange
"Hi Mike Rossi are reporting an Ecuadorean court revokes the citizenship for Juliana Sasha Ecuador has revoked the citizenship of wikileaks founder Julian Assange he received Ecuadorian citizenship in January twenty eighteen as part of a failed attempt to make him a diplomat to get him out of the Ecuadorian embassy in London Sandra native of Australia spent seven years inside the embassy trying to avoid extradition to Sweden to face allegations of rape and sexual assault the song has been held in London's high security Belmarsh prison since April twenty nineteen after being arrested for skipping bail seven years earlier in a separate case Saanjh is under indictment in the US on espionage charges related to wikileaks publication of thousands of leaked military and diplomatic documents hi Mike Rossio
UK Court Allows US to Appeal Denial of Assange's Extradition
"Britain's High Court who's going to do the U. S. government permission to appeal the decision the wikileaks founder Julian Assange cannot be sent to the U. S. to face espionage charges the judicial office says the appeal had been granted and the case would be listed for a High Court hearing although no dates being set so far the judge ordered the song she must remain in prison during any potential U. S. appeal as he has an incentive to abscond if you were freed in January a local judge had refused an American request to send the song to the U. S. the district judge had denied extradition on health grounds saying the signage was likely to kill himself if held under harsh US prison conditions Charles the last month London
"assange" Discussed on Republic Keeper - with Brian O'Kelly
"I just wanted to give the disclaimer as her by john and armenia are in a conflict in that conflict. Azerbaijan is powered and fuelled by turkey and russia. Both who want to see armenia taken over by those people and into their sphere of influence and the armenian genocide is a real thing and joe biden was right to recognize it and this man the i just played the video of maybe a guy carrying out similar things so i don't wanna give the idea that he's a good guy. I don't think. I suspect he's not and i but i don't know okay so i just want to give the disclaimer there but but the reality is that what he's exposing here is something that is absolutely true. And that is that. The west has a political prisoner named julian. Assange and the west the bastion of freedom has a man in prison. Four for doing what. I'm doing now for doing what cole did a little bit ago for saying. Hey here's a story. Let me report on it. That's what julian assange is imprisoned for. He's in prison for the same thing. The pentagon papers did guys. Did they got some some secret documents. That were going to go to the press anyway and they went ahead and release them and the the supreme court determined. It's not illegal. And this is the reason why i want to tell you this. This is a political thing. And i'm disappointed that trump didn't pardon him because the reality is that julian assange the.
"assange" Discussed on Republic Keeper - with Brian O'Kelly
"Full court press on the elimination of women and this is an attack on women's attack on our wives and daughters and it's attack on on femininity. And we gotta stop it. We got to stand in the way of it. Be right back. You're listening to republic keeper and now republic keeper with brian. Okay already so. Welcome back to the republican broadcast. Thanks again for your time and attention today. i'm so grateful for it and looks like Look at this get the microphone. Turn the right way and actually speak into it. That actually makes kohl's job. I think you actually can. He's like. I didn't understand why i had to turn you wake up and i still couldn't get anything. Yeah well because you know you're the smart one. So i have you here to run the stuff so next time you have that trouble you just say hey dummy. Did you move your arm anyway. Welcome back to the republic for broadcast. Those who are new to the show this works is you can tell. There's no big professional company behind this. It's it's you and i. We do it together. Listener slash viewers puerto broadcasting. And so i need your help. And the help i need is with is with three. Simple things number one Please remember to pray for me. And a pray for coal and upriver for our effort here and that it would be successful valuable and that we need energy and insight and wisdom and some technical skills and and more to pull this off. So keep praying for us. If you'd be so kind of i'm grateful for that and the second thing is i find that Follow and like in share button. And because that's the way the thing grows a you know we can't buy Enough advertising to compensate for the way facebook and some of these others would suppress content. But the army of you were time. He gets hit the share button whether it's on the main show or the clips we share and we're putting more clips up now. The last couple of days have been a couple in there. Be more going forward So really important that you do that. And then the last thing is the show needs little money run and so.
"assange" Discussed on Republic Keeper - with Brian O'Kelly
"Stand on the shoulders of giants. The jason is one of the giants. I shoulder as i stand on. The actually does his own reporting and so here is a hit. He did on tucker carlson I believe last night I'm sure it was last night on the situation here in washington state in seattle. He joins us tonight to explain what exactly they're doing. Jason thanks for coming on. what are they doing. Yes so governor. Inslee just released some guidance allowing vaccinated only sections so vaccination segregations at outdoor stadiums at graduation ceremonies for schools. Even your church so now we get some of your freedoms back to pray in vaccinated only sections. Now you still have to wear a mask outside surrounded by people who are vaccinated which obviously makes no sense. You get a separate entrance to go into some of these sections but you have to show your vaccine paperwork. You literally have to show than a vaccine passport to gain entrance into the sections so you have to prove that you've been vaccinated. You have to show your medical paperwork your medical history so no longer. Are we talking about your privacy. No longer by the way. Are we talking about ideas being racist or equity concerning access to the vaccine. You actually have to show this information. Some people are saying look. This is not the same thing is coercion. this is all optional. However to go to washington state university or the university of washington students have to get vaccinated. It is a mandate the staff at the university of washington. Do not but the staff do so. We're talking about college. Age students many of whom have already had cove it who have literally the anybody's going through their system as we speak have to get a vaccine and they have no choice if they want to go back to campus. That is the state doing. May i ask the question. There is evidence and compelling evidence talk to physicians who treat covid. Who will tell you that people who have active anybody's t. Cells are protected who recovered from covid. Have more protection against the virus than people who've been vaccinated but they still have to get the is not adequate to show proof of anybody's know every single person if you want to go onto campus as a student you will have to get a vaccine. And i've asked questions as to why the more vulnerable folks like the staff members who are in that age demographic of sixty plus don't have to at some of these schools. They won't give me an answer right. They don't give answers to any questions. Like have you been vaccinated. What do you care if other people have been but no one answers that either jason. Great to see you thank you. Thanks tucker and i think the question Tucker asked there is so right on my mind. If you've been vaccinated do you care. Is anyone else has been. Because after all he's been vaccinated. So why does it matter to you and you know because literally. You can't get it right if you've been vaccinated care about them. Vaccinated than if the vaccine is effective than. What does it matter. If other people haven't i mean to you great that you're a good humanitarian and all that one you know care about people and so on so forth but tucker's point. What does it matter. And if they're going to enforce this for students why aren't they enforcing it the faculty why aren't they enforcing it for every visitor to campus are the enforcing it for every older person who comes to visit on a visit their kids day. You know and so you know the the lack of any kind of i don't know consistency. And this is part of what is so bothersome. Everybody right the whole You know virus policy from the beginning to end is one of these things that people are just kind of over and so much so that if we If you take a look at it. There's these frustrated parents who saw the other day. And i don't remember what state that was a thing the other day some parents shut down the school board and took it over. Well here it is happening again. This in utah now. Some frustrated herbs shut down the school board. This is i think yesterday. But here's the clip tastes. I'm out second. Take in favor a boy..
