President Trump, Planned Parenthood, Tony Van Pelt discussed on Buck Sexton
Announcement to make for all of you. You're getting advance. You're getting advanced word about this. But just in case you happen to be among those who have have enjoyed my, my time, crying to have a respectful conversation with the other side on hill TV. Next week is going to be my last week on hill TV I am. Going to be pursuing other projects as in focusing on this show and focusing on podcast. And some of the some of the things that many of you have been asking about ongoing to be leaving on very good terms, and I thank the management at the hill of for the opportunity, and for the, the investment in me, and, and it's been a very interesting year and a lot of growth, but last week or rather next week is gonna be my last week at hill, TV, so crystal and I are going to be sitting next to each other for about six more shows, and that's all she wrote on that one and look, I, I have nothing but, but fondness for my co host, and I as you know, I do not criticize my friends, and she has certainly a friend, I will say it is very challenging to do a left right show in the current environment. I mean, how do you have a how you have a civilized and fair-minded and worthwhile conversation about is the president? And a traitor, for example, which is a topic that the media forces Oeste cover because that's an allegation that Democrats will make and have made many times against the president. You know, how do you have a civil conversation about is Donald Trump insane legally mentally incompetent? Not not able to medically speaking whole the job of, how do you have a real conversation with someone about that with anyone about that? So I'm excited to have the, the license going forward. And this is going to be the way I conduct my all of this was an experiment to try to have the all right. Let's have a conversation that now I'm just going to have the buck conversation as in this is what I think about all of the things, here's the people need to know if they want to have an exchange of ideas with me, that's fine. But I reserve the right to say that the other side's ideas are stupid, including two anyone's face, and anyone who does not want to have that conversation with me after I'm done at the hill, should not talk to me from the other side doesn't mean are always say that doesn't mean I'm not willing to have a civil conversation just means I reserve the right to be able to say that is some dumb ass stuff. So that would be a bit of a change for me. Obviously you're on radio. I can say whatever I want, which is great and always have and always will, but going forward. I will not commit. I told you this at the hill, I committed to trying to have a both sides of the aisle conversation. It was challenging I learned a lot. I am not doing that again. That's, that's not that's not in my future. Folks, that's not happening. So I can tell you that if that explained feel about it. Well, then there we go. But I did get the chance because it would have been over the last year, some of my favorite stuff that I've been able to do has involved speaking to particularly are some of the left wing. Guests that I've, I've had some spirited exchanges within, you know, today, I wasn't really in a of this. Well, you tell you what's really going on here. I, I didn't get much sleep last night. So I wasn't full of full of zest and energy this morning. But we had on a think, either national spokesperson, or a president or something very senior person from the national organization of women. Now name is Tony than pelt, and she came on the show, and she would net look people ask me sometimes buck, why wouldn't you have on more liberals on your radio show that won't come on here? They'll get they know what's going to happen, especially if they want to have a productive conversation and respectful conversation. That's fine. But they don't they want to go into talking points, and they want to, they want to engage in the kind of intellectual laziness and emotional blackmail, that are central to left wing argument. That's, that's what you get on so many of these different issues. So they won't they won't do it, and I won't waste my time with them even if they would do it in most cases, not in all cases. But MS van pelt was talking about these. Recent decisions from the supreme core involving the abortion law in Indiana. And I just want you to note I'm being very calm, because she knows you know, it's like when the head of Planned Parenthood who recently got four Pinocchio for being a lighter and lying's, the head of Planned Parenthood. I can't remember name now Dr something or other. She said that foulland's of women die from used to die from abortions. That's not true. That's just a lie. That the abortion lobby keeps saying, thousands of women, a year you should abortion, is not true. All they believe it might have been like a dozen a year. Something like that. But they say a thousand a year, that's that's not accurate. She lied, but they had identified me, and this is a frustration that I had at the hill because much of much of the hill TV. Staff were very liberal, and I am not liberal. So as you know. So there was always a little bit of a, a little bit of a disconnect in this regard. But they were informed that I was considered an enemy of choice by