23 Burst results for "1300S"
Stuff You Should Know
"1300s" Discussed on Stuff You Should Know
"Yeah, I think the point has got to be that very, like you had to be a very well-heeled person trying to impress other people by owning a copy of this thing back then, right? Yeah, or a library. Well, exactly. So yeah, that was the first edition. It's gotten even bigger as we've seen over time, and so now, finally, the internet was born, I think, to house the third edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, which is where we're at now, and one thing that they do, which is pretty sharp, as the dictionary comes out, new words are being added to it all the time. They're probably finding less and less old words that they hadn't included, but like you said, the English language is living, so it's expanding and contracting and adding new words to it all the time, so by the time those things go to press and that last volume of the edition comes out, there's words that are left over that are just constantly being added, so I think on a quarterly basis, they release supplements, essentially, that have new words that came out or were coined since the volume that contained that letter was published in the latest edition. That's right, and we'll get to how those supplements figured in back then and what they do with those today, but the other really unique thing about the OED is that it is, and always has been from the very, very beginning, a crowdsourced work. Right from the beginning, the editors, who we're going to talk about the original editors here in a minute, they said, hey, public, we need help, so if you're into this, you've got a little time, if you like to read, if you're a linguist, you're into words, if you can find these words that we're looking for, find usages of these words to send into us by hand on, they call it a slip, a little four by six sheet of paper, and mail it into us and you could very well have a hand in creating the Oxford English Dictionary. Yeah, pretty cool, and they got a really great response to it and I think still do today. Oh, for sure, but that also explains why you have quotes from Chaucer and Shakespeare and also, as Allison points out, quotes from a social media post as a usage example of a word. Yeah, she also used an example that came from the most recent quarterly update from September 2023, Porch Pirate appears in there, and so it's a really good illustration of what the doorsteps, everybody knows that, but did you know that it first came about from a news segment on KFOR from Oklahoma City's, one of their local broadcasting stations? Yeah, so they'll have that. Wait, you did know that? No, well, no, I said they would have that as like the example or whatever, and then if you want to dig deeper and just say, well, what about this word Porch, then they'll take you back to the 1300s with the definition of Porch and then examples of these, what they call senses, like that's when a, not a tense, it's a sense, it's like how the word is used basically. Yeah, and it might not be used that way anymore necessarily. Yeah, but they will have all of them listed and you can see sort of the evolution of not only the word Porch, but when you eventually get to something like Porch Pirate. Yeah, so it's pretty neat stuff, like that's what they do and they've been doing this for 100 something years since I think the first volume of the first edition came out in I think 1884, right? Yeah, and those supplements you were talking about, I promise to kind of explain how they do things now, they were, for many, many years they were released just like, hey, here's this extra thing, but it created a problem if you're like, well, wait a minute, now I have to look up a word in two different places if it has a more modern usage. And so eventually they started combining them. I think they finally did that in, what, 1989, where the supplements were actually worked into the main edition. Yeah, just the first edition. Yeah, so they finished that in 1989, a couple years before that they had finally put it on a CD-ROM and then like you said, it only exists today, well, I mean you can get copies, but they're not releasing, I don't think print editions any longer, it's just an online subscription type thing now. Yeah, and usually, I mean it's pay, right, so yeah, subscription, so usually you can log in through your library. Pretty neat. They're also in the midst of putting out a third edition, so look for that in the next century. That's right. I say we take a little break, Charles, and then we'll come back and talk about the history of the OED, how we got here. Let's do it.
The Charlie Kirk Show
"1300s" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"And so, you know, maybe the movie will be good, maybe it'll be bad, but there's an interesting thing about this, which is, well, Denzel Washington is black, of course. And so they're going to be portraying Hannibal as African. And so this is, Carthage is in modern Tunisia. It is in Africa, but the Carthaginians themselves were actually, they probably would have looked, kind of would have looked like Israelis to us, or Middle Easterners. They were Phoenicians. Their homeland was in kind of modern Lebanon. And they built all these colonies across the Middle East. They had a maritime empire and they're the ones who fought Rome. But now it is, they're going to be portrayed as fully African, which is kind of a, it's a common argument people have made, kind of much like how they argued that the, you know, the Egyptian pharaohs may have been African and the pyramids were built by black Africans. And this pairs with another story that also came out this week. There is a wild story from the British Broadcasting Company in the once free nation of Great Britain. This headline is, it really has to be heard to be believed, Black Women Most Likely to Die in Medieval Plague, Museum of London says. And so this is no joke. Some researchers at the Museum of London dug up some skeletons from a medieval grave and they started measuring the skulls exactly like you would do in like 1800s, you know, kind of what we would call like racist pseudoscience today, where they just measure skulls and kind of derive racial traits from this. And that's always bad. You're not supposed to do that, except if you're doing it to say that white people are bad, which is what they were doing here. So they measured these skulls of people who died in the black death in about 1350. And they said, based on these skull measurements, we think that these skeletons are of black people. And then they said, black people were proportionally more likely to have died in this cemetery that is for plague victims. And so we believe that black people were more likely to die in 1300s London than white people from the black death, the bubonic plague, because of systemic racism in 1300s England. Now a few contextual things here before we dig into it. One, in 1350 the Portuguese hadn't even, you know, gotten past the Sahara yet, so we did not have the ability to sail to Central Africa where, you know, Sub-Saharan Africans live. There are really no sources on Africans being in London at this time. I'm sure one might have popped up as a novelty, but they seem to be arguing that London was about eight to ten percent black like it is today, and then I guess they just all disappeared. Perhaps the black death killed them, and that's why London didn't have any of them from 1400 until, you know, the 20th century.
