40 Burst results for "24 Hours"
The Mason Minute
Movie Marathons (MM #4633)
"I realize the way we watch television has changed a lot over recent years, and it's all because of the streaming services. But I really think they overdid things over the holiday weekend, where a lot of the channels were running marathons of holiday movies. I know a lot of it was TBS and TNT, but they ran 24 -hour straight versions of Elf and Christmas Vacation and Christmas Story, and I know I'm forgetting a few, but a lot of Christmas programming over the Thanksgiving weekend. Now, I understand why they do this. In years past, marathons were kind of left to the days when people weren't really watching. For example, Christmas Story has been running a marathon every Christmas Eve to Christmas Day for decades now. But it looks like we're going to be seeing more of that because we can watch Christmas Story year -round now. We can watch any movie, any TV show, year -round. People aren't watching cable TV or the TV networks quite as much, so they're looking for ways to get people excited. It's easy, it's cheap. How many more times can you watch a Christmas Story, Elf, or even Christmas Vacation? Just a matter of time for some channels or 24 -hour marathons all the time.
Bloomberg Surveillance
Fresh update on "24 hours" discussed on Bloomberg Surveillance
"Attend today's service in for Atlanta former First Lady Rosalynn Carter. It follows yesterday's procession in America's Georgia to the Carter Center for a ceremony paying tribute to Mrs. Carter. Her grandson Jason Carter spoke about life her with former President Jimmy Carter. They did the things they did in their lives but they came back to this place where they lived and loved and they didn't change. Former President Carter who is in hospice care plans to attend today's service in Atlanta. Today the Supreme Court will consider the limits of double jeopardy and whether a criminal defendant can be prosecuted again for a similar crime after they were previously acquitted. A case in Georgia is testing the reach of that principle where a state jury acquitted mentally a ill man of first degree murder by reason of insanity but at the same time found him guilty of felony murder and aggravated assault. Live from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios. This is global news 24 hours a day and whenever you want it with Bloomberg News Now. I'm Michael Barr and this is Bloomberg. But we know the prices are still too high for too many things. That times are still too tough for too many families. We made but progress we have more work to do. Let me be clear to any corporation that's not brought their prices back down even as inflation has come down. Even the supply chains have been rebuilt. It's time to stop the price gouging. The President of the United States there at the White House as he launches a new council on supply chain resilience. Live from New York City this morning. Good morning. Let's get to the scores in financial markets. Stayside equities negative 0 .1%. Yields up Texas point a break of 440 in the last 24 hours. Yields lower yesterday 439 .82 on 10 a US -year. In the FX market a euro just
The Mason Minute
Movie Marathons (MM #4633)
"I realize the way we watch television has changed a lot over recent years, and it's all because of the streaming services. But I really think they overdid things over the holiday weekend, where a lot of the channels were running marathons of holiday movies. I know a lot of it was TBS and TNT, but they ran 24 -hour straight versions of Elf and Christmas Vacation and Christmas Story, and I know I'm forgetting a few, but a lot of Christmas programming over the Thanksgiving weekend. Now, I understand why they do this. In years past, marathons were kind of left to the days when people weren't really watching. For example, Christmas Story has been running a marathon every Christmas Eve to Christmas Day for decades now. But it looks like we're going to be seeing more of that because we can watch Christmas Story year -round now. We can watch any movie, any TV show, year -round. People aren't watching cable TV or the TV networks quite as much, so they're looking for ways to get people excited. It's easy, it's cheap. How many more times can you watch a Christmas Story, Elf, or even Christmas Vacation? Just a matter of time for some channels or 24 -hour marathons all the time.
The Mason Minute
Fresh update on "24 hours" discussed on The Mason Minute
"I realize the way we watch television has changed a lot over recent years, and it's all because of the streaming services. But I really think they overdid things over the holiday weekend, where a lot of the channels were running marathons of holiday movies. I know a lot of it was TBS and TNT, but they ran 24 -hour straight versions of Elf and Christmas Vacation and Christmas Story, and I know I'm forgetting a few, but a lot of Christmas programming over the Thanksgiving weekend. Now, I understand why they do this. In years past, marathons were kind of left to the days when people weren't really watching. For example, Christmas Story has been running a marathon every Christmas Eve to Christmas Day for decades now. But it looks like we're going to be seeing more of that because we can watch Christmas Story year -round now. We can watch any movie, any TV show, year -round. People aren't watching cable TV or the TV networks quite as much, so they're looking for ways to get people excited. It's easy, it's cheap. How many more times can you watch a Christmas Story, Elf, or even Christmas Vacation? Just a matter of time for some channels or 24 -hour marathons all the time.
Daddy Issues Podcast
Chris Reflects on His Incredible Bond With His Daughter
"Now, how is your daughter handling all this? Three years old, is she doing the sleepovers like great? Because I know you've only had a couple. So I just had my first sleepover, not last Wednesday, but the Wednesday before. So I've never had a time in which I haven't seen my daughter except when they withheld her. So it was like a month or two during that time. But no matter what, I was always, always seeing my daughter every Monday, Wednesday, Friday in the middle of the day, and every other Saturday and Sunday consistently. Never missed any time unless they were the ones withholding. And so, you know, the time difference has been difficult because like you're constantly back and forth dropping off. But for the most part, we have an amazing bond. Like I don't know if it's necessarily really affected her because the first overnight, not a single problem. Like she was like in heaven being here with Daddy. Like she has her own bed and I'm like, are you going to go sleep in your own bed? Are you going to sleep in, where do you want to sleep? And it's like, I'm going to sleep in Daddy's bed. I was like, but don't you want to try your bed out? I'll lay down, but I'm going to sleep in Daddy's bed. And like she just like sprawled out and she was like laying horizontal like my dog on the pillows. And it was like just, it was really adorable. But more importantly, like it was that whole day. I had 24 hours with her where like I wasn't in a rush to do anything. I just, I got to go about my normal day and I had her with me and she was so happy. And just spending the day with Daddy and the doggies and just, it was just so much fun. And then she's now looking forward to it because now she knows Wednesday's on my overnights. But then, you know, October is going to come really quick and now I'm going to have every Wednesday and every Friday. So it's really, it really was something else having her just the entire time without having to negotiate a time back and forth. And part of my negotiating now is like, you know, October is going to be an odd month for the other party because I have her every Friday. Which doesn't give her a weekend. And so I even offered, like, you know, here I am, like, I'm like, listen, you don't have a full weekend. If you want, I'll move the weekends that I don't have her and I'll move that Friday to a different day during the week. I'll have her different, a different day during the week for the overnight and then you'll have a full weekend with her. She still hasn't even responded to that. And that's what's crazy because most men, even me, like I talk about that stuff and I'm like, you're not only compromising for your daughter. But you're also compromising for your, your ex to make her life easier and have her be able to have your daughter on the weekends and things like that. It's like, why would you not try to get along and do that stuff? You know, again, it's, it's, and I, and I've always said this, I said this to everybody, it's not necessarily the ex. Her and I, if you take away the family core thing, her and I have always gotten along really well. It's her mother that's controlling her. She is, she is a pretty amazing person if you take away the grandmother. And so it's the grandmother making these decisions and not her. So like her, her option is either listen to the grandmother and just don't communicate at all, which is what, that's been her strategy this whole time. Is she doesn't have to cooperate because the courts have made the least amount of decisions possible until now. Now she knows that the court is like, you know, it was just a huge bombshell. I did not expect a 50 50 physical custody agreement. Like I did not, I was like mind blown. I just, I was like everyone on my side cause I had people there of course it was like crying. They're like, I'm in tears. Everyone's in tears. They're like, what just happened? It's like, what on earth just happened? Like, you know, I, I just, I just finished a criminal accusation which was indicted and you know, the judge, I actually, there was, there was a pretty big bombshell actually that happened. So part of my PTI is I need to get a psychological evaluation. But part of the transcripts that I showed you before is the judge wanted her to get a psychological evaluation, which basically was us like in 2021. But then the judge backpedaled because my attorney at the time was like, well, the burden of proof is on her. So if you want us to do a psychological evaluation, she should pay for it. And the judge completely backpedaled. She's like, Oh, well she doesn't have support. So how do you expect her to pay for it? Well, you're the one who wanted the evaluation. Okay, we're not going to issue the evaluation. But imagine if an evaluation was issued then how much, how, how nothing else possibly would have happened. I probably never would have been wrongfully accused of a crime. Like she would have been forced to co -parent or I would have had more, more parenting rights or more time with my daughter and she would have had, she would have been forced to co -parent.
Bloomberg Daybreak
Fresh update on "24 hours" discussed on Bloomberg Daybreak
"Stories on Musk and his empire. It's all one big universe. You just work for Elon Ing. From Bloomberg Business Week, this is Elon Ing. Listen wherever you get your podcasts. Markets headlines and breaking news 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com, on Bloomberg Television and the Bloomberg Business app. This is a Bloomberg Business Flash. 540 on Wall Street. I'm Karen Moscow. Time now for the Bloomberg ETF report. Mr. Confidence finally returning to emerging markets as equities and bonds rally this month. That's luring fresh capital into exchange -traded funds that revolve around the asset class. Net deposits into US -listed
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 15:00 11-14-2023 15:00
"I don't like you, because you can prescribe yourself. Oh, wait a minute. They're going to get up again. Hold the mic. You have time. This is what the American people are seeing today instead of an effort to fund the government, which apparently also will happen before this day is over. Yeah, about an hour and a half, Joe. 420. Is there another one? There was a third one, right? That's the vote. Yeah. We'll talk about it on Balance of Power later. Meet Kayleigh and I, Balance of Power, Bloomberg TV, five o 'clock, because Bloomberg Business Week starts right now. Broadcasting 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com and the Bloomberg Business Act, this is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week, insight from the reporters and editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business finance and tech news as it happens. Bloomberg Business Week with Karol Masur and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio. And a very good afternoon, everybody, live from the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio on YouTube and Bloomberg Originals, Karol Masur, Tim Stenebeck, Tuesday, November 14th. Everything is totally awesome. Yeah. I mean, as long as CPI comes in just a tenth of a percentage point below what analysts had expected, Karol. But everybody was expecting another maybe, you know. Then it's all good. I know. It's all good. Hey, listen, check it out. I mean, S &P 500 rally on track for its tenth day to close above its 200 -day moving average markets and a Fed that could be possibly, maybe, let's ask, Alice in Wonderland could be done. I don't know. But it's top of mind this Tuesday. We're going to get into the trade in just a moment. One thing, though, Tim, worrying global investors or has certainly been on the minds of U .S. investors, maybe everybody, is U .S. bonds and the U .S. fiscal house specifically. So on that, we are expecting a U .S. house vote on a temporary funding plan later today. Folks, we're not done yet.
Bloomberg Daybreak Europe
Fresh update on "24 hours" discussed on Bloomberg Daybreak Europe
"Markets, headlines and breaking news 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com, on Bloomberg Television and the Bloomberg Business App. This very good morning if you just joining us it's 9 40 a .m. here in the City of London. I'm Lizzie Burden. We check the markets for you all day long here on Bloomberg Radio and it's risk o off 10 % the DAX pretty flat and the FTSE 250 down half a percent as well if you look across Europe and break it down by sector you've got four out of 20 in the green only energy's leading the gains that's up four tenths of a percent followed by utilities and banks but bottom
The Bitboy Crypto Podcast
A highlight from XRP ETF SCAM (Crypto Whales Dump $2.2 Billion)
"XRP ETF. First, it was just a glimmer of hope. And then it was a rumor. And then it was confirmed. It was confirmed to be a fake rumor. What was going on in the markets? If you're alive with those ATB, you're a part of that emotional roller coaster. We're going to cover all that and more as Discover Crypto. I was in a glass box of emotions, everybody. How are we all doing today? Make sure you go and hit that like button. We got Tim and Rodney on the ones and twos today. Tim, he's going to help us cover some of this macro news here. You're more in tune with the Jay, the Chirpow and what's going on with that. Also, you can help decipher the charts with XRP. What was going on with that, guys? It was very, very volatile. And then we got Rodney. He's going to break down some stuff with Grok. That's right. Now you got another meme coin for us, right? No, it's just Grok. We're back again today, baby. Holding it down for the DJs. Speaking of coming back, what was that one of the top gainers we had for the past 24 hours in the top 10? The last 24 hours? I think it was Matic. Yeah, Matic's been shining, getting up. It got to $0 .98. So almost to that dollar, got rejected right there. What coin did I live by on the stream yesterday? It was Matic, everybody. So I'm feeling good about that one. I'm going to go ahead and dislocate my shoulder from patting myself on the back so much. Chat, make sure you give that like. We got a lot of people in here today, DCA and Prey. He sees the special background. All right, everybody. But first, we're going to cover that XRP news. Tim, did you see the charts? Were you live looking at it? What was your emotions at the time? We were wrapping out the show on Investing Bros. So it was like Investing Bros. We got the best clothes. We got jewelry and all the... We're literally like, all right, guys, we're wrapping out the show today. And then all of a sudden, XRP jumps up above 70 cents and then it jumps above 70 and it just keeps going. And so we end up having to run a little long. You usually get off that four so that everyone goes over to ATB. But, you know, we had to run a little long and we just went nuts with it. Went all the way up. Did we end up... That's before. I'm on the daily chart. Where do we end up getting to with the top? I think we closed down. We hadn't yet come down.
Bloomberg Daybreak Europe
Fresh update on "24 hours" discussed on Bloomberg Daybreak Europe
"More closely and investing with the confidence of over a century of experience. Creating new opportunities that rely on innovation, preserving capital and come from deep insights. Put the power of Oppenheimer thinking into your investing. Up this in school. Oh, did you now? OK, what's first? Smokey Bear said to first drown it with a bucket of water, then stir it with a shovel. Wow, you sound just like him. If it's still warm, then do it again. Where can I learn all this? It's all on smokeybear .com with your prevention wildfire tips, because only you can prevent wildfires brought to you by the USDA Forest Service, your state forester and the Ad Council. Markets headlines and breaking news 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com on Bloomberg Television and the Bloomberg Business app. This story is term target of higher cash flow and return
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 12:00 11-14-2023 12:00
"Business stories aren't just about business, they're also about policy, politics, finance, and more. With Bloomberg, you stay informed on global coverage that connects the dots. The Bloomberg mobile app now features Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, so you can get the latest live radio, podcasts, and audio articles in the car. Download the Bloomberg mobile app now to get started. Find it in the Apple App Store or on Google Play. Bloomberg in -car apps are sponsored by Interactive Brokers. Broadcasting 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com and the Bloomberg Business Act. This is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Markets with Paul Sweeney and Matt Miller. Why were the economists so wrong? What are the economists getting wrong? Isn't this a slam dunk time to buy U .S. treasuries? Soft landing, hard landing, no landing. I don't know. True. What the heck does that mean? I don't know. Breaking Market News. An insight from Bloomberg experts. We're going to be in an environment with higher rates for longer. The five day in office work week is effectively dead. It's definitely a good sign that we're not ready to land this economy just yet. This is Bloomberg Markets with Paul Sweeney and Matt Miller on Bloomberg Radio. All right, coming up in this hour, we're going to break down those Home Depot earnings. We do that with Drew Redding. He's a research analyst, covers all the builders and all that adjacent stuff where Bloomberg Intelligence. Plus, we're going to have our C -suite conversation today with Jerome Silvain, CFO at Dexcom. Talk about that company, its initiatives in healthcare, specifically for diabetes. Dude, they've done well, even in the face, at least yesterday, in the face of the Ozempic results. I thought it was really interesting that that stock was able to rally. They were up almost 5 % yesterday.