Substack Newsletters Are Unbundling the News Industry
"Week there was a A twitter thread by a professor named sarah roberts who is the co leader and co founder of the ucla center for critical internet inquiry. Who stated goal is quote strengthening democracy through culture making and she went on this tirade about sub stack. Which is obviously where i you know. I work you're gonna work and the threat is kind of amazing. And it's it's the reason. I think it's worth talking about is because this is becoming a thing now There have been a number of features in places like the new yorker and and the new york times wrote about some And there's this increasing like Message that sub stack is like. It's not just annoying but it's dangerous. And so she. She wrote a series of tweets. The first one says some is a dangerous direct threat to traditional news media of more importantly it's threat to journalism. And here's the argument. Journalists make their name doing reporting This is governed by norms and practices in ethics flawed and not always achieve true but president and guiding. What newsrooms do in every way. Yes people not inside. Journalism or media may not know the specifics but they often have a nebulous sense that there are norms independence disclosure of compromise editorial oversight and vetting of the reporting. That's what makes them trust enough to buy or read or watch. What's less obvious is when there is a reporter who makes her name in the newsroom. Traditional paper or fully online outlet then leased for subject or any analog taking that name reputation earned from work done in the context. I just stated in this way and investigative reporter who has earned her bona fide in a newsroom and underbush strict editorial and journalistic principles has just cashed out and turned herself into an opinion writer. She likes it because she's finally got her independence from an editor. Please do not writer or pay sub stack. I have to say it. I believe it's dangerous. Take keyed you read it here. I
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange denied bail by London court
"Judge has denied bail to wikileaks. Founder julian assange who has been jailed in britain since twenty nine as he fights extradition to the united states ordering him to remain in prison while the courts consider an appeal by us authorities against a decision to not extradite him on monday. The judge rejected the request. Sentence on should the us face espionage charges on health
U.K. judge denies Julian Assange's request for release on bail
"A judge has rejected wikileaks founder. Julian assange is bid to be released from prison as he fights. Us extradition attempts on espionage charges assange has been held at london's high-security belmarsh prison since april of twenty nineteen arrested for skipping. Bail on a separate legal battle two days ago. A judge denied the. Us request send assange to the us to face those charges for publishing secret military documents a decade ago. The us says it will appeal that decision. North
WikiLeaks founder Assange denied bail in UK
"A British judge, denying bail to Wikileaks founder Julian Asan, who has been jailed in Britain since 2019 as he fights extradition to the US, the judge ordering a sandwich to remain behind bars. The courts consider an appeal by U. S authorities against the decision not to
Microsoft Solar Winds Breach, Slack Outage, Assange Denied Extradition, Singapore Police Use Contact Tracing Data
"Microsoft source code accessed by solarmax attackers as part of its ongoing investigation into the solar wind supply chain attack. Microsoft discovered it systems were infiltrated beyond just the presence of militia code with the attackers able to view source code in a number of repositories while able to view the code. The attackers did not gain permission to modify any code or systems. The company said it did not see any production systems or customer data access or found any indication. It systems were used to attack. Other organizations slack suffers a massive outage. Looks like slack head a case of the mondays because the team messaging service was down for several hours on january. Fourth uses began reporting issues around ten am eastern with slack. Managing the issues on its support page around ten fourteen. Am saying the issues connecting to the service and messaging but classifying it as a full blown outage around eleven. Twenty am by one pm slack. Support advise that users should be able to reconnect with degraded performance but that counter integrations and email notifications for. Dm's we're still having issues. Slack did not specify the reason for the outage. uk judge denies assange extradition to the us. The judge ruled that wikileaks founder. Julian assange cannot be extradited to the united states to face trial on charges for violating the espionage act. the judge ruled that extradition would be unjust and oppressive. Setting assange is mental. Health would put them at extreme risk of suicide if extradited to the us the judge rejected assange s defence however that the charges weren't attack on press freedom and politically motivated saying the. Us brought the case in good faith in two thousand nineteen asandra charged with seventeen counts of violating the espionage act resulting from the publication of documents provided by former us army intelligence analyst chelsea manning. Singapore police can use contact tracing data in criminal investigations. Singapore's minister of state for home affairs desmond tan confirmed that law enforcement can use data from the country's trace together contact tracing app and wearable token as part of the country criminal procedure code. When the app token were introduced the government said data would never be accessed unless there was a positive test insisting token was not a tracking device and that all data would be encrypted for twenty five days before being automatically deleted tan also said that misuse of contact tracing data by unauthorized users was still subject to fines and up to two years in jail
UK judge refuses extradition of WikiLeaks founder Assange
"Uk judge vanessa. Barrett sir westminster magistrates. Courts ruled that wikileaks founder. Julian assange cannot be extradited to the united states to face trial. On charges of violating the espionage act the judge ruled that extradition would be unjust and oppressive citing that assange is mental. Health would put him at extreme risk of suicide if extradited to the us the judge rejected us on just defense at the charges. Were an attack on press freedom seeing that the brought the case in good faith in two thousand nineteen assange was charged with seventeen counts of violating the espionage act resulting from the publication of documents provided by former us army intelligence analyst chelsea. Manning
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's extradition to US denied by British judge
"Judge in London today ruled against the extradition of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange Onge to the U. S. He's been indicted on charges of violating the Espionage Act. The judge said the risk of suicide if a Sanchez extradited is too high. The verdict was a surprise. It prompted a huge cheer among Assan just supporters outside the Old Bailey, the Central Criminal Court. The judge's verdict says that Julian Assange will not be extradited to the United States to stand trial on mental health grounds. She says that he's the past is despairing on that conditions in U. S jails, which she described as oppressive could make him a serious suicide risk that CBS correspondent Elizabeth Palmer
UK judge refuses extradition of WikiLeaks founder Assange
"Uk judge vanessa. Barrister of westminster's magistrate's court ruled that wikileaks founder. Julian assange can not extradited to the united states to face trial on charges of violating the espionage. Act the judge ruled. The extradition would be unjust and oppressive setting assange mental health extreme risk of suicide if extradited to the us. The judge rejected assange defense that the charges were an attack on press freedom however saying that the us brought the case in good faith in two thousand nineteen asandra is charged with seventeen counts of violating the espionage act resulting from the publication of documents provided by former us army intelligence analyst chelsea manning
UK judge refuses extradition of WikiLeaks founder Assange
"A British judge has rejected an American request to extradite wikileaks founder Julian assigns to face espionage charges saying he's likely to kill himself if held under harsh prison conditions in a ruling a district judge rejects allegations the song is being prosecuted for political reasons or not receive a fair trial in the US but argues his mental condition is such that it would be oppressive to extradite him to the US the judge adds his precarious health would likely deteriorate further under the conditions of what she calls me up total isolation he would face in a US prison her assessment is that the song is depressed and sometimes despairing man but one which could circumvent any suicide prevention measures taken by the American prison authorities Charles the last month London
U.K. judge rejects U.S. request to extradite WikiLeaks' Julian Assange
"Rules on extraditing Wikileaks founder Julian Massage to the U. S Judge has just ruled that Julian Assange cannot be extradited to the U. S because of fear. Is that the wiki leaks founder may commit suicide. US prosecutors expected to appeal today's ruling yes, reporter Vicki Barker says Massage faces espionage charges for posting a leaked U. S military and diplomatic documents. He spent years an asylum of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. Atlanta police
Julian Assange Faces Ruling on Extradition to U.S.
