220: The Government's Targeting of Journalists, Lawyers and Activists on the Border
Get to old navy this Saturday for an incredible fifty percent off all jeans. That's right all genes, including rockstar and all your family's favorite styles. Are fifty percent off just one day. Only this Saturday at old navy and old navy dot com. Hurry, invalid three thirty excludes in store clearance, guys Luella here Latino rebels radio, and it is Thursday morning, March twenty eighth two thousand nineteen and we wanted to share a quick audio clip that lets you know rebels contributor sour Girling got in San Diego on Wednesday night, the twenty seventh during during a panel about how to cover the border sort of an extension of that reporting from San San Diego NBC seven about how lawyers journalists and activists are allegedly being targeted by border patrol in the federal government and ice. So here's the conversation or assist, it's conversation. It's a quick quick clip about four minutes. Here's a conversation with me the law. He she's the border legit litigation. Product senior staff attorney. For the American several for the ACLU the American Civil Liberties union. So anyway, here is the clip state your name, and your title might name is maitre Abdellah. He and I am the senior staff attorney for the border litigation at the San Diego. Great. Thanks me. So tonight here at this off more on that was. Together, by NBC, Telemundo, nausea, and many other journalists organizations we heard about the different tactics that the CDP FBI and different agencies have been using to collect data on activists and journalists now you were talking specifically about some of the protective measures that we can take to as journalists and activists to protect ourselves win. We're actually taking into secondary. But you also talking about the rogue nature that this agency has conducted itself with can you expand on that? And also on some of the measures that the is going to be undertaking in the near future to try to bring them into some sort of conduct. That is more in line with the constitution. Sure. So you know, customs and border protection is the largest law enforcement agency in the country. It's sixty thousand plus. Us people and they have consistently tried to avoid basic transparency and accountability on a number of fronts, including their agents and officers behavior at ports of entry. When they subject people to secondary inspections, which when it's targeting people based on first amendment protected activity is violation of the constitution. You know, it's it's an agency that routinely does not respond to freedom of information class. It's an agency that you as we heard on the panel. There was a request by congress for a response from C VP wants this story surfaced and CB p just ignored that request entirely. Those are just some examples among many, many of this have how this particular agency thinks that it's above the law and in terms of what people are doing to try to change that. I mean, there are a number of different efforts including litigation in federal courts, both on the freedom of information act and on constitutional claims. But also advocacy efforts trying to mobilize the public's awareness of what their rights are get stories of when those rights are being violated, and to document what is actually happening. So that they don't get away with it over time. And why do you think now the migrant caravan? I mean people have been migrating here. We've had you know, the Haitian resettlement. We've had you know, people coming from Brazil from all over why. Now, why are they conducting the manner and particularly around so much interest around the Central American caravan in the work that activists are doing this particular very vulnerable group of individuals yet. Yeah, it's really hard to say because we don't have access like I said to the they're not transparent in terms of how they operate this agency. But I personally think that it was not unrelated to the midterms. This was a we know that this is a rallying cry for the Trump face that people who have supported this administration. Do not support. US law which creates a right to seek asylum in this country. And so this is something that really mobilizes a group of people in a very particular way. And that's why I think part that's what I think is part of the motivation here. And why do you think the journalists because journalists are one of the few groups who are trying to make the public know what's happening on the ground? And without that information. It's very easy for the administration to spin its own story. So for example, as we saw for instance, on New Year's Eve when they were teargassing people near the border. The government officials story was someone was throwing rocks. Journalists on the ground reported that there were no rocks being thrown if you don't have journalists who are reporting the facts on the ground, contrary to the government narrative, it's very hard to know, what is actually happening. Thank you very much.