CoinDesk Podcast Network
A highlight from MARKETS DAILY: Crypto Update | Rising Venture Capital Investment in Crypto
"This episode of Markets Daily is sponsored by CME Group and PayPal. It's Tuesday, November 14th, 2023, and this is Markets Daily from CoinDesk. My name is Noelle Acheson, CoinDesk collaborator and author of the Crypto as Macro Now newsletter on Substat. On today's show, we're talking about new inflows into the crypto ecosystem, inflation, and more. So you don't miss an episode, be sure to follow the podcast on your platform of choice and turn on notifications. And just a reminder, CoinDesk is a news source and does not provide investment advice. Now, a markets roundup. Crypto prices were heading down earlier today, but then we got some good news on the US inflation. I'll talk more about this in a moment. This has turned the mood around, with many assets clawing back some of the day's losses. According to CoinDesk indices, at 9 a .m. Eastern time today, Bitcoin was trading at $36 ,546, down almost 1 % over the past 24 hours, although up 1 .5 % over the past hour alone. Ether was trading down 0 .75 % over the past 24 hours at $2 ,043. Elsewhere, Cosmos, Filecoin, and the Lido DAO token were down 9%. Solana and Polkadot were down 3 .5%. Ripple's XRP token had an interesting day yesterday. A tweet reported that BlackRock had filed for an XRP trust in Delaware. This was taken as a sign that the asset manager was planning to file a proposal for a spot XRP ETF, and the asset jumped 12 % in just a few minutes. The news turned out to be fake, however. I mean, it's very, very unlikely BlackRock would file for an ETF based on asset that not only doesn't have a CME derivatives market, but is still in active securities litigation. Needless to say, the XRP price corrected sharply shortly after, with both moves triggering significant losses in derivatives positions. Earlier today, XRP was still up over the past 24 hours, but only around 1%. In macro indicators, the US inflation data for the month of October is in. And it came in soft, which is very good news. To recap, in September, the headline CP index increased by 3 .7%, and consensus estimates for October pointed to a 3 .3 % increase. That itself would have been good. But the number came in even softer, at 3 .2%. Even more relevant for the US Federal Reserve is the Core CPI index, since this strips out the volatile components of food and energy. In September, Core CPI jumped by 4 .1 % year on year, and expectations were for that rate of increase to hold steady in October. The actual figure came in at 4 .0%, the smallest increase since September 2021. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, shelter accounted for the bulk of the increase in the Core Inflation Index, but much less so than expected. And it seems lower energy prices are also doing their bit. On a monthly basis, Core CPI grew by 0 .2%, less than expected. This brings the three -month average monthly gain down to 0 .3%, lower than last year's average of 0 .5%. The average needs to come down further to give the Fed some breathing room, but it is progress. A US rate hike at the December FOMC meeting was unlikely anyway, given market tension, geopolitical fragility, and the likelihood of a government shutdown starting this weekend. This release now takes that totally off the table. As we head into record, US yields are heading down fast, with the 10 -year Treasury yield plummeting as investors were holding their breath for the inflation report. The good news in the figures has given the market a jolt of energy, with futures pointing to a very strong open. European indices were more positive yesterday, with the FTSE 100 up 0 .9%, the German DAX up 0 .6%, and the Euro Stoxx 600 up 0 .75%. The US figures are extending this trend for the DAX and the as investors digest the UK cabinet reshuffle. In Asia, stocks were cautiously positive today, with both Japan's Nikkei index and China's Shanghai Composite climbing 0 .3 % and the Hang Seng losing almost 0 .2%. In commodities, oil continues to head up, despite a report out this morning from the International Energy Agency that insists global oil markets won't be as tight as expected this quarter. The agency recognizes that demand is growing, as OPEC said yesterday, but non -OPEC supply apparently is growing even more. The market doesn't seem convinced yet, however, and the Brent crude benchmark is up 0 .4 on the day, trading at $83 .67 a barrel. After falling more than 1 % yesterday, gold today is benefiting from a drop in the $DXY index, as US yields digest the good inflation figures. Earlier today, gold was trading up over 0 .5 % at $1 ,956 per ounce. Stay with us. After the break, we're going to talk about new crypto investment.
Markets Daily Crypto Roundup
A highlight from Crypto Update | Rising Venture Capital Investment in Crypto
"This episode of Markets Daily is sponsored by CME Group and PayPal. It's Tuesday, November 14th, 2023, and this is Markets Daily from CoinDesk. My name is Noelle Acheson, CoinDesk collaborator and author of the Crypto as Macro Now newsletter on Substat. On today's show, we're talking about new inflows into the crypto ecosystem, inflation, and more. So you don't miss an episode, be sure to follow the podcast on your platform of choice and turn on notifications. And just a reminder, CoinDesk is a news source and does not provide investment advice. Now, a markets roundup. Crypto prices were heading down earlier today, but then we got some good news on the US inflation. I'll talk more about this in a moment. This has turned the mood around, with many assets clawing back some of the day's losses. According to CoinDesk indices, at 9 a .m. Eastern time today, Bitcoin was trading at $36 ,546, down almost 1 % over the past 24 hours, although up 1 .5 % over the past hour alone. Ether was trading down 0 .75 % over the past 24 hours at $2 ,043. Elsewhere, Cosmos, Filecoin, and the Lido DAO token were down 9%. Solana and Polkadot were down 3 .5%. Ripple's XRP token had an interesting day yesterday. A tweet reported that BlackRock had filed for an XRP trust in Delaware. This was taken as a sign that the asset manager was planning to file a proposal for a spot XRP ETF, and the asset jumped 12 % in just a few minutes. The news turned out to be fake, however. I mean, it's very, very unlikely BlackRock would file for an ETF based on asset that not only doesn't have a CME derivatives market, but is still in active securities litigation. Needless to say, the XRP price corrected sharply shortly after, with both moves triggering significant losses in derivatives positions. Earlier today, XRP was still up over the past 24 hours, but only around 1%. In macro indicators, the US inflation data for the month of October is in. And it came in soft, which is very good news. To recap, in September, the headline CP index increased by 3 .7%, and consensus estimates for October pointed to a 3 .3 % increase. That itself would have been good. But the number came in even softer, at 3 .2%. Even more relevant for the US Federal Reserve is the Core CPI index, since this strips out the volatile components of food and energy. In September, Core CPI jumped by 4 .1 % year on year, and expectations were for that rate of increase to hold steady in October. The actual figure came in at 4 .0%, the smallest increase since September 2021. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, shelter accounted for the bulk of the increase in the Core Inflation Index, but much less so than expected. And it seems lower energy prices are also doing their bit. On a monthly basis, Core CPI grew by 0 .2%, less than expected. This brings the three -month average monthly gain down to 0 .3%, lower than last year's average of 0 .5%. The average needs to come down further to give the Fed some breathing room, but it is progress. A US rate hike at the December FOMC meeting was unlikely anyway, given market tension, geopolitical fragility, and the likelihood of a government shutdown starting this weekend. This release now takes that totally off the table. As we head into record, US yields are heading down fast, with the 10 -year Treasury yield plummeting as investors were holding their breath for the inflation report. The good news in the figures has given the market a jolt of energy, with futures pointing to a very strong open. European indices were more positive yesterday, with the FTSE 100 up 0 .9%, the German DAX up 0 .6%, and the Euro Stoxx 600 up 0 .75%. The US figures are extending this trend for the DAX and the as investors digest the UK cabinet reshuffle. In Asia, stocks were cautiously positive today, with both Japan's Nikkei index and China's Shanghai Composite climbing 0 .3 % and the Hang Seng losing almost 0 .2%. In commodities, oil continues to head up, despite a report out this morning from the International Energy Agency that insists global oil markets won't be as tight as expected this quarter. The agency recognizes that demand is growing, as OPEC said yesterday, but non -OPEC supply apparently is growing even more. The market doesn't seem convinced yet, however, and the Brent crude benchmark is up 0 .4 on the day, trading at $83 .67 a barrel. After falling more than 1 % yesterday, gold today is benefiting from a drop in the $DXY index, as US yields digest the good inflation figures. Earlier today, gold was trading up over 0 .5 % at $1 ,956 per ounce. Stay with us. After the break, we're going to talk about new crypto investment.
Cryptocurrency for Beginners: with Crypto Casey
A highlight from Crypto Wallet How to Transfer Crypto from Exchange (Tangem Wallet 2.0 Review ) New Features!
"We are going to become our own bank, our own security system. We are going to 100 % own and have complete control over our digital assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Altcoins, and other cryptocurrencies and NFTs all in less than 90 seconds right now. This is the latest version of Tangent Wallet, a multi -currency, multi -chain cryptocurrency wallet that is the size of a credit card, the most affordable cold storage hardware wallet, and extremely easy to set up and use. Check it out. Opening the box here, we have the three cards with a new sleek matte black design. Next, installing the correct and official Tangent Mobile app on our phones and opening the app, tap Scan Card and touch one of the cards to your phone like so. Next, tap Create Wallet and tap the card to your phone again. Nice. Now that we have a wallet, let's create backups of it. Tap Backup Now and then tap Add a Backup Card and tap the second card to your phone. Cool. Now tap Add a Backup Card again and tap the third card to your phone. Then tap Finalize the Backup Process. And now we need to create an access code to secure the wallets. Tap Continue and then type in whatever word, phrase, numbers, or combination of text you want to use to access your wallet. Re -enter it to verify the access code and then scan the primary card ending in the corresponding numbers on the screen that matches that card, holding you up to your phone until the operation is complete. Then repeat this process for the two backup cards. Sweet! Now your Tangent wallet has been configured and is ready for use. Now we can continue to the wallet, check out the mobile app, learn how to use it safely and securely, and then move some crypto to it. Hello, I'm Crypto Casey and in this video we are going to go over the new features of Tangent's latest wallet and how we can transfer crypto off of exchanges to completely own and control it with this cold storage hardware wallet. Let's hit it! Here is Tangent's original wallet we fully reviewed together on the channel, which you can check out by clicking on the link above. And this is their latest sleek matte black design with some interesting new features. Side by side, both cards are the same shape and size, however the new one is more sturdy with some nice weight to it. Tangent compiled a list of the most requested features by users and implemented them in their new Tangent wallet card. One of the main differences being three different options for private key generation versus only one. So in addition to using the certified true random number generator, TRNG, which generates and stores the keys inside the card's chips, where neither Tangent nor anyone else can see what it is and no copies exist in space and time outside of the Tangent wallet cards. Now with the new wallet cards, we have the option of generating a seed phrase with the Tangent mobile app and importing it to the cards, and also the option of importing an existing seed phrase from another wallet. Cool stuff. So it's important to note that if we create the wallet without the seed phrase option, generating a seed phrase will not be possible later. So we need to carefully consider the pros and cons of each option and decide which one we are most comfortable with long term. Tangent creates a seed phrase through their app on your phone, a hot device connected to the internet, which is not ideal if your phone has malware on it has been compromised or similar. So if we do decide to create a seed phrase for our Tangent wallet, or if we decide to import a seed phrase from an existing wallet, consider disconnecting from any Wi -Fi networks and switching your phone into airplane mode to make sure the process is more secure. Do not take a screenshot of the seed phrase. Instead, write it down on a few pieces of paper to store securely in different locations in case of something like a fire, flood or similar, and then get something more durable than paper immediately for the long term. There are some great offline options for storing the private keys like the crypto steel capsule solo offered by Ledger. This is a solid steel capsule to protect your seed phrase designed to resist extreme conditions. And the BILFODL also is offered by Ledger. BILFODL is a solid steel case to store and protect your seed phrase designed to resist fire, water and more. With cold wallets like Ledger and Trezor devices, the creation of the 12 or 24 word seed phrase is done offline, which is more ideal and secure. However, vulnerabilities and security risks are still present because, as we've discussed in several videos on the channel, if anyone has access to your seed phrase, like if they came across them written on a piece of paper or had access to a Ledger crypto steel capsule or BILFODL with the seed phrase, or if you stored it on a device that can be hacked like your computer, cell phone, or if a scammer tricks you by pretending to be Ledger, Trezor or similar, sending you a fake email or directing you to a fake site and instruct you to give them your seed phrase by lying and saying your funds need to be recovered or something like that, then all the funds on your wallet will be gone. So seed phrases are designed to help us with self custody and to manage our cryptocurrencies and digital assets more easily and restore any lost access to our funds. However, like we just discussed, there are risks. And even if you decided to try and remember it by heart or mix up some of the words, if you unfortunately suffered a brain injury, memory lapse or similar, that's also a risk of completely losing access to your funds. So think about this. Cryptocurrency private keys are generated