"Will rule today on whether the Wikileaks founder Julian Assange large, could be extradited to the United States to face charges relating to the disclosure of thousands of secret military documents. The U. S claims the leaks broke the law and endangered lives. Mr. Assange's supporters say they revealed evidence of war crimes.
"assange" Discussed on Stuff They Don't Want You To Know Audio
"Here's where it gets crazy. What's happening out? Well it turns out that conspiracy to expose conspiracies has not worked out especially well for Julian assange. Yes you'll recall. How we sat assange was sentenced to fifty weeks in jail Well he was due to be released. In September of two thousand nineteen. The twenty second specifically win is jail term for breaching that bail Ended and they just didn't let them help the Westminster Magistrate's Court noted that there were substantial grounds for believing if free assange would make another run attempting to gain safe status or like Edward Snowden. Make it to a country that would not extradite him to the United States. I mean it's sort of. It's the same way a court assesses anyone's risk of flight. You know they won't grants you bail or they'll make your bail excessively high if they or if they even think that you're GonNa let alone if you've got a established pattern of doing that. Which assange absolutely had so. Julian assange remains in the Belmarsh prison in the United Kingdom his partner lawyer Stella Morris who he has two children with recently said quote the life of my partner. Julian assange severely at risk. He is on demand at H. M. P. Belmarsh and covid nineteen spreading within its walls. So this is a absolutely topical here More sees more than just a San's assange personal health in jeopardy here Saying that quote Julia needs to be released now for him for our family and for the Society. We all want our children to grow up in. Yes okay yeah I mean it depends on what what your take is on on that particular vision of society that assange espouses you know and again I mean a big part of his character is the idea of like free speech about taking powerful people to task but he is absolutely Has Been and remains a super divisive figure So let's talk about a bigger picture issue here that we've addressed A little bit in some of our covid nineteen updates the risk of corona virus in prisons. We add. It's certainly a harry situation for anyone who is being kept anywhere within fairly close quarters to other human beings especially if there are any kind of sanitary issues within. Let's say a prison like that In a in prisons across the world people are being infected with coronavirus because it only takes one person to enter that closed system at some point to then in fact one other in then exponentially grow that outbreak. But in this particular prison impeach Belmarsh were Julian. Assange is at least two people within the prison have contracted covid nineteen or have contracted the coronavirus and are dealing with symptoms of Covid nineteen and prisons. Just in general are pretty rough places to be with individuals who have attributes and possibly charges pending against them for various things of varying severity and in these uncertain times there are higher than average odds of things like violence occurring within prisons. Where there's that kind of fear of something like corona virus or uprisings or maybe even riots very violent riots occurring within these prisons. Yeah yeah that's absolutely correct. In fact there are numerous reports already of riots about prison conditions in the US and abroad and in some countries prisoners have even successfully taken guards hostage not even necessarily to say. Hey we're throwing down the prison walls Let let my people go but more to say we need to bring attention to the pandemic bloodbath that may occur when we are locked in here like animals for whatever reason so this this prison angle has has a lot of fairly plausible conspiratorial aspects to it. Because you know we've seen the the kind of manufactured concerns that pop up in other celebrity prison stories. So what has a high paid lawyer like working for? Weinstein or something. Who says you know? He's very fragile therefore even though he's been convicted of these crimes he should get some sort of special treatment because it's the humane thing to do By the way for our and be fans are Kelly is looking for the same thing. The argument being that he has diabetes and covert is a blow through prison systems. But in assange case there solid evidence that his life may be at risk more so than a Weinstein more so than in our Kelly. Because not as much as a at Jeffrey steen not as much as an Epstein Right. We should call that we should make the Epstein scale. If you know a fellow conspiracy realist. If you have the time in the inclination please feel free to make an info graphic of the Epstein scale the likelihood of died in prison. You Know I. I just really quickly. This is a very interesting thing to think about because the reason Julian assange is in jail. You know is officially because of jumping bail but really when you put all of the math together. It's because he had Damning evidence against very powerful people right or he was able to release information about powerful people in the actions. They take that. Then you think about somebody like Jeffrey Epstein that likely allegedly had the worst kind of evidence against extremely powerful people and we saw what happened to him. You know who knows if it was like we can't prove to you if it was self inflicted or not self inflicted in his case but he was only in prison for a short time. That's all I would say right. Yeah it's very much worth pointing out that plenty of powerful people once this guy dead Even if they can't kill wikileaks which is also on the wishlist. We should note that You know the trump administration is currently attempting to extradite. Assange to the US however remember. We're we're very quickly going into the no real good morally grey territory because the desire to gain possession of assange transcends the growing stark ideological divide in domestic US politics establishment. Democrats want the guy under the jail or under the daisies as much as establishment Republicans. He has very few friends in Congress. You know what I mean and it's it's kind of misleading. That's why I appreciate the point. You made earlier about people liking hero or calling someone a hero until their principles. Whatever they may be run counter to our own principles idea of one person's freedom fighter is another person's terrorist. It all depends on what side of the issue. You fall a lot of times. You know what I mean. Certainly both sides can be guilty of What would be considered a negative acts or even atrocities but still in terms of the way you view The means justifying the ends. You could probably say well they might have done some bad things but they were no ultimately supporting what I think is a just cause and and we should point out in a in a no way baby but kind of moment. Let me tell you what really happened. the US is still of in damage control over this and has been since two thousand and six for more than a decade been damaged control here in the states. Uncle Sam says assange is not wanted because he caught the. Us doing so bad things red-handed or because he damaged the soft power of the reputation abroad or because he embarrassed the US. They say he's wanted. Because he illegally endangered the lives of Informants Aka spies or assets dissidents Aka also possibly Speiser assets. But maybe you know maybe sincere dissidents as well as activist Aka Speiser assets maybe maybe activists in multiple countries including of course Iraq Iran and Afghanistan. So what why what gives what. What is he actually going to be charged with or indicted for we know? Yeah there is an indictment impending charges standing against Julian assange from the United States. And I I'm going to boil it down to you. In the way that Jennifer Robinson explained it in a recent conversation with Glenn Greenwald she. She's a