40 Burst results for "Antonin Scalia"

Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on John Howell

John Howell

00:48 sec | 1 hr ago

Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on John Howell

"The late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia. And President Trump met with her yesterday at the White House. So when will the Senate vote? Will it be before the election or after the election? Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is not saying that will certainly do that. This year. The Senate isn't current Senate elected The last time in 2018 will be here live to the year and the president will be here till January. 20 Democrats, including Chuck Schumer of New York, acute ing, accusing McConnell of hypocrisy. Because he denied a hearing to President Obama's choice. Merrick Garland in 2016. They want to tilt the Supreme Court even further away, so it doesn't reflect the values of.

Senate Mitch Mcconnell President Trump Justice Antonin Scalia President Obama Merrick Garland Chuck Schumer White House Supreme Court New York
Barrett emerges as court favorite; Trump to pick by weekend

AP News Radio

00:53 sec | 16 hrs ago

Barrett emerges as court favorite; Trump to pick by weekend

"Hi Mike Rossi a reporting president trump plans to make a quick selection for the latest Supreme Court vacancy president Donald Trump wants possible Senate confirmation of his new Supreme Court nominee before election day let's say I make the announcement on Saturday there's a great deal of time before the election that'll be up to measure the Senate at the White House late Monday and later two stops in Ohio trump said he plans to put forward his nomination to replace justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Friday or Saturday but congressional Democrats like minority whip Dick Durbin are crying foul nation guided by the rule of law cannot have one set of rules under democratic presidents and another set under Republican presidents after the death of justice Antonin Scalia president Barack Obama's nomination of judge Merrick garland in March twenty sixteen was not brought to a vote by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell because it was an election year Mike Crossey up Washington

Merrick Garland Antonin Scalia Dick Durbin Ohio Supreme Court Washington Mike Crossey Mitch Mcconnell Mike Rossi Barack Obama Ruth Bader Ginsburg White House Senate Donald Trump President Trump
Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on Dumb, Gay Politics

Dumb, Gay Politics

02:16 min | 4 hrs ago

Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on Dumb, Gay Politics

"What I did was I compiled a drunk losers list of details that stood out to me personally and things that I know that I would want to tell Julie just like in our normal lives like anytime I wanted to call Julian be like, Oh, at her work and be like Oh. My fucking God you're going to die so I'm not going to be doing the bitch justice. There's there well, no. The justice like it's everywhere you know what I mean. You're doing I'm gay politics. This is what we're doing and this is what's up. So details like memo. Ruth. Bader GINSBURG. Landmark civil rights work before her. Women could not have credit cards in their names. And where you might think, oh, that's like probably like Mike Nineteen thirty. Now, that was in the seventies. I didn't know that. How fucked up is that? So, our mothers yes. Couldn't have credit cards in their names now I had to be thrown me on all I could think about was like, what was Pam? What was list? I can't even in the seventies every important I'm not every important thing. But most of the important work for women that Ruth Bader Ginsburg did was between nineteen, seventy, three and nineteen, seventy six. So these bitches. The PS as in Pam and Phyllis. Wiser they were walking around with no rights honey. Wow I. didn't even know that I know that's why I'm telling you. I'm so glad to know that I can't wait to go into feel validated for my work day. I really do I need to ask my mom about what early? From calling you, I was like she is going to shit. Oh. Sure I've. I'm not even going to ask my mom because God forbid she goes I don't even remember and we mom I know every time I. Ask because I don't even remember I'm like come on I can't please but I mean did it would like to maybe credit cards just like no. Maybe credit cards weren't even a big deal then but either way they couldn't even do like jury duty. I didn't include that in this because I didn't care, but it's the level of. Just. Like like a constant feeling of being demoted all the time like right getting the kitchen I duNno. You couldn't a lot of the stuff around money. You had to have a man. Yes. Well. That's I mean that's the credit card. That's it. History that little tidbit got me even more excited. Okay. I am so excited to hear the Special Brandy Howard curated gator content but before that what I can tell people is that Ruth Bader Ginsburg was on the Supreme Court if you don't know much about her or the Supreme Court good that's why you're here and don't ever let anyone shame you for not knowing something yet. The only way you know something is by learning it and then then you Know it and it doesn't matter when you learn it and that doesn't stop me. It doesn't matter when you learn it. We don't we're not born knowing everything and you're interested in some things are not interested in some things and you know more about one thing and everybody knows something more about something than somebody else and I'll have to say his Antonin Scalia Okay and anyone who knows that story from the fourteen listeners. There's an even more embarrassing Supreme Court story that has arisen through my gator research and it's A glorious okay. So. Here's some information for anyone who doesn't know anything about the Supreme Court? Okay. The Supreme Court has nine members. They are members for life and they are appointed by the president and voted on by the Senate they only leave the office if they die or voluntarily retire the point of having nine lifelong justices is so that there's a balance of power. It is unlikely that one party would dominate the Senate and the presidency for nine decades and for many many many years that system kind of were. Kind of there were four liberal judges and four conservative judges and one moderate ish judge. It's a sliding scale and whatever. But you get the point like there's always going to be some sort of fake fucking fairness right? Right. Right. It was always flawed because they were mostly men and mostly white and even when they weren't meant, they were mostly white and even when they weren't white, they were mostly white supremacists. That's why it's called the white supremacist. Quite supremacist. Okay but but regardless, black people and women manage to eke out some rights over the course of the existence of the Supreme Court and that is in thanks in large part to Thurgood Marshall and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Now, Thurgood Marshall died in one, thousand, nine, hundred, ninety, three, and that was the year that Bill Clinton nominated the gator to the Supreme Court, which probably was the best thing you ever did in his life. That's right which is why he doesn't need to be murdered and incidentally ruth. Bader GINSBURG was the first democratic nominee to the supreme court after Thurgood Marshall. And that was twenty, six years later, twenty, six, the two most. You know and this is coming just straight out of my asshole. But I'm just I'm GonNa Mariot the two most important people ever on the Supreme Court like are the grill agreed voting rights equal rights holder writes right six years well in between them and they never even served together saying the Democrats have dropped the ball with the Supreme Court is a mother. fucking understatement. The Supreme Court controls all of our rights, the rights that are not in the constitution voting marriage, our bodies custody of.

Supreme Court Ruth Bader Ginsburg Thurgood Marshall PAM Mike Nineteen Julie Antonin Scalia Senate Julian Bill Clinton President Trump Brandy Howard Phyllis
GOP senators push to fill Ginsburg's seat before Election Day

AP 24 Hour News

01:51 min | 23 hrs ago

GOP senators push to fill Ginsburg's seat before Election Day

"And GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell are making a push to nominate and confirm Ruth Bader Ginsburg, replacement at the Supreme Court before the November election. Trump telling a crowd in Dayton, Ohio. His plan is to nominate a woman. That is the only thing I'll say for the women. It will be a woman. Trump says his announcement will be made Friday or Saturday. Ginsberg's burial is next week at Arlington National Cemetery. Source says the conversations in the White House and McConnell's office have centered on two finalists Amy Cockney Barret, who is at the White House on Monday, and Barbara Lagoa. Garrett has long been a favorite of conservatives and was a strong contender for the seat that eventually went in 2018 to Brett Kavanaugh. Trump said today that he had five finalists probably 40 women and had started speaking to them over the past two days. McConnell insistence. Actions now are not counter to what he did in 2016 when he held up President Obama's nomination of merit Garland to take the seat left vacant by the death of Antonin Scalia. Even though the election was two thirds of a year away, McConnell said no appointment should be made during an election year. Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins says she's holding him to what he said then consistently and Being president. Staff. Four Republicans would be needed to block the president's speedy effort. Utah's Mitt Romney would only tell reporters before I have any kind of going with my colleagues, which I'll be doing tomorrow. And if I have something at that point, you know, But it is. Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski is also opposed to any such nomination and confirmation before the election.

Mitch Mcconnell Donald Trump Ruth Bader Ginsburg Senator Lisa Murkowski Senator Susan Collins Mitt Romney White House President Trump Amy Cockney Barret GOP Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh Barbara Lagoa Dayton Antonin Scalia President Obama Arlington National Cemetery Ohio Senate Ginsberg
Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on KYW 24 Hour News

KYW 24 Hour News

01:16 min | 5 hrs ago

Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on KYW 24 Hour News

"Nomination will have enough votes to pass in the Senate. Republican Mitt Romney today says he's on board with this party's leaders intention to press ahead with the confirmation process during an election year Now. Pennsylvania's Pat Toomey says he supports the Senate considering President Trump's forthcoming nominee, despite endorsing waiting until after the 2016 election to fill a vacancy under President Obama. What about Houston? Jimenez has details. Senator Toomey says he'll evaluate the president's election quote based on whether the nominee has the character, intellect and experience needed to serve on our nation's highest court. He says the difference between now and four years ago when a Supreme Court seat opened up is a divided government at that point, But after Republican victories, quote since the voters resolve the tension between the White House and the Senate, there is no reason to delay filling this vacancy. Now Democrats have been using statements Republicans made in 2016. Lean on why a precedent was set and a vote should not take place after Justice Antonin Scalia's death to me, said quote. This decision should not be rushed, and it should not be made amid the clamoring of a presidential election season after President Obama nominated Merrick Garland to me, said, quote with the U. S. Supreme Court's balance at stake and with the presidential election fewer than eight months away. It is wise to give the American people amore direct voice in the selection and confirmation of the next Justice. Election Day is now six weeks away. Tim Jimenez KOW news radio. It's 302 just ahead, Poison sent to the White House. A woman's been arrested. I've got details after we check traffic.

Senate Senator Toomey President Obama U. S. Supreme Court President Trump Tim Jimenez White House Mitt Romney Justice Antonin Scalia Merrick Garland Pennsylvania Houston Donald Trump
The Latest: Manchin against high court vote before election

AP News Radio

00:51 sec | 1 d ago

The Latest: Manchin against high court vote before election

"The majority in the Senate is pushing for a quick vote on a replacement for the late Supreme Court justice Ruth pater Ginsburg president trump wants a vote by election day Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says he will get it we're gonna vote on this nomination on this floor McConnell brought up why there was no vote in twenty sixteen after the death of justice Antonin Scalia right on the wall is asking Senate Republican or non usual favor McConnell says the president now has the majority party in the Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer says it's an exercise in raw political power and nothing nothing more Schumer says this could have a long lasting impact if his Senate majority over the course of six years steals two Supreme Court seats using completely contradictory rationales how could we be how could we expect to trust the other side again and Donahue Washington

Senate Donald Trump Majority Leader Mitch Mcconnel Antonin Scalia President Trump Chuck Schumer Donahue Washington Supreme Court Ruth Pater Ginsburg
Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on AP 24 Hour News

AP 24 Hour News

00:59 min | 5 hrs ago

Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on AP 24 Hour News

"His AP News I'm reading President Trump's ally, Lindsey Graham, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, says they have the votes to confirm the president's Supreme Court nominee. Whoever it turns out to be Before the presidential election. Angry Democrats are fighting back AP correspondent Mike Rossi with the latest at the White House late Monday and later a two stops in Ohio. Trump said he plans to put forward his nomination to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Friday or Saturday. But congressional Democrats like Minority Whip Dick Durbin, are crying foul nation guided by a rule of law. Cannot have one set of rules under Democratic presidents and another set under Republican presidents after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, President Barack Obama's nomination of Judge Merrick Garland in March. 2016 was not brought to a vote by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell because it was an election year might cross. CIA. Washington Prime Minister Boris Johnson is warning the British they should not expect to return to a normal social or work life for at least six months. As he orders new restrictions that he hopes will slow down a dramatic rise in Corona virus cases. The world is nearing one million deaths from the virus, almost 200,000 of them here in the U. S. Tropical storm beta flooded streets in Houston and Galveston this morning, hours after making landfall near Port O'Connor, Texas stand. McCarty lives about a three hour drive east in Jamaica Beach taxes. The most flooding we've seen here in.

