23 Burst results for "Amy Conybeare"

"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

The Erick Erickson Show

05:10 min | 9 months ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

"Y'all i well. I gotta tell you i told you so. You don't believe it or not. There are times where. I'm kind of in the. I told you soaking up like i'm i'm perfectly happy to point it. I was right about something. A good radio show who should be willing to do his own horn on occasion. But there's sometimes i'm just like so obvious. President biden appointed a commission to try to review the supreme court. You will recall during the campaign with the push to get. Amy conybeare it all the court the progressives right we pack the court we gotta we gotta get rid of filibuster. We packed the court and joe biden. His i'll do a commission to study it. Biden is done a commission to study it. They basically punted they agreed. You can't pack the court that it would discredit the court at a time. The court needs its credibility there. There is a concerted. Pr effort by the left to undermine credibility court in. Make it out to be able to go operation. Because you know anything. The left can't control. The left tries to destroy. The left cannot control fox news and so they're trying to destroy fox news. The left does not control this report. They're trying to therefore destroy the supreme court. The left does not do good and talk radio. They're trying to destroy talkradio anything. The left cannot control. The left tries to destroy so now that they are clearly in the minority on this regard. They're tried to destroy. The supreme court. Threw ruining its credibility and making. Its politicized along comes. Joe biden's commission and says pack is not a good idea. The we're gonna pass on that maybe term lou may be term limits. It's kind of funny to watch the left meltdown. They're really upset. They're really really upset because they're not really getting anything they want. And they presume that they are dominant in the country. And they're really not you know what the suburbs really despise crazy. The suburbs heat crazy and right now. The left in america comes across his even crazier than republicans even crazier than trump supporters. Drew supporters have been kind of out there on some stuff. Just knowledge love..

President biden Amy conybeare supreme court Joe biden fox news Biden lou america Drew
"amy conybeare" Discussed on Reasonable Doubt

Reasonable Doubt

05:04 min | 11 months ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on Reasonable Doubt

"Be an emergency. I sounds perfectly reasonable to me while you were talking. I looked it up. It was jacobson. That was cited. And i think that. I think that everyone can agree. That you know given the pandemic we've just lived through basing it off of law. That one hundred sixteen years old is just probably not the best way moving forward. We shouldn't just be referring back to that. We should kind of take a look back at what we've been through and set new standards well and like i say it surprises me that she is invoking you know. She's considered part of the people. Always say the right way. But as you and. I have discussed before this court. His right it's got three sets of three and you have to weigh in wise it and this is a perfect example of what i mean three sets of three. Because i would venture to say if you're going to prognosticate the justice gorsuch would never And he somebody who came out of the tenth circuit. I just courses. I would be hard pressed to see him after his last three opinions The that have come out One challenging the roman diocese Roman or one that the grown mccaffrey diocese jobs the other being out of the south bay pentecostal here in california i. I would be shocked if he ever invoked jacobson after he is basically a just basically dismantled jacobson and it's his quote not mine where he talks about as being elevated to this towering presence. And here amy conybeare invokes jacobson into nine this and does not refer to the full court so it looks like We'll see what the comedy response to next month. I just by september second to the restaurant association petition And the engine company Will be filing as well so an interesting couple of weeks. Cover now one last question. I'd like to ask you that. We didn't discuss beforehand How may or does the newly instated mask mandate for a vaccine mandate rather proof of vaccine for los angeles county..

jacobson gorsuch amy conybeare restaurant association california los angeles county
"amy conybeare" Discussed on Trumpcast

Trumpcast

02:50 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on Trumpcast

"What the rule was. We just saw the rule change as you said Now any state or municipality that puts into an effect a lockdown order in an existential global pandemic if they make an exemption for nail salons or bike shops the exemption goes to churches to and that is profoundly without getting into the weeds of employment division and religious liberty cases but i think it is a profound up ending of how religious liberty has been analyzed at the court and it happened with nobody noticing and a lot of what happened in the shadows. This year was so so so consequential in profound and because it just slipped out in late night orders. The press didn't necessarily give it the attention it needed and the court kind of ignored it when the court analyzed fulton. They act as though they hadn't already fundamentally altered the rules of religious liberty and radically altering those rules in shadow docket. Five to four decision is not something a moderate would do right so that alone. That data point alone should be proof enough to put to bed. The canard that amy conybeare it is a moderate. No no moderate no judge with a genuine moderate bent would ever manipulate a courts rules. Philly break a courts rules to affect such a radical shift and yet that's what barrett did and we know she was the fifth vote here because even chief justice roberts who's genuinely good friend to religious freedom and even religious exemptions. He dissented from from tannin from the decision. We're talking about And i noticed in so many of these end of the term up pieces when journalists were giving their breakdown of how divided the court was and how unanimous the court was excluded shadow docket decisions so they say oh there were so few five to four decisions but that's only in the normal cases. These shadow daca cases were quite frequently five to four. But because they aren't being factored into the stats. Nobody notices them and the end of term rapa pieces create the false impression the false narrative that the court is more unanimous and more in agreement on major major issues than it actually is. So we're going to take a break here but if you like what you're hearing and you wanna hear more from dalia and myself on another topic checkout our sleep.

amy conybeare fulton justice roberts Philly barrett dalia
"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

The Erick Erickson Show

05:38 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

"I'm gonna talk to her. And then at the top of the hour. Stick with kelly leffler. This senator from georgia is going to be joining me as well to talk about the campaign and lindsey graham later in the show talk about the campaign. Lots of people want to talk about the election. It is eric erickson here across the state of georgia. Someone else who is going all across the state of georgia is bidding ans- from concerned women for america. Lots of bus across the state and she is joining me friend. How are you merry christmas. Merry christmas eric. Thank you so much for having me on today. I've been listening in. You're speaking my language. My friend i appreciate it so now i saw your instagram. You've been in columbus and away. Y'all are going everybody's on buses around here right now. Well and i was. I was freezing to death but it was worth it to be there for the You know saving the majority rally. With the vice president. Yesterday and senator leffler and senator purdue with your boy. You georgians sturdy people. We're in the south but Man you people were. The cold did not within their enthusiasm. Not one bit. Well you just wait until there's one flake of snow and then watch what happens sir. I've heard about that. Oh man and you're down here. well it's it's just. I mean poor in snow up up in washington right now so he at least you're a little bit protected. No let's talk about what you guys are doing around the state If you can just let the listeners know what they're doing how can they be involved all that good stuff. Thank you well and eric. Has you know concerned women for america's the nation's largest public policy conservative women's organisation. We have about a half a million members around the country we have about twenty thousand supporters members activists here in the state of georgia and they are god fearing country. Lovin women who are unapologetically pro-life and so we just really wanted to come down here. We're on a four high bus so if any of your listeners passes today honk and wave And we're just gonna assume all those hong or your listeners that loves us in on the side of the bus it says she prays she votes on one side of it and on the other side is says women for amy conybeare because we were in that bus for twelve days before the confirmation of judge barrett and of course now it says now it's just a spirit and on the front of her picture we have the word confirmed and so we wanted to be down here to remind people why the spin it matters. You know. I think justice amy conybeare. It is the perfect example of wives. Georgians have to vote and why are there members and supporters and all of our like minded women and men have to step up. It's not just for georgia but it's really important for georgia but it's really for the rest of the country. It's for all of us. It's for our future so that's why you have people like me coming from the dc area..

georgia kelly leffler eric erickson senator leffler lindsey graham eric amy conybeare america columbus judge barrett cold washington dc
"amy conybeare" Discussed on Pond's Feed

