Adolf Hitler, Germany, Candice Owens discussed on Red Eye Radio

Automatic TRANSCRIPT

Mailed patriarch he'll pension end injustice. Red Eye Radio. Covers everything they're pretty much. He's Eric Harley. I'm Gary McNamara high. All right. Let's get right to it. I want to play this from the House Judiciary committee hearing on hate online white nationalism online. And this is after Candice Olin made her opening remarks and then Ted lieu plays. Just a thirty second. Recording of what he says is the statement that she made about Adolf Hitler that appeared to be complimentary. Right. Okay. All right. So here we go on this, right? In congressional hearings. The minority party gets a select it's own witnesses and all the people that Republicans could have selected they pick Candice Owens. I don't know miss Owens. I'm not gonna characterize her. I'm going to let her own words to the talking. I'm gonna play for you, the first thirty seconds of a statement you made about Adolf Hitler. Plan from cell phone. All right. I actually don't have any problems at all of with the work nationalism. I think that it gets a definition gets poisoned by a leader had actually want globalism vocalism is what I what I don't want. So when you think about whenever we say nationals in the first thing people think about in Elvis in America's Hitler. He was a national socialist. But if Hitler just wanted to make Germany, Great and half things run. Well, okay. Autumn is is that he wanted. He had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize what everybody German, everybody Germano. So my first question is to Mr. Chenoweth. This Owens said quote, if Hitler just wanted to make Germany, Great and a half things run. Well, okay, fine. The problem is that he wanted. He had dreams outside of Germany. So when people try to legitimise Adolf Hitler does that feed into white nationalist ideology? It does Mr. Lou, I know that miss Owens distanced herself from those comments later, but we express great concern over the original comments. Great. Thank you. Thank you, MS Owen. I'm sorry. We started recording. Would you like to respond to that? Yes. I think it's pretty apparent that? Mr Liu believes that black people are stupid and will not pursue the full clip in its entirety. He purposely presented an xtrac Vic strategy lip suspend for a moment. It is not proper to refer disparagingly to a member of the committee. The witness will not do that again witnessed may continue. Sure. Even though I was called despicable rudeness may not refer to a member of the committee stupid. I didn't refer to him as stupid. That's what I said. It's not what I said at all. You didn't listen to what I said. Continue. As I said, he is assuming that black people will not go pursue the full to our clip, and he purposefully extracted he cut off, and you didn't hear the question that was asked of me he's trying to present. As if I was launching a defensive Hitler in Germany, when in fact, the question that was asked of me was returning to whether or not I believe that Hitler was whether or not I believed in nationalism and nationalism was bad. When I responded to was I do not believe that we should be characterizing Hitler as a nationalist. He was a homicidal psychopathic maniac that killed his own people. A nationalist would not kill their own people. That is exactly what I was afraid to in the clip. And he purposely wanted to give you a cut up similar to what they do to Donald Trump to create a different narrative that was unbelievably dishonest, and he did not allow me to respond to it, which is worrisome to tell you a lot about where people are today in terms of trying to drum up narratives, by the way. I would like to also add that I worked for Prager university, which is run by orthodox Jew on a single democrat showed up to the embassy opening Jerusalem. I sat on a plane for. Eighteen hours to make sure that I was there. I'm deeply offended by the insinuation of of revealing that clip without the question that was asked of me. There you go. And lose just sitting there not making any money just dead and Nadler, did you hear in the background? I don't know if you could hear, but I've I've listened to the cut and seeing the cut whoever's next one's telling him she didn't say that. She didn't set up. She didn't attack anybody. She she didn't call anybody on that panels. Right. He not even paying attention. Two two major hits at once. That's gotta hurt. But again, the left can't help them. Ted lose a lightweight. It liberals are complete total lightweights today. They can't defend they cannot handle cross examination in any way. No, no. They they lie. They have today. Cherry pick comments in order to make them seem like something. They're not. It's exactly what the media does. She made makes the great point because it just happened to Trump last weekend. Again, were they brought up something that was eleven months old. That have already been debunked. And you had let me see. But a judge jumped on it. Right. President who else jumped on it. We went through the list she other day, and there were few of the other presidential candidates that also jumped on him like what are you doing that was that was debunked? You don't it's getting to be like I had to do that on Facebook the other day too. I do it on Facebook constantly on the memes. My friends posted stop the person never said that right? You know, the the one the one I debunked again yesterday was the one with Kurt cobaine predicting the Donald Trump will be president anytime seen that never happened stopped hosting the damn thing. Right. And and it's whenever you see these memes out there of people just like they're like never happened. Never happened never happened. And that's basically what the Democrats have now become they become fake names. Well because. One thing to have a narrative based on any kind of falsehood. Right. Where you start on the false premise, and then you keep going, and again, as I've said, you when you start on a false premise, everything that follows seems logical because of that false premise, but you have to remember that it's all false based on the premise, which is false. That's that's the tactic of yesterday. The straw, man argument. The the creating of of of scenarios or situations or even people examples. That never happened. That's still goes on somewhat. But now it is it really is just like creating a fake name and throwing it up there. And you're going to get share after share after share after share because people want to believe these things. So they they look I believe what I believe. But the last thing I want to do is jump on something completely and wholly without knowing.

Coming up next