President Trump Prime Minister Boris Johnson Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Senate Judiciary Committee Justice Antonin Scalia President Barack Obama Dick Durbin Supreme Court Lindsey Graham Judge Merrick Garland Mitch Mcconnell Senate Mike Rossi Jamaica Beach Port O'connor CIA White House
The Latest: Manchin against high court vote before election

AP News Radio

00:51 sec | 1 d ago

The Latest: Manchin against high court vote before election

"The majority in the Senate is pushing for a quick vote on a replacement for the late Supreme Court justice Ruth pater Ginsburg president trump wants a vote by election day Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says he will get it we're gonna vote on this nomination on this floor McConnell brought up why there was no vote in twenty sixteen after the death of justice Antonin Scalia right on the wall is asking Senate Republican or non usual favor McConnell says the president now has the majority party in the Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer says it's an exercise in raw political power and nothing nothing more Schumer says this could have a long lasting impact if his Senate majority over the course of six years steals two Supreme Court seats using completely contradictory rationales how could we be how could we expect to trust the other side again and Donahue Washington

Senate Donald Trump Majority Leader Mitch Mcconnel Antonin Scalia President Trump Chuck Schumer Donahue Washington Supreme Court Ruth Pater Ginsburg
Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

The Erick Erickson Show

01:52 min | 7 hrs ago

Fresh update on "antonin scalia" discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

"All of you people in your resistance fan fiction in your red robes and nonsense a you're not serious people you are part of a cult. Now, who actually is amy conybeare it not the monster that Democrats say she was Amy Cody Jarrett was Antonin Scalia favourite law clerk. Hands down across time and space. She was Antonin Scalia favorite law clerk. He would refer her as his favourite years after she stopped being his law clerk she was his favourite law clerk and she loves Antonin Scalia and if you like scalise jurisprudence, you're GonNa Love Amy Conybeare it. If you don't like Scalia, you're not gonNA like Amy Conybeare. When it comes to criminal defendants and their rights and law. Enforcement. She is aligns more with Scalia than with Gorsuch Gorsuch has trended as aligned with Sonia Solomon a lot on criminal defendant rights on the Supreme Court. Livy read you for reason, magazine when it comes to the rights of criminal defendants and the actions of law enforcement agencies. The conservative label covers a wide range of attitudes although progressives tend to depict Justice Antonin Scalia as an daughter Ogre. For instance, he sided with defendants and several important fourth amendment and sixty amendment cases. Neal Gorsuch, the judge President Donald, trump's pick to replace scalia has shown an even stronger inclination to uphold the rights of. The accused into question the conduct of police officers and prosecutors repeatedly breaking with fellow conservatives such as Lido in. Thomas. By contrast contrast fifth, circuit, Judge James Oh another candidate on trump's list of potential supreme court nominees showed a troubling difference to law enforcement and a twenty one, thousand, nine case involving a man killed by Texas Sheriff's Deputies. The Opinions Barrett has written in cases brought by criminal defendants and prisoners joining the US Circuit Court of Appeals. In two, thousand, seventeen, present a mixed picture. while. She is often skeptical of the government's arguments when it tries to put or keep people in prison, she has sometimes rejected claims by defendants and prisoners that her colleagues found credible. It is clear for Barrett's record that she does not reflexively side with the government in criminal cases in two thousand, nineteen opinion. For example, she concluded that Drug Enforcement Administration agents violated the fourth amendment when they searched a suspect's apartment based on the consent of a woman who answered the door but did not live there. It is reasonable for officers to assume that a woman who answers the door at a bathrobe has considered to authority to consent to search of a male..

Justice Antonin Scalia Amy Cody Jarrett Amy Conybeare Drug Enforcement Administratio Gorsuch Gorsuch Us Circuit Court Of Appeals Barrett Supreme Court Donald Trump Judge James Oh Sonia Solomon Texas Thomas President Donald
Judge dreadthe fight for Ruth Bader Ginsburgs seat

The Economist: The Intelligence

08:29 min | 1 d ago

Judge dreadthe fight for Ruth Bader Ginsburgs seat

"On Friday US Supreme Court. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died of cancer at the age of eighty seven. A candlelit vigil was held the following day outside the Supreme Court. Justice. GINSBURG was only the second woman appointed to the Supreme Court after being nominated by Bill Clinton in one thousand, nine hundred. I. In. Solemnly swear he was a champion of women's rights, and later in life she achieved restore status especially among young women. Now her death has set the stage for a divisive battle to replace her on the court. She was born in Brooklyn to an immigrant Father Dad was from Odessa in in Russia and to a first generation mother she was Jewish John. Fascination is the economist Washington correspondent and she was a trailblazer throughout her life. She was one of only nine women among five hundred men at Harvard law school, and when she arrived. Erwin griswold, who was then the Dean asked women in the class to stand up and justify taking a spot that could have gone to a man. She said the reason she took the spot is it was important that she understood her husband's work that would've made her husband Marty last Mardi was tax attorney well known in his own right he predeceased her but they had a famously loving and productive and equal partnership. She had a relentless work ethic in. Twenty five years in the Supreme Court she never missed today she's arrived four bouts of cancer before this fifth one killed her it was only after she got sick that she called by phone to oral arguments. I. Think People often have this idea that Supreme Court justices are sort of Stentorian wizards ready to shout down lawyer who they disagree with justice. GINSBURG was not like that she spoke very slowly very deliberately, which mirrors I think how she wrote and how she argued and how she thought she was meticulous. She was precise she she was not a showy justice. She came onto the court actually considered a moderate. There are a lot of people on the left who were upset when she was appointed because she was considered sort of two centrist. But as the court steadily moved rightward during her tenure, she has found herself the de facto leader of the courts liberal wing. Junk she spent a long time on the court. What did she achieve? Well, she was on the Supreme Court for Twenty seven years, and before that was on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, which is widely considered the second most important court in America for for thirteen. So she was a judge for forty years I was age sixty when I was nominated in some people thought I was. Too Old for the job. Now I'm into my twenty-seventh starting my twenty-seventh year on the courts on one of the longest tenured. Justices. So if you worried about my age. It was unnecessary. Before that, she argued six cases before the Supreme Court and she was involved with thirty more as the first director of the US women's rights project. The first of those report court cases was in Reid versus Reid for which she wrote a brief arguing against the law in Ohio that preferred men to women in naming executive estates. She won that case in her first oral argument before the Supreme Court. She argued against the military policy that denied many husbands, officers, the same housing and medical benefits that automatically provided officers. Wise. The thinking was that women are somehow inherently more dependent on their husbands and husbands on their wise. Now, in that case, remember she effectively represented the husband she represented family but she represented the shoes argue in favor of the husband's benefits and she austin said that she was not arguing for women's rights she was arguing for the constitutional equality of men and women. Her death is come at a critical time in American politics. It's just six weeks away from the election. So what impact does that have? Well I think it's a little too early to say that definitively. It looks as though both sides are gearing up for battle, but they seem to be quietly circling each other in two thousand sixteen. The Supreme Court is central to Donald Trump's success I think because. There is an open seat in two thousand, Sixteen Justice Antonin Scalia died, and Mitch McConnell who is then the Senate minority leader rather than hold a hearing on Barack Obama's chosen replacement for Justice Scalia whose Merrick Garland he came up with a rationale disguises the principle which was that the causing election was coming up the speech beheld open. So the voters could decide now that had never been done before it was clearly a power play. It was a live sort of issue for Republicans impelled I think a lot of them who otherwise would have held donald trump at arm's length to decide that just had to vote for him this time I. Think Donald Trump is hoping for a similar effect this time, but he also wants to get the filled as quickly as possible. For Democrats donations had started pouring in, they have been pouring all weekend. Democrats seem riled up by this. I think in their view if Donald Trump managed to get a successor onto the court, this'll be the seconds effectively stolen seat right? The I was Neil Gorsuch. who was given the seat that was held open by Mitch McConnell, and the second would be whoever donald trump nominees to replace justice GINSBURG who gets the seat because Mitch McConnell did not follow the principle he set up in two thousand sixteen. John Do you think Senate. Republicans have the numbers to they have the votes to get in trump's nominee through before the election. Well this is the question on everyone's mind. Right so far Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski Republican senators from from Maine Alaska, had said that they will not vote for replacement before November third they have said that the president who wins on November third you choose the replacement now that only gets Democrats to forty nine and they need fifty one because in the case of a tie Mike. Pence cast the tiebreaking vote Lindsey Graham had previously said he would abide by Mitch McConnell's rule from twenty sixteen. He has now gone back on that apparently because he's angry Democrats didn't roll over for Brad Cavanaugh Chuck. Grassley, who's a senator from Iowa has also previously spoken in favor of McConnell's precedent. I, have a very hard time imagining that when push comes to shove, he'll stand by his. Word and so there really is nothing Democrats can do unless they can persuade two other Republicans to come join them, and if they can't persuade those Republicans and tip the balance what happens. Then what are the consequences for the years ahead on American politics? It's clear that what McConnell did in two thousand sixteen was a tremendous violation of norms I think it's not a good principal to. Uphold I think arguing that this is now how Supreme Court seats should be awarded that in an election year, you effectively have to hold the seat open until the end of the election is a bad precedent but I think there's a difference between saying Republicans should be consistent for the sake of consistency and Republicans should follow this principle because that's how court seat should be given out now. From the Democratic Base, there's been a tremendous push to threaten Republicans with repercussions if. Retake. The Senate and the president in that includes making Puerto Rico in Washington DC states, which would effectively at least in the near in medium-term Give Democrats four senators people have also been talking about expanding the court. So the reason they are Nice Ring Court justices is not constitutional legal. It's just a statute. So if they were minded and had a majority had a president who would sign it into law, they put eleven or thirteen justices on the supreme court. The problem with that for Democrats I think is that it sort of shifts the terms. Of the debate that they are now winning I think the way Joe, Biden has pitched. This campaign is on the one hand. You have the sort of chaotic destructive Donald Trump on the other. You have Joe Biden Palm known figure who will get us back to normal. If, he comes out and endorses expanding the court or State of DC in Puerto Rico, which to be clear he has not done. He is actually a opposed expanded from court but if he comes out if Democrats threaten this, then the debate becomes a lot murkier. Then it becomes the radical change that Joe Biden wants to do right take fifty, two states and putting thirteen on Supreme Court against Donald Trump will keep things as are I think that debate does not play out very well for Democrats. John Thank you very much time.

