President Trump, Franklin Roosevelt, New York Times discussed on Mark Levin

Automatic TRANSCRIPT

Eight seven seven three eight one three one one eight seven seven three eight one three eight one one. President wants to secure the border. You know, a couple of months ago. The media and the Democrats won in the same. Had a mantra they always have a new mantra. They had a mantra about. You know, the separation of children from parents. People coming across the border legally. And they said that Trump had created what are effectively interment camps. Interment camps. Of course, he created no such thing. I don't need to go through a list with you again. But it was actually Franklin Roosevelt who created internment camps. And he signed a military order directing that one hundred twenty thousand. Japanese Americans and Americans of Japanese descent where to be removed from their homes. And moved into these camps. Placed in Arizona, summer placed. Elsewhere they were to be moved off the west coast. I want you to know some history. It's all very important because FDR is one of the favourite presidents of the left and the tenured historians who are professors. Usually is Washington Lincoln Lincoln, Washington. And of course, FDR sometimes they put after your first because he was the great progress. One day. It will be Obama. FDR was a racist. I'm not saying that to be provocative. An excellent book written on this subject put out by Harvard gentleman by the name of Robinson by order of the president. Spend a lot of time reading history. And. He issued the order. The near time soda was really kind of cool. Here's the headline from the New York Times. March twenty four thousand nine hundred forty two Japanese begin evacuation trek I caravan. They liked the word caravan of three hundred and fifty cars with one thousand leaves Los Angeles for Owens river valley. Listen to this sub headline good humor prevails. Government announced plans for colonization of twenty thousand in Arizona Indian reserve. This democrat party is amazing, isn't it? Now, that's not that long ago. Nineteen forty two. So I've been reading this book been reading scores of books over the last several weeks. As I do my research. And they point this out does Robinson. This book is not a new book. He comes from the Harvard University press of must be good, right? It's first copyright. Let's see here. I believe is a nineteen sixty six. Let me read you this. Too closely interrelated elements stand out strongly is determinative in the president's decision and his subsequent actions. One of these was undoubtedly Roosevelt's own negative beliefs about Japanese Americans. While the other was a failure political Amara leadership that resulted from weakness in his presidential style and administrative organization. FDR's hostile attitude towards Japanese Americans had deep roots in his past has early nineteen thirteen when legal discrimination against Japanese aliens in California, brought Japan and the United States close to war the young FDR at the outset of his career in public service began to regard, both the the ICM migrants and American born that is the original immigrants from Japan and they're American born Nicey children. That's what they call them as a menace. A foreign and racially and racial population. They couldn't be assimilated whose presence was a source of both chronic irritation to their white American neighbors, I'm quoting and conflict with Japan. During the nineteen twenties. Even as FDR praised the Japanese government and called for closer relations between the two countries he publicly opposed any further immigration of the Japanese into the United States, he justified discriminatory legislation against Japanese aliens on the west coast. So means of preserving white, racial purity. This has been the history of the democrat party slavery. Segregation, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt. Yes. I know. I'm I'm I'm telling you the truth. You don't hear these things? A low FDR did not consider people of Japanese ancestry racially inferior in his few. They were a biologically distinct. People who are in innately incapable of adapting to American society are becoming true Americans. This is your democrat party. This is your great FDR. He argued that they needed to be kept apart. He considered anti-japanese natives sentiment reasonable and just. The president's inability. This goes to immigration, his inability to conceive of people of Japanese ancestry as true Americans contributed to intervene to protect their liberty and property rights in the face of public hysteria. They're talking about after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Though, he realized the Nicey where United States citizens Roosevelt was unwilling to recognize that they had the same inalienable rights to do process and equal protection of the laws as other citizens. And. The media. Our free press freedom of the press, the vanguard of one hundred and twelve thousand Japanese aliens with American born an American born a must've vacuous the west coast combat zone rolled up the Owens valley Bhai motor convoy this evening to temporary new homes. I five hundred to arrive weary, but gripped with the spirit of adventure. Over a new pioneering chapter in American history. Drove the two hundred thirty miles from the outskirts of Los Angeles in their own cars pace by highway patrolman and army jeeps. A similar number came by train to the loan pike where buses and trucks met them to carry the evacuees and their possessions, the last ten miles to a new reception centre rising as if by magic at the foot of snowcapped peaks wasn't that sound good. Mr. Mr. producer. By Lawrence Davies of the New York Times. March twenty three nineteen forty two actually March twenty three thousand nine hundred forty two goes on. What I'm trying to get at here is what the president is proposing. The border is very mild medicine, ladies and gentlemen. He's not discriminating against a single human being. Let alone a race of people. He wants to secure the border, he talks about legal immigration. He talks about giving members of the DACA group amnesty. But the Democrats won't agree. You gotta watch the Democrats and their motives, very, very carefully. You have to ignore the the spin and their static you have to the media propaganda on their behalf. You've got to think about what is motivating. And it's been revealed. What's motivating them power? Power. If seventy five percent of the Latino population voted Republican, they'd be building walls and moats they'd be putting a fifty caliber machine guns on the border. They would do whatever they add to do to keep people out because that's what they do. And when seventy five percent of Latinos, vote democrat, no wall. No fence open borders. And entice people with sanctuary city, sanctuary states free healthcare in New York City free healthcare urine. And there no matter whether bankruptcy city or a state destroys your tax base destroys property rights. And all it doesn't matter. The primary importance is the democrat party, and and the power of those elites, and you may be shaking your head. That can't be look all over the world. Why is Venezuela? The way it is to help the people know. Keep in power, the people who are in charge China Russia. America. In many ways is is is one of the few exceptions, ladies and gentlemen. So it is a battle between liberty and tyranny is a battle between constitutionalism and progressivism. But the bottom line is they are statists and we are constitutionalists. The media basically supported what Franklin Roosevelt was doing. It is abuse of Japanese Americans. In his internment camps. The United States Supreme court upheld it. An infamous decision. The core Matsu decision it upheld. It. This president wants to secure the border. He's being blocked by part of the house of representatives. He's being blamed for a government shutdown the media, call them a liar. Call him worse than that. He's got limited options. He's the president. He's responsible for the border alternately. He's responsible for the executive branch, which is the administrative state. He's a lot arguments. He could make about needing to trigger the national emergencies act how because he's a dictator not because he's Hitler. Every president before him hundred seventy six Ford has used that act for one reason or another. And he can trigger it and he triggered by using the immigration and naturalization act. And there's a section of that act. That's that talks about what an emergency is. And it very clearly defines what he's talking about. And that's why you hear the Democrats saying this is manufactured manufactured manufacturing because the trying to stay two steps ahead of him. If he doesn't fact triggered the national emergencies at that, they say he manufactured this. So whatever they can do to tear him down, and quite frankly to tear the country down is fine by them. The only crisis. They ever see is one that involves redistributing wealth. Redistributing wealth, the New York Times, and then almost the rest of the American media thought, the internment of Japanese Americans was a swell thing. Was a swell thing. And they lecture us. Where are the fact checkers coming from the New York Times? All the news that's fit the rap fishing as I've said many many times. So for the New York Times, the internment of Japanese Americans and Americans are Japanese descent forcibly removing them from their homes taking their private property away wasn't adventure. A pioneering adventure. And the the article is accompanied by I'm looking at right now a photo showing smiling. Japanese. Boarding the train. Because the New York Times. Was a mouthpiece. For Franklin Roosevelt. And much of the rest of the media were to. And this is what happens. When you have an ideologically driven one party media. Tyranny. Tyranny. And that's pretty much what we have today. I'll be right.

Coming up next