Richard Ebright, Tony Foti, National Institute Of Health discussed on Mark Belling


I command you or Joe Biden mandate that you do that. If you if you are somebody who consumes more than 100 calories a day you must go and buy one of these certificates and, uh, go eat at the restaurants. I worked in the 100 there, Paul. I think I could think of other I mean, if you're only 900 calories a day you need to go to one of these two restaurants because you're you're wasting away. Folkie lied. People died folky lied. People died. Why has it? Why hasn't Tony folks have been fired? I mean, it's like it's a great question. Here's what we know. Or we can logically conclude about serc ov to its origins and the role of Tony Fauci, who is the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The A I. D. Now I add now I ate whatever. It doesn't have one of those little catchy acronyms. It's just it's just a jumbled mess. Sars-cov-2 is almost certainly we are. I mean, we don't have definitive 100% irrefutable proof, but certainly on the circumstances, circumstantial evidence. Sars-cov-2 is almost certainly created in a laboratory during a so you know, so called Gain of function research project. And that lab we are 99.99999% sure is the Wuhan Institute of Virology. And it was from that lab that we saw a patient zero in essence that were covid leaked. Somebody was infected at that lab and went out into the general population. And in spite of denials by Folke It is now seems like a slam dunk that this research was funded, at least in part by U. S taxpayer dollars. Through a grant processed by the National Institute of Health that Grant by the way was proposed to the agency that is run by wait for it, Doctor. Tony Foti. Folkie gave sworn testimony before a Senate committee. That neither his agency nor the NIH funded gain of function research. This now appears to be an outright lie. Let me quote from an article and then there appeared recently in The New York Post. A report by the intercept, This post article says, is referring to another report. A report by the intercept Setting newly released documents appears to contradict Dr Fauci's claims that the National Institutes of Health did not fund gain of function. Research at the lab, the lab being the Wuhan Institute of Virology Gain of function. Research involved in involves increasing the transmission. Uh, the ability to transmit of a virus to predict what new diseases could emerge and to develop vaccines and therapeutics to treat them. The documents show a grand proposal from, uh, a place called the Eco Health Alliance that was filed with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is the agency that Fauci runs so this actual documents? Sure. It's kind of like laundering the money through a middleman. That's kind of what this process is. The grand proposal, the article says here was very project titled Quote. Understanding The Risk of Bat Coronavirus, Emergency end quote. It involves screening thousands of bad samples and people who worked with animals for novel coronavirus is The Wuhan Wuhan Institute of Virology received 599,000 hours for bat coronavirus research after the grant $13.1 million in funding over a five year period between 2014 and 2019. The Trump Administration ending that ended that funding in 2020. By the way, there's an interesting revelation about ongoing funding of that's it's just research at the Wuhan Institute. The proposal back to the New York Post article proposal pointed out the high risks involved in conducting such research. In the proposal itself quoting for the proposal, quote field work involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other C O. V s while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled. Richard Ebright, molecular biologist at Rutgers University, said the documents show that folks she had been quote, untruthful and quote about gain of function research. According to a bright quote the documents make it clear that exhortations by the NIH director Francis Collins and the N I A I D Director Anthony Fauci that the NIH did not support gain of function, research or potential pandemic passages enhancement at the Wuhan Institute of Virology are untruthful. End quote. So this Eve right guide from Rutgers just lays it right out there know that. What this means is they did fund exactly this type of research in any statements to the contrary, are untruthful. But that's not all. According to Senator Rand, Paul. There is an ongoing grant. It's still in place that funnels us tax towers to the Wuhan lab through get this 2025. I'm going Senator Paul opines that it's likely that Dr Fauci won't pay any legal price for allegedly lying under oath. Here's what Rand, Paul said. It's a felony punishable by five years in jail. We've referred it to the Department of Justice. I don't think Biden's Department of Justice will do anything with it. But yes, it is. It is very dangerous to have Public officials who we need to have trust in coming and lying to us, But he has lied. Dozens of times usually tells us that it's for our own good. But yes, he is dissembled. His obvious skated as other nicer words. But he is definitely lied to the American public, and he should be held responsible. But not just that. The judgment that we should continue to fund this lab and that the virus in all likelihood came to the lab. I think it's such incredibly poor judgment that he should be immediately removed. Let me offer you a couple of thoughts. I agree with Rand Paul, even if it's obvious that Fuji of Dr Fauci rather lied under oath regarding the funding of gain of function research in Wuhan. So she won't be relegated to an orange jumpsuit. He'll skate. He's not going to go to prison or anything. But he has to be fired. And if for no other reason, or perhaps, for this reason, above all others, in my opinion, more than anybody else. Tony Fauci's flip, flopping, fudging and fibbing has destroyed the public's faith in the truthfulness and the veracity of government health agencies. Isn't that right? I mean, is it one of the reasons why there's a significant portion of the American populist that won't take this Covid vaccine is that they don't trust it, and they don't trust it because they think they've been lied to for the last 18 months. And you know what if they think they've been lied to? They're probably right. They probably have. Well, it certainly seems that here's why anytime you think that somebody lied especially light under oath, you have to ask yourself why here would be the reason why. Folks. She did not want a money trail going back to the institution that he runs. That talks about funding gain of function function research at a lab with a security clearance or that research should not have been going on..

Coming up next