Supreme Court Donald Trump Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Mitch Mcconnell Dc Circuit Court Of Appeals United States Joe Biden Senator Senate Justice Antonin Scalia Democrats John Bill Clinton President Trump Erwin Griswold Harvard Law School Brooklyn Puerto Rico Odessa Washington
"antonin scalia" Discussed on NewsRadio 1020 KDKA

NewsRadio 1020 KDKA

04:53 min | 2 d ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on NewsRadio 1020 KDKA

"I think mostly what comes to mind is a remarkable life that she made. This was a person who born in 1933. It came up through a legal system, which which was very difficult for any woman to try to perverse during her lifetime. She faced. Although she was a student at all levels is a very difficult time going up through their career. It was a woman of the law school to her. Perhaps he was taking on the law school that shouldn't reserve remand. Our time getting hired by Big City law firm because of the policies and practices in its upon her strong views on the bench about gender equality. We're learning from her very life and with our lists of whether one it believes O. R doesn't believe in her views and her opinions disagrees with them. You have to give this person a tremendous amount of credit for demonstrating resolved. And and a capacity to overcome the obstacles that were unfairly placed in her path as she came up through the law. What do you think it was about her? That made it to where she could be viewed as liberal as she wass. But at the same time have maybe what's been publicly described as a great relationship with the late Justice Antonin Scalia obviously may be the most conservative. The individual on the bench during his time on the Supreme Court. I think it was that she was She was not a mere academic liberal. She believed In the underlying human nature of many of the issues which she advocated and again. Scalia would have disagreed with her. But they were both people who I think understood a great deal about the human condition and had different views about how Government and legal policies should address those legal issues. But They were both fundamentally concerned about the real world impact of their decisions, and I think that sort of thing. Reads a respect between individuals in certain certain between notices and then on the court. What I believe is that absolutely necessary balance on this record that's sort of like one of the greatest culture that is constructed with fine weather system needs someone on site to be able to keep institution red. They were certainly that on this speak word, providing necessary form of bait a capacity to articulate their positions well, And not simply in the pragmatic way, but they're practically and and for that reason, giving the Supreme Court a great sense of legitimacy and and the ability to grow a CZ we know from history. Many of the dissenting opinions of years ago become majority opinions at a later time, And for that reason they, their president, served a great Public function on the Supreme Court. There's a lot of concern that's been expressed right now. But what happens if there is a constitutional issue regarding the election kind of similar to what took place? In Bush Gore in 2000 with the bench seemingly at 44. Are there any concerns that you have and What would be the process for determining if there was to be some type of a court challenge that could make his way up to the Supreme Court? There is no alternative to the Supreme Court's ruling. There is no court higher there. There is no other forums to go to press. Constitutional issues. And it's in a situation where You might have a true crisis with regard to the legitimacy of the election. The justices on the bench and again. I know that there is a lot of talk about, you know, is there going to be an attempt to nominate and confirm a justice now before? The November election. But assuming that that does not What happened? An idea flitted. So something had happened to Bill. This one of the justice is going to have to step up and provide a continuity that we, along with the headlock and spin called incapable of that. You had that impair their faces. Great National shift in emphasis we've seen doesn't change much out of certainly during the demonstration of Franklin Roosevelt were million Jewel..

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Franklin Roosevelt Big City Bush Gore Bill O. R president
Trump says he will nominate woman to the Supreme Court next week

The Morgan Show with Morgan White, Jr.

00:55 sec | 2 d ago

Trump says he will nominate woman to the Supreme Court next week

"Trump Trump is is speaking speaking out out about about his his efforts efforts to to nominate nominate a a person person to to replace replace Justice Justice Ruth Ruth Bader Bader Ginsburg Ginsburg on on the Supreme Court. Your CBS is Steve Dorsey in Washington, President Trump told White House reporters will likely choose a woman as early as next week. I could see most likely it would be a woman. Yeah, I think I could say that it would be a woman. I would, uh If somebody were to ask me now, I would say that A woman would be In first place. The president is also defending his power to choose a Supreme Court nominee in an election year way have an obligation to the voters. All of the people the millions of people that put us here in the form of a victory. We have an obligation to them. All of those voters Democrats are reminding Republicans. They blocked President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court after Justice Antonin Scalia's death, arguing voters should decide in the 2016 election.

Justice Justice Ruth Ruth Bade Trump Trump Supreme Court President Trump Justice Antonin Scalia President Obama Steve Dorsey Merrick Garland White House CBS Washington
Trump says he will nominate woman to the Supreme Court next week

The Morgan Show with Morgan White, Jr.

00:55 sec | 2 d ago

Trump says he will nominate woman to the Supreme Court next week

"Trump Trump is is speaking speaking out out about about his his efforts efforts to to nominate nominate a a person person to to replace replace Justice Justice Ruth Ruth Bader Bader Ginsburg Ginsburg on on the Supreme Court. Your CBS is Steve Dorsey in Washington, President Trump told White House reporters will likely choose a woman as early as next week. I could see most likely it would be a woman. Yeah, I think I could say that it would be a woman. I would, uh If somebody were to ask me now, I would say that A woman would be In first place. The president is also defending his power to choose a Supreme Court nominee in an election year way have an obligation to the voters. All of the people the millions of people that put us here in the form of a victory. We have an obligation to them. All of those voters Democrats are reminding Republicans. They blocked President Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court after Justice Antonin Scalia's death, arguing voters should decide in the 2016 election.

Justice Justice Ruth Ruth Bade Trump Trump Supreme Court President Trump Justice Antonin Scalia President Obama Steve Dorsey Merrick Garland White House CBS Washington
Who Will Replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg? McConnell Vows Vote

KYW 24 Hour News

01:19 min | 3 d ago

Who Will Replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg? McConnell Vows Vote

"Political shift is looming over America's highest court with last night's death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg would come the pancreatic cancer at age 87. Correspondent Steve Futterman takes a look back. She was just fine foot one but was a giant in the U. S Supreme Court. She became a justice in 1993 and loved her job the best but also the hottest job that I ever had. After her death was announced, people gathered at the high court to pay tribute. She was a legend, well beyond her time on the floor as much impacted skins Berg head on the court. She was prominent before her appointment. CBS's Major Garrett she was part of a litigation team that brought a case that changed American law. No discrimination on the basis of sex. There is a movie about this and about her advocacy for that position. President Trump had praised for Ginsburg. What else can you say she was an amazing woman. Now the battle over her replacement. Democrats say the appointment should be made by whoever wins the election in November, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Freeze, insisting President Trump's nominee will get a vote on the Senate floor. Four years ago, He put off a confirmation vote for then nominee Merrick Garland, noting Antonin Scalia's death came too close to the presidential election. Scalia died in February.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg U. S Supreme Court President Trump Antonin Scalia Steve Futterman Senate Majority Senate Mitch Mcconnell Merrick Garland America CBS Major Garrett
Mitch McConnell vows US Senate will push on with Trump's pick to replace Ginsburg

AP 24 Hour News

00:27 sec | 3 d ago

Mitch McConnell vows US Senate will push on with Trump's pick to replace Ginsburg

"Ginsberg's the first city justice to pass away sins Antonin Scalia, who died during the 2016 presidential race. Then President Obama nominated Merrick Garland for Scalia seat. But Senate GOP chief Mitch McConnell refused to act before the election. The next president, whoever that may be, is going to be the person who chooses the next Supreme Court justice, but McConnell has said he would move to confirm a trump nominee if there was a vacancy this year.

Mitch Mcconnell Antonin Scalia President Obama Merrick Garland President Trump Supreme Court Ginsberg GOP Senate
Ruth Bader Ginsburg's last wish: 'I will not be replaced until a new president is installed'

John Howell

01:58 min | 4 d ago

Ruth Bader Ginsburg's last wish: 'I will not be replaced until a new president is installed'

"Bader Ginsburg has died. Of complications from pancreatic cancer. Ginsberg was a Ah ah liberal icon 87 years old. She had been on the court for 27 years, She had been an architect for women's rights Back in the 19 seventies. She's been battling cancer for a long time. And now tonight The U. S. Supreme Court has announced that Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died of complications from cancer. And of course this is going to be a big Big issue. In a presidential race that was already filled John how with huge huge issues, So now the question is Will President Trump try to get Ah New justice on the Supreme Court before you know the candlesticks of this previous His previous policy of not bringing that up during a presidential election election right during the election cycle. Yeah, that's what he said in 2016 with Mary Garland. Antonin Scalia died, right. Right. So so, yeah, that we'll see. I've noticed people switch sides from time to time is situational ethics are definitely alive. Politically, aren't they? Yes, so we shall see. This is really going to disappoint. My sister was a big fan. She's an attorney in Michigan. But she was constantly centime. Excerpts from Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Down and down and then wanted me to read Maura about her and and so on and so forth. So, yeah, Breaking news is Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Eiji, seven years old battle pancreatic cancer for a long time Supreme Court announced just minutes ago that she has passed away Big topic conversation over the weekend. We'll be back on it. Gonna show apparently dictated this statement to her granddaughter as she is, her strength waned in the last few days. Quote my most fervent wish is that I will not be replaced until the new president is installed.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg U. S. Supreme Court Pancreatic Cancer Ginsberg Attorney Antonin Scalia John Eiji President Trump Mary Garland Michigan Maura
Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if reelected

Morning Edition

04:00 min | Last week

Trump unveils list of possible Supreme Court picks if reelected

"All right. Amid the uproar over the president's pandemic response, A new item appeared on the White House schedule yesterday, and it was very clearly a change of subject. I am announcing 20 additions to my original list. Of candidates for the United States Supreme Court That list served him well and energizing conservatives. Back in 2016, NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg reports on what he is offering in 2020. Administration insiders, Khun See that this list of 20 names is a validly more political. While the previous three lists included just one elected politician and no administration officials, this one includes three U. S. Senators all fire breathing conservative Republicans, Arkansas's Tom Cotton. Ted Cruz of Texas and Missouri's Josh Holly. All three have directly or indirectly criticized Chief Justice John Roberts for not being conservative enough, and all three have presidential ambitions. Indeed, Holly tweeted that he's not really interested in a seat on the court. Also on the list are a top White House lawyer and to top officials from the Trump Justice Department, including former solicitor General Noel Francisco who've carried Trump's legal banner in the courts. Perhaps the most interesting name on the list is Paul Clement, who served as solicitor general in the George W. Bush administration and is considered perhaps the best legal advocate among the very able lawyers who practice regularly before the Supreme Court. Clement has an added value. He's represented a variety of conservative interests before the court from gun rights advocates to religious groups to groups opposed to Obama care. As for federal judges on the list, they're all trump appointees with records hostel through abortion, voting rights legislation, LGBT rights and regulation of business and the environment. According to sources involved in compiling the list. The White House counsel, as is usual, presided over the process. But White House chief of staff Mark Meadows was aggressively involved and even the president's son in law. Jared Kushner, got into the act, as did some conservative senators like Holly, who pushed back against including Federal appeals court judge Naomi Row because of some of her writings prior to becoming a judge, But as a judge, she's written some of the lower court decisions most supportive of Trump. With the latest list of 20 new names now added to the 45 names on his previous lists. Trump on Wednesday blasted Democrat Joe Biden for failing to release a comparable list and the president issued a dark warning about the future. If Biden is elected and has an opportunity to pick one or more justices, radical justices will erase the Second Amendment. Silence political speech and require taxpayers to fund extremely term abortion. In fact, the courts five conservative justices are all in good health and two of them. Trump appointees Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh are the youngest members of the court at 53 55, respectively. The only ailing justices 87 year old Ruth Bader Ginsburg, leader of the court's liberal wing, who's being treated for 1/5 bout with cancer, her second cancer in less than two years. Should she leave the court. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell has said that the GOP would fill the sea even though McConnell four years ago refused for nearly a year. To allow hearings on President Obama's nominee to fill the seat of Justice Antonin Scalia, who died unexpectedly in February of 2016. McConnell's justification for blocking the nomination of Judge Merrick Garland was that the voters have a right to make their views known in the presidential election. A rationale that GOP leader is not embracing this year. Nina Totenberg NPR NEWS Washington

Supreme Court President Trump White House Josh Holly Donald Trump Paul Clement Nina Totenberg Trump Justice Department Joe Biden Chief Justice John Roberts Barack Obama Mitch Mcconnell Judge Merrick Garland GOP Justice Antonin Scalia NPR Khun See Ruth Bader Ginsburg Tom Cotton
Big Tech Funds a Think Tank Pushing for Fewer Rules. For Big Tech.

Pivot

05:03 min | 2 months ago

Big Tech Funds a Think Tank Pushing for Fewer Rules. For Big Tech.