by elaborate mathematical algorithms where data is encrypted many, many times using a huge amount of computing power. And then the most important key is then just converted into a 12 word seed phrase that can be used by anyone anywhere at any time to steal everything. Right. Important things to consider. So do your own research and never put your eggs or crypto all in one basket or even several of the same types of baskets. Diversification in investments is just as important as diversification of the same type of assets, like spreading cash into several different banks and spreading crypto across different types of wallets. Diversify some digital assets into seed phrase based cold storage hardware wallets like Ledger and Trezor and also diversify some digital assets in different technologically based wallets like BC Vault or Tangent Wallet. With Tangent Wallet, instead of a seed phrase as the only way to backup our cryptocurrency, backup copies of the wallet are created and used on the other Tangent Wallet cards. So let's say we have our Tangent Wallet card and two backup cards. We can store them in different geographical locations in case we need to restore access to our digital assets. And if anyone happens to come across the card or steals the card and even downloads the Tangent Wallet app and tries to access our funds, an additional security layer is necessary, which is where we encrypt our wallets with an access code by creating our unique series of numbers or letters or similar to a PIN code or passphrase. And to protect the wallet from brute force attacks, after each wrong password attempt, an increasing amount of time delay between each attempt is executed. So our crypto remains secure. Amazing. The other new features we will explore apply to both the first and latest versions of the Tangent cards as updates to the Tangent Mobile Wallet app and overall user experience. This includes a new dark mode where we can navigate through the mobile app comfortably in low light environments. So it's easier on the eyes when using it at night or in the dark. It also looks a lot cooler as you can see here on some screenshots. With the new update, we can now sort and group our cryptocurrencies and tokens however we want, whether it be by balance, by blockchain network, like cryptocurrencies on the Ethereum network versus Polygon or similar, or manually in whatever order we prefer to see them. Tangent added an extra layer of protection with an option to hide our balances when the app is open to keep our crypto holdings more discreet without us having to sacrifice convenience if others are close by and can see our phone screen. And they also added an option to turn off access code recovery, which increases security. We can now monitor price changes over the past 24 hours of all of our assets directly in the app to help us make informed decisions during crazy dynamic markets. There is rapid access to buying, selling or hiding a token by tapping and holding it on the home screen. Bitcoin and Ethereum transaction histories also display directly in the app without us having to check third parties like Block Explorer, Etherscan or similar. And Tangent is working on adding more blockchain networks in future updates. Tangent now offers 24x7x365 support so they can answer any questions we may have or guide us on how to properly do crypto transactions with Tangent Wallet no matter what time it is or what time zone we are in, which is huge for beginners just getting in the space. More features are on the horizon like a market data feature directly inside the app, an address book, cross -chain swaps, staking and more support for more blockchains. Brilliant. Now let's transfer some cryptocurrencies off of exchanges to our Tangent Wallet together so we can get more comfortable with the process as well as transfer some back to the exchange to practice for our profit -taking strategy in the next bull run, which you can learn more about in this video guide by clicking on the link above. And after that, we will learn how to connect our Tangent Wallets to Web3 applications like Morales Money, a platform for finding undervalued altcoins before they pump in the next bull cycle. So stay tuned to the very end to learn more about becoming your own bank with complete control and ownership over your digital asset investments simply and easily with Tangent Wallet and a very important free tool we can use when interfacing with Web3 to further protect our funds. Nice. Let's move some Bitcoin we have on our Coinbase account off of the exchange together to hold in our very own cold storage hardware wallet, Tangent Wallet. Open the Tangent app, tap scan card, scan the card, and enter the access code. Scan the card again. And from here on the dashboard, press and hold Bitcoin, then tap copy address. Next, open the Coinbase exchange app, tap the send button, tap Bitcoin, paste the Tangent Bitcoin wallet address into the to field, and tap continue. Enter the amount of Bitcoin we want to send. I always recommend sending a small amount as a test first to make sure everything is good to go. So in this case, we are sending $100 worth of Bitcoin. Tap preview, make sure everything looks good, then tap send now, and it's on its way. In a few minutes or so, when we open our Tangent Wallet app, we will see the $100 worth of Bitcoin that we now completely own and control. Repeat the same process for any other type of cryptocurrency by copying the corresponding address on Tangent Wallet, also making sure we select the right network. Like for example, with Tether, there are many other available networks like Ethereum versus BNB Smart Chain versus Solana and more. And then repeat the same similar process on any other exchange we may have crypto on by using the send function, pasting the address in the recipient field, and checking to make sure everything looks good before sending. The process is actually much easier and simpler than most people think that are new to crypto. And it's a lot like riding a bike. I can try to explain how to ride a bike to you, show you how to ride a bike, and you can read about riding a bike. However, at the end of the day, you need to get on the bike and ride it for yourself to learn. So start practicing transferring to and from different exchanges and wallets to prepare for the next face -melting bull cycle so you can take profits and potentially change your life with some nice gains. And if you want to explore a simple tool any of us can reference to increase the probability of us making gains by buying and selling altcoins at the right time, check out this video guide all about the Morales Moneyline charting tool by clicking on the link above. Great. Now let's transfer crypto from our Tangent Wallet back to Coinbase exchange to practice for when we want to lock in profits by converting it to fiat and transferring it to our bank accounts. Note that you can take profit in stablecoins directly on the Tangent Wallet app without transferring it by tapping on the token, tapping exchange, entering the amount, and tapping swap. There's also an option to sell for fiat using moon pay if we tap sell. However, you will have to set up an account with them which is a good idea so we have multiple options to trade and sell crypto when the market is hot as some exchanges get overwhelmed, freeze transactions, prevent withdrawals, etc. So open the Coinbase exchange app, tap receive, select the crypto, for example Ethereum on the Ethereum network, tap copy, then open the Tangent Wallet app. On the dashboard, tap and hold Ethereum, then tap send. Paste the Ethereum network wallet address from Coinbase in the address field. Select the amount of Ether to send, which as usual start with a small amount to test first to make sure it works, then tap send. After a few minutes or so, depending on how busy the network or exchange are, it will show up on the exchange and from there you can sell it for your country's currency and then transfer it to your bank account. Amazing. Now let's connect our Tangent Wallet to a Web3 application so we can start using decentralized platforms like Morales Money. But first it's extremely important to make sure we are accessing the correct and official sites as well as understanding exactly what is going to happen when we sign transactions to avoid losing all of our funds from a scammer or hacker using a free browser extension called WalletGuard. I've been using it over the past year and it's been working great, popping up warnings, helping check everything out before transacting, so it's definitely worth checking out and giving it a go whether we are new or experienced in the space. For example, if we start interacting with smart contracts like for minting NFTs, when accessing the site, WalletGuard's phishing protection layer executes and warns you if the website might be harmful, if it was created recently, and if it has a low trust score and if we do proceed to do so with caution. And when we do, before attempting to verify a transaction with our wallet, a second layer of protection is executed with a clear human readable warning about what exactly will happen if you decide to proceed with a transaction, like if it's going to drain your wallet instead of actually mint an NFT. This feature alone would have saved me from losing over $20 ,000 when minting an NFT on a fake lookalike website back in the last bull cycle. Absolutely insane. It can also detect and will notify you if the site is making multiple attempts to interact with your wallet, trying to hack and steal funds. So, WalletGuard is a must have as a crypto investor, so make sure to scroll down and use the link below to access the correct and official site to download WalletGuard's free extension to protect your wallet and crypto assets today. Seriously, it takes like 10 seconds and if you'd like to see a video guide all about how it works, click on the link above. Nice. Now that we've got an added layer of protection to keep our wallets and funds more secure when interacting with Web3 apps, let's learn how to connect our Tangem wallet to a Web3 app called Morales Money. Make sure to use the link in the description area below to access the correct and official site, as well as redeem any special offers they have for us. Before connecting, open the Tangem app, tap Manage Tokens at the bottom, tap BNB and make sure the BNB Beacon Chain and BNB Smart Chain options are enabled. That way the connection to Morales Money platform goes more smoothly. Using the link below, when we arrive at the site, we can see a screen full of crypto bubbles that show us which altcoins are up versus down in the latest price action. And in the top right hand corner, click on the Sign Up Login button, then click Login via Wallet. Here we can see a secure login screen where we can click Connect, then click on the option called Wallet Connect here, and then we will see this QR code. Next, open the Tangem wallet app, tap on the three dots in the top right hand corner of the screen, then tap Wallet Connect, tap the Add icon in the top right hand corner, then hold your phone facing the QR code on the Morales Money screen. On the Tangem app, you will see a message, tap Start, and next on the Morales Money screen, we just need to click the Verify button. Then on the Tangem wallet app, on the message that pops up, tap Sign. Enter your access code, tap the Tangem card to your phone, and on the Morales Money screen, enter your email address, and now you're connected to the Morales Money Web3 app. This is a platform with a lot of different functionalities that helps us with finding new altcoins, trading them, and much much more, which you can learn all about in this video walkthrough by clicking on the link above. Just to give you an overview of what we can do with our Tangem wallets connected to Morales Money, we can check out our wallet balances by clicking on this profile picture in the top right hand corner and then clicking My Wallet. And here we can view all of our tokens, and under the NFT tab, we can also view any NFTs on our wallets. Nice. And on the navigation menu at the top of the screen, if we click Swap, then click on the dropdown that says Trading Account, we can click Main Account, which opens up our wallet. And if we click Swap, we can select a token to sell from our wallet to buy another token on the Ethereum, Binance, or Polygon blockchain networks. All straight on the blockchain without having to transfer tokens to and from centralized exchanges. Very neat. On Morales Money, we can also go to the Explore Coins option and choose a predetermined filter like Top Recently Minted Coins with Experienced Buyers. And if one of the tokens seems interesting and you want to gamble on some, click on it. And on the right here, we can instantly swap tokens in our wallet to the new token directly on chain. There are a ton of other interesting tools and tricks on the Morales Money platform with many more to come. So if you're interested in checking it out, be sure to scroll down and use links below to sign up. If you would like to learn more about Morales Money and how it can help us potentially make life -changing gains in altcoins, check out this video. If you would like to watch a video guide about how crypto wallets, seed phrases, and private keys work, check out this video. And to get your very own Tangent wallet, click on the link in the screen. Like and subscribe for more. Be safe out there.
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 05:00 11-14-2023 05:00
"Investment Advisors switch to interactive brokers for lowest cost global trading and turnkey custody solutions. No ticket charges and no conflicts of your interests at IBKR dot com slash RIA. This is Bloomberg Radio. From the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studios, this is Bloomberg Daybreak for Tuesday, November 14th. And Israel ramps up its ground war against Hamas. That's as Israel supporters come out in force with a march in Washington. A critical 24 hours as Congress tries to avert a government shutdown. And Joe Biden and Xi Jinping are set to announce a deal to crack down on fentanyl. Donald Trump Jr.'s testimony on the witness stand and his family civil fraud case. Plus, the Supreme Court put in place its first formal code of ethics. I'm Michael Barr. More ahead. I'm John Stash, Aaron Swartz. The Knicks lost in Boston, the Islanders lost in Edmonton Monday Night Football. The Broncos upset the bill. That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak on Bloomberg 1130 New York, Bloomberg 99 1 Washington, D .C., Bloomberg 106 1 Boston, Bloomberg 960 San Francisco, Sirius XM 121 and around the world on Bloomberg Radio dot com and via the Bloomberg Business Act. Good morning. I'm Nathan Hager and I'm Karen Moscow and U .S. stock index futures are higher this morning. S &P futures up two tenths of a percent, about nine points. Dow futures up a tenth of a percent or 40 points. NASDAQ futures up three tenths of a percent or 44 points. Ten year Treasury yield four point six one percent. Nathan, Karen, let's get you caught up on what's happening in the Middle East. The focus is turning to hospitals in Gaza, where Israel accuses Hamas of housing command centers and weapons. President Biden says the Al -Shifa hospital.