human rights attorney and she's representing assange and she explains it that the the charges essentially state that assange was communicating had communications of some sort with Chelsea manning at the time known as Bradley Manning and that assange disgust with Chelsea ways in which he could access highly classified materials in a way. That would protect your identity. That's really what it's saying. That's the whole thing. Assange was was in connection with Chelsea Manning and Chelsea manning got the materials to him and then he released them in also according to Jennifer. There's a widely held misconception. That's just kind of been floating around and it started from this department of Justice press release. That came out not that long ago and within this release it falsely stated at least according to Robinson that assange was being charged with quote hacking so in some way using a computer or a system to access classified government materials and then get those four Chelsea or with Chelsea Manning because we we discuss Chelsea manning is the person who ended up getting a lot of that documentation that became the Iraq war logs. And the tapes. So just the last thing here is that according to Jennifer Robinson. Within that indictment there is no allegation that assange attempted to hack the government In any way to get to gain material there's also no allegation within that indictment that he unlawfully accessed any government computers or systems whatsoever. That's just just to put it out there in conclusion. The the charges are that he had a discussion with Chelsea manning about how to hide her identity while accessing secret documents. Okay and then once Once that kind of stuff proceeds if it does indeed proceed then we'll see those kind of charges. Become increasingly specific as prosecutors explore explore their options. So this naturally leads us to the next part of the update. Which is this. What's on the horizon. We'll explore that afterward from our sponsors. We've returned so.
"assange" Discussed on Stuff They Don't Want You To Know Audio
"Here's where it gets crazy. What's happening out well? It turns out that conspiracy to expose conspiracies has not worked out especially well for Julian, assange. Yes, you'll recall how we sat. ASSANGE was sentenced to fifty weeks in jail. well, he was due to be released in September of two thousand, nineteen. The twenty second specifically win is jail term for breaching that bail. Ended and they just didn't let them help. The Westminster Magistrate's Court. Noted that there were substantial grounds for believing if free assange would make another run attempting to gain safe status. Or like Edward Snowden. Make it to a country that would not extradite him to the United. States I mean it's sort of. It's the same way a court assesses anyone's risk of flight. You know they won't grants you bail, or they'll make your bail excessively high if they or if they even think that you're gonNA. Let alone if you've got a established pattern of doing that. which assange absolutely had so Julian assange remains in the Belmarsh prison in the United Kingdom his partner lawyer Stella Morris who he has two children with recently, said quote, the life of my partner Julian assange severely at risk. He is on remand at H.. M., p., Belmarsh and covid nineteen. Spreading within its walls, so this is a absolutely topical. More sees more than just a San's assange personal health. In jeopardy here! saying that quote Julia needs to be released now for him for our family and for the society. We all want our children to grow up in. Yes, okay. Yeah, I mean it depends on. What what your take is on on that particular vision of society that assange espouses you know and again I mean a big part of his character is the idea of like free speech about taking powerful people to task, but he is absolutely has been and remains a super divisive figure so let's talk about a bigger picture issue here that we've addressed a little bit in some of our covid nineteen updates the risk of corona virus in prisons we add. It's certainly a harry situation for anyone who is being kept anywhere within. Within fairly close quarters to other human beings, especially if there are any kind of sanitary issues within, let's say a prison like that. in a in prisons across the world, people are being infected with coronavirus, because it only takes one person to enter that closed system at some point to then, in fact, one other in then exponentially grow that outbreak, but in this particular prison hp Belmarsh were Julian assange is at least two people within the prison have contracted Covid, nineteen or have contracted the coronavirus, and are dealing with symptoms of Covid nineteen. And prisons just in general are pretty rough places to be with individuals who? Have, attributes and possibly charges pending against them for very. Varying severity and in these uncertain times there are higher than average odds of things like violence occurring within prisons where there's that kind of fear of something like corona, virus or uprisings, or maybe even riots very violent riots occurring within these prisons. Yeah, yeah, that's absolutely correct. In fact, there are numerous reports already of riots about prison conditions. In the US and abroad, and in some countries, prisoners have even successfully taken guards hostage, not even necessarily to say hey, we're throwing down the prison walls Let let my people go, but more to say. We need to bring attention to the pandemic bloodbath. That may occur when we are locked in here like animals for whatever reason. So, This this prison angle. Has has a lot of fairly plausible conspiratorial aspects to it because you know, we've seen the the kind of manufactured concerns that pop up in other celebrity prison stories, so what has a high paid lawyer like working for Weinstein or something? Who says you know? He's very fragile therefore. Even, though he's been convicted of these crimes, he should get some sort of special treatment. Because it's the humane thing to do. by the way for our and be fans are Kelly is. Looking for the same thing, the argument being that he has diabetes and covert is a blow through prison systems, but in assange case there solid evidence that his life. Be At risk more so than a Weinstein more so than in our Kelly, because not as much as A. At Jeffrey Dean Not as much as an Epstein right. We should call that. We should make the Epstein scale if you know a fellow conspiracy realist. If you have the time in the inclination, please feel free to make an info graphic of the Epstein scale. The likelihood of died in prison. You know I. I just really quickly. This is a very interesting thing to think about because the reason Julian, assange is in jail. You know is officially because of jumping bail, but really when you put all of the math together, it's because he had damning evidence against very powerful people right, or he was able to release information about powerful people in the actions. They take that then you think about somebody like Jeffrey. Jeffrey Epstein that likely at allegedly had the worst kind of evidence against extremely powerful people and we saw what happened to him. You know who knows if it was like we can't prove to you if it was self inflicted or not self inflicted in his case, but he was only in prison for a short time. That's all I would say right. Yeah, it's very much worth pointing out that plenty of powerful people once. This guy dead even if they can't kill wikileaks, which is also on the wishlist. We should note that you know. The trump administration is currently attempting to extradite Assange to the US however. Remember we're. We're very quickly. Going into the no real good, morally grey territory, because the desire to gain possession of assange transcends the growing stark ideological divide in domestic US politics, Establishment Democrats want the guy under the jail, or under the daisies as much as establishment Republicans. He has very few friends in Congress. You know what I mean and it's. It's kind of misleading..