Planned Parenthood, which is something that I wear as a badge of honor, and I should probably get a t shirt that says enemy of choice, although wouldn't be clear to everybody. What choice of an enemy of? But anyway, Tony van pelt knows that I'm not on. I'm not on her team. So she sits down and launches. Right of this, the national organization for women far left group. All, you know, think of progressive women's issue, and they're all over it. And here's how some of the conversation went policies for me, not having more energy play clip thirteen. I'm very sad by this. And I'm and of course upset and many women in the country are very angry, by the fact that these men have made this decision about their bodily integrity when it's really none of their business, but wasn't just who weighed in on this, it was a seven two decision and a couple of liberals actually went along with it. So we'll why you're saying just because it is driven by men. I'm I'm uncertain as to what you're talking about. But it is an undue burden on women's Kagan joined the majority of it is, when somebody say, man, I mean, my understanding is that Kagan joined the majority here. She's, obviously a woman. Yeah. Thank you for bringing up that point. Yeah. It wasn't just men. A woman went with the majority here saying that, yeah, they can dispose the state can say you have to dispose of this, as you would human remains because that's what it is human remains to human being. But, but notice that, that, you know, that this sort of snide. Yeah. What she said was stupid and I just I didn't call it stupid. I just made it obvious that it's stupid by saying that, you know, you're saying that the men made this decision, but it wasn't just mad a woman made this decision to and to liberals went along with the conservatives on the court here. So why go with the why go with the nonsense talking point? But let's, let's dig a little deeper into the nonsense talking points. Your play. Fourteen. Why should the gender of the Justice matter in these cases, why should the gender of the Justice in this particular case, we're talking about particular men that hold these views and that's why it would matter. What about the fact that in Roe v? Wade, all of the majority were men does that then affect their ability to weigh in an impartial and fair manner. You're not here and we're not talking about that, now we're talking a principal as to why is the gender of the Justice should matter. I really don't see that as an important to this to this discussion because what we're talking about is women. We're not talking about men except in the way that men tried to control women, and that's why the first thing your seven you sat down this decision by a bunch of men, so okay? Okay. Said that it is men who are trying to control women. That's why it's so important that we put more women onto the state legislatures. Notice. How she she spits out there? You know, men are the ones pushing this decision as if they're allowed to push decisions about women's bodies, and all I say, this is very straightforward. I mean she's obviously a truly brainwashed. Left-wing pro-abortion automaton. All I say or is okay. We'll Roe v. Wade was all men all of the majority in review. White men does does that mean that, you know, when men do what you want them to do. They have full agency, full license on the court to weigh in on women's bodies, and what they can and can't you when they don't do it there, men. They're not allowed to I think she's just not clever enough to understand what I was trying to explain to her. It's not it's actually not complicated producer, Mike. She the president of the national organization for women. I think she's something other that or the national spokesperson for yes, he's the president. The president of the national organization for women folks. Not not impressive. Not smart. Let's just say it not somebody who under. And I think that it's, it's not that she's a dumb person per percents arguments are dumb her understanding. These, you is dumbed down because it has to be because otherwise it falls into contradiction. That's why she she's a little brainwashed soldier of sorts for her side, who is told to just go and, and attack the other side, and she's not told why or Howard anything else. You just knows that this is for women and abortion, is a right. And. Doesn't think beyond that and then just one more question just to give you a sense of what v other side with the Democrats really want here. This is what I asked the president of the national organization for women play fifteen should abortions be directly subsidized by taxpayers that all health care should not be subsidized that is universal right. For people that's my tax dollars should go toward abortions. Which you believe part of health health care, birth control sex education abortion. Classic abortion lobby maneuver there. You notice when I asked her is very straightforward. Yes or no question should tax dollars go toward abortion. She says, you know, well all healthcare is a yeah. So is that a yes or no? Well, let's talk about all this other this is what this is what Planned Parenthood does. Oh, we're all about nanograms and giving out birth control and also abortion. Why do you have to always talk about the other stuff? Why can't if abortion is fine. Want us talking about abortion..