Telecom Reseller
A highlight from STIR/SHAKEN: understanding the basics, how it works, how to get compliant, ClearlyIP Podcast
"This is Doug Greenan, I'm the publisher of TR Publications and I'm very pleased to have with us Tony Lewis, who's the co -founder and CEO of Clearly IP. Tony, thank you for joining me today. Hey Doug, thanks for having me. I look forward to it. It's been a long time since we had one of these. Well, I'm delighted we were able to get together and as we were just talking about, we're very excited to have you as a new client and that we're reporting on Clearly IP. You're doing a lot of interesting things, you're creating a lot of interesting content and a lot of new ideas, I think, for our readers' thoughts about how they can approach some of the problems and challenges they've had in growing and in delivering services and so on. Today we're talking about a topic that everybody's sort of been buzzing about and has different takes on it and it'll be great to have sort of a fresh take on Stir -Shaken. Let's start with, as much as we've been reporting on it for all this time, I always feel like there's some readers out there that are almost too embarrassed to say, I don't know all I probably should know about Stir -Shaken. Let's start with some basic stuff. What does Stir -Shaken actually stand for? Oh, geez. It's an acronym. The STIR portion stands for Secure Telephony Identity Revisited. Our government loves to come up with crazy names and acronyms and then they make the acronym fit some English words that are somewhat informative of what it's doing. The STIR portion stands for Secure Telephony Identity Revisited. And here I thought it was sort of James Bond kind of deal. Yeah, exactly. And then the signature based stands for, so the SHAKEN stands for Signature Based Handling of Asserted Information Using Tokens. How that comes out to SHAKEN is you got me. Well, that's how they got there. And as we know, it kind of rolled out with a lot of fanfare and a lot of promise. So we understand it as a technology to combat spam calls and robo calls, but does it work? Sure. In principle and what it does work. So the idea behind it is the carrier who's initiating the call signs that call with a unique token. So we go through a government agency or the government agency FCC has allocated a company called iConnective as the single token authority in the US. So we as a carrier have to go to iConnective and get a token issued to us. We then use that token to go buy a, for all intents and purposes, an SSL certificate from a certificate authority. It's not an SSL cert, but it works the same way. So we buy a certificate from one of the certificate authorities. And then we use that every time we make an outbound call from a customer makes an outbound call to us, we sign that call saying, hey, we are the carrier of record for this call. So we're placing this call onto the network. And we attest to a certain level of caller ID, either an a, a b, or a c. And we can talk more about that later, what that a, b, and c means. But this process only works if the originating carrier, so whoever owns the end customer is the one who signs the call. And what we're seeing a ton of in the US is it's actually a carrier or two above the carrier who owns the customer who finally signs the call. And what we're seeing in the US, again, is the know your customer, KYC. So how can a carrier who's two layers up know the customer who actually is placing that call the end customer? And that's where it's still struggling to be effective. So you know, I have a sort of civilian question. How does this technology benefit me other than the obvious that it's supposed to stop me from receiving those annoying calls? Well, it's actually not supposed to. That's a myth. It's not supposed to stop spam calling. It's supposed to give the industry a way of quickly tracing back spam call to figure out who originated it. So let's say you have a company who's doing spam calling. Prior to stir -shaking, let's say that company buys from a reseller, their VoIP services. And that reseller buys from a aggregate who takes numerous carriers and aggregates together. And then that aggregate used a CLAC finally to place that outbound call. And then that CLAC saw, oh, that calls an AT &T wireless number, and they might go straight to AT &T with it, or they might use another intermediate party to send it to AT &T. So then the customer who receives the spam call reports to the government or to AT &T, I got this spoofing call. They tried to pretend they were my bank. So the first thing the FCC would have to do is say, okay, contact AT &T. Who sent you this call? AT &T would say, this carrier XYZ. Then they go to XYZ and say, who gave you this call? And that carrier would take a day or two or three or a week or two to respond back, I got it from this carrier here. And they have to go all the way down the chain. It would take them weeks or months to find out who actually placed that call. And half the time, some intermediate carrier would never respond back to them. And now the chain was broken, and they couldn't figure out who actually placed that spam call trying to impersonate a bank. So with stir shaking, when that call makes it AT &T, AT &T can look at which carrier signed that call and goes and report that to this company or this organization called the Traceback organization, who can immediately come to the person who signed the call and said, this call was illegal. What do you know about your customer? Give us all the information about your customer so we can figure out what we have to do to stop this. Does that make sense? It does. And so that brings up the obvious question. Does this actually work in practice? Does this happen? It does. So the problem is, remember the first question we're asking about is, one of the first things I brought up is, the problem right now is too many of the small resellers who sit between the end customer and someone else aren't doing stir shaking still. And they're too small. They're flying under the radar. The FCC doesn't even know that they exist because they're not registered with the FCC because they're flying under the radar. So you're two or three layers up still half the time when that call is finally getting signed. So when Traceback group wants to go figure out who made this spam call, they're still a lot of times one, two, three layers deep from the end customer. So you know, no system is perfect, but and stir shaking obviously has its challenges. You know, how do you guys manage this? What's the difference if I go with clearly IP? So we manage it multiple ways. So as a VoIP reseller, we sign all of our calls with our own token. And when we sign those calls, there's three different layers or three different levels of optimization. There's an A, a B, and a C. I'll simplify it. An A says, this is where the know your customer comes in. I know who my customer is. So it's not just the business name. For example, we request a copy of a photo ID for the person signing up. We log the IP address they're coming from. We do some validations on their credit card and verify that that address matches the IP address they're signing up. There's all these things we do to help verify that the customer is legit. So as the carrier, we have to do a bunch of know your customer requirements. And then once we can attest that we know our customer, we then sign that call with an A or a B. An A says, I know my customer, and I can verify they have a right to use the caller ID they're sending. B says, I know my customer, but I don't know if they have a right to use that caller ID. So in our world, a right to use a caller ID is based off of, do you own that DID, that phone number with us? If so, we know you have a right to use it. If it's a DID with someone else, we don't know if you have a right to use it, and we sign that call with a B. Does that make sense? It makes sense. And why don't you connect the dots for me to your stir shaken, with stir shaken to your SIP trunking products and offerings? Yeah, so in our world, if we're selling to an end customer, we take care of the signing of that call with an A or a B. If we have a reseller involved who owns the relationship to the customer, they're supposed to sign that call. So they don't have their own SBC. So they can't sign that call because we're the ones taking the call from their customer directly to us a lot of times with resellers. Most resellers don't put in their own SBCs. So in that world, we offer a service where they can go get their own token and certificate. They upload it to us, and we sign their calls from their customers underneath them with their own certificate. So if the resellers don't trace back, they know that the reseller who actually sold that to the end customer. So we give a really simple way. Our resellers don't have to go put in their own SBCs. They don't have to go subscribe to some stir shaken service from some third party who will sign the calls. We'll sign it for them using their certificate on their behalf. And that's a big advantage by if you work with Clearly IP then? Yes, a lot. There are a couple other providers starting to do it. We've been doing it for two years. I think we're one of the first that would let you load your own certificate. We have a little form you fill out for it, provide it all, and within 24 hours it's loaded and we're signing your calls for you. Well, Tony, I really want to thank you for joining me. This has been interesting and taking a glimpse at stir shaken. I think I really appreciate you having the patience to lay out for us some of the basics. Maybe we heard back then, but I think a lot of us civilians may have lost track of it and all the excitement, and also laying out some of the advantages that Clearly IP brings to the table. Where can we learn more about stir shaken and the Clearly IP approach to this problem? You can go to our website. We have some information on our website under our products page, under our SIP trunking on the stir shaken for our resellers underneath us. Otherwise, if you're a reseller and you have your own SPC or PBX, we can send you the whole identity header on inbound calls so that you can see the identity header and make decisions based on the identity header. Sounds like we have a lot to look forward to, Tony. We're going to move on to the next one.
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 15:00 11-13-2023 15:00
"Investment Advisors. Switch to interactive brokers for lowest cost global trading and turnkey custody solutions. No ticket charges and no conflicts of your interests at ibkr .com slash ria. When we come back here, I'm Joe Matthew in Washington along with Kaley Lyons. We'll meet you a little bit later on Balance of Power on Bloomberg TV at five o 'clock Washington time. Because Bloomberg Business Week starts right now. Broadcasting 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com and the Bloomberg Business Act. This is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week. Insight from the reporters and editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine. Plus global business finance and tech news as it happens. Bloomberg Business Week with Caro Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio. And a very good afternoon everybody. Live from the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers Studio. Streaming on YouTube and of course streaming on Bloomberg Originals. You are listening and watching Bloomberg Business Week. Caro Masser along with Tim Stenebeck. She's back. Delighted chores over the last four days. A little bit of spring fall, winter cleaning. Okay, so not as exciting as, you know, going on some international adventure for two days. No, I did not do that. And everyone's like, I thought you were on vacation. I'm like, no. Hey, Headline Just Crossing. I want to bring it to you. Starbucks Union says November 16th strike to hit hundreds of stores. So they are planning a work stoppage for November 16th. So we talk about this the year of many things, but it does feel very much like the year of unionized workers. And kind of some strength once again to the U .S. labor organizations here. Yeah, just in the last few minutes when this news broke, Starbucks shares taking a leg lower. Down about eight tenths of one percent, Carole. Thank God something's moving because Tim walked in. He's like, man, this.
CoinDesk Podcast Network
A highlight from MARKETS DAILY: Crypto Update | What JPMorgan Analysts Missed About Bitcoin's Rally
"This episode of Markets Daily is sponsored by CME Group and PayPal. So you don't miss an episode, be sure to follow the podcast on your platform of choice and turn on notifications. And just a reminder, CoinDesk is a news source and does not provide investment advice. Now a markets roundup. After the hectic activity at the end of last week as markets reacted to BlackRock's filing of an EtherSpot ETF proposal, the weekend seemed like an oasis of calm. So far today, the market looks mixed. According to Coindesk Indices, at 9 a .m. Eastern Time this morning, Bitcoin was down two thirds of a percent over the past 24 hours, trading at $36 ,873. Ether was up one third, trading at $2 ,059. Elsewhere, Filecoin was up 14%, Cosmos was up 10%, Optimism and the Lido DAO token were up 5%. Solana was down 1 % after what has been an astonishing run. Over the past week, the asset is up over 40%. You may remember that in an early October episode, I pulled out the average performance of Bitcoin for the month of October going back to 2010, which was 27%. I calculated that if Bitcoin achieved that average performance during the month, the price would reach just over $34 ,000. Well, that's pretty much what happened. Do please note, I am not saying I know where the price is going, and the October result was pure coincidence, I don't have a crystal ball. But let's try the same exercise for November just for fun. November historically has been on average an even better month than October, with an average performance going back to 2011 of 44%. If this November meets its average, and it's a big if, that would put the Bitcoin price at just over $49 ,000. It's a pleasant thing to keep in mind. In macro indicators, today I have more news from the University of Michigan Consumer Survey. You may remember a couple of weeks ago, I talked about why this survey was worth watching. It's because of what it says about how consumers are feeling, which could impact future spending. Well, on Friday, we got the details for October, and there are some worrying signals in there. Inflation expectations one year out are now at 4 .4%, much higher than the expected 4%, and higher than September's 4 .2%. This is the highest level since May, which signals that the rate hikes are not doing what they're supposed to do, which is bring down corporate and consumer spending and reset expectations. The fact that consumer inflation expectations are more than double the official target is not nearly as worrying as the fact that they are heading up. And it's especially relevant since it is something Fed Chair Jerome Powell has said he keeps an eye on, as inflation expectations can influence behavior. This rise in the University of Michigan's survey result further confirms that rate cuts are not on the table just yet, and probably won't be for a while, at least until this number comes down to close to 2%. The University of Michigan inflation expectations for five years out also came in higher than expected at 3 .2%. This is lower than the 12 -month expectations, which is good, but it does send the signal that the Fed's inflation target won't be reached even in five years.
Markets Daily Crypto Roundup
A highlight from Crypto Update | What JPMorgan Analysts Missed About Bitcoin's Rally
"This episode of Markets Daily is sponsored by CME Group and PayPal. So you don't miss an episode, be sure to follow the podcast on your platform of choice and turn on notifications. And just a reminder, CoinDesk is a news source and does not provide investment advice. Now a markets roundup. After the hectic activity at the end of last week as markets reacted to BlackRock's filing of an EtherSpot ETF proposal, the weekend seemed like an oasis of calm. So far today, the market looks mixed. According to Coindesk Indices, at 9 a .m. Eastern Time this morning, Bitcoin was down two thirds of a percent over the past 24 hours, trading at $36 ,873. Ether was up one third, trading at $2 ,059. Elsewhere, Filecoin was up 14%, Cosmos was up 10%, Optimism and the Lido DAO token were up 5%. Solana was down 1 % after what has been an astonishing run. Over the past week, the asset is up over 40%. You may remember that in an early October episode, I pulled out the average performance of Bitcoin for the month of October going back to 2010, which was 27%. I calculated that if Bitcoin achieved that average performance during the month, the price would reach just over $34 ,000. Well, that's pretty much what happened. Do please note, I am not saying I know where the price is going, and the October result was pure coincidence, I don't have a crystal ball. But let's try the same exercise for November just for fun. November historically has been on average an even better month than October, with an average performance going back to 2011 of 44%. If this November meets its average, and it's a big if, that would put the Bitcoin price at just over $49 ,000. It's a pleasant thing to keep in mind. In macro indicators, today I have more news from the University of Michigan Consumer Survey. You may remember a couple of weeks ago, I talked about why this survey was worth watching. It's because of what it says about how consumers are feeling, which could impact future spending. Well, on Friday, we got the details for October, and there are some worrying signals in there. Inflation expectations one year out are now at 4 .4%, much higher than the expected 4%, and higher than September's 4 .2%. This is the highest level since May, which signals that the rate hikes are not doing what they're supposed to do, which is bring down corporate and consumer spending and reset expectations. The fact that consumer inflation expectations are more than double the official target is not nearly as worrying as the fact that they are heading up. And it's especially relevant since it is something Fed Chair Jerome Powell has said he keeps an eye on, as inflation expectations can influence behavior. This rise in the University of Michigan's survey result further confirms that rate cuts are not on the table just yet, and probably won't be for a while, at least until this number comes down to close to 2%. The University of Michigan inflation expectations for five years out also came in higher than expected at 3 .2%. This is lower than the 12 -month expectations, which is good, but it does send the signal that the Fed's inflation target won't be reached even in five years.