"Dig. Tech firms are schmoozing regulators into to not doing their jobs. Thirty four anti-trust officials were wined and nine last year by the global anti-trust into the suit, a part of the Antonin Scalia Law School at George. Mason University in Fairfax Virginia basically don't regulate us. Please enjoy this delicious meal. Global Antitrust Institute is funded mostly entirely by big companies affiliated foundations including Amazon Google qualcomm George Mason I covered it when I was at the Washington, Post they were always doing this kind of thing like putting up, you know. Being very friendly to corporate corporate citizens as I recall during this time when they were just getting started. Trying to attract a bigger level of professor there and so talk about this Mr Academics in terms of these things that get funded at universities, you institute Scott. Galloway Institute of Jabal Thank for example. That's right. like it's it's were. Universities are not immune from the lure of capitalism and a big component of. Your ability to get tenure is to get research funded, and it's difficult if you WANNA know. If. You WanNa. Know the outcome and a conclusion of research. Just find who's paid for it. Yeah, and in the case of most academic research. It's a lot of times it's funded. By nonpartisan sources are the university itself, and so if there is a a lease bad version of peer reviewed research, you're GONNA. Find it typically universities, but these think tanks if they're funded by. Certain And we have him on the left care we fund. We found groups to do research to basically support our know our narrative so i. don't think this is anything unusual. The question is abound power in that is. In addition to this think tank Sarah now more fulltime Amazon. Lobbyists making I would bet somewhere between four hundred eight hundred thousand dollars a year. Then there are sitting US senators now one hundred full time lobbyist from Amazon living in DC, taking all of these nice women and men to to golf into dinner and saying hey, we just a big fan of your leadership. We fight to get involved in your campaign by the way when this whole antitrust off comes up. We assume that you're you're for capitalism. Your four consumer lower consumer prices. And this is the danger, but I don't think these think tanks. We have on both sides nervous now whenever I time talking to one today and I was like Oh, where did you get your money? Like I never thought this like in terms of. The university and I was like I'm going to have to check in case, I'm. Saying something that sounded reasonable, but it was sort of like who's paying your bills and you know there was some controversy around some of this Kobe testing of where these these researchers have, it just feels like a lot of steph feels. Bogus like. It feels bogus when they're doing this and they're trying to influence, but I think many some universities are doing real research. Others are much more pay for play and I think that's that's really when I was a does. You've inspired her synapse farmer talking about this when I was? Five years into my Nyu Kerr invited me to a meeting where they were talking about doing some research about around financial markets and the impact on IPO's and They admitted meeting. And there was someone from the Nasdaq, and they were willing to fund it Funds Research and fund even fund center, and as one of the guys in the meeting Professor Bruce Buchanan who I think's one of the clear blue flame thinking economists in the world you know at the end of the meeting, said a not comfortable with the Nasdaq taking money. Money from the Nasdaq for research around the financial markets, because ultimately we're. GonNa end up saying that that the Nasdaq has the right you know. He just wasn't comfortable with private enterprise being injected into academic research, and then the meeting ended and I was like what the hell are you thinking? We have an opportunity to go great research here. Don't so pedantic. And as I've thought about it I'm wrong and he was right. Yeah, you can't help it. You can't help, but if they're paying for like all the smoking ones so much damage in terms of like smoking wants. We're like cigarettes aren't bad. That went on for a long time and Whatever the whatever the research is, it just seems like if it's cooked, it's cooked then. How do you pay for like the university should presumably just pay. Pay For right and live and die on the quality of the research, but that's sort of naive. I suspect you in the majority of about any sort of fifteen year overdue apology to a Professor Buchanan Vice. Chancellor Ingo Walter felt the same way that this was just. This creates too much opportunity for bias research so anyways. Net Net in it's a sample size of one, but Nyu takes that got role being a neutral arbiter very seriously. and. You have these funding you know. I'm thinking of all the different organizations are they seem like the like their criminal justice stuff Very Friedman! It feels like it's really good research right now, and that's the thing it's like who you have. They should at least be very clear about who's paying for it, so you know and and what they might turf. What what the what reports they might put in the drawer like the government is doing right now,

Amazon Global Antitrust Institute Galloway Institute Of Jabal Antonin Scalia Law School George Mason Mason University NYU Washington Fairfax Virginia United States Funds Research Chancellor Ingo Walter Professor Buchanan Vice Professor Professor Bruce Buchanan Friedman Sarah Kobe
Amid furor over monuments, Trump seeks `garden' of US heroes

AP News Radio

00:51 sec | 2 months ago

Amid furor over monuments, Trump seeks `garden' of US heroes

"Amid the furor over monuments president trump is proposing to establish a national garden of American heroes a vast outdoor park that will feature the statues of the greatest Americans to ever live president trump's proposed garden would pay tribute to more than thirty Americans from founding fathers in presidents including George Washington Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln to civil rights and social activists like Martin Luther king junior Susan B. Anthony Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman as well as explorers an aviation pioneers such as the Wright brothers in Amelia Earhart trump's initial list includes generals Billy Graham and the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia absent are any native American or Hispanic people the White House declined to comment on how the list was assembled Ben Thomas Washington

Donald Trump Abraham Lincoln Susan B. Anthony Frederick Dou Antonin Scalia White House Ben Thomas Washington President Trump George Washington Thomas Jeffe Martin Luther Harriet Tubman Wright Amelia Earhart Billy Graham Supreme Court
Eugene Scalia Confirmed by Senate as Labor Secretary

WBBM Programming

00:38 sec | 1 year ago

Eugene Scalia Confirmed by Senate as Labor Secretary

"President trump has a new labor secretary Ording along party lines the Republican led Senate confirmed attorney Eugene Scalia a son of the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia as president Donald trump's new labor secretary the vote was fifty three forty four the fifty six year old Scully has spent most of his career as a partner in the Washington office of the Gibson Dunn and Crutcher firm representing business interests challenging labor and financial regulations Scully also served for a year as the labor department's top lawyer during the George W. bush administration the AFL CIO opposed Scalia calling him a union busting lawyer might Rossio

Ording Senate Antonin Scalia Donald Trump Secretary Scully Partner Gibson Dunn CIO Rossio President Trump Attorney Supreme Court Washington George W. Bush AFL Fifty Six Year
Eugene Scalia Confirmed by Senate as Labor Secretary

Mark Levin

00:33 sec | 1 year ago

Eugene Scalia Confirmed by Senate as Labor Secretary

"News Senate signs off on president trump's pick to lead the labor department for labor department attorney Eugene Scalia has been confirmed as labor secretary fifty three to forty four Scalia is the son of the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia he was nominated to lead the labor department after Alex Acosta resigned over the summer Scalia was the top lawyer at the labor department in two thousand one in private practice he has defended corporate clients from workplace complaints and regulations it is that worked at Democrats pointed to in their opposition on Capitol Hill Jared how burn

Senate Donald Trump Antonin Scalia Alex Acosta Private Practice Capitol Hill Jared President Trump Attorney Secretary Supreme Court
Trump, Eugene Scalia And Antonin Scalia discussed on Laura Ingraham

Laura Ingraham

00:16 sec | 1 year ago

Trump, Eugene Scalia And Antonin Scalia discussed on Laura Ingraham

"Trump announces that he's going to nominate Eugene Scalia the son of late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia to replace Alex Acosta as the secretary of labor this announcement came yesterday late afternoon Scully at fifty five is the oldest son of the late Supreme Court justice it'll be interesting to see the reactions to

Donald Trump Eugene Scalia Antonin Scalia Alex Acosta Secretary Scully Supreme Court
Antonin Scalia, Trump And Secretary discussed on Glenn Beck

Glenn Beck

00:16 sec | 1 year ago

Antonin Scalia, Trump And Secretary discussed on Glenn Beck

"The son of the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia's president trump's picked to be the next labor secretary the president made the announcement on Twitter yesterday saying Eugene Scalia has quote level life of great success and quote school you previously served as Solicitor of the labor department during president George W. bush's

Antonin Scalia Donald Trump Secretary President Trump Twitter Eugene Scalia Labor Department Supreme Court George W. Bush
Trump to Nominate Eugene Scalia for Labor Secretary Job

10 10 WINS 24 Hour News

00:33 sec | 1 year ago

Trump to Nominate Eugene Scalia for Labor Secretary Job

"President trump tweeted last night he is nominating Jean Scalia as the next labor secretary Jackie Quinn has that story if you gene Scalia's last name sounds familiar it's because he's the son of the late Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia he's a partner in the DC law firm president trump tweets that school Leah is highly respected as a lawyer with great experience working with labor and everyone else secretary Alex Acosta resigned in a controversy over a lenient plea deal for Q. sex trafficker Jeffrey obscene while on a cost was a U. S. and turning in

Donald Trump Jean Scalia Jackie Quinn Antonin Scalia Leah Alex Acosta President Trump Secretary Gene Scalia Supreme Court DC
"antonin scalia" Discussed on KTTH 770AM

KTTH 770AM

03:59 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on KTTH 770AM

"Diego, California. William you're on the Medved show. Hey goal happy. Columbus day. Well, thank you at your show quite a bit. I just wanted to let you know that. I do think that this judge nomination has energized at least myself, and I was never Trumper. And I've been part of a inadvertently a part of a secret semi secret. Facebook group has over one three point seven million. Wow, people involved. I was invited by invitation only pantsuit nation. And. I get like a sociologist I get privy to all conversations and chats and today the threat is about you know, anyone can post, but you know, some are quite eloquent. And today was about what kind of protests should we do now? And I mean, there are hundreds if not thousands of comments, and it's you would find it fascinating. Because you are a study of right here. Here's my my partial response to that. And I think one of the reasons that for people like yourself. Who have had severe doubts about President Trump? This does bring Republicans together because the point is if they're gonna go after Brad Kavanagh he is about as mainstream. He's not somebody who's out there, and we had a fairly distinguished lawyer at our art our table who had been part of the Ted Cruz campaign, and it was at our table over the Sabbath, and he pointed out that if you look at the names on that Heritage Foundation list Brett Cavanaugh was the most moderate person he could have possibly picked if you look at his judicial record. He is not someone on the extreme right at all. He is down the line like Samuel Alito like Antonin Scalia. He is a mainstream normal, very distinguished conservative. So if they are going to make him a victim of this kind of character assassination do with anybody. They do it to you. I feel like as a conservative, and the reason I wasn't never Trumpers mainly because I wanted to conserve conservatism for the long run. I was playing the long game. Right. And I think you too which really attracts me to your show. Thank them. I've even kind of slightly distance myself from Prager only because he's so gung ho. Okay. Go ahead. Go ahead. You're gonna run out of time here. All I wanted to say is I think your voice is awesome. And I I need you to give us more tangible things to do in the next thirty days less than thirty days. Well, one of the one of them is in in California vote and vote Republican. I mean, it's such a shame that there's no way to vote against a Dianne Feinstein except for voting for a real crazy. Kevin de Leon because the two people running for Senate in California who cleared the primary or both Democrats, but go out and vote for governor Cox it I know that's big long shot, but there are congressional races. There congressional races in San Diego County that actually are going to help determine the composition of the house of representatives. And I would just urge people and urge everyone in your friendship, circle or acquaintance circle. If if you want this kind of bitterness in this kind of hysteria to continue. You then vote democratic because they've already announced they're going to go after trying to impeach Brad Kavanagh if you want to vote for that. Well, good luck to you. But meanwhile, most Americans are normal and healthy. He will be right back at appreciate your call. William my pillow is now offering a special deal buy one get one free. Go to mypillow dot com. Use the.

