must be some profit involved in it at some point. Yup. Seed the distinction between social business and gunman Schoenberg's news. The whole businesses created to make money personally, the more money I make Bush successful business AM so objective of the businesses, making money making profit. We changed objective clause with a purpose of the social business is to solve problems. So southerly from profit making We become problem-solving companies And what happens to the prophet company makes profit, But owners don't want to take this profit personality. It's ploughed back into the best as because it is a selfless business. I'm not personally benefiting from the company where 100 percent of the benefit of the business In the conventional business comes to the owner in selfless business. Nothing comes to the owner. Everything goes to the people for whom this business has created, an recreated businesses of healthcare businesses over environmental degradation, waste management. And so these are all created to solve the problem, how to bring solar energy in their homes in the villages of Bangladesh, we ever company. Solar energy company in Bangladesh, which has now nearly two million households delivering solar energy in household level As a business proposition, but are the social business, but he's not to make money, but to sustain itself, get the money back so that you're going to plough back the money and continue to work. Unlike charity organization, We could have done it is a charity organisation than the money will garner out. It will never come back to us. That's the charity was hidden out. Once you get the money out in with Ben, You can bring it back. Then it becomes very powerful. Charity money has only one life. It goes out in its done, finish. It never come back to the picture again. If you do it in the social business way than the money goes out, does though work can come back and then it you. We use it again and again and again and again, So it's a endless life for this social business money that is the power of the social business. And we say, what the social business is a business. But with the objective up a charity. You take the objective of champion and put a business engine magnet, and second. Lead because it for business in charity, You don't want to benefit personally. Similarly, You don't want to benefit personally from the Socialist, but the money circulates and many continues to work investor can take back the investment money. This is ma'am a negative backed by you on the company, but the remaining profit, All this blood back and you can grow. You can expand any. This ideas is spreading many, many countries. Now, We are very happy at Saint. Tell me that the main premise behind a world of 300 The premises. I see a very strong one. The whole world today is creating enormous wealth concentration. All the wealth goes to fewer and fewer hands. If you look globally, the descended information from oxygen is eight people in the world on more wealth than the bottom. Fifty percent of the population of the narrow. You can imagine what's happening. And that number eight was not number eight a couple of years back this more than eight. Now, Chris quiz two eight next year older You're next. It'll be one percent will be owning more wealth than the bottom fifty percent of people. So this this speed in which wealth concentration is going on. And I tried to explain by saying core big mushroom on the top, which is the wealth of the oil door, But owned by fewer fewer hands. And that mushroom is growing faster and faster. Number of owners becoming smaller and smaller. This stem which hangs from the mushroom becoming Tina and Tina. Because that was becomes smaller and smaller, but that is the worst which belongs to ninety nine point nine percent of the population of been there will so live in ninety nine point. Nine percent of the world population gets his fewer feared wealth, if fiction of the wealth of the world an entire world. And I said, this is totally unsustainable. It is not really Konomi. It is mockery of economy when you have all the wealth demands of people. And this is a terrible thing which will explored assists a ticking time bomb political-economic. It will explode very soon. So unless we become conscious and pay attention How to stop that it was the explosion. And then make sure dwelt comes back to the people how to do that said I said, yes. What are the procedure to do that? If we do this social business with doesn't go into the fewer And because in social business Dougherty takes money for themselves. So no contribution to the world consultation. Then I put another point, which is a flaw in a conventional economic theory. The capitalist teary. The expect. All human beings to work for somebody else. I said this is put at an Celtic to human being, why anybody should work for anybody else. Human beings is complete by himself and herself. Their independent person. The are created person. They're do-gooders that our history all throughout the history. We were problem solvers. We are go getter as we are a farmers. We did our own thing, but certainly when he come to the formal economy of the new world because of the purely that you made, We are asked, No, no, You have to work for somebody. So we prepare our children to get ready to work or somebody else. Nice. It's a shame. Why don't you tell our children look, you have two options. I did. You can work for somebody. All you can get into premium. You're born as an independent financial, find your way out, and all people can become an entrepreneur. So now we are promoting that all human beings under premier That's have been to punish should. And I also remind artificial intelligence is coming. You cannot assisted solely there. And out with artificial intelligence drivers will be. On taxes will be running around with no driver. All the truck sit around the world would be without any driver and many other vehicles who Granny without any driver factories will be running without any people. You'll have 10,000 people working in effect three. Now your ten people working in the same factor because artificial-intelligence who Hutu than all the people who losing their jobs as it. Have you ever imagine what kind of while it would be which is coming in ten to fifteen years? What kind of life it will be that we the people sitting around doing nothing and artificial intelligence is ending the economy. So these are unemployed people at the mercy of the charity of the government to give them a welfare payment. And so one I said, That's not an economy that should be looking forward to. Technology is a