WCPT 820
"1300s" Discussed on WCPT 820
"The Foundation Fighting Blindness. Together, we're winning. Learn more about how you can help us end blinding diseases at FightingBlindness .org www www www www .fightingblindness .com In the case in Colorado, there's a lawsuit to throw from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington from CREW, claiming that Donald Trump should not be on the ballot in Colorado because, you know, 14th Amendment Section 3, which says that if you've supported or given aid and comfort to an insurrection, you can't hold public office. Trump is arguing that pledge the that he took to be president does not say that he has to support the Constitution. Honest to God, I'm not making this up. The pledge that the president takes says that they must preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, but support. And so Trump is saying, I have no obligation to support the Constitution and therefore you can't keep me off the ballot. Therefore, what I did was not, you know, insurrection or whatever. I don't think this is gonna work, but what I find most amazing about this is that this is a major lawsuit in a major state that is a swing state that could have a huge effect on the election in 2024. And it's getting no coverage in the media. Can you imagine if there was a possibly successful effort to get Biden off the ballot? It would be constant. But know, you hey, bad news for Trump? Nah, let's not report on that. No big deal. Media Meanwhile, Matters is reporting about misinformation, xenophobia, and grifting, you know, what's going on over at Fox so -called news. This is pretty amazing. This is from Media Matters. Right -wing media spread false the claim that the Biden administration helped finance the attack on Israel by unfreezing previously sanctioned Iranian funds. The source of this lie is a prisoner exchange last month. The Biden administration with negotiated Iran. This exchange freed five Americans from unjust captivity while making six billion in frozen Iranian funds accessible for humanitarian purposes in a restricted, cutter -based account. After Hamas's attack, conservative pundits claimed the unfrozen funds were used to arm the terrorists, which is simply not true. Fox's own correspondent, Jennifer Griffin, explained that. But Kellyanne Conway is continuing to push this lie. Thanks for watching. Now you've got Fox talking about, well, there's a Hamas sleeper cells in the United States. You better be afraid, better be very afraid. And more and more of these coming over the southern border. Come on, if Hamas wants to send somebody into the United States to recap it, they'll it do the same way that Bin Laden sent his 18 people into the United States. They'll come in here on student visas or tourist visas. They'll fly in on an airplane. Are you kidding? What we're seeing now is right wing media embracing 9 -11 style Islamophobia all over again. Donald Trump Jr. told people to go out and buy an AR -15. Right, radically increase the probability child in your house is going to die. Steve Bannon is using the attacks to sell gold. Benny Johnson is promoting gold. This is incredible. One other just kind of anecdote, this also for me matters. Fox had been all in on Bobby Kennedy Jr. when he was in running the Democratic primary. Now that he said he's an independent, he went on Hannity's show on October Sean 10th and Hannity basically took him apart, at least according to media matters. I didn't see the segment, but it sounds like it was pretty grim. I think Fox is of kind over it. We'll see. Charlie Kirk telling his audience, keep your keep your firearms activated because there are terrorist immigrants bringing a gun with you in public. The vast majority of Muslims live in the 1300s and hold a medieval worldview, says Trump. Hamas is the outlier. They are not the mainstream. And you know, what leads you differently is not telling you the truth. It's just it's just that simple. Meanwhile, Robert has Reich a suggestion for the House of Representatives. And you know, maybe this op -ed by Robert Reich this morning over on his Substack newsletter, roger, rober reich dash dot dot com. Maybe this is. You know what led to the to the Republicans in the House having all these meetings today, these bipartisan meetings.
The Charlie Kirk Show
"1300s" Discussed on The Charlie Kirk Show
"About two weeks ago I gave a speech and I said we are a fatigued nation. I certainly feel that way. Every day I come up with energy and passion. You must intentionally work on your happiness. It takes a lot for me to get into a place where I feel a sense of heaviness. Dennis Prager taught me that. It's also a biblical idea that happiness doesn't happen to you, that you must be intentionally joyful. Joyful in the Lord. Joyful in our relationship with Christ. I'll be very honest, these last couple days I've felt that sense of heaviness. It's very hard to escape. From 15 days to slow the spread, to Florida Palooza, to the burning of our country, to vaccine mandates, to people losing their jobs, to the 2020 election, to January 6, to the police state that followed. Donald Trump facing 700 years in federal prison. Two weeks ago you'd say, what else? Can we get a break? And the answer is no. You're not living in a time for a break. It's not the time, as we say commonly on this program, for the sunshine patriot, the summer soldier. Somebody recently at an event said, Charlie, I am worn out. Yep. Get over it. Get over it. We got a fight here with our Marxists. That is a civilizational type fight. And breaking in just the last couple of minutes, it seems, and it appears, I'm doing my best not to fall into the fog of war stuff. Okay. It seems as if there is another front war with Israel. They've been attacked by Hezbollah to the north and Israel is soon probably going to be involved in a two front war. Gaza and Hezbollah. We have firsthand reports of people we know in bomb shelters. I have two text messages from IDF soldiers that are high up in the IDF. They said the them being excited, but it sure seems that way. And reports are confirming that we are a fatigued nation. Some of it is intentional. We didn't ask for this whole thing in Israel, but now it is. It's the number one story on the planet. Not just because what has happened with Israel, but obviously the ramifications. And this program is going to be your home of calm. As Steve Bannon said this morning, we're going to talk about facts. We're not going to panic. We're not going to do hyperbole. We're not gonna do exaggeration because our dog in the fight is America, this country, our interests. We're going to call out people on both sides when they get way too excited and they overwhelm the narrative with a motive type psychobabble. And if a Republican says it or a Democrat says it. And I do want to hear from you this because we haven't done this this week. How are you thinking about the Israel conflict? Email me freedom at charliekirk.com. What do you believe? What should America's role be? Do you care about this? Are you passionate about it? Are you looking at this carefully and closely? However you feel. We have a great relationship together. Me as the host news, the audience email me freedom at charliekirk.com. I think it's instructive to play one piece of tape. Mark Milley, boy, he really exited at a convenient time. He just gets out about a week ago. We didn't cover Milley at all. Milley is not a good person. He should never have been in charge of effectively the U.S. military with Lloyd Austin. And there's a shocking piece of tape that I think needs to frame the American response in the Middle East. Mark Milley was reflecting on our time in Afghanistan and he was asked bluntly, was it worth it? Was it worth it, our involvement in Afghanistan? And his answer should factor into how we as Americans think about what is happening in the Middle East. Play cut 101. To those who served in Afghanistan for two decades and lost family members and friends and wonder, was it worth it? That's always the question, right? So 2,461 killed in action by the enemy in Afghanistan over 20 years. Was it worth it? Look, I can't answer