Cloud Security Podcast by Google
A highlight from EP148 Decoding SaaS Security: Demystifying Breaches, Vulnerabilities, and Vendor Responsibilities
"Welcome to the Cloud Security Podcast by Google. Thanks for joining us today. Your hosts here are myself, Timothy Peacock, the Senior Product Manager for Threat Detection here at Google Cloud, and Anton Chuvakin, a reformed analyst and senior staff in Google Cloud's Office of the CISO. You can find and subscribe to this podcast wherever you get your podcast, as well as at our website, cloud .google .com slash podcasts. If you enjoy our content and want it delivered to you piping hot every Monday, please do hit that subscribe button. You can follow the show, argue with us on the rest of the Cloud Security Podcast listeners on our LinkedIn page. Today is a special episode because it was originally live streamed. If you'd like to follow our live streams in the future, do follow the page. You can get the video content on our YouTube channel as well. Anton, we are talking about. Caspi 2023? in No, we are really not. We're not, we're not. What are we talking about? We are not. We are talking about securing SaaS. That sounds like Caspi. And I was deluded by claiming that securing SaaS is really just Caspi. And suddenly I think you are trying to troll me a little bit and flip the positions and pretend that you believe that securing SaaS is all about Caspi. You would never do that. Me? Troll you? Never. I would never do that. No, no, no. Okay. No, no, no. But it is a securing SaaS episode. And it is. And I think that there's a whole universe of things. And the strange part, there would be like a one particular surreal bit today. Most people who use software service assume that securing SaaS is about configuring security. Yes. And at the same time, most people correctly point out that the chance of a SaaS vendor being breached in some particularly nasty manner is really not high for the top tier vendors and that it can be handled through paper security contracts, questionnaires. And is that the truth? Is this not a year where we've seen counter examples of that though? I think that's the year where we've seen counter examples to put it mildly. Yes. Yes. Yes. Okay. Well, maybe with that teaser listeners, let's turn things over to today's guest. All right, listeners. Welcome to another live stream of the Cloud Security Podcast by Google. Thank you for joining us today. Our guest today, Adrian Sanabria, Director of Valence Threat Labs. Adrian, thank you so much for joining us today. Delighted to have you here. You are, of course, somebody who has also cool Legos in their background. So already you're doing great on the show. I want to start us off by centering us on SaaS. Spent a lot of time on the Cloud Security Podcast talking about cloud security for Azure and AWS and some other smaller cloud. I think that's called GCP, but there's this whole other world of cloud services that is SaaS and where users access an app like Salesforce or Workspace or O365, depending on what kind of credential they've stolen that day. So how do we think about securing SaaS as opposed to securing, say, the three infrastructure clouds? Well, it's a blurry line, right? Like how do you access those infrastructure clouds? That's also SaaS. It is, yeah. If you're using console .aws .com or whatever the GCP equivalent is or Azure equivalent. So, yeah, it's really interesting because it is kind of a blurry line. And we do find ourselves somewhat overlapping with infrastructure protection and stuff like that. Okta was a big supported platform. Also, the SaaS interfaces of security tools like CrowdStrike. We support SentinelOne and CrowdStrike as SaaS consoles that we secure because that's how everything works today is through a web browser, through an interface in a web browser, through some kind of SaaS interface. But wasn't it not like that in the past? Because you're a former analyst as well, right? And I do recall my former analyst years when there was this whole secure SaaS, you know, buy CASB, do the classic SaaS stuff. And there was on the left people who lived and shifted VMs and treated IaaS as kind of a colo, sadly. You know, we may rant about it, but it happened. But it sounds like the two worlds were further apart in the past. Yeah. Am I hallucinating it? No. Or is there something to that? No. And I think where it changed is behind the scenes quite a bit. A lot of it's we went from these monolithic web apps to API first dumb interfaces, which maybe have a little bit of JavaScript now, but there's a lot less heavy lifting by the JavaScript and a lot more done behind the scenes through the API. It used to be you'd run a search somewhere and it would pull the entire dataset, like the actual query in your browser tab and just use a ton of memory to do that. Now that that happens behind the scenes so that it's a much lighter lift, much quicker on the front end. Also, all these applications integrate now. Like before the pandemic, Zoom was just a dumb meetings app. Now it's this whole platform overnight, almost it seemed it had hundreds and hundreds of integrations. And a lot of these integrations work like if you had some kind of an inline tool like a SASE or a CASB or something like that, that's depending on looking at inline traffic, you're not going to see this because it's SaaS vendor to SaaS vendor where these actions are taking place, whether they be scheduled. But is it a customer problem? If it's a SaaS vendor to SaaS vendor, sometimes customers don't even see that stuff going on. So that sounds tricky. It is. I mean, shared responsibility, just like the public clouds. Right. And sometimes it's not clear where that line is, where that shared responsibility begins and ends. You know, like, for example, turning on logs, like I remember running an investigation years and years ago, they were using Office 365 and it was a case where somebody had gotten access to their email and we got in, we started investigating and it was clear they were on the inside because they were able to send convincing looking emails as other employees trying to change the bank accounts for large seven digit commercial real estate payments. And none of the logs were on by default. Like, we had no way of knowing when they got into the system, how long they had been in there, the extent of what they had access to. So during the investigation, we were the first one to turn on email logging. But that's sort of like so, okay, should I say so 90s? Well, none of this stuff existed in the 90s. So it's almost like it's just so sad 90s mistakes. Our job is just Groundhog Day, Anton. It's just Groundhog Day every day. But it's a Groundhog as a service. Yeah. Okay, fine. It's just supposed to be more funny than it helped. The Groundhog has moved. We still see 90s problems so often. Like, how often do we see some new fancy DevSecOps tool where there's a port exposed or default credentials or something like that? Like, we see these same issues popping up again and again because a lot of the people engineering this stuff are a new generation that didn't live through those times. And maybe we elder security folk didn't do a good job of passing down our lessons learned. Oh, that's for sure we didn't. I think you're supposed to invite Adrian because he's such a positive person and he would like shine the beautiful blue light. And now I'm more depressed than normal. So probably we should switch topics. How about incidents in the cloud? Oh, wait. Yeah, that's different, too. So what do we know from the actual breakage? I saw somebody post on LinkedIn the other day. Do we need CVEs for like cloud and SaaS? And didn't make a whole lot of sense to me because to me, a CVE is something you have to fix in your environment, like it's fixed once by the vendor, fixed many by the customer, whereas SaaS and cloud infrastructure is the opposite. The stuff we constantly see, like now it's these research teams working for vendors, for CSPM, SSPM vendors, they're out trying to find vulnerabilities and issues in these services. But once the vendor fixes it, it's fixed for all customers all at once. Right. So it doesn't make sense to assign that a CVE, right? I think that might be a limited view on what a CVE is for. No, no, I'm with Adrian. No, no, no. Hear me out. Hear me out. Wait. Okay, go. Okay. So sure, a CVE is definitely a statement that, hey, I have to go install some patches, but it's also a signal that something was vulnerable and I was at risk for a period of time from disclosure to patch. A CVE in the cloud or a CVE in a SaaS could reasonably serve the purpose of I need to investigate whether that was used against me while it was vulnerable and unpatched. And without a mechanism like CVE, how do I as a user know that my cloud provider or my SaaS provider might have lost my shit? I'm not arguing there shouldn't be a mechanism. There does need to be a mechanism, but I think it's confusing to lump it in with CVEs. I think it needs to be a separate database, a separate acronym. Yeah. And the most evident client facing, the client face inside is probably a misconfiguration. So it also wanted the CVE type. It is the defunct CCE or whatever they tried back in the day. In theory should have helped, but ultimately misconfigured SaaS would get you. And that's something you need to fix. Yeah. And just like with traditional vulnerabilities, we do need to understand the type. Like a lot of these issues we see in the cloud, you know, it's unclear if the researchers were the first ones to find it. And some of them are cross -tenant vulnerabilities. Like I remember one where if you knew the disk ID of a disk image in Microsoft in Azure, you could mount it. There were no access controllers. That's the early days. That's very early days. That's like 2013, maybe 14, right? No, it was like two years ago. Yeah. What year is this? It's 2023. Last time I checked. Thank you. Holy cow. We talked about it on Enterprise Security Weekly, and I've only been running that podcast for two years. So it was in the last two years. That's wild. Wild. Yeah, it was wild. Wow. Yeah. And you can imagine people taking screenshots that would show that ID or uploading things to GitHub where they would still have the, like, I wouldn't think to treat that image ID as a secret, right? Of course not. Why would you? You would think there's access control on it. Yeah. So again, shared responsibility, a very blurry line here with SaaS and cloud. And so we rely on a lot of researchers to say, hey, did they, did they build it? Like, surely not, you know, but you got to go and test it. This is why I think CVEs and cloud are important. How else would you as a, and again, it could be some other mechanism. Sure. Right. But I think structured vulnerability disclosure is important because if I'm a buyer and I want to decide, oh, man, is that system trustworthy? Does that system have these kinds of things? How else am I going to figure that out? Other than a database of the history of stuff we've discovered about it, maybe listening to podcasts. Yeah. And there are some now. There is a cloud vulnerability database. I forget what it's called. Yeah, it's launched by one of the cloud security, what we call a third party vendor, I think. Yes. There are actually two or three attempts at the cloud vulnerability database as a service protocol. We'll add them to resources. Yeah, that's great. OK, so I want to shift gears a little bit away from the again. We got back to Azure for a little bit. Tell me about the recent O365 SaaS breach. What's that? Is that a breach? Is that a cloud breach? Is that something else? Where does that land? Well, first of all, they rebranded. You got to keep up with the rebranding. If I try to keep up with Microsoft rebranding, I will. There's no more Office. What is it? Microsoft 365, M365. M365? And everything's defender, except for the things that are not defender. OK, fine, whatever. The email service in the cloud that's not workspace, that got breached. Was that a cloud breach? So there were several in the last couple of months. Are we talking about the AI data leak one or are we talking about the one where a bunch of government agencies broke into their emails? That one? Yeah, the storm. The 26 agencies that got popped because of bad token health and bad access key signing security. Yeah. So that was an interesting one because we don't know how it happened. We know that a Microsoft engineer lost access to this key at some point, but they're either not sure or they're not telling how that engineer got compromised. If you look at the wording, they don't even necessarily connect the engineer getting compromised to the rest of the attack. So it could be a red herring. I'm not sure. Maybe I'm reading into it too much, but there's going to be a government investigation into that. So there's a subsidiary of CISA that just does these investigations. And I predict in about 12 months, we'll have a much more detailed report telling us what happened there. But certainly access tokens played a role. Wait, is this one of the first real big NTSB cyber investigations we're going to see? No, I think the first one. What was the first one? Log4j. Yeah, Log4j was the first one. Yeah. So but wait a second. I'm getting this surreal vibe from all of that. So back when I was an analyst, I'm not going to joke about back when I was younger because it wasn't that far into the past. When dinosaurs roamed the earth and Anton was an analyst. Yeah. When the gas cloud, I kind of think gas cloud first, not before dinosaurs. Many people sort of assume that the infrastructure and a bunch of other stuff is taken care of by a SAS security vendor. And then the other Gartner wisdom, about 99 percent of cloud breaches being customer fault applies. So it's almost like my mind wants to naturally go back to the world where SAS providers, at least the top tier ones, are pretty secure, pretty well done. But customers kind of screw up configurations and then they cause issues. But we are seemingly in the world where SAS providers screw up and not the client. So like bring me back to the familiar, because now I'm getting even more nervous and I want to like unplug my computer from an Internet or something. The SAS vendors, you know, it doesn't grow your SAS revenue to build in the security or more security than your competitor. You want to reduce friction. You want to increase adoption. You want to increase spend. And none of that is done by making people jump through extra hoops when they authenticate, making them do step up authentication, making them spend a bunch of time checking their configuration, making sure the configuration is correct. So there is some pressure for the SAS vendor to pick a configuration, get it right. And typically they don't. That's not the top priority. So the customer bears the brunt of that. So a great example of that is how we handle external data sharing today. So by default, overwhelmingly, at least from my research, the number one use case for data sharing is I'm about to jump into a meeting. I've got a file I need to share with somebody. We're going to discuss this file during the meeting. We shared a file to prep for this podcast, right? Like the very common use case. But what's the expiration on that? Why isn't there an expiration on that data sharing? In many cases, that data share no longer needs to exist the moment that meeting ends, right? Sometimes it's a little bit longer. Maybe you're working with a contractor, maybe it's three months out, but there's no lifecycle. There's no full governance on that data share. And the same thing with integrations, the same thing with a lot of identities in SAS, very optimized for getting you in the application, creating the integration, creating the data share, but little to no focus on cleaning it up afterwards. So you end up with this big mess. And we find on average, here's a stat we got from our customers. Ninety one percent of data shares have not been touched in 90 days and can just be closed. This certainly rhymes with kind of the material security thesis of let's lock down all your old email and make you put in a different password to get access to it. So I totally buy that this is how information works in our presence. But what we're finding is like CISOs will say, well, nobody's touched it in 90 days. What's the worst case? They have to reshare a file like just remove all that, just clean it all up, just sweep it all away. Attack surface gone. Well, I think Googlers who are coping with our changes in access control might take issue with what's the worst that happens. They have to wait for a reshare. But I can see how a lot of reasonable people would come to that conclusion. Yes. And it also sort of reminds us, by the way, it also this whole ghost of IAM barges into our conversation and roars. Sorry, I'm mixing ghosts and dinosaurs, but the point is that ultimately these are permission problems and I'd watch that movie. Yeah, it's not about bad SaaS vendor or bad customer. It's about over permissioning and not having the right IAM culture or access management culture, whatnot. So it's back to almost every cloud problem has an IAM problem behind it somewhere. Right. And a lot of it is just simply UX. Yeah. Huh. When I go to share a file, where's the option to share it for a day? Why isn't share it for 24 hours the default option? Why don't I have an option to share it for seven days, share it for a month? That's a profound thought. Expire after my calendar with this share, tie this share to a calendar event and expire an hour after it. Did we just give somebody a cool startup idea to build that and get rich? That's a feature, not a company. Right. That's what analysts say. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Fair point. So privacy engineering is already focused on this when just managing the performance of your mobile devices, your iPad will unload and shove over to iCloud your mobile app data to save space if you run out of space, rather than just saying you can't install this new app because you're out of space. Or if you haven't used an app for four weeks, five weeks or something like that, your Android might say, hey, it doesn't look like you're using these apps. Would you like to clean them up? So this idea of cleaning up unused stuff isn't even so much for security implications or privacy implications. It's just for performance on mobile devices. And I think that maps over pretty well to enterprise SaaS and cloud as well. Like Google. Google will do that. The first time I used GCP to run a workload, it told me you over provision this. You're not using nearly as many resources. You saw I am recommend you could save some money by choosing a smaller instance. I was like, that's the only cloud that's ever told me, hey, you're spending too much. We're not paying him to say this, right? Tim, just to confirm this is very organic. Very organic. But he's also not paying us to mention the balance, right? Like it's all kind of very fair. Yeah. Balance is up. Or he didn't pay us to mention his podcast either. Oh, that's right. Yes, exactly. It's all kosher here. I want to shift back onto the SaaS world and maybe ask if I'm a director and I'm bringing out a new SaaS vendor, what are the things I'm least likely to understand about securing it when I first start using it? And what should I do different? I think number one is understanding how the business is planning to use it. But I think there's an assumption in what you just said there that might not even be true. Maybe it's already been in use for three months when the IT team finds out that it exists or three years or something like that, right? Like sometimes SaaS is owned completely outside of IT and security IT are unaware of it. Who are the Salesforce admins? In many cases, they don't even work for the company. You hire like a third party group of Salesforce experts to set up your Salesforce and run it for you. First of all, you need to understand how the business is going to use it to understand how it needs to be secured. Because Salesforce, just rolling with that example, I think there's well over 200 different configuration options. And then you could extrapolate that to more if you take in all the options within options. So the least understood aspect here is that ultimately, when you say, hey, let's secure SaaS because you're onboarded it, you may then realize it was onboarded three years ago. It shouldn't be not understood in 2023, because again, I vaguely recall this whole people whipping up a credit card and buying SaaS going back maybe 10 years ago, maybe more. So it's a little strange how we are misunderstanding it for 10 years. It's more that it's been deferred, I think, by most security teams than that it's not well understood. Well, and it's not well understood because it's been deferred for so long. You'll have teams say, well, let's figure out patching first before we moved on. I was talking to an old friend of mine and he was telling me the other day he had to teach the Linux admins how to turn on patching in Red Hat. There was no repo enabled for updating software. What century is that? Yeah, I know. I shouldn't even say what year is this? Like, what century is that? Yeah, Red Hat Enterprise and no enabled repos, no way to apt update or apt upgrade anything. So that's where we're living where SaaS seems like, okay, like that's something I'll tackle in the future. But the problem is, most of our business stuff has moved there already. Workloads moved in two directions. The custom in -house stuff moved to cloud and then everything else moved to SaaS. And you have to have a really good justification to not use SaaS. Like, let's stand up this internal HR platform or are we going to use Workday or Bamboo HR, something like that. You're going to go the SaaS route. So if you're structured to top three misunderstood aspects of SaaS security, I guess maybe I'm going to reserve the number three for CASB just does it. So what are the other two? One of them is that they're all unique. There's no standards for SaaS configuration. Like in one SaaS, maybe all the security options you want are there. In another one, half of them are there. And in another one, you have to pay extra for the security features. Yes, exactly. You just had to make it even more depressing, Tim. Sorry. Yeah, my bad. So one of them is just the uniqueness of each one. Each one is a snowflake, pardon the pun, and you have to learn each one from scratch. On some platforms, for example, MFA is the one step process. You just enable MFA for an identity. And in another, you have to both enable and enforce it. And if you forget that second step, then you haven't actually done MFA correctly. What? Yeah, it's also Microsoft. Sure. I can see that. Maybe MFA is something you enable and then users have to configure it if they want it, or you can enforce it. I get it. I understand some poor PM who couldn't migrate all his users or her users or their users. That sounds awful. And it leaves us with this kind of situation. And there's different layers of enforcement. When I log into a lot of services, I get an option that says, don't make me MFA again for 30 days, or maybe ever. Once I do it once on this device, just give me an OAuth key that lasts indefinitely. And that's where we see cybercrime taking advantage of that. And there's a special kind of malware called info stealers that do nothing but sweep up all your SAS OAuth keys and sell them on a black market or use them to get into a company and deploy ransomware. So wait a second. I feel like we haven't talked about CASB enough. And the reason why we did an episode on podcast on SAS security and which we'll link in the resources. But the thing is that I was very skeptical. And again, maybe it's my old garden of brain or something. I was like, yeah, why are we talking about this new platform for securing SAS? CASB does it. And then, of course, now we have SSPM. So we have the CASB bucket. We have SSPM bucket. SAS security posture management. People, our audience have been beating on us a little bit for not explaining all the acronyms. CASB, I'm not going to explain. Acronym is kind of too embarrassing. Cloud access security broker. Tim Wood. Fine. That counts. But I'm not sure that explains it. It's meant to be software that helps you use cloud stuff securely. But it's the only security acronym with a B. So that's already kind of a little disturbing. Yes. Broker is a weird word to have in an acronym. Yeah. I mean, I think broker ended up in there because a broker helps you use other stuff. Right? It kind of makes sense. Anyway, go on, Anton. Sorry. So the question is, Adrian kind of quietly implying that maybe there's another category of SAS security tech that we need to have. So how does it all fit with securing SAS? Do you have CASB, SSPM, or other? Early on, long before I joined Valence, I referred to the new SAS security companies as CASB v2. And I largely saw CASB as a failure in what it tried to do. It pivoted a lot during its very quick and hot burn that it went through before they all exited. Isn't this too harsh? This is harsh. CASB as a failure is too harsh. I'm sorry. I'm not offended, but I'm like surprised. So I don't think we've yet seen us live alongside of CASB, but we do replace them. And we see this all the time in security. We see a category that's largely defined by one or two vendors, and then all the other vendors follow that model. And it's the wrong model. It's not a model that has market fit, that lands with customers. And then we see the next generation come in and try a different approach. You know, NT malware didn't take the wrong approach initially, but the adversaries switched. And if you didn't pivot quickly enough to the next gen approaches, when we got CrowdStrike and Silence and all that, you were kind of dead in the water. And we saw a lot of companies directly impacted by not moving quickly enough. And so CASB, I think they did start to pivot towards more API models than forward and reverse proxy. They were very excited. And I was very excited about the idea that I can adopt SAS, but not this feature. And I can add this feature, but the idea that they're taking away JavaScript and injecting JavaScript on the fly, I can do step up authentication where it doesn't exist. The SAS vendor doesn't give me that. Like I want to change somebody's payroll or change where it direct deposits. Maybe I want my CASB to require step up authentication for that. And you could do that with a CASB. Or I want to use Yammer, but I want them to use Slack for chat or Teams for chat. I don't want them to use the built in chat within Yammer. So you take away the chat box using an inline CASB. And just turns out, even if they said they wanted that, nobody took the time to set it up. So most of the customers I talked to, the use cases they would get around to that they would have time for were much more basic, much more simple. And I think the other thing that kind of killed it is the CASBs were very focused on shadow IT and discovering as much as possible, which became very overwhelming. We just talked about how each of these SAS needed though, right? Well, but it created a problem. We just talked about how every SAS is a unique snowflake and you have to study and understand each one to be able to configure it correctly. So now I just told you, you have a thousand. I discovered your entire long tail of SAS use within your organization. Where do you start? Whereas now you look at this current gen of SAS security companies like ours, it's very much more focused on Microsoft 365, your Google workspace. There's a lot of work to do there already. And it's much more of a hygiene governance focus than discover all your shadow IT and lock it down. So much more business enablement, much more like, hey, we're going to let the business continue using the SAS, but we're going to give you the visibility you need to go in there and without disturbing them, without killing productivity, going in there and fixing things up as you go, rather than come in as blockers. Well, Adrian, this has been a fascinating and wide ranging conversation. We are unfortunately at the time where I have to ask our closing questions. One, do you have a tip to help people improve their SAS security? And two, do you have some recommended reading for our listeners? Yeah, so the tip, I would say integrate identities as much as you can. Don't let people use the native stuff. Then you don't have to worry about a lot of the built in SAS settings like MFA and stuff like that. If you push everybody to Okta or push everybody to Google or Microsoft, you can rely on the configuration you've already done there and get the benefit of scale from that. So take advantage of single sign on and integrations like that, that take some of that work off your hands. What was the second question? Recommended reading. Well, so recommended reading, we do have a report that goes through a lot of the stuff that we're talking about. It's got examples of breaches. So if you look for the 2023 Valence State of SAS Security report, it has examples of breaches to go along with. A lot of the stuff that we've talked about goes through the different use cases that we see in SAS security. We kind of break it down into the different components, misconfigurations. We talked about identities. We talked about external data sharing and also integrations, those SAS to SAS integrations that you wouldn't see in line and then has all the data that we pulled. I got to play with the data that we actually got from our customers. And I mentioned that 91 % stat. There's a whole bunch of interesting stats in there that are in that report. And then we give recommendations and predictions. And one of my predictions was that AILM will lead to an explosion of new SAS. So there'll be more than ever to deal with. Got it. Adrian, thank you so much for joining us today. Listeners, thank you for joining us on the live stream. I see lots of fun comments. I want to thank everybody for the engagement. And Adrian, your fellow podcaster in the security space, Rafal Los, is calling you out on some of your comments about exits and the CASB space. Well, he has a podcast too. So you know what to do, Raf. Raf knows what to do. We'll all get together and argue about CASB. It'll be great. God, I was going to say that'll be a great time. I don't know about that. All right. Thanks, folks. Depends on your perspective. Yeah, sure does. With that, thank you all for joining us today. Well, thank you very much. I appreciate it. And now we are at time. Thank you very much for listening and, of course, for subscribing. You can find this podcast at Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever else you get your podcasts. Also, you can find us at our website, cloud .withgoogle .com slash cloud security slash podcast. Please subscribe so that you don't miss episodes. You can follow us on Twitter, twitter .com slash cloudsecpodcast. Your hosts are also on Twitter at Anton underscore Chiwaki and underscore Tim Pico. Tweet at us, email us, argue with us. And if you like or hate what we hear, we can invite you to the next episode. See you on the next Cloud Security Podcast episode. Bye.
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 18:00 11-12-2023 18:00
"Financial advisors, are you looking to add or switch custodians? Are you going independent? Interactive Brokers provides lowest cost trading and turnkey custody solutions for all size firms. Trade globally from a single integrated master account with no ticket charges, no custody fees, no minimums, and no tech platform or reporting fees. Plus, IBKR has no advisory team or prop trading group to compete with you for your clients. Switch to the custody solutions that work for you at IBKR .com slash RIA. Broadcasting 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com and the Bloomberg Business Act. This is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Asia for this Monday, November 13th in Hong Kong. Sunday, November 12th in New York. And coming up today, the U .S. says restoring military ties with China is a priority at this week's meeting between President Biden and Xi. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen plans to visit China again next year. Chinese tech giants Alibaba and JD .com report sales increases for single stay. Hostage talks between the leaders of the U .S. and Qatar. Netanyahu says his ground offensive is saving lives in Gaza. U .S. attacks are on targets in Syria, some compromise on U .S. funding. I'm Ed Baxter with Global News. Manchester City moves atop the Premier League table with a draw versus Chelsea. I'm Dan Schwartzman. I'll have that story and more coming up in Bloomberg Sports. Hi, everybody.
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 15:00 11-12-2023 15:00
"Interactive Brokers charges USD margin loan rates from 5 .83 % to 6 .83 % rated the lowest margin fees by stockbrokers .com. Their clients can also earn extra income by lending their fully paid shares of stock. Join Interactive Brokers clients from 200 plus countries and territories to invest in stocks, options, futures, funds, and bonds on 150 global markets. Great subject to change. Learn more at ibkr .com slash compare. 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com and the Bloomberg Business Act. This is Bloomberg Radio. This is a Bloomberg Money Minute. WeWork's bankruptcy filing is rattling the market for office space. These property owners, it's the last thing they needed. Ruth Kolpaver is CEO of Wharton Property Advisors. She says WeWork's filing allows it to walk away from some leases and renegotiate others downward. These properties are going to be reprised and some of them won't make it. The economics just won't make sense. The leases, where a new tenant is willing to lease the space, won't cover the building's operating expenses and real estate taxes. Kolpaver also says this could mean the end of the road, especially for some older, more low -tech buildings. WeWork often rented for the co -working spaces it then leased out to others. They'll go back to the bank and who knows what will happen to them. I mean, some of these buildings could really, could be demolished and they'll start from scratch. Meantime, real estate analytics firm Green Street says even before the WeWork bankruptcy filing, office prices had tumbled 21 % in the past year. Denise Pellegrini, Bloomberg Radio. Melissa from Michigan. I work an extra part -time job serving lunch at my child's school, but I still can't afford to put food on our table.
Bloomberg Radio New York - Recording Feed
Monitor Show 13:00 11-12-2023 13:00
"Interactive Brokers pays up to 4 .83 % on instantly available USD cash balances in your brokerage account. How much interest can your broker pay? Interactive Brokers' conservative and prudent risk management uniquely positions them to pay up to 4 .83 % on uninvested, instantly available USD cash balances in your brokerage account. The best informed investors choose Interactive Brokers. Rates subject to change. Visit ibkr .com slash interest rates to learn more. 24 hours a day at Bloomberg .com and the Bloomberg Business Act. This is Bloomberg Radio. This is a Bloomberg Money Minute. Federal Reserve data finds consumers are racking up more credit card debt. Credit card balances rose yet again in the third quarter, up $48 billion, and they are now at $1 .08 trillion. Janelle Marté wrote the story for Bloomberg News. The report also found that there was a rise in the share of people who are becoming newly delinquent on their credit card payments. The data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is raising concerns about whether a consumer spending boom can continue to power blockbuster economic growth. So it's a sign that people are falling further behind, starting to struggle a little bit more with their credit card payments and with other debt payments. Credit card balances are now $154 billion higher than they were a year ago. The jump in credit card balances marks the eighth straight quarter of year over year increases. I'm Charlie Pellet, Bloomberg Radio. The impact of a meal goes well beyond feeding our bodies, because feeling full can sound like this. How did the interview go? I did it! I got the job! I can't believe it! And like this. Mom! I got first place at the science fair with my volcano project! That's amazing, sweetie.