"assange" Discussed on Stuff They Don't Want You To Know Audio
"WIKILEAKS DOT ORG website. Just if you're curious or you know, you're feeling a little dangerous. You can go check. Yeah, yeah, we should say benefit of talking about these past leaks is that they are all available? You know what I mean. It reminds me of the streisand effect. You guys know what that is right. Now so, the streisand effect is essentially saying that. Once, something is out there. Has Published Online. especially a cannot be removed. No matter how much someone wants it to be removed. It's named after a picture of Barbara streisand I believe that she asked to be removed from the Internet. And you know we all are familiar with the denizens of the Internet that is the same thing is telling them. Please pretty. Please spread this everywhere. Yeah it was were Malibu home. As of two thousand and three I believe that she was attempting to remove. That's right, and you could see the argument there because it's like. Hey, this is you know my personal dwelling place, but this situation reminds me of something very funny. I don't know if I mentioned it to guys when the wikileaks stuff really started hitting, but there were internal emails throughout. Throughout the intelligence industry, which is the right word and throughout the defense industry where people were literally telling government employees. Hey, we know this is out there. It's on the news. It's online just so you know you will get in trouble if you read it unless you have the correct classification and that was such an attempt to close the barn door after the horses of stampeded away. We just didn't have legislation for this, and that's part of why. Iraq the world so fundamentally, and that's not even we're not even talking about twenty sixteen right, but the emails because later wikileaks released some twenty thousand pages of e mails from the Hillary Clinton campaign. Is your call. Former secretary of State Clinton was running for President in two thousand, sixteen and also emails from the Democratic National. Committee it is again, not hyperbole to say that these altered the course of US politics in a big big way. Yeah, it's true I mean the emails which later became part of the Internet catchphrase but her emails explored and expanded expanded on Multiple Clinton controversies. Controversies that already been out there in the public imagination in we'd we discuss some of those early on in the campaign between Hillary, Clinton and Donald Trump where we did trump, you know the most popular trump and Clinton conspiracy theories and the Clinton conspiracy theories are massive, because they involve both her and her husband, and the questionable relationship between the Clinton Foundation and its donors Clinton's. Kind of you know. Close Knit relationships shall we say with some very powerful Wall Street interests that became problematic, especially, considering that she kind of you know was trying to cast herself as sort of the people's candidate and her incredibly close ties with a very wealthy and powerful campaign contributors This is just beginning to scratch the surface, but it's fair to say that the Leagues Played A. A huge role in the outcome of that year's presidential election and it also you know I. Think a lot of people look at assange early on as sort of this great equalizer you know in trying to take powerful people to task, and that's all well and good, if the outcome is on your side right, and so I think he really became a hugely divisive figure. On the left when this happened, and it started to feel like he was perhaps more interested in getting the other side elected, and that became very confusing of his character, really kind of complicated the relationship with the public and Julian. Assange I would say two things here. I recently listened to Glenn Greenwald now of the intercept. That's how he's best known currently but. Journalists who is discussing? How, Julian assange really does represent a largely hated figure on both the political left and right within the United States. Because of the people who would consider him anti war or anti. You know military because of the Iraq, war logs and other things in the diplomatic cables. They very much dislike him from that angle, and then from this like he said in the people in political left very much dislike him because they essentially blame him for Hillary Clinton losing the election. One commonality that we've seen through these leaks is that it is attempting at least feels that it's an attempt to show that behind the curtain scene of the powerful people in every single one of these that we just we've already kind of mentioned here. And I guess when you are doing that. In showing a peek behind the curtain of all powerful people you're. GonNa. PISS everybody off Yeah agreed very much. So and you know I wanna ask you guys hear A. Just, an opinion you know. Do Are you all of the opinion that this that this did significantly impact the election or was it? I mean. How much do you think it swung the needle? I would say it swung the needle. I mean my opinion is a Yes for sure it did. Because it changed the conversation that was happening on the news cycle almost like right up into the election. Right up until the day of the election. It really did change what people were talking about. Oh I think that's. There's no question about it. Absolutely hijacked the conversation in a way. That Clinton was just not able to put back in that Pandora's box. You know and it really completely took away her power to kind of steer the narrative. which you know, say what you will about what whichever side of policy politics that you you fall on She definitely was trying very hard to cast herself. In this light of being kind of the People's candidate of being this sort of you know even handed person that wasn't connected to any kind of wrongdoing. And that she really cared about the every man for lack of a better term, and this really kind of shattered a lot of that, and it made it it leaves whether it was true or not at least the contents of the emails and the nature of the whole private server situation, and whether or not she completely flaunt flouted the rules, and just went her own way. It really robbed her of the ability and her campaign of the ability to steer that narrative, and it was just impossible to spin it at that point. Yeah, it's the old. The old saying holds true if you are defending yourself in any kind of political sphere than you are automatically losing. The fascist were right about it the the Republicans and the Democrats were right about it. It's just sort of the part of the Part of the house rules of these terrible terrible games, but there you have it. Here's the takeaway. Single man, flesh and blood, just as many of the people listening to this show today are. Unelected himself was able to shake the world. You can understand why so many powerful people consider him dangerous. When we last left Julian Assange, he had been removed from the Ecuadorian Embassy. All indications appeared that he would continue on a legal battle at a glacial pace, likely from prison, as he sought to avoid extradition, and probably in his mind possible death in the United States so where are we at now will answer the question after a word from our sponsors. iheartradio and the US Census Bureau wanted to do something special for the class of twenty twenty, so we made commencement a new podcast with words of inspiration from the biggest names.
