Thirty Four Year, Five Minutes, Eight G discussed on Larry Elder


We have a country to say that now call for the board down there all are are a in the late nineteen one S. eight G. triple eight nine seven one seven four three friends at this point does it make speaking of what needs to one of the Republicans who was questioning Robert Muller yesterday yes Kelly Armstrong Republicans North Dakota this is a guy sitting next to you the one you brought Erin not simply he represented Justin Cooper that the Clinton aide who destroyed one of Clinton's mobile devices and Mahler goes out about it now Erin deeply is the guy brought with them and he's a cyber security expert in an attorney he represented Clinton aide named Justin Cooper from twenty fifteen to twenty sixteen according to PJ media and Cooper quote played a key role in setting up and managing Hillary Clinton's private email server specifically he bought Clinton server registered the Clinton mail dot com domain to help set up Hillary Clinton's mobile communications in the photo FBI records reveal Cooper did recall two instances where he destroyed Clinton's old mobile devices by breaking them in half or hitting them with a hammer close quote so this is the lawyer that Mahler actually brought with him to the hearing before the house Judiciary Committee I like to director attention to that got that next to you Aaron simply in the the guy that represented Justin Cooper the Clinton aide who set up the the server and help to destroy those emails that were under subpoena Rachel Maddow now you can't she lost five hundred thousand viewers when the mother report came out because they expected collusion corruption conspiracy didn't get it you can't dislike truck more then Rachel Matt out just like trump she's on MSNBC ha something I watched you don't have to answer this over the course of the two hearings today as the hours stitched together and as Robert Muller I don't think increasingly but persistently seems he seemed like he was district did you three old she did say old who he seemed like he was struggling at times to hear what was going on he told you he didn't want to be there did you listen to what he said in may of twenty nineteen the man did not want to be there is what he said no I hope and expect this to be the only time that I will speak to you in this matter I am making that decision myself no one has told me whether I can or should testify in other words it started out in good faith and I realize it went along and I heard the critics and I realize conflicts of interest and double standards in math applications of the law and sorrow to report now I want to get out of here I'm I'm we're speak further about this matter there's been discussion about an appearance before Congress any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report it contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made we chose those words carefully and the work speaks for itself and the report is my testimony I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress in addition access to our under the underlying work product is being decided in a process that does not does not involve our office so beyond what I've said here today and what is contained in our written work I do not believe it is appropriate for me to speak further about the investigation or to comment on the actions of the justice department or Congress that's what Robert Miller said in may of this year and I bet you those Democrats wish they had listened Gerry is in Dallas Texas on the Larry on the show thank you so much for calling appreciate it I just wanted to call up in console you because I know you must have been so devastated by listening to Mahler because it's obvious he never listens to your show although I might make one comment and that is what the Democrats didn't realize if Mahler anything that they wanted to wanted him to say he was going to put himself in a perjury trap and he was at least Mart enough to not do that well absolutely Gerry thank you very much for calling look he struggled on the basic things the man did not write that report I think the guy that wrote the report the same guy that wrote about his first book I'm working on here is mall or the representative Brad winds dropped a Republican from Ohio he was a German thank you Mister mall for being here today this law is it accurate to say your investigation found no evidence of members of the trump campaign were involved in the theft or publication of Clinton campaign related emails yeah I can you read or can you repeat the question is it accurate to say your investigation found no evidence that members of the trump campaign were involved in the theft or publication of the Clinton campaign related emails I don't know I don't know what Dave well well volume one page five the investigation did not establish that members of the trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities so it would therefore be inaccurate based on this to describe that finding as open to doubt that finding being good that trump campaign was involved with after publication of the Clinton campaign emails the following that believe I'm following it but it is that portion of that matter it does not fall within our jurisdiction or I I or and have a fall within our this will be C. which is what you eat I was painful back to John Ratcliffe Republican from Texas can you give me an example other than Donald Trump or the justice department to determine that in investigated person was not exonerated because innocence was not conclusively determined I cannot but this evening okay well you can't time is short I've got five minutes let's just leave it you can't find it because I'll tell you why it doesn't exist the special counsel's job nowhere does it say that you were to conclusively determine Donald trump's innocence or that the special counsel report should determine whether or not to exonerate him it's not in any of the documents is not in your appointment order it's not in special counsel regulations is not in the O. L. C. opinions is not the justice manual and it's not the principles of federal prosecution nowhere to those words appear together because respectfully respectfully director it was not the special counsel's job to conclusively determine Donald trump's innocence or to exonerate him because the bedrock principle of our justice system is a presumption of innocence it exists for everyone everyone is entitled to it including sitting presidents and because there is a presumption of innocence prosecutors never ever need to conclusively determine if a question is file helm way you lying then are you lying now are you not in fact a chronic and habitual here's what you can set about really factor I've been using really factor for a little bit over a month but the thirty four year old woman that has been in a car accident I suffered from severe neck pain shooting pain down my arms and legs that would often caused me to land at one point I was going to a chiropractor and acupuncturists six times.

Coming up next