Brad Kavanagh California Antonin Scalia William Diego Facebook Medved Dianne Feinstein Samuel Alito Prager San Diego County Ted Cruz Kevin de Leon President Brett Cavanaugh Heritage Foundation Trump Senate thirty days
"antonin scalia" Discussed on Two Broads Talking Politics

Two Broads Talking Politics

04:08 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on Two Broads Talking Politics

"And protect public health and safety at the same time because my view was at one of the fundamental roles of government is to protect public health and safety. I mean, the talks about that in the constitution talks about the preamble to the declaration, all those things general welfare and health and well. Be life and happiness. And I think there are some places where commonsense will work. I think background checks, universal background checks, make sense. You know, for example, I think twenty two percent or somewhere in that city of guns are purchased without background checks. You know, twenty two percent of people could drive a car without saying, you drivers getting a driver's license. There'd be carnage on the highways and nobody would accept that. So I think it's reasonable for us for us to expect to do the to do that with with firearms age-limit as well. You know, when we bought our children, their first rifles, you know, they didn't go out at fourteen or eleven, or twelve and buy them themselves. Mom and dad did it for them. We made sure that they were locked up safely. We make sure that they were responsible and took, you know, hunter, safety, and I think there should be limits on what age people can can buy firearms and kind of training that you should have. So it's just sort of common sense stuff that we do here, Wyoming, and that I think people around the country can. In sort of maybe take some hints from. But by the same token, you know, it's pretty clear that you're not allowed to own a nuclear weapon or shoulder-fired stinger missile. There are limits on the second amendment. You know, Antonin Scalia in his decision in the case, Hella versity see where they were. Basically, he wrote for the first time ever in the history of our country that there was an explicit individual right to bear arms. He wrote about the fact that there were limitations on on the second amendment just like there are all the other Bill of rights amendment and that certain weapons were probably not appropriate certain military weapons. And you know what? He's a pretty conservative guy, but I don't disagree with in there. So I think we can do about Celinda issues that you know also on your website is about the internet in net neutrality, and I believe I read that you had at one point been the CFO of an internet service provider. And so I, I wonder if you could sort of talk us through a little bit about. This issue of net neutrality and its importance, and you know what you bring coming from the background in that industry to, you know, thinking about those issues. Yep. I was the photo of an co-founder of an internet service provider back in the in the early days kind of dial up and DSL and when a lot of things we're changing and you know, the internet is really important to us here in Wyoming because when geographically challenged and I mean that in the sense that we have a lot of rural communities that are far away from from anywhere else. So you know, Intel is not gonna come into buffalo Wyoming or Sheridan Wyoming and build a us manufacturing plant for computer chips. For example, if we don't have the infrastructure, we don't have the employment base. It's just not gonna happen. But if you do go to buffalo Wyoming, I visited not that long ago, a company, a mom and pop, you know, a couple that had started an organic baby clothing company, and they sourced organic cotton and organic fibers. And they had the materials made into baby clothes, and then they ship them. And they took orders and they did it all over the internet. And I think in Wyoming, especially but across the country, the ability to do an incredible amount of things from a business perspective or what you guys are doing with podcast or you name it is critically important is when forward into the future, it's important to our, it's important our our ability to talk with each other. And so your BIC witness broadband I think is is an assessing. And I think that it's gotten to the point where it's much like landlines in terms of the utility that they bring and the way they should probably, frankly, be regulated in the sense that what we don't want I think is we don't want incredibly large corporations like that..

Wyoming Antonin Scalia Sheridan Wyoming Intel CFO co-founder twenty two percent
"antonin scalia" Discussed on KLIF 570 AM

KLIF 570 AM

04:08 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on KLIF 570 AM

"She would be a bad commander in chief. So I might have to move to Australia. But no, she would not be ordering someone directly or indirectly to to take me out happily week. I don't know about that. I don't know about that one. All right. Well, well, well, well that one aside I would just not want the country to have the policies, including the judges. So Hillary Clinton would appoint they agenda would be carrying on. So I will be political at this stage. I am a Republican. I'm proud to be a Republican land of Lincoln kind of person. So to speak, even though from Texas. So I I would be very sorrowful or who would have filled the seat on the supreme court of the United States. That's the key moment right there. The last two months. Yep. So the election of Donald Trump help preserve a constitutional or traditional court doesn't just make up rules of the constitution or hose them in his dissent and the same sex marriage case. Justice Antonin Scalia and one of his last writings on the policy issue. I don't have strong feelings about the whole issue of same sex marriage. You know, different people twenty set they said, but I care deeply about who decides that question. Tanabe divided by five lawyers on the supreme court. Now, lastly, Ken Starr, you've had some comments about the behavior of our current president Forty-five Donald J Trump in his comments about Jeff Sessions which undermines the rule of law. Gimme opined for a moment or two about this president's behavior. Trump chore. Jeff sessions. We'll happily the president's behavior, which I have a seriously and strongly criticized doesn't cross the line into criminality. And that's the key distinction. But I wish he would stop it. I think he's hurting himself. I think he's hurting the country. I may agree with eighty percent of his policies. Maybe eighty five percent of his policies. I've agreed with every one of his appointments to the to the federal bench. Every single one has spent a strong opponent of appointment, but he's killing himself politically with this small-minded Ness, a criticizing John McCain all the peace with if you're not serving my interest. Then you're not on my team. And that's how something attorney general is supposed to be the attorney general is supposed to stand for the rule of law. No, fear. No favor, and our president just doesn't get that. So I hope and pray that there will be. Some road to Damascus experience that says to him because I know people do say to him don't do this issue on you are elected to be the president to faithfully enforce the law, please be true to that sacred obligation. That's more just is grazing spent on so many policies. I don't agree with everything he does. But overwhelmingly. He has done and look at the economy and all that do. What he's been doing very good work. He just needs to change his tune. That's it name of the book is contempt. A memoir of the Clinton investigation. Ken Starr, and his print Cavanaugh said about nineteen years ago about you doing the right thing doing the hard thing doing it, very well enduring the attacks Ken Starr taught us in our office. What it means to be the man in the arena you've been there for about thirty to forty years and Ken Starr, may you live long and prosper. Well, thank you Bill. God bless you. And keep up the bright work. God bless America. Ken starr? Thank you very much. All right. Let's continue with more. Wow. I wish I had him on twenty years ago. Let's.

Ken Starr president Donald J Trump supreme court Hillary Clinton Justice Antonin Scalia Australia Texas Lincoln John McCain United States attorney America Damascus Cavanaugh eighty five percent eighty percent nineteen years twenty years
"antonin scalia" Discussed on KSRO

KSRO

09:52 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on KSRO

"Three nine thousand six twenty four that's the number if you want. To take part in this show I don't really want to do too, much, in the way of politics today Right but tomorrow So we have to kind of. Start here tomorrow the confirmation process for judge Cavanaugh. To become Justice cavenaugh. Will be gin and how do? I know that we'll know that because my home state is is Iowa and the chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee is of course Senator Chuck Grassley who. Is from Iowa so we get to know what he's gonna do almost, before he does but he certainly, tells us very very quickly here in Iowa and h us that tomorrow it will, begin roughly speaking a three to four week process before judge. Cavenaugh is confirmed he believes he will be confirmed as Justice cavenaugh on the supreme court of the United, States is very very important is very important for a, number of reasons not least of which ladies and gentlemen is he's actually a better replacement, for? Antonin Scalia The Neal Gorsuch was now, Gorsuch is a good conservative judge don't get me wrong but that might be the problem See I have a problem With conservative judges I have. A problem with liberal judges I don't want that to. Be conservative or liberal judges I just. Won't let it be judges this surely should be one of the. Easiest, gigs in the country Here's my issue here's the United States constitution. Does my issue stand up against the. Constitution Antonin Scalia walls and originalist he was someone that. That very seriously he didn't mind who. He upset not for a second did he mind who he upset I believe, Cavanaugh is made of. The same stuff he's an originalist And we need that I would love there to be nine of, those on the supreme court, of, the United States by the way a little. Side all look squirrel little side alley here was are awful thing the other day we were told. So. Many people in our country couldn't name a single. Supreme court Justice Man one indictment of our education system I mean seriously one indictment -cation, system yes wow Anyway sorry I digress a. Back from? Shiny. Thing So we will theoretically. In, three to four weeks we will have And. You Justice on the supreme court and it will, be Justice Cavanaugh I believe we will, be a better nation for it Almost everyone except Barack Obama. Would have been unacceptable to anyone of the liberal persuasion That, too is an indictment of our society it wasn't that many years ago you know That there are there were plenty, of couples out there who disagreed. Politically and who loved each other. Without question The biggest decision they ever had to make on election day. Was should we go and cancel each other out or should we just stay home and cut I like the ones that stayed home and cuddle to be, honest with you even though I'm a big? Believer in everybody who can vote should folk Opposite political persuasion I think that's a reasonable compensation to have Now these days we are people only say, guy couldn't even date somebody who believe differently. Politically to me I could by the way I could do that I, have many friends who still Who are of. The opposite political persuasion. I'm not Republican by the way I've. Never been Republican I do not attach label to. Myself I've never voted straight ticket in. My entire life not one time I'm pretty sure what. We do that in. November either so my record will continue. I'm proudly independent I am a conservative but I, am proudly independent We don't do I don't. Do right and left I do right and wrong which. Is almost a cliche now. When you say. That but I absolutely, mean it absolutely made it Anyway This is a two. Way radio would love to know what you think about all of eight hundred three eight three ninety six twenty four eight hundred three eight three nine thousand six twenty. Four you're going to see some showboat and tomorrow I assure you of that Because you know the the first thing you gotta get is you gotta get all the all the members of the committee all of. Them they get to make an opening statement we get to your own We could predict the opening statements right now I believe when that start or maybe it's when the, Grassley and Feinstein. When they finished and before the other, committee members do this anyway He cavenaugh he will make his. Opening statement as well, theoretically more I think happens tomorrow it's. Such a boring process that it's almost like we don't care because these opening statements just. For hometown, or home party consumption. So they. Are they they actually add nothing to. The process not a single thing will be added to, the process, by these opening. Statements on Justice so sorry getting ahead of. Myself excuse me judge Cavanaugh hopefully soon to be Justice Cavanaugh not one thing is added to the conversation bodies opening statements not a thing Do we, want a Justice On, judge Cavin also statement. Yeah I think. We do we want that do I need? Grassley, and Feinstein's opening statement no we could. Almost writes it right now we. Could say it right now I could. Probably annot Joe's love parody IKEA probably. Perry poverty them right now Because we know they're going to say. They, had nothing this thing should be The The person to be confirmed their opening statement followed by five minutes of questioning from each member of the. Committee Break for lunch Come back everyone all the members of committee get another two minutes for any, follow up questions and that should be done. In a day then they can submit. Some written questions he can answer the written questions and then they should vote That's how it should be But these old processes I. Mean it's just it's. Remarkable it really is remarkable eight hundred three eight three ninety six twenty four eight hundred three eight. Three ninety six. Twenty four by the way don't forget to follow me on. Twitter at Simon radio seventeen, seventy six at Simon radio seventeen seventy six love having you on my. Social media accounts as well so that is a cavenaugh that starts tomorrow if you want to weigh in on that eight hundred three eighty three ninety six twenty four eight hundred three eight three nine. Hundred ninety six twenty. Four we got plenty more we're going to focus largely on a societal matters today. As opposed to political matters I am going to when we come back. From this quick time out I'm gonna talk about general David Patrice because David portrayals has now taken on what he calls the sacred obligation that's in. Quotes to help burn veterans We were still using burn pits as recently as June this year this is the new Agent Orange We have veterans who are. Getting very sick because of their proximity to burn pits. The military the department of defense. Is denying it has been that. Has anything to do with anything That's why as, recently as June was still using burn pits, while Davey portrays is getting involved now. We can talk about that when we come back from this quick time out and also after that after we get through, bottom of the hour we're going to talk to Cody Wilson. Cody Wilson is the guy that was stopped by a federal judge. From putting the blueprints to his three d. gun online but. He thinks he's found a. Way around, that core order we're going to, talk to him alive on the Joe. Pags show we. Are across. This nation on some truly incredible radio stations thank you for being there of course. We're on, your iheart radio app and we. Are at joepags dot com join the conversation I'm Simon I'm in for joepags and this. Is the Joe. Pags show Have.