that for other people. Wow. That's the guy in charge of all of the military. And he says, I can't answer that. Yeah, a lot of people died, but I can't answer that. Twenty years, 20 plus years, trillions of dollars spent, thousands of lives lost, hundreds of thousands of people in bedlam. And by the way, remember, he was the traitor that went behind Trump's back to the Chinese and he can't clearly answer whether or not it was worth it. So that right there should just be a little bit, not a little bit, a massive reminder as we are looking, what's happening in Israel. And we should, we should factor in how America is going to respond because I'm going to be very honest with you, the way that this is trending, the way that this is going, the pressure is going to go from Israel onto America very, very soon to front war. And it's going to be beyond munitions and arms and special forces. And America is going to have to decide. America is going to have to decide what it does. Air support, ground troops. I say, no U.S. troops. There's got to be a red line. And I say, after this, you got Mark Milley going on TV and saying, I don't know if it's worth it. Have we learned nothing? Israel is more than capable of defending itself and handling more than capable. And I draw ire from both camps for this position, by the way, some people say, Charlie, you're too pro Israel. First of all, I'm pro America and I'm a proud Christian. Israel changed my life. Visiting Israel changed my life. If you've never been to Israel, I don't expect you to understand what I'm saying. But when I saw where our Lord rose from the dead, where our Lord walked on water, where I saw the garden of Gethsemane, where he prayed before he was betrayed and arrested, when I saw Hebron, where Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were buried, changed my life and made the Bible more real and made me a far more serious Christian. On the other extreme, I think that some people are completely out of control on cable television, like Lindsey Graham. He is completely out of control. So this has been a and you say, is there a way there should be to support our allies and support the country while not getting us into an endless quagmire, another no win situation? I love Israel. Not as much as I love America, obviously, but a lot of the establishment, they love war. They love war more than anything else. It's as if conflict gives them strength and energy, power. What happened in Israel this last weekend, the more we learn about it, the harder it is to grasp if you are unfamiliar with the uncivilized world. Part of the problem of our universities is you have a bunch of sheltered brats that believe the rest of the world lives in air conditioning with common law, defense of children. They live such a sheltered worldview, they can't even possibly grasp the idea that people would break into another country and seek out the women and children and mow them down at a concert. Seek out infants. It's hard for people to even grasp. In fact, some people think, oh, it's war propaganda. It wasn't that hard for me to grasp because people that still live in the 1300s, as a vast majority of Muslims do, they don't hold Western values. Now, this is civilization, a.k.a. Western values versus barbarism, also known as medieval worldview. If you're fatigued, I get it. I understand. You've lived through a lot these last couple years. You didn't ask for it. You didn't invite it. And if it's too much for you, go watch Lifetime. I'm sure there's some shallow movie of somebody who falls in love and makes you feel good. This is not happy talk hour. This is the entire civilization, the planet, dare I say, even the species. It's heavy stuff. It's time to buckle up, find solutions, understand our priorities and learn lessons of the last couple of decades. Call out the extremism and the paranoia and the panic on both sides and pray for some clarity. Most importantly, stay calm. Exploration, passion and emotion. That is what his life is all about. Make sure you guys are sleeping well. It's a major part of life. Check it out right now. Relief factor dot com, relief factor dot com. So let's let's make sure we call out the over the top. Lindsey Graham is totally wrong here. Lindsey Graham is almost cheerleading for another regional war because if he wants us to go to war with Iran, let me be very clear. War with Iran is a terrible idea, a terrible idea. Sanctions, cutting off flows of money, fine. What Lindsey Graham is talking about here would be catastrophic. Let's just remember, we don't have a border. There are 10 million people that just waltz into our country. Even if we needed to go to war with Iran, I don't trust our military. I don't trust our preparedness. We don't have munitions. We don't have a troops with morale. We're a divided country. Even if we were at our strongest, it's a bad idea and we are not at our strongest. We don't have the resources. It's a bad geopolitical decision, not to mention we have thirty three trillion dollars in debt. China is ascendant and Lindsey Graham is going on and on and on. He needs to be called out here. He needs to be called out and saying, Lindsey Graham, this is a recklessly irresponsible thing to say on television. Play cut 92. Well, for every Israeli or American hostage executed by Hamas, we should take down an Iranian or refinery. The only way you're going to keep this war from escalating is to hold Iran accountable. I am confident this was planned and funded by the Iranians. Hamas is a bunch of animals who deserve to be treated like animals. So if I was Israel, I would go in on the ground. There is no truce to be had here. I would dismantle Hamas. This is the best opportunity Israel has to destroy Hamas. Take it to the Iranians. It is now time to take the war to the Ayatollah's backyard. OK, OK, OK, OK. Now it's time. So first of all, not time, not time. Take the war to the Ayatollah's backyard. That would be a declaration of war against Iran, just so we're clear. That would be a declaration of war against a serious country. Iran, first of all, the Iraq war depleted our resources, lowered national morale. Iran is a far more powerful country than Iraq, like significantly more powerful. It's 87 million people strong. The Iranian National Revolutionary Guard, that's a serious military. Could we handle them? Yeah, if you want to lose like a hundred thousand people in war. Iran is four times the size of Iraq when we invaded. It's all mountains. It's not a flat desert. You want to talk about strengthening Iran? You would strengthen Iran's resolve by bombing their oil refineries, sanctions, all that stuff is fine. Sure. And understand, this is all not by accident. Iran does not want peace. Hamas does not want peace. As this was boiling up, Mohammed bin Salman, who's in charge of Saudi Arabia because his dad basically has dementia, the crown prince and Israel were close to signing a peace deal. Iran does not want that. Saudi Arabia hates Iran. OK, Shia, Sunni, irreconcilable, completely different forms of Islam. They want they're at each other's throats. Eighty five percent of all Muslims in the world are Sunni. Fifteen percent of Shia and like 90 percent of all Shia Muslims are in Iran. Like the whole country is Shia Islam. Sunni is the predominant strain of Islam. And Saudi Arabia was close to signing a historic peace deal with Israel. Iran wants to do whatever they possibly can. And they're it's working. So the the Iranian calculation was this. OK, we can't allow Israel and Saudi Arabia to grow closer because that will hurt us or damage us or isolate us. So what Iran did is they started to plan this clandestine subterranean type military operation where the Iranian play, just so you know, the Iranian play is to try to get the entire Arab Muslim world united against Israel. So the Iranian calculation is just use Hamas and the Palestinian Authority as human shields. Doesn't matter how many Muslims or Arabs die. Israel will probably overreact. OK, Israel will probably overreact and then you'll be able to rise up the regional Arabs. And honestly, part of Iran's plan is working. Part of it is not working.