Pond's Feed

05:17 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on Pond's Feed

"We're likely not gonna find out and then it's going to end up being a whole thing and with trump right now. It looks like he's you know he's getting ready to push it into the courts so it's likely that's it's looking like more and more unless it's a sweep for biden end up having supreme court decision like in two thousand and how you think that's gonna go because from what i know is that that that's the From what had know that trump is definitely Step stumbling out his sword. For rica's. I mean i've heard him whining. The delayed election Sale these other things in almost like he knows things aren't going well for him. But then you got. The supreme court is disappointed with right before this. Anyone like okay. How's that gonna go. I mean is there any laws to prevents any one-sided direction unfortunately there's no law that's gonna prevent like amy conybeare it from weighing in on that decision even though it's you know just super inappropriate because she was nominated eight days before the election and then if the election comes to the supreme court it's like whoa you know what the heck what the heck are you doing But she i mean some people are saying that she's already by because as soon as she was elected she she attended a trump rally or trump event. So some people are saying. That is signaling. That she's going to weigh in on the election if it gets there. I don't necessarily know because of how much pressure was put on her during the questioning. I feel like she feel like she's going to weigh in. But i don't necessarily think that she's one hundred percent gonna go to trump. I think it will come down to the arguments That that are made one way or the other but unfortunately for for those that are opposing trump. he has weighed the courts In his favor he's that that has been his primary goal the last four years and he's done it successfully with little to no Little to no pushback from From from the other side he's appointed over three over three hundred judges to the circuit courts. And now three supreme court justices like the courts are bread and butter and he knows it. So he wa- if anything that's going to the courts exactly what he wants while okay. So how would you picture would be. How do you think this could be possible for bio and light guide. What would happen sweet He'd have to have like a massive majority enough to deter trump from From even wanting to move forward because like if it's close drums not gonna stop you know..

trump rica amy conybeare biden
"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

The Erick Erickson Show

03:38 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

"Mind giving loans with terms e countries like Sri Lanka can't meets the takeover infrastructure. Lanka I it just it's dominant and and we've got so many people in this country who almost root against this country who would become dominant if Joe Biden got elected and if the Democrats took the Senate now let me ask you about. Some of the state of play in the Senate this I remember I'm old enough to remember a month and a half ago win. The New York Times told you guys yo would be wiped out if amy conybeare was confirmed and yet she's got a fifty six percent of popularity rating after the confirmation hearings. Now I think the popularity writing Eric actually went a little bit more than that and yes. After people got to know her the numbers went from like thirty percent in the high fifties. You're exactly right and people felt like well Yano. Institution says the president is to nominate somebody and we are the Senate is to provide advice or consent. You can say, no, that's the advice you give is no, that's okay. But you gotta do something and of course, we had our our friends across the aisle chose not to show up for the vote. And we voted out of committee anyway they just were eight wall did not do their job that day Dr Their pay absent without leave. And so and then they all voted against her on the floor and you had some of them like Tim. Kaine out of Virginia and macy Hirano use it to throw a little temper tantrum and I have to tell you Eric the Democrats just basically had a good old fashioned come apart on this. And the reason the reason they did is they did not want to constitutionalists jurists on the Supreme Court now. When I rapped up the debate for the Republican side of the aisle in my remarks I mentioned one of my colleagues who was over on the left who had said that his fear was that justice bear it would usher in an era of conservative activism on the court. So. I took the time to point out to him and to the body and to the country that Republicans. Do not want activist judges of any strikes. Conservative or liberal. What 'cause we got is not the constitutional duty of the court. Their duty is to be an independent judiciary to rely on the Constitution and the statutes that are in law. If you don't like the law, you go legislate to change the law, but you do not tell you that responsibility to the supreme. Court. USED FLASH WE DON'T. Want activists. What we want is to have people who are going. To abide by the rule of law. People that are going to make constitutional positions and are going to call strike. Amen to that I i. wish they would understand that they don't want to know I need to shift gears real quick before at a time because I got to ask you about the twitter hearing yesterday. Well, the technology companies here yesterday 'cause I I was particularly flabbergasted with Cory Gardner Line of the Holocaust you probably not aware of this, but the former prime minister of Malaysia this morning is on social media on..

Senate Supreme Court Joe Biden Sri Lanka Eric Dr Their amy conybeare Cory Gardner The New York Times macy Hirano twitter Virginia Tim president Malaysia Kaine prime minister
Tlingit Artefacts Decision, ACA Concerns, and Arizona Voters Mobilized

Native America Calling

03:50 min | 1 year ago

Tlingit Artefacts Decision, ACA Concerns, and Arizona Voters Mobilized

"This is national native. News Antonio Gonzalez a collection of artifacts from the Clink Frog House clan can continue to be displayed in a Museum that's despite a legal challenge that reached Alaska's highest court as Clare Struggle with K. H. NS reports the State Supreme Court has apparently ended. A decades-old will dispute over control of the cultural treasures. When Frog House clan members disputed the sale of artifacts to a Canadian collector in the nineteen seventies an Alaska. Superior. Court judge ruled that they actually belonged to all members of clones frog. House. The court ordered them placed in the care of clan elders living in the clan's traditional lands on the Upper Lynn Canal. It added a condition, they could only be sold with the unanimous consent of all frog clan members until the safe place was found near cluck won the artifacts would sit in the state museum in Juneau. There they remained for decades. Until last year when the carvings considered masterpieces were returned to quad. But that didn't sit well with some descendants who filed a lawsuit last summer. They argued that by housing the artifacts in the tribes heritage. Center the court had given them to the whole tribe rather than the frog house. Petersburg attorney Fred Trim made case in September that the Jocic one heritage center and Clock One kept the artifacts out of the clans reach. The protests clan members of whom their one hundred and four cannot use the artifacts. Artifacts are locked up in a museum that's not under the control or even. Recently, accessible to the Prague House numbers that the State's Supreme Court justices were unmoved in decision released on October twenty. First, they wrote the lower court had been correct and only exceptional circumstances could overturn the ruling from nineteen seventy eight. The for house posts and a copy of a carped screen are displayed at the joke one heritage sun her and cluck one the center is closed for the season but group to are available by appointment. I'm Clare Trample new. Mexico US Senator Tom Udall spoke on the Senate floor. Monday calling for the protection of Healthcare for native Americans before the Senate confirmation of Judge Amy Conybeare it to the Supreme Court. You'll raise concerns about the future of the affordable care act due to upcoming challenges. Udal says a repeal would devastate Indian country. opened the doors for so many native Americans to access the care they need. Whether it's an unplanned medical emergency or routine wellness checkups and screenings. Access to quality healthcare critical for native communities face disproportionate impacts from the COVID nineteen pandemic. The federal government has a trust and treaty obligation to consult with tribes and to provide native Americans healthcare. The affordable care act permanently reauthorized the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to Ke legal authority for the Indian service and expansion of access to healthcare for native Americans. You'll was among a group of senators and opposition of Barrett's Supreme Court nomination. Racial Equity Groups are hosting a virtual event Tuesday night to mobilize voters in Arizona. A key battleground state the National Congress of American Indians is joining Hispanic Asian. American. Native Hawaiian, and other groups to host the event to discuss voting and a number of issues from Kobe nineteen to racial justice. The event will be streamed on facebook at together we vote a Z.