"assange" Discussed on Reasonable Doubt
"Gary, I keep meaning to reach out to and talk to him about it because I think he would love to spend thirty minutes or twenty minutes talking to Lynn just the, the kinds of cases, he takes and, and he's, he's just a solid guy. But he has I thought I just saw something this week that he posted. I read that was a court order overruling one of his motion. One of the motions to dismiss in response to his case. So I think he's got some winded is back. I doubt they settle but it's an interesting time for media outlets. I mean, the, the Julian Assange indictment that came out today. We're taping this on Friday that parts of it were revealed today are an interesting. Movement towards area that we didn't go before, you know, during the Obama 's tenure, there were people tend to forget this, but there were subpoenas of reporters phone records, and they kept trying to find out who was leaking information to reporters, and so that was something that was started them, but they stop just short of, of the specific prosecution Assange is now, they're, they're pushing nine envelope from where they were previously, because whatever you say about him, the activity they're saying, basically that what he did is when he revealed the classified information he put people's lives at risk. I was reading something today were some media outlets were saying that's what they always argue or not yet, that's above my pay grade. But it's, it's a very close, call between the first amendment and the classified info. Permission Protection Act CPA, and so that it'll be very interesting to see how he and I'm sure he will fight it on the first amendment grounds. Just a small, let. What interesting on their interesting ruling? So it's been to my mind misinterpreted but we'll see how plays out the what I what the court did was the court said, we're going to the court file. When you get your case dismissed by virtue of the, the mechanism that the state's attorney dismissed it then would seal the court file this was an unsealing of the court file based on his statements and attorney statements after the fact was mind, but it was one of I mentioned the order, but I would assume it would be the press conference was held outside the court arguing or the court ruling that, that, that would allow for the court file to be unsealed. I, I think that the there's going to be much do about nothing but we'll see. Because I don't think that the court. File has got green jury material in it. I don't think the court file would have any other things in it normally court file would have court documents meaning there would be bale information, there would be things, the nature of orders as to where you could go what you could do your movement, so to speak on bail. There would be entries as to the indictment, probably there would probably be the criminal complaint and things like that. So absence that I think it's a story without a whole lot of substance..
"assange" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show
"The same guy who will bomber tried to ice out. And who Trump kept on? It's one of the one guy didn't get rid of three of them. He's one of them at a forty seven fired US attorneys. He's not on that list. He's there the whole time. If anybody knows it's point if anybody knows the Russians didn't do it or didn't give it to WikiLeaks. I'm not suggesting the Russians are friends may or WikiLeaks for that matter. I'm simply suggesting to you that I do facts and anybody knows it's Wednesday. Now. Tracy Darty McCormack was acting. They then this this is so crazy. It's going to bake your bagels. I promise again. I just wanna make sure heavy hat tip, the Tracy beans, and my buddy two seven nine because I really there are people out there doing unbelievable workout there when Tracy Darty McCormack who takes over signs the indictment. Assange leaves the position just a little bit later. She's acting in there and investigation. I believe was led by day's theme. Who takes over for her? Zack Willer coup. The heck is that might as well said inspector gadget who the heck is actor Willer. Zach two Wheeler is the son of George to wilder. Okay. Again, who the heck is the sequel or two? The flying villagers circuit. George will occur. Ladies and gentlemen, was the deputy attorney general of one William bar. Yes. Your attorney general now remember bars been the attorney general twice. The deuce. So the attorney the deputy attorney general for William barn is price of George to wilder a guy. He trusts a guy in public speeches in that position talking about the deputy attorney general bars acknowledged how important that position is he appoints his son or his son gets appointed excuse me, George to wilder to that position. In the eastern district of Virginia where they're looking into the whole Assange case. Folks who else did to Wella workforce.
"assange" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show
"Let's get right to it. Ladies and gentlemen. What is going on with the Julian Assange case, and what is going on with Dana Puente. Now, this is going to be a little complicated. But I s sure you this is worth your time. So let me just give you the lead. First. If we had the Dan Bongino post headline it is going to be the timing of the Julian Assange arrest who I think was involved in the investigation of Assange. This is the founder of WikiLeaks. Of course. So the timing of the arrests is very suspicious and who was involved in the investigation, specifically Dana Wednesday, and others is just fascinating. Let's get to the curious case of Dana point day. I now I have to ask you some hat tips before we start I want it from the bottom of my heart. Thank people like Chuck Ross, Jeff Carlson in this specific case, my buddy. He will call them to seven nine I want to thank Tracy beans. I want to thank all of the journalists out there on Twitter that did the real investigative work on spy gate while the media sat in a corner with their dunce caps on this. Specifically, I want to have to Tracy B's who's been all over this from the beginning. And my buddy, let's call them to seventy nine sources of minded, but working on this for a long time. Ladies and gentlemen, let's us tablets, some facts. I the entire crux of this debate this fee Lasko the scandal by gay drama. Okay. Let's just be clear. So we understand we're going was that the Russians worked in conjunction with WikiLeaks. Julian Assange group who was holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy was recently arrested that Russia worked with WikiLeaks and Assange to get the DNC emails were hacked out there and that WikiLeaks and the Russians worked in conjunction with the Trump campaign. Do you understand that that makes sense if that doesn't make sense none of this will make an hour? Good. So to be clear on this. All right, Joe. I'm relying on YouTube. If Assange who had not been arrested up until this point has evidence that they did not in fact, get.