Evangelism on SermonAudio
"1300s" Discussed on Evangelism on SermonAudio
"The modern view is different uh and he uses value judgment of course this was lewis he was probably writing in the 1940s or 50s with this he says it does not believe that value judgments are really judgments at all okay and what he's saying here okay objective reality isn't objective reality this is the modern mindset and we're past the modern mindset we're in the hyper modern mindset or post -modernism but nevertheless they are sentiments or complexes or attitudes produced in a community by the pressure of its environment and its traditions and differing from one community to another and then listen if you weren't following that that's okay to say that a thing is good morally good right to say that the thing is good is merely to express our feelings about it and our feelings about it is the feelings we've been socially conditioned to have well that's that is the way of the world today right it's it moral things are not objective realities because not only moral things just anything is not an objective reality okay everything is subjective but moral things are subjective realities that you've been conditioned because you live in a certain community and other communities you know social constructs whatever you know economic social whatever they don't have these ideas and so they have different moral values and that so it's real clear morality is just what's made up within a group of people and that's the way it is and it's no different about any other feeling that you would have about something okay again the idea of you know earlier you know and not say everybody thought this way but the general view of things was a realist view okay that there's an object the object of our knowledge is reality and it's intelligible and what we know about things is composed of real essence or natures or something like this so here's the here's the thing and it's just true and it's kind of funny or amazing or whatever you want to think about this all starts to change way back in like the 1200s and 1300s and and
The Maverick Paradox Podcast
"1300s" Discussed on The Maverick Paradox Podcast
"Like, the impossible to some people is achieved every day by people who are not better than us, who are not smarter than us, they just don't give up. And that's who I am, my core. I will, like, if me and you, if you and me and somebody else go, we're walking on a treadmill, let's see who gets off first, the last one to get off is the winner, I'm going to die before anybody gets off the treadmill. I'm going to f*** and die. So, it's like, that is the spirit of real entrepreneurship. And, you know, I was in the UK, right? And, you know, our UK office, and I remember we're back a couple years back for the first time. And of course, you have to know the tea company, Twining. So, I went to their actual location. And I'm sitting there looking at placards on walls from the 1300s or 1400s of, like, different people taking over the family business, and obviously, to wherever it is today. And the first person who started that business, like, did not have all the luxuries and royalties and like, you know, the royal stamp of approval, the crest, whatever, what's that title called again? Oh, well, the Royal Petroness. Yes, exactly. Like, if the royal family taught the earth or whatever. Yeah, yeah, they, yeah. When you get that, it's basically saying that, you know, you've got like an official stamp from the money. Yeah, correct. And so, like, literally, like, the person who started that company, whatever they had to go through to get it to the point where, boom, here it is today now, like, literally thousands of years later, like, mind blown. Like, I'm a big chamomile tea drinker. Love my tea. I'm not a coffee guy. I'm a tea guy. But literally, like, yeah, anyway, so I'm rambling again, but I just wanted to make sure I got that out. No, that's very cool. Before we end, John, what lessons have you learned on your path to success that you can share with others now?
AdExchanger Talks
"1300s" Discussed on AdExchanger Talks
"You're listening to AdExchanger Talks, this is Allison Schiff, and my guest this week is Wendy Dunlap, EVP of Business Intelligence and Audience Science at MediaHub Worldwide, which is an IPG agency. We're going to cover a lot of ground in this episode from the trend towards performance -based planning to artificial intelligence to dealing with signal loss, of course, to data ethics and the concept of conscious marketing. And so, without further ado, let's kick off this episode. Although, fun fact for those who are interested, the word ado, from the phrase without further ado, apparently dates back as far as the 1300s, but was more commonly used during the Tudor era as a word for complications or fuss. There's something a little meta, not the company, the actual word meta, about causing ado by explaining ado. So anyway, let's talk to Wendy. Wendy, welcome to the podcast. Thank you for having me, Allison.