Crypto Banter
"24 hours" Discussed on Crypto Banter
"Huge show today. We're going to talk about this Bitcoin price movement because what happened was Bitcoin went from 24,500 went all the way down yesterday to 23,610 and then it bounced. All the way back to 24,300. But then it went back to 23,500 and I'm going to show you all the reasons as to why this happened. And then I'm going to show you whether or not it matters or why these moves these moves matter and these moves do matter. Also, we're going to be discussing coinbase launching a layer two on a layer two. So launching their own chain on a layer to launching an optimism. And if you look at the optimism press, spiked to $3 in one cent. That's the candle. I'm also going to talk to you about the move in GMX and GMS that caused these big green candles. We have a huge show today. Let me tell you, I think one of the biggest shows that we've done in a long time. So if you're not already out of it, get out of bed. Get the fuck out of bed, bitch, go. Get out your heart. I wake up. How to wake up, bitch get up. Get up. Get up. Get up. Get up. Wake your wake, your
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"Fashion. The dateable podcast is part of the frolic podcast network, find more podcasts you'll love at frolic media slash podcasts. Want to continue the conversation? First, follow us on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter with the handle at dateable podcast. Tagas in any post with a hashtag stay dateable and trust us. We look at all those posts. Then head over to our website dateable podcast dot com. There you'll find all the episodes as well as articles, videos and our coaching service with vetted industry experts. You can also find our premium Y series where we dissect analyze and offer solutions to some of the most common dating conundrums. We're also downloadable for free on Spotify, Apple podcasts, Google Play, overcast, stitch radio, and other podcast platforms. Your feedback is valuable to us, so don't forget to leave us a review. And most importantly, remember to..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"But I do think <Speech_Female> you do see things <Speech_Female> about <Speech_Female> the way others engage <Speech_Female> with the world. That's <Speech_Female> really important to know when you're <Speech_Female> looking for <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Female> long-term via abilities <Speech_Female> at them. Well, you <Speech_Female> guys just went through like <Speech_Female> a month long relationship <Speech_Female> at one weekend. <Speech_Female> I <Speech_Female> know, was that <Speech_Female> couples counseling? <Laughter> I know, I'm like <Laughter> so tired. <Speech_Female> <Speech_Female> Love it. Well, <Speech_Female> thank you both for <Speech_Female> participating <Speech_Female> in this. This <Speech_Female> has been such <Speech_Female> a great experiment. <Speech_Female> And we're so <Speech_Female> glad that you too. <Speech_Female> Have a good time and <Speech_Female> learn so much about how <Speech_Female> you can show up for dating <Speech_Female> in the future. Yeah, <Speech_Female> and taught us how to <Speech_Female> get free food and <Speech_Female> drinks. Yeah. <Speech_Female> Now we know. <Speech_Female> It's going to a bar <Speech_Female> and say, we're doing this <Speech_Female> dating experiment. We <Speech_Female> got no money to spend, <Speech_Female> give us some free drinks. <Speech_Female> Let's do it. <Speech_Female> <SpeakerChange> Exactly. <Speech_Female> In all seriousness, <Speech_Female> despite <Speech_Female> the incompatibility, <Speech_Female> <Speech_Female> you both still <Speech_Female> learned relational skills. <Speech_Female> And that's what ultimately <Speech_Female> what relationships <Speech_Female> are about as you're <Speech_Female> relating to someone else, <Speech_Female> right? So I <Speech_Female> don't think anybody should ever <Speech_Female> say <Speech_Female> I spent so much <Speech_Female> time dating people <Speech_Female> that weren't right for me <Speech_Female> because <Speech_Female> those people <Speech_Female> who are not right for <Speech_Female> you are prepping <Speech_Female> you for the person <Speech_Female> who is right for <Speech_Female> you. So thank you <Speech_Female> for being on <SpeakerChange> board and <Speech_Male> being open minded to <Speech_Male> that. Oh, thanks so <Speech_Male> much for the adventure. <Speech_Female> This is definitely <Speech_Female> fascinating. <Speech_Female> Yeah, for sure. I <Speech_Female> learned so much in such a <Speech_Female> short amount of time. It <Speech_Female> was wild. I think <Speech_Female> I'm gonna definitely <SpeakerChange> do dating <Speech_Female> differently now. Love it. <Speech_Female> That's right. <Speech_Female> Fabulous. <Speech_Female> Then, well, thank <Speech_Female> you so much for being part of <Speech_Female> the experiment and <Speech_Female> thank you all <Speech_Female> for listening to this <Speech_Female> experiment. If you <Speech_Female> love this experiment, <Speech_Female> if you want to sign up for <Speech_Female> a new one that <Speech_Female> we have down the line, <Speech_Female> just you can <Speech_Female> DM us or email us. You just go <Speech_Female> on a website, they will podcast <Speech_Female> dot com or better <Speech_Female> <Advertisement> yet, give us a 5 <Speech_Female> star rating in Apple <Speech_Female> podcasts and then <Speech_Female> we'll put <Speech_Female> <Advertisement> you at the top of the list. <Speech_Female> That's how you <Speech_Music_Female> get <SpeakerChange> in, <Speech_Music_Female> <Advertisement> all right? <Speech_Music_Female> <Advertisement> Okay. We're <Speech_Music_Female> gonna wrap up <Speech_Music_Female> this episode <SpeakerChange> in <Speech_Music_Female> true dateable
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"When <Speech_Female> <Speech_Male> <SpeakerChange> <Speech_Telephony_Male> <Speech_Music_Male> <Speech_Music_Female> <Laughter> we listen back <Speech_Female> to the check ins, <Speech_Female> your first <Speech_Female> day check ins <Speech_Female> are so different <Speech_Female> from your second day <Speech_Female> check ins because there <Speech_Female> was just a lot more <Speech_Male> intimacy <SpeakerChange> and connection <Speech_Male> on that first day. <Speech_Male> Yes, <Speech_Male> I agree with that. I <Speech_Male> agree, there <Speech_Male> is something <Speech_Telephony_Male> about <Speech_Male> when it is <Speech_Male> too activity focused. <Speech_Male> You <Speech_Male> may lack <Speech_Male> the ability to get <Speech_Male> to know each other. I <Speech_Male> do also have to <Speech_Male> say, though, you know, <Speech_Male> because you know, I'm all <Speech_Male> about the yes and <Speech_Telephony_Male> like mentality <Speech_Male> and I feel as if <Speech_Male> and let me know <Speech_Male> if I didn't do <Speech_Male> this that if I <Speech_Male> presented <Speech_Male> a <Speech_Male> play experiment, <Speech_Male> if we didn't want to do <Speech_Male> it, then it would be like, oh, that's <Speech_Male> cool. We'll just do something else, <Speech_Male> you know. I <Speech_Male> wanted to create <Speech_Music_Male> that safe <Speech_Male> space that <Speech_Male> it didn't feel as if <Speech_Male> <Speech_Male> she was going through <Speech_Telephony_Male> like a marathon <Speech_Telephony_Male> or Alan <Speech_Male> of now the <Speech_Male> next thing. But <Speech_Male> I do feel there's <Speech_Male> also <Speech_Male> opportunities in <Speech_Male> the play <Speech_Male> where one learns <Speech_Male> about each other <Speech_Male> that you can't learn <Speech_Male> from just <Speech_Male> talking about something, <Speech_Male> you know, <Speech_Male> it's more in <Speech_Male> the actual experience <Speech_Male> as well. So I <Speech_Male> feel there's value <Speech_Male> in both. When <Speech_Male> two people are in a space <Speech_Male> connecting with many <Speech_Male> different people <Speech_Male> and watching how <Speech_Male> they work with <Speech_Telephony_Male> each other, they learn a lot <Speech_Telephony_Male> about each other and that <Speech_Male> process as well. <Speech_Male> Because you can also say <Speech_Male> like, hey, I'm <Speech_Male> this way, <Speech_Male> but when you're in the <Speech_Male> experience, <SpeakerChange> then people <Speech_Female> can actually see it as <Speech_Female> well. I definitely <Speech_Female> agree with all of that. <Speech_Female> And <Speech_Female> I didn't directly communicate <Speech_Female> when I felt <Speech_Female> at times <Speech_Female> some anxiety around <Speech_Female> things. And I do feel <Speech_Female> like if I had directly said, <Speech_Music_Female> I don't I just don't want to <Speech_Music_Female> do that. You would have been totally <Speech_Female> flexible and <Speech_Female> open. I think <Speech_Female> you always did <Speech_Female> communicate that <Speech_Female> you want to be to feel comfortable <Speech_Female> <SpeakerChange> and enjoy <Speech_Female> what was happening. <Speech_Female> So I do think <Speech_Female> you do embody <Speech_Female> the yes and sentiment <Speech_Music_Female> and I do think <Speech_Female> that you <Speech_Female> did exhibit that with me, <Speech_Female> but I do think <Speech_Female> we did lose connectivity <Speech_Female> because <Speech_Female> the other people <Speech_Music_Female> ended up being very distracted. <Speech_Female>
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"How do I stay curious? How do I stay present? So I think there's probably areas that both of you can kind of take away to kind of get that to be more well rounded. And it's ultimately a combination of both at the end of the day. If we just are looking for an activity partner, that's not really the core relationship, that's just an activity partner, but also if we're not doing anything interesting, then that's boring too. Yeah, I'll just say, yeah, I definitely wanna be more present person, I think I'm so goals oriented and when I think about what I'm looking for, I want a relationship, but why do I want a relationship? It's because I want marriage and kids, but obviously I need to experience life with somebody every day, right? Like, you know, life is literally millions of 24 hour sessions back to back. So do I enjoy hanging around this person, can I really be wholly myself and totally vulnerable and feel safe and comfortable around this person? So yeah, I definitely want to be more like Jeff in certain respects, but I still got my eye on the prize. I'm gonna husband. I'm gonna do things where like, you know, I wanna get to know you, right? Yeah. Yeah, oh no, I completely agree with that. I almost feel as if the first day was much more of us connecting on a level of understanding each other and who each other were and then I think the second day was much more experienced lead. So we probably spent less time connecting in that way. So yes, I agree. I think one of the biggest takeaways is going into a date with a default parameter. I think we go into day thinking, I'm going to give this person a like 5 minutes and if they don't live up to what I'm looking for, I'm out or the connection's not there, but what if you said the default is I'm giving this four hours minimally so that you kind of know that you are spending your time with someone for a set amount of time versus them trying to earn extra time with you. That's just never a good way to think about it. There is something to be said about the yes and mentality. And I actually think both Nora and Jeff can learn from this. We talked about Nora, you know, we touched upon that that you can be a little bit more present and open to this playfulness, that Jeff has been talking about. But for Jeff, it's this kind of the same thing. There is a yes and mentality in play, too. So if Nora wasn't so down for Hannah roses or fighting in front of the Uber driver, maybe there's an ant to that and not just a series of putting her through tests. And I know for Jeff's point of view, these were experiential activities, but from Nora's perspective, they felt like Tess and she wasn't passing these tests. So you're creating this me versus you mentality. But if you had a yes and a mentality, then it's okay, she's not down for that, but let's try something else. And let's just show a little bit more compassion with that. What is interesting is, yes, both of you had, I guess, a more chilled out date, the first day, and then more activities based. It sounds like there was more connection on the first day because you were able to speak and talk to each other and ask each other all the questions, but on day two, both of your interests tapered because of the activities that were overshadowing the date itself. It just felt like there was a lot of anxiety around activity. What to do next? Well, what crazy thing can we do next? What crazy thing can we throw into the mix? And that completely overpowers the integrity of the date, which is getting to know each other..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"You would like for them to show up versus someone who's open to working towards more playfulness or showing up in the way that you are expecting? Yeah. I think it's more of the openness, right? It's more like, you know, when I even when I describe it, it sounds as if it's like this is very rigid like there's only a certain way. That is what it sounds like. That is what it sounds like. And I'm sorry, it does sound that way, because when I even describe play, I describe it in like it's a very open ended like we're having like an adventure together. So there's a lot of opportunity to show up in many different ways and play and they don't have to play my way, but I just want them to be able to be more themselves and be willing to allow their silly weirdness to come out. And some people just don't find that. That's not their jam. So that's understandable. A lot of the people that I have dated are kind of weird and kind of silly and are open to things like I have these flowers here. One of the things we were potentially going to do is people watch and if we saw anyone that we thought was like really interesting or fascinating, we had these flowers. All right, I was thinking about giving them out to people. Well, I asked her, is that some Nora? Is that something that you open to and she's like, no. I know. Like, no, that's my thing. Okay, cool, you know? So then we didn't do that. I constantly was trying to, especially on day two, figure out ways in which how do we do something that's playful and fun, but also within her comfort zone. And if it wasn't, then we were just like, okay, we're not going to do that, you know? So 24 hours, you probably saw different sides of her throughout it..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"His campaign because he's running for office. And just the way we interacted with people was just different. And again, that's not wrong. It's just that we just weren't on the same page. It just didn't feel like we were connected. So, you know, I feel like, you know, we're looking at this, oh, what did she do wrong or what did I do wrong? I don't think we did anything wrong. I think we were just we interact with people in a different way. And then we even agreed and talked about it that way. They were just different people. So I don't know if that answers your question. No, I think that makes a lot of sense. Like, every day, is it going to end up being the person that you end up being with, right? That's just the matter of fact of this. I think the 24 hour if anything just probably sped up, understanding each other and seeing each other. I guess the part, though, that is interesting to me is there a world where differences could actually make you compatible and they're also are a lot of different other elements that make someone compatible outside of just play and how they interact in social settings. I guess was there anything that you really liked about her that you do want in a partner? Yeah, she is ridiculously smart, ridiculously dynamic. We had so many interesting conversations about politics about power classism, all this stuff. So that's, I mean, it was really interesting and riveting and fascinating. And she's just doing a lot of really dope work. You know, speaking to know about that, I could have talked to her for we did. We talked for hours about that. And I love that. I thought that was really amazing. It just also are the way in which we both want to impact the world. We both want to like our work is revolves around leaving not a legacy, but leaving an impact that actually helps other people. And to speak for people that may not be able to speak for themselves. So that's where we both connected. You did communicate the incompatibility. Can you walk us through how you communicated that? Oh, so then after the day, when we were just like texting back and forth, you know, it was like, hey, you know, this is what I really loved about, you know, our interaction, everything together. But I feel like because I'm much more of like a play guy and I kind of show up in this like play setting and a much more silly and very out there that might not be your vibe. So, you know, from my perspective, I didn't feel like we had that level of compatibility, but I still feel as if you're super dope. And so you did mention that her curiosity tapered off on day two. Did this happen after this talk? Oh, do we didn't have that talk until at the after all the way at the end of day two? Okay. So when did you notice the curiosity kind of tapering off? I think probably the second day, I think when we also became more comfortable with each other. We also have to remember that dynamic is we just spent 12 hours together and talk the entire time together. So in many ways, we felt like we had learned a ton about each other already. And then I think, I mean, my day, I felt was a little bit different from her, you know, her day. Mine started off by, you know, like I got her like a care package because she really liked popcorn and I found that out and I got like an umbrella and like a poncho and I was like, okay, let's start off today that way. You know, then we went to my friend's reams restaurant who the first time she was opening it up to anybody since the pandemic..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"Jeff, you've done a lot of fun experimental dates we're guessing that you've never done a 24 hour date before. So what about this date was different than your average date? So many different things. The fact that it was 24 hours, the fact that we spend 12 hours back to back, the fact that it felt like it was ten dates and also that it was a blind date where neither of us knew anyone. We were just like, this is the first time we were connecting. And that also we only could spend a $100, which then made it really. We had to be very creative in what we did in those 12 hours with only a $100. So it seemed like from the very start, you didn't feel like the romantic connection. At least from your check in. Was there ever a time that you felt this could be something or was it kind of consistently more of a platonic vibe? I mean, maybe early on, maybe in the first four to 6 hours when we're just trying to get to know each other. Because again, you get to learn so much about the person that a lot of times you don't even know if you're like, do I like this person or not because you're like, man, we have so much time together so we're gonna have plenty of time to figure this out, right? And then I think at one point when we were talking about play and I'm a play person. That's what I do. That's what I do for a living, all that. And she was like, I don't play a lot. I just don't play. That's just not my thing, that it was like, oh, okay, that's one of the first times where I was like, oh, well, this is where we are different. But also I was repeating myself, you know, even in the recordings like, you know, you know, I'm embracing my panda like spirit. Like let me be curious and let me be present and let's just keep going because maybe that will change or maybe that will evolve. But I don't think then it ever went there. So as soon as she told you that she wasn't into play, that's when the connection ended for you? No, I think it was just like, okay, well, you know, that doesn't mean that it's not possible. Let's just continue to experience this day. But just the way in which we each show up is drastically different, right? She's awesome, right? She's like dynamic and like at the top of her game. I think also because she's so results oriented. It's very different from me who are much more process oriented. So just even the way in which we show up in public is different. And I could see that in each and every one of our interactions when we would go to like a certain bar or we go to like a restaurant or something like that would just showed up differently, which then just felt like it was just not that type of connection. Having said that, we were both really curious about each other, so we I'm fascinated by her. So we talked the entire time. So I want to dig into this process oriented versus results oriented a little more. Sure. Can you kind of elaborate? What does that mean in terms of how you view it compatibility? So, you know, because I play, that's like what I do. I love to not really focus on an outcome. I'm really more in there for like attunement and connection. I talk a lot about this about how one of your first forms of ways in which you connect is via attunement. When a baby looks at a mother's eyes, like their brainwaves are identical. That's the way in which people begin to play, right? So everyone is always trying to attune with each other..