IOT, United States, Larry discussed on Dentistry Uncensored with Howard Farran

Automatic TRANSCRIPT

They pay to have their whole system place with his just bromine, which is just basically the same family right underneath chlorine, fluorine bromine. And and it's amazing. How dine was intrigued. Curly, treat goiter, I salt. I mean, it's just an amazing on classification of elements. What what about people who would think? Well, I I'm allergic to shellfish. I can't have I dine. What would you say that person? Yes. Yes. So there there is this probably. Two or three main concerns about IOT dine one would be a shellfish allergy. And and that that's a pretty prevalent, but the shellfish allergy turns out to be a a sensitivity to a protein in the in the muscle of the shellfish. So so in the literature, the medical literature. It's replete with references now to that. This is not a an iodine allergy. It's a protein sensitization. So that's not an issue. This is also there's a concern with dine as to thyroid toxic city. And and we see this from time to time where with some of the research who has already shown that. The thyroid gland selectively uptakes I o die. It does not selectively uptake molecular I a- dine. So so thyroid toxic city is really not a concern because there's no greater when even if it was ingested, there's no greater concentration of molecular. Dine in the thyroid gland. As would be any other tissue of the body. But but our products are not intended for ingestion. So so that that's really of of limited concern, the the other concern that people have would be with this is in contrast media for imaging. And and the distinction here is that. Yes, it's true that that these are dying related contrast media. But the in the first instance, it's being injected into the directly into the vein. So you getting a shock to the system as a large bowl of fluid being injected into the vein. So the quantity of of of iodide, which is being delivered is fog greater, and it's also I o died. The second part is that it's also been found that there are excipient s- in the radio contrast media, and those excipient to which people are developing reaction to and these excipient s-, particularly those that have high asthma. Larry have have engendered the greatest reaction. So when they've subsidy it using the same amount of died substituting, the excipient. Low asthma liberty of excipient s-, they found that the reactions fell off dramatically. So so we this is having a reaction to some dine contrast media is not the same as having a reaction to particularly molecular. And and again, our products are not intended for ingestion. So this just topically apply. There is some absorption, but nowhere near where we get with ingestion. Also, there's been a. There had been a study which had been done on on over two thousand women in the United States on this was for the treatment of fiber cystic breasts disease, which is a precursor to breast cancer and molecular iodine tablets were used daily by these women for over two years. And there were there were no reportable adverse events in over two years and the amount of iodine that they were ingesting. I'm talking about molecular Adine out the amount to buy dine that they were ingesting is probably tend to fifty times as much as as what would be available in a bottle of of our product. If our product was to be drinking, which it's not. So you think the developing world, I don't like to call the third world that's kind of rude, but there's two hundred and thirty eight countries. Do you think where they have a problem with goiter that this door will form of dine molecular iodine would be treatment for goitre? It could be a treatment to quarter actually, it has much more profound because they were other things that could be used goiter. Did this actually has more profound use for third world countries in and then we're here we're straying outside of dentistry. But we're also again working with large corporate partners. We've looked at this an agriculture, and and the statisticians are are indicating that it's at the years from now there's not going to be enough food in the world to feed the world's population is just not going to be food. So so right now, the the produce the vegetables the fruits of beings produce at least forty percent, maybe forty five percent of all that produce is spoils..

Coming up next