Native Opinion Podcast an American Indian Perspective
"1300s" Discussed on Native Opinion Podcast an American Indian Perspective
"Purchase or conquest, the title to or possession of those lands by indigenous peoples. And it hasn't. That's repeating what I said a moment ago that these lands were taken at if we put in context of order, let's not, let's not dilute that. By knife or by musket, I say. These folks came, they saw that these lands were fertile, but there were people in the way. And the only thing they understood was how to remove people by force. And that's exactly what happened. So later, beginning and probably the mid 17th century, where land title was more prevalent because lands had to be distributed to settlers, that was a concept that they understood from whence they came. That's when more lands were taken and then sold off illegally by the stroke of a pen and the rest, if you will, if you pardon my pun is history. So going on here and we're in section 5, brother. I said, the legal concept that discovery was debated by colonial powers from the 16th century onward and found particular expression in the 19th century jurisprudence of courts in several countries, including to which the discovery of lands by settlers, granted by an exclusive right to extinguish either by purchaser conquest, the title to or possession of those lands by indigenous peoples. Certain scholars have argued that the basis of the aforementioned quote doctrine is to be found in several papal documents such as the bulls dumb, diverse as in 1452, romanus, pontifex, and 1455, an intra katerra in 1493. So those are the presumably justifications for the doctrine coming from as early as the 1400s, but I'll argue there's references earlier that go into the 1300s, but anyway. 6 reads, the doctrine of discovery is not part of the teaching of the Catholic Church, has historical research clearly demonstrates that the papal documents and question written in a specific historical period in linked to political questions have never been considered expressions of the Catholic faith. That's an interesting sidestep, isn't it? Then that needs some explanation then. Because past popes refer to it. Yep. They refer to the bulls. In fact, the thumb prints, because what is a bull or a bolus?
The Eric Metaxas Show
"1300s" Discussed on The Eric Metaxas Show
"That is not an abortion. Abortion is never necessary to save a woman's life. So let's stop talking about life in the mother. Then they talk about the health of the mother. This is an exception so big you could march the rose bowl parade through it. The health of the mother, what could not be said to affect someone's health. Your mental health. In the states that had the health of the mother exception before roe V wade, women were going and getting notes from their psychiatrist and getting abortions because it was going to make them depressed. So anybody who says health with the mother, he is pro choice. He is as bad as Planned Parenthood. And then rape and incest incest, I don't even know what that means. I don't know why incest would be an exception to abortion. Unless we're just eugenicists and we think, oh, we might have webbed fingers and extra toes and we don't want them running around America. I don't think I don't think that survives rational examination. No two headed babies. That brings us to the rape exception. People who say they want a rape exception, almost never really want that. If you really wanted that, you would say, okay, in the first within the first two weeks, after you've been raped, you have to go to the police, file a report, cooperate with the investigation. If you're lying, that's illegal, you can be prosecuted for making a false rate report. So you would, if you really believe that the rape exception is morally necessary, you would carve out a very small one that woman who goes to the police and files a rape charge within a very narrow window of time can have an abortion. It's tragic. It's not right, but we don't want to put that burden on rape victims. That would make some rational sense. That's not what people want. They want women to be able to go in and say, yeah, I was a rape. Oh, okay, stamp. The Christine blasey Fords of this world. We're willing to lie under oath about being raped to get what they want. So it would be an absolutely meaningless loss. Okay, we got plenty more talking to John smirk. We want to remind you, Christian solidarity international is freeing slaves literally, but we need your help. We really need your help. You can go to metaxas talk dot com. That's the easiest way or you can dial 8 8 8 two 5 three 35 22 8 8 8 two 5 three 35 22. We really need your help. 8 8 8 two 5 three 35 22 or go to metaxas talk dot com. Just the other day I heard so. Welcome back, folks. We're talking to John S mirak. Oh my goodness. John, this weekend. King Charles the third was officially crowned all very ritualistic. I spoke at length to Naomi wolf about it in our one. Do you have any observations on that event? Yeah, I'm really, really glad the British monarchy survives. Even though it doesn't wield any power, even though I'm a half Irish. And I'm almost genetic, you know, my genes scream at the British monarchy, the way yours do at the Ottoman Empire, Eric. Being Greek. But as an American, I need to recognize that our freedoms are ordered liberty, come from no place else, but England. That the peculiar history of the English monarchy, and its relationship to the English parliament and the English people. The back and forth battle for power between the king, the parliament and the people, has produced the freest society in the history of the world. And it's interesting that our independence was a rebellion against Great Britain. Great Britain was the freest society on earth at the time. We wanted more. But the point is we weren't rebelling against the Ottoman Empire or the Mongol conic cons. We were rebelling against a pretty darn good monarchy that for hundreds of years had been subjecting the king's powers to the power of parliament. Starting in the 1300s with the Magna Carta, the English monarchs had century John. I'm sorry. Thank you. 13th century. With the Magna Carta, the English monarchs had to ask the parliament for taxes. The power of the purse was in the hands of the nobility and then of the common people. And they were individual rights constitutional rights..
The Eric Metaxas Show
John Zmirak Reflects on the Significance of the British Monarchy
"To John S mirak. Oh my goodness. John, this weekend. King Charles the third was officially crowned all very ritualistic. I spoke at length to Naomi wolf about it in our one. Do you have any observations on that event? Yeah, I'm really, really glad the British monarchy survives. Even though it doesn't wield any power, even though I'm a half Irish. And I'm almost genetic, you know, my genes scream at the British monarchy, the way yours do at the Ottoman Empire, Eric. Being Greek. But as an American, I need to recognize that our freedoms are ordered liberty, come from no place else, but England. That the peculiar history of the English monarchy, and its relationship to the English parliament and the English people. The back and forth battle for power between the king, the parliament and the people, has produced the freest society in the history of the world. And it's interesting that our independence was a rebellion against Great Britain. Great Britain was the freest society on earth at the time. We wanted more. But the point is we weren't rebelling against the Ottoman Empire or the Mongol conic cons. We were rebelling against a pretty darn good monarchy that for hundreds of years had been subjecting the king's powers to the power of parliament. Starting in the 1300s with the Magna Carta, the English monarchs had century John. I'm sorry. Thank you. 13th century. With the Magna Carta, the English monarchs had to ask the parliament for taxes. The power of the purse was in the hands of the nobility and then of the common people.