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"I just don't think I would have seen that. Had we not done this together. But there was a shift on day two where you said you stopped talking to each other. Can you pinpoint exactly when that happened or what caused that to happen? Yeah, I mean, I think it was basically we went to this political fundraiser. There were obviously a lot of other people there. And then, you know, so we both had the same idea that we were going to have the beginning of the day, be really structured. And for me, I was like, because I didn't know him at all, right? And I didn't know what he'd like. So I figured I would just have a lot of options available. But the first part would be pretty structured. It'd be pretty like standard and benign, right? Like a walk across the bridge. You know, we're gonna go through the presidio because it's beautiful. We're gonna get some dim sum because I have a hundred bucks and gives this delicious. But then afterwards, I wanted to be flexible. I wanted to do like a wellness check. Make sure he was feeling okay and then see what he liked and then we could adjust from there. And I think his view was the same. You know, he had a set plan for part of the date and then he wanted to kind of be flexible and see how they took us. But once we were at that bar, you know, and I'm not putting it on him. I don't know what happened. But you know, throughout the journey, too, we met a lot of really wonderful people. And you know, once I shared what was going on, especially in particular, there was this bartender crystal, who like, she was just wonderful, and she was like, wait, you're all on a date and you're less than a hundred bucks. And she just gave a string. She gave a shot. And that was wonderful, and that kind of thing felt organic, and it was still a part of the experience we're having together. But at some point, we're like talking to all these other people. The fundraiser and then we're hanging out with them. And I was down for that, right? But when I was looking back at the date, I was like, this isn't to me getting to know you. I'm not getting what we were supposed to get out of this date, but also again like I am somebody who is more focused on the goals. I am somebody who's like, you know, I was given an assignment from you guys, basically, and I'm gonna follow the assignment. And I think he just lives his life with more flexibility, which I think is a really cool thing. But I just, yeah, I felt like at a certain point we just kind of were just doing activities, but also like by that point like it's the second day, the weather isn't great. You know, we're kind of confined by certain things, like we're physically exhausted, you know, it's raining outside. And so I feel like at that point, it kind of became like, okay, we don't really engage in directly with each other. But maybe we needed the break too. Like I kind of had made jokes about napping or going to a movie where we just didn't have to talk to each other because it's like it was a good thing, right? Like there were so many like it was just so much time together and also like you're spending a lot of time talking to each other, but then you're also doing these physically arduous things. And I feel like I sound like I'm really out of shape. I'm not. But I'm like, I was tired. And maybe he felt the same way. I didn't think at the moment, anything of it, but then kind of looking back, I was like, wait, we didn't kind of stop engaging directly..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"Am sorry. Fair enough. Does that make me feel like I was like last night, you know, like we were kind of talking, and I was like, I just kind of felt like, oh, am I not that fun? That's my own stuff, right? Someone's own perception of me. You know, especially someone like, yeah, we spent 20 hours together, but he doesn't know who I am, right? And so this is a thing that I just need to work on. Not be swayed. Like, I know who I am, or I'm working on that. And I know I'm a fun person. And my sense of fun might not be the same as someone else's, but yeah, I think I do think we are not compatible, but I think I was a little hurt that maybe he didn't think we were bad. Because everyone wants to be liked anyway, right? Again, that's a meat thing. Did he say that to you? Yeah, I think so. I think he wanted to be direct and Frank, which I also really appreciated. I wasn't sure how I was feeling to be completely honest..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"Nora, you went on a 24 hour date, which we're guessing it's probably the first time you've ever done anything like that. What in particular about this date was different than your normal date? Honestly, first and foremost, it was just like physically exhausting. I'm 35 years old. I'm in reasonably good shape. I thought, but after the first night, I literally had to put a heating pad on my head. And I was like, am I 35 or my son? Because this is like insane. But I mean, I think just like physically, it was like taxing in that respect, but I think also like, I mean, I had to commit to spending 24 hours with someone that I might not even like. And I think in this era of complete, I don't know, I feel like with the apps, people view other people sometimes, it's totally disposable, and people won't even give people 24 minutes. And here I am like, committing a full day to someone I don't know. And so a full weekend. Yeah, I was like, I have a lot of shit to do, but I'm definitely gonna just not do anything that I need to do in my life and commit to this. But yeah, I think we just were able to delve really deeply into our values our morals and I got a sense of who someone was at their fundamental level really quickly so that was definitely a really different. I feel like and I think I said this in one of my recordings. I was like, you guys just wore us down, right? Like that was like one of the things you did. And so at one point, I remember my vision of the date was definitely really different than Jeff's. I did a lot more like one on one thing. And I did like traditional date things. And he kind of my view is he kind of had like a scavenger hunt vibe to his stuff. And like, you know, I think generally, I'm a people pleaser, and I think I would have got along with some of the things he wanted, but he planned a second date and 17 hours in. He asked, we went to the Salvation army and we had to pick out things. Number one, I picked up very utilitarian things, which I don't think he like, yeah. We'll talk about compatibility later, but you know, and then he takes me to a political fundraiser. And I'm like, I'm taking this shit off. I am not going into this place. I literally looked like I looked homeless. I was wearing multiple layers of things. I just did it. I was like, by 17 hours and I definitely felt more comfortable, but I also had this paradoxical feeling of discomfort because I tend to overshare. I said this also. So like, in two hours, I can easily overshare in a date, but now you've given me 24 hours. And so I can really overshare. And so there was this sense of intimacy because of the shared time, but at the end of the day, I still don't know this person. You can't show someone 24 hours later, right? So you okay, so it's interesting. It sounded like at the beginning. It sounded like there was maybe more of a connection for you. And then as time went on, it seemed to be more this might not be the best match or not super compatible. Kind of walk us through that. What changed for you? Yeah, I mean, I think so I think physically I just didn't get to be completely Frank. I didn't feel a lot of chemistry initially, but I really, really enjoyed just personality..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"Which is fine, right? You know, it's just what it is. But the fact that we were able to connect and be as sociable with each other for that long period of time, even though we didn't know each other was really like amazing and difficult to do, but we were able to pull it off. So overall the date was like a 7 and a half, 8 out of.
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"I'm old, not old obviously bit. Heating pad after 12 mile Walking Dead. Yeah, I do think maybe there's a romantic connection, but I couldn't say that after seeing someone once, you know, that's just, for me, little impossible. And then we're back at it again for day number two at the daters met again at 10 a.m.. This time, we checked in with them around the same time as yesterday, which is 2 p.m., but we didn't get a voice memo back until 5 p.m.. So WTF, what was happening? Turns out they were having a little too much fun. Okay, here is my recording, probably two or three hours late apologize, but you know, these things happen. It's been awesome. It's been so lovely. The things that I planned out worked out even better than I thought. So I took her to my friend reims restaurant. She owns this really dope, awesome restaurant, and she was there and a bunch of my friends that also worked there were there, and they told us all about the restaurant. They gave us a tour of the restaurant, and that was really the thing because I wanted to do something different where we interacted with other people. And it wasn't just like pressure was just on us to like, oh, we can only talk to each other. So that was the strategy. Like, okay, let's do things that I wouldn't even normally do anyway. So I'm going to reams, they gave us so much extra food, which is great because I was like, our budget is only like $30. And then we went to my Friends campaign holiday party. So my friend mad haney is running for office. Some assembly district or something like that. So we crashed his party because it's a free party where they had like grits and shake it and wings and waffles and stuff like that. And then we got drinks and then we started telling everyone about this dateable podcast episode and then people started buying us drinks. I had a plan of what we were going to do next. I was actually going to take us to the mall and pass out flowers for people that we thought were really dope. But this guy just came up to us and he goes, hey, you know, y'all really cool. I've already bought your shots. You want to go to this party at Twitter. I might be going to the store department. So I don't know if he's going to actually go. We'll see if he comes through, but we're down. Oh, the other thing of like, are we more attractive to each other or less? I think we're, in my opinion, I think I'm less likely. I now know her enough to know that I'm super playful, super flexible, super, and she's just different. And I'm much more like clear about that as we've spent more and more time. And also like now she's asking less questions, so it's like not as curious. So like that's just the vibe and the interesting. But still, we're having a really fun time, so..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"Surprising thing I learned was just how much Jeff stepped up to help take care of his nephew. He moved all the way back to Chicago, got an apartment. I thought that was really incredible, and it shows, you know, how much he comes through for the people who cares about. So very surprising. Actually, I have two, so I'll tell you another one. His last date was two years ago. I was like, mine was earlier this week. Sorry, but I mean not sorry 'cause I literally don't know you. Well, I do now, but 12 hours ago I did not. So yeah, it's been really fun and I will check in with you probably another few hours. And then at the end of the day, around ten 30, we checked in with them for final time. We still could engage if there was a romantic connection here. So we really wanted to push them a little further and ask on a scale of one to ten. How would they rate the date? And did they see a romantic connection? This is getting spicy. Ten 55 p.m. lane in bed back and Oakland. Man, like I hurt my leg, like I said, we walk so much. My body was not ready to be walking that much. But anyway, to answer your question, how excited I am about tomorrow? I don't know, man. We just spent 12 hours together, like a 6, maybe a 7. Maybe after I get some rest, maybe we'll be higher. As for whether we're compatible together, I'd probably rate it like our compatibility is like a 5 out of ten. We had really amazing day, right? And we connected and I give that like 7 and a half 8 out of ten because just we really get along. But the reality is is like I'm a play guy plays like rooted in who I am and I asked her like when was the last time she played and she doesn't know, right? So it's not wrong or right. It's just different. You know, we have different like my lowest level of play is probably over and overwhelming amount of play. So we'll see tomorrow. Maybe I maybe I'm wrong about that, but yeah. We could talk all day about anything,.
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"Did I enjoy spending time with them? If the answer is yes, go on a second date. We believe in a two date default we've talked about this before, just because the first date is all about just getting to know each other in the second date you can gauge more of that chemistry. Now coming out of the second date, I think you should come out with, and from zero to a hundred. How attracted am I to this person? So that I want to see them again. Zero to a hundred. Am I past the 50% mark? And if you are, go on a third date. And I think that's how you keep progressing every day you gauge where you are on that spectrum. I think some of this is knowing yourself too, because there are some people in our audience and our listeners that give people so many tries and they don't really know what they're looking for at all. And then there's the other people that swing to the opposite side of the pendulum that are quick to get rid of people, right? So I think some of it is knowing where you are too. There is something nice about being like, I know what I'm looking for to some degree and I'm not saying that it should be qualities like they're 6 feet or whatever. But you know, like someone that makes me laugh. If I can't laugh on a date, then maybe that isn't the person for me. Or maybe not even someone that makes me laugh at someone I can laugh with like enjoy myself. So it's good to have something that are hardened non negotiables. I think that is important because if you don't have a north star, it's gonna be really hard to find anyone. That being said, if it's all superficial, non negotiables, that's another reason why maybe giving that second date or extended time could actually help you get out of your own way. So I think there's a side of understanding yourself and where you are..
Dateable Podcast
"24 hours" Discussed on Dateable Podcast
"In the beginning, when we first posted this, so many people were like, hell, no. I would never do this. I would watch someone do this. I would never participate. And now the more we talk about it and because of the holidays, I think. Some people have said to me, if you do this again, let me know. I'm down. I'm down. So maybe this will be a rolling thing. I will say we did put out a call out on Instagram, the podcast and Facebook. We got a ton of submissions, so there's definitely a group that was eager to do it. I would say they were about 90% women. So women are way more into this than bed for whatever reason. Great women. Straight women. Call out. And I've asked a few of my guy friends if they would do it. And the answer was all no. So, of course, that's a generalization, but it is what we were seeing for whatever weird reason that women were maybe a little more receptive to this idea. So hats off to Jeff or being brave enough for this experiment. He did not need any convincing. He was like, hell yeah, I'm gonna do it. And you'll see why. His personality is just so in line with this experiment. It just makes so much sense. Yes. Yes. Before we get into this episode, I want to give a few shout outs because I realized that so many people listen to the podcast and then we talk about it on DMs or through email or even through an in person conversations and we forget that we had these conversations. So I want to give a shout out to my friend Venus, who's a goddess. Through and through, and she's been listening to our podcast and Julie, I don't know if you have friends who are like, I keep hearing you talk about a podcast you do. And I finally got a chance to listen to it. It just shows that not all of our friends actually listen to our podcast, but this is like, I finally listened to it. I'm hooked on it. I listened to it on my commute. You guys are so funny and so engaging and I enjoyed every episode. So I want to give a reverse shout out to Venus. Thank you so much for listening to our show. And for being entertained by us, because we entertain ourselves, too. I love that name. Definitely goddess. You know, it's interesting because we have so many interactions with people on a weekly basis that sometimes if they happen early at the week I forget by the time it's the intro. Because every week feels it's weird. I feel like time goes really slow and really fast at the same time. Things that happen, day ago, somehow, I feel like is a month ago, even though it was a day ago. It's a time warp. Yes. Before we get into our question, I want to ask you your opinion on one thing that's came up for me earlier. Oh, holiday related. And it kind of made me think about it when you were talking about our Friends listening to the podcast 'cause I may offend people, so hopefully people so if you're a friend of Julie, you can just turn off the podcast now..
Nobody Told Me That! with Teresa Duncan
"24 hours" Discussed on Nobody Told Me That! with Teresa Duncan
"What about patients who are angry so we have all had the patients that call on the phone and they're angry about maybe a bill or maybe they're in pain and they were told they weren't going to be paying whatever the scenario when a patient calls angry. Yes you have to deal with it immediately. But it's a problem because you're stuck. You're stuck what about times that you made a mistake and you had to accept that you were wrong. And you're beating yourself up about it. Okay so. I gave you some scenarios. But what i want to do is give you some advice for a few of these. Say you're having an argument with the upper management or the boss. Well i have always taught in coach that if you are going to come to your boss with a problem and it's going to be vice versa. If you're going to come to them with the problem it really should not be around you. Let me give you an example of exception if somebody's harassing you if somebody's being very rude to you. That of course is all about you. And that that i can understand but what i'm talking about is the performance of another employee or the fact that this new practice purchase is not working out. We need to keep ourselves in our emotions out of it because ultimately when you make it about their leadership style or year leadership style it becomes personal. What i would love for you to do is lead with the idea that we need to think about how it affects the practice. The think about this when you tell me that you don't like how sarah runs the morning. Huddle it's annoying. She talks a lot. I don't ever understand what she's talking about dc. I made it all about sarah. And i made it all about me. Think of it differently. I'd really like to talk about how the morning huddle is run. I don't feel. I'm getting enough information to work with the patients. Can we do this differently. What you are doing is tying it back to patient care. It all comes back to patient care not necessarily even the health of the practice because the health of the practice ties back to patient care. So i want you to if you're going to come to anybody with a critique or a concern don't make it about you make it about the impact to the practice in the impact on patient care so if jill is always late in the mornings and it's bugging you and you're talking to the boss and you're like you know what she needs to be fire. She does this all of the time. You're complaining about jail now and all that you're going to hear. Is you complaining about jill and you know in your personal life if you have two people that don't like each other and all they do is complain to each other. What happens over time when you start to hear them. Talk about it you go. Yeah yeah yeah in your mind. You're doing yeah. Yeah yeah yeah. You've heard it before it's going to go the same way. There's nothing new to add to it and that's why we can't make it personal. I'd rather you do is talk about the fact that when jill is lay it affects everything so i am having a hard time making sure that i can get my patients seated on time when i don't know what's what's on the schedule. The schedule's not clear. So i really need you to help me understand what i'm supposed to do with my first second third patients. I don't have anybody here to tell me this. And i'm really afraid. It's going to affect the patient. The other part of that is let's go with the morning. Muddle morning huddle issue because this is this comes up a lot either. Somebody doesn't contribute to the morning huddle or somebody is always late to the morning..