Supreme Court State Supreme Court Frog House Clink Frog House Alaska Antonio Gonzalez Prague House Senate National Congress Of American Cluck Clare Struggle Upper Lynn Canal Senator Tom Udall Facebook Mexico Juneau Judge Amy Conybeare Arizona Petersburg
Born This Way Is Old Science

The BreakPoint Podcast

04:33 min | 1 year ago

Born This Way Is Old Science

"The confirmation hearings for Judge Amy, CONYBEARE IT Senator Maisy. Hirano of Hawaii expressed outrage and shock that the nominee would use the term sexual preference instead of sexual orientation sexual preference announced senator. TORONTO. Is An offensive and outdated term used by anti lgbtq activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice. It is not after the Exchange Merriam Webster which apparently like most Americans had not gotten that Nemo with these new linguistic absolutes quickly changed the definition of sexual preference in its online dictionary. To, indicate that this wording is now offensive who knew we'll beyond the orwellianism of the literally changing the dictionary to support a political climb. It seems that Senator Hirano is the one who's actually behind the Times on this whole sexual orientation versus Sexual Preference Issue According to Dr Glenn Stanton, and then outstanding new article at public discourse. Judge Barrett's terminology is actually more in line with the latest thinking of leading gender scholars for example, Professor Sorry Van Anders at candidates Queens University has stated that. Quote sexual orientation as a term is increasingly seen as regressive because it belongs to the bio centralist project translating to English. What she saying is that the word orientation suggests that sexuality is hard wired and according to Professor Anders that's just not the consensus anymore among her peers though the whole born this way claim was once a very useful slogan to advance gay rights it no longer serves the goals of the LGBTQ. Movement years ago for instance, two scholars at Ucla question the concept of. Sexual. Orientation especially for women to instead that women's sexuality and Orientation Fluid Changeable over time and variable across social context other social scientists that Glenn Stanton quotes in his public discourse Article Call For a paradigm shift in how female sexuality is studied and described, and there've been plenty of surveys indicate that most self identified lesbians will have relationships with men. At some point. There's also a more obvious problem with the idea of a fixed orientation that's found in the very initials of the acronym especially the. Be The queue of lgbtq as political commentator Douglas Murray who identifies as gay by the way rights bisexuals continued to be viewed as some kind of betrayal from within the gay community gay men tend to believe that men who claim to be by are in fact, gays in some form of denial yet according to a pew research report from last summer bisexuals account for almost half of all LGBTQ adult in the US in fact, the authors of a new book published by Harvard University Press. Think. That male bisexuals are those who call themselves mostly straight vastly outnumber exclusively gay men. Thus they conclude the old system of gay straight or BI has as stanton puts, it outgrown its usefulness and even bigger challenge in the B. to the born. This way dogma is the T- gay rights and gay marriage were sold to us. The premise that homosexuality is hard wired maybe even genetic like race but anyone claiming transgender as an identity does. So in spite of physical and genetic realities not because. Of them and the CUE which usually stands for questioning well, that continues to evolve in both meaning and practice to include more and more sexual preferences as an identity. Well, one wonders whether Senator Horon would feel compelled to lecture the various social scientists that Glenn Stanton sites. In this article my suspicion is she wouldn't in fact, my suspicion is that Senate Arana was fed this talking point by an aide who's checking twitter and saw it as an opportunity to tar and feather judge Barrett as. A big what's ultimately revealed by her political posturing awoke language policing however is crucially important for all of us to now that phrases such a sexual orientation or sexual preference or whatever. The latest nomenclature are terms made up not to describe reality but to advance the idea that has revolutionized. So much of our culture on politics that sexual attraction and urge define and determine who we are. That's the idea we can never embrace even if we're facing outrage from a senator

Dr Glenn Stanton Senator Senator Hirano Judge Barrett Senator Horon Professor Anders Senator Maisy Judge Amy Glenn Stanton Toronto Exchange Merriam Webster Stanton Hawaii Ucla United States Queens University Harvard University Press Douglas Murray Twitter
Senate to confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominee a week ahead of Election Day

Monocle 24: The Briefing

09:05 min | 1 year ago

Senate to confirm Trump's Supreme Court nominee a week ahead of Election Day

"Later today if you Senate majority leader Mitch, McConnell's predictions proved accurate the US Senate will vote to confirm amy coming Barrett to the US Supreme Court Bar will be the judge that the Republican Party has been able to put on the bench during President Donald Trump's term, and while she may not be the controversial of these herself her. Confirmation is the Republicans have breezily disregarded the convention which they invoked for years go to keep a barrack Obama nominee from even having confirmation hearings on joined with more on this by Christian mcnichols news editor and Claude Harrington associate professor of American politics at Montfort University. Claude first of all is this now actually a done deal is they the remotest chance at all Barrett doesn't get put on the bench? I think it's. All bots jail she seems to be there I. IT's. It's quite staggering to see how fast. The process can move when people actually wanted to unlike 'em time round as you mentioned just a moment ago. So yeah, I would say unnecess- some unanticipated and catastrophe she's had. Chris, the Republicans hypocrisy here is mildly staggering MRIs, of course, the same Republican Party that four years ago clutched polls and affected vipers at the very idea of even holding confirmation hearings for Merrick. Garland who Barack Obama wished to put on the court in the last year of his presidency they going to do this about a week out from a presidential election. But this isn't what justifies the trump thing in the as far as the Republican establishment is concerned absolutely I mean I think the issue is if you look at this from a purely political perspective taking out the the hypocrisy argument if you will Mitch McConnell and the Republicans in the Senate have achieved. What they wanted to achieve and they have, they have given people who voted for Donald Trump essentially what they wanted I think you can divide those who voted for Donald Trump in two thousand sixteen obviously into many different camps. But there were there were those who voted for trump himself. But then there were many who simply voted for a Republican with this in mind with the idea in minded, they would be able. Influence. The Supreme Court for decades to come remember as you said at the beginning Obama was denied I'm nominee that meant that there was a vacant spot open right when Donald trump was elected president, which was then filled and that in itself would have been a dramatic swing in the other direction. So we shouldn't forget that it was a very conservative Justice Antonin Scalia who had passed away or shortly before the two thousand sixteen. Election. So we have seen a dramatic shift in the court compared to what would have happened if Hillary Clinton had been elected president and so in that sense. Yes. From a purely political perspective, the Senate Mitch McConnell who is a traditional Republican was You could argue very much power political individual who was willing to stomach donald trump and some of his politics because he knew that this is what he would be able to achieve. At once amy conybeare. At ease confirmed, that will give the Supreme Court, a six three conservative majority. Now, that's not absolutely set in stone Supreme Court justices have been known to have minds of their own from time to time, but is it possible from distance to assess what difference that could make to American politics for as Chris quite rightly points out potentially decades ahead of us. Yes I think that that's absolutely not an overstatement to to to to say how significant this is. You know what they did. There would be an ideological. Conservative majority from this point on and. There's a couple of things I suppose one is. What it might mean in terms of what's coming before the court you know in the short to medium term I mean there are. Big issues coming down the road to do you know things on climate change on immigration and other major. Political stumbling blocks the one that's coming soon as I really am the one that's going to get the most attention for the moment is a vote on the for care act and that is coming before the courtroom, November and it's about rather than the the. Statute in its entirety is to be deemed unconstitutional or can can parts of it be on picked now? Komi Bats. Take on. This is going to be enormously important because if there is a possibility that's M obamacare in its entirety could be undermined and that's that's a fairly enormous moment. I think for the country not least when it's in the the grip ave, a public health crisis. Chris at the top of the show, we did play a quote by senator. McConnell which struck me as slightly all I don't know whether he misspoke or just found himself saying the quiet out loud. But he said a lot of what we've done over the last four years. We'll be undone sooner or later by the next election is that Mitch McConnell assuming or perhaps even hoping that trump gets beaten next Tuesday It wasn't interesting remark wasn't it? It's it's hard to say I think there might be a little bit of that in in his remarks you can read into it I do think more importantly though his comment related to what I was saying earlier I would argue that he is making this case almost a gloating case to say you can undo whenever you win whether it is in November as the polls suggest. Currently or not you can. You can undo much of what we did in the four years in electoral terms in legislative terms I should say, but you cannot undo what we've done on the court that will remain that will remain something that stays for a long period of time. The one thing I just wanted to say on that as well. I think it will be interesting with this conservative majority To really see how aggressively they go after that to to Mitch McConnell's point if you will things like the affordable care act they were passed by Congress if there is a Democratic president with Joe Joe Biden becoming president, they will have an opportunity to pass laws to to to change laws as well. Of course. So the question really will be to what extent this cord goes after laws declaring things. Versus giving Congress an opportunity to sort of legislate when it comes to things like healthcare as well. There were some interesting remarks I just add for Amy Coney Barrett on this in the past, he's talked about the idea of precedent the idea of who legislates when when you overturn precedent and she did have a little bit of a line to say she will own the overturn precedence. If there is still controversy in a certain issue. So if it is something that is divisive and it has not been decided if there is an overwhelming public support for something, she also believes that it's not the courts job to overturn it, and so that I think will be a key thing to watch going forward if we have say a democratic President Democratic majority but a conservative court. Claude if next Tuesday is a big win for the democratic. Party. As Senator Mitch McConnell appears to think it's going to be the not completely without options are there is the possibility as has been floated off expanding the Supreme Court but do you think a democratic administration would be willing to spend political capital doing that? Yes. It's interesting to see how the the the kind of the tightrope that Biden has been walking in his language on this topic and you know any mention of packing the court does. Bays alarm bells, I think in causes some concern people start talking about FDR on his efforts back in the day. I would say, maybe there might be an possibly needs to be a conversation about reforming court gets in its current. Is. Having become such a punishment killed body and it's certainly not what the framers set out to be, and the does probably you know some serious conversations that need to be had I suppose as one other point as well. Maybe just more. And immediately, is that the last male liberal on the court Stephen Prayer is the HVAC too. So. I. Mean He seems in relatively good shape put. It's quite likely that whoever is President the next four years, we'll have the opportunity to put. A new justice on the court. So that's just something to think about in terms of the balance clothes. Harrington Christian. Thank you both for joining