THE EMBC NETWORK
"1300s" Discussed on THE EMBC NETWORK
"I don't know. But then I just really go back to, I have to, it's a virus, whatever it is, as long as I'm healthy, then I'm good. So I just keep going back to that. But do you see anything? Is there anything from what you're reading? And I know you're very well read and there's a lot of sources that you seek out, anything as far as like hoax, do you think this could be a conspiracy theory or some kind of I'm not an expert, right? I don't want to claim on it because I'm not an expert. But I love the research. I love to read, especially when it goes to health, right? And so it's overblown, whatever it is, in my opinion, because of what we just talked about. And I've read a lot of stuff that talk about germ theory and how we may have gotten it wrong. And it's interesting. It may not be a 100%. I don't know, but I keep researching. But what it has led me to, which I do like, because in college, I was a history minor. I love history, right? It's made me read some stuff. In fact, I ordered a book and I read some stuff on the black, the black plague. From the 1300s. It was a play caused by a disease from fleece. The rats that carry the fleas and it wiped out half the population of most of the earth, right? In some places more in some places less. Some places in England at wiped out 8% of some towns were down in the southern Italy and stuff that didn't wipe out as many. So it seems to be maybe you have to do with latitude there. But, you know, and I was reading some stuff about it. It's pretty fascinating. That's why we're the books I want to get more into it.
Stuff You Should Know
"1300s" Discussed on Stuff You Should Know
"Spectrum that you can just walk right up and say, I believe this and you're as right as anybody and the Robin Hood train. Yeah, so if we go back in time, you know, I think everyone knows that early historians had a lot of blanks, and they weren't the most reliable narrators. No, because they would just fill them in with stuff they made up. Yeah, because I think they didn't, I don't know if they realized that early on, I'm speculating here that they were historian. Yeah, they're like recording history. I think it was more like, hey, this is a good story. And I don't know in 500 years people are going to be taking this as written history. There's been a yarn. In this case, I don't think that's correct. I think that they consider themselves actual historians who were getting to the bottom of history, but they had a worldview and specifically with Robinhood. It was 15th century or 16th century Scottish historians. Who were the ones who really kind of gave us the image of Robin Hood that they were so drunk. The robbing from the rich to give to the poor. The chivalry, a lot of that stuff. Anti establishment. Yeah, that actually was part of it before. They had to kind of figure out how to make that one work. Because it didn't make sense to them at the time. But they basically said, here we've got these ballads that were written in the 1300s, the 14th century. And we think their historical, so we're going to try to put this in context and the stuff we don't understand. We're just going to make up. But we're going to pass it off as real. So it's one of those great things like with fairytales. We know all these pictures and you remember we did those episodes on it. Yeah, those are good.
Native America Calling
"1300s" Discussed on Native America Calling
"Of horses that you've found documentation or evidence that they lived? It sounds like at least a hundred years before the contemporary narrative places them. Yes. So if we're talking about these, the horses that we have dated in, the Rocky Mountains in great plans, right? So we're looking at a sample of horses that exist basically in between Utah and Iowa. And north of Albuquerque. So we're not looking. There's a couple horse remains that we have dated in Mexico City. So primarily we're looking at horses that are within the central continental U.S.. And then as you've mentioned, there's actually a couple of horses that we looked at. And the Yukon in Alaska. And when it comes to these dates, we were able to get at least ten, ten of these horses from Nebraska, Kansas, Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming that showed they were alive prior to the club revolt of 1680. And then we also showed that there were horses that were around post 1700. When it comes to the when it comes to radiocarbon dating, radiocarbon dating can't give a precise one year range just because the nature of how the sun radiates carbon 14 to the earth, it's not a straight lineal line. There's wiggles in it. So that's where we get those plus or plus or minus states. So with these smaller age ranges and with the use of Bayesian statistical modeling, we can plug these dates into an algorithm and figure out how old these samples are and that's where we're getting these pre 1680 gate ranges for a number of these of these horses. Okay, so pre 1680, but we're not really sure how much earlier than that. So for instance, you know, the 1300s of the 1400s. Do we have any data that supports it horses could perhaps have been used by Native American people for maybe three, four, 500 years before
WTOP
"1300s" Discussed on WTOP
"Sports hit 25 and 55, powered by maximus, moving people and innovation forward. Here's Frank hammerhand. All right, capitals in the Panthers tied up at two two late in the second period from capitol and arena in fact 3.7 seconds left as they're about to head to the second intermission Dylan strome and Tom Wilson goes to the capitols playing tonight without captain. Alex Ovechkin he's out with an upper body injury, listen to his day to day baseball stone Garrett. Yes, don't get it. Three run Homer for the nationals. That's a three zip lead going on right now. I had Colorado's. They play this one in the top of the fourth inning as a Trevor Williams getting to start for the nationals looking good so far. And that's what the three zip lead in the top of the fourth at Colorado. Yankees and the Orioles going at it in New York with a four one lead over the bird sets in the top of the 6th at Camden yards on the pitch D.C. United and Columbus from Audi field and D.C.'s got some work to do, trailing two nil in the 53rd minute master suspended because of the wet weather. Brooks Koepka is your leader at the 1300s got to finish the third. And then they'll play their final round tomorrow John rom is four shots back. Tiger Woods is at plus 9. He is last in the 54 player field, a Frank hand or a hand to be TOP sports. And coming up on WTO, the abortion pill debate is heading to another round of the higher court in that follows the dueling injunctions. Also, Ben ferencz, the last living prosecutor of the post World War II Nuremberg trials, has died at the age of a 103. 8 56
Discerning Hearts - Catholic Podcasts
"1300s" Discussed on Discerning Hearts - Catholic Podcasts
"Again, suspecting that a number of listeners, this will be a first meeting. And yet here again, just a profound woman of faith and someone who is living in that mystery in a very particular and very fruitful way. Yeah, a lot of people haven't heard of her, but let me ask you this. Have you heard of a woman called Julian of Norwich? Yes. Okay. And even hildegard von bingen. So many people did not know them at the turn of the 19 hundreds from the 1800s into the 1900s. Until they're writings were brought forward and translated. And then people got to know them. Not so much Julian because she wrote in English already. But hildegard was the same experience. Her writing started to come forward at that same time. And she comes from that same era of the 1300s around the time of Catherine of Siena saint Bridget of Sweden. At that wonderful epoch of spiritual experience of women, Julian of Norwich, of course, is from that same period too. And hedwig was of an Antwerp that's just above France. And she was probably of a royal birth or at least an upper class because she knew how to write. And she knew, but she wasn't a part of a religious order. She was a lay woman, maybe a wife, maybe a mother, or just not a 100% sure. But there was many women in that particular time that what they would gather and learn and deepen their faith life and what would become known as the big gains. We probably have a lot of them in our own neighborhood right now, but we don't have that term, right? I mean, lay women, housewives, not called necessarily. There were single life, not necessarily called a religious order, but they want to grow deeper in their relationship with God.