Justice Cavanaugh Justice cavenaugh Senator Chuck Grassley Antonin Scalia Iowa United States Simon Justice Man Senate Judiciary committee Feinstein Cody Wilson Neal Gorsuch joepags department of defense chairman Barack Obama Twitter Joe David Patrice
"antonin scalia" Discussed on Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick

Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick

02:42 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick

"Rick just for some commemorative. This is a family is a family, don't do it. So I wanted to ask you a ridiculously fanciful question that occurred to me while I was reading, you're really, really marvelous book. And if it's too fanciful, just say, you can say the f. word Dalia, but what do you think Antonin Scalia would think of President Donald Trump. So we do have a little bit of information about that because there's another book that came out recently by Brian garner who's a language guru and friend of Scalia co, author of a book called reading law, which is kind of like a recipe book for stetch to interpretation. And he said that Scalia was intrigued by Trump, and we know that. Scully as widow had Trump signs out on her lawn. So you know, I think there'd be some things that Trump has done, which would be abhorrent to Scalia, but they were many ways in which he really fulfils a kind of populist nationalist vision that Scully offered. So could you separate Trumpism from Trump, he'd probably fairly happy with a lot of Trumpism. Maybe not so happy with Trump the person and the, you know, if you think about one of his last dissents in a case involving Arizona's immigration law. The quotes from that about hordes of immigrants coming over the border in taking Americans jobs and threatening violence. It really could have come out of Trump's mouth and said, there were a lot of things that they had in common. School was very strong for the death penalty believed that enemy combatants who are not American citizens were really not entitled to very much protection under the constitution. He was against expansion of rights for people. In many ways, his program was Trumpian program, even if he might have found Donald Trump to be repulsive. In certain ways, rate Cassen is Fisher of law and political science at the university of California Irvine school of law. His book is the Justice of contradictions Antonin Scalia and the politics of disruption and his election law blog is a must read all the time, Rick. Thank you. It's always have you on the show to explain the oppression in gerrymandering. It is nice to have you here to explain the inscrutable Justice Antonin Scalia thank you for joining us for. And that about wraps it up for this Scalia edition of amicus. Thank you so much for listening in. If you.

Donald Trump Justice Antonin Scalia Rick university of California Irvin Scully Brian garner Trumpism Dalia Arizona President Cassen
"antonin scalia" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

KTLK 1130 AM

05:21 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on KTLK 1130 AM

"Is the thing democrats will never get about people like brent cabinet the people like antonin scalia or the people like neil gorsuch clarence thomas they will never ever understand this and what it is is that they have no reason to fear brett kavanagh's politics brad kavanagh is not in politics clarence thomas is not in politics kaleo is not in politics but the left considers the judiciary to be just another branch of politics and in fact it infallible branch that's how the left looks at the judiciary as the last line of defense and the final authority in politics because that's what they have made it they have bastardized courts they have bestard is the law and turned it into a branch of politics brad kavanagh is going to interpret the constitution without a political filter as did scalia as does justice thomas as does neil gorsuch this is what they cannot understand in truth they should be wildly grateful for the fact that kavanagh's politics are not going to be a factor here but they can't imagine anyone doing that since they never would they would never put their politics aside in fact when it comes to politics the left has litmus tests and if they're nominees do not pass these litmus test there's no way they're going to get any court appointment us district court judge appellate court judge supreme court justice not going to happen unless they check off the right political boxes and i'm i'm dead serious they've got nothing to fear from brett kavanagh's politics because that's not what he does cavanaugh is a strict they call the word is construction meaning he believes in the original intent and the way the constitution was constructed and written all talk about his politics especially this guy this is what makes him a great george all the talk about his politics is moot in all of the left's objections are going to be with the constitution previous rulings black leather the law not with his politics which will not even enter into it oh that's what they should go into any if they looked at his jurisprudence there's no way to disqualify the guy if you look at this man as a judge of the law purely as a judge of the law a man able to see the law rather than publish no reason to disqualifying the left is not gonna look at him that way the left is going to attempt to destroy him on the basis of his politics which you're not even a factor here but they utilize projection and so since they have politicized everything they assume we do too but we have not corrupted the courts well you know i can't say we have i mean lifetime of history we've had some bad actors no question but as a matter of principle we're not about corrupting the courts the left is about corrupting pretty much everything they can that has to do with the constitution which is why i made the point of telling vice president pence little less than an hour ago that the left is really not protesting or upset with cavanaugh they're upset with the constitution here their beef is with the constitution cavanaugh as a strict interpreter of it poses a great threat to them because liberalism requires the constitution be bendable shape able flake able to accommodate whatever policy positions they have of the moment now the left is also scared to death of the next potential nomination and let's just say this they're scared to death of the future of ruth buzzy ginsburg justice ginsburg has been in poor health justice ginsburg is over eighty and you don't need my word to tell you to convince you that they're scared to death you know they all realize let's talk about obama and hillary how brilliant they are really this is how bright they are is this how strategically bright and formidable they are if they had known what they were doing they would have cajoled ruth ghazi bins berg into retiring while obama was prek seed so that he could name her appointment and have that seat guaranteed for the democrats in the next forty years what they calculated that there was no way hillary could lose it didn't even occur to them donald trump would win it never occurred to them that a republican might have a chance to appoint the next couple of justices or three they assumed that that would be their exclusive right.

brent cabinet antonin scalia neil clarence thomas forty years
"antonin scalia" Discussed on KMOX News Radio 1120

KMOX News Radio 1120

05:21 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on KMOX News Radio 1120

"Is the thing the democrats will never get about people like brent capital the people like antonin scalia or the people like neil gorsuch clarence thomas they will never ever understand this and what it is is that they have no reason to fear bread kavanagh's politics bread kavanagh is not in politics clarence thomas is not in politics scalia was not in politics but the left considers the judiciary to be just another branch of politics and in fact it infallible branch that's how the left looks at the judiciary as the last line of defense and the final authority in politics because that's what they have made it they have bastardized courts they have bestard is the law and turned it into a branch of politics brad kavanagh is going to interpret the constitution without a political filter as did scalia as does justice thomas as does neil gorsuch this is what they cannot understand in truth they should be wildly grateful for the fact that kavanagh's politics are not going to be a factor here but they can't imagine anyone doing that since they never would they would never put their politics aside in fact when it comes to politics the left has litmus tests and if they're nominees do not pass these litmus test there's no way they're going to get any court appointment us district court judge appellate court judge supreme court justice not going to happen unless they check off the right political boxes and i'm serious they've got nothing to fear from bread kavanagh's politics because that's not what he does cavanaugh is a strict they call the word is construction est meaning he believes in the original intent and the way the constitution was constructed and written all talk about his politics especially this guy this is what makes a great judge all the talk about his politics is moot in all of the left's objections are going to be with the constitution previous rulings black leather in the law not with his politics which will not even enter into it well that's what they should go into any if they looked at his jurisprudence there's no way to disqualify the guy if you look at this man as a just of the law purely as a judge of the law a man able to see the law rather than publish no reason to disqualify the left is not going to look at it that way the left is going to attempt to destroy him on the basis of his politics which you're not even a factor here but they utilize projection and so since they have politicized everything they assume we do too but we have not corrupted the courts well you know i can't say we have i mean lifetime of history we've had some bad actors no question but as a matter of principle we're not about corrupting the courts the left is about corrupting pretty much everything they can that has to do with the constitution which is why i made the point of telling vice president pence little less than an hour ago that the left is really not protesting or upset with kavanagh they're upset with the constitution here their beef is with the constitution cavanaugh as a strict interpreter of it poses a great threat to them because liberalism requires the constitution be bendable shape able flake formidable to accommodate whatever policy positions they have of the moment now the left is also scared to death of the next potential nomination and let's just say this they're scared to death of the future of ruth buzzy ginsburg justice ginsburg has been in poor health justice ginsburg is over eighty and you don't need my word to tell you to convince you that they're scared to death you know they all realize let's talk about obama and hillary how brilliant they are really this is how bright they are how this is how strategically bright and formidable they are if they had known what they were doing they would have cajoled ruth ghazi bensburg into retiring while obama was proxy so that he could name her appointment and have that seat guaranteed for the democrats the next forty years what they calculated that there was no way he'll rica lose it didn't even occur to them donald trump would win it never occurred to them that a republican might have a chance to appoint the next couple of justices or three they assumed that that would be their exclusive right.

brent capital antonin scalia neil clarence thomas forty years
"antonin scalia" Discussed on News Radio WGOW

News Radio WGOW

05:19 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on News Radio WGOW

"Is the thing the democrats will never get about people like brent capital the people like antonin scalia or the people like neil gorsuch clarence thomas they will never ever understand this and what it is is that they have no reason to fear bread kavanagh's politics bread kavanagh is not in politics clarence thomas is not in politics kaleo was not in politics but the left considers the judiciary to be just another branch of politics and in fact it infallible branch that's how the left looks at the judiciary as the last line of defense and the final authority in politics because that's what they have made it they have bastardized courts they have bestard is the law and turned it into a branch of politics rent cavanaugh is going to interpret the constitution without a political filter as did scalia as does justice thomas as does neil gorsuch this is what they cannot understand in truth they should be wildly grateful for the fact that kavanagh's politics are not going to be a factor here but they can't imagine anyone doing that since they never would they would never put their politics aside in fact when it comes to politics the left has litmus tests and if they're nominees do not pass these litmus test there's no way they're going to get any court appointment u s district court judge appellate court judge supreme court justice not going to happen unless they check off the right political boxes and i'm i'm dead serious they've got nothing to fear from brett kavanagh's politics because that's not what he does cavanaugh is a strict they call the word is construction est meaning he believes in the original intent and the way the constitution was constructed and written all talk about his politics especially this guy this is what makes him a great judge all the talk about his politics is moot in all of the left's objections are going to be with the constitution previous rulings black letter of the law not with his politics which will not even ever into it that's what they should go into and if they looked at his jurisprudence there's no way to disqualify the guy if you look at this man as a judge of the law purely as a judge of the law a man able to see the law rather than publish no reason to disqualify the left is not going to look at it that way the left is going to attempt to destroy him on the basis of his politics which are not even a factor here but they utilize projection and so since they have politicized everything they assume we do too but we have not corrupted the courts well you know i can't say we haven't i mean lifetime of history we've had some bad actors no question but as a matter of principle we're not about corrupting the courts the left is about corrupting pretty much everything they can that has to do with the constitution which is why i made the point of telling vice president pence little less than an hour ago that the left is really not protesting or upset with kavanagh they're upset with the constitution here their beef is with the constitution cavenaugh as a strict interpreter of it poses a great threat to them because liberalism requires the constitution be bendable shape able flavorful formidable to accommodate whatever policy positions they have of the moment now the left is also scared to death of the next potential nomination and let's just say this they're scared to death of the future of ruth buzzy ginsburg justice ginsburg has been in poor health justice ginsburg is over eighty and you don't need my word to tell you to convince you that they're scared to death you know they all realize let's talk about obama and hillary how brilliant they are really this is how bright they are is how strategic leave bright and formidable they are if they had known what they were doing they would have cajoled ruth ghazi bins berg into retiring while obama was proxy so that he could name her appointment and have that seat guaranteed for the democrats for the next forty years what they calculated that there was no way hillary could lose it didn't even occur to them donald trump would win it never occurred to them that a republican might have a chance to appoint the next couple of justices or three they assumed that that would be.