Senator Mitch Mcconnell Donald Trump President Trump Supreme Court Us Senate Barack Obama Republican Party Us Supreme Court Bar Amy Coney Barrett Claude Harrington Chris Joe Joe Biden Congress Justice Antonin Scalia Republican Establishment Hillary Clinton Amy Conybeare AMY Montfort University
Barrett nomination clears Senate hurdle, putting her on course to confirmation to Supreme Court

Heartland Newsfeed Radio Network

00:39 sec | 1 year ago

Barrett nomination clears Senate hurdle, putting her on course to confirmation to Supreme Court

"Republicans voting overwhelmingly to limit debate on Judge Amy County Barrett's nomination to the Supreme Court with nearly all Republicans on board for her confirmation vote tomorrow a near Party line fifty, one to forty eight vote in the Senate overcame an attempted filibuster by Democrats in advanced. Supreme Court. Nominee judge amy conybeare it. All Democrats opposed moving forward with the nomination in addition a Republican Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. Vice. President Mike Pence is expected to preside over the Senate tomorrow evening when a final confirmation vote is set making good Republican hopes to confirm president. Trump's third supreme court nominee ahead of Election Day Fox's jared

Supreme Court Judge Amy County Barrett Senate Amy Conybeare President Trump Mike Pence Susan Collins Lisa Murkowski Donald Trump Jared FOX
Conservatives Hope SCOTUS Will Now End Cervical Cancer Screening

The Topical

00:59 sec | 1 year ago

Conservatives Hope SCOTUS Will Now End Cervical Cancer Screening

"As Amy Conybeare it's nomination continues to move through the Senate. This week conservatives are hopeful the possibility of Supreme Court. Majority means the days on demand cervical cancer detection will soon be over our Supreme Supreme Court correspondent. Rebecca. Neal joins us now with more Rebecca welcome thanks Leslie while Liberal Saber, it's confirmation could have terrible implications for the future of Women's health care, conservatives today are rejoicing many Christians pro-life groups and Republican leaders like Congressman Gary Small would say that wants Barrett is appointed to the highest court in the land. They'll finally have the judicial power needed to shutdown planned parenthood's agenda that provides pap smears HPV tests that screen for Cancer Amy Coney. Barrett's nomination is a victory for Christian America and Christians. She will give voice in the Supreme Court to Americans who want to protect life all life whether it's a developing human child or a precious tiny tumor growing inside the wall

Supreme Court Supreme Supreme Court Rebecca Amy Conybeare Amy Coney Barrett Congressman Gary Small Cancer Senate Neal Leslie
"amy conybeare" Discussed on No Agenda

No Agenda

08:04 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on No Agenda

"Rockets. I got. A couple of our producers who had vegas. Work on the F thirty five. The. Turkey. Trump pipe in that ups a piece of crap. That's what everybody's been saying since the by heard the same thing from a bunch of military. Let me just give you the story to this fresh in my mind. So one, the problem with lightning is the way it's constructed typically, lightning will hit the wing or some part in it. You know it's directed up and out so it'll it balances off the aircraft. For, some reason, the construction of the F thirty, five it actually. The the the wing or wherever us, it would hit the wing. So they have to replace it takes two weeks. That is not combat sufficient aircraft. And from what I understand from a lot of people is we're selling the Saudis are getting. Anybody Hey we got a deal. Trump is out there selling the F thirty five which is so great. You can't see it. Like. That line so great you can't see it. It's a piece of crap. Sorry for everybody worked on it s no I'm sorry. Making money for the for the Republic Yeah we're selling it. That's for sure. Okay, let's go to another. There's a long when the other two are short. This is a is by trump biden's healthcare. Remember when they ask the question at the debate with the Democrats were up there. You had all these Democrats they started for. Twenty, six. And in fact I said there's no way that pick on them because she treated him worse than anybody else and her poll numbers were dropping like a rock. Who is going to give? Money Healthcare to illegal aliens. So they all raised their hand remember Joan looking around. I hit understand that. He. Did you know at least he has an excuse because he has no clue what the hell they're asking. But you remember his physician, he was like this. Their hands are all wiggle to give all our money who forget about all you people will remember Joe so he's standing there. Are you gonNA give a healthcare to illegal immigrants people that come into the country illegally in other words they come into legally. And under a plan they have the manifesto. They WanNa give them a lawyer. That's what we need this lawyers. They WanNa, give them a lawyer. They WANNA. Give him education. They WANNA give him healthcare but they asked the question and I said, wow, because I think they had like twenty six people originally. But everyone of them raise their hand including sleepy Joe, what happened? His Joe's like this everybody other Han Jo, you could see his. For forty seven years. He's got the itch because he's like. He knows this isn't going to work. He said himself because you know there's still something left not much. To himself a natural estimate, a political instinct. And his shoulder one up. And then his hand. So I I don't think I'll be going to hold it. I'M NOT GONNA hold him I get enough how about the no fracking an that was flat. That wasn't that was good with the hell. was he saying that didn't work for me. It worked for the audience now. Okay. I didn't hear it was also very visual. And by the way, it's you know you can sound like don't you biased towards trump we're probably the only place. You can actually hear a minute of trump. Uninterrupted. That isn't just a sound bite if you know. Someone saying look they have no masks. Doesn't show would anymore no Fox is lost it. Okay I got two more. To let's go. Let's do this. Let's do the I don't know what to say material Lwo a Second Amendment if Democrats win, they will Supreme Court with radical left. Read our Second Amendment and believe if they. Your Second Amendment is a gun. Okay. Empower violent mobs and shield deadly criminals and terrorists. Very Simple Joe Biden refuses to even answer questions pack in the Supreme Court. How about this up to do you want to pack the court could answer that question You know why? Because they don't ask if he you know me it would be like. Forget. But they say you were going to pack the court Sir. I'm not going to answer that because I don't want to say. Okay. Good. Next question. No, can you believe? This is the essence of our country. We can't allow this to happen, and the other thing is they don't ask the second. You know the What he's saying about the Second Amendment is just as bad as Democrats hounding. A Amy Conybeare, it's all the Roe v Wade was on the ballot Roe v Wade it'll be you'll be on your health care Obamacare I. Agree. With that all sides of this shut up everybody it's it's laying. That one side. Roll over the others. But. Let's just call it what it is your second you know it To get rid of amendments by writing a new one. and. Just you know someone winning the presidency but I. So let's go to the last clip, which is this is the perfect heff. This is the good. This is the best of the group. I'm sorry. So Trump I got I. got it. We're going to do it free. We're going to do it for their fall. We're going to do it free. So we're in the process of. Getting into emergency. It's called emergency use authorization and we're going to regenerate and the Eli Lilly. Pro Drug, we're going to give it to everybody and I. Hope they have the kind of luck that I have but maybe I would have been perfect anyway I like to say I didn't need it. I would have been perfect anywhere because. You know I said that I said sarcastically I said, well, I'm in no danger because I'm in perfect physical shape and a very young and CNN goes reports. President trump lie to the American public. They said. Can you believe this? Yeah I can believe it meanwhile Joe Biden. Joe Biden actual funny stuff and you probably caught this there was. I presume credible enough survey that I saw a CNN reporting it apparently fifty six percent of Americans feel that this is this is the question. So it's one of these loaded questions that you know everyone asks I'm running for President I'm running for reelection. Are you better off than you were four years ago? Now. So apparently fifth, this was a a pew study. I think. Fifty. Six percent of Americans say they are better off today than they were four years ago and this statistic was posed to Joe Biden. Last week. My guide you can't even hear. His answer but this was like a stereo clip. Shoots can you hear this? Can you even understand that I can barely but I have to concentrate. Can play is that how long is it the Biden clear? This guy was way in the background off my don't worry. Think. Of Screw it, I'm sorry it's no good I don't know what happened. It sounds. Rundown. It he said those people It was a gaffe. I'm sorry I don't I. It was funny. I can't do it. It was It doesn't work. It was dumb Biden Gaffe doesn't work if. It doesn't work. Well, the only dumb Biden Gaffe I have is the one where he mcgann says he's running for Senate e saved it. Oh. This is.