The Bill Simmons Podcast
"1300s" Discussed on The Bill Simmons Podcast
"Pods, we did, we did three, but only two really counted. The town, Ryan Rocco's Oscar winning performance on that. Shawshank, you can't even believe how many movies we did. Go check them all out on Monday night and go check 250th movie out, putting up again on Monday night. Speaking of things we're putting up, the ringer verse podcast is covering house of the dragon, prequel. We brought our talk to Thrones crew back at least two of them. Chris Ryan, Mallory Rubin joined by Joanna Robinson. Every time an episode ends of house of the dragon, we will have a new reaction episode up right away. Literally within seconds on the ringer verse podcast and then Mallory and Joanna are breaking it down a little later in the week on the house of our podcast with their deep dive of whatever happened that week. So Game of Thrones was in the 1300s. So this is in the 1200s, I guess, the prequel. That's according to my math. Another new podcast we're launching, a Boston sports podcast. It turns out Spotify did a ton of research and they said, we are not talking about Boston sports enough on the ringer podcast network. So we are launching off the pike with Brian Barrett, who's great. You're going to love them. It is modeled in the same kind of spirit as JJ's New York pod or Jason Goff Chicago podcast. Three times a week, four times a week, somewhere in that zone depending on what happens. Emergency stuff, any sort of trade, any big game, anything will be on right after. A ton of great guests, most excited for the guests, because Boston just has a ton of fun people we can throw on there, including people from the ringer. KFC, Ryan, myself. I finally have a place to go talk about Boston sports. I won't have to torture you on this podcast anymore. Anyway, it's launching late Sunday Night. I might even make a guest appearance on
Cinemavino
"1300s" Discussed on Cinemavino
"Oh, there's a magic book that sucked me into a vortex, and now I'm in the 1300s. He's almost in like a grungy renaissance fair. Yeah? Yeah. Yeah. The mullet on King Arthur? The bangs. When I tried to cut my hair on a high and tight. And why? Something from wrong, but why did that entire time that I think that was Nicolas Cage? He had this weird look, and I was like, is that Nicholas cage? Did I miss this? I was like, I don't know why. I thought it was in this case the entire time. Asher, yeah, you're freaking mind. Oh God. We have to steal the economic con. Yeah. No, but I loved it. I mean, this is a classic movie. I give this a solid 7 and a half out of ten? Yeah. Okay, before I need to mention this earlier, so you guys, I can't remember the second one of these. But there are, I feel like nods, Peter Jackson does in The Lord of the Rings movies. Thank you son of a bitch. I was gonna fucking say that. Okay, good. I just wanted to shoot you. You can talk about it first. I just thought. I want everybody to think about it because there's two of them and I can only remember one, but all right. Well, the font, well, hello, had a drink or two. So the first one was clearly just before the battle scene. And he was like, you have my axe. You have my that was clear with that one. Yes. The second one now, I'm not really thinking that, but it was that whole battle scene was two towers. In my mind. That was the entire scene. And I was like, and I couldn't, I loved it so much. I was like, this is amazing. What was the second one? That's my question. I want everybody to be thinking about it, because I can't remember. I tried to write it down right before the podcast. But it was like, where when he asked, he was like, he's like, oh, who's all with this? And he was like, oh, he's like, I'm with you, my lord, and he was like, yeah, you have my sword. I bow with my bow. And I was like, man, what the fuck? This is Lord of the Rings.
