New York Times, Special Counsel, Director discussed on Pat Gray Unleashed


I think you rely a lot on media and linked to know how many times you cited the Washington Post in your report how many times what signed it in post in your report. I do not have knowledge of that. You're but well I don't have to that figure. I counted about sixty times. How many times did you say New York Times? I counted no idea Ni- candidate about seventy five times. How many times did you cite Fox News? The other two annoyed about twenty five times. I've got to say it looks like volume. Two is mostly regurgitated press stories. Honestly there's almost nothing in volume to that. I couldn't already here or no or simply by having a fifty dollar cable news subscription. That's fascinating point. He's just regurgitate regurgitating news stories in his report and we paid forty million million dollars for that report to mess when again that to mess we could all listen to the news reports or on television and read them for ourselves in the New York Times and wherever else they're published. We can do that on our own. We don't need a forty million dollars investigation to do that. Meanwhile representative John Ratcliffe. WHO's a former prosecutor he he also brought some heat showed everybody watching what a disgrace the whole investigation was check this out very first line of your report? The very first line of your report says as you read this morning it authorizes special counsel missile to provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the Prosecution or declaration decisions reached by the special counsel. That's the very first word of your report right correct. Here's the problem director. The special council didn't do that on volume one. You did on volume two with respect to potential of obstruction of justice. The special counsel made neither a prosecution decision or a declaration decision. You made no decision you told us this morning and in your report that you made no determination so respectfully director. You didn't follow the special counsel regulations. It clearly says right a confidential report about decisions reached nowhere in in here. Does it say right a report about decisions that weren't reached. You wrote one hundred eighty pages one hundred eighty pages about decisions that weren't reached about potential crimes that weren't charged or decided and respectfully respectfully respectfully by doing that you manage to violate every principal and the most sacred of traditions about prosecutors not offering extra prosecutorial analysis about potential crimes that aren't charged so aw Americans need to know this as they listen to the Democrats and Socialists on the other side of the aisle as they do dramatic readings from this report that volume two of this report was not authorized under the law to be written. It was written to a legal standard that does not exist at the Justice Department and it was written in violation of Every D._O._J.. Principle about extra prosecutorial commentary I agree with the chairman this morning when he said Donald Trump is not above the law he's not but he dam sure shouldn't be below the law which we're volume two of this report puts him good stuff wow that she's that is summed up nicely by Radcliffe Their Hashtag put that in your pipe yeah he really laid it down. That was a tremendous explanation. About what a fiasco this is Ben. Where do you go with that or what? What is Muller even say to that? There's nothing against say to that probably says. Can you please repeat. That's what he says long there. I I'm sorry just the last part of it. What was that just just well the first in the last part if you could just repeat the first part in the last part and the middle if you could just do the first part first and then do the last part and then repeat what you set in the middle?.

Coming up next