Joe Biden Democrats Trump Turkey President Supreme Court Rockets. CNN Joan Senate Fox Han Jo Eli Lilly Amy Conybeare Pro Drug mcgann Roe Obamacare
"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

The Erick Erickson Show

05:49 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

"Now, of course, you get lit on fire for saying these sorts of things because the science is not on the side of it therefore, the mob must be on the side of it and shut up anyone who dares to say otherwise are people born gay or straight listen we're all born centers and and so I definitely think that. There are people if the scripture says, homosexuality is a sin. Can you born center? Yes you can. Theologically it sound Are you actually I don't have the science on the side of it in the same way there is no science on the side of transgenderism. Again, you get a little on fire I apologize in advance to the station advertisers who will be bombarded with hate complaints for me daring to point this stuff out. You can tell that something isn't real. By Howell. Vigorously, the mob must defend it. and. The fact that the mob is out to denounce the use of the phrase sexual preference win just forty eight hours ago. It was an acceptable phrase. A tells you everything you need to know about where the left is going with this right now it is unfortunate that we've reached this decision, this opinion and this this level of mob mentality against a woman who's going to be. On the United States Supreme Court but we have and we have for the very specific reason that they must find a way to make people hate her into vilify her because there's really nothing there to vilify amy conybeare Barrett about again a in twenty four hours of morning console poll has thirteen point shift in the number of Democrats who believe she should be on the Supreme Court here's. On CNN, let let's be honest if number one if we could roll back the clock and we were not so close to election number two if we could roll back, even further and this or another Republican president in another age I've been Washington long enough judge Amy Conybeare it would be getting seventy votes are more in the United States Senate because of her qualifications. But yes, we're we're not in that age anymore John went on to point out we're not in that age we should be. It is it is chiefly the Democrats who have attempted to weaponize the United States Supreme Court. If you listen to the Democrats, they are afraid that all of the undemocratic advances they have made in society might be rolled back by a judge who dares to read the Constitution say, Hey, this isn't for.

United States Supreme Court amy conybeare Barrett Amy Conybeare United States transgenderism Howell CNN John Senate Washington president
"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

The Erick Erickson Show

02:34 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Erick Erickson Show

"I'm back welcome. It is Eric Erickson here it is my show. Thank you, Allen Sanders. For sitting behind the microphone the last couple of days while I took some time off with the family. Well, technically, we were going to take time off and then they all got sick. So my my wife God bless her told me I could sneak out of town for a couple of days to avoid getting sick so that I could be with you for every day between now and the election a programming note real quick starting tonight. If you follow me on facebook or instagram at e W Erickson. We're going to start doing a series of video chats each week to this week next week, and then on the third week, it'll be the day after the election but I'll give you more insider stuff I've got a ton of insider stuff to share with you today. From a tour of swing states that I have conducted in person alive inspection I WanNa talk to you about that today as well. But first, we gotta get started with the amy. Coney Barrett hearings. These, hearings are designed for really for both sides. I think to play to their base to a degree but it what's remarkable is that a morning console poll which the media t take seriously so I think we should take seriously a morning console consult polls shows eight thirteen point shift in democratic opinion in favor of amy. Coney Barrett a thirteen point shift. In the Democrats who believe that she should be confirmed Democrats are now at roughly forty nine percent believe any amy conybeare disqualified to be on the United States Supreme Court end should be confirmed, which is actually a really big deal given the democratic talking points against her that have gotten genuinely absurd. And when I say absurd I mean she was actually asked by Maisy Hirono the dimwitted senator from from. where she from? Hawaii, if amy conybeare had ever raped anyone you you would like to think that she did not ask that. But in fact, Senator Hirono from Hawaii asked Amy Coney Barrett. To ensure the fitness of nominees for a Lifetime appointment to the federal bench are to any of the other positions of for any of the committees on which they appear I asked each nominee, these two questions, and I will ask them view since you became a legal adult. Have you ever made unwanted.

amy conybeare Amy Coney Barrett Coney Barrett amy Senator Hirono Eric Erickson Hawaii United States Supreme Court Allen Sanders e W Erickson facebook senator instagram
"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

