Oh, exactly. And if it wasn't for Mulvaney, the other Trump appointees is sad when you have to put an appointee to basically go in and just stop doing anything and agency for an agency to quit, you know, harming the American people. And the Biden administration has shown no desire to not harm American people in this regard because they have this, again, it is they don't like private contracts. They don't lock the free market system and Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and many other going back to Dodd Frank and everything else has just been hammering away at that for a long time. So John, from a perspective going forward, people we can look at it possibly this year, but definitely next term. In the meantime, we'll hopefully see things like the student loan program, the shown to be unconstitutional as I believe it is. We saw this last year. I hope that Roberts doesn't try to continue to keep this core in what I call a band aid mode. We saw that you made a little reference to it a little bit earlier with that previous ruling. You know, the concern I have with Roberts is and he's a conservative jurist, I get it on most business up. But when it comes to the big questions, he seems to be more of a, let's see if we can make this bad meal a little bit better by adding a milkshake to it or something because, you know, suddenly just needs to be scrapped and he seems to be more of one to put a band aid on. He thinks he's concerned about the legitimacy of the court, but so he thinks incremental staffs don't, you know, don't overturn presidents all at one time, but when there's a bad president, you know, wrongly decided, out of sync with the constitution, it is legitimate for the court to overturn it. And it's not certainly not stopping the attacks in the court when they go when they go Robert's way that doesn't certainly not sagging that he left this attack. So I don't think sometimes sometimes you have to, you know, it's the best thing in the long run just to rip the band aid off. Here's another panda analogy. Oh yeah. I wish that Roberts would focus more on the law. What does the law say? What does Congress roll with? What are those kind of things? Then again, and again, I'm being a little critical this morning I get it, but I mean, Roberts would have never, I don't think would have ever set up a judicial review. I mean, there's just so you go back to this, you know, from these big picture perspectives on how this actually works, but John, we're going to keep up with this. Thanks for your inside. People need to be aware that this is the fact that their credit cards are home mortgages, a car loan, and when we got inflation like it is, we got a fed this raising rates. We got all kinds of things going on. These become more and more pocketbook issues for everybody in America. John, thanks for joining me today, okay? Thank you so much for having me, Doug. CEI dot org is our website. Now, go to and you can find out all kinds of information on CEI dot org. They got lots of stuff. Great place to learn. I go there a lot to see what is being written. John's one of their leaders, that's why he's on this podcast a lot. We appreciate him being a part. Go to there and find out, also go to the duck calls podcast dot com. You can leave me an email if you have any more questions that we maybe could bring up in future episodes..