The Aloönæ Show
"1300s" Discussed on The Aloönæ Show
"What are the key factors when doing this? Just pay attention to your financial statements every month. And if, you know, I don't expect any business owner to do the debits and credits that are required. They can delegate that, but they can't abdicate the responsibility for reviewing their financial statements every single month. That's key. And it's painful in the beginning if you don't know what exactly what they're telling you. But you probably done harder things. Think about it from that perspective when you were learning your trade or you were learning to do marketing or you were learning to do whatever else it is. That was probably harder than learning about financial statements. It's just a little bit of terminology. And counting was invented back in the 1200s or 1300s by the Venetian monks who had to take care of the rich Italians money. So they didn't have QuickBooks. They didn't have a calculator. And you can say the Chinese had abacuses, but the Chinese were not talking to the Italians at that point. They were very distinct areas of the world. So they had to make it easy. So, you know, we have software now that helps us. We have calculators that help us. And just learn, spend ten or 15 minutes a day and learn it. It's not hard. It's pretty easy to do once you just spend a little time on it. And you'll wonder, why did I think this was so hard? It's not, it really and truly is not. Okay. Okay. What do you like about doing this? I love it when customers business owners get the financial side of their business so that they don't go out of business. They do what's necessary. They use accurate financial statements to make great business decisions and they build wealth. They build cash, they can do what they want at that particular point and have really good lives. Sounds like you guys are having really good lives too. Yeah? So what are the high and low points of your career? Low point was when we had started a business and
The Mason Minute
Celebrate With Chocolate (MM #3981)
"The mason minute. With Kevin mason. It's Valentine's Day. You have a hard time finding any chocolate around your favorite drugstore, big box store right now. And often wonder why chocolate is associated with Valentine's Day. So you have to go back to the origins of Valentine's Day. Actually the feast of saint Valentine in the year four 96. Then in the 1300s, Valentine's Day became associated with the lovey dovey stuff. Thanks to chaucer. But when did chocolate come in? When do we start celebrating Valentine's Day with chocolate? And of course, the simple answer is? Well, no one really knows. Now in Mayan culture and Aztec culture, chocolate is always been adored and treated as a symbol of love. So they're thinking, perhaps it all kind of melded together there from the category of Europe into the Catholics in Mexico associating with the Mayans and the Aztecs at least. That's what somebody's thinking, but again, nobody knows. American candymakers started getting involved in the 1860s, so the answer to our question, nobody really knows billions of dollars are spent on candy and more for Valentine's Day.
The Mason Minute
Celebrate With Chocolate (MM #3981)
"The mason minute. With Kevin mason. It's Valentine's Day. You have a hard time finding any chocolate around your favorite drugstore, big box store right now. And often wonder why chocolate is associated with Valentine's Day. So you have to go back to the origins of Valentine's Day. Actually the feast of saint Valentine in the year four 96. Then in the 1300s, Valentine's Day became associated with the lovey dovey stuff. Thanks to chaucer. But when did chocolate come in? When do we start celebrating Valentine's Day with chocolate? And of course, the simple answer is? Well, no one really knows. Now in Mayan culture and Aztec culture, chocolate is always been adored and treated as a symbol of love. So they're thinking, perhaps it all kind of melded together there from the category of Europe into the Catholics in Mexico associating with the Mayans and the Aztecs at least. That's what somebody's thinking, but again, nobody knows. American candymakers started getting involved in the 1860s, so the answer to our question, nobody really knows billions of dollars are spent on candy and more for Valentine's Day.
The Mason Minute
Celebrate With Chocolate (MM #3981)
"The mason minute. With Kevin mason. It's Valentine's Day. You have a hard time finding any chocolate around your favorite drugstore, big box store right now. And often wonder why chocolate is associated with Valentine's Day. So you have to go back to the origins of Valentine's Day. Actually the feast of saint Valentine in the year four 96. Then in the 1300s, Valentine's Day became associated with the lovey dovey stuff. Thanks to chaucer. But when did chocolate come in? When do we start celebrating Valentine's Day with chocolate? And of course, the simple answer is? Well, no one really knows. Now in Mayan culture and Aztec culture, chocolate is always been adored and treated as a symbol of love. So they're thinking, perhaps it all kind of melded together there from the category of Europe into the Catholics in Mexico associating with the Mayans and the Aztecs at least. That's what somebody's thinking, but again, nobody knows. American candymakers started getting involved in the 1860s, so the answer to our question, nobody really knows billions of dollars are spent on candy and more for Valentine's Day.
The Mason Minute
Celebrate With Chocolate (MM #3981)
"The mason minute. With Kevin mason. It's Valentine's Day. You have a hard time finding any chocolate around your favorite drugstore, big box store right now. And often wonder why chocolate is associated with Valentine's Day. So you have to go back to the origins of Valentine's Day. Actually the feast of saint Valentine in the year four 96. Then in the 1300s, Valentine's Day became associated with the lovey dovey stuff. Thanks to chaucer. But when did chocolate come in? When do we start celebrating Valentine's Day with chocolate? And of course, the simple answer is? Well, no one really knows. Now in Mayan culture and Aztec culture, chocolate is always been adored and treated as a symbol of love. So they're thinking, perhaps it all kind of melded together there from the category of Europe into the Catholics in Mexico associating with the Mayans and the Aztecs at least. That's what somebody's thinking, but again, nobody knows. American candymakers started getting involved in the 1860s, so the answer to our question, nobody really knows billions of dollars are spent on candy and more for Valentine's Day.
The Eric Metaxas Show
John Zmirak on New Film 'The Last Duel'
"I'm also talking to John smirk. What a great day. John Merrick, we've you want to talk about a movie. What do you want to talk about? I thought I'd lighten the mood a little bit and tell you about a movie that I saw, which I thought was a lot of fun. And whose message might not have been in the end, what the makers of the movie intended? This is the movie the last stool. It was the last stool, the last duel. A duel. Eric, Eric, get you digestion treated. This is warping your judgment. Wow. Because I was going to say that is the worst title for a movie. They need to feed that. The deal and it's 70 France. It's about the last trial by combat in the history of France. You know in the Middle Ages before we had elaborate developed judicial system, sometimes they would try a case and the two combat the two parties would fight it out. And the belief was the guy would give victory to the person who was in the right. Kind of like David and Goliath. Right, right. But this belief had faded mostly by the 1300s. But this is a true story, based on historians account where a powerful courtier was accused of raping a woman who was married to a much poorer, more obscure knight. And she goes to the authorities about it. The authorities side with the more powerful one, the guy who victimized her. Her husband backs her. The only way to get justice is for him to challenge the accused rapist to a combat tri. Trial by combat. And they fight it out. And in the movie, you see three different versions of the story from the husband's point of view from the accused rapist point of view and from the woman's point. This is like Kurosawa's rationale.