good idea. We support technology because that's what changes are low. But technology has to have some limitations to give the example of medicine pharmaceutical companies wind up, develop a medicine of hard work, whatever disease you have. You develop. Madison spend lots of years in Knepper privy to designed that particular medicine. Then you have to go to the gunman regulators, The people who want to approved in, disapprove your medicine, They will go to another test. And the thing that finally got approval or disapproval. I said there is no through wounded approval process in technology. You can destroy the whole world with your technology, but nobody's watching nobodies giving you permission whether you could use it as his very important time right now to come up with this idea that you onto started. If you have developed the technology first, you have to get to approval who there is harmless people. Every Tom's people like the medicine, we don't allow you to move it end this artificial intelligence. We take you a job. This is a great case where government permission. And so one has to be approval as to get approval process so that they cannot go and take away people job. So I sit in any case we have to become entrepreneurs because that's what we are. If you become, entrepreneurs will be hiring artificial intelligence for working for us the other day. The replacing us. So this is one direction that we have to think about. And of course, the big strand is all about carbon emissions. Guest desert, two-thirds Zillow, poverty, zero unemployment Neckermann emission. Yes, This is very important. We will bring up Dole world by, uh, a not listening to that, not a approving that luckily police agreement came. It took lots of yet more than forty years. So hard were pursuing the government pressurising the government civil society any around to make sure that we will understood deep Imagine of of the situation. And before we get to the point of no-return so that we can make decisions, stopped global warming and predict the plan. And that's what the Paris Agreement came and incomes Trump Then comes withdrawal of Trump again, a very negative thing. And as a kind of unusual thing where we are will all unified to protect the planet with Dupree's agreements. When at the same time we have nuclear bombs, nuclear weapons stockpiles of twenty three thousand warheads waiting to be blown out. Anytime you one and you can be by design with your suspect, If somebody's going to take your Do you want to attack before then? Else, debt Accu. It could be excellent. And you destroy the whole planet. So you're trying to protect the planet and the same time you're moving around and widow promotion of the nuclear weapons. USA recently made a decision to defraud wish there were stockpiled that the have a because it's all stockpile The two Couple up trillion dollars just to defer wish the stucco it as it. This insanity next to it. That the you do such kind of thing as it. We have to protect ourselves from next team nature of our thing that we get involved. Why do we have to blow up the world to protect our So what does it mean? So anyway, This is the danger of the planet. And luckily we have this basically Melissa stay with the IRS agreement and we make sure nuclear weapons bluepints of mass destruction cannot continue. It comes to zero level. So this is something we on at the same time is not just protecting the planet in just not for the global warming protecting the planet from the crazy people. Who want to blow it up? These are all fantastic ideas and the proven must to work so far. But yet as you point out, You have somebody completely crazy extensively in charge of the free world who has rejected the Paris climate agreement, who is out to now to capitalist who is in it for the wealth creation of the few and not of the many. So can these wonderful ideas actually work in a world where this is our reality ultimately, whatever go back to answer that question is said, It all depends on you and me us. What is it that we have inside to us? Do you want to protect Then will protect the sisters politicians who are want to destroy them. This is stores businesses who onto consulted, the blended Adams, who won. They cannot consented their world. If I become an interpreter because I'm not working for him anymore. If I don't work for him there no way, he can get to do this world confontation. So I pick up that will put myself and they're the billions of people who are picking up their world because we are all interpreters. Is working for him or her to consolidate all the wealth of the world into fewer and fewer hands. I said about the empty nine point nine percent of the people having tiny, tiny fraction of wealth and only half a percent or less than half a percent will on the bulk of the west of the world. But if you look at the geographical distribution, All of these wealth is concentrated on probably half a dozen countries of the world. This of the world doesn't have anything. But in each of these countries, whatever the little they have, you'll see again ninety nine percent of that little have only controlled by few people. So you have the monopoly of economic power. And then monopoly of political power with the nuclear blueprint gives you a monopoly part because your voice has to be hard because they take you a trend. Some If you don't listen, I have the bomb, I can do anything I want. So people get the message. So you have the to monopolise working together desk, not a safe world. But we can make it safer more, we can make it what? Because that's what I'm saying that we have to express our So we have to tell our children Look, this is the future, and they have to understand that business is only not for making money. We can solve all the problems that we have around us. If we bring out key depowered intake, our beat out of the picture. This whole thing is the seed of great blunted by the capitalist system. That CDs one which has blown up into this proportion to They were talking about the Wisconsin tissue. Professing Yunus Thank you so much. Professor Mohammad Yunus has written a world of three zero s He is of course a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize. The book looks at the new economics of zero poverty, their unemployment and Sierra carbon emissions. It's published by scribe. It's out now. You could listening to meet the releases. Thanks to the production team of two Smetana and Daphne Connie's researcher was clearly Connie's. You can download this show and previous episodes Mall website up from SoundCloud mix cloud or I chains. I'm Georgina Godwin. Thank you.