"assange" Discussed on KTAR 92.3FM
"Voice to America, the global touch show. Now back to Tony for me to Mark out of France for joining us in the first segment Wicky arrest. Assange is snatched we will find out if he comes the United States Mark seems to think his first stop will mostly be Sweden might be his last stop. We'll get a perspective in more from what is being said on by global media and the changes heart segment coming up in about thirty five minutes, our next stop will be in London. We're going to talk to a first time voice about the latest move by the British government to create a online harm czar position. This is one of these we had the drug czar Z, and then we had the homeland security's are here in the United States. These are terms are to specifically watch schooled and punish people like Jeff Bezos. And Mark Zuckerberg? And it is just the latest salvo in World War three most folks, don't even consider it a war. And then everyone recognize it as a war. But that's exactly how people in power want you to think everything's okay, nothing to worry about until they need you. Then they try to scare the bejesus out of you, hoping you are uninformed naive. And then they are more easily able to manipulate you. We try to do the opposite here on the voice to America program. So we'll hear what the. British government is trying to do. And whether it makes any sense, it's realistic and more importantly, what are the tech giant's going to do to push back? Because of course, they certainly are. It's just a big game of power. That's all it is. It's just a big game of who's the king of the sandbox? But the stakes are pretty high in these are the biggest players on the planet of urban planner itself. We'll have that coming up in about seven minutes. You just heard analysis from Europe about Julian Assange and his his arrest. Assange. The he protection for Ecuador Ecuador's government changed. Yeah. He's been in that embassy since two thousand twelve about a year and a half ago their government changed and they weren't so sympathetic to Assange Assange did nothing to help himself. And that's an interesting plan. I'm going to be curious to hear what Assange did because Assange basically got into a public spat with the new president of of Ecuador. I mean, he was posting embarrassing pictures. He was argue with. That's why when you first saw the news it's cold on the British police walked into the embassy and literally pulled Assange out. It's like we know how this the diplomatic game works. I mean, the whole point he could be in that embassy is because it wasn't British soil. It's it's it's Ecuadorian soil, even though it's in the middle of the United Kingdom in the middle of London in the middle of the United Kingdom, but you have that diplomatic immunity, and because he was a political prisoner asylum seeker as long as he stayed literally inside that building and didn't walk onto the sidewalk. The public. Space, you know, Assange, they couldn't touch them. They couldn't touch them. See literally lived in the room and ran around. But then Assange decided to get into a fight with with his with his benefactors really his his jailkeepers for that matter. And it's like, that's fine. If you can get out, but not to able to get out. And so it's as much Julian Assange decided to take an interesting tactic that certainly led to his arrest as anything else. But we're going to find out what the next move is the question, of course, to is is what value he brings. This is what I'm going to ask all of you. That are listening many of you follow this much closer than I do. But I try to follow it as closely as I can as of yet WikiLeaks has not published anything that is not the truth. I mean, that's what I understand. They claim that nobody has are said, look what your this is fake news or your made up or you've screwed up. Is that true? If you do know anything differently. Make.
"assange" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"Of them is just the effort of governments to soil. The journalist who was producing materials the people in power didn't want the rush multitude to Nobel. That's basically what happened WikiLeaks was producing things that people ought to know of those in power people in power could. So therefore, we have soil. Okay. Chomsky his yet to meet a Marxist dictator. He's in love. So I'll take all of that with a grain of salt from Noam Chomsky. Also when he suggests that Assange was just some sort of freedom fighter. Breaking information about the people in power. There's some of that. And then there's a lot of other stuff, then there's a lot of other stuff. The fact is that Assange has spent a good deal of his career revealing information that puts people in danger and the allegations against him. Here are not that he is that he revealed information because the Pentagon papers revealed information to the allegation here is that Assange was working with Bradley Manning to seal illegally information from US servers, according to the GOP DOJ indictment Assange agreed to assist manning and cracking passwords stored on the US department of defense. Computers connected to the secret internet protocol network. A US government network used for classified documents and communication. That's according to the indictment. Now, the indictment seems to go too far because the indictment suggests that when Assange told Bradley Manning, you know, keep your eyes open that that was something wrong. That's something. Journalists do all the time. But it is a fact that Assange being portrayed as some sort of innocent freedom fighter here is just not true. As I pointed out in two thousand eight in two thousand eight Assange published information about how the US army Jim signals meant to detonate improvised explosive devices that has no value other than to help people. Avoid the jamming of those signals. How was it journalistic to expose the name of Afghan and Iraqi informants how is that? How is that useful? As no Rothman at commentary magazine says that was not transparency was sabotage. People have been siding with Julian Assange based on whether the information he is revealing, but he can be both a bad character. And a person whose information is sometimes useful the same thing. I think is Edward Snowden the NSA whistle blower. I think some of the information revealed is useful. I also think that his motives, not only were not pure, but he turned over vast quantities of useful information to the Russian government. That's bad stuff. So all the people who are sticking up for for Julian Assange today when Noam Chomsky sticks up for Julian Assange Glenn Greenwald, six Julian Assange, count me skeptical of Julian Assange, these are people who do not have America's best foreign policy interests at heart to say, the least. Now with all that said, did it sounds something criminal. We'll find out. I don't know. But that's really not my concern as much as it is is Julian Assange, somebody worthy of our praise or is Julian Assange somebody who is worthy of our score any is much closer to scorn. Then to praise is at best in irresponsible person. Put a lot of people in danger because he wanted to be a hero. He is at worst a willing ally of the Russian government, which is suspicion on the part of many people in the intelligence community already coming up. We'll be joined by Lieutenant Colonel Allen west. He's going to join us to talk about a bevy of issues ranging from the crisis on our border to Ilhan Mars bizarre statements about nine eleven we'll also ask Lieutenant Colonel west about those white supremacy hearings on the hill that happened a little bit earlier this week morning at his take on all of those things coming up Lieutenant Colonel Allen west. This is the Ben Shapiro show. Five.
