Russia, CNN, FBI discussed on Rush Limbaugh


Also had some other signs that maybe something was going on this angle the Roger stoning. So we showed up at his house this morning. We were the only ones there and lo and behold, the FBI agents did Kona arrest them imagine that lo and behold. Yeah, something was having a Thursday that normally happens Friday, so. We're the only ones that showed up and then when the FBI shows up they didn't kick the media out. They welcomed him. I wonder if ahead box of doughnuts and coffee for them. The FBI had doughnuts and coffee for and was it the other way around it CNN bring coffee and donuts for the FBI. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. We showed up in. They're the only ones there the FBI agents say they came and arrested him, and that was really really cool. Allison. The Russia investigation big news in the Russia investigation. This isn't a Russia investigation. And it has been for over a year now later on CNN. They calmed down. Just a little bit John Berman. This is later talking to the author Garrett Graff. Groff about the arrest of Roger stone Berman says, so what are your thoughts now on all of this? It's hard to know at this exact moment is whether this is all that Muller has on Roger stone. Or is this the beginning because it is notably an indictment that's focused only on really those false statements in that obstruction. And it doesn't get into some of those charges that we would expect to see like conspiracy against the United States or campaign finance violations that could point to those larger questions of collusion. So the question is is that still to come? Let me translate. So this guy Garrett Graff looked at the hole. Where's the Russia's stuff in this? Where's the collusion stuff in this? Where is all a working with Russia? Steal the election. Where's that stuff in this? Well, it's not in there. And if this guy had his wits about him when he read the indictment. It would find out isn't going to be in there because the indictment pretty much acknowledges that there wasn't any collusion. Now CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin. Who is very much aware. What I just told you this is his spin on that. Yes. Actually, I think people will say this is yet another is term. I just heard process crime that it is lying to Mahler. But it is not the underlying offense of colluding with Russia. Now, you're not in great shape. If you are parsing, the kinds of crimes with which people in your campaign charged with, but I do think it is true that this is all under the rubric of obstruction rather than the underlying substantive crime. But what he's lying about may be the underlying crime Jeffrey, you've never heard of process crime. You're the legal analyst at CNN, and you've never heard the term process crime. I don't believe that. I think you're saying that simply as a means of deflecting its relevance and importance because I can't believe. That term has been used on your own network that terms been used since Martha Stewart everybody knows what a process cry is. You are the chief legal analyst. For CNN. This is a term. I just heard process crime that is it's lying Muller. But it's not the underlying offensive colluding with Russia. And then after some Gook, he says, yeah, I think it's true. This is all under the rubric of obstruction rather than the underlying substantive crime. Meaning collusion there isn't any. You know, the Muller knows. There isn't any Rosenstein knows Komi all these people in charge this investigation. No that there was no collusion with Russia. Now, the media folks, I can't begin to tell you because I I think these people are so poisoned with hatred that they are capable of believing. What they want to believe just like they get triggered by a make America great again hat. They look at a seventeen year old white teenager, lesean mortar read Trump had enabled conclude racist bigot hatemonger, and they will acknowledge this kid needs to be destroyed. Just because of the cap that he's wearing. So is it hard to believe that they've got all these sources they trust the leak and all this Bs for two years that Trump colluded with Russia? So I don't know I the idea that they are willing dupes in this is in possible be, but it's not they wouldn't just be willing dupes. They would be participating knowingly participating willful dupes. Because I'm gonna tell you this. If they know if Tuban these EMMY of them, if they know that this is all bogus. If they know what you, and I know that there was no Russian collusion, if they know that then they are every bit as guilty in participating this hawks. Participating in this oaks in perpetrating as the investigators are. And about that. I can I don't care what the truth is. I would not have trouble believing. They're either idiots and dunces or they are very much aware. What's going on and engaging in it? Anyway, let's take a brief timeout as we must have. We'll be back in continue. After the.

Coming up next