The Dan Bongino Show

05:58 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Dan Bongino Show

"But here in Fox News and elsewhere there is a lot more going on so. I I wish I could cover this the whole show because it's just such a damning story about where we are in this country Joe Biden's become a protected class despite such obvious malfeasance but there is more going on Amy Coney Barrett hearings yesterday. Were another disaster for the Democrats seemingly have not learned their lesson from the disaster, the Cavanaugh hearings where they lost. They remember the seats they lost. The Democrats senators who were involved in that hearing lost their seats. They haven't learned anything from that nothing even though the Democrats won the house back in that midterm election, the Democrats undescended who were involved in the cabinet he's lost seats. They've learned nothing. Here is seriously the dumbest member of the United States Senate I am not kidding. Asking a grotesque, disgusting? Question. Of An accomplished professional. Mother Lawyer Public Servant Amy Conybeare it of course who was nominated for Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat. Listen to this grotesque eighty by the dumbest member of the US Senate Bar. Now, there's not even a close second. Maisy Hirono who's asking, she hasn't asked this question of Joe Biden who is actually been accused of sexual assault. She asked with zero evidence whatsoever. Any of this is true. She Asks Amy Conybeare in front of her kids if she's ever been accused of sexually assaulting someone here we go. The dumbest member of the Senate never fails to disappoint this all maisy Hirono to ensure the fitness of nominees for a Lifetime appointment to the federal bench or to any of the other. Positions of for any of the committees on which they appear I ask each nominee, these two questions and I will ask them of you since you became illegal adult have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors are committed any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature. Now, Senator Hirono have you ever face disciplined or entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct now? Senator. Just bird do you think it is appropriate for justices to consider real world impacts and their decision making as Justice Ginsburg noted and a number of her dissents that she s Joe Biden. I question because the answer unfortunately be yes. Member Tara. Reid to accuse Joe Biden accusations nonetheless. Not Saying they're true or not, but they are accusations. Joe Biden has been accused of. Sexual she s she asked him that question to know because he answered. Yes. She asked this question of coney bet she's no evidence. Any of that's true. You know I was on Parlor yesterday commenting. About this hearing after the show live lifetime. and. tweeted you to now now macy Hirono speaking only if you want to preserve neuronal mass in your brain because you will slowly prune your Denver rights and Exxon's and lose probably twenty to thirty IQ points every syllable uttered maisy Hirono mouth. Now, the destruction of the Democrats by Coney Barrett who is cool calm and as cool as the other side of the pillow yesterday got even worse. Here's the just. Rabid. Amy Klobuchar I've just furious that she had to dare. Be faced. With these questions. She does Amy Klobuchar and other Democrat radical. How dare you offend me by being in my presence Amy Conybeare Barrett. And this just proves to you again why Amy Cody Barrett's GonNa come out of this with flying colors. Because she's a superior intellect. As again Paula comment that yesterday she's like, can you imagine how Amy Cody Barrett feels the superior intellect dealing with these morons and I'm like you're right like it's got to be almost offensive to her but she sits there and she plays their game. So here's Amy Klobuchar trying to catch Amy Coney Barrett in a in some kind of like a catch twenty two here where she's like well. You keep talking about these super precedents in other words, legal precedents that we wouldn't dare overturn like desegregation and things like that right. So she's trying to catch her in and watch Amy Barrett turned the table and in Kobe tries to turn the table back and amy conybeare just rex her because she's just smarter than Amy Klobuchar check this out throw a super precedent. HOW WOULD YOU DEFINE SUPER PRECEDENT? I actually I might have bought some someday. I'd be sitting in that chair. I'm not I'm up here. So I'm ask. People, super precedent differently. Okay. The way that it's used in the scholarship and the way that I was using it and the article that you're reading from was to define that are so well settled that no political actors and no people seriously push for their overruling and I'm answering a lot of questions about row which I think indicates that road fall in that category and scholars across the spectrum say that doesn't mean that rose should be overruled but descriptively, it does mean that it's not a case that everyone has accepted and doesn't call for its overruling I don't think. So here's what here's. The I. Don't know if you let me translate what just happened there. Because just listening to it, you can tell Kloba charge just getting angry because she's a numskull and amy cody Barrett's genius. What Amy Klobuchar was trying to do radical Democrats senator. She's trying to get Amy Coney Barrett to talk about abortion to make a political viral ad for twitter. She wants Amy Conybeare at say I hate abortion. I'm going to overturn Roe versus Wade and then so they can use that to.

Amy Conybeare Barrett Amy Conybeare Amy Klobuchar Amy Coney Barrett Joe Biden Amy Cody Barrett Senator Hirono United States Senate Justice Ginsburg assault Fox News US Senate Bar Cavanaugh Senator maisy Hirono senator Paula twitter Kloba
"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Takeaway

The Takeaway

08:16 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Takeaway

"The confirmation hearing so far why I think it's because The Republicans have really put it out there I'm one of the things that I was particularly struck by wise in the day job opening statements it was the rare Republican who could get through their ten minutes statement without bringing up the fact that she has seven children and going even farther to say that not only does she have seven children. Two of those children were adopted and really underscoring the connection between the size of her family and her qualifications for the Supreme Court and so her essential identity. So you know it's understandable that she is proud of her family and certainly referenced them introduced them but it was striking to me that it was such a talking. Point among the Republicans in fact, robin to that point about mentioning her adopted children. She also, they also highlighted the fact that they were children who were adopted from Haiti the attention and bringing that up for me. What I found particularly striking was it seemed to be a way of quietly underscoring a sense that amy conybeare. It is a open armed charitable person that she is a person who celebrates and embraces diversity because those children are from. Haiti and that she is also someone who kind of stands as an example or as evidence for those who want to make the point that there is always a welcoming home for children and therefore there is no need to ever consider abortion. Emma, when you look at these confirmation hearings particularly as Robin noted the first day of the hearings why do you think of? Judge Barrett's motherhood role has become such a key part of the conversation. We've heard over and over again from Republican senators including at the top of today's hearings third day of hearings that Republicans see her as a new kind of icon, a role model for conservative women who don't necessarily have a lot of figures in politics popular culture till up to look up to Lindsey Graham the senator from South Carolina, today was commenting on the fact that he thinks that amy conybeare Barrett is going to be someone that a lot. Of Young Conservative women around the country who are ambitious who WANNA have careers. But who also WANNA have families and who also potentially have pro-life views they're going to look at her and see someone that they can grow up to be and I think Republicans see a lot of advantage of this culturally, and they also see advantage for this politically at a time when they are desperate for women voters to feel like they have a home in Republican Party. But and as we noted at the very top, however, fatherhood doesn't seem to be discussed very often I'm thinking most recently with Brett Kavanagh's confirmation hearings. Is there a double standard here? You know I was thinking of Brett Cavenaugh to because he is clearly very proud of being a father. His daughters had a visible role at his hearings as well. But there was never a question like the one that Senator John cornyn posed to Amy Carney Barrett during her hearings. How'd you do it? How do you possibly manage to balance your career and your large family and I think the Answer here is that the same kinds of sexist assumptions about what women are capable of doing in the sacrifices that they should be making those apply equally to liberal women and conservative women. So I do think that there is a double standard here of examining the way that any coney Barrett balances her family life with professional life in a way that her male colleagues before the Supreme Court back. Rub in what are your thoughts on that? We've got about a minute left in this in this part of the conversation Do you think there's a double standard there? For sure I mean I. Think one of the surprising things for some people is the fact that justice Scalia who? judge Barrett was mentored by had nine children and that was not something that was raised as evidence of his extraordinary ability to balance work and life So I the way that it's being used as a sort of defining feature of up Judge Barrett suggest that. The Role of motherhood is somehow and typical to and technical to the responsibilities of a judge to the responsibilities of a professional and that she has somehow miraculously made these two things work together. Robin, we've been in your piece for the Washington Post. You wrote that quote Barrett had it all on terms that were acceptable to social conservatives. We hear often robin as as women. We often hear about this mythical idea having it all what do you mean there? While, one of the things that was striking to me is is that there was this attempt to suggest that her religion her choices, her her feelings about abortion her sort of traditional family life were held up as evidence of her feminism, but also as her qualifications for the bench. But at the same time you know the Republicans were very quick to be on guard against any sort of suggestion from their colleagues across the aisle that religion should be used as evidence for why she should not be on the bench that her life choices should not be used as evidence for why she may not be supportive of a woman's right to define her own destiny. So they were really trying to have it both ways while at the same time taking the pieces of her life that they found useful ought to support their own cause. Emma you wrote about Judge Barrett's faith and how that sort of. talked about in this moment How is this being considered right now? Is She somebody who embodies the quote unquote good Christian woman ideal. Britney Atlantic about the way that her faith has been discussed Democrats really have tried to avoid s because in a previous confirmation hearing Diane Feinstein the senator from California famously said to then a consideration for a judgeship in. Coney. Barrett. The Dogma lives loudly within you and that's of concern they were referring to her Catholic faith and her participation in a group called people of praise in South Bend Indiana where in. Between Garrett. US. Tot and I think we've seen throughout these hearings that not only Democrats shied away from this re Republicans have leaned into it. They see her faith as something she shouldn't be ashamed of she talks about it as an essential part of her life, and I do think as were considering this model of conservative womanhood conservative empowerment even conservative feminism that Republicans are trying to put forth steak and having A. Community that's a really central part of your life is seen as a huge advantage at something to be proud of, and I think Amy Kuney Barrett has leaned into that as she started to tell her story to the American people. So how often do we see Christian women like Judge Barrett given these high profile professional opportunities or are some of these women expected to forgo their professional embiid in favor of family life. I mean basically.

amy conybeare Barrett robin Judge Barrett coney Barrett Supreme Court Haiti amy conybeare senator Emma Republican Party Senator John cornyn Brett Kavanagh Lindsey Graham Brett Cavenaugh US Washington Post Tot justice Scalia South Carolina Garrett
"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Dave Gram Show on WDEV