brent capital antonin scalia neil clarence thomas forty years
"antonin scalia" Discussed on KOA 850 AM

KOA 850 AM

05:21 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on KOA 850 AM

"Is the thing the democrats will never get about people like brent cabinet the people like antonin scalia or the people like neil gorsuch clarence thomas they will never ever understand this and what it is is that they have no reason to fear brent kavanagh's politics brad kavanagh is not in politics clarence thomas is not in politics scalia was not in politics but the left considers the judiciary to be just another branch of politics and in fact that infallible branch that's how the left looks at the judiciary as the last line of defense and the final authority in politics because that's what they have made it they have bastardized courts they have bestard is the law and turned it into a branch of politics brad kavanagh is going to interpret the constitution without a political filter as did scalia as does justice thomas as does neil gorsuch this is what they cannot understand in truth they should be wildly grateful for the fact that kavanagh's politics are not going to be a factor here but they can't imagine anyone doing that since they never would they would never put their politics aside in fact when it comes to politics the left has litmus tests and if they're nominees do not pass these litmus test there's no way they're going to get any court appointment us district court judge appellate court judge supreme court justice not going to happen unless they check off the right political boxes and i'm i'm dead serious they've got nothing to fear from brett kavanagh's politics because that's not what he does cavanaugh is a strict they call the word is construction est meaning he believes in the original intent and the way the constitution was constructed and written all the talk about his politics especially this guy this is what makes a great judge all the talk about his politics is moot in all of the left's objections are going to be with the constitution previous rulings black leather in the law not with his politics which will not even enter into it that's what they should go into any if they looked at his jurisprudence there's no way to disqualify the guy if you look at this man as a judge of the law purely as a judge of the law a man able to see the law rather than publish no reason to disqualify the left is not going to look at it that way the left is going to attempt to destroy him on the basis of his politics which are not even a factor here but they utilize projection and so since they have politicized everything they assume we do too but we have not corrupted the courts well you know i can't say we haven't i mean lifetime of history we've had some bad actors no questions but as a matter of principle we're not about corrupting the courts the left is about corrupting pretty much everything they can that has to do with the constitution which is why i made the point of telling vice president pence little less than an hour ago that the left is really not protesting or upset with cavanaugh they're upset with the constitution here their beef is with the constitution cavanaugh as a strict interpreter of it poses a great threat to them because liberalism requires the constitution be bendable shape able flavorful formidable to accommodate whatever policy positions they have of the moment now the left is also scared to death of the next potential nomination and let's just say this they're scared to death of the future of ruth buzzy ginsburg justice ginsburg has been in poor health justice ginsburg is over eighty and you don't need my word to tell you to convince you that they're scared to death you know they all realize let's talk about obama and hillary how brilliant they are really this is how bright they are this is how strategically bright and formidable they are if they had known what they were doing they would've cajoled ruth ghazi bins berg into retiring while obama was proxy so that he could name her appointment and have that seat guaranteed for the democrats in the next forty years what they calculated that there was no way hillary could lose it didn't even occur to them donald trump would win it never occurred to them that a republican might have a chance to appoint the next couple of justices or three they assumed that that would be their exclusive right.

brent cabinet antonin scalia neil clarence thomas forty years
"antonin scalia" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

106.1 FM WTKK

05:25 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on 106.1 FM WTKK

"Interesting observation here's the thing the democrats will never get about people like brent cabinet people like antonin scalia or the people like neil gorsuch clarence thomas they will never ever understand this and what it is is that they have no reason to fear bread kavanagh's politics brad kavanagh is not in politics clarence thomas is not in politics scalia was not in politics but the left considers the judiciary to be just another branch of politics and in fact it infallible branch that's how the left looks at the judiciary as the last line of defense and the final authority in politics because that's what they have made it they have bastardized courts they have bestard is no law and turned it into a branch of politics brad kavanagh is going to interpret the constitution without a political filter as did scalia as does justice thomas as does neil gorsuch this is what they cannot understand in truth they should be wildly grateful for the fact that kavanagh's politics are not going to be a factor here but they can't imagine anyone doing that since they never would they would never put their politics aside in fact when it comes to politics the left has litmus tests and if they're nominees do not pass these litmus test there's no way they're going to get any court appointment us district court judge appellate court judge supreme court justice not going to happen unless they check off the right political boxes and i'm i'm dead serious they've got nothing to fear from brett kavanagh's politics because that's not what he does cavanaugh is a strict they call the word is construction est meaning he believes in the original intent and the way the constitution was constructed and written all talk about his politics especially this guy this is what makes him a great judge all the talk about his politics is moot in all of the left's objections are going to be with the constitution previous rulings black letter of the law not with his politics which will not even enter into it well that's what they should go into and if they looked at his jurisprudence there's no way to disqualify the guy if you look at this man as a judge of the law purely as a judge of the law a man able to see the law rather than there's no reason to disqualify the left is not gonna look at it that way the left is going to attempt to destroy him on the basis of his politics which you're not even a factor here but they utilize projection and so since they have politicized everything they assume we do too but we have not corrupted the courts well you know i can't say we haven't i mean lifetime of history we've had some bad actors no question but as a matter of principle we're not about corrupting the courts the left is about corrupting pretty much everything they can that has to do with the constitution which is why i made the point of telling vice president pence little less than an hour ago that the left is really not protesting or upset with cavanaugh they're upset with the constitution here their beef is with the constitution cavanaugh as a strict interpreter of it poses a great threat to them because liberalism requires the constitution be bendable shape able flake formidable to accommodate whatever policy positions they have of the moment now the left is also scared to death of the next potential nomination and let's just say this they're scared to death of the future of ruth buzzy ginsburg justice ginsburg has been in poor health justice ginsburg is over eighty and you don't need my word to tell you to convince you that they're scared to death you know they all realize let's talk about obama and hillary how brilliant they are really this is how bright they are this is how strategically bright and formidable they are if they had known what they were doing they would've cajoled ruth ghazi bensburg into retiring while obama was presi so that he could name her appointment and have that seat guaranteed for the democrats in the next forty years what they calculated that there was no way hillary can lose it didn't even occur to them donald trump would win it never occurred to them that a republican might have a chance to appoint the next couple of justices or three they assumed that that would be their exclusive right.

antonin scalia brent cabinet neil clarence thomas forty years
"antonin scalia" Discussed on KQED Radio

KQED Radio

03:28 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on KQED Radio

"The book the justice of contradiction antonin scalia and the politics of disruption in theory the latest news on affirmative action changes nothing laws affecting diversity in schools remained the same here's what has changed president obama's administration offered advice on how to work for racial diversity within the law president trump's administration just withdrew that guidance npr's rachel gotbaum reports after two supreme court rulings on how race could be used in college admissions the obama administration issued guidance to schools on how to diversify their student population but on tuesday attorney general jeff sessions announced that this administration would rescind that guidance vanita gupta ran the civil rights division at the justice department under obama she says the guidance clarified the law the two thousand eleven and two thousand sixteen guidances really just underscore the federal government's commitment to diversity in higher education and said that schools can use race as one factor among others in determining how to have diversity body the current administration clearly disagrees and calls the guidance outdated an inconsistent with current law but civil rights groups say the move actually sets the country back derrick johnson runs the n double acp it is true that this administration is seeking to make america great again by turning america back to nineteen fifties reality but some groups say they've lost ground because of the obama era policy yukon zhao was president of the asian american coalition for education he says college admissions for asian americans have been capped for many years and that needs to change i think it's a new chips for asia mexican children because the from today is that discrimination you know the unlawful discrimination against outshooting would be significantly few showers group and others have issued complaints with the department of justice against several ivy league schools and say they have been urging the trump administration to do away with obama's admissions guidance in june plaintiffs in a lawsuit against harvard say they found patterns of discrimination in the schools admissions process despite the trump administration's reversal on guiding colleges to consider race in admissions those that support affirmative action say they will continue to work to diversify college campuses we intend to proceed without asking anyone's permission lily eskillson garcia is president of the national education association we can work directly with higher education we can work directly even with state legislators here's the thing we're going to do do what's right for students no matter what with justice anthony kennedy about to retire civil rights groups worry that i'm more conservative court could do away with affirmative action altogether for npr news i'm rachel gotbaum and this afternoon on all things considered an all republican congressional delegation visits russia tell your smart speaker to play npr or your local member station by name this is npr news all things considered at four thirty.

anthony kennedy russia eskillson garcia asia yukon america attorney npr rachel gotbaum antonin scalia harvard asian american coalition president derrick johnson vanita gupta jeff sessions obama administration trump obama
"antonin scalia" Discussed on 710 WOR

710 WOR

05:43 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on 710 WOR

"Says that the late justice anthony antonin scalia told him that kennedy told scalia that he wasn't gonna retire until there was a republican president okay we have a republican president kennedy is retiring he must be okay with trump that's got him spinning in in in tops as well it is i have to tell you it's fun to watch this frankly i mean i've i've gotten i've gotten a little bit beyond where the stuff irritated does but but i now see the humor in a lot of this because we're dealing with with i mean closed minded sheer stupidity comedy central writer i wish justice kennedy had been shot instead of jfk or robert what's this clown's name curtis cook a los angeles based writer for comedy central you think they're rethinking hi is this is this funny oh and trevor noah who also works there he had something crazy to say in some ways it feels like all hope is dead so you're tuning into the comedy central network to watch what you think is jon stewart he got other long ago he can see what's coming is replacement where you go to laugh as just told you that all hope is dead why because a judge retired so the investment they have made in the supreme court becoming the final arbiter it was it was always destined to come back and bite them it's gonna come back and bite everybody on both sides depending on rulings and dan rather dan rather also tweeted out dan rather of course as a news man he was the anchor for cbs evening news after walter klondike retired and dan rather eventually had to retire himself because he got caught making up the news about george hw george w bush in a national guards i mean actually used forged documents is she well maybe the documents were forged but the story is accurate right my source material may be faked but the story is real anyway they get rid of rather at cbs i've got no choice peter jennings and tom brokaw immediately recognizing the potential danger here to all of journalism created new award a lifetime award for great news presents or some such thing and they have a big dinner and they give rather the award to save liberalism and the save the news business so ra rather tweeted yesterday afternoon justice kennedy retiring if you're deeply disturbed absorb the shock but respond with even more determination if you see this as a fight for the future of democracy let those in power know that the will of the majority can still hold sway earth today this is the majority holding sway trump won the election the republicans won the house the republicans won the senate they get to choose because they are the majority just like people have forgotten i think obama nominated elena kagan perhaps one of the least qualified people to sit on any court much less the supreme court he nominated her during the year of a midterm election and nobody said he shouldn't have been able to do it nobody said he should have to wait till after the election when obama nominated somebody to the court most people's okay okay first african american president whatever you want you can have it we're not racist and that's how much of the obama years happened there was no opposition to it now i have a question for dan rather if you're deeply disturbed absorb the shock can you tell them how to do it dan because it doesn't look like they know morgan freeman is not absorbing the shock the comedy central guy who wishes that anthony kennedy had been shot instead of president kennedy i think they're having trouble absorbing the shock you've been through this dan how do they do it second thing is respond with even more determination what's that but he explained his respond with more determination to do what what is that look like dan what does responding with more determination look like i mean does asking what would it be what are these people not doing that dan thinks they need to do well they're not absorbing the shock and i don't know how they could be more determined competent and qualified to figure all this out onto oppose it's another thing but i think they are determined so there's that in my prediction yesterday has already country came true much as i thought it would before the end of the day yesterday and it is come over and over and over again throughout the drive by media so we'll have the audio evidence of all of that coming up when we get back america's.