"assange" Discussed on WMAL 630AM
"Assange has been arrested in the Ecuadoran assembly. Sorry embassy in the UK derive via media at static. And for those of you that are not clear on why the drive by media is again, manufacturing wholesale live and the lie is that WikiLeaks was the recipient of David from the commute. Computers networks Democrat National Committee that were hacked by Russians. This is a myth is a story the Russians hacked the NCAA computers, and enga- whatever they got to Julian Assange and WikiLeaks who then began to publish it in September and October of two thousand sixteen stuff that WikiLeaks public. Wished where the emails have gone pedestrian, and they were interesting, and in some cases, embarrassing, and they were certainly unhelpful. So the Hillary campaign the truth is that whether or not the Russians hacked the DNC computers, the pedestrian emails were not part of it the pedestrian emails ended up in public because Podesta fell for a phishing scam on his own, computer. We all get them. He made the mistake of clicking on a link that exposed his computer and his hard drive to whoever it was that had sent him the fishing attack. And they've then had access to his hard drive, and they found the. Application in which he ran his emails, and they were able to harvest them. And that's what was sent to WikiLeaks. Joanie an office Hong has denied vociferiously profusely on never ously voluminous lay that the Russians didn't give him any. The Russians were not the people that gave him anything that. He had there's an alternate theory about who hacked, the D N C servers or networks or computers, and that alternate theory is that it was an inside job. There's actually three series the Russian theory theory number two, it's an inside job that somebody with in the DNC who was very unhappy that the whole thing was rigged against crazy. Bernie see this is this is what this upcoming investigation is going to show. It was the DNC that rigged election and that election was their primary, and they rigged it in favor of Hillary Clinton. She was as lousy campaigner during the democrat primaries as she was during the general election crazy Bernie was drawing all the crowds, and he was winning a significant number of delegates. But they had they had the game ring for Hillary. She was his show. Sure to get via the allocation of what are called super delegates the nomination at crazy Bernie ended up knowing it because but because you don't P inside the tent he swallowed it and went away to come back and fight another day which today for his chance at twenty twenty. So the second theory is that an insider in the DNC who was very much pro Bernie and very livid at how this whole thing had been read. Didn't hack anything just went in and downloaded a bunch of data on a thumb drive and fed that the Julian Assange or whoever now there is a lot of technological support for that theory. And let me explain it to you in terms that everybody who uses the computer can understand all of you who use a computer know that it takes a long time to download things unless you have a real high speed network. If you have gigabit Ethernet, and you have the ability to download at five hundred megabits a second or even up close to then you can download things pretty quickly. But most people don't have this. Most people have one hundred hundred fifty whatever their cable modem company supplies. You also know that if you attach a fund drive to your computer and transfer data from your hard drive to a thumb drive. It happens pretty quickly that transfer rate is really fast, and it doesn't happen on the internet. Well, it turns out FOX that for Wednesday analysis of the gave that that was at one time on the Democrat National Committee servers. That data transfer speeds were logged. And there's no way that the data could have been transferred over the internet. At the speeds that it was shown on the logs somebody. This is why this theory is very active. The prevailing opinion that nobody wants to talk about. And nobody's gonna make a big deal because nobody wants to focus on an inside job happening. But it looks it looks like somebody put a thumb drive. Into one of the computers attached to the network and started downloading data because the data transfer was lickety-split much faster than it could have happened even over gigabit Ethernet. For somebody to get the volume of data via an internet. Heck would have taken a long time. Even if they had. Gigabit Ethernet spades. The speeds vary depending on internet traffic, and how much traffic is on the source where you're trying to download data fraum and how many users it's all. It's all relative. It's never the same to download that arou-. Download speeds are really crazy. But that. The speed with which this data was transferred was lickety-split might my best. Guess is that this was actually inside job that nobody wants to talk about. There was a name at one time attached. The inside job is name is Seth rich. He is the guy who ended up being murdered shortly after all this happened. And some people tried to make the case that his murder was payback for having engaged at MS sympathize. It was quickly dispensed with another conspiracy theory fomented by bunch of radical creeps. What they're talking to the popular. Working explanation is that the Russians hacked DNC server and gave it to us on the third is that an affirmed actor looking like the Russians you can. You can disguise yourself as a hacker, and you can make it look like you're a Russian hacker CHAI com. Hacker North Korean hacker. This would be one of the goose affir- is made to look like a Russian hacker. But the pedestrian emails, which is what Assange hat and publicized did not come from any hack of any DNC, computer or server or network. The pedestrian emails ended up. On WikiLeaks because John Podesta himself fell for a phishing attack. This has been documented it is not arguable Podesta will not admit it. The media will not talk about it. Because it's just too Josie. The say that Assange got this stuff from the Russians. So when they used the love us on is what I want to focus on because now they hate Assange because I son JR. Supposedly participated in the sabotage of the DNC server, but he didn't he didn't whoever ran the phishing scam on pedestrian is who it was that game Wicky leaks pedestrian emails. Let's go back December fourteen thousand ten just as an example, we can founded bunch of these. Countdown with Keith Olbermann what better example to show, hyper liberalism, Michael Moore was the guest film maker, Michael Moore. And Keith over said, you offered the use of your website before Assange or your servers or anything else you can do to keep Wicky leaks alive. You wanna keep he leaks life as the Semper two thousand ten what's the premise of keeping WikiLeaks alive? A really oh a debt to Mr Assange Anthon Wiki leaks for turning on a big spotlight on those people who brought about first of all this war that we've been in for the better part of this decade. These people concocted lies, and they committed crimes in order to send our young men and women off to war. What if we had a Wiki leaks in August of nineteen sixty four when we were told that if. The North Vietnamese fired on a US ship, which in fact, was ally was concocted lie at the Pentagon. And we didn't find out about that until Daniel Ellsberg released. The Pentagon papers some six seven years later. What if there had been a Wiki leaks nine years ago babe nine years that loving themselves some WikiLeaks? Wikileaks was going to save the lift from the military industrial complex of the Republican party in George W Bush, Michael Moore continued with his praise and admirations for WikiLeaks. Imagine the Dick Cheney memo's back and forth as he was pressuring the CIA at the beginning. Just before this last arrack war started. What if those memos have been released in two thousand or two thousand three so the American people could see he was trying to get the agenda evidence in sort of fudge the facts, so they could make their case for war. I just think. A an instrument like WikiLeaks is vital for a free and open society to exist. Except now WikiLeaks ran the pedestrian emails. That's a last thing. Well, not the last thing WikiLeaks did. But one of the problems isn't WikiLeaks has actually been committed journalism compared to our drive-by media. Wikileaks has been committing journalism. The random at journalism now, then and publishing the emails. No, no, no, no. We can't have WikiLeaks used to expose democrat on. No, no, no way. We can't. We can't do that. So I'm gonna take a break. And when we come back, I wanna review some of these questions that I put together five eight journalist. I some questions for Obama and some questions for Hillary that real journalists would ask I see what you think that after Limbaugh radio program will continue. Rush Limbaugh annoying. The left coast.