The Dave Gram Show on WDEV

04:01 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on The Dave Gram Show on WDEV

"The most Earth a mother it's just got to the point where she has too many children and needs to have it. But otherwise I, think that you know, I'm for the abortion if it's a bunch of teenage girls going into A. Going into hospital and getting into because they don't want the baby they're carrying, and then they go back out get pregnant again. That's a medical problem for them sooner or later it will affect their uterus. Okay. Thanks for the call Bobby. D from Duxbury. What's on your mind this morning? Hi Well, that sounds like High Eugenics me but My husband and I adopted our children. Abortion does kill. A child a human child I mean it's not. Ball now it's science. Full. Even Science, right. and I think this is A. Abortion is terrible. Look at the demographic. Of the United. States of. Vermont of Europe. Of. Japan Japan a dying nation they kill their babies. I mean. This is it's true with these are facts. Numbers you can't. You can't I mean I suppose you can argue with numbers but. They're they're. All right. Well, I gotTa jump appreciate it very much. your call. Thanks for checking in the call the. Very Pertinent Vermont since nineteen, seventy two. Legalize Vermont we have avoided over a hundred thousand. In the state of mind and you will hear so thought Austin. We need an influx of one hundred thousand. Say for economic. Mary beer with you don't. Regret one thing which is that we we've all we're almost out of time here just. Very quickly what are your thoughts about the amy conybeare nomination to the US Supreme Court I gotTa, support that nomination. I won't. About, any event I feel like it's out with the old time as an enlisted. Woman who has not given up the or family he had family on with her life and is even attended may success with two children? If knee. And and I think she'd remarkable and I think the country of allows. Her appointment. Laura Mary thank you very much for spending some time with us this morning, and as I mentioned folks after the bottom of the hour break here on the day Graham Show and W Dav. We're going to be hearing from Lucy. Lucia planned parenthood might hear some. counterarguments here. That's what we do on the day of Graham Show and we just have a minute which is enough time for me to do a couple things. One is to remind everyone that after the show today a little after eleven o'clock, that is with the CBS News, we go live to our special coverage of a one of the breaking news conferences headed up by Governor Phil Scott we're hill have other. State officials with him talking about the states response to the COVID nineteen crisis. It's something we've been carrying for months. Now here on wd the news conferences are Tuesdays and Fridays at eleven. That's when the governor convenes them and we are bringing them to our listeners live, and so you can don't have to dial with the end of the day Graham show this morning he just stay right with wd Ev and We will be back after a bottom of the hour break for some CBS. News..

Vermont Graham CBS Japan Phil Scott Bobby Lucia US Supreme Court amy conybeare Duxbury Europe Lucy Laura Mary Austin W Dav
"amy conybeare" Discussed on Quick News Daily Podcast

Quick News Daily Podcast

04:07 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on Quick News Daily Podcast

"Never I suppose. But getting back to that former biggest story of the weekend. Trump officially nominating any conybeare at for the supreme. Court on Saturday. What I didn't realize I thought was just kind of a thing people were saying but. Amy conybeare was literally made. The group that she was a part of before twenty seventeen and she might still be part of now but call themselves the handmaid's obviously when the handmaid's tale came out, you have to rebrand I would think. And they did. But still. Not Great not non degree to. View of what could lie ahead. Now if you think this handmaid's tale narrative is just hyperbole. There with me for a minute here. It's no secret the net truly truly believe something is really wrong with trump. And I think there's almost no chance that he survives a second term. Now what does that mean? That means that we'll get president pence eventually and for a guy who doesn't. Hang out with women alone in a room without his wife. I. Think we kind of get the idea of what he views about women what his views are about women I should say. And now you have amy conybeare going along with basically all of that. Not a great, not a great mix there. So Now, it's very clear that Republicans and Yeah. Basically Republicans wanted this fight they wanted to say look at them, they're attacking Catholics. It just makes no sense. Number One. Joe Biden is A. A wait a second. He's a Catholic. Our candidate is Catholic. GOES TO CHURCH WAY MORE THAN TRUMP WHO's like Technically Protestant or something. I think we all know what he really is. But they were the only ones talking about Oh look at the Democrats are attacking us before any Democrat even attacked us or them. Like I. Didn't see any Democrats attacking. Catholics just in general. It was all about. Just. Her crazy world views. She's a radical in the religion. I. Don't think that's too controversial to say. And by the way, Republicans aren't really the ones to talk you know. They're the ones who are saying representative OMAR FROM MINNESOTA WANTS TO BRING Sharia Law to America because she wears a Zhob. I mean, if we're going to talk about attacking religion. I think they have to look in the mirror for a second..

Amy conybeare Trump Joe Biden president representative OMAR MINNESOTA America
"amy conybeare" Discussed on Mike Church Presents-The Red Pill Diaries Podcast

Mike Church Presents-The Red Pill Diaries Podcast

05:38 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on Mike Church Presents-The Red Pill Diaries Podcast

"What does it matter? The Democrat Party doesn't do anything if it's not to win political seats in power. I didn't care about the faith doesn't care about you doesn't care about anyone. These people are pro-death, pro execution, pro-abortion. They are anti old people. They're anti everything that has to do with anything with life by the by reminds. How old is the? Newest. Season of. The Roloff story a little big little people is that is that this year Or is that last year I'm just curious. Miniature started watching rewatch because we used to watch it ten years ago. They the little people show with. Amy and, it's Matt. Matt Right Aimee and Matt, and there are a family of show is now the children's somebody children are all grown up but the only to the producers those other show are fascinated by present on the TV show are the two than a baby's. Covered all pregnancy and everything. And I'm watching this is going to like it is obvious babies make families. and. Babies also make TV shows everywhere you turn there is a certain grace that is rising is very subtle. And it's not being done intentionally by by many people but I have a theory about this holy ghost does not ask for permission to. Impress upon wicked people to do the right thing even though they think they're doing wicked things. In any event yes. So. What the episodes that are that are about the kids now are they is that new is from this year okay. So wh- What my point is here is that. The issue of life meet. People trump throws up there to amy conybeare, and the first thing that you think of and the first thing that you see when you see Amy Conybeare a CB is they're all. People running around calling her is what you see here in a black robe but a gavel, you see your what As a wife and a mom. Who's a matter of fact when she comes walking out of the White House at the UH the the white. House. From behind wherever it was that the that when they come out that door. To go out into the Rose Garden in when she makes it really methodical slow walk there with with with.

Amy Conybeare White House Democrat Party Matt Rose Garden Aimee
"amy conybeare" Discussed on CRUSADE Channel Previews

CRUSADE Channel Previews

03:43 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on CRUSADE Channel Previews

"What does it matter? The Democrat Party doesn't do anything if it's not to win political seats in power. I didn't care about the faith doesn't care about you doesn't care about anyone. These people are pro-death pro execution pro-abortion. They are anti old people. They're anti everything that has to do with anything with life by the by reminds. How old is the? Newest season of. The Roloff story a little big little people is that is that this year? Or is that last year I'm just curious. Miniature started watching rewatch because we used to watch it ten years ago. They the little people show with. Amy And it's Matt. Matt Right Aimee and Matt, and there are a family of show is now the children's somebody children are all grown up but the only to the producers those other show are fascinated by present on the TV. Show are the two than a baby's. Covered all pregnancy and everything. And I'm watching, this is going to like it is obvious babies make families. And, babies also make TV shows everywhere you turn there is a certain grace that is rising is very subtle. And it's not being done intentionally by by many people but I have a theory about this holy ghost does not ask for permission to. Impress upon wicked people to do the right thing even though they think they're doing wicked things. In any event? Yes. So what the episodes that are that are about the kids now are they is that new is from this year okay. So wh- What my point is here is that The issue of life meet. People trump throws up there to amy conybeare, and the first thing that you think of and the first thing that you see when you see Amy Conybeare a CB is they're all as many people running around calling her is what you see here in a black robe but a gavel, you see your what. As a wife and a mom. Who's a matter of fact when she comes walking out of the White House at the uh the the White House. From behind wherever it was that the that when they come out that door. To go out into the rose, garden. In when she makes it really methodical slow walk there with with with.

