Bruce, Twitter, Jimmy Chica discussed on Coast to Coast AM

Automatic TRANSCRIPT

Your host Jimmy Chica. Follow me on Twitter at J church radio. He could follow Bruce at hybrid humans. Right there on Twitter. I believe I got that. Right. Bruce Fenton is an author of the revolutionary human origins e book series. The forgotten exodus was born Cheltenham's England and graduated from Anglia Ruskin university in two thousand two Bruce a world traveler and public speaker, and is current member of both paleo threat, the Paleoanthropology society and the scientific and medical network tonight. We're going to discuss our human origins and his book, the forgotten exit into Africa, the theory of human evolution and human hybrid humans scientific evidence of our eight hundred thousand year-old alien legacy written by his wife, Dan yellowfin, and I would like to welcome back to coast to coast. Bruce Feldman, Bruce, it's been awhile since you've been on coach. What have you been up to has been? Yeah, I've been carrying on with deep diving into the human origin subject reading, the kind of Connecticut is most people would probably five are boring to get more data. Yeah. And of course, always trying to discover the truth. Well, you cover my favorite subjects. Right. And that is for me when I have a conversation with a guest, and we call it an interview, I call it a conversation, but you and I can go in any direction. And I know that I'm gonna learn something. I'm just fascinated with it. But before we get to that last week. I've been just going to go here last week. There was a a little breaking news story that went viral inside of the Afo community in a concerned a document that was released by the national space council announcing a new president. Now, the contents of the document for me aren't as an as as important as it's often Tissot and the possibility of it being disinformation. You took it upon yourself to contact the national space council. And what did you find out? Yeah. I I did see there was some initial controversy around it. So let's just check this one out to find the contacts, you know, the council, I think free one of the obstacles that had been shed connecting to the document, actually. So let me to the the main contacts, and yeah, they came back saying that they would not aware of what they wasn't any change in the presidential structure council and also that they haven't heard of the person named in adult. So somebody out there for some reason, definitely seeded. Well, if you know into the community, why is not clear that is the question bruise. Why? Well, not only would this document, but in general. There is always the opportunity to spread disinformation inside of the UFO community. Why why do they continue to do this? Well, two things that firstly. I want to say that one of the problems that I find within the Kamien fringe just you Jay. It's much more likely that people will share something on wedge or argue about it in an insular way. Then we check out and check the soul. And I think that's today with the lack of trust. You know, that we many tend to have we apologize show. People are not in that habit. But because of kind of which I do I have to deal with the academics, you know, in these sources, I developed that tendency to actually go back and check so one of the things that they know that something like that will get legs, you know, people won't tend to check it. They would just argue about it. You know? I mean, that's something people have to remember trying. You can go out that we out to sausage and say, hey, you know, is this from you? But why I guess? Yeah. Sometimes it keeps us looking the wrong way, doesn't it? You know that the news is coming out that's probably important at instead, we'll be focusing on something that's important. When I read the reply that you got and the explanations in that reply that was one thing, but I looked at the Email header, and it literally said the White House when you got that reply back, and you see that what would immediately goes through your mind because we're talking about really official correspondence, aren't we? Yeah. I like, it'd be you know, the initial in carving forward it onto somebody seeing the right right funny. They actually took the time to have a look into it, you know, and come back because you know, some of these people, I guess would just be silence. You know said they must out it was with them. Putting it back out. You know, this isn't today with us. It's quite interesting. They even took the time. You're going to spend. Stuffing that was with out that this should not to do with us. They can send it's pretty fascinating to me about the the amount of documents. And this goes back in you follow g we can stretch to this back seventy years. This is anything new, but the amount of documents that spread through the U of O community that turn out to be fake. And I don't know if you wanna call it a hoax or fraud, which are two different definitions. But it's creating something that isn't real. But somebody out there created a fake document. And it when they were creating it. I think that again, I'd say that is probably again that you know that. News on that kind of trendy thing that that went to Israel fake news. It does seem to get like seeing the fringe community. And I'm not just saying if as paranormal conspiracies, look if I went now, and I had to take some old government document started putting in stuff about Etienne's and things that wasn't that put out on Twitter Facebook tomorrow, let's go it's probably gonna go quite far, isn't it without anyone really looking into whether that's real because it's exciting, you know, validate things they believe, you know, you're gonna take days weeks months before anyone really looks into whether that's real that's the problem. I think we will after address in the communities that you can hang on for. They can I did check this as being modified. Whereas the original there another copy of this document. You know, what I mean week we can go up eight in stopping those. Folks. Well, in this particular document, this national space council document that when around last week, I would have thought that that is one of the easiest things to go and check and check the sources on and I questioned why somebody would take the chances of distributing this when everybody in the community, and we're very good at checking documents these days, this is going to go in and check out the provenance. And if this indeed was a real announcement. Don't you think that somebody would have thought about that? I before letting this go. Yeah. You know, if I was thinking to some kind of joke. I would say a spec this someone he's going to do that. Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, there's there, of course, some very serious such as he's not just even picking shy. You know, see researchers that will look into it. You know? So some point it's going to get found out. So it's a strange one. Yeah. I don't know why why they would want to sort of cheat confusion knowing as well that it would like to come back home some of those involved. So it's won't does it gain. You know, we'll does actually gain. I wanted to ask you before we move on. When you go and reveal that document like that that raises a lot of eyebrows. I didn't really understand why it was actually news worthy. That's that's not actually the point. When you turn around and show everybody that, hey, this thing is in real do you get blowback from that? Are people angry at you for do? They get angry for for debunking the wrong word, but showing that document isn't what is supposed to be. Some positive feedback. But my feeling is when the people that are not happy with that usually will remain fatty quiet because I don't be anyone wants to be seen to be annoyed that the truth has come out of the innovates him embarrassing for them. Maybe they shared on woods to their friends, or whatever they probably don't happy with with me. Coming back inside. You know? Hey, you know, that's the way that I need the positive remarks come directly to me. So I think other people probably yes, they may feel that upset that haven't said anything. It's strange times in the U of O community. It's never been as strange or is exciting like it is today in many many years and now want to actually make a little bit of an announcement here. A couple of weeks ago Bruce was on my other show fade to black and during our conversation Bruce revealed that he was in process of some debris some craft debris and which caught me by surprise. But that's the beauty of doing the live radio show, and Bruce actually sent me some of the debris, and I got it last week. And thank you Bruce for sending it. I want to just say this in a general sense to everybody because this was a live show and people have asked me about it since then it it's quite I guess the word that I want to use. It's heavy. It's a heavy metal. It's a heavy metal. When I held it in my hand. And what I was sent was probably about a half inch, right? Yeah. Tha about a half inch in it's round about eighth of an inch thick, but it's density and its weight Reuss caught me by surprise that. I wasn't expecting. What is what is the material makeup of it actually got a very long list chemicals in it? You know, surprising. I look at the analysis. I think that's about twenty different compounds is mostly silica and aluminium. But there's a lot of other things even titanium in that. You've got squad list of metals in the military in. Medium. Yeah. About twenty really complex mixture one of the things. I'd like to see them see. And then you have from say aerospace, something tell me, hey, we imagine it's going to be an future. You know, a future spaceship with these chemicals because I wonder how close studies is I've seen that a lot of these compounds already in current generation spacecraft, right? So that's kind of funny thing. Yeah. If a long list chemicals, and you just mentioned titanium and aluminum and silica, but those are all light alloys where this is. It's it's pretty dense. It's pretty heavy. Yeah. That melting process, you know, as being. Actually chains quit. Yeah. It was as liquefied then frozen in space. So she has changed how would have extensively you would have been when it was in a structure show. Yeah. If you look at the very light. But yeah, feels quite heavy for quite solid. Yeah. The original way of see I guess, and you know, high temperature blackness now as well as probably would have been a different color. It is kind of translucent if you get the pieces, and you got light. And some of them are greenish as well. Yeah. It looks very mostly black, and yeah, this is a dark Brown black fascinating to look at and hold the age on this. Are we going with the the eight hundred thousand year old number yet any dates on at seven hundred eighteen thousand if some of some geologists give a little bit of that. But that's the state is around seven seven seven eighty in the studies that have been done that meshes with that what we'll come to relate this long the arguments put a strange. One of these people have noticed that some of the pieces look as though that they haven't been wetted. They haven't been in the environment long. You know, the see without be quite smooth. You know, they they've being you know, might handle hit with a lot of bad weather, and they suspicion that some of these pieces may a falling fatty recently. And I know I don't have this. They maybe some of this stuff is still falling. If you know what I mean? Jimmy, right, right. Formed right about that coming down, which is interesting as well. Now, let's let's set up for when we come back one of the points that I have made often is that we homo sapiens. Sapien us, right you, and I have been here for about one hundred and fifty thousand years, and that we could push it back. Maybe another fifty thousand years, and the number would be around two hundred thousand years old on this planet and your book and the way that and Danielle's book the way that your evidence has been collected. Is that date is actually pushed back another six hundred thousand years, and it's tipping things over correct? Yes. That's right. It wasn't fair to say as well. You know, I'm I'm kinda chain. Changing what what was once considered? How most games because I mean, again, there's reasons why you say that, you know, the time I would have said now that we arise about two hundred thousand years ago. They even the mainstream is starting to change that date that having to push it back as well. Is they realized that that they they've had that wrong. They they haven't read understood, you know, what's made us the way we are. And and the different human ancestors that looked different how they feel today mixed, you know, so you might get some David quite like us, and they all they want. But then that group makes this discreet mix to and all about mixing as well, which is made us how we all said they also pushing back the the dates on the species. Now. Yeah. Which is the point that we just appeared here. Whether it's two hundred thousand years ago or eight hundred thousand years ago, there isn't the evolutionary steps that Darwin has suggested that would have taken tens of millions of years in front of homo sapiens. Sapien that we just appeared in there are reasons for that. We've got about ten seconds can..

Coming up next