Jeffrey, Aleutian, National Academy Sciences discussed on Coast to Coast AM with George Noory


It's not supported by any scientific evidence. They just guess why is the topic Jeffrey so hot in heated? That's a perfect question. It is very hot in heated because what's happening. You know, as we open up in the beginning is you've got to conversations you've got one in front of the curtain one behind the curtain in front of the curtain is what students here in the classroom and in the the high school classrooms the university classroom. The other is what's going on behind the curtain. I just found and I didn't put this in my book on the internet. You can find a petition a scientific dissent from Darwinism. And it's on if you can find it on the internet, and it says we are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged and over five. Five hundred scientists have signed this thing it's at dissent from Darwin dot ORG. I don't have anything to do with this organization. Founded in fact, I wish I found it earlier. I would have put it in my book. But so what you've got is, you know, behind the curtain. You got a lot of scientists that are saying we don't really think this thing adds up and in chapter after chapter in my book, I lay out what these people what they're publishing I've got all kinds of evidence to share it comes from scientists. And that it's really it's really in bad shape in my right in a show me Jeffrey that if you believe in of Aleutian, you don't believe in the creator type theory, and if you believe in God, then you don't believe in evolution. Why can't there be a mix of both? Well, there there are. There's a continuing out there. And there there is a group of people who are pushing a theory called DS stick evolution. And so those would be people in the faith community who believe that you can resolve evolution. As being true. And and also that the bible is true, for example. But then they're highly criticized by by others in the faith community that they say, wow, you're just saying that God was a dummy created something then any walked away. So I don't really get in the middle of that argument. But I certainly do shine a light on science scientists themselves arguing with each other. 'cause that's a huge issue. And here's a here's another example, National Academy sciences. They wrote a book in two thousand eight I got it in front of me. You can you can download this for free as a PDF it's called science evolution and creationism. And in this book, basically, they're just pushing. Nursing evolution. As a fact Evelyn is a fact and will be true though, that Darwin also believed in God. That's a good question. Darwin was kind of. He was accused sort of Bev about guy. He really said as little as possible. I mean, he wasn't religious. No. But but I think he believed in some kind of alternate creator. Well, he did. And what's interesting is I've got a copy of Darwin's book right in my hand here on the origin of species, you can just walk into the bookstore and buy it and towards the back of the book Darwin's says to my mind it accords better with what we know. The laws impressed on matter by the creator the production and extinction of past and president inhabitants of the world should have been dude secondary causes. So he refers to the creator. And then he does it again. He does in the very last sentence of on the origin species. It just turn it last page, and he says, dares a grandparent. This view of life with its several powers having been originally breathed by the creator in a few forms or into one. So I mean, if Darwin stood in the university classroom and said. It'd be fired Jeffrey stay with.

Coming up next