Amy Conybeare White House Democrat Party Matt Aimee
"amy conybeare" Discussed on Democracy Now! Audio

Democracy Now! Audio

01:51 min | 1 year ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on Democracy Now! Audio

"Beautiful liar by the and say, this is democracy. Now, the quarantine report I'm Amy Goodman. President. Trump. Has nominated the conservative federal judge Amy Conybeare it to the supreme. Court to fill Ruth Bader Ginsburg seat veritas a forty eight year old former Notre Dame law professor who clerked for the late Supreme Court. Justice Antonin Scalia on Saturday Barrett spoke alongside president trump at the White House. I clerked, for Justice Scalia more than twenty years ago but the lessons I learned still resonate. His judicial philosophy is mine to. A judge must apply the law.

Justice Antonin Scalia Ruth Bader Ginsburg Amy Goodman Amy Conybeare Supreme Court President Trump White House professor Barrett
Examining the Record of Amy Coney Barrett as Nomination Fight Heats Up

WSJ What's News

05:35 min | 1 year ago

Examining the Record of Amy Coney Barrett as Nomination Fight Heats Up

"President Trump's nominee to the supreme court appeared at the White House over the weekend. Judge Amy Conybeare at pay tribute to the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who seat she is hoping to fill. Should I be confirmed Will be mindful of who came The flag of the United States is still flying at half staff and memory of justice. Ruth. Bader Ginsburg to mark the end of a great. American. Life. Justice Ginsburg began her career at a time when women were not welcome in the legal profession. But she not only broke glass ceilings she smashed them. But there are many ways their philosophies are quite different judge Barrett's legal career. We'll be under the microscope in the weeks ahead. So this is a good time to talk with our justice and judiciary editor, Vivica, Novak, Vivica good to have you here. To be with mark, I want to start out with the basics just who is judge amy, coney? Barrett and why are conservatives so enthusiastic about her nomination. She is a known conservative. She was a clerk for Justice Scalia and has often spoken of him very admiringly. She's been a lot professor Notre Dame and she has continued to teach while she has been on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago in general the anti-abortion groups feel very confident that she would be a vote in their favour whether she'd Overturn Roe v Wade is is unclear, but she is generally not a fan of abortion. Obviously abortion is getting a lot of discussion in this conversation, but this is a court that could. Rule on many different areas including health care even the twenty twenty election would her presence mean on the court? Well, she will be the person who gives the conservatives a six to three majority on the court, and even if Justice Roberts who has occasionally sided with the liberals even if he does that in the future on on certain cases, you know they will still have five votes, five conservative votes. So that's that's one important factor here. She will be probably not a vote in favor of upholding the affordable care act and that's one of the. First arguments. The court will hear it's coming up in November is a challenge to Obamacare and Justice Roberts a couple of years ago in another court challenge to the care he voted with the Liberals and she has actually said in a speech that she believes he voted wrong in that case in fact, he wrote the opinion she believes he was wrong. So that's one important issue coming up, and of course, the election none of us really wants to relive the two thousand election I don't think which was turned to the Supreme Court but it. Could happen it could happen, and if it does, you know there are some trepidation about the six three makeup of the court being certainly not in favor Joe Biden, we have election looming around the corner Republicans are moving forward planning to hold hearings the week of October twelfth in the hopes of confirming her before Election Day. So who will motivate more? How will this affect the election really good question conservatives generally in the past have been known to be more motivated by the prospect of putting more people on the federal courts including the Supreme Court. Democrats this time though are going to be framing things I think in terms of issues they're going to be talking about the affordable care act which most Americans are in favor of most Americans like it. They'll be talking to some degree about abortion probably not as much. They'll be talking about the election though and what could happen there. They will try very hard to peel off a couple of Republican votes. It's GonNa be tough hall, and Right now it looks like Mitch McConnell has. The votes and there isn't very much the Democrats can do about it. There may be a few procedural things that can slow things down, but it is really stretching to think that the Democrats I think could could slow this down, push it after the election, and then perhaps kill the nomination that's really pie in the sky. At this point it seems both parties feel a sense of urgency here as this is a lifetime appointment here and particularly her being so young, she's only forty eight. Could be on the court for a good long time and it's unclear. You know there are some other justices who are not that young but there are a lot who are actually not that old. So you know president trump has made it a point to name. People who have probably a good couple of decades at least on the court. Are Movements now to, for instance, put term limits on justices even if that were to make it through Congress and that's that's going to be hard to do. But even if were to make it through, even if a president were to sign it, it probably wouldn't apply to justices who are already on the court. It probably would be applied going forward. There are also people who talk about expanding the court. Some people call court packing that's kind of a derisive term, but expanding the court to add two more justices or more. That's really a tough lift but these things are being talked about more than we've heard in quite a long time. VIVICA Novak. Thanks again. Thank you.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Supreme Court Vivica Novak Seventh Circuit Court Of Appea Justice Roberts President Trump Amy Conybeare Justice Scalia Barrett United States White House Mitch Mcconnell Joe Biden Chicago Mark Editor Notre Dame
"amy conybeare" Discussed on 850 WFTL

850 WFTL

02:51 min | 3 years ago

"amy conybeare" Discussed on 850 WFTL

"I love that was well worth the five bucks for it. This is we're going to give you a daily update. I think it's a legit question. What day are we on fifty five today? Fifty five days. No one has seen a supreme court Justice in public. I'm sure somebody has seen her. But it's not the average person. Maybe it's her doctor. Maybe it's her caretaker. I don't you know, who does take care does Ruth mater Ginsburg live by yourself or does she have somebody who takes care if I thought she had a husband. He died he died, and then she right? Okay. This this is a typical Ruth Bader Ginsburg died. She went to work the next day. Nothing stops her. How bad is this? So, yeah, if she hasn't been seen in public or by someone in the public eye for fifty five days where she we knew she was in the hospital for a couple of weeks, then they released her and they sent her home. But no one's seen her since then. You had a fantastic conspiracy theory Israel. Yeah. Well, just came up with the cancer treatments. Maybe she went there. She had had. Okay. Let's be honest. If I went in the hospital today. Okay. You're in much better shape than I am going to hospital today at your age, you're a little bit younger than I am and you had half of your lung removed. You would probably be out for at least a month easily me. I'd take the year off right? So okay. Get even with. Okay. But I mean at least a month. Would be home. If if not longer she's eighty five. They they were trying to say she's coming back. And I'm like, I don't think this. I don't think she's coming back this before any of this happened. She was falling asleep at the address member and the proper up come on. Now. It's a serious thing. I mean, she's an older woman. Let's be honest. And and I'm actually surprised they operate out at the age. She's at they did I don't know whether this an indication of anything, but they did ask the president yesterday to come up with a couple of top choices for next nominee. And we all know it's going to be Amy Conybeare next. She was going to be before cavenaugh because they thought he was Wiki clean and. So what if he invites Amy Conybeare it to this state of the union address? Oh, jeez. Sits right behind the justices. You see an empty seat there or Ruth and Amy's just like tapping her watch. Oh your rule. Rumors. She's actually rehearsing her dance moves to join maroon five. No. She won't be able to get it back. She. She's not coming back up for that one. Yeah. That controversy by the way, it has overtaken Super Bowl talk and the clown show that was Roger Goodell's press conference yesterday. Oh, and you're gonna explain that. What did this kid do to Tom Brady got fired? Some guy got fired and Pittsburgh. Yeah. What was that about all.

Amy Conybeare Ruth Bader Ginsburg Ruth mater Ginsburg Tom Brady Roger Goodell Israel Ruth Pittsburgh president Fifty five days fifty five days