anthony antonin scalia kennedy president
"antonin scalia" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

Newsradio 970 WFLA

05:41 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on Newsradio 970 WFLA

"Says that the late justice anthony antonin scalia told him that kennedy told scalia that he wasn't gonna retire until there was a republican president okay we have a republican president kennedy is retiring he must be okay with trump that's got him spinning in in in tops as well and it is i have to tell you it's fun to watch this frankly i mean i've i've gotten i've gotten a little bit beyond where the stuff irritated does but but i now see the the humor in a lot of this because we're dealing with with closed minded sheer stupidity a comedy central writer i wish justice kennedy had been shot instead of jfk or robert what's this clown's name curtis cook a los angeles based writer for comedy central you think are rethinking my high is funny oh and trevor noah who also works there he had something crazy to say in some ways it feels like all hope is dead so you're tuning into the comedy central network to watch what you think is jon stewart he got another long ago he could see what's coming his replacement where you go to laugh as just told you that all hope is dead why because a judge retired so the investment they have made in the supreme court becoming the final arbiter it was it was always destined to come back and bite them it's gonna come back and bite everybody on both sides depending on rulings and dan rather an rather also tweeted out now dan rather of course a news man he was the anchor for cbs evening news after walter klondike retired and dan rather eventually had had to retire himself because he got caught making up the news about george h w george w bush and the national guards i mean actually used forged documents is a fuse well maybe the documents were forged but the story is accurate right my source material may be faked but the story is real anyway they get rid of rather at cbs have got no choice peter jennings and tom brokaw immediately recognizing the potential danger here to all of journalism created new award a lifetime award for great news presents or some such thing and they have a big dinner and they give rather the award to save liberalism and the save the news business so re rather tweeted yesterday afternoon justice kennedy retiring if you're deeply disturbed absorb the shock but respond with even more determination if you see this as a fight for the future of democracy let those in power knows that the will of the majority can still hold sway earth to dan this is the majority holding sway trump won the election the republicans won the house the republicans won the senate they get to choose because they are the majority just like people have forgotten i think obama nominated elena kagan perhaps one of the least qualified people to sit on any court much less the supreme court he nominated her during the year of a midterm election and nobody said he shouldn't have been able to do it nobody said he should have to wait till after the election when obama nominated somebody to the court most people's okay okay first african american president whatever you want you can have it we're not racist and that's how much of the obama years happened there was no opposition to it now have a question for dan rather if you're deeply disturbed absorb the shock can you tell them how to do it dan because it doesn't look like they know morgan freeman is not absorbing the shock the comedy central guy who wishes that anthony kennedy had been shot instead of president kennedy i think they're having trouble absorbing the shock you've been through this dan how do they do it second thing is respond with even more determination what's that we explain this respond with more determination to do what what is that look like dan what does responding with more determination look like i mean i is asking what would it be what are these people not doing that dan thinks they need to do well they're not absorbing the shock and i don't know how they could be more determined competent and qualified to figure all this out to oppose it it's another thing but i think they are determined so there's that into my prediction yesterday has already come to a came true much as i thought it would before the end of the day yesterday and it is culture over and over and over again throughout the drive by media so we'll have the audio evidence of all of that coming up.

anthony antonin scalia kennedy president
"antonin scalia" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

Newsradio 1200 WOAI

05:41 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on Newsradio 1200 WOAI

"Says that the late justice anthony antonin scalia told him that kennedy told scalia he wasn't gonna retire until there was a republican president okay we have a republican president kennedy is retiring he must be okay with trump that's got him spinning in in in tops as well it is i have to tell you it's fun to watch this frankly i mean i've i've gotten i've gotten a little bit beyond where the stuff irritated it does but but i now see the humor in a lot of this because we're dealing with with i mean closed minded sheer stupidity comedy central writer i wish justice kennedy had been shot instead of jfk or robert what's this clown's name curtis cook a los angeles based writer for comedy central you think they're rethinking my high is this is this funny oh and trevor noah who also works there he had something crazy to say in some ways it feels like all hope is dead so you're tuning into the comedy central network to watch what you think is jon stewart he got other long ago he can see what's coming is replacement where you go to laugh as just told you that all hope is dead why because a judge retired so the investment they have made in the supreme court becoming the final arbiter it was it was always destined to come back and bite them it's gonna come back and bite everybody on both sides depending on rulings and dan rather dan rather also tweeted out dan rather of course is a news man he was the anchor for cbs evening news after walter klondike retired and dan rather eventually had to retire himself because he got caught making up the news about george h w george w bush national guards i mean actually used forged documents is a fuse well maybe the documents were forged but the story is accurate right my source material may be faked but the story is real anyway they get rid of rather at cbs have got no choice peter jennings and tom brokaw immediately recognizing the potential danger here to all of journalism created new award a lifetime award for great news presents or some such thing and they have a big dinner and they give rather the award to save liberalism and the save the news business so ra rather tweeted yesterday afternoon justice kennedy retiring if you're deeply disturbed absorb the shock but respond with even more determination if you see this as a fight for the future of democracy let those in power know that the will of the majority can still hold sway earth to dan this is the majority holding sway trump won the election the republicans won the house the republicans won the senate they get to choose because they are the majority just like people have forgotten i think obama nominated elena kagan perhaps one of the least qualified people to sit on any court much less the supreme court he nominated her during the year of a midterm election and nobody said he shouldn't have been able to do it nobody said he should have to wait till after the election when obama nominated somebody to the court most people's okay okay first african american president whatever you want you can have it we're not racist and that's how much of the obama years happened there was no opposition to it now i have a question for dan rather if you're deeply disturbed absorb the shock can you tell them how to do it dan because it doesn't look like they know morgan freeman is not absorbing the shock the comedy central guy who wishes that anthony kennedy had been shot instead of president kennedy i think they're having trouble absorbing the shock you've been through this dan how do they do it second thing is respond with even more determination what's that he explained his respond with more determination to do what what is that look like dan what does responding with more determination look like is asking what would it be what are these people not doing that dan thinks they need to do well they're not absorbing the shock and i don't know how they could be more determined competent and qualified to figure all this out to oppose it's another thing but i think they are determined so there's that into my prediction yesterday has already come to came true much as i thought it would before the end of the day yesterday and it is culture over and over and over again throughout the drive by media so we'll have the audio evidence of all of that.

anthony antonin scalia kennedy president
"antonin scalia" Discussed on KOA 850 AM

KOA 850 AM

05:29 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on KOA 850 AM

"Judge napolitano they human eddie munster judge naps fox news says that the late justice anthony antonin scalia told him that kennedy told scalia that he wasn't gonna retire until there was a republican president okay we have a republican president kennedy is retiring he must be okay with trump that's got him spinning in in in tops as well it is i have to tell you it's fun to watch this frankly i mean i've i've gotten i've gotten a little bit beyond where this stuff irritated it does but but i now see the humor in a lot of this because we're dealing with with i mean closed minded sheer stupidity comedy central writer i wish justice kennedy had been shot instead of jfk or robert what's this clown's name curtis cook a los angeles based writer for comedy central you think they're rethinking hi is this is this funny oh and trevor noah who also works there he had something crazy to say in some ways it feels like all hope is dead so you're tuning into the comedy central network to watch what you think is jon stewart he got another long ago we could see what's coming his replacement where you going to laugh as just told you that all hope is dead why because a judge retired so the investment they have made in the supreme court becoming the final arbiter it was it was always destined to come back and bite them it's gonna come back and bite everybody on both sides depending on rulings and dan rather rather also tweeted out dan rather of course is a news man he was the anchor for cbs evening news after walter klondike retired and dan rather eventually had to retire himself because he got caught making up the news about george hw george w bush in a national guards i mean actually used forged documents is a sears well maybe the documents were forged but the story is accurate right my source material may be faked but the story is real anyway they get rid of rather at cbs have got no choice peter jennings and tom brokaw immediately recognizing the potential danger here to all of journalism created new award a lifetime award for great news presents or some such thing have a big dinner and they give rather the award to save liberalism and the save the news business so ra rather tweeted yesterday afternoon justice kennedy retiring if you're deeply disturbed absorb the shock but respond with even more determination if you see this as a fight for the future of democracy let those in power knows that the will of the majority can still hold sway earth the dan this is the majority holding sway trump won the election the republicans won the house the republicans won the senate they get to choose because they are the majority just like people have forgotten i think obama nominated elena kagan perhaps one of the least qualified people to sit on any court much less the supreme court he nominated her during the year of a midterm election and nobody said he shouldn't have been able to do it nobody said he should have to wait till after the election when obama nominated somebody to the court most people's okay okay first african american president whatever you want you can have it we're not racist and that's how much of the obama years happened there was no opposition to it now i have a question for dan rather if you're deeply disturbed absorb the shock can you tell them how to do it dan because it doesn't look like they know morgan freeman is not absorbing the shock to comedy central guy who wishes that anthony kennedy had been shot instead of president kennedy i think they're having trouble absorbing the shock you've been through this dan how do they do it second thing is respond with even more determination what's that we explain respond with more determination to do what what is that look like dan what does responding with more determination look like i mean i is asking what would it be what are these people not doing that dan thinks they need to do well they're not absorbing the shock and i don't know how they could be more determined competent and qualified to figure all this out to oppose it it's another thing but i think they are determined so there's that in my prediction yesterday has already come to a came true much as i thought it would before the end of the day yesterday and it has come over and over and over again throughout the drive by media so we'll have the audio evidence.

anthony antonin scalia kennedy napolitano eddie munster
"antonin scalia" Discussed on KVNT Valley News Talk

KVNT Valley News Talk

02:09 min | 2 years ago

"antonin scalia" Discussed on KVNT Valley News Talk

"Supreme court and now has a hundred and sixty vacancies on the lower courts to fill that is going to be a huge and longlasting impact and i couldn't be happy or with the way that trump is going about picking these judges it's been a really stellar crew so let's let's harken back if you will of a to a uh a year previously we knew that there was going to be an appointment to the supreme court because that seat had been open for almost a year at a judge antonin scalia justice antonin scalia had passed away in january of 2016 and there'd been a fight over whether or not the republican senate was going to allow barack obama to fill it may invoke what they called the biden rule which joe biden uh propose not once but twice 1992 in again in two thousand seven and uh and so that that seat was held open that was the big test case and i think that people were very concerned that uh donald trump was going to play go along the get along with the democratic minority the and try to find a a noncontroversial candidate i think the people in in december 2017 might remain might not recall just how concerned people were insee january of 2017 about whether or not donald trump was going to stick to his promise and go off that list that was promulgated in at believe may of 2016 in order to assuage concerns by conservatives that he wasn't going to be conservative enough in this and he stuck to that last mike list with important in the first place he didn't know what trump would do he's not a lawyer he didn't know what his philosophy we'd be but then they thought what was he gonna really stick with it and there was a lot of good reason to because we've had a lot of republicans supreme court nominees who have really gone off the real swede had you know we we've had the geordies the republican nominees and scream court for decades decades and most of them were song being liberal can't so people thought ono is this going to be just another person who's nominee nominating these judges whose simply uh are republicans from alaska and you know trump did not do that at all he we could an excellent job i think it's because he he realized he's not a lawyer.

Supreme court antonin scalia republican senate barack obama donald trump alaska joe biden ono